"Why the best medical research does not make it into clinical practice"
I am afraid that only a full-on system collapse of our disease care system will allow for a new paradigm to evolve— Dr. Stoller
In an opinion piece on April 29ththe Washington Post announced that Robert Kennedy Jr. is wrong in calling autism, now affecting one in every 31 children, one in every 19 boys, an “epidemic.”
For over two decades the mainstream media and public health officials have done everything in their power to normalize autism. They’ve promoted the ideas of “greater awareness,” “broader definition” and “better diagnosing” to explain away the nonstop increase in the number of affected children.
Having someone like Kennedy in a position of power as head of HHS means their efforts will have to be stepped up, and the WaPo did just that.
WASHINGTON POST
In What Kennedy gets wrong about autism’s causes—We already know a lot about the disorder and why its prevalence has increased by Leana S. Wen, we were told that when Kennedy talks about preventing autism, he’s blaming the parents.
The article included Christopher Banks, president and CEO of the Autism Society, who challenged the whole idea that autism can be prevented.
The WaPo went on to list the possible ways parents’ behavior led to autism in their child
In fact, decades of well-designed, long-term studies have examined the complex interplay between genes and the environment, said David Mandell, director of the Center for Mental Health at the University of Pennsylvania. These studies found a number of factors can increase risk, including low-birth weight among premature babies and older paternal age, though the exact mechanisms for how these cause autism are unclear.
Whatever the “factors,” it happens before birth
What is clear is that “to the extent there is an environmental factor, it is almost certainly in utero,” Mandell said.
Experts deny any increase
The expanded understanding of autism as a spectrum disorder means that many children being diagnosed with ASD today would not have been considered autistic before.
The bandwagon effect is a psychological phenomenon where individuals tend to adopt a belief, behavior, or trend because a large number of other people are also doing so, regardless of their own personal convictions. This can be seen in various areas like social media, marketing, and even political decisions.
Neurodivergent is the new black. Identity neurology is en vogue. What does it mean? Is is an excuse for failures? Shortcomings? A way to shirk the responsibilities of school, social interactions, employment, relationships? Even if all that is true, the insult is that it waters down and removes the urgency for those who have true problems. Yes, I said problems.
By Anne Dachel
Majority of British consider themselves "neurodivergent"
'That is going to change society, but not in a bad way'
Good news for Britain: A majority of the British people now describe themselves as “neurodivergent”!
Just when it seemed that the unrelenting increases in students with autism and ADHD threatening to bankrupt local city and county councils meant something was seriously wrong with young people, we now know it’s all fine. It’s all just part of being neurodivergent.
A majority of Britons may now consider themselvesneurodivergent, meaning they have a condition such as autism, dyslexia or dyspraxia, according to a leading psychologist.
When will we finally figure out what the true autism rate is?
On April 16th Robert Kennedy, Jr made his position on autism clear to the American people. He said the “relentless increases” have made autism an epidemic, and that epidemic is caused by toxins in the environment.
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr is declaring a war on autism — claiming the neurodevelopmental condition is an epidemic that’s far worse than the deadly COVID-19 outbreak.
Bucks County Unit 22. I'll never forget that name. This was the Bucks County, PA Early Intervention unit that first saw my Mia, now 30. I wept with gratitude at our initial IFSP meeting. I'm still sitting in "I" meetings, 28 years later. In 1997, I knew nothing about vaccine safety or side effects. It never crossed my mind. Seems almost a third of Pennsylvanians are well ahead of where I was with my first child, and that's a good thing. Kim
###
By Anne Dachel
More Pennsylvanians believe in link between autism and vaccines: Study
Almost one in three
There was a surprising bit of news out of Pennsylvania this week. It seems that the general population isn’t buying the claim of no link between vaccines and a child developing autism.
About under 1 in 3 agreeing either strongly or partially agreeing that the chances of a child getting autism are increased if they receive the recommended childhood immunizations.
Almost one in three Pennsylvanians believe there is a link between childhood immunizations and autism, according to a new statewide survey.
Respondents may not be overwhelming behind Robert Kennedy, Jr, as the poll indicates, but a large percentage don’t believe the decades of denial from mainstream medicine and federal health officials.
A growing share of Pennsylvanians believe that the recommended childhood immunizations increase a child’s chance of developing autism, Muhlenberg College’s 2025 Pennsylvania Health Poll shows.
Muhlenberg’s recent report shows the results of the college’s recent telephone survey of 521 adult Pennsylvanians. The survey let respondents voice their opinions on issues such as health care quality, belief in the link between childhood immunizations and autism, trust in Robert F. Kennedy Jr., legalization of marijuana, mental health and sources of stress.
The survey results for 2025 showed a notable gain in the percentage of Pennsylvanians who believe there is a link between childhood immunizations and autism, with about under 1 in 3 agreeing either strongly or partially agreeing that the chances of a child getting autism are increased if they receive the recommended childhood immunizations.However, more than half said they disagreed with the statement. The overwhelming body of scientific research shows that there is no causal or correlative link between vaccines and autism. . . .
ALLENTOWN, Pa. —Almost one in three Pennsylvanians believe there is a link between childhood immunizations and autism, according to a new statewide survey.
Thirty-one percent agree “strongly” or “somewhat” in the unproven link that the chances of getting autism are increased if they receive the recommended childhood vaccines — the highest level in the 13 years the survey has been conducted. . . .
The telephone survey of 521 adult Pennsylvanians between March 10 and March 26 has a margin of error of 5.5%. . . .
Fewer than 4 in 10 Pennsylvanians (36%) expressed trust (“a lot” or “some”) in Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to handle health care issues as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Kennedy, a longtime vaccine critic, said earlier this month the department will undertake a “massive testing and research effort” to determine the cause of autism.
Political party plays a role in shaping viewpoints on the relative safety of immunizations, with Republicans nearly twice as likely (41% to 21%) as Democrats to agree “strongly” or “somewhat” that the chances of a child getting autism are increased if they receive the recommended childhood immunizations. . . .
The very fact that they asked the question means that the controversy is alive and well. Maybe it’s the “relentless” increases in the autism rate that never show signs of leveling off; maybe it’s the moronic claim that every single increase is never a real increase. Whatever it is, the public hasn’t been lulled into thinking that autism is something to celebrate as just neurodiversity, despite the pageantry of April, Autism Awareness/Acceptance Month.
Then there’s the future
Three years ago, a pediatrician predicted that there will be a million young adults with autism in the U.S. aging out of school over the next decade.
Over the next decade, an estimated 707,000 to 1,116,000 teens will enter adulthood and age out of school-based autism services. And they will need ongoing medical care and support in their daily lives.
During his press conference on April 16th Robert Kennedytalked about what this population of disabled adults will cost taxpayers.
There’s a recent study by Blaxill et al. and a team of other researchers that said that the cost of treating autism in this country by 2035, so within 10 years, will be a trillion dollars a year. This is added to already astronomical healthcare costs, and then there is an individual injury.
The clock is ticking for all those who are adamant that we’ve always had autism at whatever the current rate is in America.
Note that the autism rate comes from studies of eight year olds, not eighty year olds, and when we’re all paying for the cost of lifetime care and support, we’ll be desperate to stop the epidemic.
More and more autism isn’t something to celebrate as “greater awareness.” It’s an existential threat to our country.
Note: Anne Dachel transcribed Dr. Humphries groundbreaking interview on The Joe Rogan podcast - she reached millions of people. The cat is not going back into the bag.
Mar 28, 2025, Joe Rogan interviews Dr. Suzanne Humphries
Joe Rogan brought up Dr. Humphries’ book Dissolving Illusions, and they began by talking about natural remedies that are often dismissed by mainstream medicine.
Joe asked if giving pharma immunity from lawsuits over vaccine damage had an impact.
Suzanne:Well, we certainly saw an explosion of their creativity since 1986.
You’re referring to the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act that was passed in 1986, but before 1986, we had 1976 which the swine flu vaccine fiasco.
That was a situation where there was so much injury that the vaccine producing c
ompanies were no longer able to get insurance. So they went to the government, and they said, we need you to indemnify us. And they did. So the government absorbed all the lawsuit cases that happened.
So that kind of set a precedent for 1986.
There’s so many lawsuits happening because of the diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus vaccine, that again the vaccine companies couldn’t continue to go on the way they were because they were being sued so much.
So then this horrible act was passed.
We’re going to make you this promise. Yes, yes, yes, we’re going to cover all the lawsuits now out of taxes, but it’s going to be okay because we’re going to pay out these lawsuits, and you’re going to be fine if your kid takes one for the team.
After they get their foot in the door, they narrow down—they basically have a kangaroo court that decides if you’re eligible. The qualification tables got narrowed down because in the beginning they were paying out so much of this.
So not only did it make the vaccine companies very, very wealthy and indemnified, but. . . the creativity of the vaccine companies expanded.
After that they could add different, what we call adjuvants, things that stimulate the immune system so the vaccine works better.
Suzanne went on to explain that IF there wasn’t indemnification, there would never have been the mRNA vaccines.
As far as vaccine trials are concerned, she said,
Vaccine trials have always been a joke, but they’re even more of a joke today than they were in the beginning.
We’ve never seen a vaccinated, unvaccinated study that is accepted by the powers that be as good enough.
Suzanne noted that the vaccinated/unvaccinated studies that they have merely substitute a vaccine for another vaccine, like testing a flu shot against a hepatitis A vaccine.
There’s no saline placebo because the few studies that exist with saline placebos show how bad the vaccine actually is, and how it makes you not only not respond to the disease when it comes around, but more susceptible to it in many cases. . . .
Note: I was on X defending Andy Wakefield for having sacrificed all for sick children when the onslaught of UK haters descended. Keithy Weithy was particularly venomous. I managed to let him down with my sharp, American flair and you can see his ultimate response to me. Charming lad. You can follow the scrum at https://x.com/AgeofAutism This happens almost every Spring. The attacks on Andy Wakefield. We have an entire category devoted to him - https://www.ageofautism.com/dr-andrew-wakefield/.
###
By Anne Dachel
A story on March 19th from Johns Hopkins got my attention.
How a retracted study from the 1990s undermined trust in vaccines and led to a persistent myth.
I immediately knew where this was going even before I looked at the article. It would blame a British gastroenterologist, Dr. Andrew Wakefield, for linking vaccines to autism. We’d be told once again that Wakefield was wrong, and he lost his medical license because of it. There are lots of studies show no link between vaccines and autism.
It’s so predictable.
Actually this article was the text of an interview between two doctors, Daniel Salmon, PhD and Josh Sharfstein, MD. As expected, they began by attacking Dr. Wakefield.
Dr. Salmon runs the Institute for Vaccine Safety at Johns Hopkins, and he has an extensive 30 year background in vaccine science.
Salmon claimed that Wakefield said his study showed a causal link between vaccines and autism.
Salmon:
But once that paper was published, Wakefield got a lot of press and told people that he had shown vaccines had caused autism, which again, that study couldn’t even do.
NOT TRUE
In Wakefield’s own words:
In a six minute interview segment talking with CBS reporter Sharyl Attkisson on Oct 7, 2009, Dr. Wakefield described how he became involved in this controversy.
Note: When Dr. Dave Weldon's CDC appointment was pulled last week, many of us wanted to jump out a basement window. I did too, for a short moment, then I had a Ted Lasso thought. Remember Bobby. When the Democratic Party and media machine stopped Robert Kennedy, Jr.'s Presidential bid, excommunicated him from their not-so-good graces and even his family turned on him, they did us the biggest favor ever. He's the head of HHS! It's almost too sublime to be true. Like finding out the guy who you cut off and flashed the bird at you on your way to work is your 9:00am interviewee. That's 100,000,000,000 times better for us than his being President because he can focus OUR areas of dire need. Dr. Weldon's removal as our next CDC Chief might just lead us to another huge win.
By Anne Dachel
In a surprising move, Dr. Dave Weldon’s nomination to head the Centers for Disease Control was withdrawn.
In a statement obtained by CBS News, Weldon said that Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was "very upset" at his nomination being pulled. Weldon said he had received a call from the White House 12 hours before the scheduled hearing, informing him that the nomination would be withdrawn.
"Bobby Kennedy is a good man who really is passionate about improving the health of the American people," Weldon said. "President Trump did a good thing in making him secretary of HHS. Hopefully they can find someone for CDC who can survive the confirmation process and get past pharma and find some answers."
Weldon said that Maine Sen. Susan Collins had told Kennedy she had reservations about his nomination, and said the Republican senator's staff had been "very hostile" in a meeting with him.
Collins' staff repeatedly accused him of being against vaccines, Weldon said, "even though I reminded them that I actually give hundreds of vaccines every year in my medical practice." . . .
He said that over 20 years ago, while in Congress, he raised concerns about childhood vaccine safety, and "for some reason Collins staff suddenly couldn't get over that."
Weldon also said that another senator, Louisiana Republican Dr. Bill Cassidy, had also said he was anti-vaccine and had once asked for his nomination to be withdrawn. . . .
After a meeting with Sen. Patty Murray last month, the Washington Democrat said she was "deeply disturbed to hear Dr. Weldon repeat debunked claims about vaccines."
What was in Weldon’s past that could make him a threat to the vaccine industry and the claim of no link between vaccines and autism?
Hannah Poling
Seventeen years ago. . .
In 2008, we learned about Hannah Poling, the beautiful red-haired daughter of Jon and Terry Poling. Hannah did something no other child up until that time had been able to do. When her story broke in 2008, she put a face on the autism-vaccine controversy.
Hannah’s history included normal development until an immediate and dramatic regression at 18 months following vaccination. Hannah was typical of so many children in the autism community, but the difference in her case was that the government recognized it, and in March, 2008 her story was in the news.
(It should be noted that the government conceded Hannah’s case in November, 2007, but the public didn’t learn about it until four months later.)
In the introduction ABC said, “In an unprecedented settlement, the government says there may be a possible link” between vaccines and autism—in the case of Hannah Poling.”
The news anchor on GMA, Chris Cuomo, said,
Some doctors say the vaccinations may have aggravated a pre-existing disease in Hannah’s brain called mitochondrial disease. Once that happened, Hannah’s father, a neurologist, believes it triggered her autism.”
Hannah’s the first case of its kind in which the federal government allowed that, in Hannah’s case, because of the pre-existing condition, there’s likely a connection between her vaccinations and her autism symptoms.
Hannah and both of Hannah’s parents, Jon and Terry Poling, along with their attorney were featured in the interview.
The discussion then focused on the question of how many other children have been affected just like Hannah.
Jon Poling said,
As other parents hear her story, I think her case is echoed among thousands of other similar cases.
And I know a lot of other medical experts are going to get out there and say this is a very unusual, odd-ball case, and we don’t really think it is at all.
We just very thoroughly investigated the biomedical issues going on with our daughter. We followed every single medical lead. We didn’t just take autism as a diagnosis and stop there. We did every type of medical testing you can imagine and eventually came up with this mitochondrial issue. How it’s related to her autism is a huge question because mitochondrial disorders are seen in relatively high frequency in children who have autism. I
In fact, one study shows that maybe it’s up to seven percent. In our study with Dr. Zimmerman, we showed 38 percent had certain markers of abnormality which means this really needs a lot of further study and a lot of research dollars poured into it because mitochondrial disease is potentially treatable. There are certain things we can do.
U.S. Rep Dave Weldon on Hannah Poling
Also covering the Hannah Poling storywas CBS reporter Sharyl Attkisson. Attkisson interviewed then Congressman Dave Weldon, MD, about the concession
March 6, 2008, CBS News: CBS Evening News Vaccine Case: An Exception Or A Precedent?
Attkisson:
When you learned about the Poling case, the concession the government made, the government didn’t even have to be ordered to pay. The government conceded that the child’s resulting illnesses were because of vaccines, and part of the resulting illnesses include autism or autistic symptoms.
What goes through your mind when you hear about that case?
Weldon:“
Well, as a physician and a biomedical professional, I looked at the pathophysiology of what this child had.
Is there a vulnerable subset of children?
One of the things I’ve wondered about for years is why do most kids have absolutely no problem with their vaccinations, and why are all these parents of autistic kids saying, my kid got the shot, and then my kid deteriorated.
Is there a correlation there, and specifically, do these children have some sort of underlying problem or feature of their metabolism that causes them to be predisposed to having his kind of bad reaction? And that case really caught my attention because it could be kind of a missing piece of information to explain why at least some of these children who appear to have autism develop after their shots. Why it may be happening.
Attkisson:
What does it say to you that the government has now affirmatively conceded a case in which autism was the result—even though they’re not saying vaccines caused autism, they’re saying vaccines caused an illness in which one result was autism.
The government has been telling the public for over a decade that there’s absolutely no reason to be concerned about any link.
Weldon:
Well, I have a lot of concerns about that. Obviously the biggest one is just public health, the welfare of our children. . . .
But we had Secretary Levett of HHS in front of the committee, and I said to him and the chairman of the committee, Mr. Obey, that there are some huge issues associated with this.
Obviously one of them is we need to maintain public confidence in our vaccine program. . . .
If it is ever shown scientifically that these kids were getting this terrible condition because of these shots, that the federal government would be liable in court to provide for the health care and in some cases, if they’re really badly disabled, the support of these children for their lifetimes. So this is a very huge issue, not just on a humanitarian level, but as well on a financial level.
Sharyl Attkisson asked Weldon if the government should continue to say there is no link between vaccines and autism.
Weldon:
I wouldn’t recommend they say something like that in light of the Poling case and the admission on the part of the government.
Rep. Weldon called for more research. He said NIH was putting more money into autism research, but they’re not getting any answers.
Weldon:
We haven’t had the good, rigorous independent research that we need, and until we have that, the federal government is going to engender erosion of confidence on the part of the American people.
Attkisson then asked the pivotal question.
Attkisson:
Is there any way to figure out which children might suffer a side effect from vaccines and help make it safer for them?”
Weldon:
That has always been my hope, that there would be some kind of test to determine if a child is prone to a vaccine side effect.
The Poling case is a very interesting one in that regard. There are measurable abnormalities in her metabolism that have been decided in a court of law that played a role in her developing autism in response to the vaccine.
So we may have a simple test that we can do on all newborns and make a determination as to whether they can be safely vaccinated.
Weldon speculated on possibly inventing new vaccines that children prone to vaccine side effects could safely take.
On Jun 19, 2008, Sharyl Attkisson reported on the real significance of the Hannah Poling story in this astonishing article.
After a decade of denying any possible association between vaccines and autism, the government quietly settled a vaccine-autism case last fall. When news of the case leaked out to the public months later, government officials labeled the case of Hannah Poling an ‘anomaly.’
The truth is, nobody is in a position to know whether Hannah's case is an exception. Government officials have told CBS News that they have not tracked vaccine-autism claims to see how many of them might involve children with the same undetected mitochondrial disorder Hannah had... one that may have made her susceptible to side effects from vaccines, triggering her autism.
So what should have happened following the news about Hannah Poling? Certainly this story would shake parents’ confidence in the vaccine program. It should follow that money and effort would be put into robust studies to determine if Hannah’s situation were truly rare, after all, this affects the health outcomes of millions of children receiving routine vaccines.
At the time of Hannah’s concession, it seemed like the medical community and health officials were going to look into the issue of mitochondrial disease. This was the topic at a meeting held on Sunday, June 29, 2008 in Indianapolis.
Attendees included scientists from the FDA, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders, the National Institute of Mental Health, the CDC and HHS.
The article said,
At the heart of the issue for many specialists and concerned parents is whether vaccines -- suspected by some people as being a cause of autism -- might trigger mitochondrial disorders, which lead to autism.
That was a riveting question. What if vaccines themselves caused the mitochondrial disorder? This should have been a major concern for anyone working in the vaccine program.
Dr. Jon Poling was quoted in the story saying,
I guess I kind of feel like it's Christmas Eve. Tomorrow is Christmas morning and, hopefully, those presents will be grants in the form of serious federal monies to look into autism and its relationship to mitochondrial disorders.
The tone of the rest of the ABC story was much different from the sentiments expressed by Dr. Poling. It seemed that a number of people went to the meeting intending to deny that mitochondrial disorder/autism was linked to vaccination.
Experts lined up against the possibility that vaccines played a role here.
Dr. Douglas Wallace, director of the Center for Molecular and Mitochondrial Medicine and Genetics at the University of California-Irvine, was quoted in the piece.
Parents have observed a time association between when their child got vaccinated and when they had a worsening of their clinical state, but just because two things occur at the same time, it doesn't mean that one caused the other.
Dr. Bruce Cohen, a neurologist at the Cleveland Clinic, sounded worried about the fallout from even talking about a link between vaccines and autism.
I think there is some potential of causing undue concern when one hears about situations such as the Hannah Poling case.
Cohen made it sound that even if there is a link, the greater good is served by vaccines.
But when we look at all the benefits of the vaccine program in preventing horrible diseases and horrible deaths, I think you have to take it all into consideration.
At the same time experts were meeting to talk about the Hannah Poling case, evidence was mounting that she wasn’t an isolated case. What Harris revealed showed, once again, the government was also concerned with damage control.
Federal health officials on Sunday will call together some of the world’s leading experts on an obscure disease to discuss the controversial case of a 9-year-old girl from Athens, Ga., who became autistic after receiving numerous vaccinations.
A second case
But the government has so far kept quiet a second case that some say is more disturbing and more relevant to the meeting.
On Jan. 11, a 6-year-old girl from Colorado received FluMist, a flu vaccine, and about a week later “became weak with multiple episodes of falling to ground” and ‘difficulty walking,’ according to a case report filed with federal health officials and obtained by The New York Times.
The girl grew increasingly weak and feverish and ‘became more limp, appears sleepy, acts as if drunk,’ the report said. She was hospitalized and underwent surgery and was finally withdrawn from life support. She died on April 5, according to the report.
Both the 9- and 6-year-olds had mitochondrial disorders, a spectrum of genetic diseases that have received almost no attention from federal health officials. The 9-year-old, Hannah Poling, was 19 months old and developing normally in 2000 when she received five shots against nine infectious diseases. Two days later, she developed a fever, cried inconsolably and refused to walk. In the next seven months, she spiraled downward, and in 2001 doctors diagnosed autism.
No one knows whether vaccinations had anything to do with the girls’ health problems, and the scientific significance of individual cases is always difficult to assess. But suggestions that mitochondrial disorders could be set off or worsened by vaccinations, and that the disorders might be linked to autism, prompted the meeting on Sunday and has brought the disorders sudden national attention.
Immediately there was a massive effort to make this all go away.
Gerberding clearly indicated she wasn’t interested in investigating the Poling case. She talked about “autism-like symptoms,” and she admitted that she hadn’t had time to review the case, although the concession was made in November, 2007 and it was now March 2008.
Gerberding was definite:
What we can say, absolutely for sure, is that we don’t really understand the causes of autism. We’ve got a long way to go before we get to the bottom of this, but there have been a least 15 very good scientific studies and the Institutes of Medicine who have searched this out, and they have concluded that there is really no association between vaccines and autism.
So Hannah Poling’s vaccinations caused her autism, but no one else’s.
Gerberding:
I think we have to have an open mind about this. We know that there’s very little chance something related to a vaccine is going to cause a serious problem for a child.
The message to the public was clear: No one wants to look at vaccines.
She went on to criticize all the focus on vaccines and autism and not other potential causes, referring to autism as “a huge challenge.” Once again, no one at the CDC has ever used the world “crisis” when speaking about autism.
(Two years later Dr. Gerberding moved on to be the head of the vaccine division at Merck.)
In the end, no one would do anything about the link between vaccines and mitochondrial disorders. The story died quickly never to be heard about again in the mainstream press.
It needs to be noted that at the time of the Hannah Poling case in 2008, the official autism rate in the U.S. was one in every 150children, one in 92 boys. In the following years that statistic would keep making huge leaps upward until we’re at today’s rate of one in 36 children, one in 22 boys.
And over the past 17 years, with each increase, officials at the CDC still have no idea what’s causing autism OR if there has ever been a true increase in the number of children affected.
Dr. Weldon’s nomination hearing would have been a perfect opportunity to bring up the Hannah Poling case and the fact that the government conceded her autism was vaccine-induced. Now however, we’ll never get to hear about it.
By Anne Dachel - You can read more from Anne at her SUBSTACK. For now, it appears that the VAXXED series of movies about vaccine injury will have as many sequels as Friday the 13th.
###
The package insert 'was absolutely blank on both sides'
Imagine yourself to be a parent who has faithfully vaccinated their children, never questioning the safety of the childhood schedule. What would this conversation do your trust in vaccinations?
On Daystar TV Polly and Brian talked about their personal stories, each having a vaccine injured child and about Vaxxed 3, the documentary that revealed how the COVID 19 vaccine unleased untold injury and death here in the U.S. and around the world.
Brian Hooker, Polly Tommey on Joni Table Talk
The host, Joni Lamb, opened the discussion with a question:
From the COVID pandemic to cover-up, what’s the truth behind vaccines?
Today’s guests join us to share tragic stories of individuals and families that were impacted by vaccine injuries, and they going to expose the shocking realities the mainstream media will never tell you.
Joni introduced her guests, Dr. Brian Hooker and Polly Tommey.
Joni described this as “one of the most controversial topics of our time, vaccines.”
Joni showed the trailer forVaxxed 3which had multiple examples of people who were injured by the COVID vaccine.
Dr. Hooker recounted the vaccine injury his son suffered as a child 25 years ago. His son was 15 months old and thriving, and after the three vaccines he received during a doctor visit, he had a fever and high pitch screaming. His fever lasted two weeks and afterwards he lost his 15 word vocabulary, couldn’t make eye contact, and suffered from severe bowel disease.
Brian began investigating vaccines back in 2001 and 2002 and discovered “the CDC was actively covering up the relationship between vaccines and autism.”
At that time he embarked on a twofold mission: to recover his son and warn others.
During the 15 minute clip, Kennedy outlined his vision for HHS.
Laura asked him why he talked about prayer at his swearing in ceremony in the Oval Office.
Kennedy;
We’re not just in a health crisis, but we’re in a spiritual crisis. And those things are connected.
Kennedy said Americans have feelings of being alienated and dispossessed. He called this an “existential crisis” for young people.
Seventy-seven percent of our kids can’t qualify for military service. There’s a purposelessness in their lives and no sense of usefulness or effectiveness or connectedness to their communities.
And that drives also the chronic disease epidemic and the epidemic we’re seeing of depression, of suicide, of alcoholism, of drug addiction. I think we have to address all of those things at the same time.
Kennedy called for a change in outlook.
We need to get up in the morning and not think about, what am I going to do to make myself happy today? We have to get up and say, what am I going to do to make myself useful today? . . .
And that paradoxically is ultimately the path to happiness, that connectedness from doing good things, from being of service to others.
Kennedy talked about his experience with addiction and recovery and the need for a spiritual component in life.
On January 29th Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) questioned Robert Kennedy Jr. during his confirmation hearing. On January 29th Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) questioned Robert Kennedy Jr. during his confirmation hearing.
Wyden wasn’t interested in Robert Kennedy’s actual position on vaccines. His rampage was a sign of something more sinister going on.
Kennedy has questions about vaccine safety, and that was enough to disqualify him from any official government office.
Trying to use his words against him
Wyden began by calling Kennedy a liar.
Wyden:
In your testimony today, under oath, you denied you were anti-vaccine, but during a podcast interview in July of 2023, you said, ‘No vaccine is safe and effective.’
Note: That doll belonged to my sister. It's called "Hedda Get Bedda," and featured three faces, that turned using the pom pom on her hat. One face was sleeping. One face was smiling. One face had measles (see the hole for a thermometer?) The autism rate was 1 in 10,000 when Hedda was under the Christmas tree.
By Anne Dachel
Why RFK Jr. is the only person who can fix the regulatory agencies
'There’s nobody that will fix it the way that I do'
In this seven minute video we get a clear picture of what’s going to happen with Kennedy leading HHS from what was said at his recent hearing in D.C.
Senator Ron Johnson begins by talking about the attacks on Kennedy and the need to come together to focus on what’s making us the sickest generation in history. He describes how the health agencies uniformly stonewalled his efforts to get information under President Biden. He asks what Kennedy is going to do to change things.
I think the country is waking up to what many of us in the autism community have understood for years: These agencies are not here to promote the health of Americans. They don’t care how sick we are, especially our children.
What the regulators are really doing involves corruption, collusion, conflicts and cover-up, and Kennedy will end the corporate capture that has gone on for decades.
I can’t say I’m surprised by the hostility on the other side.
I’m highly disappointed in it.
I don’t know if you remember when you called me up and you were contemplating setting your political differences aside, joining forces with President Trump on an area of agreement, addressing chronic illness, trying to find the root cause of all these problems facing this nation.
My first response was, Bobby, this is the answer to my prayers. We need to get the answers of this, but even more, we need to health and unify this divided nation.
I’m not necessarily the most optimistic guy because we have enormous challenges facing this nation. But I thought, wow, here’s somebody from the left, somebody I don’t agree with on many issues politically, coming together with President Trump and focusing on an area of agreement, something that the American people desperately want, finding out the answers.
What has caused autism?
What is causing chronic illness?
Mr Kennedy, I think I’ve come to know what’s in your heart. I think I know the personal and political price you’ve paid to this decision.
I want to say publically, I thank you for that. I truly appreciate what you’re doing here.
Can’t we come together as a nation and do this? Aren’t you getting tired of this? I’m getting tired of this.
Mr. Kennedy, I need to enter in the record. These are just eleven letters of support signed by 63,000 people, thousands of doctors, from the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons, Independent Medical Alliance, North Carolina Physicians and Freedom Group, Governor Jeff Landry from Louisiana.
These are Americans, non-partisan. A lot of these people I know because I’ve advocated with you. A lot of them are Democrats. They put their political differences aside. . . .
I’ve written over 70 oversight letters to the federal health agencies under the Biden administration; I’ve virtually gotten squat out of them.
We get, for example, 50 pages of Anthony Fauci’s emails.
Redacted.
The latest one was 17 pages. Instead of issuing a health alert on the myocarditis they knew was impacting young men early in 2021, instead of issuing an alert on the health alert network, they developed 17 pages of talking points.
This was given to the public under a FOIA request; they had to go to court.
They’ve got a new way of redacting. They don’t black things out; they just give you white pages, so you don’t even know what they have redacted.
I’ve issued a subpoena now to cover the information I’ve requested in 70 oversight letters. My question to you, as Secretary of HHS, will you honor these requests from Congress and will you make HHS transparent?
Robert Kennedy: My approach to HHS is radical transparency. Democrats and Republicans ought to be able to come in and get information that was generated at taxpayer expense that is owned by the American taxpayer. They shouldn’t get redacted documents. Public health agencies should be transparent.
If we want to restore trust in the public health agencies, we need transparency.
I want to say something about what you first said. When I first launched my campaign, it was about uniting Americans, Democrats and Republicans.
There’s no issue that should unite us more than this chronic health epidemic. There’s no such thing as Republican children or Democratic children.
These are our kids. Sixty-six percent of them are damaged. I know what a healthy kid looks like because I had so many of them in my family.
I didn’t know anybody with a food allergy growing up, peanut allergy.
What do five of my kids have allergies? Why are we seeing these explosions in diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, neurological diseases, depression, all these things that are related to toxins in the environment?
Why can’t we just agree with each other? Put differences about so many issues, intractable issues aside, and say, we’re going to end this.
I don’t think anybody is going to be able to do this like I am because of my peculiar experience, because I’ve litigated these agencies. When you litigate against them, you get a PhD in corporate capture and how to unravel it.
I’ve written six books about these agencies. I know a lot about them, and I know how to fix it.
There’s nobody that will fix it the way that I do because I’m not scared of vested interests. I don’t care.
I’m not here because I want a position or a job. I have a very good life and a happy family. This is something I don’t need.
I want to do this because we’re going to fix it.
We are attracting now a caliber of people now to HHS like never before in history. They’re entrepreneurs; they’re disrupters, innovators of immense talent that are walking away, many of them, from growing concerns.
They’re not coming there for positions. They’re coming there because they want to save our country, and they’re from across the political spectrum.
All these Democrats are opposed to me for partisan issues. They used to be my friends. They agreed with me on all the environmental issues that I’ve been working on for my whole career.
Now they’re against me because anything that President Trump does, any decision that he makes has to be lampooned, derided, discredited, marginalized, vilified.
Anne Dachel shares Senator Ron Johnson's discussion of Robert Kennedy, Jr. on News Nation as Kennedy sits for his HHS hearings yesterday and today. Emotions are running high on social media. It's difficult not to give in to the scrum. Tempting. Exasperating. Follow us on X for how we are reacting and hopefully, educating. www.x.com/ageofautism
NEWS NATION: RFK Jr. will focus on science not profit: Sen. Ron Johnson
Anchor: Let’s talk about these hearings this week. We anticipate there will be some interesting back and forth to say the least.
You predicted that R.F.K. Jr. will sail through his confirmation hearing, yet he has zero medical training. What makes you so confident he’ll get confirmed?
Senator Johnson: First of all, I’ve gotten to know Bobby. He’s very intelligent. He’s a good person. He is going to base his opinions on science. I also know a lot of the lies that have been told about him, as well as the concerns expressed by my colleagues when I did an unofficial check.
Those conversations all pretty much went the same way: There’s a lot that Bobby Kennedy’s doing that I love, but—
There were about three or four common concerns people had, and I know exactly how he’s going to answer those concerns. I think he can alleviate those concerns.
RFK at HHS, the last hope for our children Kennedy needs to wake up the world to the existential crisis we are all facing
By Anne Dachel
Saying that our only hope is to have Robert Kennedy, Jr. at HHS may sound like hyperbole, but looking carefully at where we are today, it is undeniably valid.
Over the past several decades we have become a nation of the chronically ill and disabled, and this is especially true when we focus on our children. I can say this based on my experience as both a mother and a teacher, witnessing firsthand the decline of children.
The people who are supposedly in charge of health care aren’t there to promote the interests of Americans. Instead, their first allegiance is to corporations that have infiltrated every aspect of government oversight.
I recently wrote about the past 25 years of obfuscation and denial from officials at the Centers for Disease Control when it comes to the increases in autism, and that is only one example of the rampant malfeasance in our oversight agencies.
And I can confidently predict that when the CDC gets around to updating the official U.S. autism rate, probably to coincide with the celebrations during April, Autism Awareness/Acceptance Month, our numbers will be close to other places with even higher rates, and like every increase over the past 25 years, officials will have no idea what’s driving the numbers or if there is really more autism.
We are now so used to these increases, we just accepted things, no matter how bad the numbers. No one asks questions, and no one bothers to speculate on when these increases will end. Lots of places have rates higher than the one in 36 in the U.S., but no one is worried. It’s expected by now. Read Anne's full article at her SUBSTACK HERE.
The world has witnessed an explosion in autism over the past 25 years. A once almost unknown disability is now seen by health officials and mainstream medicine as a normal and acceptable part of childhood. Doctors are most often given credit for the soaring rate of autism due to their “better diagnosing” compared to doctors in the past.
The successive increases in the rate of autism since 2000 have never been a cause for concern for those running health care in the U.S. Incredibly, autism, the disorder that is always affecting more and more children with no known cause, cure or prevention has never even been labeled a “crisis” by anyone at the Centers for Disease Control.
For years officials have poured millions of dollars into dead-end, taxpayer funded research linking autism to mothers (much like the “refrigerator mom” claim of the 1950s and 60s): fat moms, drinking moms, smoking moms, old moms, moms who marry old dads, moms who have preemies, moms who have babies too close together, moms who live too close to freeways, moms with low levels of D3, moms who carry Neanderthal DNA, specific fatty acid in cord blood, moms on antidepressants, and BPA exposure during pregnancy.
These are the supposed “environmental” factors related to the increase in autism, IF there is an increase.
All this busywork science leaves autism as the perpetual mystery doctors have all the time in the world to figure out.
THIS HAS TO STOP
It is my hope that with a new President who has vowed to end the chronic disease epidemic in America, we might finally honestly and thoroughly address the autism epidemic as the national health care crisis that it clearly is.
FOR DECADES health officials at the CDC have virtually ignored autism. Their phony studies funded by NIH grants have created the façade that there is real research going on, but nothing ever changes except for the fact that there is always more autism.
In 1994 the definition of autism in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) was expanded to include milder autism, specifically Asperger’s. This led to the claim that there is more autism because the diagnosis was broadened over 30 years ago.
Since 2004, when the autism rate was one in every 166 children, one in every 102 boys, the rate has only increased, and each and every update in the rate was typically attributed to better diagnosing, greater awareness, broader definition, in addition to the possibility of unknown environmental factors.
Each pronouncement from officials at the CDC was given media attention briefly, usually coinciding with the blue lights and celebrations of April, Autism Awareness/Acceptance Month.
Media failure
The media, both print and broadcast, never ask officials uncomfortable questions like:
When are the increases going to finally stop?
Why can’t researchers figure out what causes autism”
Why are there always more boys with autism?
Why do some children start out normally developing and then lose learned skills, ending up with autism?
It seems officials are never embarrassed by their ignorance about autism. Looking over the decades of continuous increases, it is obvious that autism has never been a priority for anyone at the CDC. Their mission has been to cover up the autism epidemic.
This is the history of autism in the U.S.
2007, one in every 150 children has autism (one in 92 boys)
CBS News reported on a study showing the rate had increased from one in 166 to one in 150 eight year olds in the U.S.
CDC officials pointed out that the new figures don't represent all U.S. children, or show whether autism is increasing in the U.S.
Marshalynn Yeargin-Allsopp, MD,chief of the developmental disabilities branch at the CDC said the study“was designed to provide ‘more consistent and reliable estimates.’”
She was quoted saying, ‘It is extremely difficult to accurately estimate the number of children who have an ASD.’
CDC director Julie Gerberdingsaid,‘Our estimates are becoming better and more consistent, though we can't yet tell if there is a true increase in ASDs or if the changes are the result of our better studies.’
Yeargin-Allsopp described autism as an ‘urgent public health issue.’
2009, one in every 110 children has autism (one in 68 boys)
ABC News reported that the CDC “did not rule out increased surveillance and other factors as being responsible for the higher numbers.”
Dr. Catherine Rice at the CDC's National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities said, ‘It's impossible to say how much is a true increase and how much is in identification.’
‘A simple explanation is not apparent.’
‘The CDC considers this a significant public health concern. This helps us know that it's important to look for causes of autism and to take these data to help us intervene for those individuals who are here now.’
2012, one in every 88 children has autism (one in 54 boys)
The Washington Post published, Federal study estimates 1 in 88 children has symptoms of autism, in which there was no urgency about autism despite the big jump in the rate.
About 1 in 88 children in the United States has autism and the prevalence of the condition has risen nearly 80 percent over the past decade, federal health officials reported Thursday.
The survey, sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, is the latest evidence of a steady upward trend in a disorder whose cause remains unknown despite much research in recent years.
The rising rate of autism could be the result of finding children missed in earlier surveys or an actual increase in the condition — or a combination of the two.
Thomas R. Frieden, CDC’s director, was quoted saying that the higher numbers could just be ‘the result of better detection. It is a possibility.’ He went on to call for early intervention.
It's possible the rise is entirely due to better detection of autism, Dr. Thomas Frieden, director of the CDC, said at a press conference about the study. We know that doctors and communities are getting better at identifying children with autism. But whether this explains all of the rise is not known, Frieden said.
Autism cases are on the rise again, largely due to wider screening and better diagnosis, federal health officials said Thursday.
The rate of U.S. cases of autism and related disorders rose to about 1 in 88 children. The previous estimate was 1 in 110. . . .
Health officials attribute the increase largely to better recognition of cases, through wide screening and better diagnosis. But the search for the cause of autism is really only beginning, and officials acknowledge that other factors may be helping to drive up the numbers.
"We're not quite sure the reasons for the increase," said Coleen Boyleof the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Stobbe did include Dr. Arthur Caplan director from the University of Pennsylvania's Center for Bioethics, who used the new rate as proof that vaccines don’t cause autism.
“The fact that autism rates continue to grow at an incredible rate makes it imperative that we find out why. But it should end the discussion about the causal role played by vaccines. The rate of growth is simply inconsistent with anything having to do with vaccination.”
2014, one in every 68 children has autism (one in 42 boys)
On CNNColeen Boyle once again admitted that officials don’t know if more children actually have autism.
One in 68 U.S. children has an autism spectrum disorder (ASD), a 30% increase from 1 in 88 two years ago, according to a new report released Thursday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
“We look at all of the characteristics of autism,” says Coleen Boyle, the director of the CDC’s National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities.
The report is not designed to say why more children are being diagnosed with autism, Boyle says. But she believes increased awareness in identifying and diagnosing children contributes to the higher numbers.
The increased autism rates be a combination of increased awareness, better diagnosis by doctors and communities, and increased prevalence, said Boyle.
USA Today told everyone not to worry about the increase too.
What's still unknown is the driver of that increase. Many experts believe the rise is largely due to better awareness and diagnosis rather than a true increase in the number of children with the condition.
"We don't know the extent those factors explain in terms of the increase, but we clearly know they do play a role," said Coleen Boyle,director of the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities at the CDC. "Our system tells us what's going on. It (only) gives us clues as to the why."
The aging of parents is also known to be a factor; the chances of autism increase with the age of parents at conception. . . .
Despite their concern, experts said they were not surprised by the increase, because otherdata had suggested the numbers would continue to climb. In New Jersey, for instance, autism rates were 50% higher than in the rest of the nation in 2000, and they remained that much higher in 2010 – suggesting the national rates will continue to rise to catch up, said Walter Zahorodny, a psychologist who directs the New Jersey Autism Study. "To me it seems like autism prevalence can only get higher," he said.
2018, one in every 59 children has autism (one in 36 boys)
CNNpublished a piece citing Daisy Christensen,an epidemiologist at the CDC who readily admitted that officials still don’t understand the increases in autism.
One in 59 US children has autism, according to a new report from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The new estimate is a prevalence rate of 1.7%, up from one in every 68 children (1.5%) in the 2016 report, which was based on data from 2012. . . .
The new estimate represents a 15% increase from two years prior and a 150% increase since 2000. . . .
The new government data can’t tell us exactly why the increase has occurred, Daisy Christensen said. “One of the main things we note this year is that the difference in prevalence between white and black children and between white and Hispanic children has decreased.” . . .
Environmental risk contributing to autism
Thomas Frazier, chief science officer at Autism Speaks pointed to other factors.
“We’re waiting longer to have kids, and older parents are more likely to have a child with autism, and premature babies are living at rates that they didn’t use to live at, so those babies are at risk for autism,” he said, adding that there are probably other unknown risk factors.
2020, one in every 54 children has autism (one in 33 boys)
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released today its biennial update of autism's estimated prevalence among the nation's children, based on an analysis of 2016 medical and/or school records of 8-year-olds from 11 monitoring sites across the United States. The new report demonstrates real progress in early screening and diagnosis, the result of more than a decade of awareness and advocacy work by Autism Speaks and other organizations.
On CNN, CDC director Thomas Frieden once again credited doctorsfor ‘getting better at diagnosing autism.’
“Doctors are getting better at diagnosing autism; communities are getting much better at [providing] services to children with autism, and CDC scientists are getting much better at tracking which kids in the communities we’re studying have autism,” Frieden says.
“How much of that increase is a result of better tracking and how much of it is a result of an actual increase, we still don’t know. We know more about autism today than we have ever known,” he says, “but there is still so much we don’t know and wish that we knew.”
2021, one in every 44 children has autism (one in 27 boys)
The AAP News ran the story, Autism rate rises to 1 in 44, early identification improves, which attributed the increase to better diagnosing.
One in 44 8-year-old children has been identified as having autism spectrum disorder, a rate that continues to rise and indicates a need to make sure supports are in place for them, experts said.
The rate reported Thursday in the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report is up from one in 54 children two years prior. Experts said they can’t rule out environmental factors contributing to the increase but also pointed to improvements in screening and diagnosing children. . . .
“The substantial progress in early identification is good news because the earlier that children are identified with autism, the sooner they can be connected to services and support,” [CDC’s] National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities Director Karen Remley, M.D., M.P.H., M.B.A., FAAP, said in a press release. . . .
‘These kiddos’
“General pediatricians are very critical to addressing this need,” she said. “With more children being diagnosed, that tells me pediatricians are doing more and more to screen and identify these kiddos. And I think the more that pediatricians engage in understanding autism, the more that pediatricians can play a role in community-based diagnosis.”
Experts believe the increase in U.S. autism numbers reflects more awareness and wider availability of services.
New autism numbers released Thursday suggest more U.S. children are being diagnosed with the developmental condition and at younger ages. . . .
U.S. autism numbers have been on the rise for several years, but experts believe that reflects more awareness and wider availability of services to treat the condition rather than a true increase in the number of affected children. . . .
“There is some progress being made and the earlier kids get identified, the earlier they can access services that they might need to improve their developmental outcome,” said CDC researcher and co-authorKelly Shaw.
The CDC released 2018 data on Thursday from nearly a dozen states that showed, among 8-year-olds, 1 in 44 had been diagnosed with autism. In 2016, the number was 1 in 54 children for the same age group. While autism numbers have grown consistently over the years, experts believe the increase is due to raised awareness and access to treatment services, not the number of children who have autism.
2023, one in every 36 U.S. children has autism (one in 22 boys)
As usual, greater awareness was cited as the reason for the increase.
AAP News: CDC:Autism rate rises to 1 in 36 children
The prevalence of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has grown to one in 36 (2.8%) 8-year-olds, according to a new report. . . .
The overall rate reported Thursday in the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report is up from one in 44 8-year-olds two years prior.
“We can’t say for sure, but we suspect this is due to increased awareness leading to more children being identified with autism,” Karen Remley,M.D., M.B.A., M.P.H., FAAP, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, said in a press conference.
It is easy to predict at this point that the next autism update (probably by April, 2025) will put our rate in line with other places with even more stunning numbers.
In classrooms today, an estimated 4% [1 in 25] of seven- to 14-year-olds now have a primary diagnosis of autism, while between 6% and 10% of children have ADHD.
1 in 22 4-year-old children were children were 1.5 times as likely Or 4.5% of 8-year-old children to be identifed with ASD as identifed with ASD by the were identifed with ASD by the CA-ADDM program in 2020.
This kind of service is needed more now than it ever has been, as figures published this year by the Department of Health reveal that 14,000 children between the ages of four and 15 have an autism diagnosis - around 4.7 per cent [1 in 21] of the school population.
Overall rates in our 4-year-olds of one in 53. And what we were seeing in our Somali 4-year-olds were rates of one in 16.
How long will this malfeasance continue? The agency that gets billions to oversee health care in the U.S. has passively looked on as more and more of our children were diagnosed with autism over the past quarter of a century. They don’t know any more today than they did in 2000.
Who regulates the regulators?
The only fact they are totally sure of is that their always-expanding vaccine program is in no way linked to the rate of autism, and they have the final say.
Addressing autism in this country cannot remain in the hands of people so conflicted, inept and unconcerned about what it is doing to our children. We need honest answers from those who see the autism epidemic as an existential emergency, which it clearly is.
Note: I live in Connecticut. We lost our school's religious vaccine exemption a few years ago, and have only a medical exemption that's nearly impossible to to get. That said, we have decent budgets for people with autism AND IQ (testable) under 70. For those with IQ that tests over 70? Or those who do not need IQ testing? We are as much as wasteland as any state in the Union. And lack of adult services, employment and housing is a huge problem. We have a crisis.
Our Senator Chris Murphy said something unconscionable during an interview. He said Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. wants to kill children - referring to Kennedy's discussion of vaccines. Nothing could be further from the truth. But Yale has a strong influence here in Connecticut, as does the pharmaceutical industry. I think Murphy cares about the Nutmeg state's kids. But he is powerfully influenced by industry too. Massachusetts (our neighbor) Senator Elizabeth Warren has been positively RABID about Kennedy, proclaiming that he wants polio to return at every opportunity. Again. Untrue. Funny, these politicians ONLY focus on Kennedy's vaccination stance, never his myriad other changes in terms of food, water, health. Just the vaccines.
###
By Anne Dachel
Sen. Chris Murphy Needs to Start Caring about the Children of Connecticut
During an interview with Dr. Drew Pinsky on the Ingraham Angle on January 6th, Laura Ingraham included a 20 second clip of Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy that blatantly lied about the aims of HHS nominee, Robert Kennedy, Jr. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMNy09fRrvw
Murphy put on a histrionic display of fear over what Kennedy wants to do. It was right out of the Sen. Elizabeth Warren playbook where she announced RFK is “welcoming a return to polio.”
Okay, he wants to ban pharmaceutical advertising. That’s nice.
He also wants to kill our kids by withdrawing vaccines from our schools and taking fluoride out of our drinking water.
Of course any normal person listening to Kennedy’s plans to eliminate the “corporate capture” of our regulatory agencies knows Warren and Murphy are just making up their own narrative.
Why not demand independent double blind studies for vaccines, like any other pharmaceutical product?
Over the past 20 years I’ve written many times about the REALLY BIG LIE ABOUT AUTISM, namely that there aren’t more children with autism today. We’re better at recognizing it; doctors are better at diagnosing it.
If we’re told that over and over, everyone will believe it, and it’s working.
Without exception, whenever there’s a new, higher autism rate in the U.S, someone from the Centers for Disease Control will be there to reassure us that the new numbers don’t represent a true increase.
The mainstream media universally promotes this absurd claim. This has led to seeing autism as just part of neurodiversity, something to be accepted and celebrated every April during Autism Awareness Month.
Instilling this in the minds of the American public is critical for those who deny that the dramatic increase in the childhood vaccine schedule is directly linked to the explosion in the autism rate. IF there has always been autism like this, unrecognized, then giving kids more vaccines has nothing to do with it.
We allow the same people who approve the vaccine schedule and who have endless money ties to the vaccine industry to scratch their collective heads when it comes to what causes autism.
Mainstream news outlets and corporate controlled TV networks can be expected to deny that vaccines do bad things to kids like cause autism, ADHD and a host of autoimmune disorders. After all, pharmaceutical ads pretty much fund news coverage.
Autism, the developmental disorder that officially affects one in every 36 U.S. children, one in every 22 boys and is expected to continue to get even worse, has no known cause, prevention or cure.
Relatively unknown until the end of the 20th century, autism has become a household word. We have a whole month every April where we joyfully light up famous monuments around the world in blue lights in celebration of autism. By now, we all pretty much assume autism will remain a perpetual puzzle.
The autism puzzle
Health officials at the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta dutifully give us updates on the autism rate every couple of years, usually coinciding with the festivities of Autism Acceptance Month in April.
NO ONEat the CDC has ever admitted a true increase in the autism rate. It is always due to greater awareness, better diagnosing by doctors.
NO ONE at the CDC can speculate on when exactly doctors will finally figure out the true autism numbers. (HINT: Since the rate in California is one in 22 and in Florida, it’s almost one in 20, it’s easy to see where this is going.)
NO ONE at the CDC is ever worried about autism. Since I’ve been following everything they put out for the past 20 years, I can say conclusively that no one there has used the word “crisis” when talking about autism. “Serious public health concern” is the strongest language I’ve ever seen when it comes to autism.
NO ONE at the CDC has ever been able to show us a comparable rate of autism among adults, but they’re satisfied that they’re out there.
THE LATEST AUTISM NEWS
Just now President Biden signed the reauthorization of the Autism CARES Act.
Tucker Carlson: “I’m about as uncomfortable as I’ve ever been in an interview right now.”
On December 27th, Tucker Carlson aired an interview with attorney Aaron Siri. Siri had recently been demonized by the New York Times as Robert Kennedy, Jr.’s attorney and someone who wanted to end the polio vaccine.
NBC News immediately expressed equal outrage over ending the polio vaccine.
NBC featured Senator Elizabeth Warren attacking Kennedy for wanting to bring back polio along with criticism from Senator Mitch McConnell.
The lawyer in question, Aaron Siri, got a chance to defend himself in the hour and 45 minute interview with Carlson.
All I can say is that what was discussed during the interview can genuinely be called eye-opening for first time listeners and toward the end, it was truly “grotesque,” to quote Carlson.
First of all, what the Times and the other mainstream outlets that followed their lead published was A LIE.
Siri did not call for ending polio vaccine access, and his work had nothing to do with Robert Kennedy.
Thank you to Anne Dachel for sharing this letter from Medicos Pela Vida - Doctors For Life for Kennedy's appointment to head up Health and Human Services. Doctors in Brazil and Latin America that is. Meanwhile, American physicians and politicians are spreading as much disinformation as they can about just two topics from the vast realm of health and human services; polio and measles. Senator Elizabeth Warren in Massachusetts is rabidly telling Americans, "You'll lose your smile and you'll say hello to polio" on X. The playbook is worn thin, and yet, the scare tactics have worked in the past.
Mr. Kennedy’s nomination represents an unparalleled chance to restore the health of the American nation and renews confidence in its healthcare institutions.
To the United States Senators of the 119th Congress:
We, the undersigned physicians, citizens of Brazil and Latin American countries, write to urge you to seize this historic opportunity to address the United States’ chronic disease crisis by confirm Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS).
The stakes could not be higher. The chronic disease epidemic now threatens our nation’s future—undermining human capital, compromising national security, and straining our economy to the breaking point. In the early 1980s, fewer than 13% of U.S. children suffered from a chronic condition. Today, that figure has soared to nearly 60%, and an alarming 77% of young adults are ineligible for military service due to health issues. Chronic disease and mental health now account for 90% of the nation’s $4.3 trillion in annual healthcare expenditures. These trends are not just unsustainable—they are existential.
This letter reflects the collective voice of physicians and medical professionals committed to reversing these devastating trends. We believe Robert F. Kennedy Jr. possesses the vision, integrity, and leadership essential for this critical moment in public health. His unwavering commitment to scientific transparency and his determination to address the root causes of illness make him uniquely qualified to lead HHS.
Mr. Kennedy’s nomination represents an unparalleled chance to restore the health of the American nation and renews confidence in its healthcare institutions. He has pledged to return federal health agencies to their tradition of evidence-based science, ensuring accountability and transparency at every level. His commonsense policy priorities—including removing harmful substances from our food, water, and medicines—are grounded in the urgent need to combat the chronic disease epidemic and to Make America Healthy Again.
Of course, we could name many more men and women who have been sounding the alarm for decades, often at great personal expense, including every contributor to Age of Autism. But nothing in this world that is important comes without risk, heartache and difficulty. None of which compares to what our dear children who have been vaccine injured face every single day.
In a world where fact and fiction often blur, discerning reality has become increasingly challenging. Artificial intelligence and corrupt media outlets contribute to a landscape where truth is obscured and misinformation reigns. AI-generated deepfake videos and sophisticated AI-driven text generation can create highly convincing but false narratives, making it nearly impossible to tell what is real.
The vaccine movement, in particular, has a propensity for co-option by bad actors with substantial platforms, which can make it difficult for even the most diligent insiders to determine who is friend or foe. We find ourselves in an era of limited hangouts, designed to provoke infighting, while the true power brokers accumulate more wealth and control. These distractions serve to divert our attention away from some of today’s most critical issues—including vaccine-related harms, expanding social control mechanisms and the cleverly disguised war of central bankers on the people.1
By Anne Dachel - subscribe to Anne's Substack here.
On December 3rd Newsweek put out an opinion piece that was remarkable. (Newsweek also added this disclaimer at the end: “The views expressed in this article are the writer's own,” in case anyone would think that the editorial board supported this kind of thinking.)
The greatest threat to vaccine trust in America isn't Robert F. Kennedy J.—it's the medical establishment itself.
Trust in public health is crumbling. While Donald Trump's nominee for secretary of health and human services is seen as the face of the anti-vaccine movement, the real problem is the medical establishment's own willingness to embrace partisan politics over evidence-based science.
While Ms. Manning didn’t say she supported any of Kennedy’s claims, she did say that the medical establishment has brought this on themselves. Mainstream medicine has become too politicized and has lost public trust, according to Manning.
Take a walk down memory lane with Anne Dachel while the media has a meltdown over the HIDEOUS concept of improving health. Our annual matching gift program is underway. If you can donate, thank you!
As expected, the major cable outlets lost no time in bashing President Trump’s pick to head HHS, Robert Kennedy, Jr.
As someone who’s monitored news coverage of the autism epidemic for the past 20 years, I knew exactly what would happen.
First, concerned news anchors would announce how dangerous it is for the health of Americans, especially children, to have Kennedy in a position of power over U.S. health care. They would label him as “anti-vaccine” and a “conspiracy theorist.” We’d be told that all the science is in, and there is no link between vaccines and things like autism.
Second, they would interview an equally concerned medical “expert” from some prestigious university or hospital who’d recount all the lives saved from communicable diseases because of vaccines. They’d also warn that children will be dying if parents don’t vaccinate.
Dr. Celine Gounder, medical contributor: Vaccines, to be very clear, do not, NOT, cause autism. . . . It’s also a red herring for people whose kids have autism, who they themselves have autism. You’re distracting from the kind of research and treatments that might actually help those kids.
On November 1st, Psychology Today published a report with the title, New Study Reports Dramatic Increase in Autism Prevalence, by Amy Lutz, a medical historian.
This headline wasn’t really alarming. By now, everyone is used to 20 years of always increasing rates of autism with no real explanation. This was no different.
We were reminded that rate increases are expected.
JAMA article confirms what we already knew about autism. But what does it mean?
A new study published in JAMA reported that autism prevalence dramatically increased between 2011-2022.
That autism prevalence has been steadily increasing is not controversial, and it is not news. Hotly contested, however, is why. The Kaiser Permanente paper briefly references some of the more common explanations, including increased awareness, environmental factors, changes in screening practices, diagnostic criteria and others, but doesn’t pick a side: “We didn’t have the data to do that,” Grosvenor told me. “The goal of our study wasn’t to determine the possible causes.”
More autism among the youngest
But his team’s findings do problematize some of these theories. For example, the paper reports a 352 percent increase in the number of autistic children aged 0-4 between 2011 and 2022. . . .
Enough awareness, it’s all about acceptance
By 2012, the public was so aware that The Autistic Self Advocacy Network was calling to replace “Autism Awareness” with “Autism Acceptance.”
It’s very difficult to imagine there was much room for awareness to increase over the decade under study, never mind that it could increase enough to cause autism prevalence to more than quadruple in the youngest age group.
Still no answers
[Lead author of the study, Luke]Grosvenor considers this magnitude of increase too great to be accounted for by just one factor. When I ask him whether he thinks the increased prevalence might represent a real and dramatic increase in the number of autistic children, he acknowledges, “We can’t rule that out as a possibility.”
In the wake of President Donald Trump’s amazing victory in the 2024 election, I feel like it is also a victory for THE TRUTH ABOUT AUTISM.
President Trump has promised that Robert Kennedy, Jr. will have a leading role in the movement to MAKE AMERICA HEALTHY AGAIN by focusing on the chronic disease epidemic. For so many of us parents, this means honestly addressing what autism is doing to America’s children.
My son John is 38 and has mild autism. When he was diagnosed in second grade, the school system had to get a psychologist from Minneapolis to come a hundred miles to Chippewa Falls, WI to diagnose him because, as we were told, autism was such a rare disorder.
My town is around 14,000 people, and we learned that John was probably the only child here who had autism. That was a devastating blow to my husband and me. I was a teacher myself, and I had never known a student with autism. We felt totally alone.
I did lots of research and basically learned that autism is a genetic disorder. We found a local MD who told us that my husband and I were genetically mismatched, and that’s why John had autism.
Then incredibly, things changed in the years that followed. I kept reading about more and more children with autism. Starting after 2000, the rate kept making enormous gains every couple of years, always attributed to “better diagnosing,” “expanded spectrum” and “greater awareness.”
Among the younger students, suddenly autism became a recognized disorder. We were all pretty much convinced that autism had always been here like this, we just called it something else. We were told that parents used to keep these children at home, or they were previously put in institutions.
At first, as the increases showed no signs of slowing down, there were hearings on Capitol Hill, and people seemed willing to listen to parents who talked about how their normally developing children lost learned skills and regressed after routine childhood vaccinations.
Reporters like Sharyl Attkisson honestly covered the link between vaccines and autism. In 2011 it was revealed that the government had secretly compensated over 80 vaccine injury cases that resulted in a child becoming autistic.
What followed was damage control by those with strong financial ties to the vaccine program. Medical organizations, federal health officials and the media, all under the power and control of the pharmaceutical industry, massively shut down any discussion of a link between vaccines and autism. Pharma-funded researchers produced easily manipulated population studies all showing no link between vaccines and autism. The media denounced anyone who wouldn’t believe that the science was in, calling them anti-vaccine and dangerous.
Autism was left as a mystery. Endless studies came out linking the disorder to the mother, much like the claim of a link to the “refrigerator mom” of the 1950s and 1960s.
20 years of phony science
Blame-the-mom studies found associations between autism and old moms, moms who married old dads, fat moms, drinking moms, smoking moms, moms on drugs, moms who lived too close to freeways, moms who had babies too close together, moms on antidepressants and most recently, moms who expose their children to plastic particles while pregnant.
All this research didn’t prove anything, and it was never meant to. NIH and other funders were happy to give grants to dead-end studies like these. I like to call it all, autism busywork because it made the public think that officials wanted to understand autism, which of course, they had no intention of doing.
Then in 2008, Autism Speaks launched the first April, Autism Awareness Month to further normalize and celebrate the disorder. Places like Niagara Falls, the Empire State Building, the White House, the Sydney Opera House in Australia and the statue of Christ the Redeemer in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil are among the 16,000 iconic places around the world that go blue each April in recognition of autism.
Awareness of autism has now become acceptance of autism, no matter what heights the rate eventually reaches. It’s all good. Places around the world are now vying to become recognized as “autism friendly” and “Certified Autism Centers,” which actually makes good sense business-wise considering the never-ending increases in autism.
What’s missing of course is any recognition that autism a devastating disorder that robs a child of normal development and impacts the entire family. Every April, when there’s all kinds of feel-good news coverage of autism, we see lots of kids who look pretty typical, interacting with teachers and therapists. It’s easy to believe autism has always been here like this.
Missing is any reporting on the third of children on the spectrum who experience unexplainable regression or the third of children who are clinically non-verbal or the third of children who engage in self-harm or the third of children with autism who are prone to escaping from their caregivers.
We don’t hear about the parents caring for adult non-verbal children still in diapers. These are the people increasingly desperate about what will happen to their children after they are no longer able to care for them.
Here is an article I wrote 10 years ago that illustrates exactly what I mean. I wrote this after I found the story of Brandon Guppy and his mother, Michelle, and was so moved by the photo of the two of them.
The photo really needs no words. It's a mother with her disabled son. The young man in diapers is the side of autism we never see in feel good stories during April, Celebrate Autism Month. The photo made me think of Michelangelo's Pieta, the Virgin Mary grieving as she holds the body of her crucified son, Jesus. Or maybe one of the Mary Cassatt paintings of a mother and child. The image of this maternal bond is universal. It's also heartbreaking when it involves someone who was left like this because of the vaccines he received as baby. . .
I interviewed Michelle, and she told me about how her healthy baby boy declined after each round of vaccinations ending up profoundly disabled. I recorded her sharp criticism of the media for covering up the truth about autism. I would ask everyone to hit the link and read what she had to say.
I think that the Jama report is meant to prepare us for yet another leap ahead in the autism rate this April. One in 36 could easily become one in 30 or one in 25.
Currently the autism rate in Australia is one in every 25 children.
In Scotland, it’s one in every 23 children.
In California, it’s one in every 22 children.
In Ireland, it’s one in every 21 children.
And in Northern Ireland, it’s one in every 20 children.
None of the above official rates raised any alarms when they were faithfully reported in the press over the last two years. And when our new rate comes out, U.S. health officials will briefly mention it and quickly move on.
THINGS HAVE TO CHANGE before every child born eventually ends up on the autism spectrum. With Trump back in the White House and Kennedy in a position of power, it’s time to end the autism lies. We need to admit that what we call autism is vaccine damage. We have to stop the epidemic NOW.
Note: We have endorsed health since the day we launched some 18 years ago. MAHA is deep in our wheelhouse. We do not endorse candidates, we're not endorsing Trump in this post. If VP Harris announces her plan to combat the poor health of American children, we will be happy to share. I did a search for Kamala Harris Autism on Google. The primary hit was a speech she made about disability in 2022 that began, "I am Kamala Harris and my pronouns are "She" and "Her." What's ironic about that is many of our children with autism mangle their pronouns. Mine sure do.
###
By Anne Dachel
FOX NEWS: RFK, Jr. and Calley Means
Getting the word out about BIG PHARMA, BIG FOOD AND BIG AG
WHY ARE KIDS BEING POISONED AND THEN DRUGGED FOR PROFIT?
WHY IS 70 PERCENT OF OUR KIDS’ DIET ULTRA PROCESSED FOOD, AND THEN 40 PERCENT OF TEENS ARE ON A PHARMACEUTICAL?
As the election gets closer, FoxNews is giving airtime to those who are planning to help Trump MAKE AMERICA HEALTHY AGAIN.
In separate interviews, Calley Means and Robert Kennedy, Jr. explained how bad health outcomes are for Americans. Specific examples were given regarding the control corporations have over our regulatory agencies.
As someone who’s written about the corruption, collusion and cover-up rampant at the FDA and CDC for over 20 years, the added scandal of the poisonous food Americans consume daily confirms that we have to dismantle the regulatory agencies. Their only job has been to promote the interests of the industries they’re supposed to oversee.
Fox: Former President Trump said he’ll work with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. to make American healthy again , if he’s elected, with a focus on improving the country’s metabolic health.
Clip from Joe Rogan interviewing Donald Trump
Rogan: I know you’re aware of Calley and Casey Means. One of the things that they pointed out, and this is a very important thing for people to understand is what a lot of these drugs do is they act to somehow or another to mitigate the effects of poor metabolic health. But most of these problems that people are suffering from wouldn’t exist if we put an emphasis on metabolic health.
Fox anchor: Here to discuss is TruMed co-founder, Calley Means.
Age of Autism reported on the shocking development of autism in the Minnesota Somali immigrant population 16 years ago. Award winning investigative author David Kirby wrote about the looming problem. When you try to read his report on HuffPo, that photo above is what you get.
Parents who had no word for the diagnosis in their language were rocked when their children changed. From this we know. PBS reports yet additional increases in the numbers. We tried to warn. We tried to help. A certain subset cut us off at the knees, instead seeing a money grab. A grab which has lead to fraud and thievery. And a generation of children harmed.
There was an absolutely shocking report from PBS News on the rate of autism among the Somali population in Minnesota. The numbers are staggering, but I can predict that NO OFFICIAL will do anything to address this.
This report should be of immediate concern to everyone at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Here are some of the highlights.
PBS News Hour co-anchor, Amna Nawaz:
In recent years, the prevalence of autism has risen significantly across all populations in the U.S.
Diagnoses are more common among children of color, but one group, Somali Americans, is seeing an alarming increase.
Fred De Sam Lazaro has this report from Minnesota, home to the largest Somali community in America.
Anisa Hagi-Mohamed, Parent Activist:
I have three children, two girls and a boy. And they have all been diagnosed autistic. Two of my children are verbal. One is partially verbal. And we speak, eat, sleep autism.
Fred De Sam Lazaro:
For Anisa Hagi-Mohamed and husband Duraan Ali (ph), this is one of few outings the family does together in a routine otherwise individually tailored for their 8-, 6-, and 3-year-old children..
On Sundays, the kids get to play in a safe space, set aside just for autistic children. Hagi-Mohamed was a teacher. She has a degree in linguistics, but has devoted her life to advocating for autistic children in the Somali American community.
Fred De Sam Lazaro:
. . .Autism is not widely understood in the Somali community, even though its become alarmingly prevalent.
Jennifer Hall-Lande, Minnesota Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network:
Overall rates in our 4-year-olds of one in 53. And what we were seeing in our Somali 4-year-olds were rates of one in 16.
Melissa Wervey Arnold is the Chief Executive Officer for the Ohio Chapter of the AAP, American Academy of Pediatrics. She recently posted on the open, public part of her Facebook page a photo of a gift basket she made for end of school year, not an AAP gift per se - "orange you glad..." was the theme. Clever, as we all remember the old knock knock joke from childhood. However, every bit of food and drink in the basket was completely contrary to the goal of children's or anyone's health. An Oompa Loompa would have run away screaming.
Sesame Street had a ditty to promote fruits and veggies that went, "I eat the colors of the rainbow." Unfortunately, American children eat the artificial colors of the rainbow from the moment they wake until they brush their teeth (or what's left of them) before bed. Robert Kennedy, Jr. has embarked on a campaign promoting health - and his recent focus was to educate Americans about the harm of chemical colors in our food. At AofA, we've been writing about the topic since our inception, including the scandalous use of Skittles by ABA therapists as an incentive for good behavior. Like giving a diabetic a cookie for taking his insulin. Jabberwocky. Bass ackwards.
A childhood attached to obesity, developmental delays (even if CDC moves the goal line) asthma inhalers, anti anxiety meds, epipens, glucose monitors & special education is NOT what childhood should be. We KNOW this. The problem affects every American, Communist to Ultra Conservative. The solutions are bi-tri-quad-quint-partisan.
In this short video, Robert Kennedy, Jr. explains how the unregulated food industry is poisoning our children. We have the sickest kids on the planet, and things have to change.
Enough Is Enough
Sep 25, 2024
The Democrats, who claim to be all about health care have stood by watching other countries ban these poisons that make our kids sick. Enough is enough. President Trump and I are going to stop the mass poisoning of American children.
VIDEO 5:44
Robert Kennedy, Jr.:
This is what most Americans innocently put into their bodies these days, and most alarmingly, into the bodies of their children.
And it’s no coincidence that Americans die earlier than Canadians or Germans or Italians or Japanese or Koreans or Australians or most any other comparable country.
And it wasn’t always that way. Until the early 1990s, our life expectancy was the same or better than other developed countries.
Can you imagine the deep pain of having to tell someone you are afraid of your beloved child? Please visit and subscribe (it's free) to Anne Dachel's Substack.
It was an interview from a radio station in Donegal. The parents of a family with four young adults with autism talked about the utter lack of support once autistic children leave school.
Sept 13, 2024, OceanFM: Mountcharles family with four autistic young adults say supports are completely inadequate
Patrick and Maria Brogan of Mountcharles in Donegal are the parents of four autistic young adults – Marty, Cassie, Daniel and Patrick. They’ve expressed their absolute frustration at the lack of supports and facilities in place for them, and say they’re considered merely as ‘add-ons’ in the eyes of the State
In the course of 12 minute interview was this shocking exchange between the father, Patrick Brogan, and the OceanFM host.
Epidemic increases
Patrick: It’s estimated that 23 percent of the child population, at the present moment, has a diagnosis of autism, ADD, ADHD, and the Belfast Trust has the prevalence and school age children with autism and Aspergers. And they estimate it to be one in 14.
One in 14 is two out of every big class and every national school in the county of Donegal.
There’s something badly wrong. Autism was not there, and the numbers—
Why so much autism?
OceanFM:Was it not there, or did we just not hear about it?
Patrick: Well, they changed the diagnosis 20 years ago, and the diagnoses have only gone up. So if they changed it to make it a broader range, well that should have compensated for the numbers, but the numbers have only gone up.
So there’s something wrong. I don’t know what’s causing it. It’s gone up at a steady rate. Let it be Wi-Fi signal, let it be food, let it be the water, phone signals, chemicals.
NO QUESTIONS ALLOWED!
I don’t know what’s causing it, but we as parents find it impossible to ask questions.
OceanFM:That’s one of your main frustrations, that you can’t ask questions.
What do you mean by that? Ask questions of whom? And what questions?
Patrick: Through the years, because of having the epilepsy with the children and all that, I’ve been in different hospitals at different times, and I often have conversations with different doctors, different consultants.
And four or five them told me, they can’t talk about it. If they do, they’re going to be struck off.
What’s that about? Why would they say something like that at the end of the day? . . .
So doctors in Ireland are NOT ALLOWED TO TALK ABOUT AUTISM OR THEY WILL LOSE THEIR JOBS.
Of course this is part of the massive cover-up and denial that has been swirling around autism for two decades, and it’s not just in Ireland. We’ve all been steadily brainwashed to believe that every stunning increase in the autism rate is thanks to better diagnosing by doctors and no real increase at all.
Note: Last week, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Nicole Shanahan tabled their run for the White House. We've known Robert for many years; he's no Johnny Come Lately on the decline of pediatric health. He IS a lightning rod, politically. Rather than focus on the immense hatred toward him, the worst of it coming from his own family, our focus is on his unwavering fight for our children. His mission is our mission. Like Dr. Andrew Wakefield, Robert does not have a child with autism. Both men have courage and heart, even at their own expense.
Our Anne Dachel is the queen of transcripts. Below is Robert's portion of his announcement that talks about his dedication to pediatric health in the USA. Feel free to let us know if you feel about Kennedy's throwing in with Republican candidate and former President Donald Trump. Or if you think Vice President Harris will craft a better future for children.
We're neutral in that we do not endorse. Kennedy is stalwart. Trump has a lot of baggage and many broken promises. Harris and Walz, himself Dad to a disabled son, may fund programs of value, but what of health choice issues? Discuss nicely. It's going to be a long road to November.
Bobby Kennedy spent the last thirty minutes of his announcement suspending his campaign on the chronic disease crisis in America. His words were genuine and moving. He told us he was putting children first. By suspending his campaign, he would be able to put this catastrophe into the forefront of political arena. News sources that totally ignored him previously, now have to at least acknowledge his presence.
1:21:25
Three great causes drove me to enter this race in the first place. Primarily, and these are the three causes that persuaded me to leave the Democratic Party and run as an independent and now to throw my support to President Trump.
The causes were free speech, the war in Ukraine and the war on our children. . . .
Less than two hours after President Trump narrowly escaped assassination, Calley Means called me on my cell phone, I was in Las Vegas. Calley is arguably the leading advocate for food safety, for soil regeneration and for ending the chronic disease epidemic that is destroying America’s health and ruining our economy.
Calley has exposed the insidious corruption at the FDA and the NIH, the HHS and the USDA that has caused the epidemic.
Calley had been working on and off for my campaign, advising me on those subjects since the beginning. And those subjects have been my primary focus for the last 20 years.
I was delighted when Calley told me that day that he had also been advising President Trump.
He told me President Trump was anxious to talk to me about chronic disease and other subjects, and to explore avenues of cooperation.
He asked if I would take a call from the President. President Trump telephoned me a few minutes later, and I met with him the following day. A few weeks later, I met again with President Trump and his family members and close advisors in Florida.
In a series of long, intense discussions, I was surprised to discover that we are aligned on many key issues. In those meetings, he suggested that we join forces as a Unity Party. We talked about Abraham Lincoln’s team of rivals.
That arrangement would allow us to disagree publicly and privately and furiously, if need be on issues over which we differ, while working together on the existential issues upon which we are in concordance. . . .
We are aligned with each other on other key issues . . .ending the childhood disease epidemic. . . unraveling the corporate capture of our regulatory agencies . . .
. . . Vice President Harris decline to meet or even to speak with me.
Suspending my candidacy is a heart-rending for me, but I’m convinced that it’s the best hope for ending the Ukraine War and ending the chronic disease epidemic that is eroding our nations vitality from the inside, and for finally protecting free speech.
I feel a moral obligation to use this opportunity to save millions of American children, above all things.
In case some of you don’t realize how dire the condition is of our children’s health and chronic disease in general, I would urge you to view Tucker Carlson’sinterview with Calley Means and his sister, Dr. Casey Means, who is a top graduate of her class at Stanford Medical School
This is an issue that affects all of us far more directly and urgently than any culture war issue and all the other issues that we obsess on and that are tearing apart our country.
This is the most important issue, therefore it has the potential to bring us together. So let me share a little bit about why I feel it is so urgent.
Today two-thirds—we pay, we spend more health care than any country on earth, twice what they pay in Europe, and yet we have the worst health outcomes of any nation in the world.
We’re about seventy-ninth in health outcomes, behind Costa Rica and Nicaragua and Mongolia and other countries.
Nobody has a chronic disease burden like we have, and during the COVID epidemic, we had the highest body count of any country in the world.
We had 16 percent of the COVID deaths, and we only have 4.2 percent of the world’s population.
And CDC says that’s because we are the sickest people on earth. We have the highest chronic disease rate on earth and for the average American who died from COVID had 3.8 chronic diseases.
So these were people who had immune system collapse, who had mitochondrial dysfunction, and no other country has anything like this.
Two-thirds of American adults and children suffer from chronic health issues.
50 years ago, that number was less than one percent. So we’ve gone from one percent to 66 percent.
In America, 74 percent of Americans now are overweight or obese, and 50 percent of our children.
120 years ago, when somebody was obese, they were sent to the circus. There were case reports done about them. Obesity was almost unknown.
In Japan, childhood obesity rate is three percent, compared to 50 percent here.
Half of Americans have pre-diabetes or Type II diabetes. When my uncles was President and I was a boy, juvenile diabetes was effectively nonexistent.
A typical pediatrician would see one case of diabetes during his entire career, 40 or 50 year career.
Today one out of ever three kids who walks through his office door is diabetic or pre diabetic.
And the mitochondrial disorder that causes diabetes is also causing Alzheimer’s, which is now classified as diabetes, and it’s costing this country more than our military budget every year.
There’s been an explosion of neurological illness that I never saw as kid, ADD, ADHD, speech delay, language delay, Tourette’s syndrome, narcolepsy, ASD, Aspegers, autism.
In the year 2000, rate was one in 1,500. Now autism rates in kids are one in 36, according to CDC nationally.
Nobody’s talking about this.
One in every 22 kids in California has autism. and this is a crisis: that 77% of our kids cannot or are too disabled to serve in the United States military. What is happening to our country, and why isn't this in the headlines every single day?
There's nobody else in the world that is experiencing this. This is only happening in America. About 18%, and by the way, you know, there has been no change in diagnosis, which the industry sometimes likes to say, there has been no change in screening. This is a change in incidence.
In my generation of 70-year-old men, the odds and rates [of autism] are about one in 10,000. In my kids’ generation, one in 34.
I'll repeat: in California, 1 in 22. Why are we letting this happen? Why are we allowing this to happen to our children? These are the most precious assets that we have in this country. How can we let this happen to them?
About 18% of American teens now have fatty liver disease. That's like one out of every five. That disease, when I was a kid, only affected late-stage alcoholics who were elderly. Cancer rates are skyrocketing in the young and the old. Young adult cancers are up 79%.
One in four American women is on antidepressant medication, 40% of teen teens have a mental health diagnosis, and 15% of high schoolers are on Adderall, and half a million children on SSRIs.
So what's causing this suffering? I'll name two culprits. First and the worst is ultra-processed food. About 70% of American children's diet is ultra-processed. That means industrial manufactured in factories. These foods consist primarily of processed sugar, ultra-processed grains, and seed oils.
Laboratory scientists who have formed many of them formerly worked for the cigarette industry, which purchased all the big food companies in the 1970s and ‘80s, deployed thousands of scientists to figure out chemicals, new chemicals, to make the food more addictive. And these ingredients didn't exist 100 years ago.
Humans aren't biologically adapted to eat them. A hundred of these chemicals are now banned in Europe but are ubiquitous in American processed foods. The second culprit is toxic chemicals in our food, our medicine, and our environment. Pesticides, food additives, pharmaceutical drugs, and toxic waste permeate every cell of our bodies.
This assault on our children's cells and hormones is unrelenting. And to name just one problem, many of these chemicals increase estrogen. Because young children are ingesting so many of these hormone disruptors, America's puberty rate is now occurring at age 10 to 13, which is six years earlier than girls were reaching puberty in 1900.
Our country has the earliest puberty rates of any continent on the earth, and no, this isn't because of better nutrition. This is not normal. Breast cancer is also estrogen-driven, and it now strikes one in eight women. We are mass-poisoning all of our children and our adults.
Considering the grievous human cause of this tragic epidemic of chronic disease, it seems almost crass to mention the damage it does to our economy. But I'll say it is crippling the nation's finances. When my uncle was president, our country spent zero dollars on chronic disease. Today, government healthcare spending is almost all for chronic disease, and it's double the military budget, and it is the fastest-growing budget item in the federal budget.
Chronic disease costs more to the economy as a whole, costs at least $4 trillion—five times our military budget. And that's a 20% drag on everything we do and everything we aspire to.
Poor and minority communities suffer disproportionately. People who worry about DEI or about, you know, bigotry of any kind, this dwarfs anything. We are poisoning the poor. We are systematically poisoning minorities across this country. Industry lobbyists have made sure that most of the food stamp lunch program, about 70% of food stamps, and about 70% or 77% of school lunches are processed foods.
There's no vegetables. There's nothing that you would wanna eat. We are just poisoning the poor citizens, and that's why they have the highest chronic disease burden of anybody, any demographic in our country, and the highest in the world. The same food industry lobbied to make sure that nearly all agricultural subsidies are owed to commodity crops that are the feedstock of the processed food industry.
These policies are destroying small farms, and they're destroying our soils. We give, we give about, I think, eight times as much in subsidies to tobacco than we do to fruits and vegetables. It makes no sense. If we want a healthy country, the good news is that we can change all this.
We can change it very, very quickly. America can get healthy again. To do that, we need to do three things. First, we need to root out the corruption in our health agencies. Second, we need to change incentives in our healthcare system. And third, we need to inspire Americans to get healthy again.
Eighty percent of NIH grants go to people who have conflicts of interest. These are the people virtually everybody who sits — you know who Joe Biden just appointed a new panel to NIH to decide food recommendations.
And they're all people who are from the industry. They're all people who are from the processed food companies. They're deciding what Americans, you know, hear is healthy. And the recommendations on the food pyramid, and what goes to our school lunch programs, which would go to the, you know, the program, the SNAP program, the food stamp programs, they're all corrupted and conflicted individuals.
These agencies, the FDA, USDA, and CDC — all of them are controlled by giant for-profit corporations. Seventy-five percent of the FDA's funding doesn't come from taxpayers. It comes from pharma. And pharma executives and consultants and lobbyists cycle in and out of these agencies. With President Trump's backing, I'm gonna change that.
We're gonna staff these agencies with honest scientists and doctors who are free from industry funding. We're gonna make sure the decisions of consumers, doctors, and patients are informed by unbiased science. A sick child is the best thing for the pharmaceutical industry. When American children or adults get sick with a chronic condition, they’re put on medication for their entire life.
Imagine what will happen when Medicare starts paying for Ozempic, which costs $1,500 a month—and it's being recommended for children as young as 6—all for a condition, obesity, that is completely preventable and barely even existed 100 years ago. And 74% of Americans are obese.
The cost if all of them took their Ozempic prescription is $3 trillion a year. This is a drug that is made by Novo Nordisk, the biggest company in Europe. It’s a Danish company, and the Danish government does not recommend it. It recommends change in diet to treat obesity and exercise. And in our country, the recommendation now is for Ozempic to children at age 6.
Novo Nordisk is the biggest company in Europe, and virtually its entire value is based upon its projections of what it's gonna sell, of the Ozempic it's gonna sell to America. And we have — the food lobbyists have a bill in front of Congress today that is backed by the White House, backed by Vice President Harris and President Biden, to to allow this to happen.
This $3 trillion cost is gonna bankrupt our country. For a fraction of that amount, we could buy organic food for every American family, three meals a day, and eliminate diabetes altogether. We're gonna bring healthy food back to school lunches. We're gonna stop subsidizing the worst foods with our agricultural subsidies.
We're gonna get toxic chemicals out of our food. We're gonna reform the entire food system. And for that, we need new leadership in Washington because, unfortunately, both the Democrats and the Republican parties are in cahoots with the Big Food producers, Big Pharma and Big Ag, which are among the DNC's major donors. Vice President Harris has expressed no interest in addressing this issue. Four more years of Democratic rule will complete the consolidation of corporate and the neocon power, and our children will be the ones who suffer most.
I got involved with chronic disease 20 years ago, not because I chose to or wanted to. It was essentially thrust upon me. It was an issue that should have been central to the environmental movement. I was a central leader at that time, but it was widely ignored by all the institutions, including the NGOs, who should have been protecting our kids against toxins. It was an orphaned issue, and I had a weakness for orphans.
I watched generations of children get sicker and sicker. I had 11 siblings, and I have seven kids myself. I was conscious of what was happening in their classrooms and to their friends, and I watched these sick kids, these damaged kids — in that generation, almost all of them are damaged. And nobody in power seemed to care or to even notice.
For 19 years, I prayed every morning that God would put me in a position to end this calamity. The chronic disease crisis was one of the primary reasons for my running for president, along with ending the censorship and the Ukraine war. It's the reason I've made the heart-wrenching decision to suspend my campaign and to support President Trump.
This decision is agonizing for me because of the difficulties it causes my wife and my children and my friends. But I have the certainty that this is what I'm meant to do, and that certainty gives me internal peace even in storms. If I'm given the chance to fix the chronic disease crisis and reform our food production, I promise that within two years, we will watch the chronic disease burden lift dramatically.
We will make Americans healthy again. Within four years, America will be a healthy country. We will be stronger, more resilient, more optimistic, and happier. I won't fail in doing this. Ultimately, the future, however it happens, is in God's hands and in the hands of the American voters and those of President Trump. If President Trump is elected and honors his word, the vast burden of chronic disease that now demoralizes and bankrupts the country will disappear. This is a spiritual journey for me.
I reached my decision through deep prayer, through a hard-nosed logic, and I asked myself, “What choices must I make to maximize my chances to save America's children and restore national health?” I felt that if I refused this opportunity, I would not be able to look myself in the mirror, knowing that I could have saved lives of countless children and reversed this country's chronic disease epidemic.
I'm 70 years old. I may have a decade to be effective. I can't imagine that a President Harris would allow me or anyone to solve these dire problems. After eight years of President Harris, any opportunity for me to fix the problem will be out of my reach forever.
President Trump has told me that he wants this to be his legacy. I'm choosing to believe that this time he will follow through. His son, his biggest donors, his closest friends all support this objective. My joining the Trump campaign will be a difficult sacrifice for my wife and children but worthwhile if there's even a small chance of saving these kids.
Ultimately, the only thing that will save our country and our children is if we choose to love our kids more than we hate each other. That's why I launched my campaign to unify America.
My dad and uncle made such an enduring mark on the character of our nation, not so much because of any particular policies that they promoted, but because they were able to inspire profound love for our country and to fortify our sense of ourselves as a national community held together by ideals.
They were able to put their love into the intentions and hearts of ordinary Americans and to unify a national populist movement of Americans, blacks and whites, Hispanics, urban and rural Americans. They inspired affection and love and high hopes and a culture of kindness that continue to radiate among Americans in their memory.
That's the spirit on which I ran my campaign and that I intend to bring into the campaign of President Trump. Instead of vitriol and polarization, I will appeal to the values that unite us, the goals that we could achieve if only we weren't at each other's throats. The most unifying theme for all Americans is that we all love our children.
If we all unite around that issue now, we can finally give them the protection, the health, and the future that they deserve. Thank you all very much.
###
Get to know The Real Anthony Fauci in this #1 best seller from Skyhorse Publishing.
Anthony Fauci seems to have not considered that his unprecedented quarantine of the healthy would kill far more people than COVID, obliterate the global economy, plunge millions into poverty and bankruptcy, and grievously wound constitutional democracy globally.
Note: Unimaginable yesterday, unmanageable today and unsustainable tomorrow.
By Anne Dachel
England/Wales: Number of children receiving disability support "more than doubles" in decade
AUTISM and ADHD are behind the surge
There is a national crisis unfolding in the U.K., and people seem surprised that it’s happening.
I’m referring to the disastrous statistics just published showing that over the last decade the number of children in England and Wales receiving disability benefits more than doubled. The reason behind the increase is AUTISM and ADHD.
Guardian: Warning over rise in children on disability benefits in England and Wales
In a new report, the Resolution Foundation thinktank points out that the number of children whose families receive disability living allowance (DLA) has more than doubled in the last decade, to 682,000.
The biggest shift has come among teenagers, with 8% of all 15-year-olds receiving DLA last year, up from 5% in 2013. . . .
The thinktank says the increase in DLA payments has been “almost entirely driven by awards made to children whose main condition is either a learning difficulty, behavioural disorder or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)”.
Understanding and diagnoses of such conditions have increased rapidly in recent decades. A study by UCL researchers found a 20-fold increase in diagnoses of ADHD between 2000 and 2018. Another paper found that autism diagnoses had shot up by 787% over the 20 years from 1998. . . .
DLA, which includes a “mobility” and a “care” component, is worth between £28.70 [$37] and £184.30 [$240] a week, depending on how much additional help the child is deemed to need.
With claims rising sharply, the total cost of paying the benefit has increased from £1.9bn [$2.5B] to £4bn[$5B] in real terms over the past 10 years.
The spending watchdog the Office for Budget Responsibility has forecast that the cost of all disability benefits will increase by almost half over the next five years, to £58bn [$75B].
Independent: Surge in young people claiming disability benefits, research suggests
A study from the Resolution Foundation found 1.2 million children across England and Wales are living with a disability. . . .
The think tank said four in five children receiving the Child DLA had been diagnosed with a learning difficulty, behavioural disorder, or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
There are even calls for the government to find out why there’s been this dramatic increase.
Ms Murphy said the Government needed to focus on tackling the underlying prevalence of disability.
“It is understandable that politicians want to reduce the rise in disability benefit spending,” she said.
“But to do that they will need to understand and address the root causes of rising disability among children.”
Still, the claim of greater awareness is out there.
A Government spokesperson said: “We are committed to ensuring parents with children with disabilities are supported fairly.
“Awareness of neurodevelopmental conditions has increased over the past decade with a rise in the numbers of children seeking formal diagnoses reflected in those seeking support.”
. . .Ms Murphy added: "For example, the number of children being prescribed medication for ADHD and for conditions like anxiety and depression has increased quite significantly.
"And we've seen some quite troubling trends. For example, an increase in the number of children being admitted to hospital in relation to self-harm.
Since news outlets long ago stopped caring about the nonstop increases in disabled children globally, I wouldn’t expect them to understand what’s really happening here.
IF they were paying attention, members of the press in the U.K. would have noticed the nonstop increases in special needs students everywhere in the country over the last two decades.
On my site, LossOfBrainTrust, https://www.lossofbraintrust.com/ most of the news reports are from the U.K., and I can’t even begin to give examples of the disaster that is special education in that country, there are so many. There are literally thousands.
I cite routine stories announcing yet another new autism/special school. There are the reports on “increased demand” and “more complex needs” out every day in the news. Kids are on waiting lists for years just for assessments, followed by waiting lists for services. Local councils are facing bankruptcy over the cost of special education.
Without fail there is never anyone asking where all these disabled children are coming from. The only solutions talked about are more funding and more special needs places.
Autism is never a problem
Just like in the U.S., members of the press in the U.K. call for celebrating autism awareness and acceptance every April. They credit the increases in autism to greater awareness of a disorder that’s always been around. They promote neurodiversity and inclusion and are never alarmed over the rate increases.
Across the U.K. something is terribly wrong with the developmental health of children.
Eight months ago the Glasgow Herald announced that 37 percent of Scottish students have special needs.
This scenario might sound far-fetched, but it is in fact just average. Figures published by the Scottish Government this week reveal that the number of children with additional support needs (ASN) has reached a record high of 259,036, or 36.7 per cent of pupils.
Last month the press inWalesreported that 48 percent of children had “some form of additional learning needs.”
Where was the national alarm over these numbers?
And the cause of the explosion in special needs students is AUTISM.
In 2022, Schools Week in the U.K. published, SEND isn’t on the precipice – it’s tipped over the edge
Over half of the children and young people in special schools have a primary or secondary need of autism. For children in early years specialist settings, the figure is 65 per cent….
As far as autism is concerned, statistics are truly catastrophic in the U.K.
In May, 2023, the BBC reported thatNorthern Irelandhad the highest rate of autism in the world.
Take a listen in the first video - the doctor catches herself saying, "ABNORMAL" development and quickly changes her language to "DIFFERENT." That's the story, morning glory. Autism MUST be called a difference. and doctors have been told as much. Oh, and man-made toxic load during pregnancy might cause autism.
By Anne Dachel
AUSTRALIA: Is BPA exposure in utero linked to autism? “World-first study” finds a risk
At last, there is something substantive to say about why there is so much autism in kids today. As the rate of autism continues to climb, it’s getting harder and harder to sell the tired claim that we’ve always had autism around like this, but doctors didn’t know what it was until recently.
Research has, over the past two decades, linked the development of autism to bad moms. I’ve long talked about the dead-end studies showing an “association” between the behavior of mothers and autism in children: moms who are old, fat, drinking, smoking, having babies too close together, having preemies, living too close to freeways, taking antidepressants, etc.
It was a bit of a stretch to say that any of those findings could explain the world-wide explosion in the rate of autism to now three to five percent of children and growing.
At last, research shows a link between male fetuses exposed to BPA (bisphenol A) and autism in mice.
Australian scientists have produced research from over the past ten years pointing to plastics as the culprit in boys developing autism. There is still a lot of work that needs to be done here, but the good news is, not only do they suspect plastics are a factor, but they’ve also found a way to reverse the symptoms of autism in mice.
Several American scientists were involved in this study, but the main effort was in Melbourne, Australia.
This is very important in Australia because, as we learned in April this year, one in 25 “seven to 14-year-olds now have a primary diagnosis of autism.” Guardian
Researchers are careful to avoid saying there is a causal link, but there are reports everywhere talking about the scientists and what this means going forward.
It would naturally follow that we need to clean up the plastics industry and have pregnant women be careful about their exposure to BPA.
Here’s what the press is telling us.
News.com.au: BPA plastic in womb linked to autism, world-first study finds
A world-first study by Aussie scientists has discovered a link between a common chemical, and autism symptoms.
Pregnant mothers who gave birth to boys with autism were found to have had higher levels of a plastic chemical commonly used in food packaging in their wombs, according to Aussie scientists in a world-first study.
A long-term peer-reviewed study by the Florey Institute in Melbourne found boys with lower levels of a key brain enzyme aromatase and who were born to mothers with high levels of the plastic chemical bisphenol A (BPA) in their wombs are three-and-a-half times more likely to have autism symptoms by the age of two.
By the age of 11, they are six times more likely to have had a verified autism diagnosis.
BPA can be found in takeaway containers, plastic bottles, the lining of takeaway coffee cups as well as polycarbonate (hard) plastics such as baby bottles.
It’s also used in the lining of cans to stop the food coming into contact with the metal, and is even found on the shiny coating of cash register receipts.
“Exposure to plastic chemicals during pregnancy has already been shown in some studies to be associated with subsequent autism in offspring,” Florey scientist and co-author Professor Anne-Louise Ponsonby said in a statement.
“BPA can disrupt hormone controlled male fetal brain development in several ways, including silencing a key enzyme, aromatase, that controls neurohormones and is especially important in fetal male brain development. This appears to be part of the autism puzzle.”
Speaking to The Australian, Professor Ponsonby stressed the chemical is “not the cause of autism”.
Dr. Anne-Louise Ponsonby is getting the most coverage about the study.
ABC News: Study links prenatal BPA exposure and autism risk in boys
Dr. Ponsonby:
Several past studies have shown a link between higher plastic exposure in pregnancy and abnormal child neurodevelopment including or different child neurodevelopment including autism.
We wanted to go beyond correlation to understand this more deeply. So we conducted an program of research over 10 years including two birth cohorts, one here in Australia . . . and one in New York Columbus Centers study, and then over 25 laboratory studies to consistently get a picture on what was happening with the link between these two in terms of underlying mechanisms. We have now published that.
So we find that this link between higher BPA exposure in the womb and the risk of male autism is through suppression of aromatase, a key steroid enzyme in brain development, particularly for males. . . .
PBA is not the only chemical to worry about and much more study is needed.
So now we’re concerned about chemical mixtures. Sorry for the difficult news, but we can only move forward.
We’re worried about chemical mixtures acting together. BPA is just the oldest and the easiest one to start with and study, but we’re not saying that’s the only one that needs consideration here.
It’s up to the regulators.
It’s not our job to consider. It’s safety regulators of governments, and already the findings of this paper have gone towards EU regulation systems. So it’s good to know that the findings are feeding back into that loop. . . .
The anchor asked if these findings would result in advice to parents.
Ponsonby:
I think that the regulatory bodies that are responsible for giving advice about exposures during pregnancy or process levels in food, they themselves will consider and bring it into their recommendations.
More generally, things don’t usually change just on one study, but certainly this study will contribute to that machinery of advice and recommendations.
With the treatment, we’re yet to evaluate it in humans. We haven’t even established the safety in humans, yet alone the efficacy. That’ll be work that Florey [Institute] is continuing to do hopefully eventually developing human trials, but now that …Boon have identified this compound it really starts to give us some better ideas towards future autism treatment for subgroups of children with autism that it might be warranted for and also for prevention.
In both the cohort studies, higher levels of BPA were associated with switching down that aromatase gene that’s very important for controlling male brain development in particular, less so for females. . . .
Then in the lab studies we had a whole lot of other mechanistic data: cell cultures, electrical activity. The important is my colleagure, associate professor Boon found a target compound that once we had identified the mechanism could then negate some of these effective BPA, and in fact, minimize some of the features of autism. across different types of models in the lab.
Anchor:
Wow! That is a huge development in itself, two big developments.
People who may be pregnant may be worried watching this . . . So what is it that’s in a mother’s stomach that is causing the damage?
Ponsonby:
Unfortunately we find plastic avoidance at the individual level is quite difficult to achieve. Many studies have shown that, so it’s really a job for government regulators.
Currently BPA is in some food contact plastic materials. It’s in lining of cans, and it’s in epoxy lining on various different products
Even though BPA has become less common, other bisphenols like BPF and S. They’re very similar in structure, and I think we have to consider that they may have some health issues as well and should be evaluated for that.
And the other thing in our work is this aromatase site is the site that we know that other chemicals like flame retardants can operate.
So now we’re concerned about chemical mixtures. Sorry for the difficult news, but we can only move forward. . . .
The Australian: Doctors are calling for tougher regulation of the chemical BPA amid health harms
Medical experts have called for an overhaul of plastics regulation in Australia as growing evidence indicates that neuroendocrine-disrupting chemicals are linked with the development of autism.
The nation’s top doctors’ group has called for an overhaul of plastics regulation in Australia as growing evidence indicates that neuroendocrine-disrupting chemicals found in disposable water bottles, food containers, canned food packaging and cosmetics are linked with the development of autism.
News9 Australia: Plastic chemicals may trigger autism in boys, says research
Anchor:
There’s been a big breakthrough in understanding what may cause autism with new research linking autism in boys with plastic chemicals. Two Melbourne based scientists found that pregnant women with traces of food packaging in their system are more likely to give birth to boys who then develop the condition.
Anne-Louise Ponsonby:
The unique feature of our work was not so much the link between high plastic exposure and autism, several past studies have shown that, but we went beyond correlation to be actually be able to map out an underlying mechanism, and that involved the suppression of a key steroid enzyme called aromatase that is particularly important for male brain in utero.
And let me add that this mechanism is not possibly occurring for all autism. Autism is a complex multifactorial disease with both genetic and environmental drivers. . . . We think this is a contributing factor to some cases of autism.
It’s very helpful to understand something about a mechanism because it puts us in a much better position for future prevention and treatment. . . .
Anchor: Could this lead to preventive treatment? ,,,
Ponsonby:
We are hoping to move towards treatment. One of my colleagues. . . she tested and identified a target compound that could negate some of the effects of plastic and actually reduce some of the autism symptoms. . . . We’re yet to move to any human phase with safety or efficacy. . . .
Professor Boon and team have been talking with the U.S. FDA and are trying to move towards safety human trials in the first instance.
Medical News: Higher BPA levels in pregnant mothers linked to autism in sons
Professor Ponsonby said the researchers analysed two large birth cohorts – the Barwon Infant Study (BIS) in Australia and the Columbia Centre for Children's Health and Environment in the USA. . . .
BPA can disrupt hormone controlled male fetal brain development in several ways, including silencing a key enzyme, aromatase, that controls neurohormones and is especially important in fetal male brain development. This appears to be part of the autism puzzle." . . .
In laboratory work, Dr Boon studied the impact of prenatal BPA on mice. . . .
Professor Ponsonby said BPA, similar bisphenols and other plastic chemicals with endocrine-disrupting effects are now widespread and almost impossible for individuals to avoid.
"We all ingest plastic chemicals in many ways – through ingesting plastic food and drink packaging, inhaling home renovation fumes, and through the skin from sources such as cosmetics. There are so many ways these chemicals enter our bodies, so, it's not surprising that BPA was present in a large proportion of the women's urine samples we studied. It's important for us to understand how these plastics affect our health," Professor Ponsonby said.
7News Australia: Microplastics warning for expectant mums - Products to avoid
7News:
Researchers here at the Florey tested BPA levels in the urine of pregnant women. Male babies with a lower level of brain hormones were six times more likely to be diagnosed with autism if their mothers had high levels of BPA. It’s commonly found in food packaging like plastic bottles and tin cans.
To limit exposure avoid drinking out of soft waster bottles, don’t put plastic in the microwave, also don’t touch till receipts
Professor Mark Green, Melbourne University:
Here in Australia, till receipts are absolutely covered in BPA, so just doing those simple things will hopefully reduce your exposure to BPA.
7News:
The same scientists also found a drug that can reduce BPA-induced autism in mice.
Dr. Wah Chin Boon:
That symptoms were actually reversed, and their brain activity returns to normal.
7News: Scientists are now planning to test whether this drug can reverse autism in humans. The safety studies could begin as early as next year.
Ponsonby: First we have to establish safety and then work towards efficacy.
The Project: Are Plastic Chemical Causing Autism?
A plastic chemical found everywhere in our daily lives, and now a group of Aussie scientists have linked it to the development of autism in boys.
So, can this world-first discovery revolutionize our understanding of the condition?
It leaches into our food, we absorb it through our skin, inhale it when we breathe. It’s in plastic bottles and takeout containers, the linings of coffee cups and canned food, the shiny coatings of cash receipts, a chemical that is used to harden plastics.
About 95 percent of us have bisphenol A, also known as BPA, in our bodies right now.
Dr. Wah Chin Boon:
The problem now is that it’s everywhere. So even if it passes through your body in 45 minutes, you’re constantly being exposed to it.
Reporter:
Now in a ground-breaking study, a group of Aussie scientists have discovered a link between high levels of BPA in pregnant moms and the development of autism in boys.
Ponsonby:
It seems to be particularly in mid-gestation, rather than very early or very late I pregnancy.
Reporter:
Studying 1,770 pairs of mothers and children over more than a decade, scientists found that BPA can switch off an enzyme called aromatase, which is key to brain development, particularly in boys.
Ponsonby:
If the child had a genetic architecture indicating that they were vulnerable—
Reporter:
—then those boys, when exposed to high levels of BPA in the womb, were three and a half times more likely to have autism symptoms by the age of two.
Six times more likely to have an autism diagnosis by age 11.
And there’s a potential antidote, a fatty acid that reversed the effects of BPA in lab mice.
Boon:
They can actually start to socialize and stop their excessive grooming, and even their brain activity returns to normal.
This is huge news. Plastic exposure is worldwide so it makes sense that the damage would be seen everywhere.
IF these findings gain support, it would be a way for doctors and health officials to finally admit autism is increasing, something no one in our regulatory agencies has ever done in the past.
Of course it will be years before we have anything conclusive about the link between BPA and autism, but I can see a massive effort for companies to get on board with the move for SAFE PLASTIC. We’ll see the end to plastic coated cash register receipts, and we could go back to glass bottles for soft drinks. The possibilities are endless.Top of Form
Cathy Jameson is a Contributing Editor for Age of Autism.
###
Get to know The Real Anthony Fauci in this #1 best seller from Skyhorse Publishing.
Anthony Fauci seems to have not considered that his unprecedented quarantine of the healthy would kill far more people than COVID, obliterate the global economy, plunge millions into poverty and bankruptcy, and grievously wound constitutional democracy globally.
For years, and I mean actually a couple of decades now, I have written about THE REALLY BIG LIE ABOUT AUTISM. It’s the LIE that can never die. This is the indisputable claim espoused by everyone in authority that THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A REAL INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN WITH AUTISM IN AMERICA.
Each time there was an announcement of a new rate, some official, often in a public health service uniform, solemnly assured us that THIS INCREASE DID NOT MEAN MORE CHILDREN ACTUALLY HAVE AUTISM.
In the real world, however, we watched the numbers explode.
In 2002 the rate was one in every 250 children.
In 2004 it was one in 166 children, one in 102 boys.
In 2007 it was one in 150 children, one in 92 boys.
In 2009 it was one in 110 children, one in 68 boys.
In 2012 it was one in 88 children, one in 54 boys.
In 2014 it was one in 68 children, one in 42 boys.
In 2018 it was one in 59 children, one in 36 boys.
In 2020 it was one in 54 children, one in 33 boys.
In 2021 it was one in 44 children, one in 27 boys.
In 2023 it became one in 36 children, one in 22 boys.
In California, it is in 22 children, one in 14 boys
In Florida, it is almost one in 20 children, one in 12 boys.
Reports from other places are equally stunning.
In British Columbia, it is one in 29 children, one in 18 boys.
In Australia, it is one in 25 children, one in 17 boys.
Typically experts are cited telling us that autism is genetic. IF any “environmental trigger” is noted, it is usually some updated version of blaming the “refrigerator mom” of the 1950s and 1960s.
Over the years, studies have linked autism to:
Fat moms, drinking moms, smoking moms, old moms, moms who marry old dads, moms who have preemies, moms who have babies too close together, moms who live too close to freeways, moms who carry Neanderthal DNA, and the latest “blame the mom” is out of Japan, prenatal blood exposures.
Gaslighting us
So this is what we have to believe: Autism as a condition has always been around; it just wasn’t recognized until the 21st century.
Each and every increase is a good thing because we’re getting smarter and smarter at noticing it.
Of course doctors, nurses, teachers, police, librarians and everyone dealing with the public have to be educated about autism, even though it’s always been a part of the human condition.
It is now a given that all the autism is nothing new; we’re finally doing something about it. So if your child starts out normally developing, then loses learned skills, such as talking and using a potty, like 30 percent of autistic children, that’s always been happening.
Schools are starting to address autism, even though IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) has been around for 50 years requiring special needs education for all disabled students.
The autism rate comes from studies of eight year olds, but we have to believe that the same rate affects 40, 60 and 80 year olds.
Parents are desperate because of the lack of services once their children age out of school, but they will no doubt go where autistic adults have always gone after graduation.
A third of autistic children are classified as non-verbal, and so there must be the same percentage of autistic adults who can’t verbally communicate.
Come April, 2025, when U.S. health officials can be expected to announce yet another gigantic increase in autism, we can relax knowing that it’ll all be attributed to even more better diagnosing/greater awareness.
All this is what we’ve been led to believe for the past 20 plus years, and most Americans firmly accept it all, especially parents of autistic children.
It is very hard to contradict this orthodoxy of autism when doctors tell it to us, and the media uses every opportunity to convince us that autism is a fact of life we just have to learn to live with.
That’s the whole purpose of APRIL, AUTISM ACCEPTANCE MONTH. It used to be Autism Awareness Month, but that was back when people saw this as something new in childhood. Now we don’t really remember a world without autism.
Today we celebrate neurodiversity each April with blue lights. The puzzle piece image will fade because autism is no longer a puzzle. We now accept autism as a fact of life. What we need is inclusion and services.
The main job of the media in all this gaslighting is to convince us that nothing is wrong with more and more autism. They show us the doctors and health officials who know all about autism and are not worried about ever-increasing numbers.
Businesses are becoming “sensory-friendly” and whole cities are now “Certified Autism Centers.”
In the U.K. they can’t keep up with the need for autism classrooms and autism schools, but local officials are always “excited” about each new ribbon cutting ceremony for all the new facilities.
And for those who are worried about those continual increases, Forbes recently dismissed any concerns that the increases will continue.
The author, Nancy Dole, is a psychologist “specializing in neurodiversity.”
We’re all familiar with the idea that rates of neurodivergence are rising, and that the speed is taking clinical and educational services to the brink. The Center for Disease Control in the USA report that the rates have increased from 1 in 125 in the year 2004 to 1 in 36 in 2020. That is a vast increase and the reasons are generally ascribed to improved diagnosis protocols, improved training for educators and clinicians, as well as public awareness. Similarly, the number of children with an ADHD diagnosis in the USA increased by 1 million between 2016 and 2022
No need to worry
Some have suggested that the rates of ADHD / Autism itself is increasing, and search for medical reasons why this might be the case. One blogger recently stated “But if we look ahead to 2050, it’s estimated that about half of all kids will have an ASD diagnosis.” Now, the author themselves confesses that their article is unsubstantiated, but if the statistic is already starting to do the rounds, it has the potential to harm. Let's unpack where it came from, and learn a lesson about how easy it is to fall into alarmist, misleading claims.
. . . However, the subtext here is that Autism rises are something to be worried about, that they insinuate ill health and that such rises represent a potential crisis or major change to human functioning.
Neurodiversity is not a bad thing
Within the neurodiversity paradigm, we challenge that neurodivergence is a medical symptom of illness. We assert the right to be cognitively diverse and to have our unusual neurotypes respected as part of the varied tapestry of human thinking. We have argued that we are not broken and do not need fixing. These arguments land badly in our community even before we have considered the knock on effects of catastrophizing and inflaming the stigma that “everyone is Autistic now” or that “we all need to be afraid of rising neurodivergence”.
(All this sounds nice, but it’s hardly the view of parents still changing the diapers on their young adult non-verbal, self-injuring autistic children.)
Don’t worry about the cause.
The source article asserts that Autism is caused by inflammation from poor diet, hence the exponential rise and the potential of this rise to be limitless as food chains become ever industrialized. The litany of pseudo-medical claims as to the ‘cause’ of Autism / ADHD / Tourettes, based on correlation rather than causality, has a long tail of harm to our community. At best, it leads to parent blaming and pressure to enforce restrictive diets on people who are known to struggle with food and nutrition. At worst it starts a vaccination crisis which has led to outbreaks of diseases, significant harm and increased mortality.
It’s all in the genes
Neurodivergent people are a long term feature of the human gene pool. The extent to which we experiencing inflammation, mental distress, sleep disorders and marginalization is potentially a much more recent effect. As scientists, the more we learn, the more we are likely to say "it depends", and to appreciate complexity. There is unlikely to be one answer to neurodivergence, or one answer to inflammation. These are multi-factorial, complex adaptive neurotypes and systemic responses.
Doyle tells us not to worry about more increases because it’s not going to happen.
Our focus in employment should be on what we can do to help, rather than pontificating about genetics and being judgmental about lifestyles. Healthy work environments and promotion of work life balance to nurture good sleep and self-care is a good idea for all employees. All those who are most vulnerable will benefit more, including but not limited to neurodivergent people. That's the take home message.
There you have it. The disorder with no known cause, cure or prevention is nothing to worry about.
Experts like Doyle are never challenged by anyone in the media. Her words are accepted as fact, even though they make no sense in the face of reality
Doyle’s article deceptively ignores the fact that in 2002, the autism rate was one in 250. (There was a big expansion following changes in the DSM IV in 1994, and they’ve been unstoppable after that.)
I looked carefully at what Doyle wrote here, and I really couldn’t find convincing evidence to show that autism won’t keep increasing. Does she think that one in 36 is now the permanent statistic?
Just how good are doctors going to get at diagnosing autism? How much neurodiversity should we expect?
Doyle either hasn’t done the research on all the examples I’ve found showing much higher rates of autism across the world, or she doesn’t believe they’re worth mentioning.
Rather than take the word of someone specializing in neurodiversity, I’ll just refer to the top autism expert, Dr. Walter Zahorodny at Rutgers in New Jersey. He studies the autism rate in his state for the CDC, and it’s considered that most accurate.
Earlier this year Zahorodny was interviewed by Jill Escher, the president of the National Council on Severe Autism and a board member of Autism Society San Francisco Bay Area.
Zahorodny’s interview starts at 54:45
This is what he had to say
about the autism increases.
Autism is a highly prevalent disorder. Within a generation, we’ve seen autism, which used to be considered by everyone quite correctly as a rare disorder, as affecting at least three percent of eight year old children.
In some selected counties and regions of New Jersey, as many as five to seven percent of the pediatric population.
There’s no doubt that autism is much more prevalent than many other childhood disorders and many more, much more common than many frequently encountered childhood diseases.
There’s no doubt as well that while New Jersey’s rate is quite high, we’re not the only region with high rates, but that these high rates are now reflected from data in California.
The increases are real, and they will continue to grow, according to Zahorodny.
My second and third premises or statements of what’s essential reflect the fact that autism has increased very dramatically in the sixteen year period from 2000 to 2016.
It’s increased across all subgroups, all forms of autism, across all demographic groups.
It’s increased in New Jersey from approximately one percent, 9.9 per thousands to now 31.4 per thousand, or three percent.
The trend identified in New Jersey is clearly mirrored or reflected by the trend the overall ADDM Network. . . .
Before the 1990s, autism prevalence was correctly identified to affect approximately 1/10th to 2/10th of a percent. . . .
The fourth object of my attention is that autism, in spite of better awareness, better recognition, is still widely UNDER DIAGNOSED.
We find that overall, in the period from 2000 to 2016, there was improvement in the rate of autism diagnosis. This was a significant improvement.
Nonetheless, even as late as 2016, twenty-two percent or one in five eight year olds who satisfied the case definition, who met the criteria for autism by our independent surveillance, did not have an autism diagnosis. . . .
And now we also understand that even in spite of better awareness, the true prevalence of autism is not merely the diagnosed cases. We still lag in our identification of autism prevalence. . .
Predictions/projections for the near future: MORE AUTISM
Autism prevalence for 2022—that is for the next surveillance cycle—will be higher than found previously. This is inevitable because autism prevalence has not peaked. . . .
Zahorodny expects the next rate increase will, no doubt, be attributed to better diagnosing once again.
Finally I would predict that the next report from the ADDM Network will not reflect significant public health concern or propose understanding autism risk factors or promotion of early detection.
Most likely the next report will mention better awareness and recognition as possible factors bearing on higher estimates.
This is a standard, almost magical Cohen that comes up every time the prevalence estimates are provided.
It’s unstoppable because we don’t know what’s causing it.
We really don’t understand what’s driving autism prevalence. We don’t know the risk factors, so the best one can say apparently is that the increase might be due to better awareness or recognition.
Nonetheless, we should be thinking of what to do better and what to do for the future.
Something in the environment is causing autism.
Without a doubt, the most important factors or improvements that we could recommend involve enhancing and promoting studies which attempt to identify autism risk factors and triggers.
These are not genetic factors. These are environmental factors and it’s necessary to understand which ones are driving and have driven autism prevalence twofold and threefold over the last fifteen years.
We have to do more early diagnosing because more children will have autism.
Since we don’t yet understand, and I see no prospect for understanding the autism risk factors or triggers in the near future, I think it’s very important that we try to promote universal autism screening of toddlers and preschool aged children. . . .
We need to prepare for autism eventually affecting all age groups.
Given the high an escalating rate of autism in our population . . .it’s essential that from the policy perspective, we plan and provide resources for care, services and interventions to individuals with autism, that we understand that autism is a lifelong condition. . . .
Zahorodny said the CDC isn’t interested in finding possible environmental factors for autism.
Unfortunately, no agency or program in the United States has the resources as the CDC to identify the potential risk factors for autism, and they’ve committed the most resources to identifying and to understanding this phenomenon, and yet we’ve gotten nowhere.
I’ve been part of the ADDM Network since 2000, and so I was there at the initiation and across the development and enhancement of the network. I think when we started there was true interest and excitement and surprise regarding the first of all high rates and the escalation of rates, but somewhere after third or fourth cycle, it become clear that there were no plausible ideas or hypothesis that the CDC felt compelled to investigate. It would be therefore less complicated and less dangerous to prevail with a search for risk factors.
It would be much less controversial to acknowledge what is possibly responsible for a small increase in case determination, that is better awareness.
It’s uncomfortable to identify a phenomenon and not to be able to explain it.
“Better diagnosing” can’t keep happening.
If some new phenomenon appears in our consciousness, we start understanding it and labeling it, and we get better at it. But it doesn’t go on indefinitely over a decade or generation.
The end of Escher’s interview with Zahorodny was quite chilling.
Escher:
I’ve been seeing some of these articles about the waitlist for diagnosis in the U.K. You saw what the prevalence numbers already are. They’re already three percent in the U.K., so it makes me wonder, what is going on there?
How higher can it go?
As we can see, there is no reason to believe that the autism rate is going to level off anytime soon. Nancy Doyle needs to talk to Dr. Zahorodny. He has the facts on his side. 50 percent of children with autism is not outside the realm of possibility, and it may come a lot sooner than 2050.
I have to believe that the public won’t continue to accept the claim that more and more autism is due to the enlightened doctors of the 21st century, especially when we’re all paying for the cost of lifetime care for all of these disabled people who were supposedly always here.
We learned this weekend that Sheila Lewis Ealey lost her battle with cancer this weekend. Anne had interviewed and written about Sheila over the years. Join us in sending condolences to her family, and pray for her autistic son most of all. How do we leave them behind?
###
By Anne Dachel
Sheila Lewis Ealey is an autism mom, an advocate, and is featured in ‘Vaxxed.’
Sheila was also in D.C. on March 31, 2017. Her message was clear: She vaccinated. Her son was severely damaged. She is now anti-vaccine.
Who could blame her? Not only was her vaccine injury case among the 5,000 omnibus claims of vaccine-induced autism that were thrown out of Vaccine Court, but as an African American mother with an autistic son, she has a personal connection to the fraud at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention revealed by William Thompson.
Govt "is too corrupt to trust them on these issues"
More of the remarkable and frank discussion on Kennedy’s vision of his presidency.
He dismissed that idea that he’s anti-vaccine and revealed the liability-free status of the vaccine makers who have no incentive to produce a safe product.
Kennedy was asked if education is “on the brink of catastrophic collapse”?
Kennedy: I think it’s already collapsed.
The outcomes that you just inventoried is evidence of an utter collapse of the system. We can fix the system, but you need to be able to do something disruptive.
Kennedy was asked about taxes, and he said he wouldn’t raise taxes. He was adamant that we can’t continue spending and adding trillions more to the national debt.
Kennedy pointed out that the chronic disease epidemic is costing us $4.3 trillion
We have to end that. We have to or we’re dead. It’s 4.3. It’s five times our military budget. We’ve gone from six percent of GDP to healthcare to about 18 percent. Six percent when my uncle was President, 18 percent today, and it’s growing exponentially.
Note: On Saturday, former President Trump survived an assassination attempt by a 20 year old male described by peers as loner who was endlessly bullied in school. For a moment, I had a flashback to Adam Lanza, who murdered 26 school kids and staff a mere 14 miles up the road from me in Sandy Hook, Connecticut. As the story unfolds, we are mindful that our language matters. All of us at Age of Autism have weathered barbs and arrows over the years, and maybe we've tossed a few ourselves. When rhetoric causes active harm, it's time to ask hard questions. And I hope our nation will. Anne Dachel transcribed an interview with Presidential Candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. whom we are proud to call a friend and supporter. Few know the intimate agony of an assassination like he. Pray for his safety. For for the United States of America.
###
RFK Jr. reveals the "corporate capture" of our regulatory agencies, media and political parties
THERE IS NO OVERSIGHT
After listening to the facts that Robert Kennedy, Jr. reveals about our regulators there is only one conclusion: THERE IS NO OVERSIGHT.
Our federal health agencies have been bought by the industries they’re supposed regulate.
RFK Jr. Part one
| Part 1 | Ep. 228 | Phil in the Blanks Podcast
Dr. Phil: As we enter the heart of the 2024 presidential race, RFK Jr. aims to do what no third party candidate has ever done: win the presidency.
Will we have another Kennedy in the White House, or will he tip the scales towards either former President Trump or President Biden?
This is a pivotal moment in American politics, reminiscent of those rare occasions when a third party candidate shook up the status quo. . . .
Tonight I’ll dive into where RFK Jr. stands in one of the highest stakes elections of our lifetime. . . .
Could he be the wildcard no one saw coming?
Dr. Phil asked Kennedy why he wants to be President.
Kennedy: . . .I saw something happening to my country that I couldn’t really imagine. I saw this huge division that’s so toxic now and so poisonous. . . .
I don’t think we’ve seen anything like this since the American Civil War, and it’s all amplified by the social media algorithms that are pushing us further and further into our positions into these kinds of tribal positions.
But the origin of it is, I believe, the capture of our political parties by corporate interests, and the corruption that’s come from that, and the political parties are fueling that fire.
I think this presidential campaign will cost about $15 billion, and that money is coming from these big corporations and this new kind of oligarchy of billionaires, and when donate the money, they expect something in return.
It’s transformed the political parties away from democracy. Their function is to advance the mercantile interests of the corporations that are funding them.
Dr. Phil: Is that true on both sides, Democrat and Republican?
Kennedy: . . . They’re both owned by interests that are not necessarily America’s interests.
And I felt I was in a unique position to talk about this because I’ve spent my entire career, 40 years suing agencies and large polluters and the agencies that they’ve now captured.
I’ve sued almost all of them. I’ve sued EPA as much as any other attorney. I’ve sued CDC, NIH, FDA, the public health agencies, the FCC, the USDA. And when you do this litigation, yu get a PhD in corporate capture and how to unravel it.
I also had a clarity of vision about what this country is supposed to look like, and I feel I’m in a unique position to see how far it departed from those values.
Dr. Phil asked Kennedy about his chances of winning and Kennedy is confident he can.
11:23
Kennedy: . . . There’s an entire national press out there that is very opposed to me.
I would say to people is just listen to what I’m saying rather than other people’s characterizations of me, and that’s the most I can do.
I know that what I’m doing right now is what I’m supposed to be doing. So I feel comfortable in my soul with that decision, and I’m working aw shard as I can to make sure, to save this country.
Ultimately, it’s in God’s hands.
I have to work as hard as I can, and the slings and arrows that I take from people outside need to be irrelevant to me. . . .
Dr. Phil asked Kennedy if he has a perception problem, and Kennedy agreed he does.
13:55
Kennedy: . . . Let me give you an example: the connection between atrazine, which is a chemical that is in about 63 percent of America’s water supply.
There has been an increase in gender dysphoria in this country, and we should be looking at reasons for that.
There’s been a series of studies including one by a very famous scientist called Tyler Hayes at the University of Berkley, published in the National Academy of Sciences journal, in which he took about 100 frogs, it may have 70, and subjected them to atrazine at the levels that the EPA considered safe.
They were all male frogs, and 70 percent of those frogs became chemically castrated. Ten percent of the male frogs turned female and began producing fertile eggs.
I’ve been working on endocrine disruptors which are a class of chemicals like PCBs that I’ve been working on for 40 years that affect sexual development.
It’s not a theory. It’s not a conspiracy theory. It’s well-documented. So what I said in that case is, I don’t know if it’s affecting gender dysphoria. I don’t know if atrazine is, but isn’t it something that we ought to study? . . .
Kennedy went on to connect mass shootings in the U.S. to the new class of drugs, SSRIs and benzos that have a black box warning about suicidal and homicidal behavior.
18:35
I have a perception problem particularly in the mainstream media. . . .
Dr. Phil noted that people aren’t getting to hear what Kennedy has to say.
You need to listen to what he has to say before you make up your mind.
Kennedy:
I have a big conversion rate when people actually listen to me. . . .
The mainstream media, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, ABC and CBS, won’t allow me on to do a live interview. Most of them won’t even allow a taped interview.
I’ve only done one live interview on CNN, but otherwise they won’t let me on to do that.
Dr. Phil asked him why that is. “What are they afraid of?”
Kennedy: I think there is a political alignment now with the media. They’re overtly either Democrat or Republican, and I think the Democratic oriented networks, they feel like I’m going to be a threat to President Biden if I’m even allowed on the air.
And there’s other more complex motives. One is they get so much of their revenue from pharmaceutical interests.
Roger Ailes, he was very supportive of me. He was the founder of Fox News, and I came to him in 2014 with a documentary that I helped create about mercury in vaccines. I showed it to him and he was completely persuaded by this documentary, but he said, I can’t let you get on to talk about it because we get 70 percent of our revenues in the evening news shows come from the pharmaceutical companies.
I think all the networks are under that kind of pressure.
The unholy alliance between the drug companies and our federal regulatory agencies
Dr. Phil: Let me ask you this about Big Pharma, and this is about vaccines.
You say that the government regulators have been bought off by Big Pharma. . . .
You said agency employees are actually getting royalties, getting payments on vaccines and drugs that they approve.
Is that true?
Kennedy: Yes, there’s a couple of things happening.With FDA, about 50 percent of FDA’s budget comes from regulated industries, so mainly the pharmaceutical industries.
You have agency capture on steroids.
The principal objective of FDA today is to serve the mercantile interest of pharmaceutical companies, and that’s why you see FDA not only approving all of these drugs that shouldn’t be approved, but they are also out to destroy things that are actually shown to be good for you, that do not make profits for the pharmaceutical companies.
Then talking about NIH
Kennedy: In 1980, we passed a law called the Bayh-Dole Act. The Bayh-Dole Act, for the first time, allowed individual scientists and NIH as the agency to collect royalties on drugs on which they had done research.
It really transformed, that law really transformed NIH.
When I was growing up, NIH was only 15 minutes from my home. . . . I wanted to be a scientist when I was a kid, so I went to NIH all the time to look at the rats and look through the microscopes etc.
It was the premier scientific agency in the world. Nobody in the world had anything like that, and they would look to America for science, particularly for medical research, biomedical research.
After the Bayh-Dole Act, NIH began slowly migrating from a scientific research agency to a drug development incubator.
In 2016 . . . there were about 220 new drugs approved by FDA, and 100 percent of them came out of NIH.
For example, the Moderna vaccine. NIH owns half of that vaccine, 50 percent. So the billions of dollars that the vaccine makes, half of that goes to NIH, the agency, but there’s also individuals, at least four, maybe six, who work for NIH who are the high level deputies under Anthony Fauci, who get to collect $150,000 a year forever, not just for their lives, but their children, as long as that mRNA technology is on the market, they’re going to be making money from it. That is a conflict.
Dr. Phil responded by asking Kennedy if NIH was getting a “kickback, a bribe.”
Is this not a clear conflict of interest? . . .
Why are you the only one talking about this?
Kennedy: If you talk about this kind of thing, you get censored on YouTube. You will not be allowed on the mainstream media to talk about these issues.
It used to be that you could, but nowadays, you cannot.
Dr. Phil: If there’s some rational reason for it, why would they try to censor and hide it?
Kennedy: I think it was an idealistic reason. It was 1980, right? It was the tie in the Reagan Revolution. If you put privatized incentives into the government agencies, they would function better and more efficiently.
Dr. Phil asked about alternative treatments.
Kennedy: The whole approval of the Moderna vaccine and the Pfizer vaccines during COVID required them to suppress any other therapeutic drugs that may have been effective against COVID, and a lot believe, including myself, that there were therapeutics that were very, very effective against COVID, like Ivermectin, like hydroxychloroquine. In fact there were many, many others.
They were deliberately suppressed because the government wanted to issue these emergency use authorizations, and it would have been illegal if they acknowledged that there was an existing drug that was approved for any purpose that was effective against COVID.
Dr. Phil called this another conflict of interest.
Kennedy: We had 16 percent of the COVID deaths in the United States, and we only have 4.2 percent of the world’s population.
We literally did worse than any country in the world, at least by that data point.
And I think one of the reasons was the systematic suppression of things that could have helped patients in hospitals all over the country. . . .
Everybody was directed down one path, and it was the path that was being dictated from above.
Dr. Phil summarized the mismanagement of the COVID pandemic and what was forced on the American people. He questioned the motives of the people in charge.
He asked Kennedy about the COVID vaccine.
Kennedy: Well, it was the deadliest in terms of how many deaths were reported to the VAERS database.
Now you don’t know causation. I took the vaccine, and the next day I had a heart attack or a stroke or myocarditis, you can’t say for sure that that injury was attributable to that correlation . . . but when you see this huge uptick within, I think, the first year of the release of the COVID vaccine, there were more reports to COVID sic of deaths and injuries than all vaccines put together for the previous almost 36 years.
In that sense, yes, it was the deadliest vaccine ever.
Part of that is that it was mandated for so many people.
“Corporate capture”
Dr. Phil asked Kennedy how he would handle the corporate capture of our federal agencies.
Kennedy: I think each agency, you have to address because they all have unique structures.
Part of the problem is policy and structure and part of it is personnel.
If there’re perverse incentive like at FDA where 50 percent of the budget comes from pharma or NIH where regulators are getting paid to make sure drugs get on the market.
Congress actually had hearings on it, and Anthony Fauci testified at those hearings because he was making money on some of these drugs that he had developed.
So you have a scientist who is supposed to be looking for problems in that drug, that’s what his job is as a regulator. Find the problems to make sure you’re protecting the public.
But if he’s paying for his mortgage, and he’s paying for his children’s education, he’s paying for his boat, he’s paying for his alimony from that $150,000 a year, you could expect and you could predict that he’s going to be less vigilant about finding problems.
That’s what we call a perverse incentive
The people who tend to get promoted are people who are willing to carry water for the industry.
The regulators become sock puppets of the industry, and when people get to the end of their careers for a government agency, they go to work for the industry they regulated.
So right before they leave they tend to do a lot of favors for those industries, and they’re senior management, and that example, that bad example tends to percolate downward throughout their whole division. . . .
These are all swamp creatures, and it amplifies that corporate capture that we see. . . .
I understand the perverse incentives that need to be changed right away in order to change agency culture and get them doing what they’re supposed to be doing which is serving the public interest and protecting public health.
We’re now the unhealthiest country in the world.
We have the highest chromic disease burden in the world.
When my uncle was President, six percent of Americans had chronic disease. Today almost 60 percent do, and nobody’s doing anything about this.
Nobody’s talking about the autism rates in my generation, depending on which study, one in 2,500 or one in 10,000,
In my kids’ generation is one every 34 kids, one in every 22 boys.
So Congress said to EPA, tell us what year the autism epidemic began?
EPA came back and said it’s a red line, 1989, so something happened in 1989.
So something happened in 1989. We know this epidemic is not happening because of genes. Genes don’t cause epidemics, as you know. You need an environmental toxin.
So why aren’t we looking for what toxin it was that hit every demographic? It became ubiquitous in `1989, and those are the studies that I’m going to get them to do as President.
Finally Dr. Phil asked Kennedy about election integrity.
Kennedy said we could fix the problem. Republicans and Democrats need to work together to solve this. Kennedy wants a free government issued photo ID for voting and paper ballots along with a low threshold for recounts.
So why isn’t “corporate capture” the biggest issue in our presidential race? How much worse does the corruption at the highest levels of government have to get before we see something change? The regulators and the media are in the pay of industry, and their job is to lie to us.
Health care has become sick care in this country and many people want it to continue. There is so much money to be made.
##
Get to know The Real Anthony Fauci in this #1 best seller from Skyhorse Publishing.
Anthony Fauci seems to have not considered that his unprecedented quarantine of the healthy would kill far more people than COVID, obliterate the global economy, plunge millions into poverty and bankruptcy, and grievously wound constitutional democracy globally.
ONE IN 22 ISN'T ALL THAT UNIQUE, IN FACT IT'S EXPECTED
A story from KPBS in San Diego caught my attention for two reasons.
First of all, it was about efforts to provide something significant in the lives of autistic young people.
July 8, 2024, KPBS: Why a San Diego surf camp for people with autism doubled in size
On a Monday morning, long lines of surfboards stretched down La Jolla Shores. On them, children practiced — paddle, paddle, paddle! — scooping at the sand, pressing themselves into "seal position," and popping into a crouch.
Outside one blue tent, the boards were taken by a dozen children and young adults somewhere on the wide spectrum of autism, each with their own coach. It was day one of a four-day surf camp. . . .
Parents started this surf camp 22 years ago.
It’s run by the Autism Society of San Diego and supported by state and county funds.
Adults running the program genuinely want these children to succeed, and I can only imagine how grateful parents are for this opportunity.
The other thing that stood out to me was this information:
The demand reflects San Diego’s unique population.
Nationally, 1 in 36 children are diagnosed with autism. Korogi said in San Diego, it’s 1 in 22.
“Almost every single classroom has at least one individual with autism,” she said.
San Diego offers better services for people with autism than many places in the country, Korogi said. Military families request to be stationed here to access those services, driving up the numbers.
Dear Readers, did you know that Andy Wakefield has produced a full length feature film about a vaccine whistleblower? It's called Protocol 7. As the saying goes, "Truth is stranger than fiction." And after years of documentaries covering a wide range of autism and vaccine topics, we now have a fictional tale plucked from what SHOULD have been the headlines, but was buried. Our Anne Dachel interviewed Andy in May (see our post including the video interview below.) You can host a screening in your local theatre. And the site runs a list of all of the showings.
BEST OF ALL - the Protocol 7 website has an "at a glance" Know The Risks page that you can forward to friends and family with a succinct, graphic synopsis of the pediatric vaccination schedule. As a rule, we are an - ahem - overly wordy group. So the graphic presentation is fabulous. Share!
###
Age of Autism, May 23, 2024
Protocol 7 Movie Bring Things That Go MUMPS In The Night To The Theatre
"Merck has not essentially denied committing (mumps vaccine) fraud."
So excited to share a new FEATURE length movie from Andy Wakefield. Protocol 7 is a plucked from real life thriller about a whistleblower who exposes problems with the mumps component of the Merck MMR vaccine. The truth is still unfolding in a Pennsylvania court.
Vaccine injury and pharma malfeasance are no longer rated "X" as a topic for public interest. Audiences are aware of the grip pharma has on our government, public health and medical community, because of the Covid lockdown and vaccine mandates that touched everyone. Moviegoers are READY for Protocol 7. Click HOST A PROTOCOL 7 SCREENING to learn how you can get involved and help promote the movie too. Anne Dachel sat down with the director, one Andrew J. Wakefield, to talk about this film, so many years in the making.
###
By Anne Dachel
I recently had the opportunity to interview Dr. Andrew Wakefield about his latest project, the full length movie, Protocol 7.
Protocol 7 reveals more of the nefarious history of the vaccine industry in America, this time involving the mumps component in Merck’s MMR vaccine.
The movie itself, Protocol 7, this is my first venture into a full length narrative feature film, unlike documentaries in the past. So it’s a whistleblower story in the genre Erin Brockovich or the Insider.
It’s very exciting. People love an insider story.
It tells the story based on truths of a whistleblower, two whistleblowers in a vaccine lab with reports that they were asked to participate in a fraud, what they considered to be a fraud.
It centered around the efficacy, the protective ability of the mumps vaccine which has been failing for many years. They knew this as early as the late 90s. They still persisted. They had an option either to scrap it, do a recall and make a safer vaccine, BUT potentially lose the American market, lose the market worldwide OR to fake the data. That’s what the whistleblowers reported to me.
So it’s been there for a long time. The story’s been there for a long time. It’s in federal court in Pennsylvania at the moment on appeal.
Thank you to Anne Dachel for her transcription genius. Watch the interview, if only to see for yourself why neither Trump nor Biden wanted Kennedy in the debate. His ability to remember, distill and share facts is exceptional.
By Anne Dachel
Bobby Kennedy is an incredible speaker. Without notes he can cite statistics that show his vast command of information on so many issues vital to Americans.
This was never more evident than during a recent talk with former Navy SEAL and CIA contractor, Shawn Ryan on his podcast.
It was over two and a half hours long, and it was fascinating in its entirety. What really stood out to me was 10 minutes of the interview at 1 hour, 52 minutes.
(Transcribed below)
Here Kennedy talked about SIMPSONWOOD, which was a clandestine meeting of health officials, scientists and vaccine makers held at a secluded conference center in Norcross, GA in June 2000, 20 miles from CDC headquarters in Atlanta.
During this two day meeting, attendees talked about the evidence of a clear link between the vaccines kids were getting and the explosion in neurological disorders, most notably autism.
On the first day they talked about the evidence they were seeing, and the second was all about how to cover it up.
Shawn Ryan Show June 17, 2024
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. - CIA Propaganda & Information Manipulation
The part on Simpsonwood 1:52:20
Shawn Ryan asked Robert Kennedy,Is there anything in that is in the media about you that is completely false?
Note: Anne Dachel has been writing about the meteoric rise of special education for almost 18 years. Why is it that the world can "unite" (in some fashion) behind say, climate change or a pandemic, and radically alter behavior? And yet, children suffering and unable to learn goes unnoticed? Money. Our big "problems" are really big markets where billions are at stake. Color us jaded. Green, like money.
By Anne Dachel
The BBC is one of the most well-known news outlets in the world, perhaps the most esteemed one out there. Their stories are cited everywhere by other print and broadcasts news sources.
The BBC is supposed to be journalism at its best, giving us thoroughly investigated news reports.
The truth is, the BBC is an example of the epic failure of the media today when it comes to the decline of children in the 21st century. After two decades of following autism coverage from sources all over the world, I can say that the BBC, more than any other news outlet, reports on the massive numbers of special needs children. They do it constantly!
Actually, when it comes to the enormous and ever-increasing costs of special education and the increasing demand because of more and more disabled children flooding British schools, the BBC is more like a foreign visitor who just landed in the country.
It isn’t that the BBC doesn’t report on the soaring costs and numbers, and the fact that students have “more complex needs,” it’s just that they don’t see any real crisis.
A story one day has no relationship to the next story they publish.
The BBC does this kind of reporting on almost a daily basis, so you’d think someone there would ask the million dollar question: WHY ARE THERE ALWAYS MORE DISABLED STUDENTS?
Will! LOOK OUT!!! Your 1970s Saturday morning friend just might be.... YOUR CHILD! Autism and Neanderthal genes. I think I prefer being a refrigerator Mom to a cave woman.
By Anne Dachel
Autism is now one of the most common developmental disorders affecting children worldwide, with ever-increasing rates no health official can reasonably explain, and it’s also the subject of endless research that leads nowhere.
Over the past 20 years there have been lots of worthless studies showing “associations” between autism and old moms, fat moms, drinking moms, smoking moms, moms who marry old dads, moms who don’t get the right vitamins, moms who have babies too close together, and moms who live too close to freeways. There are more, but this is a good sample.
The message: Autism is a puzzle that we just have to keep investigating.
I like to call all this “autism busywork.” Now the latest “groundbreaking study” is from Loyola University in New Orleans.
We’re told the researchers have found “a primary cause of autism,” and it’s GENETIC. This time it’s a genetic variant linked to our Neanderthal ancestors.
Loyola University New Orleans and Clemson University researchers uncover a primary cause of autism
A landmark study recently published in the prestigious science journal Nature: Molecular Psychiatry has unveiled a new discovery in autism research. The research is the first to show that certain genetic traits inherited from Neanderthals play a significant role in autism. Dr. Emily Casanova, assistant professor of neuroscience at Loyola University New Orleans, co-authored this pioneering work alongside her esteemed colleagues at Clemson University.
We are clearly at a point in the autism epidemic where no one questions anything.
No longer do the numbers bother anyone. The current average rate of one in 36 U.S. children will, no doubt, be increased to one in 29 (the rate now in British Columbia), or one in 25 (the rate in Australia), or one in 23 (the rate inScotland), or one in 22 (the rate in California), or one in 21 (the rate in Ireland), or maybe one in 20 (the rate in Northern Ireland). It doesn’t matter because health officials never acknowledge that there’s ever been a real increase in autism.
And we aren’t really talking about the cause of all this autism anymore. After 25 years of always increasing statistics, everyone seems happy to leave things be. We’ve long been told that no one really knows why a child has autism. It’s probably genetic with maybe bad choices by parents. We’ve had two decades of studies showing a connection to fat moms, moms on antidepressants, drinking moms, old moms, moms who marry old dads, moms who don’t get the right vitamins, moms who have babies too close together, and moms who live too close to freeways.
It’s all just part of the puzzle that is autism.
This serious developmental disorder with no known cause, prevention or cure is here to stay. If it’s your child, learn the signs and get that all important early intervention. There’s nothing else you can do.
Nothing demonstrates where we’re at better than two recent stories on Fox 2 in St. Louis.
I was struck by the fact that Fox 2 put the stories out one day apart.
The coverage was about autism therapy providers offering Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA) services.
The big news about kids and developmental health is more ADHD, lots more. Of course no one is in a panic, and, you guessed it, it’s due to GREATER AWARENESS, the effects of COVID, modern living, etc.
The increase, unlike autism, is described as real. More kids really do have ADHD, but like autism, this is acceptable.
Officials describe the rise in ADHD as an “ongoing and expanding public health concern,” which sounds similar to their reference to autism as “a serious public health concern” many times in the past. The message is, of course, nothing here is a crisis.
May 24th, Scripps News: CDC reports sharp rise in ADHD diagnoses among children during the pandemic; 1 in 9 children ages 3-17 were diagnosed with ADHD as of 2022, study finds.
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder cases have risen considerably in the U.S., according to a new study by researchers with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention..
The study released on Wednesday said 1 in 9 children ages 3-17 had been diagnosed with the disorder at some point in their life as of 2022.
Roughly 5.4 million kids actively had ADHD in 2016, but just six years later, the number had increased to over 6.5 million. The jump in diagnoses may be good as kids are getting screened more.
COVID
The study notes, however, that the pandemic might have had a role in the higher number of children diagnosed with ADHD.
"Children experiencing symptoms of stress, depression, and anxiety during the pandemic may also exhibit symptoms of inattention and impulsivity, potentially leading to a diagnosis of ADHD when other diagnoses may be more appropriate," the study says.
"Merck has not essentially denied committing (mumps vaccine) fraud."
So excited to share a new FEATURE length movie from Andy Wakefield. Protocol 7 is a plucked from real life thriller about a whistleblower who exposes problems with the mumps component of the Merck MMR vaccine. The truth is still unfolding in a Pennsylvania court.
Vaccine injury and pharma malfeasance are no longer rated "X" as a topic for public interest. Audiences are aware of the grip pharma has on our government, public health and medical community, because of the Covid lockdown and vaccine mandates that touched everyone. Moviegoers are READY for Protocol 7. Click HOST A PROTOCOL 7 SCREENING to learn how you can get involved and help promote the movie too. Anne Dachel sat down with the director, one Andrew J. Wakefield, to talk about this film, so many years in the making.
###
By Anne Dachel
I recently had the opportunity to interview Dr. Andrew Wakefield about his latest project, the full length movie, Protocol 7.
Protocol 7 reveals more of the nefarious history of the vaccine industry in America, this time involving the mumps component in Merck’s MMR vaccine.
The movie itself, Protocol 7, this is my first venture into a full length narrative feature film, unlike documentaries in the past. So it’s a whistleblower story in the genre Erin Brockovich or the Insider.
It’s very exciting. People love an insider story.
It tells the story based on truths of a whistleblower, two whistleblowers in a vaccine lab with reports that they were asked to participate in a fraud, what they considered to be a fraud.
It centered around the efficacy, the protective ability of the mumps vaccine which has been failing for many years. They knew this as early as the late 90s. They still persisted. They had an option either to scrap it, do a recall and make a safer vaccine, BUT potentially lose the American market, lose the market worldwide OR to fake the data. That’s what the whistleblowers reported to me.
So it’s been there for a long time. The story’s been there for a long time. It’s in federal court in Pennsylvania at the moment on appeal.
Anne Dachel interviewed Dr. Andy Wakefield about his new feature film Protocol 7 - a story of a vaccine whistleblower starring Rachel Whittle, Matthew Marsden and Eric Roberts (I haven't looked yet, but I'm guessing he plays "the bad guy!") You can learn more and even sign up to host a screening here. We'll be sharing Anne's interview in the coming days.
But who could talk to Dr. Wakefield and not ask him about the huge increase in autism and its impact on families? We have an AofA category with posts we've written about Dr. Wakefield's journey from boy wonder British pediatric gastroenterologist to worldwide whipping boy for the protection of vaccine programs, governments and the pharmaceutical industry. Few men could have withstood the lashing in the court of public opinion and the British GMC (see photo) and yet stood by our children. We will always be grateful of his support and in awe of his continued work. Note, the videos are on Rumble. I'm hoping they embed properly. Here are the two links with this interview, in case. Part 1 Anne Dachel Interviews Andy Wakefield About Autism in 2024 and Part 2 Anne Dachel Interviews Andy Wakefield About Autism in 2024 KIM
###
Dr. Wakefield on the ever-increasing rates of autism around the world
During our talk, I asked Dr. Wakefield about the current situation with autism and the universal acceptance of these disabled children as simply part of human neurodiversity. Those in charge preach that autism has always existed, with no recognition that the stunning rates are real increases.
Am I surprised that the rates of autism that are now being reported, for example, Scotland, Northern Ireland, England and indeed in the U.S.?
The answer is, sadly, no.
I mean the graph, if one looks at the trend in autism numbers, incidence and prevalence; you see that they’re a dramatic and sustained increase.
It’s been predicted to reach one in two by 2032. Whether that holds up or not, I don’t know. Whatever, there is a huge epidemic of these neurodevelopmental disorders.
The notion that this is due to better diagnosis is utter nonsense.
This has been shown in the New Jersey numbers. We have the same people using the same diagnostic criteria over time. So using the same diagnostic instrument showing that there is a dramatic increase and saying this is nothing to do with better diagnosis.
That may account for a tiny percentage of it, but we’re having to meet the market demand, the sheer volume of these children coming through.
So originally, it was a reasonable hypothesis to say among the things that may account for this rise is better diagnosis. But it’s a testable hypothesis. It’s been tested, and it’s been found wanting. It does not explain what’s going on.
When I was first confronted with autism at the Royal Free Hospital in 1995, I didn’t even know what autism was. We weren’t taught about it as medical students because it was so rare.
Now the other thing, and this is something that’s rarely pointed out, is that medicine now does not encourage in the same way that medicine did historically, the diagnostic skills that are necessary to be a doctor.
We’ve got tests, we’ve got scans, blood tests, this, that and the other.
Back in the day, the best diagnostician, those who were the best observers and describers of human disease, they weren’t of this century, they weren’t even of the last century. They were of the century before.
They were people like Jean-Martin Charcot from the Salpêtrièrein, Paris.
People like Babinski who worked with him.
People like Freud who attended his lectures.
People like Gilles de la Tourette who described Tourette syndrome.
These physicians were outstanding at eliciting physical signs and symptoms, describing human disease, many of them they couldn’t do anything about.
They didn’t have antibiotics or other things at the time, but they were outstanding at describing diseases.
So if autism, if something as fascinating, dare I say it and idiosyncratic as autism had existed, it would have been described by these people.
It did not exist in anything like, anything like the numbers it does now.
If they had seen a case, they would have jumped, and they would have described it meticulously.
It didn’t happen. Why? Because it wasn’t there.
These are new. These are new kids on the block, terrifying in their frequency and their severity and the consequences for society as a whole, let alone the poor families who have to deal with it.
What does the future hold in terms of developmental disorders, autism?
It’s fairly dark at the moment, isn’t it?
It’s going to go on increasing until people more broadly in government, in the regulatory authorities, academia acknowledge that vaccines are a major part, a major part of causing this problem.
They cannot bring themselves to terms with that possibility at the moment. They can’t do it. It’s beyond their wildest imagination to admit that there is something that they believed in so firmly, so wholeheartedly for so long, that actually, they’re wrong.
Some people have invested their entire careers in being wrong. They just have yet to realize it.
And so we have a while to go.
However, there are two things in my experience, my recent experience as well, that have changed the dynamic, changed the perception of the public, and this is where, I think, the biggest change will come, is coming.
That is film. Film has had a profound effect.
Films like VAXXED and Plandemicand others have really woken a lot of people up, and the other is COVID itself.
It's always better diagnosing/greater awareness when it comes to autism
On May 17thUSA Today published the story, No link between National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, rise in autism rates | Fact check
It was written by Chris Mueller who was cited as their “Fact Check Reporter.”
The claim: National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act linked to increase in autism rates
A May 11 Instagram post shows a graph that depicts a decades-long rise in the rate of autism. The graph's title claims the rate of the condition has increased "277–fold" since 1970.
The graph includes a red arrow labeled "1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act," which points to an area on the graph that precedes a sharp rise.
"When something increases over 200-fold, it is not accidental," reads the post. "Such significant changes in a short span are intentional."
Mueller’s strategy here was to downplay autism and any increase in the disorder.
A chilling story came out of Ireland on May 10th. It was all about the unspeakable aspect of autism:
WHY DOES AUTISM KEEP INCREASING?
This legitimate question was raised by Mattie McGrath, a member of the Irish parliament, the Dail, and the questioner immediately came under fire.
May 10, 2024, The Journal: Senator tells TD: "You did not see children with difference in school because they were not allowed to attend"
During a debate on progressing special education provision in the Dáil yesterday, McGrath said there “must be a need for understanding the explosion of autism” and questioned why the number of diagnoses had increased.
McGrath said that his brother had worked in Africa as a paediatrician in the 1990s and when he returned to Ireland, it was the first time McGrath had heard the words autism, dyspraxia and dyslexia.
He said his brother was “very concerned” that “something was causing” autism “Because when I was going to school … we did not see these issues. There was some issues, but nothing like the amount there are now,” McGrath said.
Anne Dachel ran this post on her new Substack - you can subscribe here. We've waited too many election cycles for help to clear our way through the power and influence of the pharmaceutical industry. Its tentacles have wrapped around Americans' health in many ways including obesity, depression, heart disease, and the topic we know best, autism. It's hard not to feel jaded, like Charlie Brown looking at Lucy holding the football. Donald Trump was vociferous in his promise to drain the swamp, and specifically to take a hard look at autism. Joe Biden has not made strong promises, so there were fewer to break. Small comfort. Robert Kennedy is steadfastly moving ahead in the polls. Does he draw from Trump voters? Biden voters? The two party system has delivered precious little to us. If Trump or Biden can't win on their own, that doesn't make a third party candidate a "spoiler." Instead, it tells us that Americans want more choice. Ah, yes... choice. As ever, we will not endorse a candidate. Feel free to tell us your thoughts in the comments.
###
In this interview, Robert Kennedy, Jr. outlined what he will do to destroy the control the pharmaceutical industry has over the media in America.
We have the sickest generation of children in our history, and Kennedy wants to reverse this.
I personally see his description of the drug industry’s power over politicians and the news as the message everyone needs to hear. I wrote a book about it in 2014, The Big Autism Cover-Up: How and Why the Media Is Lying to the American Public.
Today, 10 years later, nothing has changed, except that the autism has gone from one in 68 children to now one in every 36. The news industry continues to lie to about every aspect of autism.
Even though autism wasn’t specifically talked about during this interview, it’s clearly one aspect of the culture of corruption, collusion and cover-up rampant in the “kleptocracy” Robert Kennedy described here.
May 3, 2024, Interviewer Joe Polish, founder of Genius Network, talks to Robert Kennedy, Jr.
From The Military Industrial Complex & Big Pharma
Joe Polish:
Why do you think the legacy, untrustable, government co-opted media is so scared of you?
Robert Kennedy, Jr.:
. . . They should be scared of me because I’m going to hurt their revenue streams a lot.
Thank you to our Anne Dachel for transcribing Polly Tommey's interview with Dr. Paul Thomas. She also ran this on her new Substack. Subscribe to Anne’s Substack.
From CHD-TV: "Pediatricians have more than a basic monetary incentive to vaccinate their patients — they are also motivated by the knowledge that they could lose their job if they don’t. In this special CHD.TV interview with Dr. Paul Thomas, viewers hear important insights on corruption in medicine, pandemic protocols, vaccine science, sudden deaths, natural immunity and more."
###
In this 26 minute interview, Dr. Thomas explains the truth about vaccines as the moneymaking focus of pediatric medicine. Watch at CHD-TV.
. . . At one point . . .we had. . . 15,000 active patients and 33 staff. Overhead, we were running through about $3 million in gross billings. That’s a big operation with a lot of overhead.
What wasn’t known to me actually until I really looked into it is that the income from vaccines was substantial. I got clued into it because I started getting more and more patients who didn’t want to vaccinate.
The only thing that was sacred in my practice was honoring informed consent. You couldn’t work for Integrative Pediatrics, which was my practice, unless you were willing to honor parents’ desires, whatever they were.
If they wanted to follow the CDC schedule, if they wanted to do some vaccines, if they wanted to do no vaccines, it was their choice.
Well, as other practices started kicking people out of their practices if they weren’t following the CDC schedule, I was getting more and more families who didn’t want to do any vaccines, which was fine with me.
I’d been doing enough research to understand there was definitely some benefits to not vaccinating—not financially though.
We took an entire month of every single billing sheet, and on every visit, on the back of that, our providers would mark off what vaccines we recommend according to the CDC schedule.
We're at the end of autism whatever you want month. Perhaps in May we can extoll cancer for its weight loss properties, unless it would tick of Ozempic. This week, we'll be taking a look at Donald Trump's latest scattershot attack on the very topic that launched Age of Autism. Not from a political POV. That’s outside our pay grade.
By Anne Dachel
The beginning of the end for Australia. This simply can’t continue.
Two articles, purporting to be the result of investigative journalism, were published by the Guardian on April 28th. They were about the impact disabled students are having on schools in Australia.
Reporter Sarah Martin wrote about the ongoing crisis in special education in Australia, but something critical was missing in both stories as you will see.
Almost a million Australian schoolchildren now have a disability – that’s one in four enrolments. Parents, teachers and advocates say education is at crisis point
It was a rather lengthy article, all about how schools in Australia continue to fail special needs children, most notably, those with autism and ADHD.
Patricia is the author of Outsmarting Autism: Build Healthy Foundations for Communication, Socialization, and Behavior at All Ages. She is a licensed Professional Counselor, with over 50 years experience, and the author of the best seller, Outsmarting Autism, interviews Moms, Dads, therapists, educators, and other professionals. They share clues they follow to help individuals of all ages, on the autism spectrum become the best version of themselves. Learn how biomedical, sensory, motor, visual, auditory, perceptual, homeopathic, detoxification, language, behavioral, social-emotional, energy, vagus nerve, and other therapies can heal our kids.
Patricia introduced the show and asked me about my experience being an autism advocate. She asked me about my son, John, who has high functioning autism.
Anne: When he was diagnosed, I was told this was a very rare condition. In my little town of 14,000, there probably wasn’t another child with autism. Now every school in this city has autistic kids.
It has been a leading advocate for autism, to inform parents, and to get recognition about what’s really happening. We live in a world that’s trying to normalize this condition, to pretend that this is just part of neurodiversity.
All we need is inclusion. If we just fund enough services, everything will be fine. Numbers don’t matter.
The message is clear: autism is a natural part of childhood. We need acceptance; we need to become autism friendly.
All these cities are becoming Certified Autism Centers.
It’s just bizarre. No one is worried about autism. We don’t care where it’s coming from.
We ignore things like regressive autism, and one out of every three children with autism actually regresses. They lose learned skills at some point and become autistic. No one cares why that’s happening.
There’s so much that’s just ignored by everyone.
Patricia said that I refer to this as the “autism cover-up.”
Anne: We’ve had IDEA, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, for almost 50 years. If we’ve had to educate disabled children, even if we didn’t know it was autism, we would be ready to accommodate these kids.
Everywhere, especially in the U.K., they’re going broke having to educate these children who really never were here before.
We DO celebrate our loved ones with autism. We honor them EVERY DAY by taking care of them, advocating for them, fighting tooth and nail for them. We do NOT CELEBRATE their autism. That's just nonsense. Plain and simple.
By Anne Dachel
There has been a flurry of news reports over the past several weeks telling us about autism awareness and autism acceptance and the reasons we should be celebrating all the people with autism today.
For those of us who’ve been involved with autism advocacy over the last 20 years, it all seems like nonsense. Somehow we’re supposed to pretend that having one in 36 children with autism is nothing new.
Actually, a whole month dedicated to normalizing a serious neurological disorder affecting evermore children may have a truly sinister purpose.
What if all this is nothing but a cover-up by those responsible for worldwide damage as a result of an ever-growing, unchecked, unsafe vaccine schedule?
There are many who believe it is.
A brilliant way to avoid culpability and continue the lucrative, liability-free scheme would be to rebrand the damage as something totally divorced from vaccine injury.
It is actually happening all around us if we care to look closely, and it is ingenious.
We live in a world where a neurological disorder affecting greater and greater numbers of children is now reduced to NEURODIVERISTY. We’re told this condition (not a disability) has always been part of human existence; it just took until the 21st century for experts to understand what it is.
Problem solved
This pretense of no real increase, just better diagnosing, has worked perfectly. No one challenges it. Faithful minions in the media do as they’re told and are now flooding the news with heartwarming stories about autism awareness/acceptance.
We’ve come so far
Doctors and health officials are great promoters of this mindset. They’re not worried about autism. In fact, the medical community has taken credit for the exponential increase in diagnoses due to better diagnosing on their part.
Donate - Thank You