Imagine for a second, that you put your minivan in the shop to get the brakes repaired.

And imagine, if when you picked up the repaired vehicle, the mechanic said "I've finished repairing your vehicle, and I believe the newly installed brakes are unlikely to pose a specific risk to anyone who rides in this vehicle."

Do you think that anyone in their right mind, would ever drive away in that vehicle with their children?

Gen X and Millennials are indeed affected, but where’s the talk about autism + chronic/mental illness rates in Generation Z/“zoomers”? Even more vaccinated than their already vaccinated, already ill counterparts.

USA has the highest vaccine schedule in the world, most healthcare costs...

are actual autism rates significantly higher than 1 in 54 kids? Is the USA media hiding the actual numbers from the public (is the prevalence 1 in 5?)

Bob

Sorry, you comment accidentally ended up in the spam.

Super hard to find this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cP_nDGUN8Fg&t=53s

Wasn’t safe when they vaccinated me with the flu in ‘2000. They still haven’t figured out how dangerous that was to us!

Vaccine worship, combined with the genderfluid trans Tumblr lunatic fringe nationwide.

Yes, definitely "weasel words" There are no "specific risks for pregnant people" Of course, nothing is said about whether are "specific risks for fetuses" or what the long term effects on the babies are.
And they can't know this, because pregnant people were excluded from the initial studies, as were people about to get pregnant.
We know there are plenty of things that are "safe for pregnant people" that are not safe for the fetuses they carry. Thalidomide, for example, springs to mind. Safe for the pregnant woman taking it for morning sickness, but linked with severe birth defects in the fetus. Or the simple, commonly used advil/ibuprofen.
https://utswmed.org/medblog/nsaid-warning-fda-pregnancy/#:~:text=However%2C%20taking%20ibuprofen%2C%20aspirin%2C,kidney%20problems%20in%20the%20baby.
If taken in the third trimester, advil can cause kidney damage in the babies, and low amniotic fluid in the third trimester.

And of course, even eating too much tuna can be bad for the fetus..

We don't even have nine months of COVID vaccine data, so there is no usable science on pregnancy outcomes for the babies. pregnant women and women trying to get pregnant were specifically excluded from the trial studies.

Future fertility problems in the potential mothers will take years to show in the data.

Similarly, an increased risk of injuries like kidney problems or clotting or stroke problems in the babies will take years to collate. Depending on the issue, neurological damage won't necessarily be able to be identified until the baby is older.

We do already know from initial antibody studies in babies born to vaccinated pregnant women that for good or ill , the baby is affected by the shot. As well as the antibodies, we don't know other effects, and certainly cannot yet break down effects by trimester.

I hope these shots are safe, but all anyone can offer right now is a guess.
Science that does not exist, is not science.

I am of the male gender, so was never at risk of pregnancy, but I well remember a time, it seems like only five minutes ago, but surely was no more than ten or fifteen years ago, when virtually everything except wholesome food, and clean air and water were contra-indicated in pregnancy, including most drugs, and certainly vaccines. If you're a doctor in Oregon, don't question the narrative, or the standards of care brought down from the mountain, don't rock the boat or there will be consequences. Oregonians, why do you put up with this crap, with these charlatans who call themselves medical professionals, with the pharma cult which has infiltrated every government agency, local, state, and federal? By the way, I cannot too highly recommend Weston A. Price's "Nutrition and Physical Degeneration," published in 1948, but still in print. A practicing dentist, and the lead researcher for the ADA's research lab, he went around the world in the 1930's to try to understand why the dental health of children born in the 20th Century had taken such a turn for the worse. He discovered that traditional people developed their diets based upon what was locally available which promoted the birth of perfect babies. Nothing more important than healthy babies, is there?