So this is going to be published in December in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology.

It will be a good read for students down in the bottom basement to do some reading on cold winter days, with a hot cup of some drink. That is if they get a chance out of all their other assignments, and perhaps just perhaps run across it while looking up something else.

A few, those very few coming up in the ranks will know. It takes a lot of people to change things.

That is why the government does so much better in changing hearts and minds, cause they cheat. They decide on something like damaging the ozone layer letting in UV light, and publish everything and often about that.

Of course there is going to be plenty out there that are not up and coming, but have arrived and looking at why the upsurge in so many diseases linked with aluminum overload.

How can we get to see the whole paper ?

"While reaffirming our position in favor of vaccination, we claim that the safety of aluminum-based vaccine adjuvants, like that of any environmental factor presenting a risk of neurotoxicity and to which the young child is exposed, must be seriously evaluated without further delay,

The following information is RE SUBMITTED for today's article as it contains information regarding 'The role of aluminum adjuvants in vaccines raises issues that deserve independent, rigorous and honest science". This information was received from Del Bigtree's excellent site the "HIGHWIRE":
------------------------------------------------------------

The vaccines on the CDC’s childhood vaccine schedule given to babies during the first six months of life include over 3,500 mcg of aluminum adjuvant, a known neurotoxic substance which can damage nerves and kills cells.

The dangers of aluminum based adjuvants have been well documented. Animals injected with aluminum adjuvant, for example, suffer various neurological deficits. In 2017, ICAN even published a white paper summarizing the science which explains how aluminum adjuvant can cause neurological impairment when administered to babies.

Given the foregoing concern, a FOIA request was submitted to the National Institute of Health (NIH) requesting “copies of any human or animal studies involving the subcutaneous or intramuscular injection of aluminum adjuvant relied upon by the NIH to establish the safety of injecting infants and children with aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate or amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate.”

The NIH engaged in an extensive search that included having the following institutes within the NIH search for responsive studies: the NIH Office of Intramural Research (OIR), the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human (NICHD).

But despite their extensive search, the NIH finally conceded that “no records responsive to your request were located.” This admission is incredible. Despite injecting babies with thousands of micrograms of this toxic substance, known to cause cellular and neuronal death, the scientific medical brain trust of this country, the NIH, does not have a single study involving the injection of this substance that would support its safety. This may be because all of the studies involving injection of aluminum adjuvant reflect its dangers.
--------------------------------
IMAGINE THAT .. DESPITE INJECTING BABIES WITH THOUSANDS OF MICROGRAMS OF THIS TOXIC SUBSTANCE .. KNOWN TO CAUSE CELLULAR AND NEURONAL DEATH, THE SCIENTIFIC MEDICAL BRAIN TRUST OF THIS COUNRY, THE NIH, DOES NOT HAVE A SINGLE STUDY INVOLVING THE INJECTION OF THIS SUBSTANCE THAT WOULD SUPPORT ITS SAFETY.