"You say you want a revolution, I want a revelation . . ."

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-01938-8

"NIH-funded science must now be free to read instantly: what you should know"

or

how to create a s***load of revelation

Thank-you, NIH, and whomever made this a priority and pushed this effort ahead of its original start date, on behalf of everyone who ever wanted to read details instead of settling for abstracts (which are notorious for leaving out some of the most interesting details!) A win for EVERYONE, doctors, patients, pharmacists, natural health practitioners, librarians, toxicologists, environmentalists. Talk about a unifying move! Many medical communities beyond vaccine-safety advocates are cheering for this: cancer survivors, diabetes folks, autoimmune patients, mental health advocates, allergies, ADHD . . .
And how lovely to think that the AI medical industry may have a more updated database to pull from!

Looking at a "mind at work, look around look around . . ."

greyone,

I don’t see how Prasad’s “latest” restricted vaccine approvals are any different from what was in this NEJM article that he and Makary wrote on 5-20-25:
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsb2506929

The restricted vaccine approval/recommendation still seems to be approval and recommendation for all seniors, and for anyone 6 months and older who has one or more of the listed “underlying medical conditions” in chart 2 in the above article (which is, tragically, the majority of Americans).

Given the widespread, varied, and unconscionable adverse direct effects from the Covid injections (I am no longer referring to them as “adverse side effects”), which were wrongly and rapidly given an EUA, despite there being available treatments, and despite rushed “studies” for which the results were so bad that the shot makers did not want to turn over the results for 75 years (!) when ordered by a judge to do so, which were put into use with a BLANK piece of paper for the product insert, yet doctors were willing to inject their patients, and whose use was required (or mercilessly coerced) for participating in many aspects of society, keeping one’s job in many situations, remaining in one’s current living situation if a senior, and receiving healthcare and medical services in many situations, including life or death ones…given these FACTS, no sane, thinking, ethical, or moral person would be in favor of these injections being used on even one more person.

It is my hope that people will stop applauding these “steps” meant to look like “progress”, but which are nothing other than continuing the vaccine paradigm, profits, power, and resultant poisonings of and persistent problems for recipients from womb to tomb.

Amen, Kim!