Susan Welch,

My elation ended and my bubble burst at the 30 minute marker for the link you provided. To read why, see my comment posted in the Comments section here:

https://www.ageofautism.com/2019/09/leigh-dundas-press-conference-on-an-investigating-sb276.html#comments

Hera,

I think the problem is always going to be that most severe vaccine reactions are not instantaneous, so it's easy to deny the connection with vaccines. Maybe they'll come up with diagnostic tools to pinpoint the connection, but it may be a long time since it's so easy for the elite to just steam roll children and their families and profit from it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fj7CYtDZjTU&feature=youtu.be

Fred, this is especially for your info. However, I recommend it to anyone who has not already seen it. It is amazing and inspiring.

Susan,

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/california-broadens-investigation-doctors-issuing-questionable-vaccine-exemptions-n1025741

Interesting article on "Children's Health Defense" today: "Discussing the plateau in white ASD prevalence in the mid-2000s, the two researchers point out that it could 'suggest a stabilization of the environmental drivers of ASD…followed by a new or increasing environmental insult after 2007.'"
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/related-disorders/autism/autism-spin-versus-autism-trends-rising-prevalence-in-black-and-hispanic-children/

Perhaps it's a coincidence, but there was an increase in recommended pediatric vaccines in 2006:

"The changes to the previous childhood and adolescent immunization schedule, published January 2006, are as follows:

The new rotavirus vaccine (Rota) is recommended in a 3-dose schedule at ages 2, 4, and 6 months. The first dose should be administered at ages 6 weeks through 12 weeks with subsequent doses administered at 4--10 week intervals. Rotavirus vaccination should not be initiated for infants aged >12 weeks and should not be administered after age 32 weeks.

The influenza vaccine is now recommended for all children aged 6--59 months."

Fred,
I'm curious. Which pediatrician would make more money, the one who takes a thorough medical and family history of a patient and determines that the risk of vaccine injury/damage is too significant and therefore writes a medical exemption for some or all vaccines? Or the pediatrician who adheres to the AAP 'well' baby schedule and requires visits and immunizations at birth, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months, 2 years...through adolescence?

Master Frederick: First, Google is a major part of the propaganda and social control operation. I suggest avoiding it like the plague. Second, there is no such thing as a bogus vaccine medical exemption. Both Pan, in the hearings, and Brown, in his signing statement, made it clear that with SB 277 the criteria for medical exemptions in California were being expanded. The only criterion now is the medical judgement of the child's physician. Third, again to bed without your supper. You've been a very bad boy.

Susan,

If you Google it you'll find at least 4 California physicians under investigation for writing bogus vaccine exemptions, including Bob Sears.

Grace,

Why would an AV doctor write a bogus vaccine exemption? Because it increases business with those privileged, affluent California moms.

Should I repeat my 2nd post or have I been censored?

Governor Newsome is tweeting out a video regarding gender inequality with Melinda Gates as one of the faces of equality?! This feed should be flooded with the sexist, misogynistic, examples of vaccine injury denial.

https://mobile.twitter.com/GavinNewsom/status/1166159394666700801

Del Bigtree said there should be a scientific exemption because there is plenty of science showing the danger of vaccines and their ingredients from the polio vaccine with Dr. Bernice Eddy all the way to modern times with Dr. Christopher Exley, Professor Christopher Shaw, Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic, Dr. Romain Gherardi, Dr. Theresa Deisher, et. al. Why wait until a child is injured or killed before you can get a medical exemption? The science already shows vaccines are unsafe. In California, they used to have a religious exemption and medical exemption. Then they added the personal exemption, and we thought that was great. But they did it so they could quietly take away the religious exemption without pushback. Then they could take away personal exemption later which is harder to fight constitutionally than a religious exemption. But Laura is right. Parents should have informed consent which none of us had and abolish mandates! And there should be a scientific exemption!

Frederick Chopin,
So what happens when the state board gets it wrong? They force vaccines on someone against medical advice, and the victim ends up with seizure disorder, or chronic autoimmune diseases, if not something worse,like paralysis ,( Guilliame barre). Surely at the least, the board needs to be financially responsible for the long term care and harm they cause? No poor victims having to sue the government and wait 7 or more years, while the board waltzes on damaging other children , oblivious.. The people who force the vaccines should have to bare the consequences of their apparent belief that they have the ability to forsee with 100% accuracy who will get a vaccine injury.

I personally would like to see them also have to give up their own time ( no more weekend vacations,for example, ) if the child they injured has uncontrollable seizure disorder.. The should be required to help actually care for the child they maim.
That is why we have basic medical rights ( Nuremberg code of informed consent.)The people with actual skin in the game get to make the decisions.
At the very least, we need to push that the board will be financially responsible for any adverse event that occurs after they demand vaccination or take away the right to an education.

Fighting for SB276 is like slaves fighting for masters who give them an extra ration of rice or one less whipping per month, versus fighting for their freedom. It’s not to say the extra ration of rice or one less whipping wouldn’t be an improvement of their current situation, but it doesn’t address or solve the actual problem, that of enslavement. Similarly, we Americans are presently enslaved to the dictates of Pharma and their growing legion of paid minions, which includes lawmakers, government regulators, doctors and nurses, and mainstream media. We must break free from their tyrannical stranglehold. SB276 will not accomplish that.

What we need to be fighting for is the immediate elimination and forever banning of vaccine mandates, and for the immediate and full return of individual and parental rights to make any and all medical decisions, as the individual or parent sees fit, without any government interference, coercion, cost, or penalty.

We need to stop fighting on the battlegrounds that the vaccine profiteers continue to create for us, and instead fight the battles that need winning, and fast.

Doctors have NO business and NO right being in charge of our healthcare and medical decisions. Those decisions belong solely to the individual and to the parent. Period.

It's about curbing AV physicians' ability to write bogus medical vaccine exemptions in California.