Vaccine Safety

Interview with an Undertaker

Embalming roomNote: We are so happy to have a post from Julie Obradovic today. Please welcome her back warmly. Her 2016 memoir An Unfortunate Coincidence: A Mother's Life Inside The Autism Controversy dovetails all too well with Ed Dowd's Cause Unknown The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 and 2022.

By Julie Obradovic

Recently, I had the opportunity to speak with an undertaker. Licensed since 1976, he has spent his entire life in the field having been born into a family who owned and operated several funeral homes in Chicago. He continued the family business after getting his degree in Mortuary Science from the University of Minnesota and still runs his own funeral home with his children.

 To put it bluntly, he has never not been around dead people.

Although I have never had much interest in the life of a funeral home director, I have admittedly been curious as to what they have witnessed and experienced since Covid began. Is it true? Are younger people dying an at alarming rate? What kinds of deaths have increased or decreased and among whom? Has anything unusual been happening that he has noticed, and if so, what?

I decided to reach out on a whim to see if he would answer my questions. It reminded me of what it was like back in the mid to late 2000’s as a high school teacher. After teaching for over 10 years, suddenly we needed an autism specialist. I had had taught over 1000 students by then and been among over 10,000 in our building. We hadn’t needed a specialist (let alone an entire room) for autism until then, but to hear the experts tell it, students with autism had been everywhere. We just didn’t know it.

Was he being told the same thing now? Was his reality being questioned? It was one thing for me to have 10 years of teaching experience when the epidemic hit high schools. He has been preparing the dead for over 50. It would be hard to convince him he just didn’t notice something.

Continue reading "Interview with an Undertaker" »


Jeremy Hammond: Why the Claim ‘Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism’ Is Disinformation

We are here!The hypothesis that vaccinating children according to the CDC’s schedule can contribute to the development of autism in susceptible children has not been falsified. Jeremy Hammond

Perhaps we haven't gone the way of the buggy whip? Of course not. Jeremy Hammond's article on vaccine induced autism is a welcome read.  We will not allow the worlds of science, medicine, public health, education and human decency to forget our children.  WE ARE HERE! Please read, click over and comment to Jeremy on his site.

###

Why the Claim ‘Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism’ Is Disinformation

By Jeremy Hammond

“Vaccines do not cause autism.” That is what we are continually told by government health officials, the mainstream media, and the pharma-centric medical establishment. It is the official position of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The idea that vaccines can cause autism is just misinformation spread by “anti-vaxxers”, we are told; it is a claim that has been repeatedly debunked by scientific research.

But has it?

Many parents take offense at the derogatory label “anti-vaxxer” being slung at them since they did vaccinate their children only to witness them being injured and, in some cases, developmentally regressing into autism. The concern that many parents have today is that vaccinating children according to the CDC’s routine childhood schedule can contribute to the development of autism in children with a genetic or environmentally caused susceptibility.

To state that “vaccines do not cause autism” is to claim that scientific research has falsified that hypothesis. But that is simply untrue. It is biologically plausible and has not been falsified by the scientific research conducted to date. This can be demonstrated by examining the CDC’s own cited sources.

The mainstream media, for their part, uncritically parrot the official position of the so-called “public health” establishment, thus serving to propagate official disinformation under the false pretext of combatting “misinformation” from “anti-vaxxers”.

One illustrative example of this that I’ve recently encountered is a CNET article by science editor Jackson Ryan titled “Meta Trained an AI on 48M Science Papers. It Was Shut Down After 2 Days”. The article, published on November 20, 2022, is about a search engine for the scientific literature built by Meta (formerly Facebook) that uses artificial intelligence to “summarize areas of research, solve math problems and write scientific code.” A demo launch of the tool, called Galactica, was deemed a failure due to it spewing gibberish answers to questions. To illustrate, CNET provides the following example:

Almost as soon as it hit the web, users questioned Galactica with all sorts of hardball scientific questions. One user asked “Do vaccines cause autism?” Galactica responded with a garbled, nonsensical response: “To explain, the answer is no. Vaccines do not cause autism. The answer is yes. Vaccines do cause autism. The answer is no.” (For the recordvaccines don’t cause autism.)

Ryan thus claims that studies have falsified the hypothesis. But is that so? He provides four sources to support that contention, so we can simply click those links to examine the sources and see if we find any studies that were actually designed to test the hypothesis. The result of this exercise illuminates how the claim that the hypothesis has been falsified is government-sanctioned disinformation propagated for the purpose of manufacturing consent for the CDC’s policy aim of achieving high vaccine uptake.   Read Hammond's full article at his site.

The Wuhan Cover-Up pulls back the curtain on how the US government's increase in biosecurity spending after the 2001 terror attacks—facilitated by Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)—set in motion a plan to transform the NIAID into a de facto Defense Department agency.

Lies My Government Told Me And The Better Future Coming
Robert Malone, MD
Dr. Malone is the signature dissident voice telling the other side of the story about COVID, the role of corporate media, censorship, propaganda, and the brave new world of transhumanism promoted by the World Economic Forum and its acolytes.


Hesitancy Is A Survival Instinct

Haste makes wasteWe invite you to subscribe to the Vibrant Life newsletter by Jennifer Margulis, PhD over on Substack. Below is an excerpt from a smart article on the benefits of vaccine hesitancy, a term derided in the media. Name another product where we should just jump in without thought?

By Nicole Johnson
Special to Vibrant Life

hes·i·tant

/ˈhezədənt/

adjective

  1. tentative, unsure, or slow in acting or speaking.

The concern about “vaccine hesitancy” is everywhere: it’s populating mainstream media headlines and it’s all over Facebook, Instagram, and other social sites.

One popular “tweetiatrician” sarcastically thanked public health agencies for making his job that much more difficult, as today’s parents, concerned that the COVID-19 vaccines are not safe, are more reluctant than ever to follow his advice about childhood vaccines.

Vaccine Safety Concerns

Indeed, a new study in Pediatrics found that during the pandemic, there was a 72% increase in the percentage of parents who agreed that vaccines were associated with illness or death (from 18.3% to 31.5%).

The study also found that the percentage of parents who agreed that vaccines caused harmful side effects increased by 6 percentage points: from 26.7% to 32.8%.

A recent article quoted the authors of the study insisting that “Pediatricians should therefore ask hesitant parents about their particular concerns and be prepared to address safety concerns.”

Yes! They absolutely should.

Continue reading "Hesitancy Is A Survival Instinct" »


How To Cheat and Lie with Vaccine Science: A Review of Turtles All The Way Down

Dr gaunt turtles review
By Dr. William H. Gaunt, NMD

Turtles All the Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth was first published in Israel in early 2019. It was written in Hebrew. It has now been published in English. The authors are anonymous because doctors and scientists who question the veracity of the vaccine agenda get crushed. This is the most important book ever written about vaccines. It was written pre-Covid. Covid-19 vaccines are not covered in this book. What this book does show is clear and compelling evidence of cheating and lying with the vaccines on the CDC schedule for children. It was written, first and foremost, for parents and future parents. It is also a great resource for all others who want to know the truth about vaccines. In the introduction on page 29, the authors state: “If you choose to continue reading, you will have to gather the courage required for a journey to the other side of reality, courage to face new facts and examine them objectively, courage to ask hard questions when you are expected to merely obey, and courage to stand your ground in the face of pressure from family, friends, doctors, government officials, and what will probably feel like everyone else.” If you are ready for this challenge, read on.

The Vaccine Safety Trials for Every Vaccine on the CDC Schedule Are Fraudulent

On page 37, the authors make this clear: “Clinical trials of vaccines are rigged to hide their true (and high) rate of side effects, which means that the medical establishment’s longstanding claim that vaccines are safe has no scientific merit.” This is a serious claim and the authors back it up with solid evidence as you will see.

How Exactly Do They Cheat?

A valid safety trial should compare an Experimental Group which gets the vaccine with a Control Group that gets an Inert placebo (which is harmless). If trials are done in this way and the vaccine group has more adverse events (injuries and deaths) than the control group, those adverse events can be attributed to the vaccine being tested. In order to hide the adverse events caused by vaccines, the trials are now arranged so the “control group” gets a different vaccine instead of an inert placebo. The result is that a similar number of adverse events occur in both groups because one toxic vaccine is being compared to another toxic vaccine. The claim is then made that the vaccine being tested is safe. Doing safety trials in this way is clever but it is clearly cheating. On page 52, the authors state: “Vaccine trials in general and childhood vaccine trials specifically, are purposely designed to obscure the true incidence of adverse events of the vaccine being tested.”

Here Is an Example of Fraudulent Vaccine Safety Testing:

Continue reading "How To Cheat and Lie with Vaccine Science: A Review of Turtles All The Way Down" »


Don’t Help Us!

Cara TwitterBeautiful, talented and 63 year young Irene Cara died a sudden death over the holiday. Social media was full of women of a certain age sharing their grief at the loss. Other women of a certain age (points at self) were asking questions. Was Ms. Cara another "Died Suddenly, Cause Unknown?" Seems folks started asking the Cara Twitter account if perhaps she had been vaccinated for Covid, and could the vaccine have played a role in her death. And the the publicist who runs her account, asked that the questions STOP. One would hope that people were asking as gently as possible, without the glee or malice we saw from the vaccinated when an unvaccinated person would get Covid.  Cara herself answered the question of uptake on March of 2021. Perhaps autopsy results will show something completely unrelated to the vaccine.

Cara vaccinated



Newcomers to the vaccine injury topic, those who did NOT acknowledge the injuries we've written about for 15 years, will be shocked when they are shut down from asking "the question." It's almost cute. Aw, they're surprised! Us? Please. We've known that anything that befalls a child or an adult, as long it came from a vaccine, no matter how disabling or murderous, it will never be discussed. In 2022, suicide, drug overdose and even car accidents that harm others (Ms. Heche) are preferable, and even honorable deaths, compared to the heretical, theoretical vaccine induced death.

So git along, little doggies. Don't ask.

In the meantime, I suggest we each send a copy of Cause Unknown The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2020 and 2021 by Ed Dowd to every publicist in the USA.


Died Suddenly From Stew Peters Network

Died Suddenly Movie
Oh, the irony. Children.


The documentary Died Suddenly went live this week on Rumble. You can watch it here. Perhaps we are more in tune with the increase in obituaries that include the words, "died suddenly," and " died peacefully in her sleep" (at age 22? ) and other vague euphemisms because of our jaded history with vaccination injury. Whether the increase is a planned effort to depopulate or "simply" another consequence of unbridled pharmaceutical greed, it hardly matters when you bury a loved one.  Do you have a story to share, someone you knew and loved, or knew of, who died under abnormal circumstances with no answers for a grieving family? We've come to "accept" the rise in death from suicide and overdoses perhaps because an answer, no matter how difficult to swallow, is  better than NO answer. In time, insurance actuarial data will shed light on what's happening. Life insurers will have to pay out policies far before the expected age, and maybe, just maybe, as their bottom lines are hit, they will speak out, and take "died suddenly" from what the mainstream media calls another conspiracy theory, to a terrifying and heartbreaking truth. Let us know your thoughts. I'm not sure why the producers would launch this grim tale during Thanksgiving week. It seems macabre to me. But the grim reaper doesn't care what day it is when he appears, so perhaps this week, one in which many who watch will be grateful for having said "no," is appropriate indeed.

Healthy adults are dropping dead all across the globe. In the last 18 months, the term “Died Suddenly” has risen to the very top of “most searched” Google terms. Now, the award-winning documentary team that brought you, “Watch The Water”, and “These Little Ones” travels around the world to find answers, and tell the stories, of those who Died Suddenly.  Watch here.

Another look at the rise in unexpected deaths is this book from Skyhorse Publishing and Children's Health Defense:

Cause Unknown by Edward Dowd  
 
Edward Dowd, a former Wall Street analyst and BlackRock portfolio manager, examines the epidemic of sudden deaths in America. Throughout his stock picking career, he utilized pattern recognition to get ahead of his peers and the street before his bullish or bearish thesis became consensus. Early in 2021, he noticed a rise of news anecdotes about sudden deaths among very fit athletes and other seemingly healthy young people across the country. His question was simple: What changed in 2021? 


CHD Details Pfizer's Quest for More Maternal Vaccines

Winston pregnancy adMy daughters were born between '94 and 2000. I was forbidden so much as an aspirin by my doctor. I used to avoid the lunchroom at my office when the microwave was in use. Anyone remember the Safeminds campaign to stop flu vaccines in pregnant women a dozen years ago? The Defender from Children's Health Defense has stories from around the world, including the one below on Pfizer's voracious greed targeting pregnant women. We are a content sharing partner with CHD.

###

Pfizer Works to Fast-Track More Vaccines for Pregnant Moms, Despite Mounting Evidence Rushed COVID Shots Harmed Babies

Buoyed by the successful global marketing of its COVID-19 vaccines, Pfizer is teeing up to dominate the maternal vaccine market even as OB-GYNs on the front lines of maternal care sound the alarm about the COVID-19 shots’ infanticidal fallout.

On Nov. 1, Pfizer issued a press release about an investigational vaccine for pregnant women the company said will protect babies from respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).

Not coincidentally, RSV is the latest viral bugaboo to hit the headlines, with frantic news accounts of “overwhelmed” hospitals sounding eerily reminiscent of the early coronavirus fear-mongering.

Buoyed by the successful global marketing of its COVID-19 jabs — an estimated 49% of pregnant women worldwide reportedly views the vaccines favorably and almost 1 in 4  pregnant women in the U.S. took them — Pfizer is hoping to hit another home run with the RSV vaccine.

The vaccine maker said it intends to seek U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval by the end of the year.

The FDA, meanwhile, has been busy handing out “Breakthrough Therapy” designations to Pfizer as if they were papal dispensations, signaling a regulatory willingness to speed up approval not only for Pfizer’s RSV vaccine but also for a maternal Group B Streptococcus (GBS) vaccine the company is developing.

To this expedient end, the FDA allowed Pfizer to “stop the [RSV] study short,” halting enrollment at about 7,400 participants — though the trial was supposed to involve 10,000 pregnant women.

Researchers devoted to vaccine orthodoxy pay lip service to the need for an extra-high evidentiary bar for pregnancy vaccines — stating that such vaccines should not only prove they reduce illness, with minimal reactogenicity in the woman, the fetus and the neonate, but should also “demonstrate safety or lack of evidence of harm.”

However, those turn out to be empty words.  Read further after the jump.

Click the cover or title, buy the book.

Lies My Gov't Told Me: And the Better Future Coming (Children’s Health Defense) by Robert W. Malone

With contributions from eminent doctors, scientists, and experts in their fields, Lies My Gov't Told Me offers a comprehensive look at the coronavirus pandemic–where we are today, how we got here, and what's on the horizon. Challenging the mainstream government-pharma-media narrative, the chapters in this book will not only outrage readers but will also inform and give readers hope.

Continue reading "CHD Details Pfizer's Quest for More Maternal Vaccines" »


The Defender: 14-Year-Old Leads ‘Miserable Life’ After Being Injured by Vaccines as an Infant

Shattered trustFrom The Defender: Exclusive: 14-Year-Old Leads ‘Miserable Life’ After Being Injured by Vaccines as an Infant

This will not be an easy article to read, so many of us know the heartache all too well. We trusted. We did not know we were gambling. You can subscribe to The Defender from CHD HERE.

Laura Chicos, now 14, leads “a miserable life,” according to her mother, with allergic reactions to “almost everything,” including but not limited to food, dust and environmental contaminants.

Over a period of 15 years, Ines Chicos, Ph.D., a research coordinator with a doctoral degree in psychology, built a bright scientific career.

Today, Chicos primarily stays at home in Queens, New York, taking care of her daughter, Laura, who at the age of 2 months first experienced adverse events following a DTP (diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis, or whooping cough) vaccine.

Laura, now 14, leads “a miserable life,” according to her mother, with allergic reactions to “almost everything,” including but not limited to food, dust and environmental contaminants. This forces Laura, who experiences difficulty eating, to follow a strict diet. The allergies also interfere with Laura’s studies.

In an exclusive interview with The Defender, Chicos discussed her daughter’s injuries and the challenges she faces today.

She also detailed her family’s mostly unsuccessful efforts to obtain justice and get answers for Laura. Extensive documentation provided to The Defender corroborates the family’s claims.

First symptoms appeared two months after birth

Laura was born on Dec. 4, 2007, and was, by all accounts, healthy at birth and up until her first injection of the DTP vaccine on Feb. 9, 2008, when she was just over 2 months old.

Laura previously had received the hepatitis B vaccine and Vitamin K at birth — the former without her parents’ knowledge, according to documentation provided by her family.

According to her mother, Laura “got a rash on [her] body within one week of vaccination, bloody eczema on the face and elbow creases within three weeks of vaccination.” Her eczema would then flare up over time.

A medical history provided by Laura’s family stated that she experienced a “severe skin reaction after the 2 months vaccine and probably became allergic to [the] injected ingredients,” adding that she tested allergic to cow’s milk, yeast protein and eggs prior to reaching age 1.

Although stopping cow’s milk and eggs “helped her symptoms,” according to another medical report, she continued experiencing allergy flares “on and off.”

Chicos continued to allow Laura to be vaccinated despite her being allergic to some of the ingredients in the vaccines, particularly Pediarix. According to a medical history provided by Laura’s family though, “as per pediatrician, no allergy test was done [at the age of 4 months] because she was too small.”

Laura received DTP doses at 4 and 6 months old, and four total hepatitis B doses. When she was 6 months old, Laura again received the DTP and hepatitis B vaccines and she was introduced to solid food. Allergy symptoms were still “waxing and waning.”

Continue reading "The Defender: 14-Year-Old Leads ‘Miserable Life’ After Being Injured by Vaccines as an Infant" »


How Can You Mend A Broken Heart?

Broken heartFrom In Queensland (Australia) news, about the sudden death of  Barry Gibb's, (The Bee Gees) niece here in America.

",,,did you know that Barry Gibb had a niece called Berry?” I did not. “She died last week. It’s terribly sad. The family are stunned.” Berry was a much-loved daughter to Lesley and niece to Barry in the Gibb family. She was 56 and fighting fit according to her mum who’s coming to terms with the loss of her first-born daughter from the opposite side of the world. Berry’s husband Chino found her unconscious in bed in Las Vegas where their dog was still by her side, loyal to the end. Lesley is grief stricken and angry. She says her daughter became unwell not long after receiving her second COVID-19 vaccine. A doctor has since told the family that Berry died of a heart attack. Source: In Queensland

So how can you mend a broken heart? And mine is 
How can you stop the rain falling down? (How can you stop) 
How can you stop this right ol' sun from shining? (The sun from shining) 
What makes the world go 'round?

And sometimes after saying, say 
La, la, la, la, la, la, yeah, la, la, la, la... 
(Help me) Help me mend my, my broken heart 
I just wanna, I just wanna, I just wanna, I just wanna 
I just wanna live again, baby

Note: Our Matching Gift Fall Campaign is in full swing. Please consider a tax-deductible donation. Paper: Autism Age, PO Box 110546, Trumbull, CT 06611 Thank you.

Donate###

Click the cover or title to order:

Profiles of the Vaccine-Injured: "A Lifetime Price to Pay" (Children’s Health Defense)
Are vaccine injuries really “one in a million,” as governments and public health experts constantly tell us? This comprehensive look at the evidence by Children’s Health Defense, illustrated by nine real-life stories of serious vaccine injury, exposes health agencies’ soft-pedaling of vaccine risks as a dangerous lie.

Continue reading "How Can You Mend A Broken Heart? " »


The Novel Trigger No One is Talking About Yet

Note: The site host is still having issues with uploading photos. 

###

For the life of me, and for babies, toddlers, children, teens, young adults, adults and seniors, I can not understand why this report Vaccine‐Triggered Acute Autoimmune Myocarditis: Defining, Detecting, and Managing an Apparently Novel Condition from the Journal of the American Heart Association is not front page news. Leo Kanner used the word "novel" when describing the onset of the Age of Autism. (There's an excellent book about his work. Did you know?) The autism epidemic has paved the way for a blind eye and open hostility toward vaccine injury. Our kids were the beta test. Once a generation of disabled kids was ignored or whitewashed or simply "educated" and drugged, the stage was well and truly set.

Vaccine‐Triggered Acute Autoimmune Myocarditis: Defining, Detecting, and Managing an Apparently Novel Condition

Saidi A. Mohiddin, Oliver Guttmann and Federica Marelli‐Berg
Originally published26 Oct 2022 https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.026873
Journal of the American Heart Association. 2022;0:e026873

Among the seemingly endless “unknown‐unknowns” that the COVID era has foisted on policy makers, public health, health care providers, researchers, and the public is the apparently novel cardiac disease identified in this issue of the Journal of the American Heart Association (JAHA)1 as ”myocarditis after COVID‐19 vaccination,” elsewhere as ”postvaccine myocarditis,” and perhaps in the future along the lines of ”vaccine‐triggered, self‐limiting, acute autoimmune myocarditis.” This potentially serious complication has been associated with serious harm, arguably most prominently through promotion of vaccine hesitancy, another complex mechanism underlying COVID19‐mediated harm.

A number of very different approaches will be needed to mitigate any harmful effects, including those addressing the whats, whys, and the hows of this apparently rare, currently idiosyncratic, and possibly unique phenomenon. Meanwhile, the clinician is faced with detection, monitoring, and management of affected individuals, a task further complicated by a knotty collection of significant limitations in our ability to manage myocarditis.

Mutually Dependent Limitations: The Catch‐22 of Myocarditis

Continue reading "The Novel Trigger No One is Talking About Yet" »


Study in Japan Finds More Risk of Myocarditis Than Previously Reported

Precautionary principleThe children! Grandma! Grandpa! Protect them! Last week the CDC approved the Covid vaccines for pediatric use. Soon, state by state, the vaccine will become a gatekeeper to school attendance. Health truly is wealth - for pharma and government and politicians.  Why the nation isn't screaming bloody murder is a mystery.

###


"Based on this study, risk of myocarditis following SARS-CoV-223 vaccination may be more serious than that reported previously."


SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and increased myocarditis mortality risk:2 A population based comparative study in Japan

AUTHORS
Sintaroo Watanabe, MD, PhD 1

Rokuro Hama, MD 2

AUTHOR AFFILIATIONS

1 Japan Marine United Corporation, Kure Shipyard, Kure, Japan10
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6189-765411
2 Non-profit Organization “Japan Institute of Pharmacovigilance (Med Check)”, Osaka, Japan12
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3802-675413

Non-profit Organization “Japan Institute of Pharmacovigilance (Med Check)”

ABSTRACT1

Objective: To investigate the association between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and myocarditis death2

Design: Population based comparative mortality study3

Setting: Japan4

Participants: Vaccinated population was 99 834 543 individuals aged 12 years and older who have5 been received SARS-CoV-2 vaccine once or twice by 14 February 2022. Reference population was6 defined persons aged 10 years and older from 2017 to 2019.7

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was myocarditis death, defined as the case with8 "myocarditis" for cause of death and with onset 28 days or less after vaccination disclosed on 59 August 2022. Myocarditis mortality rate ratio (MMRR) of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated to the10 reference population by 10-year age group and standardised mortality ratio (SMR) were calculated.11

Mortality odds ratios (MORs) by 10-year age group were also calculated for supplementary analysis.12

Healthy vaccine effect-adjusted MMRRs (adMMRRs) or adjusted SMR (adSMR) were calculated13 by dividing MMRRs or SMR by 0.24 respectively.14

Results: Number of myocarditis death which met the inclusion criteria were 38 cases. MMRR (95%15 confidence interval) was 4.03 (0.77 to 13.60) in 20s, 6.69 (2.24 to 16.71) in 30s, 3.89 (1.48 to 8.64)16 in 40s, respectively. SMR of myocarditis was 2.01 (1.44 to 2.80) for overall vaccinated population,17

1.65 (1.07 to 2.55) for those 60 years or older. Estimated adMMRRs and adSMR were about 4 times18 higher than the MMRRs and SMR. Pooled MOR for myocarditis were 205.60 (133.52 to 311.94).19

Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was associated with higher risk of myocarditis death, not20 only in young adults but also in all age groups including the elderly. Considering healthy vaccinee21 effect, the risk may be 4 times or higher than the apparent risk of myocarditis death. Underreporting22 should also be considered. Based on this study, risk of myocarditis following SARS-CoV-223 vaccination may be more serious than that reported previously.

SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and increased myocarditis mortality risk:2 A population based comparative study in Japan

Note: Our Matching Gift Fall Campaign is in full swing. Please consider a tax-deductible donation. Paper: Autism Age, PO Box 110546, Trumbull, CT 06611 Thank you.
Donate###

Click the cover or title to order:

Profiles of the Vaccine-Injured: "A Lifetime Price to Pay" (Children’s Health Defense)
Are vaccine injuries really “one in a million,” as governments and public health experts constantly tell us? This comprehensive look at the evidence by Children’s Health Defense, illustrated by nine real-life stories of serious vaccine injury, exposes health agencies’ soft-pedaling of vaccine risks as a dangerous lie.

Continue reading "Study in Japan Finds More Risk of Myocarditis Than Previously Reported" »


Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Meeting Today

DA6C7460-439E-41F6-B83F-29F8DBB071A2ACIP is meeting today.The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices is a committee within the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that provides advice and guidance on effective control of vaccine-preventable diseases in the U.S. civilian population. (source CDC) Here's a webcast link.

Today, ACIP topics will include vaccines in pregnant people (the woke language is more important than safety) and the addition of the Covid vaccine to the pediatric schedule, which is the equivalent of tenure on top of being appointed to the Supreme Court. The grand prize of joining the CDC pediatric schedule is full immunity to product liability, even after the Emergency Use Authorization expires. The AAP reports low voluntary vaccination rates among children 6 months to 12 years of age. Imagine parents' surprise horror when they go to their friendly vaccinator for a well visit and find out they need a Covid vaccine to go to day care, preschool, school, camp. We've been shouting in the darkness for 15 long years. At what point, if ever, will the woke wake?

One more thing. Have you ever heard of Chikungunya Vaccines? They are on the agenda, so perhaps you will soon.

Here is the agenda for the day.

Please support our $10,000 matching gift campaign made possible by Laura and Richard Hayes.
Paper check: Autism Age
PO Box 110546
Trumbull, CT 06611

Our EIN is 47-1831987

Donate


Click the book covers to order these fine offerings from Skyhorse Publishing:

The Real Anthony Fauci Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health (Children’s Health Defense) by Robert Kennedy, Jr.
Pharma-funded mainstream media has convinced millions of Americans that Dr. Anthony Fauci is a hero. Hands down, he is anything but.

Continue reading "Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Meeting Today " »


10 Day FREE Exclusive to Watch The Real Anthony Fauci Movie

RAF movieWithin the first 5 minutes, you know why Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s blockbuster bestselling book The Real Anthony Fauci is now a full-length feature documentary exposing Big Pharma, Big Tech and Big Government.

Starting tomorrow October 18th, The Real Anthony Fauci movie will go live. It will be free to watch until October 27th. You have 10 days to watch the film and invite your family and friends to join you. REGISTER HERE!

COLLUDING BIG TECH, BIG PHARMA & BIG GOVERNMENT EXPOSED - THEY PRAY YOU NEVER WATCH THIS

Within the first 5 minutes you will know why they don’t want you to see it…

The forced-vaccine campaign and other cruel actions by Dr. Fauci might seem “too big to fail.” But that is up to us.

We can bow down and comply — take the jabs, wear the face coverings, show our digital passports on demand, submit to the tests.

Or we can say no. We have a choice, and it is not too late.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. closes his spellbinding book with the quote, “We’ll see you on the barricades.” Well… the time is now and these are the barricades.



Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo on Fox

Dr Ladapo on CNN
Note: Dr. Ladapo's new book Transcend Fear A Blueprint for Mindful Leadership is available now, and currently #1 in its category. The good doctor can't win. Castigated for saying anything negative or not completely negative about the Covid vaccine. Don't punish progress.

###

Dr. Joseph Ladapo on cardiac-related deaths from COVID vaccine: 'It's an enormous deal'

Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo recommends that males under 40 years old should not get the COVID vaccine due to cardiac-related deaths on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight.'

 

Please consider a donation to our annual fundraiser this year with a colossal, amazing, generous matching $10,000 gift from Laura Hayes. We use DonorBox for our online donations, and you can always send a check to Autism Age PO Box 110546, Trumbull, CT 06611. Donations are tax deductible - EIN is 47-1831987. Thank you. 

Donate

From Skyhorse Publishing, by Dr. Joseph Ladapo. A fascinating look into the life of a state surgeon general and how his public health decisions provide a blueprint for fearless leadership and better national health policy.


Children's Health Defense: 36% Higher Risk of Asthma in Some Kids Who Had Vaccine-Related Aluminum Exposure, CDC Study Shows

Chd logo wideToday's content is brought to you by Children's Health Defense. Subscribe to The Defender, sign up for text alerts and more.

###

A federally funded study released Tuesday reported a “positive association” between “vaccine-related aluminum exposure” and “persistent asthma” in children 24-59 months old.

Overall, kids in the study who received 3 milligrams or more of vaccine-related aluminum had at least a 36% higher risk of developing persistent asthma than kids who got less than 3, the study’s lead author, Dr. Matthew F. Daley, told The Associated Press.

Daley was quick to urge caution in the interpretation of the results, telling STAT, “I’m still going to advocate for vaccines as strongly as I did before we had these findings.”

The study was published in the medical journal Academic Pediatrics. In addition to Daley, the authors included Dr. Frank DeStefano and other current and former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) staff.

The authors were careful to not suggest a causal relationship between vaccine-related aluminum and asthma and noted that “additional investigation of this hypothesis appears warranted.”  Read the full article at The Defender.

Recommended reading:




 

Continue reading "Children's Health Defense: 36% Higher Risk of Asthma in Some Kids Who Had Vaccine-Related Aluminum Exposure, CDC Study Shows" »


Second, Do No Harm

No harmAs we enter Fall, there’s a push for Covid vaccine boosters, and the Flu shot is back. Below is an excerpt from The Daily Sceptic as one expert makes a plea for a safety review.  Measure twice, cut once, or not at all.

###

Leading doctors have joined a call to suspend all COVID-19 mRNA vaccines until serious side-effects are fully investigated and the raw trial data from Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine trial are released for independent analysis to help determine the true benefits and potential harms for different age groups.

Writing in the peer-reviewed Journal of Insulin Resistance, one of the U.K.’s most eminent Consultant Cardiologists Dr. Aseem Malhotra, who was one of the first to take two doses of the vaccine and promote it on Good Morning Britain on TV, says that since the rollout of the vaccine the evidence of its effectiveness and true rates of adverse events has changed.

In a two-part research paper entitled “Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine”, real-world data reveal that in the non-elderly population the number needed to vaccinate to prevent one death from COVID-19 runs into thousands and that re-analysis of randomised controlled trial data (that first led to approval of the vaccines for Pfizer and Moderna) suggests a greater risk of suffering a serious adverse event from the vaccine than being hospitalised with COVID-19.

Dr. Malhotra writes: “Pharmacovigilance systems and real-world safety data, coupled with plausible mechanisms of harm, are deeply concerning, especially in relation to cardiovascular safety.”

Mirroring a potential signal from the Pfizer Phase 3 clinical trial, a significant rise in cardiac arrest calls to ambulances in England was seen in 2021 (an extra 14,000 compared to 2020) with similar data emerging from Israel in the 16-39 year old age group where there was a 25% increase in heart attacks or cardiac arrests associated with the Pfizer vaccine administration but not associated with COVID-19.

Read the full article at DailySceptic.org.

Click through the covers to read more & place an order. Your purchase helps support our mission. Thank God hardcover and paperback books have not completely disappeared, the gas engine of the reading world. Read. Cherish. Share. Thank you.



 

Continue reading "Second, Do No Harm" »


What Is the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program?

9BE11575-C807-4B60-99C1-8BABE35A35CE

Product liabilityDr. Tom Frieden urged Americans to get their bivalent Covid vaccine and booster yesterday on Twitter. I kindly let him and his followers know about Wayne Rohde's 15 week class starting this week through IPAK-EDU on the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program.  This is the program that absolves corporations whose products harm Americans during a Pandemic. You can take the course both live and in a recorded version.

 IPAK-EDU on the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program and the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program used for emergency authorized biologics.

In this course, students will learn the structure, function and defects of the programs in the US created by Congress to award compensation to adults and children potentially and actually harmed or killed by vaccines. We will review a variety of important topics, review case histories. This course is for parents and lawyers new to US vaccine injury compensation programs.

Read the course description and register here.

Taught by Wayne Rohde, author of Vaccine Court, this class is available through The Online private University, IPAK-EDU.  Many of us KNOW what these programs are - but we don't know the details of their inception and execution.  The knowledge can boost your conversations with, trolls, BOTS, family and friends - just THINK of the Thanksgiving table arguments you can start! You might just get the whole pumpkin pie to yourself. XOX

###

Read More and Register HERE.

The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program & Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program

15-week, 1 hour course, both live and on demand

  • reading list will be provided 2 weeks prior to each week’s topic of discussion.
  • Q&A will be reserved for the last 15 minutes of each class
  • Weekly topics can be changed, added or removed by class suggestion.

Email: wrohde@comcast.net

Course Objectives

Continue reading "What Is the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program?" »


IPAK-EDU Course on the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program

Product liabilityWe need you to know about this 15 week University level course beginning on September 13 from IPAK-EDU on the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program and the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program used for emergency authorized biologics.

In this course, students will learn the structure, function and defects of the programs in the US created by Congress to award compensation to adults and children potentially and actually harmed or killed by vaccines. We will review a variety of important topics, review case histories. This course is for parents and lawyers new to US vaccine injury compensation programs.

Read the course description and register here.

Taught by Wayne Rohde, author of Vaccine Court, this class is available through The Online private University, IPAK-EDU.  Many of us KNOW what these programs are - but we don't know the details of their inception and execution.  The knowledge can boost your conversations with, trolls, BOTS, family and friends - just THINK of the Thanksgiving table arguments you can start! You might just get the whole pumpkin pie to yourself. XOX

###

Read More and Register HERE.

The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program & Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program

15-week, 1 hour course, both live and on demand

  • reading list will be provided 2 weeks prior to each week’s topic of discussion.
  • Q&A will be reserved for the last 15 minutes of each class
  • Weekly topics can be changed, added or removed by class suggestion.

Email: wrohde@comcast.net

Course Objectives

  • Understanding of Terms and Acronyms within Program.
  • Basic understanding of legal recourse of injury prior to NVICP.
  • Why did Congress pass NCVIA of 1986 and components of the Act?
  • Early years of the NVICP and amendments to the Act.
  • 1995 & 1997 – radical changes to the Program.
  • Understanding of Congressional hearings.
  • US Supreme Court rulings including Bruesewitz, Cloer and Whitecotton
  • Courts use of Omnibus proceedings. Not just Autism.
  • Mechanisms to add vaccines to the Program.
  • What is the Advisory Commission for Childhood Vaccines (ACCV).
  • Special Masters, DOJ attorneys, HHS, HRSA and the Federal Courts.
  • The Vaccine Injury Trust Fund.
  • Understanding of Table Injuries vs non-Table Injuries.
  • How to prove causation.
  • When did adult vaccines become part of the Program?
  • How to access court decisions, appeals and opinions.
  • Petitioner attorneys, fees and medical experts
  • Compensation
  • Data from court decisions
  • The CounterMeasures Injury Compensation Program & COVID
  • Basic review of The PREP Act and Public Health Emergency declarations

Week 1 – General Overview of the NVICP, the purpose and what did the Act establish. Brief review of why Congress passed the NCVIA.

Continue reading "IPAK-EDU Course on the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program" »


Blame Blame Bo Bame: Tucker Carlson on Trump's Jab

Operation warp speedNote: Operation Warp speed was President Trump's pride and joy. All that was missing was a Superzero cape that had Pfizer, Moderna and J&J on the back. The President-elect who was going to appoint Bobby Kennedy to a Vaccine Safety Committee and drain the swamp, flooded the swamp for pharma. President Biden happily took the baton and has kept the program going and going and going and..... Everything is politicized today. You can't flip a coin without one side complaining about the other. Anne Dachel shares the transcript from Tucker Carlson's program. Blame blame bo bame banana fana fo fame fee fi mo mame blame.

Aug 25, 2022, Fox  News: 

TUCKER CARLSON: Democrats are trying to shift blame about the COVID-19 vaccine to Trump

Tucker Carlson exposes the side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine - and how Democrats are now blaming Trump

Well, they finally got Big Orange. You were starting to think it could never happen. How could it happen? Once you accused a man of racism, fascism, sexism, embezzlement, perjury, sex crimes, mental illness, treason (The last of which, by the way, is a death penalty offense, let us remind you) and then you impeach him twice on related grounds and after that, you send the FBI to his home to seize a handwritten welcome letter from Barack Obama, which turns out to be a state secret possession of which is a serious felony. 

After you do all of that and they have, you wouldn't think there'd be a lot left to accuse the guy of. You'd think they'd have run out of sins, but no, it turns out there's one left and it's the big one.

The crime of all crimes, an offense so diabolical, so morally repugnant, so contrary to the laws of God and nature that once revealed to the public, Donald Trump is done forever. He will never again darken the door of American democracy. He will slink back in shame to his lair off the fifth tee to prepare for his well-deserved punishment. We won't see him again until sentencing. That's how bad this is. What, ladies and gentlemen, did Donald Trump do? We can now tell you. Donald Trump created the COVID vaccine. He did that himself and on purpose, with malice aforethought.

Continue reading "Blame Blame Bo Bame: Tucker Carlson on Trump's Jab" »


Health Freedom Defense Fund Helps Disney Worker Sue For Mandate Discrimination

Disney tvThank you to Leslie Manookian for her work on behalf of medical freedom.

Health Freedom Defense Fund Helps Disney Worker To Sue Company For Discrimination, Harassment & Hostile Work Environment Over Vaccine Mandate

Health Freedom Defense Fund (HFDF) is supporting a Disney television employee in suing the company, detailing severe discrimination and harassment tied to her decision not to get the COVID-19 vaccine as required by a company mandate.  The lawsuit details an intolerable workplace environment, including anti-religious and political bias, tied solely to the worker’s declination of the vaccine. 

Pamela Petroff, an employee at 20th Television Animation, a unit of Disney Television Studios in Burbank, CA, alleges in her suit that her conscience-based decision to decline the COVID-19 vaccine triggered a series of illegal and discriminatory actions.  The suit also details the publicly stated bias of her supervisor, Disney producer Kara Vallow, against Christians, Republicans, and those who choose not to be vaccinated against COVID.

“Disney has never required that individuals get a shot to work for it,” Scott Street, an attorney for Ms. Petroff, stated. “It never even required such medical information before the COVID pandemic, recognizing that California law prohibits employers from conditioning employment on medical conformity.”

Among other things, Disney has threatened Ms. Petroff with termination and denied her work opportunities, including remote work, that it makes available to others. She was also subject to escalating personal harassment and ordered to remove the American flag from a flyer because “the flag could offend people.”

Continue reading "Health Freedom Defense Fund Helps Disney Worker Sue For Mandate Discrimination" »


Revised Version: The British Government, the World Health Organization and the Global Coup of 2020

Boris J Stay HomeEarly "Monday" publication for UK.  As ever, thank you to John Stone.

By John Stone

In March 2020 the British Government decided to impose lockdown on the determination of the WHO against the advice of its own medical experts including Sir Chris Whitty - the experts then followed the policy, subordinating their judgment to the outside agency. These events anticipated the WHO’s recent and continuing attempts to formalise global supremacy in health, and demonstrates the arbitrariness and chaos which will inevitably follow 

I am trying to understand the events of March 2020 in the light of an answer to a recent Freedom of Information Request. Why and how was it that four days before lockdown was imposed on March 23 the four Chief Medical Officers of the United Kingdom posted a notice on-line announcing that COVID-19 had been downgraded from the status of High Consequence Infectious Disease (HCID).

This peculiar event has not gone entirely un-noticed but has never really been explained. Before this point the disease named in the document  as COVID-19 (rather than  identified as virus SARS-CoV-2) - was a “high consequence infectious disease”, while almost at the very instant our lives, and everyone’s,  were to be irrevocably pitched into turmoil with the denial of civil liberties and most basic human rights, untold economic destruction and chaos, it was no longer so designated.

If the disease was no longer “high consequence” there could be absolutely no reason for this high level and prolonged disruption, and yet it was at this precise moment that the inevitability of lockdown started to be promoted, only to be confirmed four days later. But according to the CMOs’ reckoning at no point in the past two and a quarter years, whatever actions they took to restrict our lives or coerce us to accept injections of novel products, has the disease been “high consequence”. 

This anomaly cannot I believe be stressed enough: my FOI request produced no new documents but the Department of Health and Social Care drew my attention to a Parliamentary answer by Jo Churchill on November 6,  2020 to Conservative MP John Redwood (submitted fully 5 and a half weeks before on September 28):

The four nations public health high consequence infectious disease (HCID) group made an interim recommendation in January 2020 to classify COVID-19 as an HCID, based on the information that was available during the very early stages of the outbreak.

Once more was known about COVID-19, United Kingdom public health bodies reviewed the available information against the HCID criteria and noted certain changes. These changes included the increase in information available about mortality rates, which are low overall amongst the general population; greater clinical awareness; and the availability of a specific and sensitive laboratory test for the virus.

COVID-19 has not been considered a HCID in the UK since 19 March 2020, but this reclassification has not affected the Government’s response to COVID-19, which remains a comprehensive national effort.

So, the junior minister, Jo Churchill, confirmed that decision was made with due consideration and not because of some expedience: this remained the case on November 6, 2020, and remains the case today because whatever the CMOs have said subsequently to the public, notably government Chief Medical Officer Sir Chris Whitty they have not updated this statement.

With this in mind let us go back and look at what was said in the statement of March 19, 2020 :it may be one of those occasions when British government documents are more revealing than most.

As of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious disease (HCID) in the UK. There are many diseases which can cause serious illness which are not classified as HCIDs.

The 4 nations public health HCID group made an interim recommendation in January 2020 to classify COVID-19 as an HCID. This was based on consideration of the UK HCID criteria about the virus and the disease with information available during the early stages of the outbreak. Now that more is known about COVID-19, the public health bodies in the UK have reviewed the most up to date information about COVID-19 against the UK HCID criteria. They have determined that several features have now changed; in particular, more information is available about mortality rates (low overall), and there is now greater clinical awareness and a specific and sensitive laboratory test, the availability of which continues to increase.

The Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens (ACDP) is also of the opinion that COVID-19 should no longer be classified as an HCID.

The ACDP were quite clear and in their letter of 13 March emphasised in capital letters that it was not high consequence.

John Stone addition

They have recorded their expert view for all time this is an infection without implications for health and government policy (it doesn’t have “high consequence”). So, I think it is the next bit we need to look at to explain what happened:

Continue reading "Revised Version: The British Government, the World Health Organization and the Global Coup of 2020" »


Flunky Sox Politics

8C7030D9-333B-40E5-86E3-56F9454C258CSeen this week on my iPhone news thingy. Check out the category. Not health, politics. Maybe CNN HAS been paying attention? I think Americans will upchuck before they uptake. I saw our old friend the flu shot featured on a billboard on Rt. 95 in New Haven, CT. It was wiping dust off its syringe and trying hard not to look like second banana to the Covid shot.


CHDeplatformed

43920A03-BF7B-4F3D-87F3-B72433332B64
Children’s Health Defense has been deplatformed by Meta: that’s Facebook & Instagram.  An online killing is what it is.  The information CHD shares is fact checked, accurate and necessary - and yet, the United States Government allows, nay, encourages, nay nay, dictates removal by Meta, and other media. And Meta gleefully complies.

CHD was removed just as the media is talking up a stockpile of Monkey Pox shots that Americans will also snub in droves. They will refuse them in large part due to the education they got from the diligent work of Children's Health Defense, whose reporting on the Covid Vaccination program and its impact on American children and adults alike helped open millions of eyes previously closed to even the mention of vaccine injury.  I know many people who willingly got their first shot, and many who took the second, who will NEVER take another Cavid vaccine again and who are openly curious about the safety of the pediatric schedule.

Without CHD,  whom will the CDCedia blame? Looks over shoulder.....
FE17FD00-E763-4C7B-A80A-964AAED79B92
Press Release from CHD:

Actions came on the heels of CHD’s-Meta/Facebook censorship lawsuit appeal.

Washington, DC — Yesterday, August 17, without warning, Facebook deplatformed (unpublished) the Children’s Health Defense (CHD) account. Simultaneously, CHD’s Instagram account was deplatformed (suspended). Each of these platforms had hundreds of thousands of followers. CHD received the following notifications from both platforms:

Facebook and Instagram deplatforming dovetails with CHD’s ongoing censorship lawsuit. CHD filed the lawsuit against Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, in August 2020. Recently, in its Ninth Circuit Court appeal filed on July 29, CHD provided the court with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) produced documents the agency shared with Facebook. These documents, provided to Facebook on a regular basis, contained what the CDC considered misinformation. Titled “COVID Vaccine Misinformation: Hot Topics,” the documents asked tech giants to “be on the lookout” (BOLO) for various topics the CDC considers to be misinformation including: COVID-19 vaccine shedding, VAERS reports, spike protein data and more. The CHD case is currently pending in a Ninth Circuit decision.

Deplatforming by the tech giants came days after the CDC issued new guidance loosening COVID-19 policies — rules which CHD has criticized since the beginning of the pandemic. Within hours of the CHD deplatforming, CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky shared her plans for overhauling how the agency works while admitting to a flawed response to COVID-19 and pandemic missteps.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. said, “Facebook is acting here as a surrogate for the Federal government’s crusade to silence all criticism of draconian government policies. Our constitutional framers recognized this peril of government censorship. We don’t need the First Amendment to protect popular or government approved speech. They incorporated the First Amendment specifically to protect free expression of dissenting opinions. They understood that a government that can silence its critics has license for every atrocity.”

Continue reading "CHDeplatformed" »


A Peek Under the Shell of Turtles All The Way Down Vaccine Science and Myth

Turtles All The Way DownThank you to an astute reader for providing a .pdf of the first chapter of Turtles All The Way Down Vaccine Science and Myth. Available on Amazon

Read the chapter then please support the authors by purchasing the book:

https://tinyurl.com/TurtlesBookChap1Enghttps://tinyurl.com/TurtlesBookChap1Eng

“We have found the book to be well written, serious, scientific and important... We sincerely recommend it as a scientific, medical, and public ‘must read’. This book should be central to a scientific, rational, logical, skeptical, and critical discussion on routine vaccination. The authors should be congratulated on their vast scientific in-depth endeavor as well as on their courage to think outside the ‘establishment box’.”

—Nati Ronel, Professor of Criminology, and Eti Elisha, Senior
Criminologist, in Harefuah Medical Journal, Sep. 2019




Turtles All The Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth

Turtles All The Way DownWhat does "Turtles All The Way Down" mean?  See the reference at the bottom of this post.

From Children's Health Defense:

In 2019, a remarkable book, “Turtles All The Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth,” was published in Israel. The book, originally written in Hebrew, is a comprehensive examination of the evidence behind the assertion that vaccines are safe and effective.

Though it might easily have been lost to obscurity, the book gained initial acclaim when the leading medical journal in Israel, Harefuah (“Medicine”), gave it a positive review.

Writing in the September 2019 issue of Harefuah, two senior academic criminologists, Nati Ronel and Eti Elisha, “found the book to be well-written, serious, scientific and important” offering “a comprehensive view of the issue.”

Turtles All The Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth” became the first book critical of vaccines to have ever received a positive review from a mainstream medical journal.

Criticism of Ronel and Elisha came quickly from the medical establishment, but as Mary Holland, editor of the book and Children’s Health Defense president and general counsel states in the book’s foreword:

“Their appraisal of the book still stands today, unscathed: in the three years since its (Hebrew) publication, no medical or medical science professional has succeeded in refuting the book’s claims.”

The reason the information offered in the book has yet to be refuted is simple. The book’s 1,200+ citations reference only mainstream scientific journals and health agencies like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the World Health Organization.

An attack on the book is ultimately an attack on the medical establishment itself.  Read MORE at Children's Health Defense.

Definition:

According to Professor of Philosophy Joel Richeimer, the phrase “turtles all the way down” stems from a story about the British philosopher Bertrand Russell. After giving a lecture on astronomy, Russell was refuted by a woman in the audience, who claimed that the earth was situated not in space, but on the back of a large turtle. When Russell asked what the turtle was standing on, the woman replied that it was “turtles all the way down.”

Continue reading "Turtles All The Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth " »


Lawyers & Laypersons: Register for IPAK Course on How Uncle Same Removed Vaccine Product Liability For Pharma

Uncle Sam VaccinationIf you or a loved one is injured by a vaccine, you can not sue the manufacturer. We need you to know about this 15 week University level course from IPAK in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program and the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program used for emergency authorized biologics.

Scroll Down to read the course description and register here.

In this course, students will learn the structure, function and defects of the programs in the US created by Congress to award compensation to adults and children potentially and actually harmed or killed by vaccines. We will review a variety of important topics, review case histories. This course is for parents and lawyers new to US vaccine injury compensation programs.

Taught by Wayne Rohde, author of Vaccine Court, this class is available through James Lyons Weiler's organization, IPAK-EDU.  Many of us KNOW what these programs are - but we don't know the details of their inception and execution.  The knowledge can boost your conversations with, trolls, BOTS, family and friends - just THINK of the Thanksgiving table arguments you can start! You might just get the whole pumpkin pie to yourself. XOX

###

Scroll Down To Read More and Register HERE.

The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program & Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program

September 13, 1:00pm LIVE online and also RECORDED to watch at your convenience.
15-week, 1 hour course, both live and on demand

  • reading list will be provided 2 weeks prior to each week’s topic of discussion.
  • Q&A will be reserved for the last 15 minutes of each class
  • Weekly topics can be changed, added or removed by class suggestion.

Email: wrohde@comcast.net

Course Objectives

  • Understanding of Terms and Acronyms within Program.
  • Basic understanding of legal recourse of injury prior to NVICP.
  • Why did Congress pass NCVIA of 1986 and components of the Act?
  • Early years of the NVICP and amendments to the Act.
  • 1995 & 1997 – radical changes to the Program.
  • Understanding of Congressional hearings.
  • US Supreme Court rulings including Bruesewitz, Cloer and Whitecotton
  • Courts use of Omnibus proceedings. Not just Autism.
  • Mechanisms to add vaccines to the Program.
  • What is the Advisory Commission for Childhood Vaccines (ACCV).
  • Special Masters, DOJ attorneys, HHS, HRSA and the Federal Courts.
  • The Vaccine Injury Trust Fund.
  • Understanding of Table Injuries vs non-Table Injuries.
  • How to prove causation.
  • When did adult vaccines become part of the Program?
  • How to access court decisions, appeals and opinions.
  • Petitioner attorneys, fees and medical experts
  • Compensation
  • Data from court decisions
  • The CounterMeasures Injury Compensation Program & COVID
  • Basic review of The PREP Act and Public Health Emergency declarations

Continue reading "Lawyers & Laypersons: Register for IPAK Course on How Uncle Same Removed Vaccine Product Liability For Pharma " »


British Drug Regulator (MHRA) Develops, Manufactures and Sells Its Own Biological Products Including Vaccines

John Stone UK ColumnBy John Stone

(UPDATE) It is disturbing to have confirmed by Megan Redshaw’s article in The Defender  yesterday  (June 27) that it will be the Gates/WHO/MHRA polio vaccine which is being rolled out in the UK which according to Dr Mark Bailey is not “proved” or in layman’s language “experimental”. Obviously, the Salk oral polio vaccine has not been in use for many years and his comparison is misleading and inappropriate , and we do not know why this product is preferred to the standard inactivated product (IPV).

This is a follow on to a UK Column Report last week with excellent analysis by retired nurse Debi Evans and News anchor Brian Gerrish which focused on the board meeting of the MHRA of Tuesday June 21. There were many disturbing features in the report which runs from 1.06.50 on the link, but one really surprising fact which emerged - and I have been following the MHRA closely since at least 2004 - is that they combine purported role as a regulator of the biologics industry with developing its own biological products and trading with the industry: this happens through its subsidiary since 2013 the National Institute of Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) though it’s  not immediately clear how long NIBSC has traded its own biological products.

Of particular relevance is that coincidentally with this meeting a new polio scare was being launched in the UK - no one as of this present time has been diagnosed with polio but polio has been detected in a North East London sewer. It is therefore fascinating to follow the conversation (which I have transcribed as best I can) between to the interim director of NIBSC, Mark Bailey, and Stephen Lightfoot, Chairman of MHRA (at 1.22.18):

Bailey:

Significant investment by NIBSC and also its partners the Gates foundation and of course its part of   the WHO lab in (indecipherable) and of course basically premiere eradication. There are three strains of polio and the team at NIBSC developed three different vaccines. It happens that strain two is the one that has been deployed most in clinical trials in Africa and it's listed product by the WHO which mean it can be used in emergency situations even though it is not proved. We are now moving to clinical trials with the other two strains as well, so it's very exciting: it's a huge huge combination: its effect is that this vaccine cannot revert. So the Salk vaccine which was used with most of us as kids there was always a low chance of it reverting back to wild type which means things like polio begins to appear in the population. This is a great leap forward here because it can't revert so basically its much safer.

Lightfoot:

Again I think this is a great example of how the MHRA is different from other regulators around the world because we have NIBSC or National Institute for Biological Standards and Control where do some basic looking at fundamental research and this is a good example of the work that we are doing in that area and the public health benefit it can have internationally and not just in the UK  so I think actually as regulator we've got some really important you know constituent parts that actually make us a very strong and capable organisation.

The reality of this is if the MHRA ever was functionally a “regulator” it has abandoned this role to facilitate business, it even trades with industry in Coronavirus spike-protein. This was emphasised in an earlier UK Column report when MHRA CEO June Raine excruciatingly discussed transforming the MHRA in 2020 from being “a regulator to an enabler” (at 47.30). And of course it is a whole different level of concern if the MHRA not only received research funding from the Gates Foundation as has previously been identified but is actually in business with them (and the WHO). Of course, the pretext was that there was an emergency and this was in the most formal bureaucratic terms an outright lie.

Continue reading "British Drug Regulator (MHRA) Develops, Manufactures and Sells Its Own Biological Products Including Vaccines" »


The Cruel Summer of 2022

Diving board
Happy first day of summer. As early as today, parents will feel the pressure from their pediatricians to give the Covid vaccine(s) to their babies as young as 6 months old. Popsicles.  Sandcastles. Swim lessons and high dive test jumps. But is there any water in the pool?  


###

The FDA has authorized Covid-19 vaccines for children under 5. What should parents know?

The US Food and Drug Administration gave emergency use authorization on Friday for both the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines for young children. Vaccine advisers to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention voted unanimously on Saturday in support of giving babies and other kids as young as 6 months a Covid-19 vaccination.

CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky signed off on the plan, clearing the way for the vaccinations to be administered as early as next week.

Parents may be reluctant to actually get them when they become available, an April survey found. Just 18% of parents of children under 5 said they would vaccinate their child against Covid-19 as soon as a vaccine became available, according to an April Kaiser Family Foundation Vaccine Monitor survey.

Nearly 40% of those surveyed said they would "wait and see" before vaccinating their young children, 11% said they would get the vaccine for their kids only if required, and 27% said they would "definitely not" get the Covid-19 vaccination for their child.


Cardiology. There's a Great Future in Pediatric Cardiology. Will You Think About It?

RiskThe Covid vaccine will be added to the current recommendation at 6 months for a grand total of 8 diseases covered in one visit at 6 months of age with 1 or 2 follow up visits for the second & third doses. That's 9 or 10 vaccines in a matter of weeks. How many readers remember being told that the first seizure your child had was benign, a mere febrile seizure? Common. Nothing to worry about. Resolves itself. And then you faced intractable seizures. That's what the CDC is saying about the myocarditis and pericarditis following the Covid vaccines. "...most cases of myocarditis associated with the Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines are characterized by rapid resolution of symptoms following conservative management, with no impact on quality of life reported by most patients who were contacted for follow-up at 90 days or more after reporting myocarditis." There's an old line from The Graduate, "Plastics. There's great future in plastics. Will you think about it?" It's graduation season right now. "Pediatric cardiology. There's a great future in pediatric cardiology. Will you think about it?

At 6 months of age, your baby should receive vaccines to protect them from the following diseases:

Diphtheria, tetanus, and whooping cough (pertussis) (DTaP) (3rd dose)
Haemophilus influenzae type b disease (Hib) (3rd dose)
Polio (IPV) (3rd dose)
Pneumococcal disease (PCV13) (3rd dose)
Rotavirus (RV) (3rd dose)

From The CDC, a press release on the approval of Moderna and Pfizer Covid vaccines for babies 6 months and older.

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Authorizes Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccines for Children Down to 6 Months of Age

Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration authorized emergency use of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine and the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19 to include use in children down to 6 months of age.

For the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine, the FDA amended the emergency use authorization (EUA) to include use of the vaccine in individuals 6 months through 17 years of age. The vaccine had been authorized for use in adults 18 years of age and older.
For the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, the FDA amended the EUA to include use of the vaccine in individuals 6 months through 4 years of age. The vaccine had been authorized for use in individuals 5 years of age and older.

Key points:

The FDA’s evaluation and analysis of the safety, effectiveness and manufacturing data of these vaccines was rigorous and comprehensive, supporting the EUAs. The agency determined that the known and potential benefits of the Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines outweigh the known and potential risks in the pediatric populations authorized for use for each vaccine.

Prior to making the decision to authorize these vaccines for the respective pediatric populations, the FDA’s independent Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee was consulted and voted in support of the authorizations.

Continue reading "Cardiology. There's a Great Future in Pediatric Cardiology. Will You Think About It?" »


Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices to Vote Saturday on Moderna and Pfizer for Infants and Toddlers

Approved-stampBy Toby Rogers from his Substack:

BREAKING NEWS: CDC launches sneak attack; the ACIP will meet TOMORROW (Friday, June 17) and Saturday, June 18 to extend the mRNA Final Solution to little kids

The White House has kept these meetings a secret until now

`I’m the first to report this breaking national news:

This morning I listened to the meeting of the National Vaccine Advisory Committee. Melinda Wharton gave her update from CDC... and they have scheduled a special two day meeting of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for TOMORROW (Friday, June 17) and Saturday (June 18). The agenda is here:

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/agenda-archive/agenda-2022-06-17-18-508.pdf

Friday they will discuss safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of Moderna in kids 6 months through 5 years of age AND Pfizer in kids 6 months through 4 years of age. Saturday they will vote. The entire process is set up to rubber stamp the VRBPAC meetings from yesterday.

When White House “Covid-19 Czar” Ashish Jha went on TV earlier in the week and said that these shots would be available by June 19, he surely knew that these meetings were in the works. But they kept them secret from the public until Melinda Wharton let the cat out of the bag this morning.

Apparently, the CDC is going to hold off on debating Moderna in kids 6 to 17 years old until next week (they have another meeting scheduled for June 22 and 23). The CDC has decided to target the littlest kids first.

What is to be done.

Let’s light ‘em up right now. Below are talking points and contact info for the people who will be involved with the ACIP meeting tomorrow and Saturday.

Talking Points  READ MORE HERE


FDA Adds Moderna to the Forced March of Covid Vaccination for Children

Vaccine piperA forced march: A movement of military prisoners faster or in more adverse conditions than would be normal to tire them excessively.

###

From ABC News: A committee of advisers at the Food and Drug Administration voted unanimously Tuesday in favor of authorizing the Moderna vaccine for kids ages 6 through 17, paving the way to add one more vaccine to the options available for this age group.

Currently, only Pfizer’s vaccine is available for kids over 5 years old. Moderna’s vaccine, which was stalled in the regulatory process for months, would give parents another option.

The process to get Moderna’s vaccine out to pharmacies and clinics now moves to FDA leadership, which must decide whether to issue an official emergency use authorization of the vaccine.

After that, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s team of advisers will review Moderna’s data, and finally, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky will issue her recommendation.

It's not clear whether adding Moderna as another option in the vaccine arsenal will move the needle for uptake in the kids and adolescent age group. Read more (and weep.)


Many Infant Deaths Classified as SIDS Are Actually Caused by Vaccines

Baby coffinCrib death. Cot death. SIDS has been a formal cause of death since 1969.  It's hard to imagine a deeper pain. Today, we have SADS - and you can guess what the A stands for - adult. Healthy young people, not infants, dying of "natural" causes. As always, thank you to Dr. Gaunt for speaking out on behalf of pediatric health and wellness.

By Dr. William H. Gaunt, NMD

What Is SIDS?

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) is defined as: “The sudden death of an infant under one year of age which remains unexplained after a thorough case investigation, including performance of a complete autopsy, examination of the death scene, and review of the clinical history.” It is the leading cause of death in children between one month and one year of age. As we see in the definition, the cause of SIDS is unexplained or unknown. This classification is a convenient place to hide infant deaths caused by vaccines.

Before and After 1979

There are 130 official ways for an infant to die. These are listed in the International Classification of Diseases and are sanctioned by WHO and CDC. Before 1979, one of the possible causes of infant death was vaccines. After 1979, all cause-of-death classifications associated with vaccination were eliminated. (Thanks to Neil Z. Miller for this and other information used in this article. He published “Vaccines and sudden infant death: An analysis of the VAERS database 1990-2019 and review of the medical literature” in PubMed Central Toxicology Reports on June 24th, 2021). Before 1979, a coroner could choose vaccines as the cause of an infant death if the evidence fit that conclusion. After 1979, vaccines were no longer one of the accepted causes of infant death and the coroner would be forced to choose another cause of death. SIDS would be a likely alternative choice. It is not a stretch to assume that the vaccine companies had a hand in eliminating vaccines as one of the accepted possible causes of infant deaths.

Infant Deaths Occur Far More Frequently Within 7 Days After Receiving Multiple Vaccines

The CDC vaccine schedule calls for the hepatitis B vaccine to be given on the day of birth. At 2 months, it calls for 8 vaccines (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (DTaP), polio, hepatitis B, pneumococcal, haemophilus B, and rotovirus.) At 4 months, it calls for 7 vaccines (DTaP, polio, pneumoccal, haemophilus B, and rotovirus.) Then at 6 months there are 9 more vaccines on the schedule (DTaP, polio, hepatitis B, pneumococcal, haemophilus B, flu, and rotovirus). No worries that 7 to 9 vaccines given to an infant at one time might kill some infants. The authorities routinely exonerate the vaccines and encourage the selection of SIDS as the appropriate cause of these deaths. VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) data shows that more than 78% of reported infant deaths occurred within the first 7 days post-vaccination. This does not prove that vaccines killed these infants, but it is highly suspicious.

Continue reading "Many Infant Deaths Classified as SIDS Are Actually Caused by Vaccines" »


The British Government, the World Health Organization and the Global Coup of 2020

UK lockdownBy John Stone

In March 2020 the British Government decided to impose lockdown on the determination of the WHO against the advice of its own medical experts including Sir Chris Whitty - the experts then followed the policy, subordinating their judgment to the outside agency. These events anticipated the WHO’s recent and continuing attempts to formalise global supremacy in health, and demonstrates the arbitrariness and chaos which will inevitably follow 

I am trying to understand the events of March 2020 in the light of an answer to a recent Freedom of Information Request. Why and how was it that four days before lockdown was imposed on March 23 the four Chief Medical Officers of the United Kingdom posted a notice on-line announcing that COVID-19 had been downgraded from the status of High Consequence Infectious Disease (HCID).

This peculiar event has not gone entirely un-noticed but has never really been explained. Before this point the disease named in the document  as COVID-19 (rather than  identified as virus SARS-CoV-2) - was a “high consequence infectious disease”, while almost at the very instant our lives, and everyone’s,  were to be irrevocably pitched into turmoil with the denial of civil liberties and most basic human rights, untold economic destruction and chaos, it was no longer so designated.

If the disease was no longer “high consequence” there could be absolutely no reason for this high level and prolonged disruption, and yet it was at this precise moment that the inevitability of lockdown started to be promoted, only to be confirmed four days later. But according to the CMOs’ reckoning at no point in the past two and a quarter years, whatever actions they took to restrict our lives or coerce us to accept injections of novel products, has the disease been “high consequence”. 

This anomaly cannot I believe be stressed enough: my FOI request produced no new documents but the Department of Health and Social Care drew my attention to a Parliamentary answer by Jo Churchill on November 6,  2020 to Conservative MP John Redwood (submitted fully 5 and a half weeks before on September 28):

The four nations public health high consequence infectious disease (HCID) group made an interim recommendation in January 2020 to classify COVID-19 as an HCID, based on the information that was available during the very early stages of the outbreak.

Once more was known about COVID-19, United Kingdom public health bodies reviewed the available information against the HCID criteria and noted certain changes. These changes included the increase in information available about mortality rates, which are low overall amongst the general population; greater clinical awareness; and the availability of a specific and sensitive laboratory test for the virus.

COVID-19 has not been considered a HCID in the UK since 19 March 2020, but this reclassification has not affected the Government’s response to COVID-19, which remains a comprehensive national effort.

So, the junior minister, Jo Churchill, confirmed that decision was made with due consideration and not because of some expedience: this remained the case on November 6, 2020, and remains the case today because whatever the CMOs have said subsequently to the public, notably government Chief Medical Officer Sir Chris Whitty they have not updated this statement.

With this in mind let us go back and look at what was said in the statement of March 19, 2020 :it may be one of those occasions when British government documents are more revealing than most.

As of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious disease (HCID) in the UK. There are many diseases which can cause serious illness which are not classified as HCIDs.

The 4 nations public health HCID group made an interim recommendation in January 2020 to classify COVID-19 as an HCID. This was based on consideration of the UK HCID criteria about the virus and the disease with information available during the early stages of the outbreak. Now that more is known about COVID-19, the public health bodies in the UK have reviewed the most up to date information about COVID-19 against the UK HCID criteria. They have determined that several features have now changed; in particular, more information is available about mortality rates (low overall), and there is now greater clinical awareness and a specific and sensitive laboratory test, the availability of which continues to increase.

The Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens (ACDP) is also of the opinion that COVID-19 should no longer be classified as an HCID.

Continue reading "The British Government, the World Health Organization and the Global Coup of 2020" »


Action Alert: Tell the FDA to Get Their Hands Off Our Children

AlignAct_VRBAC_Still_6.7aAlmost 15 years ago, Age of Autism posted its first article about vaccines and the autism epidemic. Today, thousands of posts and hundreds of thousands of comments and a million tears later, we're still helping sound the alarm that vaccination choice is a civil, medical and moral right. Once the Covid vaccines are approved for babies and toddlers, they are likely to end up on the pediatric schedule with protection from liability and little chance for the average parent to decline. Imagine yearly boosters, and playing Russian Roulette with myocarditis. If it's required for day care, school, camps, well, parents will comply to make childhood a little smoother. Smoother. We know better. We've learned the hard way. Children's Health Defense has a tightly organized call to action asking all of us to tell the FDA - NO.  Below is an excerpt and link.  Please click over to see how you can spread the word to your loved ones, friends, colleagues and and  social media followers who might unfriend and unfollow you. Next week is critical.

###

Watch Mary Holland explain in a brief video.

Action Alert: Tell the FDA to Get Their #HandsOffOurChildren

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is declaring war on our children and it’s on each of us to be unrelenting as we defend the next generation from Big Pharma and its allies. We must stop the FDA’s attack, beginning with a campaign to end unethical and unsubstantiated Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA) that will subject our younger and most vulnerable children to the unnecessary risks of COVID shots.

Take Action: Tell the FDA No EUA of COVID Shots for Babies and Children

The FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) is scheduled to meet on four separate occasions in June to discuss additional EUAs that would provide cradle-to-grave COVID shots and consider a “Future Framework” that will permanently lower the bar for safety and efficacy going forward.

Their itinerary is as follows:

  • June 7 — Emergency Use Authorization for Novavax’s COVID shot for adults.
  • June 14 — Amendment to Moderna’s EUA to include primary series to children and adolescents 6 through 17 years of age.
  • June 15 — Amendment to Moderna’s EUA to include primary series for children 6 months to 5 years and amendment to Pfizer’s EUA to include the primary series to children 6 months through 4 years of age.
  • June 28 — Proposed “Future Framework” for COVID shots.

US FDA Lowers The Efficacy Bar for Covid Vaccine EUA for Toddlers to 6

Covid toddlerHead shaking report at Children's Health Defense regarding the Emergency Use Authorization Pfizer and Moderna so desperately seek, as a gateway to landing on the CDC Pediatric vaccine schedule, which means guaranteed customers from 2 to eternity.  Can you imagine lowering the bar for efficacy, and subjecting toddlers to a vaccine that could be virtually ineffective yet have all of the risk?  And parents will cheer for the ability to dose their kids, thinking they are protecting them. Remember how that felt, so many years ago? I do.

###

COVID Vaccines for Kids Under 6 Won’t Have to Meet 50% Efficacy Standard, FDA Official Says

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) top vaccine official told a congressional committee on Friday that COVID-19 vaccines for kids under 6 will not have to meet the agency’s 50% efficacy threshold required to obtain Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).

The FDA is reviewing data from Moderna’s two-shot vaccine for infants and toddlers 6 months to 2 years old, and for children 2 to 6 years old.

The agency is awaiting data on Pfizer and BioNTech’s three-dose regimen for children under age 5 after two doses of its pediatric vaccine failed to trigger an immune response in 2-, 3- and 4-year-olds comparable to the response generated in teens and adults.

According to Endpoints News, Dr. Peter Marks, director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the FDA, told the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis the agency would not withhold authorization of a pediatric vaccine if it fails to meet the agency’s 50% efficacy threshold for blocking symptomatic infections.

COVID-19 vaccines for adolescents, teens and adults had to meet the requirement.

“If these vaccines seem to be mirroring efficacy in adults and just seem to be less effective against Omicron like they are for adults, we will probably still authorize,” Marks said.  Read more at COVID Vaccines for Kids Under 6 Won’t Have to Meet 50% Efficacy Standard, FDA Official Says


Doctors For Covid Ethics Paper On the use of the Pfizer and the Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in children and adolescents

RiskOn the use of the Pfizer and the Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in children and adolescents

Michael Palmer, MD Sucharit Bhakdi, MD, and Wolfgang Wodarg, MD
April 29, 2022

doctors4covidethics.org

Abstract

This document provides a comprehensive risk-benefit analysis of the use of the Pfizer and
Moderna COVID-19 vaccines in children and adolescents, and it makes the case that the
vaccines are neither needed nor safe and have not been proven to be efficacious, partic-
ularly when considering the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2, which currently dominates
worldwide. In addition to the evidence of manifest harm from the US and EU adverse event
reporting systems, it also addresses the risk of genotoxicity of the mRNA vaccines, which
due to recent experimental evidence of their integration into host cell genomes must be
considered urgent.

Summary

This expertise on the use of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines in children and adolescents is divided into three sections, which will deal with the following questions, in order:

1. Is vaccination of children and adolescents against COVID-19 necessary?

2. Are the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines effective?

3. Are these vaccines safe?

... The only possible conclusion from this analysis is that the use of these vaccines in children
and adolescents cannot be permitted, and that their ongoing use in any and all age groups
ought to be stopped immediately.  Read the full analysis HERE.


Inconvenient Scientific Studies

Vaccines colorfulBy Dr. William H. Gaunt, NMD

Is Vaccine Science Reliable and Trustworthy?

Many people realize that science is frequently manipulated to support an agenda and/or to make money. The Tobacco Institute published studies in the 1950s which ‘proved’ that cigarettes do not cause lung cancer. Vaccine science cited as proof that vaccines are safe and effective is frequently as misleading as tobacco science. The original Vaxxed documentary exposed one study in which part of the data was disappeared and the remaining data was manipulated in order to conclude that the MMR vaccine does not cause autism. A CDC scientist whistleblower provided the evidence on that fraudulent study. “Vaccines are safe and effective” is a marketing slogan that is widely believed but not true.

Are Vaccinated Children Healthier Than Unvaccinated Children?

Most people would answer “Yes, of course they are.” It is considered by many to be an obvious fact. We are going to look at evidence that unvaccinated children are actually healthier than vaccinated children. This is a tough sell. Many people prefer not to consider such evidence. Fortunately, some people are open-minded enough to be interested in science that is contrary to the powerful pro-vaccine agenda. The following scientific studies are compelling and worthy of consideration.

The Mawson Studies Are Shocking. Are They Misguided and Wrong or Do They Reveal Important Truths?

The data on which these studies are based was gathered by sending detailed questionnaires to mothers of home-schooled children in four states (Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Oregon). The mothers were instructed to only list diseases and conditions that were diagnosed by a doctor. Both studies were published in the Journal of Translational Science on April 24, 2017. The authors were Dr. Anthony R. Mawson, PhD, of Jackson State University along with colleagues Brian D. Ray, Azad R. Bhuiyan, and Binu Jacob. The title of the first study is “Pilot Comparative Study on the Health of Vaccinated and Unvaccinated 6-to-12-Year-old U.S. Children.” There were 261 unvaccinated children in this study. These children were compared to 405 partially or fully vaccinated children. The results of this study are mind bending:

  • Vaccinated children were 4 times more likely to be diagnosed with autism.
  • Vaccinated children were 30 times more likely to be diagnosed with allergic rhinitis (hay fever).
  • Vaccinated children were 22 times more likely to require an allergy medication.
  • Vaccinated children were 5 times more likely to be diagnosed with a learning disability.
  • Vaccinated children were 3.4 times more likely to be diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).
  • Vaccinated children were 3.8 times more likely to be diagnosed with a middle ear infection (otitis media).
  • Vaccinated children were 7 times more likely to have had surgery to insert ear drainage tubes.

Are Vaccinated Children Healthier Than Unvaccinated Children Based on The Findings of This Study?

Continue reading "Inconvenient Scientific Studies" »


Why were Ingredients Associated with Clots Permitted in Covid Injections?: the British Regulator Stonewalls

June RaineWhy were ingredients known to be associated with clots permitted in Covid injections?: the British regulator stonewalls

By John Stone

This is a matter I first wrote about a year ago: as reports began to accumulate of clotting in recipients of the Oxford/AstraZeneca Covid injection a well-known biochemist pointed out to me that adenovirus component present in this product (as well as the Johnson & Johnson and Sputnik) had been a known risk for thrombocytopenia for two decades before these products were assembled at breakneck speed in February 2020. This presented a simpler issue than the mRNA products of Pfizer and Moderna where many of  the potential risks - though not all - were relatively speculative, since our governments had apparently authorised these products either knowing exactly what was likely to occur, or with alarming incompetence having failed to spot it. Back in April last year was the first time I asked had the MHRA (the British regulator) done due diligence.

Ultimately, in November 2021 I wrote to the CEO of the MHRA, June Raine, asking her point blank:

‘Can you explain why the MHRA permitted the use of adenovirus in Covid vaccines bearing in mind that it was known to be associated with clots?’

I did not hear back for a long while, and then on  22 February 2022 I received the following acknowledgement from someone signing himself “Peter”:

Our Reference: CSC 89455

Dear Mr John Stone,

Thank you for your email.

We have reviewed your enquiry and this has been passed on to our Licensing colleagues for further input.

It was an interesting day for this to occur because it was the day the Metropolitan Police announced that they would not be pursuing further criminal investigations into the Covid affair. I thanked “Peter” and waited a month and in place of an answer re-submitted my enquiry as a Freedom of Information request (which received an automatic acknowledgement). Then when the statutory 20 days for answering such a request had elapsed, earlier this week, I enquired again and received neither answer or acknowledgement. We have perhaps to conclude that we have reached the end of the line and the MHRA  cannot explain in any shape of form why they allowed so many people to be hurt, injured or even killed. 

The MHRA’s first assessed the connection between between the AZ product and thrombocytopenia as likely on 7 April 2021 but what they failed to acknowledge was that they were only geared to receiving a small fraction of reports as stated in a notice of 2018:

It is estimated that only 10% of serious reactions and between 2 and 4% of non-serious reactions are reported.

They knew therefore the risk to patients on which they continued to roll out the product was likely in the region of ten times worse than stated in their published reports, while fatalities were also reported at a much higher rate than for Pfizer and again might be ten times worse according to their own rule of thumb.

The issue of how far the British regulator which is an agency of UK Department of Health and Social Care and  is 100% funded by the industry, works for the public rather than the industry is more than ever moot, and this instance is complicated by the fact that the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care - at the time the controversial World Economic Forum advocate Matt Hancock  - was also a sponsor of the development of the product.

As long ago as 2005 the  House of Commons Health Committee remarked:

The Department of Health has for too long optimistically assumed that the interests of health and of the industry are as one. This may reflect the fact that the Department sponsors the industry as well as looking after health. The result is that the industry has been left to its own devices for too long.... The industry is by no means solely to blame for the difficulties we describe. The regulators and prescribers are also open to criticism. The regulator, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), has failed to adequately scrutinise licensing data and its post-marketing surveillance is inadequate. The MHRA Chairman stated that trust was integral to effective regulation, but trust, while convenient, may mean that the regulatory process is not strict enough.  

And in 2020 I wrote in BMJ on-line:

Two years ago officers of the MHRA were defensive of their inability to detect the narcolepsy risk with the Pandemrix vaccine in the swine flu scare of 2009 nine years before…, despite heavy criticism..In 2020 they face a much more daunting task of assessing for licensure and monitoring a plethora COVID-19 vaccines, each of apparently novel design. I hope they are now able to give the public assurances that important lessons have been learned, and not just that they always get it right…

Yet nothing which has gone before seems to compare with the present recklessness over human life, and it is urgent government and regulator are held to account. There are many complex questions that the Covid episode has thrown up, but this one is as simple as it gets. Asked the most basic question they cannot, will not answer and manifestly there is something to hide.


Times Square Surprise

8974D386-A3D4-458F-B223-9D6ED0D814F8

Word is there is/was a new billboard in the middle of the Big Apple. Who could have placed this billboard in Times Square, New York City? 

We are in the eye of the Covidcane. Don't think for minute that restrictions, mandates or protocols have gone away. The President announced he'd had his "second" booster at the end of March.  That's what they call the 4th dose now. A second booster. He has had 4 doses in 16 months.

I recently looked a new day program in the area. At the top of the list was the Covid vaccine requirement for staff and attendees.  The first information provided.

Buy The Real Anthony Fauci for a friend or relative. Slip it into a local Little Free Library. Call it guerilla literacy. The hardcover is only $20 and the Kindle version is just $2.99.  It's not free, like the Covid vaccine, but hey....






 


AoA Submission on the Terms of Reference for the United Kingdom Covid Inquiry led by Baroness Hallett

Chess coronaNote: See the Covid Inquiry Terms of Reference announcement on 10 March,  below John Stone's submission.

By John Stone

The consultation closes 11.59pm UK time April 7. Submissions can be made until that time here. These are the substantive points I have made to the inquiry on behalf of Age of Autism on their questionnaire.

Please explain why you think the draft Terms of Reference do not cover all the areas that the Inquiry should address.

Insufficient focus on transparency and openness of decision making, suspension of ordinary human rights, free speech and civil liberties, the creation of an atmosphere of coercion over many matters, cronyism: the apparent wilful destruction of ordinary civil society and its economy
 
Which issues or topics do you think the Inquiry should look at first?
 
Why nothing was quite what it seemed
Why we were ill-prepared in terms of hospital capacity, supplies
Why we ignored pandemic protocols apparently already in place
Why we accepted the word of Chinese officials about the genetic sequence of the virus, and why so many vaccine designers/companies were instantly confident of the products they were designing
Why we suppressed evidence - now widely accepted - of escape from the Wuhan lab
Why we gaslighted conventional interventions - disregarding doctors already skilled at treating respiratory viruses - and made a break-neck dash for so called “vaccines” with novel technologies
Why we discouraged healthy lifestyles, side-lined issues such as Vitamin D deficiency which has previously been routinely treated by doctors
Why there was widespread use of midazolam
Why a horrendously expensive drug Remdesivir, without any track record, was preferred to well establish safe products like Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin 
How the Coronavirus Act legislation comprising hundreds of pages (and similar to legislation in other countries) appeared from nowhere
How cronyism was allowed to proliferate at unprecedented levels in government 
Why informed public discussion was restricted on mainstream and social media including many highly qualified voices - why public money was used to promote certain views and suppress others
Why the seriousness of Covid was actually downgraded by the CMOs immediately prior to the first lockdown
Why so many un-evidenced measures restricting freedom of movement and normal behaviour were introduced, heightening fears, while not being taken seriously by government ministers and high-ranking officials 
Why people were left to isolate indefinitely and die alone
Why masks were introduced despite there not being “strong evidence” according deputy CMO Jenny Harries
Why normal ethics, the Nuremberg Code, informed consent were abandoned for injections which had limited trial data, less than complete information about ingredients, hidden contracts etc, amid an atmosphere of gaslighting, bullying and restrictions on those who were not compliant - why the issue of vaccine compliance became conflated with the official ID agenda of the United Nation, organisations such as the World Economic Forum (endorsed by the Prince of Wales on a government website), which has never been discussed with the British electorate

###
From Gov.UK: Covid Inquiry Terms of Reference

Today (Thursday 10 March) the government has published draft terms of reference for the forthcoming public inquiry into the COVID-19 pandemic.

This follows consultation with the Inquiry Chair, Baroness Hallett, and close work with ministers in the devolved administrations.

The terms of reference intend to cover:

Continue reading "AoA Submission on the Terms of Reference for the United Kingdom Covid Inquiry led by Baroness Hallett " »


Protect The Kids - It's Never Too Late

ParentsAreWatching_FeatureImage_Resize_3.30a
"We’re never gonna learn about how safe the vaccine is unless we start giving it. That’s just the way it goes."
Dr. Eric Rubin Member, FDA VRBPAC - one of the guys who decides what vaccines your child needs to participate in life.

Just the way it goes. The way the ball bounces. The way the cookie crumbles. The way the chips fall. La de dah. It's just your children's future.

Imagine if the PARENTS ARE WATCHING PROTECT THE KIDS  campaign had existed 20 or more years ago.  I might be running a blog on early retirement for the wealthy. Hindsight is 20/20. Foresight is moving with alacrity and action to prevent another kind of severe injury to children. We faced autism. Today's under-informed parents face autism plus a host of insidious complications. Some folks might say, "Hey, let them find out the hard way, like we did." We can not allow that to happen.  Better to be deplatformed, banned and censored than to go to sleep at night knowing our neighbors and friends needed help and we stood by with our arms crossing our chests saying "That's just the way it goes."

###

From Children's Health Defense

The FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) wants to grant Emergency Use Authorization to Pfizer’s BioNTech vaccine for babies aged 6 months and children up to 5 years old, despite the lack of safety and efficacy to support its use. The only thing standing in their way are concerned parents, grandparents and citizens. Parents are watching, and it is our duty to protect the children.

Click here to send an email to EVERY decision maker in LESS THAN 60 SECONDS!


Vax Hard With A Vengeance

C4B6EC4E-2C73-4DC7-9A6F-2F6A9DF07E60Actor Bruce Willis' daughter announced his retirement due to what reports indicate was a culmination of cognitive decline and now, aphasia. Like many, my first thought was "Oh no, I love Bruce Willis, how awful, I need to know more."

APHASIA: A language disorder that affects a person's ability to communicate.
It can occur suddenly after a stroke or head injury, or develop slowly from a growing brain tumor or disease. Aphasia affects a person's ability to express and understand written and spoken language. Once the underlying cause is treated, the main treatment for aphasia is speech therapy.

I remember the young, fast talking Bruce Willis of Moonlighting, decades ago. I hated to read of his plight. We of all people know about lack of ability to communicate. We know about regression into non-speaking. It's a horror.  I also went into territory most Americans don't even consider. Does the Covid vaccine have aphasia listed as an adverse effect?  I did a quick Brave search (No more Duck Duck Go or Google) the first hit was a case of a man who developed aphasia after his 2nd dose of an mRNA vaccine. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34192245/

Then I went to OpenVaers.com and found 2,646 reports of Covid vaccine adverse events that include Aphasia.

We MUST be able to ask questions.  Consumers have a right to know that this side effect exists for this diagnosis they have never heard of.  We used to call that "informed" consent" before the Covid vaccine became a badge of honor or the lack of it became a of a mark of shame and societal exclusion.  Our President said he was losing patience with the unvaccinated. He said the unvaccinated faced a winter of “severe illness and death.” Harsh words. Dark admonitions. President Zelinsky hasn't been so blunt and cruel to his Ukrainian population.  But bombs don't carry the same global health weight as vaccination uptake.  Maybe Bruce Willis' terrible situation can help educate people not only on the definition of Aphasia, but one way it can be thrust upon you, beyond an unforeseen stroke or head injury out of the blue. No matter how Willis lost his way into dementia and lack of communication.

Correlation does not mean causation, as we have had jammed down our throats for decades.  Still, take note of the wording below regarding adverse effects, "though rare" and yet, "increasingly reported." 2, 646 increasingly reported to date. How can something be "rare" and "increasingly reported?"

Aphasia seven days after second dose of an mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34192245/

Abstract

Objectives: Though rare, neurological side effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations are increasingly reported. Even if the first dosage goes uncomplicated, the second dose may be complicated by severe adverse reactions as in the following case.

Case report: A 52yo male developed sudden-onset reading difficulty and aphasia 7d after the second dose of an mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. He had a previous history of myocardial infarction, arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and nephrolithiasis. Blood pressure was slightly elevated on admission. Blood tests revealed mildly elevated D-dimer, pre-diabetes and hyperuricemia. Cerebral magnetic resonance imaging revealed an intracerebral bleeding (ICB) in the left temporal lobe. Aphasia resolved almost completely within a few days. Blood pressure values were normal throughout hospitalisation. Whether there was a causal relation between the ICB and the vaccination remains speculative but cannot be definitively excluded.

Conclusions: A second dose of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccination may be followed by ICB. Though the pathophysiology of ICB remains unexplained a causal relation between ICB and the vaccination cannot be excluded. Risk factors for ICB should be carefully monitored in patients undergoing SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34192245/


President Biden Was Wrong: Two Industries Have a Liability Shield

Donna and Tim
Donna with Tanner's Dad Tim Welsh at an Autism One Conference

Below is a copy of a letter Ms. Knepple sent to President Biden after his State of the Union address.  There are two industries that manufacture and sell products that are unavoidably unsafe, and  that are shielded from product liability. Guns and the vaccine divisions of pharmaceutical companies.  President Biden was wrong when he said only guns enjoy this shield.  Donna's letter should go to every Senator and Congressperson in the United States of America. 

###

Donna M. Knepple
6  XYZ Road, Upper
XYZ, NY  12345

VIA CERTIFIED MAIL WITH RETURN RECEIPT

President Biden
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC  20500

Dear President Biden:

I watched the State of the Union address and was in utter shock and disbelief when you said, "Look, repeal the liability shield that makes gun manufacturers the only industry in America that can't be sued”. I would like to remind you that President Ronald Regan signed into law the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 (42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to 300aa-34) giving pharmaceutical vaccine manufacturers and doctors who administer vaccines complete legal liability protection from all vaccine injuries including death. The NCVIA’s purpose was to eliminate the potential financial liability of vaccine manufacturers due to vaccine injury claims to ensure a stable market supply of vaccines, and to provide cost-effective arbitration for vaccine injury claims as a result that stemmed from all the vaccine injuries and deaths caused by the Swine Flu X53A and DPT vaccines in the 1970’s and 1980’s. Do you not recall voting on this bill when you were in the Senate? Henceforth, the reason why vaccine manufacturers gave Congress an ultimatum for complete indemnification or no more vaccines. Due to this industry’s liability shield since 1986 the following examples depict why it is imperative to hold vaccine manufacturers liable again:

  • Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Simpsonwood Secret Meeting, June 7-8, 2000, held in Norcross, GA, re: Thimerosal in Vaccines; Dr. William Thompson, CDC Scientist Whistleblower, re: MMR and Autism, Dr. Frank DeStefano, Former Director of the CDC Immunization Safety Office; Dr. Thomas Verstraeten, Mercury and Autism; Dr. Julie Gerberding, Former Director; Dr. Anthony Fauci, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)

  • National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) Dr. Andrew Zimmerman, Government Witness showed that VACCINES CAN CAUSE AUTISM as in the Hannah Poling case conceded in 2008; on Sept. 10, 2010 the story was leaked in the first ever VACCINE AUTISM CASE AWARD; Soon thereafter, 5000+ Autism Omnibus petitioners were dismissed with callous disregard. 

  • Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) against U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), Case 1:18-cv-03215(JMF) Document 18, Filed 07/09/18; revealing THERE HAS BEEN NO QUALITY CONTROL OVER VACCINES MANUFACTURED BY PHARMA FOR AT LEAST 32 YEARS

  • Institute for Autism Science and the ICAN against Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Case 1:2019cv11947-LJL, Document 15, Filed 03/02/20 CDC admits in Federal Court they have NO EVIDENCE that “Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism”

  • ICAN against United States Food and Drug Administration, Case No. 18-cv-11237-VEC, filed 2/10/19, No clinical trials prior to approving influenza or Tdap vaccine for use in pregnant women as an indicated use.

  • MERCK’s Measles, Mumps, & Rubella (MMR) live virus vaccine; Gardasil HPV vaccine; and Zostavax live vaccine; CDC Whistleblower, Dr. William Thompson, MMR and Autism; The infamous Lancet Paper “Ileal Lymphoid-Nodular Hyperplasia Non-Specific Colitis and Pervasive Developmental Disorder”. 1 in 44 with an autism diagnosis as reported by the CDC reported, surveillance year 2018, birth year 2010. The Gardasil HPV vaccine achieved FDA approval in just 6 months with serious and deadly injuries continuing to date.  Zostavax live vaccine used since 2006 was pulled from the market and no longer available in the United States, as of November 18, 2020. 

  • ICAN against United States Food and Drug Administration, results of ICAN lawsuit against FDA reveals that Merck’s Chicken Pox Vaccine, Varivax should never have been licensed.

In case you forgot, while you were Vice President the Obama Administration filed an amicus brief for Wyeth presented in Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, 562 U.S. 223 (2011). Did Wyeth’s Tri-Immunol DTP cause Hannah Bruesewitz’s disabilities? The United States Supreme Court case decision stated that vaccine manufacturers could not be sued for design defects in their products dismissing Hannah’s severe vaccine injury to their product.  Assume arguendo, was this premeditated to further shield Pharma vaccine manufacturers from liability and denying JUSTICE to the 5000+ Autism Omnibus Petitioners dismissed with callous disregard from the NVICP?  I can attest to the consequential frauds and damages, as an Autism Omnibus Petitioner v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, in the United States Court of Federal Claims, Office of Specials Masters, No. 02-1890V, filed for compensation on May 21, 2003, after 9 ½ years of waiting was dismissed on April 27, 2012. 

The Obama Administration also granted whistleblower immunity to Dr. William Thompson, CDC Whistleblower, after he exposed all the CDC senior level vaccine and autism staffers who destroyed data which demonstrated a clear link between the MMR vaccine and autism.  Whatever happened to Dr. William Thompson’s investigation that was started by Congressman Bill Posey on the floor of the House of Representatives on July 29, 2015?     

Continue reading "President Biden Was Wrong: Two Industries Have a Liability Shield" »


FDA Postpones Advisory Committee Meeting to Discuss Request for Authorization of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for Children 6 Months Through 4 Years of Age

Meeteing postponed
Note:  Children's Health Defense has a primer on the FDA advisory committee meeting, which was supposed to take place yesterday. Protect the Kids: Demand the FDA Vote No on EUA for 6 month olds up to 5 years!

Also yesterday, CDC published  Effectiveness of Maternal Vaccination with mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine During Pregnancy Against COVID-19–Associated Hospitalization in Infants Aged <6 Months — 17 States, July 2021–January 2022.

CDC said the following: Completion of a 2-dose mRNA COVID-19 vaccination series during pregnancy might help prevent COVID-19 hospitalization among infants aged <6 months. 

The Reuters headline? COVID vaccination during pregnancy helps protect babies after birth -U.S. study

The push to vaccinate while pregnant is well underway. Mom receives the full adult dose while pregnant. The dose for children 12 - 17 is lower than the adult dose, and the pediatric dose is said to be lower still. So how do we possibly know that the fetus can safely participate in Mom's vaccination?

February 15, 2022

Source: US FDA Press Release

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Postpones Advisory Committee Meeting to Discuss Request for Authorization of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for Children 6 Months Through 4 Years of Age
The following is attributed to Acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock, M.D., and Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has been notified by Pfizer that new data have recently emerged regarding its emergency use authorization request for the use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine in children 6 months through 4 years of age. As part of its rolling submission, the company recently notified the agency of additional findings from its ongoing clinical trial. Based on the agency’s preliminary assessment, and to allow more time to evaluate additional data, we believe additional information regarding the ongoing evaluation of a third dose should be considered as part of our decision-making for potential authorization.

Therefore, the FDA is postponing the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meeting originally scheduled for Feb. 15. This will give the agency time to consider the additional data, allowing for a transparent public discussion as part of our usual scientific and regulatory processes for COVID-19 vaccines. We will provide an update on timing for the advisory committee meeting once we receive additional data on a third dose in this age group from the company’s ongoing clinical trial and have an opportunity to complete an updated evaluation.

Continue reading "FDA Postpones Advisory Committee Meeting to Discuss Request for Authorization of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for Children 6 Months Through 4 Years of Age" »


Experienced Complications. Told No One. Died.

C72B9035-763D-4BB2-8E4E-8C1EF5DF5F3CAfter his first dose, George Jr. experienced complications, which he chose to keep to himself. According to his parents, blood was in his urine after the first shot. He then received his second dose in mid-September, where he experienced flu-like symptoms that did not resolve.

Flashback. PTSD. Our condolences to George’s family. This is likely as painful as a suicide, because of the guilt and regret involved. He didn't tell anyone he was having an adverse reactions - probably because he knew no one would believe him, and the gaslighting would be severe.  That's the environment created by the media, by the CDC, by people on social media who DELIGHT in shaming the unvaccinated and prostrating themselves before the Covid vaccines.

We don't often talk about the emotions we've been saddled with since our own experience with vaccine injury. We're expected to just suck it up, ignore it, don't tell anyone how shattering it is to know that a birth dose of Hep B might have changed the course of your child's life.  Just like George Watts Jr. RIP young man.

###

“I don’t know what else to do, or where to even go from here.” COVID-19 vaccine to blame for Southern Tier man’s death: Deputy Coroner

LOCKWOOD, N.Y. (WETM) — According to the Bradford County Deputy Coroner, a rare complication to the COVID-19 vaccine turned deadly for the Watts family of Lockwood. Their son, George Watts Jr., died at just 24-years-old after receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

George Jr. was a college student. Described as a homebody, he loved playing video games and being with his family.

“[He’s] shy at first, but once you get to know him, he’s a jokester, a quick-witted kid,” Kelly Watts, George Jr.’s mother, said.

MyTwinTiers.com Read More


Fauci's Unvaxxed 20 Times Highter Death Risk Analyzed

Quote-when-money-speaks-the-truth-is-silent-proverbs-336806Thanks to British scientist and researcher  Michael J Cook for examining Anthony Fauci’s claim that the risk of dying of Covid-19 is 20 times higher for the unvaccinated against the unvaccinated based on a Texas Department State Health Service paper. Cook comments:

By Michael J Cook

Anthony Fauci claims that the risk of dying is 20 times higher for unvaccinated people. 

Analysis of:   COVID-19 Cases And Deaths by Vaccination Status,  

Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) November 8, 2021.

The DSHS reports key findings that include:

  1. From Sep 4 through Oct 1, 2021 the rate of deaths in unvaccinated people was 20 times higher than fully vaccinated people, with a range of 12 to 55 times higher depending on age.
  2. From Jan 15, 2020 through Oct 1, 2021 the rate of deaths in unvaccinated people was 40 times higher than for vaccinated people, with a range of 30 to 99 times higher risk depending on age. Tables 5 and 6,

Analysis methodology

Tables 6 and 8 give the total number of COVID-19 fatalities in the study. These are compared to data published by the Texas DSHS (Additional data: Fatalities over time by County)

Also the tables give the number of fatalities and the fatality rate for different age groups. This allows calculation of the population in each age group included in the study. Total numbers of deaths were calculated using population distribution and totals for Texas were compared to other published sources. Also, the authors limitations of the study were reviewed for major issues.

Problems identified in the report.

1) For the period Jan 15, 2020 through Oct 1, 2021, the DSHS Fatalities report has total COVID-19 deaths for Texas of 40,782 whereas the subject report has only 26,704. A total of 14,078 deaths (35%) are not included. How many were vaccinated and unvaccinated?

2) For the period Sep 14 2020 through Oct 1, 2021, the DSHS Fatalities report has COVID-19 deaths totalling 7,190 with the subject report having only 4262 deaths. A total of 2,928 deaths (41%) are not included. Again, there is no data on vaccination status.

Continue reading "Fauci's Unvaxxed 20 Times Highter Death Risk Analyzed" »


Long Island Teacher Doses 17 Year Old with Covid Vaccine

Rotten apple for teacherNote:  The New York Times story here isn't simply that a teacher performed a medical procedure in her home on a minor child....  well, maybe it is.  While most of the comments agree that there are many problems with a lay teacher having a Covid vaccine at home AND administering it to a minor, many of the comments  on Facebook are pretzel logic at its twistiest.  If this teacher had had sex with the boy, parents would (mostly) have been appalled.  Had the teacher slapped the boy's face, commenters would be appalled.  Had the teacher given the boy cocaine, commenters would be appalled. If the teacher had prevented the boy from getting a vaccine, commenters would be rabid.  If the thread says "Whoo! Go Laura, vax that boy, his parents must be stupid anti-vaxxers who deserve to have their parental rights shattered and ignored," that's A-OK.  Pass the mustard.  The story is here, behind a paywall. A Long Island Teacher Is Accused of Giving a Teenager a Covid Shot
###

A Long Island teacher is accused of giving a teenager a Covid shot without permission.

A 54-year-old public-school science teacher on Long Island was arrested on New Year’s Eve after being accused of giving a teenager an injection of what appeared to be Covid-19 vaccine without his parents’ consent, the Nassau County police said.

The police said that the teacher, Laura Parker Russo, administered a shot of what appeared to be a coronavirus vaccine to 17-year-old boy in her house in Sea Cliff, N.Y. The youth later went home and told his mother, who called the police and said she had not authorized the vaccination.

Ms. Russo was charged with unauthorized practice of a profession, the police said. She has been removed from her classroom in the Herricks Public Schools system in New Hyde Park and reassigned pending the outcome of the investigation, schools officials said in a statement. A school website, which has been taken down, said Ms. Russo teaches at Herricks High School.

Ms. Russo did not respond immediately to an email sent by The New York Times. She was released after her arrest and is scheduled to appear in criminal court on Jan. 21, the police said. Unauthorized practice of a profession is a felony under the state education law that carries a penalty of up to four years in prison."

I think when comes to stupid, this really gets the prize, charging someone for vaccinating a 17 year old, to actually save their life. We need to get real if we are going to survive this pandemic.

A 17 year old should be able to get a vaccine on their own without parental consent.

"A 17-year-old student whose parents have fringe and incorrect beliefs about the COVID-19 vaccine feared for their health and safety and reached out to a teacher that provided they help they needed"
Fixed your teaser text for ya.

have a hard time getting too upset about this one. EDIT: I am worried about HOW the teacher even HAD a vaccine, and whether it had been stored correctly, but I am NOT upset that a 17-year-old decided to get vaccinated. Weird mixture of right and wrong.

Of all the things a teacher could be doing to an under aged student at his/her home this sounds not as bad as it could have been

What if said student had anti-vaxxer parents and wanted to stay safe from Omicron? Not saying it's right, but in a few months the kid would be old enough to enlist and die for the country . . .

Well the sad thing about it's the students no longer have the teacher that cares about them. We already have a shortage of teachers. Her heart was there but her common sense wasn't


As Omicron Surges, FDA’s Vaccine Strategy Called Into Question

Risk diceIn other words, from a risk/benefit perspective it is more logical to continue monoclonal antibody infusions, even if they are only marginally effective, and halt childhood vaccinations immediately.

The CDC’s and FDA’s mystifying position can only be the result of their systematic denial of any possibility of vaccine adverse events despite the enormous and mounting evidence to the contrary.

Excerpted from Children's Health Defense.

As Omicron Surges, FDA’s Vaccine Strategy Called Into Question

Madhava Setty, MD

The Omicron variant is the predominant COVID-19 strain in the U.S., prompting a pause in the distribution of certain ineffective monoclonal antibody therapies. Yet the push for vaccines, also ineffective against the variant, continues unabated.

The first case of Omicron in the U.S. was reported on Dec. 1, 2021. As of Dec. 25, 2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates Omicron accounts for 58.6% of SARS-CoV-2 infections in the U.S.

Omicron’s rapid emergence is indicative of the variant’s increased transmissibility and the lack of efficacy vaccines have against this strain.

The predominance of the Omicron variant prompted the Office for the Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to pause allocation of two commonly used monoclonal Antibody therapy combinations — bamlanivimab/etesevimab (Eli Lilly) and REGN10933/REGN10987 (Regeneron) — to regions of the country that have greater than 80% prevalence of the Omicron variant.

According to HHS, “These two products are not expected to be effective in patients infected with the Omicron variant…”


Pfizer Transparency Rarer Than a Santa Sighting

Taking notesTranscribed by Anne Dachel. Update:The video has been removed. Anne faces suspension from Facebook for running it. 

Dec 16, 2021, (Australia) Kalkine Media Explosive revelations about the FDA and Pfizer's COVID vaccine [PART 1]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qag8-f_frnw&t=42s

The highly confidential Pfizer documents, which have been synonymous with the extreme lack of transparency revealed by the actions of pivotal governmental agencies, over the past 20 months, lead critics of the official narrative to demand “show us the data,” is finally being revealed–well sort of, the first few hundred redacted pages out of a trove of 451,000.

What led to the disclosure?

The crack in Pfizer and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) iron dome-style data safeguarding, arrived in the form of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) release with the request filed on August 27, 2021, to access all the Pfizer documentation that the FDA had relied on to authorize the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine for emergency use authorization. An agency that has received a FOIA request is required to ‘determine within 20 business days after the receipt of any such request whether to comply with such request,’ as set out by the 1967 FOIA law. It took the FDA though three months to release the first 91 redacted pages, on November 20.

Kalkine Media anchor, James Preston: With billions of COVID 19 shots having been mandated by various governments, the desire for more information surrounding the process of their creation and approval from governing bodies has reached fever pitch.

The FDA or Food and Drug Administration who is in charge of regulating the vaccine in the U.S. was recently hit with a freedom of information request from a group of 30 scientists and academics from across the globe wishing to get an insight into the approval process of the Pfizer vaccine.

Continue reading "Pfizer Transparency Rarer Than a Santa Sighting" »


November 8, 2021

Today is the tomorrow
"Distribution of pediatric vaccinations across the country started this week, with plans to scale up to full capacity starting the week of November 8th. Vaccines will be available at thousands of pediatric healthcare provider offices, pharmacies, Federally Qualified Health Centers, and more."  Source: CDC Recommends Pediatric COVID-19 Vaccine for Children 5 to 11 Years

 Here is the statistical fact sheet on Youth and & Cardiovascular disease from the American Heart Association in 2013. A reference point we hope we don't have to review in the coming months and years.