Light Housekeeping and Lighthouse Keeping
A Polite Response to President Biden

Levi Quackenboss’ Gentle Approach to Helping Parents Learn About the CV For Their Kids

Spoonful of sugarUpdate: Facebook 30 day banned at least one person who posted this info yesterday.

BOSS not bush! I do it every time!! 

Levi Quackenboss  is known for his acerbic wit and sharp, educational blog posts. But below you'll see his softer side, as he takes the dump truck full of sugar approach to help a friend learn facts about the Covid vaccines and children. Parents don't get this information from their pediatricians, their news sources or most of their equally unaware friends.  We are so entrenched in the world of medical rights and vaccine injury and disability, that we often forget that the MAJORITY of those around us are not only brand new to the concepts, but have been actively educated to believe anything but what we share. There is a time to use lemon, and a time to use honey. And a hive full of facts. Levi is a Queen (King?) Bee for this work.


Hi, friend. I noticed your post the other day-- the one about making sure your child wears a mask until they can be vaccinated this fall--when the Pfizer COVID vaccine will be awarded emergency authorization for use in kids under 12. You know my stance on this specific issue, and of course, I know yours, but I hope this note finds you open and willing to receive some information before you finalize that monumental decision for your child. 

Mainstream media haven't reported much on the children and young adults harmed by these vaccines, so I understand that their stories may not have made it onto your radar. I'd like to tell you about a couple of them.

The first is a 12-year-old girl named Maddie de Garay. Maddie's parents allowed her and her two brothers to enroll in the Pfizer trial where 1,100 kids aged 12-15 received the real Pfizer COVID vaccine. One brother received a saline placebo. The other received the real vaccine and quickly became infected with a severe case of COVID, serious enough to cause him to miss many weeks of school. But Maddie's experience was different. Her body lost the ability to digest food and she also lost the ability to walk. While this happened back on January 20, 2021, she still uses a wheelchair and still has a feeding tube today. Her medical team declared her new health status to be a mental issue and suggested she be committed to a psychiatric hospital. Pfizer did not stop their trial and has not publicized this child's injuries. You can watch Maddie's mother, an engineer, testify at a US Senator's press conference here:

The next child is Jacob Clynick. Jacob was 13 years old when he received the second dose of the Pfizer vaccine on June 13, 2021. He died three days later of an enlarged heart and myocarditis, which is inflammation of the inner heart wall. The CDC says it's "investigating" Jacob's death. You can read about Jacob here:

Then there is Kamryn Thomas. She was 17 on March 19, 2021, when she took the Pfizer vaccine. She died 11 days later, having collapsed at home and was discovered by her family. You can read about Kamryn here:

While there are numerous 17-21 year old young men in the media who have nearly died of heart inflammation or blood clots in the brain after taking the vaccines, I'll give you the story of Simone Scott as my last example. Simone was a 19-year-old college student at Northwestern University when she took the Moderna vaccine on May 1, 2021. While her school was about to mandate vaccines, she was eager to get ahead of it and take it on her own. Eight days later her heart began to fail, setting off a grueling spiral of deteriorating health that resulted in a heart transplant. She died on May 16, 2021. The best reporting on Simone's passing was written by former New York Times writer Alex Berenson. You can read his work here:

On June 22, 2021, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) held a meeting where they discussed myocarditis after vaccination in adolescents, teens, and young adults. There were over 300 cases of post-vaccination myocarditis reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System which, at best, is capturing only 10-20% of very serious post-COVID vaccination reactions because parents don't know to report to the system and doctors are refusing to do it. The committee decided that the mRNA vaccines like Moderna and Pfizer would require an FDA warning on the fact sheet--a paper that very few people even read. The new warning states that there is a risk of heart inflammation for several days after the second dose and to seek medical help if the person experiences chest pain or a fluttering heart. No verbal warning is required for the young people receiving the vaccine and they do not need to be directed to read or specifically acknowledge the warning in writing.

A large portion of the ACIP meeting was dedicated to hammering home the committee's conclusion that, based on their math, the benefits of vaccinating young people under age 18 with mRNA outweigh the risks. Their conclusion was rooted in their assessment of COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths that the vaccine would allegedly prevent in minors. However, the CDC shows that out of 74 million US residents under age 18, there have only been 321 under-18 deaths associated with COVID in the United States in the last 18 months. You can see that data here: 

That's a total risk of 1 in 230,000 but truthfully, the minors that died with COVID all had extremely serious underlying chronic health complications, including diabetes and lung disease. Healthy children simply do not die of COVID.

In order to come to the "benefits outweigh the risks" conclusion, ACIP had to engage in a little sleight of hand. Rather than comparing all risks from a COVID infection to all risks from taking the vaccine, or just comparing myocarditis in minors with COVID to myocarditis in minors from the vaccine, they instead compared apples to oranges. They chose all risks from COVID and put it up against only myocarditis from the vaccine, and declared the vaccine victorious. ACIP also depended on using only diagnosed COVID cases in minors as the denominator, despite the fact that the vast majority of COVID cases in minors are asymptomatic or nearly so, and went undiagnosed and were never documented. The true denominator is larger by several orders of magnitude and honest comparison and analysis would not come close to showing that vaccinating anyone under age 18 to be the safer bet.

What this boils down to is the ethics of vaccinating healthy 12-17-year-olds, and, eventually, healthy 6-month-old babies, for a pathogen that presents a nearly-incalculable risk of death or hospitalization for them as individuals. One third of all COVID-associated deaths in the US were in people over the age of 85 who already outlived their life expectancies by more than a decade. 

95% of all COVID-associated deaths in the United States were adults over the age of 50, which means our healthy children will be vaccinated with a risky new technology to allegedly protect much older people from so-called asymptomatic transmission from a healthy child.  However, even Dr. Anthony Fauci has said, "In the history of respiratory viruses, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks."

The data on deaths shows an even more outrageous justification for vaccinating healthy children: 94% of COVID-associated deaths were in people with at least one preexisting health condition, usually 2 to 3 overlapping serious conditions. See here: 

And of these conditions, the number one determining factor in whether someone died with COVID was obesity. In an analysis of 238 US hospitals, 78% of COVID hospitalizations and deaths were in Americans who were classified as overweight or obese, and the risk of severe illness climbs sharply as BMI rises. 

It needs to be said: pharmaceutical companies and public health agencies do not have the power nor the right to use our children as shields for the elderly or the obese.

I do hope you'll reconsider vaccinating your child when the time comes. There is no emergency for this emergency use when it comes to kids, and the long term risks on fertility and overall health won't be known for another decade, maybe two. Sunshine, exercise, low sugar, a healthy diet, and some extra vitamin C and zinc are that our little ones need.



"Experimental vaccine death rate for Israel’s elderly 40 times higher than COVID-19 deaths: researchers
Pfizer's vaccine killed ‘about 40 times more (elderly) people’ and ‘260 times’ more of the young than ‘what the COVID-19 virus would have claimed in the given time frame.’"

Angus Files


Anti-vaxxers storm UK clinic in furious protest as they claim 'Covid jabs might kill you'

ANTI-VAXXERS stormed a UK clinic in a furious protest while claiming "Covid jabs might kill" people.

Pharma For Prison



Julie; Thank you.
I see that Carolyn Kylesmom is thinking about this too!

I put the link in my favorites.
Everyone here should put that link into your favorites too.
It will require us to pay 90 dollars like for a doctor's appointment and they will get me sure enough - for human use ivermectin pills. There are six of us, so six calls, but we will do it if we come down with covid. .

TOB: 1 out of 1,000 is a very high incidence of rare. Not rare in my book, I would not risk it now that I know what 1 out of l,000 is -- not one out of million -- far from it.

A DPT reaction was 1 out of 11,000 . That was what the health department paper said were reactions to the DPT vaccine back in the late 80s.

They were off on their math though. I found out later it was more like 1 out of 250 or less. LIARS then and Liars now -- maybe even more brazen than they were back in the day. .

To All of AGE of Autism Readers:

Oh, last night on the "Ingraham Angle" Ingraham had a guest on - a lawyer for a family that found out that their underage daughter was been coerced to get a vaccine with out her parents' consent. The daughter had a vaccine reaction from the DPT at age five which the daughter was unaware of.

The lawyer said that the CDC, and the pharma companies have already said that people that had previous reaction of the DPT vaccine should not receive the covid vaccine.

Lawyer's name Aaron Siri. You all know him don't you after listening to nine hours of Plotkin's deposition

My husband recorded it last night and watched it today with me again. I was trying to tell him who Aaron Siri was. He said my gosh you going to bow at the TV. Well yeah. I am . There are true heroes left in this world and we have to keep our eyes on such people or sink into despair.


Benedetta, totally off-topic but in response to past comments you have made, this is the link for anyone in the US who wants to get ivermectin via the Frontline Doctors.

Hope that helps.


Good point about "rare," Benedetta.

During the June 23 ACIP meeting, one of the committee members asked whether we would consider myocarditis incidence among young men getting the mRNA shot "rare," and noted that parents may think one thing, but doctors think another, when they use that word.

Dr. Sean O'Leary from the University of Colorado said, "There are standard definitions for adverse drug reactions. Rare is 1/1000 or 1/10,000 and very rare is less than 1/10,000."

Then O'Leary asserted, "By any measure, these [myocarditis events] would be considered 'rare' or 'very rare.'"

Of course, he was doing the sleight of hand everyone at CDC has done, which is a two-step: First, use the passive, massively underreported VAERS data for myocarditis incidents (instead of the more robust Israeli data), and second, count myocarditis incidents **per million shots administered across the total US population,** not across the subgroup that's overwhelmingly affected.

Let's get 1,000,000 people in the room, only one of whom is a woman. Then let's bombard them with chemicals and radiation. Only 1 will get breast cancer, so the incidence rate is 1 per 1,000,000! Very rare!

The true figure for myocarditis among men ages 16 to 30 getting mRNA shots is 1 in 4000. New York Magazine had a good piece about this a couple of months ago, and Dr. Vinay Prasad wrote something very cogent in MedPageToday recently:

Dr. Prasad points out a number of things that FDA and CDC have done wrong. He's a true believer in vaccines, but he can also do math. This is the type of article that should get through to friends who have been bombarded with the bald-faced "safe and effective" lie. A few highlights:

"Although they were aware of this safety signal, the FDA issued the EUA on May 10 for Pfizer's mRNA vaccine in kids ages 12 to 15. Despite the fact that the vaccine was already widely in use in people ages 16 and above under the existing EUA, specific rates of myocarditis in the U.S. for 'near age' vaccine recipients (kids ages 16 to 18) were not made publicly available. In other words, no data on myocarditis events in kids close in age to the group receiving the new EUA (those ages 12 to 15) were leveraged in the process for granting this EUA."

"Over the last 2 months, several news reports on clusters of cases of myocarditis after mRNA vaccination -- particularly in young men -- have been reported in the U.S. Revised estimates from Israel found the rate of myocarditis to be to one in 3,000 to one in 6,000 among males ages 16 to 24."

"The CDC did not consider the harms versus benefits of one versus two doses, but only the harms versus benefits of vaccination itself. But the CDC went beyond this. They also used base rates of infection from the past, rather than current rates of SARS-CoV-2 spread, which are substantially lower. They did not differentiate between healthy kids -- who are at risk of idiosyncratic events, such as myocarditis -- and kids with pre-existing medical conditions that place them at high risk of severe outcomes from COVID-19, including hospitalization.

"This insistence on an all-or-nothing, one-size-fits-all binary approach -- treating healthy kids who have recovered from confirmed prior infection as equivalent to infection-naive kids with comorbidities -- is at the heart of the fallacy underpinning ACIP's decision."

Carolyn Kylesmom

Look, I care very much that children have died of COVID.
I also care that children have died from the COVID vaccine .
We need to put the pressure on to demand treatments. How come Trunp and others survived? How come so many do not?
We need to care about EVERYONE including breakthrough cases and demand the same concern for our vaccine injured children (for decades) . We demand that even 1/2 the resources be put toward proving and finding treatments safer than the vaccine or even just effective for those who cannot take the vaccine and for those for whom the vaccine fails.
This is common sense and I am blown away by how it is ignored and how even us get caught up in proving rhe vaccine safe or not. Clearly it’s dangerous for many. And so is COVID. Hence let’s demand treatments for myocarditis vaccine injury and Covid and change rhe narrative rather than reacting to theirs

Still with Trump

I think the CDC idea for Fall is to sell psych meds to American children to counteract the stress of wearing a mask.

They will have something figured out by then.


This weekend on Fox News, I did not get the names of the talking heads, and mostly I am just passing through the room.

But one talking head said vaccine reaction and injuries happen but they are rare, in which the other talking head said, " No, they are not that rare".

Yeap no rare.

But everybody thinks so. Soooooo, a parent thinks --- rare these individuals of whom he speaks of.

How to address "rare".


Joe will be sending out his Vax Squad.......

"Florida state representative and U.S. House candidate Anthony Sabatini (R) tweeted Tuesday that a federal official knocking on people’s doors to pressure them to take the coronavirus vaccine “should be treated as a trespasser and ARRESTED.”

“Any Federal government employee that goes door to door pushing vaccination should be treated as a trespasser and ARRESTED,” Sabatini tweeted.

“We need to pass legislation to BAN this sick practice immediately,” he continued."

"Biden said Tuesday during remarks about those who have not been vaccinated, “Now we need to go community by community, neighborhood by neighborhood, and often times door by door — literally knocking on doors to get help to the remaining people.”

White House press secretary Jen Psaki also utilized a similar phrase Tuesday in which she explained coronavirus preventative measures will entail “targeted community by community, door to door outreach to get the remaining Americans vaccinated.”"



If it is a threat to Facebook- even better!

Perhaps this could be translated into a video and posted on Bitchute or other alternative media.


Great work!

Lockdown Sceptics 7 July 2021
Article--- The Many Errors Of Devi Sridhar
Tells Breakfast TV viewers categorically that "Zero children have died because of the [covid] vaccine side-effects " Oh What!

Bob Moffit

Any parent who reads Levi's excellent presentation on the KNOWN examples of serious health consequences of Covid vaccines on children .. including DEATH .. children who are KNOWN to have minimal consequences of Covid disease itself .. cannot say they were not warned.

Unfortunately … that old wise axiom … "You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink" applies … there are ample indications this covid vaccine EXPERIMENT is fraught with far too many UNKNOWN RISKS .. which may not surface until decades in the future … long after covid itself has become a dark memory in history.


This article states it so well, thank for presenting the situation so clearly.

I'm not very at math or logic as you know, but if 94% of people who died of 'covid' had underlying conditions, why is the government giving koolaid shots to teenagers who don't ? It's absurd and dangerous. The stuff doesn't even work, I think the Yankees showed us that. It's not safe either, as Hank Aaron and Tiffany Dover demonstrated so clearly on TV.

Perhaps Pfizer could be stripped of EUA and split apart - after all, racketeering is a crime.


There were brief moments of sanity at the ACIP meeting on June 23. Dr. Pablo Sanchez of Nationwide Children's Hospital in Columbus, Ohio, said: "I think we need to be very up-front about mentioning this potential risk [myocarditis] of vaccination, and hopefully the parents are aware of this before vaccination, rather than from the sheets that are given to them after vaccination."

Of course, nobody addressed his concern. It's good for parents to know that a nationally respected professor of pediatrics thinks they ought to be warned *before* giving their kids this mRNA product, not just told afterwards. Presumably the reason is for that good, old-fashioned idea of informed consent and the ability to say No.

Yet another nationally respected scientist wrote this eloquent piece about giving mRNA products to healthy kids. He believes in vaccines and even took a coronavirus shot himself, but he knows that the evidence does not currently support giving these products to kids. In a professional environment where anyone who expresses doubt is demonized, it must have taken tremendous courage and integrity to say what he said here:

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)