Chris Exley Industry Supported Lies And Peer Reviewed Science
Note: We have been following Dr. Chris Exley's work for many years. He is an expert in aluminium (UK) toxicity. Aluminum is used as an adjuvant (activator) in vaccinations. It's morose cousin Mercury is used as a preservative. Two elements, one toxic result.
###
Flog a Dead Horse
Industry supported lies are peer reviewed published science apparently
Dr Christopher Exley
Apr 29, 2025
The Paul-Ehrlich-Institute (PEI) is the German equivalent of the US CDC. While it identifies itself as a Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines it is really just an offshoot of Pharma and makes very little effort to hide this fact.
One of its ‘researchers’ is Karin Weisser and for the last ten years or so she has endeavoured to produce ‘models’ of human exposure to aluminium and specifically models addressing human exposure to aluminium through vaccines and subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT). Essentially her goal is to prove that aluminium adjuvants used in vaccines and SCIT are harmless.
Her latest attempt is published in the Springer journal Archives of Toxicology. On the surface the paper appears as legitimate, even useful, science relating to human exposure to aluminium. I assume that the paper was peer-reviewed which means that at least two scientists considered the research worthy of publication. It would not have survived peer review should the manuscript have turned up on my desk. I might have conceded that the modelling methods were appropriate, I am not an expert in such modelling. However, I have forty years of experience of human exposure to aluminium and I would not concede that the data used in the modelling is appropriate. I would go further in that I would have to point out that the data modelled were hand-picked with a view towards proving the null hypothesis, that being, nothing to see here. Part of the process of peer review is to be helpful and informative assuming the authors of the research are unaware of possible deficiencies. In adopting this role I would ask the authors of the research how they can equate the aluminium concentration in serum and/or urine with exposure to aluminium as an adjuvant in a vaccine. I would ask them if they were not aware of seminal research in this field, for example research by Gherardi or Exley. In particular I would emphasise the critical importance of the cellular transport of aluminium, for example, loaded in white blood cells such as macrophages. I think I would go even further in insisting that the authors consider cellular transport of aluminium in their modelling and I would point out that the evidence now suggests that the brain damage observed in autism is caused by the transport of aluminium adjuvant from a vaccine injection site to the brain in white blood cells such as lymphocytes.
Weisser and colleagues have spent the last ten years producing models of human exposure to aluminium that not only deny the significance of aluminium adjuvants in human disease but seemingly would like us all to believe that the brain is not a target for aluminium. It seems that according to the PEI the Earth is flat and the aluminium age is a benign age. What I struggle to understand is why Weisser and colleagues adopt such blindsight in their science. They masquerade as true scientists and many will not see below their disguise. I can only assume that their non-science is well rewarded. When I asked the journal, Archives of Toxicology, published by Springer, why no information is given in the paper on how the research was funded. I received only silence in reply. READ MORE HERE.
Emma: Yes I remember Seneff, and her focus on Roundup. She is still around. Is she the reason that RFKennedy Jr talks about our pineal gland being all calcified, or something?
Chirs Exley put out the whole metabolic pathway of glyphosate and said that glyphosate has always been around since the beginning of time and was around in a plentiful form. But it is playing a role in getting aluminum through the membrane of leaves, just leaves , and probably a little through exposed skin.
I have had to spray our three farms fence rows for decades, during all that time there were some exposure and accidents. The hose did come off one time and drenched me really well all over. I jumped on the tractor and went back to the house for a shower. When I finished, I did notice metallic taste in my mouth. Not a good sign.
My forearms on the thumb side developed a lot of moles the last few years, and this winter many new ones popped up that were painful, red, and itching and made me some what fearful. I have been putting on DSM (something else that takes things through the skin) and ivermectin. These five months of constantly keeping both these things on my forearms has worked.
Almost all the moles have cleared up. I am some what amazed.
My forearms I would have exposed those a lot over the years as I held the sprayer, and switched back and forth as my hands became tired. I now put on wide wrist bands, very wide. If I had known, I would have always done that. Instead they could not claim it safe enough; that it was really safe, because only plants only have this enzyme.
But aluminum is not listed in the ingredients, not even as a possibility of an impurity. Formaldehyde is listed though. . Well that is in the vaccines and for all I know it is yet another over looked dangerous thing.
But Exley suspects it is aluminium, even if not listed.
Posted by: Benedetta | May 04, 2025 at 04:39 PM
Aluminum and Glyphosate Can Synergistically Induce Pineal Gland Pathology: Connection to Gut Dysbiosis and Neurological Disease
Stephanie Seneff1*, Nancy Swanson2, Chen Li1
https://foodshedalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/Aluminum_and_Glyphosate_Can_Synergistica.pdf
It makes sense that they would target the pineal gland. It is considered to be, since ancient times, the seat of the soul, the "third eye." God spoke to Joseph in a dream- the pineal gland is the sleep center of the brain. It has a diffuse blood supply and is not behind the blood-brain barrier. In my opinion, the 1987 vaccine schedule, which included aluminum, is enough to cause damage without glyphosate.
The pineal gland in pagan worship:
These Ancient Civilizations Knew About Our Third Eye
https://www.gaia.com/article/ancient-civilizations-knew-third-eye
Posted by: Emmaphiladelphia | May 03, 2025 at 07:40 PM
Benedetta, do you remember Stephanie Seneff, PhD, research scientist at MIT?
She appeared in VAXXED the movie and in 2014 claimed that, “At today’s rate, by 2025, one in two children will be autistic.” It was Seneff who quickly shifted the focus away from vaccines to her research on glyphosate. She never mentioned that it contained aluminum, just like some vaccines. I always thought she was sus.
MIT Researcher: Glyphosate Herbicide will Cause Half of All Children to Have Autism by 2025
https://healthimpactnews.com/2014/mit-researcher-glyphosate-herbicide-will-cause-half-of-all-children-to-have-autism-by-2025/
Posted by: Emmaphiladelphia | May 03, 2025 at 07:03 PM
Dr. Exley wrote a very interesting article on glyphosate just a month or so ago.
He said that glyphosate is a natural thing that occurs throughout nature, it has been with us since the beginning of life on this earth. He says it is not what is killing the weeds.
Dr. Exley says glyphosate is not doing what they say it is doing in the metabolism of that one enzyme of the plant. What is really happening, is that right before the step in the metabolism of glyphosate they claim is gumming up the gears; there is a step that is easily messed up by aluminum. He says it is working because glyphosate has aluminum in it, and glyphosate is just a way of getting aluminum inside the organism. Glyphosate very loosely, very loosely binds with aluminum, but can be absorbed by the leaves of a plant. That is true, you spray glyphosate on stems, or bark that does not have leaves, and it has no effect on the health of the plant. Glyphosate apparently goes through the leaves or skin, and transports the aluminum with it.
Oh okay, so that is what the experts meant! In the Roundup lawsuit trials; when they put the experts on the stand, the experts said that it was not the glyphosate that was the problem, but that did not mean that there was not additional stuff in the herbicide that was the problem. Oh, okay aluminum. I see.
Why have they been lying on how glyphosate really works? I am very puzzled. Are they in lock step with the other companies in hiding just how much of a neurotoxic aluminum really is.
I have to admit that I was very naive in what aluminum really does.
There was some mother testifying in front of Congress back in 2001 or was it 2002? She was saying they were detoxing her daughter after a vaccine, and getting tons of aluminum out. I admit I dismissed what she was saying and focused instead on what they were saying about mercury. Apparently I cannot concentrate on more than one toxin at a time. Besides that aluminum was sure not on my radar as a poison. My gosh we have cookware made of the stuff, they put it in our drinking water supply to make the water all clear, for heaven sakes! We drink soda pop out of aluminum cans, alum for years has been an ingredient in home made pickle making.
They are about to put Roundup, or Glyphosate out of business.
I for one am unsure if I can continue without it. Our little farm family is getting all scared like the other farmers that Del Bigtree was talking about.
We have fence rows to keep cleared out, and nothing does better, and or as "safe" as this product. Without it we would have to do it by hand, or use sprays that I know are dangerous. There is life on this earth that is prolific when it comes to growth like poison ivy, trumpet vine, cherry trees, cedars, as well as honeysuckle. RFKennedy Jr said they should have told us, and they should have. No it does not need to be sprayed on grain right before harvest, but it still has a use. It is still a safer way to go for what I use it for? It is because aluminum as Dr. Exley said combines, binds up so tight with silica. There will be no aluminum hanging around like arsenic, or lead, or other heavy metal or other forever organic compounds. IT could have been a great product, if not for a bunch of liars.
Fines I guess will follow, bankrupt companies. Which leaves us with no product, if used right that could have helped humanity. Meanwhile; the guilty go free to find another way to mess us all up. Too bad no Prison time for lying. Just makes me so mad. There are people needed to wearing orangs so bad.
We are probably even breathing it from the chemtrails above.
Posted by: Benedetta | May 03, 2025 at 12:03 PM
CDC sponsored libraries and museums for vaccine propaganda:
Communities for Immunity awards funding to 51 museums and libraries to advance vaccine confidence
September 22, 2021
https://community.astc.org/communitiesforimmunity/round-one-announcement2
Should citizens take up a collection to fund a vaccine "hol*cost" museum?
EXPOSED: How Militaries Worldwide Are Engineering DEPOPULATION
https://rumble.com/v6su1lv-the-silent-culling-how-militaries-worldwide-are-engineering-depopulation-w-.html?e9s=rel_v2_ep
Posted by: Emmaphiladelphia | May 03, 2025 at 11:07 AM
Why hasn't DOGE shut down the CDC museum?
Celebrating 30 Years of Vaccines for Children (VFC)
https://www.cdc.gov/museum/exhibits/vfc.html
Posted by: Emmaphiladelphia | May 03, 2025 at 10:51 AM
Dr Christopher Exley is to Aluminium as Boyd Haley is to Mercury a huge severe dose of truth, in pharmas lies.
Thanks Dr Exley for your truth seeking.
Pharma For Prison
MMR RIP
Posted by: Angus Files | May 01, 2025 at 02:24 PM