The Healthy American Has Questions for Kennedy
Political season is in full bloom. Peggy Hall, author of The Healthy American Substack has an article asking questions of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Questions that I think we need to ask the candidates as well. RFK Jr. has brought our issues to the forefront. It's nothing short of astounding. Only a handful of men have risked so much taking on pharma sacred cows. Andrew Wakefield. Dan Olmsted. David Kirby. To name a few. I worry about this new MAHA slogan though. Make America Healthy Again requires that Americans A) acknowledge their deficient health status and B) want to make complicated, difficult and often "heretical" choices rather than rely on quick fixes. MAGA was easy enough to understand. Most of us (I hope) think the USA is pretty great - despite our foibles. Asking Americans to get healthy? That's a gigantic ask of a stagnant, distracted population many of whom have NEVER known health, including parents of children profoundly less healthy than previous generations. Chronic disease is the norm. SpongeBob inhalers and pill bottles stored at school, and fear of a PB&J at the lunch table are all taken in stride as America limps along. Let's keep the dialog going and the questions flowing, as we move into Autumn.
We exist for one reason - AUTISTIC CHILDREN (many of whom are now adults.) Hall's article is sharp, and pulls no punches. But I think RFK, Jr. has proven over and over his bona fides to us. Jump in the ring and share your thoughts.
I've excerpted Ms. Hall's Substack and you can link over and comment as you wish.
###
By Peggy Hall, The Healthy American
Let me state from the outset that RFK Jr has definitely raised awareness about vaccine injuries. Parents who might never have known about the link between vaccines and damage to the nervous system, life-long side effects like autism, immune disorders, allergies, learning disabilities and so much more are waking up to these horrors. So Kennedy’s work in raising awareness of vaccine injuries definitely gets a round of applause, wouldn’t you say?
But I believe he doesn’t go far enough. Here are the questions I would ask him:
Why the Focus on Vaccine Safety?
Kennedy talks a lot about "vaccine safety." But why not focus on the harms, dangers, and side effects? Some say this is how he gets around censorship, but I’d like to hear him explain that himself.
Where's the Push to Repeal Heinous Laws?
Kennedy's website gives little attention to repealing the 1986 law that removed liability for pharmaceutical companies. This law created a vaccine court with a mere $250,000 cap for damages—an amount that's woefully inadequate for families affected by vaccine injuries. Why isn’t he fighting to repeal this?
Why Advocate for More Vaccine Testing?
Kennedy has called for expanded safety testing for childhood vaccines. But what does that really mean? Who are the guinea pigs (*cough* children? *cough*), and how reliable are the results from these pharmaceutical companies?
What do you mean by “Restore Confidence in Regulatory Agencies?”
Kennedy talks about "restoring confidence" in agencies like the CDC and FDA. But did we ever have confidence in them to begin with? I never did. And why doesn’t he ever mention that his uncle, JFK, was the one who got the ball rolling with the childhood pin-cushion programs through his initiation of federal government assistance for vaccine programs in public schools?
How Do You Define Democracy, and Why Don’t You Refer to it Correctly as a Constitutional Republic?
Kennedy frequently mentions "democracy" but rarely talks about our constitutional republic. Does he understand the difference? A pure democracy lacks the guardrails that a constitutional republic provides, and those guardrails are crucial to protecting our freedoms. I’ve heard you refer to it as a constitutional democracy, or something similar, but you didn’t refer to it as a constitutional republic—I know that for sure. So, why? Why are you so reluctant to use that phrase? Now, I’m not going to assume you’re using the word “democracy” like a socialist, because socialists love to use that word—it’s kind of a step toward socialism. So, I’m asking you directly: Why do you keep using the word “democracy,” and why don’t you talk about restoring our freedom, our constitutional republic, or our Constitution? READ MORE AT THE HEALTHY AMERICAN HERE.
###
Unavoidably Unsafe: Childhood Vaccines Reconsidered
Authors: Dr. Edward Geehr and Dr. Jeffrey Barke
In Unavoidably Unsafe, Dr. Edward Geehr and Dr. Jeffrey Barke confront the prevailing beliefs surrounding childhood vaccines with unflinching scrutiny and bold insight. Drawing on decades of clinical experience and exhaustive research, the authors challenge conventional wisdom. Unavoidably Unsafe is not an indictment of vaccines but a call to arms for informed decision-making and transparency in healthcare. Geehr and Barke aim to empower parents, guardians, and healthcare providers with the knowledge needed to navigate the complex landscape of childhood immunization responsibly.
In a rapidly evolving medical landscape where uncertainties abound, Unavoidably Unsafe serves as a beacon of clarity and integrity, reaffirming the importance of critical thinking and patient-centered care in safeguarding the health and well-being of future generations.
Well said Peggy and saving people we all try on here.The only point I would say is given the choices you in America have and had who might give a slight diffrence,I would say Trump RFK and co give a slight diffrence.If I were in America I would have to vote trump as there is nobody else closely talking on the same zipcode as us on here..Trump and RFK admit to knowing about vaccine damage nobody else does the rest deny.
Thanks for the article and your views spot on.
Pharma For Prison
MMR RIP
Posted by: Angus Files | September 14, 2024 at 01:56 PM
Hi Kim,
Thank you for sharing the excerpt from my substack article. Many people are shocked when they see the videos I share of RFK Jr in his own words stating again and again that he is "pro-vaccine" and even "fiercely pro-vaccine."
I get that some people experience cognitive dissonance and are unable to make their views of Kennedy comport with reality. This is what gives rise to comments like Lynn Barton's, where she calls me destructive and an extremist, without giving any objective evidence of this.
Lynn, if you are reading this, please state the truth I distorted about a subject you said you know about personally. I checked my email and substack and there is no record of you having contacted me to express your concerns. I am on the record to clear up any mis-statements or clarify my perspective.
You say I am an extremist and that makes it "dangerous to get things done." You must be unaware of the thousands of lives and jobs I've saved from bing harmed by the vaccines, in my work educating people about standing up for their rights on the job, in colleges and in medical settings. It was my work that resulted in SouthWest Airlines revoking their vaccine mandates, as did Wells Fargo, Amtrak and many others.
Employees came to me for my help in successfully avoiding the covid vaccine (and others) These individuals worked for Moderna, Pfizer, the CDC, the FDA, countless government agencies (in addition to many many private companies like Google, Netflix, ABC, Disney and countless others).
Extremist? Dangerous? Destructive?
Thousands would say quite the opposite: Empowering, Effective, Determined, Dedicated to truth.
As the Bible says, "You will know them by their fruit."
This is what I request of RFK Jr: to be consistent in his message, and to clarify his position of pressing for more testing of vaccines on children. This is reprehensible and I can't believe that anyone who has been affected by these harmful products would want there to be expanded testing!
To answer the common justification RFK Jr supporters make, which is, "He knows there can never be a safe vaccine; he's just saying that."
Or, as Lynn proposes, "People aren't ready for the truth" -- invoking Jesus Christ, who I doubt was talking about vaccines and certainly would not be in favor of these products that damage God's beautiful divine design.
Truth should never be hidden. Or, can you tell me, Lynn, when people will be ready for the truth?
That is another weak justification, while millions of children are being irreparably harmed in the meantime.
For those who believe that RFK Jr is "just saying he wants more testing, but doesn't believe it," I ask you to answer these questions:
Exactly how many innocent children need to be harmed in his call for "safety testing" (as if those two words can go together) before it's concluded that poison can never be made safe?
And how many millions/billions from our tax dollars will go to these vaccine manufacturers in the meantime?
Instead of calling for more "safety testing" on these childhood vaccines, the message needs to be "Stop the Shots!" Now that is a message I can get behind, how about you?
Posted by: Peggy Hall | September 12, 2024 at 10:32 PM
Gary- Thank you for posting the numbers. Important to go even further back...
The first studies of the prevalence of autism, which were conducted in the 1960s and 1970s in Europe and the United States, reported prevalence estimates in the range of 2 to 4 cases per 10,000 children (Lotter, 1966; Rutter, 2005; Treffert, 1970).
By 2002, estimates of the prevalence of autism in the United States were in the range of 6 to 7 per 1,000 children, more than a 30-fold increase from the first studies of autism prevalence (Fombonne, 2009; Lotter, 1966; Rice et al., 2007; Treffert, 1970).
cited from Committee to Evaluate the Supplemental Security Income Disability Program for Children with Mental Disorders; Board on the Health of Select Populations; Board on Children, Youth, and Families; Institute of Medicine; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Boat TF, Wu JT, editors. Mental Disorders and Disabilities Among Low-Income Children. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2015 Oct 28. 14, Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorder.
I've seen data that shows rates of 1 in 25,000 children in the 1950's but can't cite the source at the moment.
Not a natural trend. Terrifying. Maddening.
Posted by: sarah i | September 08, 2024 at 08:01 PM
Gayle & Benedetta, Thank you for your prayers. His name is Timothy. :)
Posted by: lorim | September 08, 2024 at 01:59 PM
You are very welcome Lorim and I will continue to keep your son in my prayers forever. I also wish my son would stop hurting himself when he has a nightmare. God Bless them and keep them safe.
Posted by: Gayle | September 06, 2024 at 09:35 AM
Thank you so much, Gayle & Benedetta. We need prayers and encouragement. He is precious. I just wish he would stop hurting himself.
Posted by: lorim | September 05, 2024 at 05:46 PM
Our gut biome is key to our health...
Must see interview with gut biome expert Dr. Hazan:
Dr. Hazan on Ivermectin, COVID, and MRNA Vaccines.
"Dr. Sabine Hazan recently testified in front of Congress about the suppression and censorship of her research on COVID-19 treatments such as Ivermectin, and vitamin protocols which included D, C, and Zinc. She details her struggles with getting research approved and published, shedding light on the broader issues of scientific integrity and transparency within the medical community. Dr. Hazan emphasized the undue influence of pharmaceutical interests on regulatory processes and the challenges this poses to unbiased, independent research. She advocates for reforms that support scientific freedom and ensures that public health decisions are informed by thorough, impartial scientific inquiry.
Dr. Sabine Hazan is a pioneer in the fields of gastroenterology and microbiome research. She has been doing clinical trials for drug companies over thirty years while also running an extremely successful medical practice."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jwqLlwXl-RQ
Posted by: Emmaphiladelphia | September 05, 2024 at 12:39 PM
Well stated, Laura.
It always comes down to the lesser of two evils, or stay home, don't vote, and risk the perceived worse candidate winning.
Which will we choose?
Posted by: Emmaphiladelphia | September 05, 2024 at 12:27 PM
Thank you, Kim, for running this article of Peggy Hall’s. It takes me back to a 2015 article of mine (link below), in which I asked Mr. Kennedy 3 questions, which he never answered publicly. The questions are extremely basic for any person who values bodily autonomy, individual and parental rights, healthcare and medical choice freedom, limitations on government power, and accountability and liability for those who manufacture and administer vaccines. My article was written nearly 9 years ago, and at that time, Kennedy had been speaking out about the mercury in vaccines for about a decade.
So, we are talking roughly 20 years for Kennedy to arrive at the point where he publicly and unequivocally states at every opportunity that he is vehemently opposed to vaccine mandates, fiercely in favor of individual and parental rights to make any and all healthcare/medical decisions, minus any government interference, coercion, cost, or penalty, and strongly supportive of repealing the 1986 NCVIA, immediately restoring liability for vaccine-induced injuries and deaths to their rightful owners, specifically, to those who manufacture and administer vaccines.
How long are people willing to wait for those who have the public speaking platform in our movement to say what needs to be said? How many more children must be sacrificed and have their health, development, independence, fertility, and longevity decimated?
Did you read lorim’s comment below? How many children and parents are living similarly-devastated lives, due to “routine” childhood vaccinations, which are mandated/required in most places for daycare, school, government assistance, foster care, adoption, summer programs, camps, missions trips, and now, post-secondary education? Why hasn’t this Vaccine Holocaust been stopped in its tracks? Why would anyone in the know not speak out boldly and strongly at every opportunity, proclaiming that not only must the vaccine mandates be immediately and forever eliminated, but an immediate moratorium must be placed on each and every vaccine, as not one has ever been tested or approved properly or ethically, either individually, or in the myriad haphazard combinations in which they are routinely administered, and the evidence of the devastation they are causing is massive and undeniable? Why is this so difficult for the adults in this world to take these urgently-needed, decades-overdue positions and actions?
When someone clearly tells you, time and again, that they are not anti-vaccine, but rather, fiercely pro-vaccine, believe them. When someone does not steadfastly proclaim the importance and necessity of unfettered individual and parental rights with regard to healthcare and medical decision making, but instead talks about cleaning up, fixing, and rebuilding trust in government agencies, understand who it is they think should have healthcare and medical decision making power. When someone does not repeatedly talk about repealing a certain Act, understand that it may be because they support it. When someone is now focusing on our toxic food supply as the driver of chronic health issues, while not also specifically mentioning, and highlighting, the catastrophic effects of the scores of toxic vaccines American children are given, now beginning in the womb, and continued within hours of being born, and then at regular and frequent intervals throughout infancy, toddlerhood, childhood, and the teen years, ask yourself what you think that signifies about his future priorities if put into a position of power.
When someone won’t answer the 3 basic questions I posed to him, as stated in the article below, ask yourself why.
https://www.ageofautism.com/2015/11/i-respectfully-ask-mr-kennedy-and-all-americans-these-questions.html
*Please note the additional info at the end of the article, after my bio.
Posted by: Laura Hayes | September 05, 2024 at 10:50 AM
Benedetta, thank you so much for promising to keep us in your prayers forever more and I will do the same for you too. God Bless You!
Posted by: Gayle | September 05, 2024 at 10:14 AM
lorim and Gayle you just so pulled at my heart. Hugs to you both, Hugs to you Iorim.
You both will be in my prayers forever more.
Posted by: Benedetta | September 05, 2024 at 09:09 AM
Lorim-I have an adult son with autism and epilepsy who has had many grand mal seizures that are now controlled with medication. We also have had MANY, MANY difficult and distressing days with him over the years and our life has been just a series of struggles to keep ourselves going day after day. I would not wish this condition on anyone and I think it is one of the worst things that can happen to any family especially the person affected. Please know that you are not alone as I know many people with similar stories to ours and I just hope and pray that researchers at the pharmaceutical companies discover a cure for our tragically affected children/adults.
Posted by: Gayle | September 05, 2024 at 08:33 AM
I believe Kennedy is informed on this topic very well. This is an article is from his website.
AUGUST 21, 2020 Autism—The Most Glaring Aspect of the Deterioration of Health Among Our Kids?
The numbers: We’ve watched the numbers explode with no end in sight. Over the last 20 years the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have routinely updated the autism rate: 2001: one in 250
2004: one in 166
2007: one in 150
2009: one in 110
2012: one in 88
2014: one in 68
2018: one in 59
2020: one in 54
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/autism-the-most-glaring-aspect-of-the-deterioration-of-health-among-our-kids/
Posted by: Gary Brown | September 04, 2024 at 08:33 PM
A little off topic, but our son is having another difficult day. What should I celebrate about autism? Should I celebrate that he wants to cling to me or my husband all day and night long? Should I celebrate that he does self injury to himself so consistently? Should I celebrate that he's had so many allergies? Should I celebrate that his diet has to be so special to keep him from hurting himself but even that no longer works? Should I celebrate he has to be on medicine to try to sedate him? Should I celebrate that he cries when he hurts himself? Should I celebrate that he is very low verbal, lower verbal than a child with only Down's Syndrome? Should I celebrate that he seems to have a chronic encephalitis? Should I celebrate that even though he was born normal, the toxic injections helped him achieve this wonderful celebration of autism? Should I celebrate that while our days are challenging, the elites who love population control and didn't vaccinate their own children, push these toxic injections on our children? Our son is NOT autism. Just like a child with cancer is NOT cancer; also caused by toxic injections. I will NOT celebrate that a child has cancer and I will NOT celebrate that our son has autism. We will celebrate our son, NOT his injury. His injury makes me want to cry on the difficult days, and there are many difficult days.
Posted by: lorim | September 04, 2024 at 05:51 PM
Who to vote for?
Just ask Alexa:
WATCH: Whom does Alexa recommend you vote for? You may be shocked at the response
https://www.wnd.com/2024/09/watch-whom-does-alexa-recommend-you-vote-for-it-depends-if-you-ask-about-trump-or-harris/
Posted by: Emmaphiladelphia | September 04, 2024 at 01:10 PM
Excellent questions by Peggy Hall.
We won't know who the candidates really are until after September 18......
"Prosecutors from the Manhattan district attorney's office said Monday that they will defer to the judge on former President Donald Trump's bid to delay his sentencing on falsifying business records charges until after the election.
The sentencing hearing is scheduled for Sept. 18 — two days after New York state Judge Juan Merchan is expected to rule on Trump's motion to toss out his conviction in May in light of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision on presidential immunity in a different case."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/prosecutors-trump-sentencing-delay-hush-money-election-rcna166813
Posted by: Emmaphiladelphia | September 04, 2024 at 12:43 PM
RFK Jr has spoken often about policy changes he would do on day one if elected.
I think Tulsi Gabbard is of much more concern in terms of policy, as I am unaware of her ever endorsing medical freedoms and vaccine choice, especially as a WEF young global leader.
I do recall her 'refusing' the vax until all the elders 'had a chance at it', which seemed shallow, given the experimental nature of the product, and policies in ny and ca of putting covid patients in nursing homes.
Posted by: greyone | September 04, 2024 at 09:07 AM
I stopped listening to Peggy Hall after I watched a video not long ago where she distorted the truth about a subject I knew something about personally. She's an extremist, which is great for moralizing but dangerous to getting things done. She expects RFK to declare truths the American public is not ready to hear. Even Jesus said to his disciples, "I have many things to tell you but you can't bear it right now." At this point Peggy is destructive, because she's injecting doubt into people's minds and potentially giving them a reason not to support this team, the best hope ever of addressing the devastation to our children. Please support RFK and Trump. RFK would never have endorsed Trump if he wasn't convinced Trump would follow through.
Posted by: Lynn Barton | September 04, 2024 at 09:06 AM
Thank you for sharing that. I agree with all that you said in your introduction. The candidates should be asked those questions. I don't think Kennedy and his speech writers could have packed any more information into a 48 minute campaign suspension speech. However, if Ms. Hall is ever given the opportunity to get the answers to those questions, it would be "Must See TV".
Posted by: Lisa M Adams | September 04, 2024 at 08:53 AM