Christine

It would be relatively easy - although obviously getting practically harder - to have a vaxxed/unvaxxed study: the more convoluted a study gets the less useful it is. They keep on smashing the basic principles of logic to get the results they want. I think they have a whole collection of flawed methods, not just one. It also tells you something that a properly conducted study would probably show gross population harm: you could have a lot of hidden harm before it would register statistically. In the case of the Mawson study it is a very small but decently conducted study, with dramatic results. Once again the critics put logic into reverse - they argue that the study is too small to be significant. Well that would be true if it did not have strong results, but it does. Of course, it also means you need bigger studies but it is very bad signal which needs following up. There was a very similar instance where the Indian government suppressed the results of a study of a home grown rotavirus vaccine product on the grounds it was too small, but the fact that even a small study showed harm should have been a signal. On wonders how often this happens in trials.

How long can this corrupt conspiracy between the CDC and vaccine industry continue to be IGNORED by DOCTORS, LEGISLATORS, MEDIA, ACADEMICS, AMA, AAP, ON AND ON. Everyone one mentioned in the list of those IGNORING the corruption between the CDC and vaccine industry are as GUILTY AS THEY ARE … INDEED … MAYBE EVEN WORSE THAN THE CONSPIRATORS THEMSELVES.

Recent lawsuit found J&j GUILTY of promoting long term use of opioids .. deliberately mis-informed doctors and patients of the KNOWN dangers of becoming ADDICTED to opioids over time. J&J was fined a few million dollars .. and … I have heard of ONE doctor who has been sentenced for LIFE .. having been convicted of "selling' million of opioids to ANYONE who sought the pills. That's not enough … DOCTORS have a responsibility to INFORM THEMSELVES of potential dangers in the drugs they PRESCRIBE .. it is not enough to simply say … "I was told they were safe and effective". THEIR PATIENTS RELY UPON THEIR DOCTORS .. AND .. THEIR DOCTORS OUGTH NOT RELY SOLELY ON DRUG MANUFACTURERS WHOSE HIGHEST PRIORITY IS 'SELLING THE DRUG" …

We are long past the time for DOCTORS TO QUESTION THE SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF THE VACCINES THEY BLINDLY ADMINISTER TO THEIR PATIENTS .. THEY OWE THIS SELF-EDUCATING RESPONSIBILITY TO THEIR PATIENTS … TIME FOR DOCTORS TO JOIN THE RISING VOICES OF PARENTS AND MANY OF THEIR PROFESSIONAL COLLEAGUES DEMANDING THE CDC CONDUCT THAT LONG OVERDUE VACCINATED V. UNVACCINATED STUDY .. THEY OWE IT TO THEIR PATIENTS AND EVERY CHILD PRESENT AND IN THE FUTURE.