President Trump Calls Vice President Biden "Anti-Vaccine"
AstraZeneca Vaccine On Hold After Serious Adverse Reaction

Transhumanism In The Era of Covid

Dr Carrie MadejNote:  Anne Dachel transcribed a YouTube video below. The channel is controversial. The information? We'll let you decide.  The COVID vaccines are racing down the pike.

###

Dr. Carrie Madej speaks out about COVlD-19 vaccine

(Dr. Carrie Madej, DO is an Internal Medicine Specialist in McDonough, GA and has over 19 years of experience in the medical field. She graduated from Kansas City Univ Of Medicine Bioscience College Of Osteopathic Medicine medical school in 2001. She is affiliated with Southern Regional Medical Center.)

Dr. Carrie Madej, Forest Park, GA

So what do you think about going from Human 1.0 to Human 2.0? And what does that mean? 

Well going from humans as we now know ourselves to Human 2.0 has something to do with transhumanism. If you’re not familiar with that term, it’s about taking humans as we know ourselves and melding with artificial intelligence, kind of like being in The Matrix, if you’ve ever seen that movie. And that may seem kind of cool to you. We might have some  superhuman abilities. Maybe be able to think of something and it happens, maybe have some physical abilities that would be almost superhuman like. That’s the idea, that’s what you see in sci-fi movies.

For myself, thinking about this topic, I’m like well, I have some time, I think that’s many years in the future. However, this question, this idea is now right in this moment. We need to make a decision. I found out we need to make a decision about this because I investigated the proposed COVID 19 vaccine, and this is my alarm call to the world. I looked at the pros and cons and it frightens me. I want you to know about this. You need to be very well informed because this new vaccine is not like your normal flu vaccine. This is something very different. This is something brand new. This is completely experimental on the human race.

It’s not just about being a different vaccine. There are technologies that are being introduced with this vaccine that can change the way we live, who we are and what we are and very quickly. 

Some people, that you might know these names: Elon Musk, who is the founder of SpaceX and Tesla automotive, as well as Ray Kurzweil, who is one of the big wigs of Google. These are self-proclaimed transhumanists. They believe that we should go to Human 2.0, and they are very big proponents of this. 

There [are] a lot of other people. You might know their names. They’re also involved with this, so you should look that up.

I think the easiest way to explain this to you is to go with one of the front runners for the vaccine and go into a little bit of the history and tell you how they want to make the vaccine. I think that will speak volumes. 

For instance Moderna is one of the front runners for the COVID 19 vaccine. You should know that Moderna was founded by a person from Harvard, Derek Rossi, and this researcher actually was successful in taking some modified RNA and be able to reprogram a stem cell in the body and change the function of the stem cell. He actually made it genetically modified. 

He proved that you can genetically modify something by using modified RNA. So they founded the company Moderna on this concept. It’s kind of a new kid on the block, okay? It’s not been around that long. In fact, [Moderna] hasn’t made any vaccine for a human before. It’s made no medicine for a human before. This will be their first run. 

You must know that Moderna was in the news recently because it really fast tracked—like the other companies, it’s fast tracking the vaccine. It’s going from phase one to phase two very, very quickly. In fact, it’s going from phase one to phase three in its experiments from March of this year until currently. That is unbelievable. It usually takes five or six years. How are they able to do this with the safety and efficacy data that we need? 

I want you to know that in phase two…they’re only using between 35 and 40 humans. In Moderna’s test study they only used 45 humans, and with the high dose vaccine group,…100 percent of those people got systemic side effects. One hundred. That’s only in the short side effect profile. In the low dose vaccine [group] 80 percent got systemic side effects. 

We don’t even know the long side effects from that. We would need a lot longer time, right? Maybe years. But we do know, based on previous animal studies using this technology, you can expect possibly increased cancer rates, increased mutant genes, mutagenesis, also increased autoimmune reactions. For instance, in some of the ferret studies, they saw that when the ferret was introduced to the virus that they were trying to protect the ferret from, after the ferret got the vaccine, they actually had an exaggerated immune response. 

It actually hurt the ferret. They had more lung inflammation, more lung fluid, even some problems with their liver. It actually hurt them. They had a poorer response. Those are longer term reactions and that could be seen with this vaccine, but we don’t know the data yet. So it’s not without risk. 

How are they doing this?

They’re actually suggesting to use a platform. Let me just explain how they would administer the vaccine. 

There’s an idea called microneedle platform. This was developed by MIT. They said it could be very easily produced, mass produced. This is why they’re proposing this technology and many millions of vaccines could be made quickly. 

They could also be administered by yourself. The idea is to get a Band-Aid, it looks like a Band-Aid you buy in the drug store. It’s shipped to you through Amazon or UPS or some other shipping service. You take it out of the package, you put it on your hand like this, and then you take the sticker off and voila, you’ve been vaccinated. 

How is that possible?

In this Band-Aid it has little tiny spicules, little tiny needles. This was designed after a snake viper fang bite… So little snakebites. 

In these little tiny spicules, they claim you [won’t] feel it that much, there are little hydrogel. It’s a material called hydrogel. Inside the hydrogel would be a luciferase enzyme as well as the vaccine itself. 

So what is all that?

First of all, you’re getting the vaccine. It’s modified RNA or modified DNA.

Let’s take Moderna, modified RNA. In that modified RNA the idea is that the microneedles would puncture into your cell membrane and this synthetic piece of an RNA, it’s a code for the part of the virus, or they could use a synthetic DNA to code for the part of the virus that would go into your[cell] nucleus. Your body would start transcribing it, it would start reading it and making more of that part of the virus. 

Why would we want to make more of the virus or part of the virus?

The idea is your body would get used to seeing it, would know how to make antibodies and would have an improved T cell response. The idea is then when you saw it in the future, your body would already know how to fight it and it would be a better response. That’s the idea. 

The problem with that is they’re using something, a process called transfection. Transfection is a way that we make genetically modified organisms. I think you know about those fruits and vegetables. They’re not as healthy as the normal, wild type of fruit and vegetable. So possibly you could extrapolate that to a human. If we became genetically modified we would not be as healthy. We don’t have long term studies on this anyway. It’s unbelievable.

 
The vaccine manufacturers have made the statement this will not alter our DNA, our genome. I say that is not true. Because if we use this process to make a genetically modified organism, why would it not do the same thing to a human? I don’t know why they’re saying that. 

If you look at the definition of transfection it’ll tell you that it can be a temporary change in the cell. I think that’s what the vaccine manufacturers are banking on. It’s temporary. 

Or it’s a possibility for it to become stable, to be taken up into the genome. So stable that it will start replicating when the genome replicates, meaning it is now a permanent part of your genome. That’s the chance that we’re taking. So it could be temporary or it could be permanent. We would never know that for years down the road honestly.

So here we go. We’ve got something that can alter our genome. It’s a possibility. And another thing on that, if they’re altering the genome, what would be the effects? I told you previously some of the side effects, but also we need to know that this is a synthetic piece of DNA or RNA, and if it [is] taken up into the genome of a human, it’s synthetic, it’s not from nature. 

If you look at the Supreme Court ruling on synthetic DNA or genes, it can be patented, and patents have owners. So what does that mean for us? What if this gets into our genome? Does that mean that Moderna or the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation or the Department of Defense, all of these people who are involved in the patents are they somehow going to own parts of our genome?It’s a possibility. You need to know that. That’s one part of this delivery system, just one. Now let me go to the next. 

The next part of the delivery system is a luciferase enzyme. They named it, they patented it luciferase. I don’t like that name. Luciferase because it has bioluminescent qualities which means it can produce a light, or has a light source. All of this would be under your skin and you cannot see it. The luciferase is an idea because they want to make sure that you’re vaccinated because they don’t trust medical records, they don’t trust you saying that you got vaccinated. They want to make sure, and they want to make sure that it was successful, a successful transfection, a successful gene modification. 

So when you get the luciferase enzyme, if you have an iPhone or a special app on the iPhone, you can scan over that area and it will give a digital code, a digital imprint, a digital pattern, something that will identify that you were vaccinated. It holds your vaccination record. 

It also gives you an ID, a number, a bar code, a branding, whatever you want to call it, a tattoo. It’s all the same thing. You now become like a product. 

So we have that. 

The third thing I mentioned was hydrogel. Hydrogel is actually an invention from DARPA, the Department of Advanced Research Projects Agency. This is kind of a sci fi kind of a group from the Department of Defense, Pentagon, of the U.S. government. They make these fantastic inventions. So one of them is hydrogel. 

Hydrogel, you can look on You Tube. Profusa is one of the companies, DARPA as well as hydrogel and you’ll find some little two minute clips that they describe. 

So hydrogel is nanotechnology, microscopic little robots, and these little robots actually, I know it sounds crazy, it’s still crazy to me, but it’s possible, okay? 

They can disassemble, reassemble, assemble into and make different things. With this hydrogel, it’s really nanotechnology, so that’s something robotic or something that’s artificial intelligence. It has the ability to connect with artificial intelligence. 

This means that a human can now connect to directly and gather information from our bodies and connect with your smartphone, with the cloud, with some other smart device. Once this is done, this is 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year. 

Think about that. Think about how immediately that could change our privacy. Immediately it could change our autonomy, immediately change our freedoms. 

This can gather data like your blood sugar, your oxygen, your blood pressure. Okay, those sound great. But it also can gather many other things. It can gather, they say, your emotions or your menstrual cycle, your activity, if  you’ve  fallen, your nutrients in your body, if you took medicines. It’s a potential to see if you took illicit drugs. It’s got a potential to see almost anything that goes on in your body. 

And all of this information is going where? That has not been addressed. Who’s protecting this information? What are they using it for? This is really serious stuff, guys. This is all being proposed to being unveiled in the next vaccine. 

The other thing to know is with this nanotechnology hydrogel, artificial intelligence hookup, just like your cell phone, you can send a text message, you can send an email, but also you can  receive them back. So that means we could receive information.

What information would be coming back into us? Would it affect our mood, our behavior? Would it affect how we think, our memories? 

If you haven’t watched the movie Matrix, I think you should. I think there’s some truths in that, in that movie. 

I see so many wrong things with this vaccine, and I see that we are not talking about it in the major media. I feel that these companies are outright lying to us when they say they cannot affect our DNA because by all definitions that they are using this can affect our DNA. 

I want to make this video short because I wanted to get the point across, I wanted you to really do your own research. So know that there are many risks that we’re seeing here.

We really need to know if we really want to go from Human 1.0 to Human 2.0.

Let me also tell you that there’s some major names behind these vaccines. You’re always going to see like the Department of Defense from the U.S. government, sometimes DARPA, like I told you. 

Why is the military involved with our vaccines? 

You see the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation everywhere with this. If you look, you’ll find that name almost always. 

Let’s go back to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Let’s look at the track record. Let’s look at what that man stands for. His family comes from a family of eugenics. What does eugenics mean? Population control, meaning there are too many people on the planet. That’s important to know. He’s been on video stating that he thinks with a very good new vaccine we could get the earth’s population to be decreased by 10 to 15 percent. 

Well, who’s going to stay and who’s going to go? 

And who is he to decide? He doesn’t have a medical background, no epidemiology background, no science background. He’s not a doctor. Software tech. That’s what he has. 

I’d also like you to realize, I always look at who has a vested interest. What are their motivations? What is his motivation, right? We already know his family background. 

What’s very concerning to me is that DARPA, this military agency, as well as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, is very interested in something called “Gene Drive” research or technology, or “Gene Extinction” technology. 

It’s exactly what it sounds like. By using genetic mutations, by use of transfection for instance, you can exterminate an entire species from the planet. They are proposing to use this for mosquitoes, for instance, in Africa. But our world is a delicate ecosystem. Who is saying one species goes? You destroy one species and you could affect an entire ecosystem. 

So when you exterminate an entire species, you will affect an entire ecosystem. It’s a very delicate balance. Who’s to say who’s going to stay and who’s going to go? Who’s got that knowledge and why aren’t we talking about this? And if we can do it to an insect, we can do it to an animal, we can do it to a human. 


I bring this up because if these agencies that are behind the vaccine also stand for that, do you trust them with your health? Do you trust them with your family? Do you trust them with our children? 

The other thing is we’re rushing this to production. What is the motivation behind that? We need to really think about this. 

I’ve also stated in the past that we need to know, at least in the United States, there are mandates passed that make the vaccine manufacturers have no liability, zero liability for any harm done to any human. If people are killed, if they’re hurt, if they’re paralyzed, if they’re maimed for life, it doesn’t matter. You have no recourse, and they still make all their profit. So there is no incentive for them to make it safe anyway.

I also want you to know [about] one of the mandates in the Emergency Preparedness Act that says they can force a vaccine on us. 

They cannot force a vaccine if there is a viable treatment for the COVID 19. I want you to know that doctors around the world are being censored about treatment options for COVID 19 or prevention for COVID 19. If there’s a true treatment or prevention then they can’t force this vaccine on us. 

I want to bring that up because what in the world is the motivation of doing this? 

Is it really [for] the health of all of us? As a doctor, I can’t see how this is in the true health of the entire world. I think there is another motive, another agenda going on. The more I look at this, the more that comes up….

Do you really want to go to Human 2.0? I don’t think it’s the fantasy you see in the movies. We need to come together and we need to unify our voices because people in positions of power taking care of our health are not in our best interest. 

Together we have power. Together, united, our voice is strong. So I encourage you to do critical thinking, do your own research, join groups in your state, go to your state legislature and you tell them no, no to these experiments on humans, no to invasion of privacy, no to censorship.

We are sovereign human souls. We need to take our rights back. …Thank you.  

Anne Dachel is Media Editor for Age of Autism.


Comments

Hera

Kay Fabe,
I think maybe you are being a little optimistic about the potential effects of mRNA?
From the article
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6791314/

"Given the central role of RNA in many fundamental biological processes, including translation and splicing, changes to its chemical composition can have a detrimental impact on cellular fitness, with some evidence suggesting that RNA damage has roles in diseases such as neurodegenerative disorders."
Then this
"Finally, we briefly discuss how chemical damage to noncoding RNAs such as rRNA, tRNA, small nuclear RNA, and small nucleolar RNA is likely to affect their function."

and also this
" Unwanted modifications to the chemical structure of nucleic acids, proteins, lipids, or carbohydrates often result in drastic effects on the ability of these molecules to carry out these functions. Changes to proteins, for example, are known to cause misfolding and aggregation, and the inability of cells to degrade these aberrant protein products has been associated with disease states"

It appears possible that foreign mRNA could effect these things,or be considered "damage" and potentially have all kinds of long term serious health effects, and we do know that no one is studying this vaccine for long enough to be able to tell.( In fact, studying long term effects of any vaccine is almost never done, as anything that occurs after the initial injection is always an unrelated coincidence. As we can see with two? cases of transverse myelitis with the Oxford vaccine, the first one has already been declared an "unrelated coincidence".

I hope that some of those volunteering for the trial are seeing this, and maybe choosing to drop out. I hope the ones that stay in stay healthy.They are brave,but as we know, the long term effects of this kind of damage can be with you for life.

It is also interesting to note that the vaccine trials require anyone participating to neither get pregnant, nor get a flu shot within 30 days of the trial. I wonder why? What kind of side effects can we expect in babies born to those who have received foreign mRNA, or even one of the other trial vaccines?

Benedetta

Kay Fabe m is for messenger, so it messages by making a molecule that carries
codes to be filed away into perhaps the DNA to make proteins? Nothing is for certain here.

Kay Fabe

One advantage of mRNA transfection is that there is neither the need for mRNA to enter the cell nucleus, nor the possibility to integrate into the host genomic DNA . The mRNA in the cytoplasm is degradable and not permanent. Your DNA is not changed.

Not that this is safe. Cellular toxicity is a real threat. Not everyone will react they same way. It may be safe fir 90% but what of the other 10%. Covid is not a real problem for 99% who get it and only 20% have got it. If 100% get vaccinated annually, which will cause more of a problem, COVID or the vaccine

Pogo

Reminds of the Boardwatch magazine article May 1996 (pg44).
Billgatus of Borg. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.
https://archive.org/details/boardwatch-1996-05/mode/2up

Do you think he may be suffering from a psychiatric complex?

Benedettal

Matthew 24; 22 “If those days had not been cut short, no one would survive, but for the sake of the elect those days will be shortened" Jesus said that.

Get rid of mosquitoes by transfection is their goal, and , then turn it around and do the same techniques for this covid 19 vaccine, claiming it is to get the body use to seeing these pieces of virus.

Gates and the rest of the elite ilk are making fun of Christians basically, don't you think?
They know we all have the fear of the mark of the beast, and so they call it the luciferase enzyme.

What is the name that fits people that are so brazen with other's beliefs, that they out right belittle their concerns and fears? Cause I am at a lose for a fitting name for such disdain for a religion that brought us Democracy -- a Republic, western civilization and inventions like Apple that gave Gates his wealth?

,

Grace Green

The reason this sounds so convincing is because it gives a "logical" (in Their terms) explanation for why they would concoct a pandemic when there isn't one, and do a complete U-turn on the effectiveness of HCQ as well as any other treatment for this disease, at the same time as imposing the draconian "laws" which are being introduced in all countries around the world, taking away many people's autonomy. Any vaccine brought forward will be totally unnecessary, almost completely untested, unsafe, and probably have nothing to do with preventing any disease. This also explains why They were so determined to deny that previous vaccines were the cause of any serious conditions, especially autism/ME/dementia. They were setting up this excuse to vaccinate us all with this stuff, and they didn't want people being reluctant to accept it. They probably knew all previous vaccines had nothing to do with preventing diseases.

Bob Moffit

Positively FRIGHTENING …. END THIS MADDNESS IMMEDIATELY …. THESE PEOPLE BELIEVE THEMSELVES GOD …. THE ABSOLUTELY LAST GOD I WOULD WANT TO SERVE IS BILL GATES AND HIS LIKE.

Jill in MI

Holy Crap! This is frightening to see it all laid out like this. Even if only half of this happens, the human race will be forever altered. Not in a good way either. Keep speaking out our truth. Vaccine damage is real. They have ignored our children/young adults now for years as they continued their plotting. Stand together people! The clock is ticking. I feel like it is now or never.

susan welch

Anne. Thank you so much for this transcript. Your tireless efforts really so much appreciated.

It is truly disturbing, even if only a fraction of what she speaks about happens.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)