With regard to the ACLU discussion below, more proof of their complete and utter uselessness when it comes to defending civil liberties. They are now on the side of the tyrants.

https://notthebee.com/article/the-aclu-is-suing-to-force-south-carolina-to-adopt-a-mask-mandate-making-it-unclear-why-the-aclu-even-exists-anymore

That book looks really good (but depressing), greyone. The audio clip is particularly chilling. I will say that the initial response from the FOIA officer (actually, from the FOIA clerk working on my request) was fairly quick--less than a day.

I can't tell how much government slowness is just laziness, and how much is deliberately obfuscatory. I recently filed a Right to Know request with a county I cover, and it took more than a month for the county to give me the information. A neighboring county, however, returned my first call within 24 hours, and then emailed me the data set. The data wasn't great news, but it was hardly shocking, and I have to think it was just foot-dragging by county employees who'd rather go out for coffee than give the public the information.

In the case of this FOIA request, the response email did include a statement about needing to consult with other agencies, but that strikes me as a BS justification for delay, because these agencies are working actively together on the "public health emergency." They discuss this information together all the time. I'm just asking for a copy of something they already have--something that is probably in their active files at present.

Government employees are often uncooperative with the media (and the public). The only way to do a good job is to set your jaw and keep at them, knowing that it will be an uphill battle, even in situations where there's nothing to hide. "Where does the strength come from, to see the race to its end? It comes from within." Sometimes I wish the salaried journalists at the major networks had greater tenacity. It would be harder for bureaucrats to blow off small-market reporters if they knew their delays would be subject to public airing on NBC or in WaPo.

I'm working my angle. I don't know if anyone here has connections in the black civil rights movement, but maybe the feds would take the request more seriously if it came in from a couple of directions. RNK is right. There is probably something to see here.

My FOIA request is being processed, and will exceed 30 working days (the statute calls for no more than 20 working days) to execute. Odd, because they prepared a report from those very records back in June.

IMPORTANT UPDATE

This is a detailed explanation of the statements made by Dr. Malone in this video:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vOTzGpZrFSb3/

"FDA Pfizer authorization (Comirnaty): Key points to consider and discuss.
These points are an aggregate of many minds, including Dr. Robert Malone., 23 Aug 2021

There are now TWO LEGALLY distinct (Pfizer vs. BionTech), but otherwise identical products, based on two FDA letters, as well as a press release. The analysis of these FDA products below is preliminary and subject to change."
The following is a link to the analysis with links to the actual documents:
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/550b0ac4e4b0c16cdea1b084/t/6124fdd27da16f3e2c51aecb/1629814226387/Key+points+to+consider+FDA+letters+and+press+release.pdf

@TOB

The largest Covid 19 unvaxxed population is African American. One would need to know the total vaxxed number of that group to get a better picture of adverse event frequency from VAERS.

More on the FDA "approval":
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/mainstream-media-fda-approval-pfizer-vaccine/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=62651064-d048-4c3f-8cf5-bbe1920c707e

TOB:
"As VAERS is passive, I doubt there is enough race data to do a robust analysis"

Depends what you're looking for. African-Americans are about 1/8 of the US population. They are experiencing about 1/8---1/7 of the US deaths attributed to COVID-19. If ~7,000 total US deaths have been reported in VAERS, then we would expect ~900 African-American deaths if they are race-proportional (would need to be adjusted for inoculation rate differences among races). If there is a major MMR-level deviation from the 900, it seems to me that would be readily observable. If we wanted to do some sort of stratification, that would make the problem more difficult. But, if such an effect were to exist, we should be able to see it from the overall data.

@Ronald N. Kostoff
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vOTzGpZrFSb3/

Thanks for the timely link. I was just researching this to see if the newly named "Comirnaty" FDA licensed shot was a legal "taxable vaccine" with ACIP and CDC "recommended" approval. OF COURSE IT ISN'T. Congress has to pass their already written bill (I saw it, but don't remember how to access it) which must be buried in the omnibus "infrastructure" train wreck of a bill that hasn't passed yet.

Then I noticed that the license was only for ages 16 and up. I was wondering why they kept saying that in spite of FDA approval, they would maintain their EUA status. I figured they kept the EUA status to legally offer under 16 year olds the jab and still have liability coverage. I still couldn't figure out how "Comirnaty" could have only FDA approval and still get liability coverage via EUA. When the mRNA inventor said that Comirnaty was a separate shot and was not yet available, IT ALL MADE SENSE.

THIS IS DECEPTIVE MARKETING. I was researching and calling elected officials about this and they initially said that the shot was now just like all the other "CDC recommended" shots on the childrens' school vax schedule. The shots they are now giving at their "school pop up clinics" ARE STILL EXPERIMENTAL.

To sum it up, the Pfizer shot named "Comirnaty" now has FDA approved Biologics License Application (BLA) for ages 16 and up. They must observe a high efficacy and safety profile for 6 months following the second dose. After this data is available, they will submit another BLA for ages 12-15. They also plan to seek a BLA for a "BOOSTER" DOSE. Planned failure?

Ref.
https://www.contractpharma.com/contents/view_breaking-news/2021-08-23/fda-approves-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-comirnaty/
https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/development-approval-process-cber/biologics-license-applications-bla-process-cber

According to the FDA, they also must investigate the manufacturing and facilities data.
This brings up a major problem for the mRNA based jabs. The substance (in this case a spike protein) that triggers an immune response, which they count on to "prevent Covid 19," IS NOT CONTAINED IN THE PHYSICAL SHOT. By design, EACH INDIVIDUAL'S BODY becomes the MANUFACTURER of the spike protein. According to current law, EACH INDIVIDUAL would have to be inspected to make sure their body produced the proper AMOUNT of spike protein which would trigger a safe and effective immune response. THEY HAVE NOT DONE THIS.

The NYT examined vaxx rates in NYC in different ethnic/racial groups. They found the following: "Only 28 percent of Black New Yorkers ages 18 to 44 are fully vaccinated; About 48 percent of Latino New Yorkers and 52 percent of white residents ages 18 to 44 are fully vaccinated."

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/13/nyregion/vaccination-rates-in-nyc-and-one-major-disparity.html

A number of vaxx mandates have been issued for NYC, including requiring proof of COVID vaccinations from employees and customers of indoor eateries, gyms and entertainment centers, and for various categories of workers as well. There are three obvious fallouts from this.

First, whether it was meant to be or not, the mandates discriminate to some extent against African-Americans, since they will be most impacted because of low vaxx rates. Second, they discriminate against many types of businesses, especially small businesses, that depend on high customer volumes. While I haven't been to NYC in recent years, my memory is that there were many eateries and similar establishments that survived on very high volumes of people at a few discrete time points during the day, lunch and sometimes breakfast most noticeably for the eateries. Cutting their volume in half spells a death knell for those businesses that have not been killed already. Many of these small businesses are minority-owned, and, again, whether it is meant to or not, these restrictions effectively discriminate against different minorities.

Third, and perhaps most insidious, is an issue I really haven't seen addressed anywhere. In 2014, Dr. William Thompson, a world-class epidemiologist working for the CDC, posted a statement on his lawyer's Website. He said that a CDC-conducted study in which he was a participant discarded data that would have shown roughly three times the risk for African-American children of Autism associated with the MMR vaccine compared to the rest of the population. These allegations were basically blacklisted by the media, never taken to Court, and never brought up at Congressional Hearings. As far as I know, they have never been disputed or proven.

Let's assume Thompson's allegations were true; I see no reasons they wouldn't be true other than a desire for self-destruction. If so, were these higher risks for African-American children an anomaly? Are they applicable only to the MMR vaccine and no other vaccine? More to the point, do these higher risks carry over to the COVID-19 inoculations? I have not been able to find racial stratification in the VAERS database, and VAERS experts I have talked to have not been able to find it as well. That's somewhat strange, since the population in CDC databases such as CDC Wonder is stratified racially, the number of COVID cases is stratified racially, the number of COVID deaths is stratified racially, the number of COVID inoculations is stratified racially, but for some strange reason, the COVID inoculation adverse events are not stratified racially. I have no idea whether there are racial differences in the COVID inoculation adverse events or not, but I would think it would be important to find out.

If some ethnic/racial groups are at higher risk of adverse events from the COVID inoculation, that would be useful information in adjusting their risk-benefit ratio. How do we get such information? I haven't seen such studies reported in the literature. Even if they do exist, and assuming they were funded by the CDC/FDA/NIH, would the numbers be any more credible than those that emerged from the final MMR vaccine-Autism study? Could the numbers be trusted? If there are disparities in adverse events from the COVID vaccines, and those at higher risk are not being informed, this would constitute another form of discrimination, whether or not that was the goal.

How do we resolve this?

RNK

Jesus, Take The Wheel

This apostate church enticed citizens to take the jab at their pop up clinic and rewarded them with a BBQ dinner coupon.....This mother of 3 took the bait:

Jessica Turner: 34-year-old Massachusetts woman has seizure while driving five days after first Pfizer mRNA injection (She live streamed the event on Twitter)
https://thecovidblog.com/2021/08/23/jessica-turner-34-year-old-massachusetts-woman-has-seizure-while-driving-five-days-after-first-pfizer-mrna-injection/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lydBPm2KRaU

We already have the truckers, Ms Hayes, we need the ACLU.

Thank you for all you do!

Anita Donnelly,

Unfortunately, the ACLU wouldn’t know a civil liberty if it bit them on the arse.

Californians learned this over the course of many years of healthcare/medical choice freedom and parental rights battles.

Corrupt cowards, like so many others.

Found this interesting:

https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/02/11/covid-19-triggers-wave-free-speech-abuse#

I think the ACLU should also get involved.

It is particularly alarming that FDA approved this product without calling on VRBPAC. No public hearing, no chance to hear actual vaccine and virus experts on the record, no roll call vote. I guess after Offit spoke out publicly against boosters, they didn't want to take the chance that he'd say something negative on a YouTube livestream about the Pfizer product.

Offit's rotavirus vaccine had upwards or 70,000 people in the trials, which went on for years. GSK's Rotarix had 63,000 people. Both vaccines targeted a population that was a tiny, tiny fraction of the 16-year-olds and up who are targeted by this Pfizer approval. VRBPAC gave a whole day to discussing Rotateq and another day to discussing Rotarix. ACIP took two whole months after the VRBPAC vote on Rotateq to add it to the recommended schedule. ACIP was already recommending the Pfizer product for kids 12 and up, months before it was approved.

Even by the crummy standards of vaccine approval that are responsible for the previously approved vaccines--standards that are insufficient to protect against somewhat rare adverse events or detect adverse events that take years to manifest--today's approval is an appalling joke.

"Specifically, in the FDA’s review for approval, the agency analyzed effectiveness data from approximately 20,000 vaccine and 20,000 placebo recipients ages 16 and older who did not have evidence of the COVID-19 virus infection within a week of receiving the second dose. The safety of Comirnaty was evaluated in approximately 22,000 people who received the vaccine and 22,000 people who received a placebo 16 years of age and older [...] More than half of the clinical trial participants were followed for safety outcomes for at least four months after the second dose. Overall, approximately 12,000 recipients have been followed for at least 6 months."

Four months... 12,000 people... thousands of unexplained deaths and adverse events in the unmonitored trial that is EUA... yes, by all means, let's extrapolate that to mean it's "safe and effective" for everyone old enough to drive. Good Lord.

A constant itch that goes on and on for decades, not just years.

As found by these researchers that the covid vaccine causes the immune system to over react to a fungi microbe that is really a back ground microbe that is safe and just crowds out other microbes.

This is pretty bad really.

The same study also found that the immune system is dampened down in taking care of tumor cells.

Hyper for a normal floral fungi and dampened down for cancer.

https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210510/Research-suggests-Pfizer-BioNTech-COVID-19-vaccine-reprograms-innate-immune-responses.aspx