I recently posted 15 stories on Loss of Brain Trust from over three days, July 10th to 12th, and all were about places becoming “sensory friendly” and “neurodiverse.”
They were cheery pieces from the U.S., Ireland, the U.K., about a restaurant, a library, a water park, a hospital, a summer camp, a store and lots of other places, ALL providing accommodations for autism and the other neurological conditions kids are living with today. Everyone was extremely happy about it.
It’s clear; autism is no longer seen as a disability. Kids with autism are just differently-abled and we need to provide for them. Then everything will be fine.
That’s the message
All I could think, seeing these stories, was that there is a master plan here.
IMAGINE that you produced a medical product that was universally accepted as beneficial AND essential, but this product also had serious, pervasive side effects, including one that was highly visible.
WHAT would you do, especially if you didn’t want there to be widespread recognition of the damage?
HOW would you continue marketing the product and keep the profits coming while downplaying the injury?
FIRST OF ALL, you’d get total control of the narrative.
You would ingrain the benefits of this product into the general population: It saves lives and is absolutely safe.
ANYONE disparaging your product would be attacked as dangerous. There must be no dissent.
SECOND, you would have to disprove the damage that resulted from your product. That could be done by using the media to promote phony studies testifying to product safety. The media could also be helpful in discrediting any naysayers.
THIRD, you would have to rationalize product side effects as something else. You could claim the injuries were nothing new, professionals were simply better at noticing them.
FOURTH, you would downplay the damage as merely mild differences from typical people. You could do this by highlighting the resulting condition as something to celebrate. Perhaps even have a whole month dedicated to the damage. An easily recognized emblem could make people feel that we all care about those who have this condition.
FINALLY, you would do everything possible to make people with this injury feel a part of society. NORMALIZE IT! Special accommodations would have to be universally promoted and rewarded.
VOILA! LOOK AT THE 15 STORIES I POSTED!
We are there! AUTISM IS A FACT OF LIFE. It’s now NEURODIVERSITY!
I think back over the past 25 years and ALL the autism groups I’ve been connected with locally. I’ve known many very desperate parents whose children were not getting help at school and didn’t qualify for health insurance coverage. I have no idea where most of those kids ended up, but throughout it all, I never heard parents demand answers. Mostly they were begging for help, sometimes in tears.
How did my child get autism? How come I didn’t know anyone with autism when I was growing up? Those are questions I did not hear anyone ask.
I remember one mom figured that autism was always out there, we just didn’t see it. She told me, “They used to keep these kids at home.”
Being a teacher, I heard others say things like, “These kids come with so many issues from home,” as if autism was still seen the effect of bad parenting.
WHEN health officials, doctors, news reporters ALL tell parents that this condition is genetic, nothing can prevent it, just live with it— most people do.
The corporate interests that control what we’re told are not troubled by the monumental changes autism is responsible for.
And it’s only going to continue.
Earlier this year, on March 23rd the upgrade in the autism rate to one in 36 children was announced. https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2023/p0323-autism.html#:~:text=One%20in%2036%20(2.8%25),1%20in%2044%20(2.3%25).
There was merely a press release from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that was picked up by a handful of news outlets.
I did not see any official on camera once again declaring the new numbers. There was no press conference. It seems it wasn’t that big a deal.
Whenever there’s a new rate, it’s always attributed to better diagnosing, broader definition, greater awareness. ALWAYS!
AND we’re all conditioned to see this rate, like all the past announcements, to be temporary.
Everyone fully expects one in 30 or one in 25 by next year or the year after.
I did notice that CBS News Philadelphia cited someone from Atlanta in their brief news story.
"A lot of the increase is likely due to changes in practice, improvements in early detection, availability of services," CDC's child development and disability branch chief Matt Maenner said.
Reporter Stephanie Stahl, who wrote the piece, seemed to attribute to increase from one in 44 kids to one in 36 to finding more autism among minority students.
She wrote, “For the first time, autism is being diagnosed more frequently in Black and Hispanic children than in White kids according to a new report released Thursday from the CDC.”
What Stahl did not do was to ask Matt Maenner right out, “WHEN WILL THESE INCREASES FINALLY STOP?”
“IF THIS IS THE RESULT OF ‘IMPROVEMENTS IN EARLY DETECTION,’ WHEN WILL DOCTORS FINALLY GET IT RIGHT?”
“SHOULD WE JUST EXPECT MORE AND MORE AND MORE AUTISM WITH NO REASONABLE EXPLANATION?”
That’s what I would ask. That makes sense.
THIS IS INSANE!
How can any rational person continue to accept this nonsense?###
Order today, from Skyhorse Publishing.
The Wuhan Cover-Up pulls back the curtain on how the US government's increase in biosecurity spending after the 2001 terror attacks—facilitated by Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)—set in motion a plan to transform the NIAID into a de facto Defense Department agency.
While Dr. Fauci zealously funded and pursued gain-of-function research, concern grew among some scientists and government officials about the potential for accidental or deliberate release of weaponized viruses from labs that might trigger worldwide pandemics. A moratorium was placed on this research, but true to form, Dr. Fauci found ways to continue unperturbed—outsourcing some of the most controversial experiments offshore to China and providing federal funding to Wuhan Institute of Virology's (WIV's) leading researchers for gain-of-function studies in partnership with the Chinese military and the Chinese Communist Party.
Vax-Unvax: Let the Science Speak (Children’s Health Defense) Hardcover – Illustrated, August 15, 2023 by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (Author), Brian Hooker (Author)
Based on over one hundred studies in the peer-reviewed literature that consider vaccinated versus unvaccinated populations. Each of these studies is analyzed and put in context of the difference in health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated infants, children, and adults. Given the massive push to vaccinate the entire global population, this book is timely and necessary for individuals to make informed choices for themselves and their families.