It’s Up to You
Autism Reaches 6% in British Schools - it’s just one of those things!

What Is Your Obligation To The Greater Good

Set yourself on fire
But you can get them a blanket

The New York Times ran an editorial over the weekend titled: Please Vaccinate Your Teenager to Protect My 4-Year-Old.

The author's daughter had/s cancer. (Is anyone ever really cancer free?) What kind of monster would not feel sympathy, and what kind of parent would not feel protective of Nusayba?  Most of us naturally look out for other people's children. We send nut free lunches even if our kids can eat Jif. We look out for kids in stores if they seem lost. We share Amber alerts and feel deep sorrow when we learn of a child's death.  Does that mean we should risk our own children on another child's behalf? And be shamed if we do not?

You and your kids could help protect my 4-year-old daughter’s life.

Nusayba was found to have a rare cancer at the age of 2. Since then, she has endured multiple rounds of chemotherapy and a liver transplant. Fortunately, she has been cancer-free for over a year now. Her cheeks have filled out, her bouncy, thick curls are growing back, and we can’t help indulging her love of cinnamon rolls and Dippin’ Dots.

The best news my family has heard since Nusayba was declared cancer-free is that the F.D.A. has authorized the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for 12- to 15-year-olds.

The headline reminded me of a meme I had seen several years ago: "You are not required to set yourself on fire to keep someone else warm."  In the language of Vaccinese, the new Esperanto, this means, you should not be required to endanger your own teen with an experimental vaccine to theoretically protect someone else's young child."

I commented on the NYT Facebook page.

Should we then demand a full paid vasectomy for all American boys once they reach puberty, to protect girls from pregnancy? We will give them a donut and a chance to win a tricked out Subaru. The boys can have a government funded reverse vasectomy when married and with enough provable income to support a family. This will protect society, protect girls and therefore is necessary. Of course not.

I got quite a few likes and two comments agreeing:

With today’s logic on the vaccine, this makes sense to me!
Brilliant analogy!

But many commenters failed to appreciate my analogy.

that is a ridiculous argument
not even the same
that is an asinine argument!
That really isn't relevant to the subject of vaccines. It would never happen because vasectomies are not designed to be reversible, though sometimes they can be. They are intended for men who are sure they don't want to father any more children.

By the way, the success rate for vasectomies as long as ten years ago is up to 95%. I imagine that today, doctors could create an experimental technique using the latest technology that would be even more successful. And if some boys are unable to father children in the future, that's terrible, but hey, "greater good," right. Think of the 4 year olds.....



What is Humanitarian De -Sensitisation ?
Would you be able to spot it from a distance ? Even if it is trying to sell you a "Pig in a Poke, served up as a lovely bag of jucy lemons?"

Guide to Covid-19 Vaccine Communications
States -"Change social norms to help gain acceptance "
A Practitioners Guide to the principles of Covid -19 Vaccine Communications December 2020

Does the Philosophy of "the Greatest Good for the Greatest Number" Have any Merit?
Article May 2018
Lockdown Sceptics Articles ,
Scottish Government Advisor U-Turns on Efficacy of AstraZenica against Varients
25 May 2021
Global Public Health Experts ?
Wet nursing/spoon feeding Billions of people with imitation /regurgitation of the Greater Good
Behavioural tendencies to want to throw dummies /pacifiers and toys from prams!
"Gripe Water ,does it work? and is it safe and effective for all ages ?
They will be getting left tae pick up their own dummies!?

Laura Hayes

Thank you, Anita Donnelly :)

You continue to raise excellent questions. Hopefully, they will not fall on deaf ears.

Laura Hayes


Thank you for your response :) A few months ago, I did an interview with a friend whose book just came out in April. The interview was featured here on AoA, and might answer some of the questions you asked:

Ryan is now 27. We did an intense ABA program beginning at age 2, continued through about age 19, then a less-intense one for about 6-7 more years, incorporating many more community outings once he was done with school. He participated in school through high school, for various portions of the day, which I deemed applicable and worthwhile for him (electives only by high school), always accompanied by a trained tutor from his home program, never allowing one assigned by the school (a near-annual battle). We have tried various diets and various treatments over the years, some with more or less success, and find that an organic, real-foods, home-cooked diet works well for him. Presently, he is a mostly-content young man, who brings us much joy, requires much work, and remains dependent on family members to care for him and his needs. He enjoys many activities (using the computer/iPad, being read to, doing puzzles, playing games, watching movies, community outings, etc.) and we intersperse them throughout his day and week, and we are grateful for his excellent physical health and abilities (able to jump on his trampoline, swim, walk and hike with us, etc.). We include him in all family activities and are fortunate that we can take him with us wherever we go. Having said all that, Ryan's ability to reach his full potential, including living an independent and productive life, was decimated by his "routine" childhood vaccinations.

As much as I try to share what happened to Ryan with as many others as I can, and as much as there are so many "Ryans" out there, I still feel like very few have the ears to hear, the eyes to see, the minds to understand, or the hearts to care...despite the overwhelming and undeniable evidence of the clearly unwell children and young adults who fill our schools and communities.

Anita Donnelly

Oh--and science should have, by now, figured out how to detect treat, and reverse vaccine injury.

And science should appreciate having control groups who never get vaccinated.

Also data science should welcome actual truth about the numbers harmed or potentially harmed by vaccines, and not try to shut down discussion or tools like twitter than can signal when a lot number has a problem.

Shutting us down is paternalistic and authoritarian. And ridiculing parents of vaccine injured just creates desperate parents who don't know where to turn.

Anita Donnelly

@laurahayes a profoundly important speech.

Here is the 2 points I would like us to start making:

1) I believe in science and math. Science and data science (math) should be able to find out:
a) why vaccines are not safe for everyone
b) what to do as an alternative
c) how to detect when a vaccine injury does occur

2) the greater good is your child is protected from the measles and mine gets to retains his fully functional brain. When we accept sacrificing my child's future to protect yours, we have created eugenics.


God Bless You Laura Hayes.

How else has ASD crippled Ryan? He can’t live independently at all? How severe is he?

What foods/diets/biomed has helped him?


"Since then, she has endured multiple rounds of chemotherapy and a liver transplant."

Does anyone remember Barney Clark?

"Dec. 2, 1982: Barney Clark Takes One for the Team
An ailing Seattle dentist becomes the first recipient of a permanent artificial heart. More or less permanent."

The Jarvik-7 heart opened the door for the commercialization of organ transplants.

This from 2009:
'Organ trafficking': Rabbis arrested over massive crime ring

"One rabbi, Levy Izhak Rosenbaum, was charged with conspiring to broker the sale of a human kidney for transplant.

Marra said Rosenbaum's "business was to entice vulnerable people to give up a kidney for $US10,000 ($A12,300), which he would turn around and sell for 160,000 dollars."

He'd allegedly been peddling kidneys for a decade."

So, where did the liver for this child come from? You have to be a LIVING donor. Did that child consent? It is well known that child trafficking can end in organ "donation."

Cancer treatment that destroys the immune system IS NOT A TREATMENT.
The Bible says that if you hate someone in your thoughts it is as murder. Waiting and hoping someone will die so you can have their organs is HATE.

Jesus offers us healing through faith in Him.

Look at what Paul Offitt's CHOP hospital is up to now:

Researchers Discover New Disease That Prevents Formation of Antibodies

"When Luke Terrio was about seven months old, his mother began to realize something was off. He had constant ear infections, developed red spots on his face, and was tired all the time. His development stagnated, and the antibiotics given to treat his frequent infections stopped working. His primary care doctor at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) ordered a series of blood tests and quickly realized something was wrong: Luke had no antibodies." "....they realized Luke’s condition was unlike any disease described before." "CHOP researchers discovered the genetic mutation responsible for his condition, which prevents Luke and patients like him from making B cells and antibodies to fight infections." "the family decided to proceed with a bone marrow transplant in the hope that the procedure would help him make his own B cells and antibodies. Soon they discovered they had a perfect match living under their own roof: Luke’s older brother, Jack.

At three and a half years of age, Jack, who has HIGH FUNCTIONING AUTISM, donated his bone marrow to Luke."


Donna L.

Amen, Bob.

Laura Hayes

In my first rally speech against CA's SB277 back in April of 2015, I covered, and countered, the vaccine profiteers' tactic of trying to induce/coerce/mandate parents to vaccinate their own children to supposedly protect other people's children. For those interested, I have cut and pasted it below, and also included a video link for it.

"Today marks a sad day in the history of California. Today is a day where we have had to come from near and far to oppose medical tyranny and to fight for what is rightfully ours, the right to decide what we allow into our bodies, and the bodies of our children. Our right is under fierce attack by the very people we elected to protect our rights. If the right to decide what goes into our bodies, and those of our children, is wrongfully taken from us, what meaningful rights do we have?

How did we arrive at this place in time, where if SB 277 becomes law, police will be required to forcibly take our children, against our will, to be force-vaccinated...with scores of doctors and nurses who have sworn to “first, do no harm”, and who are ethically and legally required to obtain prior, voluntary, and informed consent before any and all medical procedures...including vaccination? How has it come to this?

I will tell you how. It begins with lies. Lies that vaccines are miraculously safe and effective for all, unlike any other drug or medical procedure...which is especially unbelievable as there are well over one-hundred of them. Lies that vaccines are solely responsible for eradicating certain diseases. Lies that vaccines have been properly tested, both individually and in the multiple combinations in which they are administered. Lies that pharmaceutical companies don’t have corrupt influence over government regulators. Lies that vaccine research is without fraud. Lies that fraudulent vaccine research is true. Lies that toxic vaccine ingredients are safe. Lies denying cover-ups of the causal links between vaccines and the endless list of conditions now crippling the health, development, and well-being of our nation’s children. Lies that informed consent is taking place before vaccination. Lies that someone is actually monitoring our nation’s children post-vaccination. Lies that vaccine side effects, injuries, and deaths are tracked. Lies that our nation has a program in place that takes care of the vaccine-injured. Lies that even though no doctor and no company is liable for vaccine injuries and vaccine deaths, safety remains a priority. Lies that doctors admit and report vaccine injuries, deaths, and failures. Lies that pharmaceutical companies tell the truth. Lies that pharmaceutical companies behave ethically when it comes to vaccines, despite multi-million and multi-billion dollar lawsuits won against them for fraud and deception year in and year out. Lies that vaccine injury is rare. Lies that vaccines don’t harm and don’t kill. Lies that vaccines never cause Autism, and also don’t seizure disorders, learning and behavioral disorders, asthma, life-threatening food allergies, tics, SIDS, cancer, Type 1 Diabetes, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, paralysis, and more. That lengthy list reminds me of the saying: Vaccines...the leading cause of coincidences in the world.

Lies, lies, and more lies...that is how we have arrived at this time today where our legislators think they have the right to disregard and undo the Constitution; the right to ignore that which our country was founded upon, religious freedom, specifically, the freedom to think, believe, and practice in our own way; the right to defy international codes of ethics such as the Nuremberg Code, which prohibits forced medical treatments and procedures, of any kind, including vaccination. Our legislators also seem to think they have the right to violate sacred, God-given parental rights, and the right to insist that millions of parents all submit to a one-size-fits-all prescription, make that scores of prescriptions, which have a long, undeniable history of harming, disabling, and killing.

We must ask these legislators: What Constitutional powers have been bestowed upon you to mandate that I must inject my child with known neurotoxins, known carcinogens, ingredients proven to disrupt and destroy both the nervous and immune systems, ingredients that will destroy my child’s gut and gastrointestinal tract...ingredients that YOU, Senators and Assembly Members, wouldn’t allow in your morning cup of coffee, but that we must inject into our children? What legal or moral authority gives you the right to mandate that I must allow risky medical procedures for my child, numerous times over the course of 18 years, procedures that have the very real potential to cause great harm, grave injury, permanent disability, and death? YOU DON’T HAVE THE RIGHT and YOU DON’T HAVE THE AUTHORITY to order parents to play medical Russian roulette with their children.

I would like to address the recurrent mention that all must be vaccinated to protect the immunocompromised. The elephant in the room that refuses to be acknowledged is how and why do we have so many children and young adults today who are classified as immunocompromised? Could it be that the very vaccines they received, possibly beginning in utero, and subsequently on the day of birth, and at regular intervals thereafter, when their blood-brain-barriers were wide open and their immune systems were undeveloped and unable to handle the barrage of toxins and viruses contained in vaccines, could it be that they are immunocompromised due to the vaccines they received? And now legislators propose to mandate that other children be force- vaccinated until everyone is ill beyond repair?

Furthermore, for the children who are seriously immunocompromised, going out in public is a danger to them, and their parents must decide if they need to be kept at home until re-entry into social settings is possible. Vaccinating all children in the state of CA will not protect them. There will always be diseases circulating to which they will be exposed, including the common cold. There will always be those for whom vaccines don’t work. There will always be those whose temporary, partial, and artificial vaccine- induced immunity has waned and is no longer present. There will always be those who just received live-virus vaccines, who are actually contagious and shedding the very diseases against which they were vaccinated. There will always be a risk for those who are immunocompromised...there is always a risk for every one. That does not mean that others should be forced to endure risk to supposedly protect them. Furthermore, that is not the government’s decision to make. Risk-benefit health care decisions must be made for children by their parents, who know them best, who know their present health status, who know the child’s family history, and who know there are many ways to protect, maintain, and enhance their child’s health...risk-free ways...without risk- laden vaccines.

It is the responsibility of all parents of immunocompromised children to take the needed measures to protect their children. It is not the responsibility of other children, most especially if it could mean chronic illness, permanent disability, or death for those children. It is no one’s right to put themselves in the position of valuing one child’s life over another’s.

I am the mother of a severely vaccine-injured child who is now 21 years old. He is a boy in a man’s body, fully dependent on others. He did not complete high school or go to college. He is not capable of earning a living or living independently, he will not get married or have children. As a matter of fact, he will never even go out on a first date. He was robbed of ever living a typical and independent life because he was poisoned and disabled by vaccines beginning in 1994, continuing through 1998. There was no informed consent, no acknowledgement of his loss of skills and development of strange behaviors after every single set of vaccines. There was no admitting that he received a minimum of 237.5 mcg of neurotoxic mercury, and neurotoxic aluminum, and formaldehyde, and anti-freeze, and animal cells and viruses, and allergy-causing food proteins, and known carcinogens. No government agent has followed up on his vaccine injuries so the same thing won’t happen to other children. He is one of the unacknowledged, uncounted, uncompensated, ignored, discounted, and publicly-denied victims who make up the ever-increasing epidemic of vaccine-injured persons.

There is indeed an urgent public health crisis sweeping the country and it is NOT measles, mumps, or chicken pox.

It is Vaccine Injury.

Vaccine Injury is THE public health crisis facing us today.

Thank you all for coming here today to help end this vaccine madness, this medical fascism, this oppressive tyranny...this present evil.

Bob Moffit

Until the FDA, HHS, CDC, IOM and other regulatory bureaucracies that approve and recommend vaccines … guarantees that a "one size fits all vaccine" .. is SAFE FOR EVERY CHILD … has ABSOLUTELY NO RISK OF INJURIES … NONE .. then .. and only then ,, should THEY recommend vaccines for all.

THEY can begin by conducting that common sense study of vaccinated v unvaccinated populations to ascertain if BOTH populations are suffering the same chronic autoimmune disorders now diagnosed for 54% of children today. Then they can REMOVE THE PRODUCT LIABILITY PROTECTIONS for vaccine industry .. making THE INDUSTRY RESPONSIBLE FOR INJURIES THEY CAUSE .. while improving VAERS VOLUNATARY monitoring system to capture 100% of vaccine injuries instead of present 1%.




Childhood Cancers hav e been exploding in numbers since 1986 when Regan gave vaccine companies ZERO liability. Cancer in 4 year olds is very sad. Some people think the increase in cancer is from the food, water or air we breathe. When a 4 year old gets ravaged from cancer, he or she has not eaten enough food, drank enough water or breathed enough air to get cancer...Most of the cancers are coming from elements in the Vaccines. There is Cancer-Causing Formaldehyde, Tumorigenic aborted human fetal cell DNA, Neurotoxic Aluminum & more. The first Polio vaccine was made from Cervical Cancer Cells.
Its no longer Pharma for Prison, Its Pharma for PRIONS!

Donna L.

Funny how those who want us to set our kids on fire to keep their kids warm are never around to help us put out the fire. In 22+ years of providing 24/7/365 care for my son who regressed into autism after vaccines he received in honor of the Greater Good, I've not once been helped (or thanked) by any parents like the ones in this article. Maybe an alternate title/topic for that editorial should be: "Please Protect My Autistic Teenager Whose Life Was Trashed Trying to Protect Your 4 Year Old."


The state wants a one sided obligation.
No state obligation to provide a safe product with honest and ongoing appraisements.
No state obligation to provide care when there are serious afflictions.
No access to public forums (they used to call it free speech) to discuss problems encountered.
A donut and a lottery ticket, costs paid by taxpayers.

The state is offering a burden of financial deficit for taxpayers who fund vaccine development, surveillance development, pharmaceutical marketing,and leave families with consequential illness and death and difficult circumstances.

I'll take door number 3.


Organ donation should be required of executed prisoners. China does this mandatory organ donation and I support it. Most boys and girls with autism should be castrated to control their lewd and aggressive behavior and prevent a hereditary disease from being passed on no matter how rare that might happen. Many with autism are too disabled to understand how too reproduce or too Homosexual to do so.
Most vaccine save lives let us bring back the reasonable "Green the Vaccines" movement.

Gary Ogden

When we thought the New York Times could not sink any lower, they've surprised us once again. Merely from the reports to VAERS, these vaccines have proven, not to be safe, but to be far more dangerous than any other vaccine put on the market, and we know little yet about long-term adverse effects. We do know that the primary pathology is thrombotic, and this is caused by the spike protein. Billions of these spike-protein-inducing gene altering particles are injected with each dose. It's not nice to fool with Mother Nature, as the jingle once said.


The vasectomy analogy is dead on. Or imagine the outcry if we encouraged (with $250 million worth of promotional messages, plus donts, lottery tickets, etc.) prison inmates with life sentences to donate organs. People die while waiting for organ transplants, right? But no one, regardless of the crimes he has committed, owes you his kidney.

If we sacrifice our own children by rolling the dice for a vague "greater good" argument that somehow, they're increasing the chances of a magical happy future for everyone else, we have failed as a species. Monkeys do a better job. My 14-year-old is infinitely precious to me, and my only responsibility as a parent is to take care of her. I would no more give her this experimental Pfizer garbage for the "greater good" than I would compel her to donate a kidney to a stranger. She does not owe it to a single human being to take on harm and damage to herself.

Asking people to take on a concrete harm in order to build some vague paradise is precisely the argument of every totalitarian government. The thing you have to do (get injected with an experimental product with a track record of harm, miss a year of school, be kept from your friends) is always concrete and real. The "benefit" is a maybe, pie-in-the-sky, that moves constantly: Flatten the curve, protect the "vulnerable" (usually undefined), prevent all new infections, stamp out variants, "get back to normal," etc.

Kids all over this country were thrown under the bus 14 months ago because Boomers were scared and we were all told it was the decent thing to do. Never again, and certainly not with an experimental injected gene therapy.

P.S. Mr. Ali is a Daily Beast columnist and his wife is a doctor. I wonder how he would respond to a plea from a homeless mom: "Sell your Upper West Side co-op so I can rent an apartment and food for my kids." Are he and his wife living organ donors? "Give up your kidney so I can get off dialysis."

P.P.S. He also spouts the lie that has been making its way around: "Science tells us the vaccines are safe for adults and kids 12 and older." Um, no. A rushed, literally unprecedented bureaucratic process concluded that "the known benefits outweigh the known risks." The Pfizer product has specifically *not* been found to be "safe," which is a term of art with real FDA meaning. The other thing totalitarian regimes have always done is claim that science is on their side. They've worked out just what we all need to suffer in order to ensure X future benefit for the whole human race. Just trust them. They used the word "science," so they must be right.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)