Informed Consent Action Network Scores Win for University of California Students
We invite you subscribe to the ICAN (Informed Considet Action Network) newsletter to learn about their work. Look at this glorious win for medical freedom. Laws are tools. Useful. They create civilized society and fix problems. Everyone has a hammer in the toolbox. But a hammer can also be a nifty weapon for bashing in heads. I suppose we could call that an "off label use." So too can laws be used to punish, block, subjugate, and worse.
###
BREAKING NEWS: University of California Allows Religious Exemptions on the Heels of Two Successful ICAN-Backed Lawsuits
ICAN’s attorneys recently scored major wins in lawsuits brought against both UC Davis and UCLA for the UC system’s refusal to grant religious exemptions to students. As a result, the entire University of California (UC) school system has changed its vaccination policy to permit religious exemptions for all 295,000+ of its students!
In January and February 2024, ICAN’s attorneys—led by Aaron Siri, who also happens to be an alumnus of UC Berkeley Law School—filed two successful lawsuits on behalf of students at University of California, Davis (UC Davis) and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA).
The lawsuits alleged the schools violated the First Amendment by providing a process for students to obtain a secular (medical) exemption but not a religious exemption to the school’s vaccine policy.
In the UC Davis case, the school was going to expel an online student who had already attended two of the four required in-person days, unless she took various vaccines against her religious beliefs.
In the UCLA case, the school was going to expel a graduate student after she already attended classes on campus for two semesters without the required vaccines—who was also an employee of the school, working on the campus—unless she received various vaccines against her religious beliefs.
Both cases settled after a California court entered a temporary restraining order mandating UC to allow one of the students to register, holding: “There is nothing in the record to suggest the religious exemption sought here poses a greater risk to [UC] Davis’s interests than the secular exemptions it already allows.”
On the heels of that win, ICAN’s attorneys threatened to bring more of these cases.
Now, ICAN is pleased to announce that, as of July 23, 2024, the University of California has changed its vaccination policy (applicable to all 295,000+ UC students) to add a religious exemption:
Read more HERE.
###Get to know The Real Anthony Fauci in this #1 best seller from Skyhorse Publishing.
Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health
Anthony Fauci seems to have not considered that his unprecedented quarantine of the healthy would kill far more people than COVID, obliterate the global economy, plunge millions into poverty and bankruptcy, and grievously wound constitutional democracy globally.
This is a great victory.
However, I wonder how the school will determine if the individual has religious grounds to object. During Covid, my husband was working from home but the HR person wanted all Covid jabbed. We live in a religious exempt state, so they had to mention that they could use that if they did not get jabbed. When my husband claimed it, they demanded proof. Thankfully, because of my ongoing research on all things vaccine, I could quickly access a Newsweek article stating that the Covid vax did indeed use aborted fetal cells in the research to develop the jabs. They accepted this and he avoided the jab; however, he was required to wear a mask if he came into the office. Beware of what hoops the school might make students jump through to get the religious exemption.
Posted by: Emmaphiladelphia | September 23, 2024 at 11:52 AM
wonderful, and in California!
Posted by: greyone | September 23, 2024 at 07:48 AM
Great news! Thanks for letting us know, Kim.
Reminds me of an article I wrote after CA introduced (and easily passed) SB276. Below is an excerpt from, and also the link to, my brief article.
“Why should children who have serious/certain medical conditions, as designated by the CDC, be more protected from vaccine harm than healthy children, or than children with “less serious”/non-designated medical conditions?
This is blatant discrimination, and it is wrong. In truth, no child should be injected with the toxic, neurotoxic, poisonous, carcinogenic, immune-and-nervous-system-destroying, GI-damaging, fertility impairing/sterilizing, mutagenic ingredients in vaccines.
In these tyrannical times, immediate legal action is urgently needed to make “healthy and non-CDC-designated sick children” a legally protected class.“
https://www.ageofautism.com/2019/04/discrimination-against-the-healthy-and-less-sick.html
Posted by: Laura Hayes | September 23, 2024 at 07:33 AM