Will Vegans Reject Covid Vaccine that Drains Horseshoe Crabs of Their Blood?
Children’s Health Defense Suing Zuckerberg & The Fact Checkers

Technology In A World of Disabled Children

Boris Johnson at UNBy Anne Dachel

Boris Johnson, UK Prime Minister,  addressed the U.N. in Sept 2019.   He spoke about modern technology with analogies to Greek mythology and historical figures. Will our high tech world free us or enslave us?  Liberate us or control us?

In the midst of this 16 minute speech he managed to slam ‘anti-vaxxers’ as anti-science. (8:15)

“It is a deep human instinct to be wary of any kind of technical progress. …There are today people who are still actually anti-science, a whole movement called ‘the anti-vaxxers’ who refuse to acknowledge the evidence that vaccinations have eradicated smallpox and who by their prejudices are actually endangering the very children they want to protect.

“And I totally reject this anti-science pessimism. I’m profoundly about the ability of new technology to serve as a liberator and to remake the world wondrously and benignly.”

So while the computer age poses threats to our freedom, vaccines are good, vaccines save lives, according to Johnson. No one should reject them.

Actually this man needs to look at the British education system. Things are not good. In 2015 the government announced 27 new special needs schools to be built across England, schools for disabled children who couldn’t be helped in regular special education classes. In 2020 we see the additional of 37 more special schools, with plans for 49 more coming after that.

Johnson needs to look at the shocking numbers in the U.K. In Northern Ireland one in every 24 students is autistic, and 23 percent receive special education help. In Scotland 29 percent of children are considered special needs. (England itself puts the special education number at 15 percent, a low figure that can be explained by the recent scandal showing thousands of special needs students are routinely expelled from school. Thousands more simply don’t get assessments for their disabilities.)

Since Johnson took time out from his U.N. speech on technology to deny that vaccines have dangerous side effects, he should continue his fake reality and deny the fact that more and more of the children he governs are unable to function as children have always been expected to.  

Boris Johnson may be optimistic about the future and doesn’t want anyone excluded from “the wonderful benefits of this technology and the industrial revolution,” but he’s totally oblivious about what will happen to Britain when this disabled generation grows up and becomes dependent on the government for their support and care. Maybe he’ll return to the U.N. if he’s still in office, and address the assembly about it.

 

Comments

michael

John if you found yourself momentarily accepting of Boris, its only because of wind direction and you were up wind from the stench. Don't see the wind changing direction for a while. In addition to the mask, you night need a clothes pin or air freshener.

Morag, Someday I will understand it all but I know we are on the same page.

Morag

Thanks John,not sure what that means.is it ok or not? is it infectious /contagious /airbourne?
Is there a tweetment and oinkment recipie required?

John Stone

Morag

I think you have quintessential Boris - the literary dexterity is his own as is the conceit, although this time last year I preferred him to the posturing crew from the left who wanted to crawl out of the Brexit mandate, convinced of their incredible rectitude as they defied democracy.

Morag

Political leadership based on "Spam Valley" Principles.
A ship without a rudder, and a ship without a sail, but the coldest thing in winter is a shirt without a tail!
The free lunceon club .Do they eat farmed salmon sandwiches?
Oh dearie dearie me, "Garde Loo" A Prime Minister doing his business on the United Nations front lawn !
Did he write that "Speak" all by himself ?or perhaps it was his top polital advisor before he decided it was acceptable to drive 40 miles?or so to Barnard Castle, wife's birthday ,also to check his eyesight issues with covid 19.
The acute training and capacity deficiency sure is capable of dropping a No 2, from a great height
straight on to No 10's front door step, nae problem at all !

The numbers of people needing support is truly shocking ,but Age of Autism remains a solid, well grounded and valuable resource service for families .
See --- www.helensandersonassociates.co.uk
HSA /Person -centered/Personalisation/Training /Consultancy .

"Spam Valley Principles" example
NHS Private Funding Initiative [ PFI] Big mortgages for new NHS facilities new hospitals etc with huge intrest repayments for the private sector . No, or very little cash left over, after paying the mortgage to buy enough bed pans tae go round .
Hospitals and Community Resources Canteens, can only afford to offer "Spam sandwiches" as a food and nutrition support service !
See www.brewdog.com >barnardcastle-eye-test.
Barnard Castle Eye Test Beers /BrewDog .
Sells Short-sighted beer for tall stories.

John Stone

Obviously, Johnson was trying to promote himself as an honest broker or gate keeper in the face of global industrialisation and interests, but whether he believes it himself or not - he probably does - he’s not remotely credible. Perhaps the most telling line was about the freebies for international diplomats at Michelin star restaurants (they all look on frosty faced, as if to not appreciate the joke). I recall first sighting him on TV c.1986 when he was President of the Oxford Union - a monumentally pompous performance which was to do essentially with the entitlement of the upper classes (I have never heard it enunciated so blatantly before or since), it was jaw-dropping. Whether he has subsequently shown skills in communicating with lesser personages I am sure what we saw at the time was the core Boris.

John Stone

Jenny

Except that as we see he was peddling this last year.

Shelley Tzorfas

Great Michael! "Treacherously Naive."

Jonathan Rose

Gosh, Pogo, Boris sounds like Antifa, only much more posh.

Grace Green

Jenny Allan,
Interesting you should say that. We have been seriously wondering whether, while he was in hospital with "the virus", without his knowledge or consent he was given something which has turned him into a Stepford prime minister!

Pogo

Bob
Education system? Boris used to be a member of the Bullingdon Club whilst at Eton School that went around wrecking restaurants, public houses, and college rooms… Obviously, he hasn’t changed much. Just set his sights higher. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullingdon_Club#Reputation

Angus Files

Boris is Prime Minisster(whatever that nodding head role means these days) on a Brexit ticket.Once a bufoon always a bufoon ,bufoonry policy based on fear not science are we anti-fear also-I think so..

Pharma For Prison

MMR RIP

michael

Shelley--How about "treacherously naive"?

Shelley Tzorfas

You can look at his face and realize by his age that he did not grow up in a world where 1 in 5 children were Neurologically impaired. You can surmise that he likely had maybe 10-12 or less vaccines, not the 70 that kids have today and Growing. You can tell that he did NOT grow up in a world where 1 in 35 kids had Autism nor 1 in 20 boys. Its obvious that 1 in 285 kids were Not struck with cancer when he was a little boy. Most importantly is that he is Naive or downright treacherous for not understanding the Science of Aluminum and how it enters the brain via Vaccines and causes Alzheimer's disease, how Formaldehyde is causing Cancer, or how aborted Human Fetal Cells are creating Tumors. This is not "Science," rather it is a "PHARMACEUTICAL SEANCE!"

Patrick

Oh, WE are anti-science just because we are aware that no vaccine has ever been tested for safety or effectiveness. Okay

Bob Moffit

"Actually this man (Boris Johnson) needs to look at the British education system. Things are not good. In 2015 the government announced 27 new special needs schools to be built across England, schools for disabled children who couldn’t be helped in regular special education classes. In 2020 we see the additional of 37 more special schools, with plans for 49 more coming after that.'

As the wise man once said: 'THERE ARE NONE SO BLIND AS THOSE THAT REFUSE TO SEE".

Johnson continued: There are today people who are still actually anti-science, a whole movement called ‘the anti-vaxxers’ who refuse to acknowledge the evidence that vaccinations have eradicated smallpox and who by their prejudices are actually endangering the very children they want to protect."

How is it possible for a country's leadership to IGNORE the ever-increasing deterioration of children's health over recent decades … and … not demand all efforts .. most importantly that long overdue vaccinated v unvaccinated study that WOULD PROVE JOHNSON'S CONFIDENCE IN VACCINES IS VALID? Such as study may explain WHY so many children now qualify for SPECIAL NEEDS?? Too often unchallenged claims that numerous studies of unvaccinated exist are FALSE .. as evidenced by recent info from Del Bigtree regarding recent CDC admission of no vaccinated v unvaccinated studies:


"On July 29, 2020, after months of false claims and objections, the CDC finally conceded that it could not find a single study comparing health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated children and that it “has not conducted a study of health outcomes in vaccinated vs unvaccinated populations.”

Parents, doctors, and scientists have, for decades, demanded that the CDC compare the health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated children. This is, in part, because as the increase in the CDC’s childhood vaccine schedule over the last 30 years from 8 vaccine injections to 50 vaccine injections (plus 2 injections during pregnancy) has occurred in lockstep with the increase in the rate of autoimmune, developmental and neurological disorders in children from 12.8% to 54%.

The demand for this study has grown so great that even the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in 2013 issued a report stating that the CDC could and should perform this study, explaining that it “is possible to make this comparison [between vaccinated and unvaccinated children] through analyses of patient information contained in large databases such as VSD [the Vaccine Safety Datalink paid for by the CDC].” Incredibly, the CDC then spent hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars to have scientist, such as Dr. Stanley Plotkin, write a white paper, published in 2015, on how to conduct this simple study.

To find out if this study recommended by the IOM 7 years ago has been done, our legal team, headed by Aaron Siri, submitted a FOIA request to the CDC on June 26, 2020 demanding: “All documents in the CDC’s possession which compare the health outcomes of children that have received vaccines with children that have never received any vaccines.” That same day the CDC sent a letter stating it had placed this request on a “complex processing queue” because the CDC’s office processing this request “expects to receive and review voluminous records in response to your request.”

The CDC then issued another letter on July 6, 2020, this time objecting to the request as “Broad” and “Vague” because it “lacks the specificity needed to assist the agency [to] retrieve the information with a reasonable amount of effort,” thereby again indicating there are so many studies it cannot possibly compile them all. Our legal team sidestepped the CDC’s objection by responding that the CDC need “only provide the first twenty journal articles the CDC can identify which are responsive to the request.”

Incredibly, the CDC responded on July 9, 2020 by making yet another objection stating: “Your request for ‘…the first twenty…’ is not sufficiently quantified to allow the agency to conduct a reasonable and adequate search.”

Our attorneys were now about to have even more fun with the CDC. On July 13, 2020, they responded to the CDC by stating: “To clarify, we are seeking any responsive journal articles up to a quantity of 20 articles. … We have [therefore] now limited the request to up to a maximum of 20 journal articles in the CDC’s possession which compare the health outcomes of children that have received vaccines with children that have never received any vaccines.” Our attorneys also resubmitted the original request again with slightly different wording to make sure the CDC had no escape hatch.

Well, by August 3, 2020, it appears that the CDC had had enough and knowing that we will sue them, as we have done in the past, they capitulated. Behold their response in which they concede in black and white that they had nothing:

A search of our records failed to reveal any documents pertaining to your request. The CDC has not conducted a study of health outcomes in vaccinated vs unvaccinated populations.

It is incredible that this simple study has not been published. Or maybe the CDC did conduct but not publish the study because it did not provide the results they wanted. Either way, the next time someone tells you that it is a “myth” or “hoax” to claim that the CDC has never conducted a vaccinated versus unvaccinated study, you can put this CDC response in their face."

INDEED .. BORIS JOHNSON HAS EXTRAORDINARY TECHNOLOGY TO SCIENTIFICALLY CONDUCT SUCH A COMMON SENSE STUDY .. HE HAS THE DATA, THE RESOURCES, THE TECHNOLOGY … HE LACKS ONLY THE WILL TO DO IT. THE QUESTION IS "WHAT IS HE AFRAID OF?????

BN

Boris is totally onboard with Bill Gates and his plan to jab us all. It will be interesting to see if the health workers fall in line with the flu jab ,they have been a little resistant in the pass to join the party. Today on London Real they are showing Plandemic at 5pm this might be interesting.

Jenny Allan

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/jul/24/boris-johnson-says-anti-vaxxers-are-nuts-free-winter-flu-jabs
Boris-Johnson says "anti-vaxxers are nuts."
Some of us think the Covid-19 virus has addled our Prime Minister's brain!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)