From the start of the outbreak, it was hard to ignore the possibility that the virus had been bioengineered in a lab, because Bill Gates and Tony Fauci had been warning of a coronavirus pandemic for years, and even staged the notorious "Event 201" to plan for it just 2 months before the first recorded case, to say nothing of the fact that the actual outbreak we're now living through corresponded almost too precisely to the scenario they had projected. Soon the preponderance of asymptomatic cases made it seem quite likely that the outbreak had actually begun a few months earlier, in which case both Gates and Fauci might well have known about it. Nor was it in the least implausible to imagine that they were already at work by then designing the Moderna vaccine in which they were both heavily invested.
To be sure, these are all conspiracy speculations. What we do know is that the CDC waited for two months without testing to locate and isolate asymptomatic cases, so that lockdown came to seem necessary to "flatten the curve," even though it would inevitably prolong the outbreak, and that it has continued to oppose and impede antiviral treatments that have nevertheless proved to be effective. So again it is difficult to avoid the inference that they had committed themselves to the vaccine strategy from the start, especially since flattening the curve made natural herd immunity impossible, so that a universal vaccine mandate could be presented as the only practical solution.
But to my mind the most compelling evidence that the virus was manufactured lies in the highly unusual nature of the COVID illness that has resulted from it. Polio, measles, mumps, rubella, influenza, chickenpox, shingles, rotavirus, and other viral illnesses that we vaccinate against all follow an acute pattern, with high fever and a distinctive clinical picture that is easily recognizable in most cases and then burns itself out in a few weeks, with the important end result of expelling the virus from the body.
The COVID-19 illness deviates from this pattern in several key respects. First, it exhibits a clear preponderance of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic cases who are not sick at all or require little or no medical attention. Second, it narrowly targets certain specific enzymes and correlated physiological functions in many different organs and tissues, and thus produces a wide variety of symptom-pictures corresponding to them. Third, it selectively targets, harms, and kills those already afflicted with chronic disease, especially the elderly, but also young people with pre-existing conditions, either latent or manifest.
These unusual characteristics are precisely similar to what I witnessed over and over again in my 50+ years of clinical experience caring for vaccinated children. Here's a clear example: a girl of 18 going to college. Plagued by bedwetting and OCD symptoms in elementary school, she recovered beautifully with homeopathic treatment and remained essentially symptom-free for over 10 years. Her college insisted on an MMR booster for admission, and within a week her old symptoms returned with a vengeance. But it could just as well have been ear infections, asthma, allergies, ADHD, autism, or any other chronic disease: once they became well for several months or more and no longer needed further treatment, they would invariably suffer a dramatic relapse within a week or two of their next vaccinations. The effect was simply to aggravate whatever chronic diseases or tendencies were already present, whether exacerbating diseases that were active, or reactivating those that had receded, or precipitating those that were latent. It happened often enough to be the rule, not the exception, no matter what diseases they suffered from, or which vaccines were given.
In short, it seemed to be a minimum or baseline effect of all vaccines on everyone, of the vaccination process itself, indeed of the mechanism by which they accomplish whatever they're designed to accomplish, and thus no mere aberration, "side effect," or coincidence. Epidemiological research validated and strengthened these observations by demonstrating
1) that the risk of an adverse reaction had less to do with any particular vaccine than the total vaccine load, both given simultaneously at the same visit and accumulated over the patient's lifetime; and
2) that children who came down with and recovered from measles, mumps, rubella, chickenpox, and influenza were a lot less likely to develop chronic autoimmune diseases and cancer later in life than those merely vaccinated
When it turned out that most people dying with the COVID were elderly, in nursing homes, or at least with significant comorbidities, those experiences with vaccinated children inspired the realization that the SARS-CoV-2 virus seemed spookily vaccine-like in its effects, as well as unrecognizably different from the viruses I was familiar with, and thus confirmed my suspicion that it had been bioengineered in a laboratory for that purpose.
Parenthetically, it already seemed questionable that these complicated nursing home deaths were attributed unequivocally to the virus, rather than their comorbidities; but when the vaccine rollout began in early 2021, the true state of affairs became apparent when deaths occurring after vaccination were inconsistently written off to their comorbidities.
In any case, the vaccine-like behavior of the SARS-CoV-2 "virus," if such it be, may yet teach us something we urgently need to know, about how vaccines and these bioengineered particles that resemble them actually alter, distort, and counterfeit the natural immune response and produce the brave new world of chronic diseases that have long since become the order of the day.