New York Decision Weaponizes and Demonizes Healthy Children
Flint Children "Lucky" It was Water

New York Attorney Sussman to File Appeal in Denial of Stay to Repeal of Religious Exemptions

Kent legalThank you to John Gilmore of Autism Action Network for this update to the dire situation in New York state.

NY: Sussman to file appeal in denial of a stay on enforcing the repeal of religious exemptions

Michael Sussman, the lead attorney in F.F. v. State of New York, a case challenging the repeal of the religious exemption from vaccine mandates to attend school in New York, released the following statement this morning.

"We have decided to file an appeal with the Third Department in Albany from Judge Hartman's decision denying a stay of the enforcement of the religious repeal. As you know, we believe the repeal violates several constitutional rights. I expect to be in Albany on Tuesday or Wednesday this week presenting our legal papers. I will keep those interested apprised of the status and share our legal papers on Facebook as I have done before. Best week possible to all."

Comments

annie

Vaccination is a religious ritual. It is not rooted in evidence based science. There is ample scientific evidence of the harm that 73 doses of vaccine can cause a child under the age of eighteen. There is evidence of vaccinated people becoming infected. There is evidence of vaccine strain measles being circulated. No vaccine is tested against a true placebo. People who engage in the practice of vaccination are not practicing science, they are engaging in a faith-based, propagandized, ritual. Our constitution does not allow for a state religion. Not everyone whom uses the religious exemption does so maintain the right to practice a religion, many do so to maintain the right to abstain from religious participation. Arguments against the repeal of the religious exemption (I believe) should be made in this vain because it affords the opportunity to bring scientific evidence to the court.

Laura Hayes

Gayle, and All,

Based on the 1 in 36 Autism rate in children in the U.S. (already outdated, and no doubt more dire now), and based on the routinely-used rate of 4,000,000 babies born annually in the U.S.:

9,259 children will be diagnosed with Autism each and every month in the U.S., with no end in sight, only projected increases.

That's 111,111 children per year, and growing.

Multiply that number by $3-5 million per child over the cost of a lifetime (a lowball estimate, to be sure).

Next, remember that it WON'T be the perpetrators paying the $3-5 million per person price tag for vaccine-induced Autism...it will be parents and taxpayers.

A reasonable person would ask why states en masse don't go after Pharma directly to foot the bills they are causing. For those who have yet to figure this out, it is because the majority of state and federal legislators are put into office by Pharma dollars, and are then beholden to do their evil bidding, with state legislators mandating their heinous vaccine products, while federal legislators ensure that they remain liability-free for their vaccine products. And our Pharma-sponsored mainstream media makes sure all these legislators stay in line, supporting those who do, and denigrating those who don't.

And for those who are not yet aware, Autism has become big business. Behavioral vendors in the state of CA who provide services for those with Autism are being bought out right and left by investors expecting to reap huge profits from Autism. Sickening, just sickening, to contemplate and know that this lifelong, devastating, communication-stealing, independence-robbing disability, that never needed to happen, and that could be prevented, has become big business with big profits for a growing number of people (for all but the victims and their families).

Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.

Cia

I think the bedrock of our case is the human right to free and informed consent to any medical procedure, let alone one which everyone admits might have disabling or fatal consequences. They say the risk is very low, we know it is very high, but the principle is the same regardless. We ought to frame our objections citing the Nuremberg code and the Helsinki declaration.

While the scientific objections are extremely powerful, the bottom line is that no one in a free society may be forced to alter his body's functions, by vaccines or anything else.

This abject terror of measles is whipped up by the pharma industry (obviously), but it surprises me that judges are willing to violate every tenet of human rights and compel people to submit to autoimmune disease and neurological destruction. That judge, like everyone else, has the truth about vaccines (and measles, etc.) at her fingertips. She is choosing to placate the powerful pharma lobby. These court proceedings will eventually have a place right up next to the Salem witch trials.

Gayle

I can't believe there are 37,435 children with autism in New York! I have an adult son with autism and I would like to know how many adults in New York have autism. This situation is outrageous and society will never be able to support so many people with autism. We desperately need research into finding the necessary CURE for this devastating condition for the sake of all of us suffering families. We need this research NOW!

Dan Fergo

This link will bring up the NYS Special Education Information and Reporting Services,
State and District Data Summaries of Special Education Data;
http://www.p12.nysed.gov/sedcar/state.htm

Scroll down a little to the section
Number of NYS Children and Youth with Disabilities Receiving Special Education Programs and Services as of:
and in the School-Age Student Reports: you can select Statewide totals.

For 1996 there were 3,416 students with Autism and for 2016 there were 37,435 with Autism.
http://www.p12.nysed.gov/sedcar/goal2data.htm#1996

John Stone

Bob

Quite right.

John

Bob Moffit

As long as our community must rely upon private lawyers to argue our case against MANDATORY VACCINE POLICIES .. in civil courts in various States .. we have little chance of succeeding on protecting special "exemption" rights .. such as "religion".

There is only ONE EXEMPTION GUARANTEED US BY THE US CONSTITUTION AND WORLD COURTS .. THAT EXEMPTION IS PHILOSOPHICAL .. BOTH CONSTITUTION AND WORLD COURTS AGREE THAT INDIVIDUALS HAVE A "HUMANITARIAN RIGHT" TO EXERCISE 'INFORMED CONSENT" .. DECIDING FOR THEMSELVES IF ANY VACCINE IS WORTH THE KNOWN AND RECOGNIZED RISK ASSOCIATED WITH ALL VACCINES.

Where are the 50 US State Attorney Generals on this issue … either the people in THEIR STATE HAVE A RIGHT TO 'INFORMED CONSENT" OR THEY DON'T ..EITHER WAY THE ATTORNEY GENERALS HAVE THE OBLIGATION TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS OF THEIR CITIZENS FROM THE OVER-REACH OF FEDERAL REGULATORY AGENCIES WHO HAVE ESTABLISHED VACCINE POLICIES THAT VIOLATE THE "INFORMED CONSENT' OF THEIR CITIZENS.

Protecting our "philosophical right" to dissent from mandatory vaccines should be based entirely on SCIENCE .. with the moral caveat of forcing healthy children to survive the RISKS of vaccines .. to protect the health of immune compromised children who cannot be vaccinated. Where is the MORAL/EHICAL CIVIL RESPONSIBILITY in forcing healthy children to assume the known risks of vaccines the unfortunately immune compromised will not have to RISK?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)