New CDC autism rate recently released:
In 2021, the CDC told us that 1 in every 44 eight-year-olds had an autism diagnosis. The new 2023 CDC data tells us that 1 in every 36 eight-year-olds in the U.S. now has an autism diagnosis (2.8%). They express no alarm and don’t characterize the increase in the rate of autism as a crisis. The CDC pretends to have no clue what could be causing so many children to become autistic. They appear to believe that having one autistic child for every thirty-six children is totally normal. It is important to realize that the CDC is firmly on the side of big pharma and the vaccine companies. They protect and promote the vaccine industry. The CDC is hiding evidence that vaccines are the main cause of autism.
Toby Rogers on the CDC’s new Autism numbers:
Head over to tobyrogers.substack.com UTobian for a deeper dive into the new autism rate. Scroll down to “Newly released autism prevalence estimates show that the iatrogenicide is expanding.” He explains how these numbers are collected and averaged from several areas of the country. Rogers also points out that boys are 3.8 times more likely to have autism than girls. Here is an interesting quote from that article: “Every f*cking Democrat in California swore that vaccines were not linked to autism. They mandated one of the most extreme childhood vaccine schedules in the world for kids to go to school, and voila, 6.94% of boys in the state now have autism.”
For those who want to read the science which implicates vaccines as the main cause of autism:
Go to www.howdovaccinescauseautism.org. This website presents evidence from 212 scientific studies. Don’t be intimidated by the scientific language. The abstracts are intentionally written to be understandable to nonscientists. Enjoy.
What was the rate of autism in 1970?
Dr. Darnold Treffert and colleagues published a study in the 1970 Archives of General Psychiatry on the rate of autism in Wisconsin. They found the autism rate to be 0.7 children per 10,000. That means Less than one autistic child for every 10,000 children. That was long before the 1986 law which exempts vaccine companies from liability for injuries and deaths caused by vaccines. Soon after that law was passed, the number of vaccines on the CDC schedule increased rapidly. It was like a gold rush. Producing vaccines became much more profitable without all those pesky lawsuits where the vaccine companies were forced to pay out serious money for injuries and deaths caused by vaccines.
What is the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD)?
The vaccine records and other health data of more than nine million Americans make up the VSD. Nine large Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) have been contributing this information since 1990. It is a great database that could be used to answer difficult questions concerning vaccine safety and the overall health of children. Unfortunately, this is not being done as you will see below.
Independent scientists are denied access to the VSD.
In the book Turtles All the Way Down (a truly great book on vaccines) on page 124, the authors make this clear: “The CDC’s Vaccine Safety Office manages the VSD system. It is inaccessible to outside researchers, healthcare professionals, and the general public. Researchers who wish to analyze VSD data must submit a formal request to the CDC detailing their research proposal and intentions. Only CDC-approved researchers gain access to the system …Thus, data on the true magnitude of vaccine adverse events can continue to be concealed from the public indefinitely.” Imagine what will happen when independent researchers are allowed to access the VSD system.
Are there enough unvaccinated children in the VSD to conduct a vaccinated versus unvaccinated autism study?
In the Turtles book on page 222, the authors address this issue: “…The IOM [Institute of Medicine] 2013 report mentions at least one information system (VSD) that has a large enough proportion of unvaccinated children to investigate differences in health outcomes of vaccinated and unvaccinated children.” So yes, this study can easily be done using VSD data. It would be a retrospective study comparing thousands of fully vaccinated children with thousands of unvaccinated children to determine the rate of autism in each group. What do you think that study would tell us?
When Kennedy met with Trump:
After he was elected and before he took office, Trump asked RFK Jr to meet with him at Trump Tower. It was a two-hour meeting about vaccine safety. The possibility of forming a Vaccine Safety Commission to be chaired by Kennedy was discussed. Kennedy told Trump that the main action needed to get to the truth about vaccine safety was to open the VSD to independent researchers. It was a tragically missed opportunity. The Vaccine Safety Commission was not formed and the VSD system is still closed to independent researchers.
Kennedy is now running for president.
RFK Jr put out the following statement when he announced that he is running for president: “After carefully reviewing the science, it is clear to me that vaccines and other toxic environmental exposures are inextricably linked to rising rates of autism, allergies, autoimmune disorders and a host of other conditions.”
My prediction for an autism study using VSD data:
When a vaccinated versus unvaccinated autism study gets done, I predict that the rate of autism in vaccinated children will be in line with the CDC’s recently released rate (one in every 36 children) or even worse. I predict that the rate of autism in unvaccinated children will be 1 in 5,000 or more. Yes, that would be a huge difference. That is what is being hidden. We won’t know the truth until such a study is done. The CDC will do whatever it takes to prevent this study from being done. This is an unacceptable stalemate. How long can this evidence be suppressed? The top-level doctors and scientists at the CDC are deliberately hiding the truth about vaccines and autism. The carnage continues.
Let’s assume that this study gets done and it clearly shows that vaccines are the main cause of autism. What then?
We would need to do additional studies to determine which vaccines and which ingredients in the vaccines are causing autism. We would also look at other conditions that are suspected of being caused by vaccines. These include autoimmune diseases, seizures, ADHD (attention deficit hyperactive disorder), asthma, learning disabilities, speech delay, type one diabetes, sudden infant deaths, and more. Imagine the impact these studies would have on the vaccine industry. The idea is to honestly and objectively investigate the safety of vaccines. This is not being done.
A vaccinated versus unvaccinated autism study has most likely been done internally then buried because it doesn’t fit the CDC/big pharma narrative.
If such a study showed that vaccines don’t cause autism, the results would be front page news and the lead story on the nightly news. The fact that this study has not been done (or at least has not been published) is suspicious and incriminating. The Turtles book 0n page 198 explains about pharma’s favorite type of vaccine studies: “Epidemiological studies are the tool of choice for health authorities and pharma companies to maintain a façade of vaccine safety science. They are cheap, relatively simple to conduct, and above all, their results are easily manipulated.” I know it is difficult for good and honest people to believe that high ranking officials are deliberately concealing information that is so important to the health of our children. How do they rationalize the evil they are doing?
When the CDC learned some lessons:
In 1999, Belgian epidemiologist Thomas Verstraeten used VSD data to compare health outcomes of hundreds of thousands of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. The children who got the thimerosal [mercury]-containing hepatitis B vaccines had more than 11 times the rate of autism compared to children who did not get those vaccines. The vaccinated children also had much higher rates of ADHD, speech delay, tics, and sleep disorders. The details of this study were presented at a conference, but the study was never published. The information on the Verstraeten study can be found on page 327 of The Real Anthony Fauci by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. What did the CDC learn from this? They learned not to allow vaccinated versus unvaccinated studies to be done on VSD data. They also learned not to let the details of negative studies ever see the light of day. It should now be obvious why the CDC allows only trusted insider researchers access to the VSD system. It is sad that more people can’t see through the “vaccines are safe and effective” scam. Controlling access to the VSD is part of the scam. Control of mainstream media by pharma is another part of the scam. The battle for hearts and minds on this issue is ongoing and the current winners are big pharma and the vaccine companies. The current losers are the American people, especially children.
Will children die in huge numbers from vaccine preventable diseases if they don’t get vaccines?
This is another area where the VSD data could provide valuable information. A vaccinated versus unvaccinated study comparing mortality rates and overall health outcomes would answer this question. I believe such a study would show that unvaccinated children are far healthier than vaccinated children. Vaccines played a minor role in the decrease in infectious disease mortality in the early to mid-1900s. Advances in sanitation and hygiene and improvements in nutrition were the main reasons that infectious disease mortality decreased to near zero BEFORE most of the vaccines were introduced. The CDC and vaccine companies claim that vaccines saved us all from massive infectious disease mortality. That claim is widely promoted and widely believed but is not true.
The Amish reveal the truth about vaccines.
There are more than 200,000 Amish children in the U.S. The vast majority of them are unvaccinated. Autism is rare and infectious disease mortality is very low in Amish communities. Why is this reality ignored? The health of Amish children must be ignored because it demonstrates that unvaccinated children can be robustly healthy. Why is autism rare in Amish children? Because most Amish children don’t get vaccines. It is that clear and simple.
We have lots of questions about vaccine safety.
Imagine that you have questions, and you know of a source that has the answers. The Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) is that source, but you are not allowed access to it. The CDC’s hand-picked researchers are allowed to access that source and they are happy to tell us what it says. The problem is that they are not being truthful about what the VSD data tells us, and the CDC is refusing to allow the vaccinated versus unvaccinated studies that would reveal the truth. If pharma and the CDC are allowed to continue blocking access to the VSD system, nothing will change. They will control the narrative and the health of Americans young and old will continue to suffer.
If you have made it this far, allow me to share with you part of my morning prayers:
In addition to praying for my wife and our children and grandchildren, I pray for all those hurt and killed by vaccines and their families. I pray especially for all the autistic children and young adults who were vaccinated into autism. Their parents struggle mightily to care for them, and they fear that no one will be there to care for their autistic children when they are gone. I also pray for those hurt and killed by Covid vaccines (that is another big story where the truth is being hidden.) I then pray for all the wonderful people who are exposing the great harm being done by vaccines. God bless them. I pray for many of those people by name. Please join me in these prayers. Isaiah 48:22 tells us “There is no peace, says the Lord, for the wicked.” The ability to rationalize evil behavior is strong, but that doesn’t excuse it or make it right.
Follow the money.
Vaccine companies are making an enormous amount money and they are not liable for injuries and deaths caused by their products. What a great business model! The people who are exposing the great harm being caused by vaccines are not making money. They are trying to help prevent these types of injuries and deaths in the future. They also experience constant ridicule and abuse for their efforts. Greed is a powerful force.
About the author: Dr. William H. Gaunt is a retired Doctor of Naturopathic Medicine. He is a graduate of the University of South Florida in Tampa. He was a U.S. Navy helicopter pilot and later an instructor pilot for the Iranian Navy and the Saudi Arabian Air Force before attending medical school at Bastyr University near Seattle, Washington. Dr. Gaunt graduated with honors in 1983. He has also taught chemistry, biology, and anatomy at high school and college levels and published several articles related to vaccines. Dr. Gaunt and his wife have a blended family of 8 boys plus a girl adopted from China.
By Wayne Rohde
The Vaccine Court looks at the mysterious and often unknown world of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP), the only recourse for seeking compensation for those who have been injured by a vaccine. The NVICP, better known as the ”Vaccine Court,” however, is not without controversy.
Established by Congress as a direct result of the passage of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, the NVICP was supposed to offer a no-fault alternative to the traditional injury claims filed in state or federal courts and was to provide quick, efficient, and fair compensation for those who have been injured by vaccines. The reality, however, is that many cases take several years or longer to complete and require tremendous commitment from families already pushed to the brink of bankruptcy caring for the vaccine-injured family member, only to discover that the end result is manipulated by the government in defense of the US vaccine policy.
A Letter to Liberals: Censorship and COVID: An Attack on Science and American Ideals
By Robert Kennedy Jr.
A leading Democrat challenges his party to return to liberal values and evidence-based science
Democrats were the party of intellectual curiosity, critical thinking, and faith in scientific and liberal empiricism. They once took pride in understanding how to read science critically, exercising healthy skepticism toward notoriously corrupt entities like the drug companies that brought us the opioid crisis, and were outraged by the phenomenon of “agency capture” and the pervasive control of private interests over Congress, the media, and the scientific journals.
A Letter to Liberals is Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s, challenge to “lockdown liberalism’s” embrace of policies that are an affront to once cherished precepts.
Denial: How Refusing to Face the Facts about Our Autism Epidemic Hurts Children, Families, and Our Future
By Mark Blaxill and Dan Olmsted
Even as the autism rate soars and the cost to our nation climbs well into the billions, a dangerous new idea is taking hold: There simply is no autism epidemic.
The question is stark: Is autism ancient, a genetic variation that demands acceptance and celebration? Or is it new and disabling, triggered by something in the environment that is damaging more children every day?