Pfizer, Moderna et al Covid Products are Medical Devices Not "Vaccines"
Thank you to Anne Dachel for working with Dr. Ken Stoller for this most interesting piece on AofA:
Dr. Ken Stoller of San Francisco, a longtime advocate for medical freedom, recently sent me his opinion on mandating the COVID-19 vaccine.
Below is his advice as a physician. You’ll notice that his opening argument is that it’s not really a vaccine. The COVID-19 ‘injection’ does not do what we all assume a true vaccine should do.
You are not antivax if you are against the COVID-19 injections
You are not anti-vax because the COIVD injections are not vaccines.
Yes, they are being called vaccines, but this is to bypass the regulatory requirements for a medical device.
This ‘vaccine’ is actually a medical device that has never been used in humans before and rushed to market without any appreciation for what it will do either in the short term or long term.
This injection is also being called a vaccine to gain more acceptance, because most people assume that all vaccines are safe and effective. That’s what the CDC tells us. So if it is a vaccine, it must be safe and effective for ending the pandemic.
Some sources have indicated the adverse event rate for COVID-19 injections is as high as 80 percent, and that would include all the minor adverse events.
But if the short-term adverse event rate is 80 percent, what is in store for the long term?
They honestly don’t know and really don’t care.
Politics and eugenics, not science or good public health practices, are what is driving this grand medical experiment dwarfing the Tuskegee incident by a billion-fold.
While this is an over simplification, a vaccine, as defined by the CDC & FDA, is procedure that introduces into the body a foreign protein or weakened virus or bacteria and activates the immune system to make antibodies to same. In theory, to be effective, those antibodies actually have to perform in a useful manner.
If it works as advertised, a vaccine gets in your body and programs itself to attack the infection should it cross your path. It has to stimulate both immunity and disrupt transmission by definition, but the COVID-19 injection does not encourage your body to program your immune system. Instead, it is the program.
This mRNA injection bypasses that step and takes over the programming of our cells to make proteins it wants to make, which presumably will stop, prevent or modulate the infection in question – in this case the COVID-19 virus.
In actuality, all the COVID-19 injection does is provide a treatment to supposedly modulate the severity of the COVID-19 illness should you get it and become symptomatic.
In other words, it is a treatment – a genetic treatment that has never been used in humans before.
And if it is only a treatment that neither prevents infection nor transmission, in truth, it is no better than any of the other treatments floating around like Ivermection/Zinc/Vit D/HCQ/Vit C/ HBOT/ozone, etc.
Obviously the COVID-19 injection is the treatment the so-called experts want you to have because not only are they so invested in it for economic and political reasons, but because it allows them to exercise even more control over the population, which is what this has been all about anyway.
We simply do not know what the long-term consequences are of turning the cells in our bodies into manufacturing plants for the proteins the mRNA gene treatment is going to cause.
We do know that there are other treatments and if this were just called a ‘treatment’ people would ask how it stacks up to the other available treatments.
I would argue it is not even a biologic because it is so clearly gene manipulation – direct gene manipulation – something that has never ever taken place before in the history of mankind.
So many people are defending vaccines that they can’t see what is staring them in the face, namely that this is not a vaccine, regardless of how many say it is.
Please stop calling it a vaccine when it is not.
If it does not prevent transmission or protect you from getting the infection, why are authorities so anxious for everyone to get it?
That is the question we all should be asking. Yes, it is about money, but could there be other reasons as well, like eugenics?
In truth this is a medical device, and it should undergo the safety evaluations any medical device needs to undergo.
K Paul Stoller, MD, FACHM
A two day fast will re-set your immune system. One 20th of one percent of the population died last year. That’s still zero.
Posted by: Kevin | June 03, 2021 at 06:02 AM
I know 2 people in my town who have died from this shot. One in his 50s died within 8 hours of the shot, the other man was 70 died 3 days after his second shot. My cousins daughter 25 and in perfect health no allergies went into shock and throat swelled up after first shot and she couldn't breath, had to be rushed to the ER, she almost died. Another man in my town had his entire body break out in shingles after the second shot. His doctor told him that the covid vaccine can reactivate varicella-zoster virus, if he had chicken pox in the past and it will present as shingles. He told him he should have had a shingles shot before getting the covid shot. No one is telling anyone that. This man said he is in excruciating pain and on 3 medications. It feels like hot needles going into his body all over from the neck down. Sorry but I'll take my chances with a cold. Also I had a reaction to the PCR swab. I only had a nostril swab but had a very intense reaction, throbbing headache, eyes watering, mucous buildup, congested, non stop sneezing. The hospital swore up and down there was nothing on the swab. Lahey Medical Nurses hung up on my twice. I finally got the name of their medical suppliers and confirmed with the sales rep at Puritan Medical in Guilford NH that the swabs are sterilized in ethylene oxide a known carcinogen, that causes cancer, leukemia, brain hemorrhaging, sterility, cataracts, just to name a few. When I contacted our middle school on their swabs I discovered the swabs that are being provided to them via the state are sterilized in gamma radiation. gamma radiation is highly penetrateable. I have no idea what level of radiation is retained in these swabs however I do know that people are not being informed of these risks. I was told by my daughters camp that she cannot attend if she doesn't get two pcr tests, I offered for her to do a saliva test only and I would pay for them, I'm still waiting to hear. These are clear violations of nuremberg code. People need to start filing lawsuits to get the point across. They clearly do not care about the health of the people because a cold is easier to manage than shingles, leukemia and or cancer.
Posted by: Mary | April 20, 2021 at 07:47 AM
Sorry forgot the link..
Norway urgently changes Covid vaccine guidance after 23 die in days following Pfizer jab.
Pharma For Prison
Posted by: angus files | January 15, 2021 at 07:41 PM
Norway urgently changes Covid vaccine guidance after 23 die in days following Pfizer jab
NORWAY has reported 23 elderly people have died just days after taking the COVID-19 vaccine.
By STEVEN BROWN
PUBLISHED: 19:47, Fri, Jan 15, 2021 | UPDATED: 21:15, Fri, Jan 15, 2021
The European nation reported that 23 elderly people have died within days of taking the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, with 13 of those deaths said to be related to "side effects". All those who suffered supposed side effects were nursing home patients and at least 80 years old.Despite the deaths, health officials have not expressed concern but instead plan to adjust their guidance on who should receive the vaccine.
Steinar Madsen, medical director with the Norwegian Medicines Agency, said: "It is quite clear that these vaccines have very little risk, with a small exception for the frailest patients.
"Doctors must now carefully consider who should be vaccinated.
"Those who are very frail and at the very end of life can be vaccinated after an individual assessment.”Pharmaceutical firm Pfizer - whose vaccine is also being distributed in the UK - said it is “aware of the reported deaths”.
A spokeswoman for the company said: "Norwegian authorities have prioritised the immunisation of residents in nursing homes, most of whom are very elderly with underlying medical conditions and some which are terminally ill.
"(The Norwegian Medicine Agency confirms) the number of incidents so far is not alarming, and in line with expectations.
"All reported deaths will be thoroughly evaluated by (the agency) to determine if these incidents are related to the vaccine. “The Norwegian government will also consider adjusting their vaccination instructions to take the patients’ health into more consideration."
Besides those that died, nine had suffered serious side effects including allergic reactions, strong discomfort and severe fever.
Seven had less serious ones such as pain at the injection site.
Norway have reported more than 57,000 cases and 500 coronavirus-related deaths so far.
Pharma For Prison
Posted by: angus files | January 15, 2021 at 04:25 PM
Gee Fred, I thought it was common knowledge SV40 tumors are killing off baby boomers.
You should read the book:
The Virus and the Vaccine The True Story of a Cancer-Causing Monkey Virus, Contaminated Polio Vaccine and the millions of Americans Exposed - by Debbie Bookchin & Jim Schumacher
Posted by: Beleaguered Autism Mom | January 11, 2021 at 02:26 AM
Cancer is a fascinating field. Uncontrolled cell growth. No differentiation of the cells. Liquid cancers, solid cancers, childhood cancers, on the rise. What causes all this cancer and why do these cells divide in an uncontrolled manner ? Don't they know big data controls everything now.
One thought that's been floated is that DNA directs cellular division and that by disturbing the DNA, one may cause cancer. My DNA may be disturbed by many things including virus, radiation, vaccines containing extraneous human DNA from fetal donors, and other such insults. Imagine an itty, bitty amplification sequence broke off the Pfizer vaccine and ended up in my DNA, turning on an oncogene. I'm sure Pfizer's looked at this 6 ways to Sunday, but I don't believe them...at all. That's why they need liability protection, and received it from law makers who who received campaign contributions from Pfizer.
That's also why I take lots of vitamin C and never take vaccines.
Posted by: drymeadow | January 11, 2021 at 12:16 AM
"they have no idea of what it will do in the human body. Offit makes clear that all recipients will be unwittingly participating in a massive uncontrolled experiment. The public is being told "safe and effective". A LIE."
You make it sound as though this is an unusual situation. It's certainly true for wireless radiation, as I pointed out in my monograph. It's true for water fluoridation, as I pointed out in my JDIS paper. It's true for almost every OSHA "regulated" substance, as I pointed out in my OSHA monograph (https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/60067).
There's a lesson to be learned here. If you're waiting for protection from the adverse effects of new technologies by nameless and faceless bureaucrats in D.C. and your State capitols, you'll be waiting a long time. The only one who will fully protect you, to the degree that protection is possible is - you guessed it - yourself. No one else will do it for you. At some point you, the collective you, will have to take at least some responsibility for your own health. A lot of these adverse effects from the substances I have listed above are in the literature. Nobody wants to spend the time looking for them. They want their doctor, or the FCC, or the FDA, or the WHO, or..... to tell them it's safe, so they can continue BAU. These officials may do it for some substances to some degree, but don't expect full across-the board protection.
Posted by: Ronald N. Kostoff | January 10, 2021 at 07:39 PM
"Do your expert friends think that cell phones and towers are just components of harmless communication systems too?"
I did not ask them that question; I asked only about Dr. Stoller's statement. They have seen my paper in TL on 5G (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037842742030028X) and my monograph titled "The Largest Unethical Medical Experiment in Human History", and they disagreed with neither. How that impacts their behavior is another issue. I know many people who agree with those two documents, yet continue to use their cell phones and WiFi.
I'm less concerned with whether we call this inoculation a vaccine or a treatment or a device, and more concerned that a substance has been put on the market that had no mid- or long-term testing, and whatever tests were done were not done on the most vulnerable demographic who supposedly would benefit from the inoculation. The least vulnerable demographic is the young, and if there are adverse mid- or long-term effects, they will bear the brunt.
And, the term "put on the market" is misleading. It implies consumer choice. This inoculation may be mandatory for some groups, and may be a requirement for other groups to access specific services (airline access, jobs, schools, etc).
I lay out many of these vaccine-related problems in detail in the most recent paper linked in the previous email.
Posted by: Ronald N. Kostoff | January 10, 2021 at 07:13 PM
I have been told there is a lady on Facebook in a very poor way after having the Moderna vaccine named Shawn Skelton.I pray for Shawn.
The very brave lady has made a video of her body spasming and her tongu for everyone to take heed.
The makers of Moderna were going to get back to her but haven't..
Thank you Shawn..
Pharma For Prison
Posted by: angus files | January 10, 2021 at 06:31 PM
Who died from cancer due a polio vaccine?
Posted by: Frederic Chopin | January 10, 2021 at 05:32 PM
Thank you Linda1 for your comments. There are so many unknowns about this TREATMENT, that we are walking a razor's edge of a potential medical disaster the likes of which has never before been seen.
For context, how polio vaccine recipients went on to develop cancer and die from that cancer compared to the number of polio cases reduced from the vaccine? We actually may never know because when the problematic vaccine came out the CDC changed the definition of polio... you had to be paralyzed for over 60 days... with that change in definition, it made the vaccine look like it was working... did it?
Posted by: Kenneth Stoller | January 10, 2021 at 03:57 PM
Do your expert friends think that cell phones and towers are just components of harmless communication systems too?
Posted by: Linda1 | January 09, 2021 at 11:04 AM
Link to above Offit/Bauchner interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4xClOYM3iE
Posted by: Linda1 | January 09, 2021 at 08:17 AM
Below transcripted excerpt is from a December 2, 2020 interview of FDA Vaccine Advisory Committee member and career vaccine promoter, Paul Offit MD, with Dr. Howard Bauchner, JAMA editor in chief. Anyone who claims that this is just a vaccine that is eliciting an immune response is ignorant. This is a very very very dangerous drug, or device, whatever you want to call it. They had no business approving it because as Offit states below, they have no idea of what it will do in the human body. Offit makes clear that all recipients will be unwittingly participating in a massive uncontrolled experiment. The public is being told "safe and effective". A LIE.
Any public health official or administrator should all be held criminally responsible for the outcome, including the 56 year old obstetrician who died this last week when his body attacked his own platelets leaving him with an untreatable platelet count of 0 that experts around the country were unable to fix. Poor guy died of a sudden hemorrhage and Pfizer is denying a connection as they take care of their shareholders instead of patients. Where are the experts who collaborated on this poor man's care?
Why aren't they speaking up?
(The print in bold below is my emphasis):
Dr. Baucher: “…Does the notion that this is mRNA [vaccine] make you more concerned or less concerned?
Dr. Offit: “Well, more concerned. I mean, WE HAVE NO COMMERCIAL EXPERIENCE WITH A MESSENGER RNA VACCINE. So what we’ve done is you take this naked piece of messenger RNA. You encapsulate it into this complex lipid delivery system which enables the cell then to take it up. I mean, if you just injected messenger RNA, the ribonucleases in your body would immediately destroy it. So it wouldn’t work. So you ‘re trying to protect it to get it into the cell. So now once it’s in the cell, that messenger RNA is self reproducing in a sense. So and now you’re making the protein. You’re making the coronavirus spike protein which then for the most part gets inserted onto the cell membrane and to a lesser extent gets excreted into the circulation.
WHAT TURNS IT OFF?
WHAT MAKES IT SO THAT IT IS NO LONGER MAKING CORONAVIRUS SPIKE PROTEIN ANYMORE?
If you look at the animal model studies, mice, for example, you would ASSUME that goes on for about 10 days.
BUT WHAT HAPPENS IN HUMANS, I DON’T KNOW.
I MEAN, WE WILL FIND THAT OUT, I THINK OVER TIME.
The other thing is that it’s also true of all proteins that, foreign proteins. It’s going to be broken up into like a 15 or 20 mer piece that’s then put on the surface of that cell so that you can stimulate either with MHC1 or 2 glycoprotein to stimulate cytotoxic T cells, to stimulate T helper cells, because this mRNA is going to also be picked up by antigen presenting cells.
SO WHICH IS MORE COMMON?
IS IT BEING PICKED UP PRIMARILY BY MYOCTYES? MUSCLE CELLS?
IS IT BEING PICKED UP PRIMARILY BY ANTIGEN PRESENTING CELLS?
WHEN IT’S PICKED UP BY THE MYOCYTES IS IT JUST PICKED UP BY THE MYOCYTES THAT ARE TO SOME EXTENT DAMAGED AS YOU PUT, AS YOU INJECT IT?
I MEAN, ANTIGEN PRESENTING CELLS ARE MORE LIKELY TO ACT AS SCAVENGERS AND PICK IT UP MORE EASILY.
WHAT’S GOING ON?
YOU KNOW, YOU DON’T KNOW EXACTLY ALL OF THAT.
So, it’s always a little uncertain because you know, I just think you have to be humble in all of this, that THERE ARE THINGS I AM SURE THAT WE DON’T KNOW YET and so we have to be open to the fact that we don’t know everything.
So keep our eyes open."
Posted by: Linda1 | January 09, 2021 at 08:16 AM
I have asked some knowledgeable colleagues to comment on Dr. Stoller's article. These comments (with names redacted) follow. As for my own views, they have been stated clearly in some recent articles whose links I posted on AoA:
“It pretty much fits the definition of a vaccine. It's just a new technology in vaccination. It does not treat anything; it stimulates the immune system to produce antibodies.
As for mutations, E484 is a potential candidate for antibody/vaccine escape. It is present in the South African variant; a similar mutation has appeared in Brazil.”
“No, I do not agree at all. This is yet one more effort to cloud the landscape of the pandemic management. The mRNA-based vaccine does what every vaccine in the world is supposed to do: to stimulate the human body to produce antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. It does it by inciting our own cells to produce the protein that is present at the pin heads of the virus (without having the same pathogenic effect of course) so that our body produces the antibodies necessary to fight the actual virus when it detects the same protein in body fluids. This is an actual vaccine, only that it is much more specific than most, and the way it works is different than any other. It is the first of a new generation of vaccines that reap the benefits of the advances in synthetic biology, genetic and metabolic engineering.”
“I definitely cannot agree with this.
Generally speaking, any compound that artificially induces a SPECIFIC immune response has the arbitrary name of "vaccine" (for that I encourage you to read again the origin and the story of its name). For sure it is not a gene therapy as it does not frolicky enter our genes or hinder our genetic mechanisms.
It is just a new way to induce a specific immune response. If it will induce long term memory cells, if the generated memory clones can cover new variants of the virus, so on and so forth - these are issues to be further clarified.”
“I can't agree more with  - and any effective and safe vaccine against this awful disease named Covid-19 is extremely attractive. We are seeing in my country during these last days that most of us as health professionals, and more generally (almost) the entire population, are eager to be vaccinated, also having being in most cases direct witnesses of the tremendous consequences of this infection and the related disease. In our country, as I think and hope is occurring in most countries, the vaccine is quickly becoming available to the residents and is free of charge. From many papers like , we are aware of the challenges of the many vaccines so far proposed or already on the market such as those based on the mRNA platform, but I guess we can be fully confident on the safety and efficacy assessments so far made by EMA and FDA etc. (though long-term monitoring is clearly required, as acknowledged by everybody). This will also be hopefully a way to avoid lockdowns, public health interventions very effective in curbing the outbreak, but coming at huge social and economic prices.”
“Full agreement with the negative reactions to Dr Stoller’s characterization of Covid-19 vaccine. It is a complete nonsense, based on erroneous non-scientific postulations.
Covid-19 vaccines have been demonstrating a high degree of efficacy in stimulating our immune system, and the rate of adverse effects (until now) are similar to other vaccines that have been used for decades.
This being said, there is a difference in the administration of a protein or the respective protein precursors, RNA and DNA. Special attention must be given to the distribution of RNA or DNA to the different tissues and respective half-lives, since we do want to keep the cellular production of non-self proteins for too long. A long-term production could result in sustained auto-immune reactions, including Guillain Barré type syndromes. However, from available data, half-lives of RNA in RNA based vaccines has been shown to be relatively low, and both RNA and cellular produced proteins disappear after a few days. I am still looking forward to learn about the distribution and t/12 of DNA in DNA-based vaccines.”
Posted by: Ronald N. Kostoff | January 09, 2021 at 06:36 AM
So let me get this straight, for decades, the crowd that has been telling us that vaccines do not cause autism; that autism is mostly, if not strictly genetic, now require that we all inject ourselves with genetic material to be considered vaccinated?!
Posted by: annie | January 08, 2021 at 04:52 PM
“The phenomenon of facilitating viral infections by antibodies exists for many viruses including coronaviruses. Instead of behaving as described by classical immunology (protective effect), antibodies allow the virus to penetrate target cells more easily. This mechanism could make a future vaccine against Covid-19 dangerous: this effect was demonstrated in animal tests with SARS1 vaccine candidates in 2003. This facilitation could also explain the second phase of the disease in severely affected patients: the acute inflammatory phase would be due to the facilitation by the high levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies found exclusively in severely affected patients.”
Posted by: ADE | January 08, 2021 at 12:53 PM
I have heard about friends or relatives of people I talk to going into quarantine at home because of contact with a suspected or known Covid carrier. The ones I heard about did it willingly, not wanting to take the viable likelihood of spreading it to others.
What is your plan for such contacts not further spreading the disease? Scotland is in lockdown now to try to get the disease back under control. Forced detention is not necessary if contacts willingly comply. If they do not, what do you think should be done to protect the lives of others? Like the adorable little four-year old Xavier who died of Covid in New York the day after Christmas. He had spent the previous weekend with his grandmother, who developed a mild case of Covid and recovered.
Posted by: Cia | January 08, 2021 at 12:46 PM
“The specific and significant COVID‐19 risk of ADE [antibody dependent-enhancement] should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.”
Timothy Cardozo and Ronald Veazey, ‘ Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID‐19 vaccines worsening clinical disease’, IJCP 29 October 2020, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcp.13795
Posted by: ADE | January 08, 2021 at 12:42 PM
For a few months I was calling it a non-vaccine, the Pfizer/Moderna product, or the vaccine-similar product. Now I’m saying vaccine for simplicity’s sake.
It works out to bring like a vaccine, with one extra step. Instead of injecting an antigen made from a weakened, killed, or partial virus or bacterium, it injects instructions for the immune system to produce this antigen itself. Then in the case of both the vaccine and the vaccine-similar product, the immune system makes antibodies to it, and in most cases it then later recognizes the real pathogen if it arrives and mounts a defense against it, usually killing it, usually at least preventing a serious or fatal case.
If you include things like a sore arm for a few hours at the injection site, you can make it appear as though serious reactions occurred in nearly all cases, when that is not true. There may well be serious longterm adverse reactions, but we haven’t seen them yet. So far there have been relatively few short-term reactions and nearly all of them have recovered.
Israel has vaccinated over 15% of its population with no serious problems so far. Meanwhile, the US has had four thousand deaths a day, the most yet. Medical personnel in LA have been told not to take Covid patients to the hospital if it looks like there’s not much hope. And to not treat oxygen saturation drops to 90-94%, as they usually would, but to wait until it drops below 90%, and then stop administering oxygen when it gets to 90% again. Because they’re running out of oxygen.
Hospitals in many countries, including the US, are in danger of crashing within weeks.
Previously healthy four-year old Xavier died of Covid in New York the day after Christmas. His brothers were waiting for him to open presents. He said he wanted to watch Toy Story 4 and then go home. Then he died. I got something on Nextdoor here by a woman who said she was very sick with Covid, went by ambulance to the hospital but two hours later was told to get out and go home with some anti-nausea pills. She nearly died at home. A private doctor went to her home every day for a week to administer oxygen. Because the hospital did not have room, equipment, drugs, or staff to treat her at the hospital.
So what should we do? Just ignore all these people suffering and dying? I’m not saying anyone should feel obligated to take the vaccine, but I think that’s going to be the answer when enough people take it. But everyone should work out a good plan to protect both himself and others. If not the vaccine or vaccine-like product, then what, and are you willing to do it indefinitely?
Posted by: Cia | January 08, 2021 at 11:37 AM
Welcome to Pharma dystopia concentration camps return.
New York Introduces COVID Forced-Detention Law for Merely SUSPECTED Exposure or "Contact"
Pharma For Prison
Posted by: Angus Files | January 08, 2021 at 10:30 AM
Orwell predicted the corruption of language would occur .. wherein he describes WAR becomes PEACE. LOVE becomes HATE … and … MEDICAL DEVICE becomes VACCINE.
It's easy to manipulate language as the powers that be having been doing it successfully for decades ..it allows our corrupt media to define RIOTERS as PEACEFUL PROTESTORS.
Posted by: Bob Moffit | January 08, 2021 at 08:32 AM