Keith Kloor is another journalist who has attacked RFK Jr. He was also an early adopter of the attack on Andrew Wakefield. In fact, timing and language indicates some coordination with Brian Deer's 2011 attack on Wakefield.

Recently USRTK uncovered Kloor's behind-the-scenes coordinating with two supposedly independent agricultural scientists. In his article "Why Vaccine and GMO Denial Should be Treated Equally," Kloor disparages RFK Jr and vaccine safety advocates (and, of course, GMO skeptics). If we suspect Kloor is a crypto Monsanto employee, why should we credit him on vaccines? More importantly, why should we believe any of the journalists slamming vaccine safety advocacy? It's not a far reach to conclude that they are all bought and paid for.

https://usrtk.org/our-investigations/keith-kloor-the-agrichemical-industrys-favorite-writer/ :
"Emails from August 2014 show Kloor offering messaging advice to Dr. Folta and another source, Dr. Karl Haro von Mogel, the media director of the GMO promotion group Biofortified. Kloor asked them to critique an article by Carole Bartolotto, a dietician who had written critically about GMOs. The emails show that Kloor edited the comments and suggested ways to strengthen the messaging: 'My advice: keep the language as neutral and judgment-free as possible. You’re aiming for the fence-sitters, who may well be turned off by language that comes off as heavy handed.'

Kloor posted the Bartolotto critique on his Discover blog and described Drs. Folta and von Mogel as 'two scientists who receive no funding from the biotech industry.' Emails later revealed that, just a few weeks earlier, Monsanto had agreed to fund Dr. Folta’s promotional efforts for GMOs; and, the previous summer, Dr. Folta planned to visit Hawaii to lobby against pesticide restrictions on a trip organized and paid for by a pesticide industry trade group (Dr. von Mogel was also included on those emails). Kloor’s article still appears on the Discover website without updates or corrections."

http://www.keithkloor.com/?p=13583 "Why Vaccine and GMO Denial Should be Treated Equally"

Keith Kloor, Jan 6, 2011: So will this news of “elaborate fraud” by a champion of the debunked vaccine-autism connection give pause to the the anti-vaxxers, who regard Wakefield as their hero? And quoting Fiona Godlee, “….Instead, although now disgraced and stripped of his clinical and academic credentials, he continues to push his views.”

Immunization Action Coalition introducing Brian Deer’s “Secrets of the MMR Scare” of Jan 6, 2011: 'MMR doctor' planned scheme to make millions from his health scare Andrew Wakefield, the disgraced doctor who claimed a link between MMR and autism, planned secret businesses intended to make huge sums of money, in Britain and America, from his now-discredited allegations. The Wakefield scheme is exposed today in the second part of a BMJ series of special reports, "Secrets of the MMR scare," by investigative journalist Brian Deer. Last week we revealed the scientific fraud behind the appearance of a link between the vaccine and autism. Now Deer follows the money.

Just to say as an insight into our age RFKjnr’s recent book ‘American Values - Lessons I Learned from My Family’ is also an important read. He’s old enough to remember his uncle Jack as well as father, their attitudes and distaste particularly for the CIA, its dirty tricks and special operations, its war-mongering. Of course, it has been ignored, buried by the MSM.

Oh, Politico.
The wall hiding regulatory insufficiencies and vaccine injuries is coming down.

"... this wall will fall. For it cannot withstand faith; it cannot withstand truth. The wall cannot withstand freedom."
President Ronald Reagan, West Berlin, Brandenburg Gate, 1987

Hans and Angus,

Thank you both for your words of support :)

Anyone whom believes that hundreds of thousands of American school children losing access to an education is not a major 2020 campaign issue is living in a bubble. Anyone whom believes that half of all American citizens having to live with (and pay for) a disease they will have their entire lives, is not a major 2020 political issue, is living in a bubble. Anyone whom believes that the measles is more of a concern to parents than the life long debilitating chronic illness our children are suffering from, is living in a bubble. RKK Jr does not need the media, does not need party, and (respectfully) does not need all family (crimeny, we’re the Irish, pick up a rock and you’ll find plenty of kin to spare) to burst this toxic bubble. Run Bobby Run!

A "Breath of Fresh Air" on the subjects from Robert Kennedy Jr. only they "Are taking your breath away....by not allowing your voice and Millions of parents voices to be seen and heard.

In my list of publications (including Politico) that have used the "disgraced and discredited" meme when referring to Andrew Wakefield and his case series, I meant to include the one in Mother Jones by Stephanie Mencimer in 2012. It should have been at the top of the list, being one of the earlier ones.

Mencimer is the journo who inspired my very abbreviated list. I had just watched "Hot Coffee" and liked it. In it, Mencimer said that journalists had done a bad job covering personal injury stories like the famous McDonald's hot coffee suit. Hooray, I thought, here's someone who might have written something original about Andrew Wakefield. Um, no...but now we know she can take dictation.

Mother Jones, Stephanie Mencimer, 2012: In 2000, he [Dan Burton] held a circus-like hearing in which he provided a very high profile platform for the now entirely disgraced British doctor Andrew Wakefield, who helped spawn the myth that vaccines cause autism….As Wakefield’s now-discredited, fabricated data started to raise questions in the medical community, Burton defended him....

Lets take it to The Hague

As the Nuremberg Code is being violated how about we and Dell Bigtree et.al., all approach
the Human Rights Watch with a view that this abonomation gets taken to The Hague Institute.

On their front webpage:

“Human Rights Watch was founded in 1978 as “Helsinki Watch,” when we began investigating rights abuses in countries that signed the Helsinki Accords, most notably those behind the Iron Curtain. Since then, our work has expanded to five continents. We investigated massacres and even genocides, along with government take-overs of media and the baseless arrests of activists and political opposition figures. At the same time, we expanded our work to address abuses against those likely to face discrimination, including women, LGBT people, and people with disabilities. When families victimized by war crimes found no justice at home, we championed international justice and international courts. While we rely on in-person interviews, our research methods have also changed with the times, and today we use satellite imagery to track the destruction of villages and city blocks, and we mine big data for patterns in arrest rates or the deportation of immigrants. Everything we do circles back to our commitment to justice, dignity, compassion, and equality.
(Emphasis mine)

https://www.hrw.org/about-us

On the front webpage of The Hague Institute:

”The Hague Institute seeks to improve the evidence-base of policies implemented by governments, international organizations and businesses.” (Emphasis mine)

https://www.thehagueinstituteforglobaljustice.org/the-hague-approach/philosophy/

How do we take this forward from here. If the Hague turns out to have been neutered as well, then Elon Musk had better get a move on with his plans for the colonization of Mars – we’ll supply the colonizers. The first vessel ought to be named Mayflower II. We are one, we are many.

With grace, RFK, Jr., has given truth.

What exactly is “vaccine safety", and should the pursuit of it be the top priority given today’s urgent and dire circumstances, as described in this article?

If one were to remove all of the unsafe ingredients in vaccines, which ingredients would be left that are safe to inject?

Procedurally, and in light of Forrest Maready’s logical and frightening conclusions, how would vaccines be administered to any newborn, infant, toddler, or young child safely, without triggering the innate, sex-specific stress responses that he chronicles in his book, which can lead to serious, lifelong harm, not to mention to grave distress?

How would it be determined, in the event a vaccine could be made to be "safe", and in the event it could also be delivered to intended age groups "safely", that it would be "safe" to interrupt, disrupt, taint, and derail our God-given immune systems, versus letting them develop naturally, without numerous invasive medical procedures, and without the use of pharmaceutical products?

We must pick our battles carefully and wisely. Do we want to battle for “safe vaccines”, or do we want to battle for an immediate end to vaccine mandates, an immediate and full return of individual and parental rights with regard to medical decision making, an immediate repeal of the 1986 Act, and an immediate moratorium on each and every vaccine as not one has been tested or approved properly or ethically?

Defining end goals is of paramount importance.

We have more than enough evidence, in the incomplete and fraud-ridden vaccine package inserts alone, not to mention in the ever-declining health, development, well-being, fertility, and longevity of the children and young adults in America post-vaccination, to declare with certainty that vaccines are not only not safe, but they are also not advantageous, health-inducing, working as claimed, ethical, economical, or wise to be administering. Thus, the battle must be to immediately ensure that individuals and parents have the unfettered right to decline and refuse one, some, or all vaccines, as they see fit, without any government interference, coercion, cost, or penalty, as that is the only way to protect oneself and one’s children from the known, and unknown, dangers, including death, of vaccines.

Why, in the supposed “land of the free”, is it so difficult and so controversial to demand our rights to bodily sovereignty for ourselves and our children when it comes to the invasive, improperly-tested, risk-laden, to the point of terribly dangerous and death-inducing, medical procedures known as vaccines?

And as for this quote from the article:

“People will vaccinate when they have confidence in regulators and industry.”

Not going to happen for a growing number of us who recognize and understand vaccination for the barbaric, child-abusive, health-destroying, communication-stealing, independence-robbing, evil practice that it is. Nor will a growing number of us ever place our trust in regulators or industry.

Not allowing RFK to respond to article in Politico magazine is predictable of almost ALL major media outlets .. magazines, newspapers, television .. now efforts underway to "censor" social media outlets .. twitter, google and such.

I consider it EVIDENCE the "by any means necessary" pharma industry KNOWS it cannot withstand open, honest discussion/debate on the subject of vaccines … the industry KNOWS it would lose any such open discussion/debate .. leaving them no alternative but to take "any means necessary to prevent such an honest open debate from happening".

The ONLY place where pharma industry can win is within the COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION .. because in that "court" pharmaceutical industry financial power rules … this "court" was once ruled by the tobacco industry and for decades upon decades prevailed .. hopefully the same result that ended "big tobacco's" financial power over the "court of public opinion" will happen to "big pharma" as well.

As Jesse Jackson was famous for saying ….. "KEEP HOPE ALIVE".