June Reports From Britain on Special Education Surge
The Healthy American on Church Singing Ban

Why the Bill Gates global health empire promises more empire and less public health

Bill-gates_reutBehind a veil of corporate media PR, the Gates Foundation has served as a vehicle for Western capital while exploiting the Global South as a human laboratory. The coronavirus pandemic is likely to intensify this disturbing agenda.

By Jeremy Loffredo and Michele Greenstein The GrayZone.com

President Donald Trump’s announcement this July of a U.S. withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO) set into motion a process that will have a dramatic impact on the future of global public health policy – and on the fortunes of one of the world’s richest people.

The US abandonment of the WHO means that the organization’s second-largest financial contributor, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, is soon to become its top donor, giving the non-governmental international empire unparalleled influence over one the world’s most important multilateral organizations.

Bill Gates has achieved a hero-like status during the pandemic. The Washington Post has called him a “champion of science-backed solutions,” while the New York Times recently hailed him as “the most interesting man in the world.” Gates is also the star of a hit Netflix docu-series, “Pandemic: How to Prevent an Outbreak,” which was released just weeks before coronavirus hit the U.S., and was produced by a New York Times correspondent, Sheri Fink, who previously worked at three Gates-funded organizations (Pro Publica, the New America Foundation, and the International Medical Corps).

The tidal wave of mainstream media praise for Gates during the Covid-19 era has meant that scrutiny of the billionaire and his machinations is increasingly prevalent on the farright of the political spectrum, where it can be dismissed by progressives as the conspiratorial ravings of Trumpists and Q-Anon quacks. 

But beyond the public relations bonanza about Gates lies a disturbing history that should raise concerns about whether his foundation’s plans for resolving the pandemic will benefit the global public as much as it expands and entrenches its power over international institutions. 

The Gates Foundation has already effectively privatized the international body charged with creating health policy, transforming it into a vehicle for corporate dominance. It has facilitated the dumping of toxic products onto the people of the Global South, and even used the world’s poor as guinea pigs for drug experiments.

The Gates Foundation’s influence over public health policy is practically contingent on ensuring that safety regulations and other government functions are weak enough to be circumvented. It therefore operates against the independence of nation states and as a vehicle for Western capital.

“Because of the Gates Foundation, I have watched government after government fall in its sovereignty,” Dr. Vandana Shiva, a scholar and founder of the India-based Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology, told The Grayzone.

Saving the world?

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the largest private foundation on Earth, reporting over $51 billion in assets at the end of 2019. Bill Gates says his foundation spends a majority of its resources “reducing deaths from infectious diseases,” and through this philanthropy, he seems to have bought a name for himself as an infectious disease expert. Continue HERE.


Ronald N. Kostoff

“Her paper was retracted because it was correct:”
The technical/biomedical literature is no less fake news than the mainstream media and, for topics of commercial, political, and military sensitivity, may even be greater. I addressed this issue in sections 2A and 2F of a recent monograph (https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/62452), as follows:
2A1d. Relation of wireless radiation health and safety research to publishers’ conflicts-of-interest
Some journal publishers of articles concerning health and safety effects of wireless radiation have similar conflicts of interest. Many journals are not independent from government or industry sponsorship, in whole or in part, directly or indirectly. This conflict-of-interest is addressed further in section 2F. These journals control the review process by which articles are selected for publication, and it is extremely easy for a journal to select articles for publication that will align strongly with the promotional interests of the organizations or people that contribute to their revenue stream. These direct or indirect journal sponsors include:
• Promotional organizations that contribute directly to the journals;
• Promotional organizations that contribute directly to professional societies that sponsor many of the ‘leading’ journals;
• Individuals who receive funding from industrial or governmental organizations promoting wireless radiation technology and who
o contribute directly to the journals and/or
o contribute to professional societies that sponsor many of the ‘leading’ journals
Anyone who has read thousands of wireless radiation journal article abstracts on health and safety would have little problem in identifying those journals that rarely publish results opposing the promotional objectives of government and industry (see Slesin [2006] for allegations of possible bias in one journal’s publication patterns of microwave-induced genotoxic results). Equally, they would have little problem in identifying those authors or author institutions that even more rarely publish results opposing the promotional objectives of government and industry. If we take into account the credibility asymmetry between studies whose results 1) support the promotional objectives of their sponsors or 2) do not support the promotional objectives of their sponsors, then a much different picture of the wireless radiation health and safety research literature emerges. Many of the so-called conflicting results disappear when credibility weightings are applied, and the true serious adverse effects resulting from this harmful technology are shown in detail. The reader should keep this credibility asymmetry in mind when evaluating the myriad adverse health effects shown in sections 2D and 2E.
2F2. The Role of Conflicts-of-Interest in Lack of Full Consensus
At this point, the reader would be well-advised to re-read section 2A1 on conflicts-of-interest relative to wireless radiation health and safety studies.
These conflicts pollute the well of knowledge relevant to health and safety, and are the largest contributor to mis-informing the public about the serious adverse health and safety impacts from wireless radiation.
For example, studies have shown that industry-funded research of wireless radiation adverse health effects is far more likely to show no effects than funding from non-industry sources [Huss et al, 2007; Slesin, 2006; Carpenter, 2019]. Studies in disciplines other than wireless radiation have shown that, for products of high military, commercial, and political sensitivity, ‘researchers’/organizations are hired to publish articles that conflict with the credible science (aka ‘product defense’ companies (https://www.fastcompany.com/1139299/manufacturing-doubt-product-defense), ‘hired guns’, etc), and therefore create doubt as to whether the product of interest is harmful [Michaels, 2008, 2020; Oreskes and Conway, 2011; Ong and Glantz, 2000; McGarity and Wagner, 2008; Walker, 2017].
Section 3.2.2 in a 2016 article on under-reporting of adverse effects of myriad substances in the biomedical literature [Kostoff, 2016] shows clearly the collusion of the USA government and industry (and academia in some cases) in concealing harm of toxic substances (whose continued use is of importance to one or both organizations). These examples, and many others in the large USA government-industry candidate pool from which they were selected, show that
government-industry collusion to suppress adverse effects from technologies is endemic across technologies; it is not an aberration, but may be closer to the norm for technologies that are sensitive commercially, militarily, and politically.
A comprehensive article in The New Yorker magazine (https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/02/10/a-valuable-reputation?verso=true) details the travails that Prof. Tyrone Hays had to endure from industry in his quest to show that the herbicide Atrazine contributes to severe adverse effects. While the European Union banned the use of Atrazine almost two decades ago, the EPA has allowed its use to continue in the USA.
Finally, Appendix 6 lists study references showing effects of industry funding on research outcomes for myriad research disciplines (mainly within biomedical). What these references don’t show (for the most part) is how industry convinced the regulators to incorporate the results of these studies in setting the lax regulations we see in practice today [e.g., Kostoff, 2018a]. Given that the sponsor and performer incentives of those studies are no different from the sponsor-performer incentives of wireless radiation health effects studies, there is little reason for expecting less concealment of adverse effects in the wireless radiation studies. Given the magnitude of revenues at stake for wireless radiation technology implementation, there is much reason for expecting more concealment and/or neutralization of adverse effects in the wireless radiation studies!



Great Article well written and illuminating.


Gary Ogden

Jonathan Rose: Sad to say, scientific publishing has become as corrupt as government-funded science. Dr. Malcolm Kendrick recently wrote a blog post about this. We are living in a horror show. The nation we grew up in, and whose principles we lauded and trusted has ceased to exist. In some parts of California it is easy to ignore the mask mandate and still purchase food, but it brings tears to my eyes to see so few people openly rebelling, even putting the stupid things on small children, who have no risk at all from the current "corona virus." This is child abuse. What sort of warped view of other people, of health, of germs will they develop as they grow up? I am simply horrified at what the future portends. Where are you, Mr. President?

Jonathan Rose

Bob, if I may plug the work of my best friend, relevant to your point, Gayle DeLong found a relationship between the HPV vaccine and ovarian failure. Her paper was retracted because it was correct:


Bob Moffit

As I said … POPULATION CONTROL is and has been Gates life-long PRIORITY and it appears he is succeeding according to this article … titled RESEARCHERS WARN OF JAW DROPPING CRASH IN GLOBAL FERTILITY RATE:


The research suggests that almost every country on the planet could have shrinking populations by the end of this century, with 23 nations projected to see their populations halve by 2100.

The research indicates that the total global population will peak at 9.7 billion in 2064, and then naturally shrink back to 8.8 billion come the end of the century.

John Stone


Not new, but it is frustrating to see `Gates posing everywhere as the saviour of humanity, when the enslavement of it is his real objective.

Ronald N. Kostoff


"Wow, so Bill Gates is using Africans as guinea pigs, and dumping dangerous drugs on them"

Nothing new about that. This type of experiment continues the sordid history of how high-risk drugs, vaccines, and other treatments have been tested by (mainly) the developed countries. For the most part, the test subjects domestically have been selected from groups unable to give truly informed consent. These include prison inmates, mental institution inmates, orphanages, schools for the disabled, military, etc. The overseas test subjects have been obtained through a process known as 'off-shoring'. Arrangements are made with officials in foreign countries (typically developing countries) to conduct clinical trials, where the safety oversight is weakened with respect to the safety requirements in the developed countries. Basically, it is the poor and dispossessed of the world (in Franz Fanon's words, the Wretched of the Earth) who are risking their lives for drugs and vaccines that only the residents of the richer countries will be able to afford. See Appendix 1 of (https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/62452) and Chapter 9D3 of (https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/53714) for examples of who suffers and who gains as a result of these 'experiments'.


Angus Files

Susan you`re far more diplomatic than me but like your choice of words.

Pharma For Prison


susan welch

Nice one, Angus. Will add to my list. My favourite so far is 'This mask is as USELESS as the government that mandated it' My second favourite is 'Under Duress'.

Angus Files

Interesting read Laura thanks. I just ordered my mask via ebay at the weekend as they are now mandatory if entering a shop but weren’t during the so called height of the covid ding dong.

Well my black mask has white writing with
right across the front offit!
Right up em!

Pharma For Prison


Laura Hayes

Another compelling read:



Excellent summary of sporadic specific breathtaking atrocities .
Vandana Shiva france 24 YouTube
Bill Gates is continuing the work of Monsanto -Dr Vandana Shiva YouTube October 2019

Isn't she just fabulous ,who wouldn't want to give this woman a big warm hug and a cuddle of thankful appreciation for all the hard work!

See Uk Column News, 13 July 2020 .
Covid pandemonium , the politically immature, getting spoon fed and wet nursed by the scientifically insecure ?
Apparently no health and safety risk assesment of prescriptive masks /face coverings mandates available ? as perhaps not completed at all ?
Is that not criminal negligence? equivalent to combustable insulation cladding on Grenfel Tower Appartments . Look how they tried to drop" yon smelly stuff" on the Fire Brigade, from a great height as well . Politicians are accountable and responsible for their policies and mandates .

Something inside so strong -with Lyrics YouTube by Labi Siffre 1978

Jonathan Rose

Mwalimumtoro: You have a point there, perhaps I was too dismissive. As I indicated in my last message, we should communicate this to everyone, and that would certainly include BLM. So let's do that and see how they respond.


Trump cuts off WHO yet gives Gates GAVI 2 billion and GAVI is one of WHO’s top supporters. Lol

Also Trump offered Gates the job of White House Science and Technology Adviser (turned down)

By public health Gates means reducing the viral load on the planet. To them the most harmful virus is us. The people. Not all people, just those who have IQ’s under 140 or are unable to do useful skilled labor. Thats probably 60% of us, maybe more.

COVID is taking out the elderly. Children's Vaccinations no doubt have diminished future adults fertility rates and life expectancy. Its our turn next, no doubt after the experiments in The Global South


Prof. Rose,

Didn't you mean to say, "maybe we should try to communicate this with the Black Lives Matter movement?

Jonathan Rose

AoA readers should repost this article on all other online forums they belong to. This could be the breakthrough moment for our cause, given that the country is now so focused on racial issues. What kills me is that many innocent people (professors, journalists) have been unfairly smeared as racists -- while the biggest and richest racist is glorified by the media. Judging from the comments that follow the usual puff pieces on Gates, I would estimate that 90 percent of the American people loathe him, and would be very receptive to our rebuttals.

Angus Files

Tweedledum and Tweedledee AKA Fauci and Gates can’t give their lethal vaccines away another episode of through the looking glass where the population is forced into lockdown martial law removal of basic human rights .. Fauci`s “new normal freedoms” to be restored only when, another untested dangerous vaccine is pumped out into the population to be tracked and controlled by nano particles in vaccines and the rest.Drain the swamp Trump said, it seems to be overflowing just now.

A super article thanks.

Pharma For Prison



Beyond question, IMHO, this is one of the most important posts I've seen in the few short years since I found AoA.
I urge ALL to read it VERY CAREFULLY, and consider how this fits together into the biggest of the "big pictures"....
In the Bible, in Timothy, it is said that "....love of money is the root of all evil."
Truly, Bill Gates is one of the most evil men on Planet Earth right now.....

Jonathan Rose

Wow, so Bill Gates is using Africans as guinea pigs, and dumping dangerous drugs on them, and working hand in glove with a racist eugenics outfit?! I bet Black Lives Matters is courageously speaking out against this, right? Right?

elaine dow

Bill Gates is a menacing globalist and proclaimed in the media to be a savior to our children's health, he is just the opposite. His father was a leader in Planned Parenthood. He wants to control population, decide who is essential and who can be expendable. He has been playing "god" with our children's lives, vaccines he has promoted in Africa and India did great harm to the children. Fauci is also in the same camp. Their medical milipulation of our children's health in the name of saving lives? The biggest lie in this country and the world.

Laura Hayes

Excellent article. Worth the very long read. Thanks for running it here on AoA.

Bob Moffit

There is so much damaging information in this article .. it should be a book .. regarding Gates' demonic exploitation of under developed countries .. instance after instance .. where Gates, public health authorities (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies used poor people as nothing less than "experimental guinea pigs" upon which they vaccinated millions with disastrous results .. and .. to date have NEVER BEEN HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY.

The following paragraph is ABSOLUTELY FRIGTHENING:

"Gates has nearly monopolized the realm of public health policy, both nationally and internationally. “Fauci and I are in constant contact,” he has proclaimed, referring to the face of the U.S. Covid response, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Anthony Fauci."

God help us. By the way … this LENGHTY article did not once mention Bill Gates well known priority is POPULATION CONTROL … having proudly boasted that VACCINES would be a great way of controlling the population ….. which makes sense .. GIVING HIS VACCINES IN UNDER-DEVELOPED COUNTRIES ARE CONTROLLING POPULATIONS.

Knowing Gates priority is POPULATION CONTROL …. I would be very concerned that Gates has recommended BLACK AMERICANS BE THE FIRST TO GET COVID VACCINES WHEN THEY FINALLY ARRIVE AT "WARP SPEED".

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)