Action Alert: Voting on HB 5044 Vaccine Bill Monday February 24 in Hartford
Action Alert: Call Virginia Legislators to Stop HB1090

More Parents Delaying Vaccines Per ABC News Report

SlowNote: This week, Connecticut and Virginia are fighting against the removal of vaccination rights.  Note this timely article from ABC News that as many as 1/3 of families are delaying vaccines.  I took note of this point, they are not delaying for the first born, but for second or later kids. How many of us have done the same thing? We saw our firstborn children have adverse reactions and life altering effects, and so decided to slow down or stop with our second child?  Of course the article blames misinformation, which is to say NOT swallowing the propaganda from the CDC. In reality, Moms put a lot of research into their kids health and safety, and playground conversations can get real, real fast. We're speaking out about what happened to our older children without fear. And the young Moms see with their own eyes, classrooms full of kids with chronic health issues. We live in a nation that usually RUNS to medicine and pills as the first line of defense. We are not medicine averse here in the USA. So to slowdown or stop vaccinating takes careful thought and painful decision making. From this we know.

###

From ABC: One-third of children between the ages of 19-35 months don't receive vaccines on time, leaving them vulnerable to preventable infectious diseases, and their complications, a new study finds.

The study revealed that 63% of children received vaccines on time before the age of three, as per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines, while 23% limited the number of shots per visit or skipped at least one vaccine. Another 14% were not compliant with guideline recommendations, according to data used from surveys at Emory University from 15,059 children nationwide showed.

The CDC recommends children be vaccinated against 14 illnesses in their first three years of life; Chickenpox (Varicella) Diphtheria, tetanus, and whooping cough (pertussis) (DTaP) (4th dose), Haemophilus influenzae type b disease (Hib) (4th dose), Measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) (1st dose), Polio (IPV) (3rd dose), Pneumococcal disease (PCV13) (4th dose), Hepatitis A (HepA) (1st dose).

Vaccine delays were more common in children who moved across state lines, were not first-born, lived in the Northeast, were black or multi-race, and below the poverty level, according to the study.

"Some families work with their pediatrician to come up with a modified immunization schedule (vs. CDC schedule) or they will split up the combination vaccines, which ultimately ends up being more of a disservice to your newborn because of more overall injections given. Delaying vaccines, delays the body's ability to develop an immune response, relying on immunity from rest of community" Dr. Shaliz Pourkaviani, who is a bicoastal neonatologist, said.    Read more here.

Comments

cia

Bob,

The CDC link went to a page with the vaccines listed for the second year, not the first, and it had in next to the last place: Hepatitis B (HepB) (3rd dose between 6 months and 18 months)

cia

All reliable experts agree that it is very dangerous to give vaccines to babies. Their immune system hasn't developed enough to respond to vaccines as desired and they build up NO immunity to pertussis, for example, with the first vaccine given at two months old, and little or none with the second dose at four months old. While starting at two months rather than five or later more than doubles the incidence of asthma at seven years old (Manitoba study). Giving vaccines that young confuses their immune system, priming them for allergic and autoimmune disorders. And the aluminum etc. goes straight to their brain, and is stored there permanently. Yes, you need to protect babies from germs, you need to keep them OUT of daycare, and if you breastfeed them, you give them all the antibodies to everything the mother has ever been exposed to. (Except pertussis, if she got the vaccine before the disease, she cannot give any immunity to her baby.) Babies need to gradually develop their immune systems by everyday exposure to the millions of germs around us all the time, but try to protect them from symptomatic diseases. No child should get vaccines before the age of two or three, so his immune system has time to develop normally during that time before it's reprogrammed by vaccines.

Even if you HAVE to put them in daycare, you should think about the Hib series, but you don't need to give it before four months old, because almost everyone has immunity to haemophilus and pneumo meningitis by the age of five through subclinical exposure: that means that women give placental immunity to them to their babies in the womb and breastfeeding strengthens and prolongs this protection. Another triumph of Nature.

cia

I replied to a shill at that site who was screaming that measles killed a hundred million people just in the twentieth century with facts about 90% of children recovering from measles even in Africa, Dr. Peter Aaby's Senegal study showing that natural measles lowered their mortality in the subsequent four years to one-fifth that of children who didn't get measles, and the measles mortality in the US in 1960: 99%, three to four million cases a year, 450 deaths, usually in the malnourished or with preexisting conditions, and what does ABC do? See below, I cut and pasted it. No wonder the legacy media are dying. Dangerous, child-killing propaganda is all they're good for, that and licking pharma boots.

We are unable to post your comment because you have been banned by ABC News. Find out more.

Bob Moffit

One more thing.

Dr Pourkaviani .. "Delaying vaccines, delays the body's ability to develop an immune response, relying on immunity from rest of community" Dr. Shaliz Pourkaviani, who is a bicoastal neonatologist, said."

Silly me .. according to Dr P .. VACCINES are the reason a child's body develops an immune response .. who knew how critical vaccines are in developing a child's immune response .. apparently those of us who received 3-6 vaccines in childhood were lucky to have survived … absent another 13 or so vaccines to develop our immune systems.

cia

I just put up several more comments at this ABC site, and they've marked me as getting automatic moderation. I'm saving their disqus identification number as proof that they were there, they should have been permitted as reasonable contributions to a vaccine discussion, but, as is usual, the site only permits a few short comments critical of vaccines and an overwhelming number of shill comments. My last one:

ciaparker2 Brian • a minute ago Hold on, this is waiting to be approved by ABC News.
Many of my comments are being taken down. I've saved them and their disqus identification next to share. Hard to argue with the truth, isn't it?
http://disq.us/p/27isv29

Bob Moffit

"The CDC recommends children be vaccinated against 14 illnesses in their first three years of life; Chickenpox (Varicella) Diphtheria, tetanus, and whooping cough (pertussis) (DTaP) (4th dose), Haemophilus influenzae type b disease (Hib) (4th dose), Measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) (1st dose), Polio (IPV) (3rd dose), Pneumococcal disease (PCV13) (4th dose), Hepatitis A (HepA) (1st dose)."


Did I miss something … the HEP B vaccine is NOT listed .. I thought the HEP B was given within hours of birth .. another dose at 2 months … another prior to 12 months.

This from google: "AAP Recommends That Infants Receive First Hepatitis B Dose Within 24 Hours of Birth. ... Newborns can acquire this infection at birth if a mother is infected with hepatitis B virus. Hepatitis B vaccine administered after birth is highly effective in preventing newborn infection."

Help me out here .. am I wrong?

cia

I put up several comments there, the first was simply removed and one of the others has been sent to moderation. That's why so many parents are delaying or refusing vaccines, it's becoming clear to more every day that the media is simply lying to us, with most of the commenters on their articles paid to lie as well. Another odd thing or maybe just to be expected from these *** is that I was unable to use my original disqus account for comments after the first one, I put in my email address and password, even did two of their little picture quizzes, but it said the Capcha didn't work, and I was unable to sign in. I was able to get in using another account. But I was not able to access my Disqus profile to see if my first comment was still there: i had to spend some time trying and eventually got to it when I found a comment from several years ago the link to which still worked.

Yeah, ABC, why COULD it he that so many parents don't BELIEVE you jerk-offs who don't give a tinker's damn about children's health, just about your industry pay-off?

Removed
It’s not just the vaccine ingredients like aluminum, which IS extremely dangerous and should be avoided whenever possible. Or the preservatives, antibiotics, formaldehyde, antifreeze, or remnants of many different animal proteins from the cell culture the vaccine pathogens were cultivated on, although all are dangerous and highly antigenic (often provoke allergies and autoimmune disease, now in over half of American children for this very reason). The really big elephant in the room is that vaccines HAVE to elicit an inflammatory response to force the production of antibodies. Excipients like aluminum force the immune system to react to the weakened pathogen it’s with, notice it by mounting an inflammatory response designed to continue for as many years as possible. But even without excipients, vaccines are foreign substances which bypass the filtering and advance warning systems in the respiratory system and GI tract. Many people have very alert, proactive immune systems which react with so much vigor to the invasion of a vaccine on its territory that the inflammatory response is acute, causing encephalitic brain damage, especially to the language and social center of the brain (autism) or it initiates allergic or autoimmune reactions to substances resembling vaccine ingredients.
This results in autism now in one in 36 American children, with a cost of trillions of public money for lifetime care, seizure disorders in one in twenty, ADHD, asthma in one in nine, peanut allergy in one in fifty, and all the other allergic and autoimmune diseases.
Right now there is little state- sponsored housing for the autistic. Here in Missouri eighty million a year would be necessary to meet current demand, but last July the state legislature slashed funding to seventeen million, citing the tsunami-like soaring of autism numbers in young adults like my autistic 19 year old who had severe reactions to two vaccines. In her generation it was one in 150 with autism, and the state can’t handle them. But several vaccines were introduced since 2000 and the result is an autism rate of one in 36 in young children now. So there will be four times the current number to care for ten years from now.
So parents have to decide which risk they’d rather take: the extremely small risk of dying or being disabled by a vaccine-preventable disease or a much larger one from the vaccines on the recommended list. I’d say to consider the DT series after the age of three, polio if it comes back here, and the Hib and Prevnar series after four months old for babies not breastfed and who have to be in daycare. Babies should be sheltered at home. Measles and pertussis are no longer dangerous diseases except for a few babies. Measles, mumps, rubella, flu, rotavirus, chickenpox, and hep-A are beneficial diseases for children past infancy to get, training the immune system and even giving benefits like substantial cancer prevention for life.
The present push for mandates is one planned and promoted by pharmaceutical companies, one of the most powerful lobbyists, for decades, and now it’s bearing fruit. But it will bear a lifetime of health problems for the majority of those who forced to get all the recommended vaccines. And that is what millions of parents are fighting tooth and nail.
antibiotics, formaldehyde, antifreeze, or remnants of many different animal proteins from the cell culture the vaccine pathogens were cultivated on, although all are dangerous and highly antigenic (often provoke allergies and autoimmune disease, now in over half of American children for this very reason). The really big elephant in the room is that vaccines HAVE to elicit an inflammatory response to force the production of antibodies. Excipients like aluminum force the immune system to react to the weakened pathogen it’s with, notice it by mounting an inflammatory response designed to continue for as many years as possible. But even without excipients, vaccines are foreign substances which bypass the filtering and advance warning systems in the respiratory system and GI tract. Many people have very alert, proactive immune systems which react with so much vigor to the invasion of a vaccine on its territory that the inflammatory response is acute, causing encephalitic brain damage, especially to the language and social center of the brain (autism) or it initiates allergic or autoimmune reactions to substances resembling vaccine ingredients.
This results in autism now in one in 36 American children, with a cost of trillions of public money for lifetime care, seizure disorders in one in twenty, ADHD, asthma in one in nine, peanut allergy in one in fifty, and all the other allergic and autoimmune diseases.
Right now there is little state- sponsored housing for the autistic. Here in Missouri eighty million a year would be necessary to meet current demand, but last July the state legislature slashed funding to seventeen million, citing the tsunami-like soaring of autism numbers in young adults like my autistic 19 year old who had severe reactions to two vaccines. In her generation it was one in 150 with autism, and the state can’t handle them. But several vaccines were introduced since 2000 and the result is an autism rate of one in 36 in young children now. So there will be four times the current number to care for ten years from now.
So parents have to decide which risk they’d rather take: the extremely small risk of dying or being disabled by a vaccine-preventable disease or a much larger one from the vaccines on the recommended list. I’d say to consider the DT series after the age of three, polio if it comes back here, and the Hib and Prevnar series after four months old for babies not breastfed and who have to be in daycare. Babies should be sheltered at home. Measles and pertussis are no longer dangerous diseases except for a few babies. Measles, mumps, rubella, flu, rotavirus, chickenpox, and hep-A are beneficial diseases for children past infancy to get, training the immune system and even giving benefits like substantial cancer prevention for life.
The present push for mandates is one planned and promoted by pharmaceutical companies, one of the most powerful lobbyists, for decades, and now it’s bearing fruit. But it will bear a lifetime of health problems for the majority of those who forced to get all the recommended vaccines. And that is what millions of parents are fighting tooth and nail.


ciaparker2 Todd • a minute ago Hold on, this is waiting to be approved by ABC News.
TB disappeared from the US without a vaccine ever being in routine use. Smallpox stopped being dangerous in the US after the outbreak in 1897, good thing, as most people had stopped taking the extremely dangerous, ineffective smallpox vaccine. The polio vaccine was good, although it used to be that nearly everyone got the disease, but less than one percent was paralyzed by it.
Already the numbers of those enrolled in medicine and law at universities has drastically fallen because so many of those born since the vaccine epidemic began in 1990 have been brain-damaged to the extent that they just don't have what it takes. A real tragedy since we already can't take care of the millions of autistic we have now, and the number will quadruple in the next ten years: one in 150 in my autistic daughter's generation born in 2000, now up to one in 36. You do the math. It will cost billions to care for the ones we have now for life, with millions fewer taxpayers and competent adults to do it.

https://abcnews.go.com/Health/parents-delaying-giving-vaccines-children-study/story?id=69141494&fbclid=IwAR31lF-TSvSiMvIUwYDMUfGDXF_UCeh90eQ5f17kMXDcSvjnClNDgF5-jl8

Shelley Tzorfas

Around 33 & a third of parents have seen issues with family members or their 1st born child after getting copious amounts of Aluminum, Cancer Causing FORMALDEHYDE, Polysorbate, Cocker Spaniel Kidney Cells, ether, peanut oils leading to anaphylactic shock to foods-Many schools no longer allow a peanut and some schools no longer allow a parent to bring cupcakes to school for fear of a nut which further separates children from their parents. The news however portrays an entirely different story. Do they believe the public is Deaf, Blind or Dumb?

Laura Hayes

P.S. to Dr. Pourkaviani,

Millions upon millions of parents worldwide reporting the terrible, often horrific, events that followed their children’s vaccinations are reliable data.

What isn’t reliable (or ethical) are the doctors who dismiss, deny, and malign these parents and their suffering children, and who refuse to report, warn, and act to immediately stop these vaccine atrocities.

It would certainly do you, your newborn patients, and their families well to remember your oath to “First, do no harm.” You might also try opening your ears, eyes, and mind to the many parents and individuals of all ages who are trying to educate and warn you and your colleagues as to the decimation vaccines leave in their wake.

Here are two presentations to begin with:

“Why Is This Legal?”

https://www.ageofautism.com/2018/11/why-is-this-legal-presentation-on-vaccines-by-laura-hayes.html

“Vaccines: What Is There to Be ‘Pro’ About?”

https://www.ageofautism.com/2016/12/vaccines-what-is-there-to-be-pro-about-laura-hayes-to-weston-a-price-foundation-conference.html

Laura Hayes

Dr. Pourkaviani,

Please share with us your “reliable data” that vaccines are safe (meaning they don’t cause harm to recipients, or to others who come in contact with recipients, or to the offspring of recipients), effective (meaning they induce permanent, lifetime immunity in the recipient to the infection being targeted, they don’t fail, they don’t cause that which is worse than the targeted infection, they don’t induce harm in the recipient that wasn’t present before, they don’t eliminate the transfer of immunity from mother to child, and they don’t alter the natural course of the infection being targeted making it ultimately more dangerous to humans), and needed (meaning they are the only and best means available to protect, maintain, and enhance one’s health).

The article says this doctor is a bicoastal neonatologist. Parents on both coasts, beware.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)