Failure of Mumps Component of MMR and Male Infertility
Note: Mother Nature can be cruel. And she can be kind. She can also be smart. Many years ago, I met with a physician who talked about how the "schedule" of childhood diseases laid down the immune system needed for a strong adulthood. There are five viral rash diseases: measles, rubella, chicken pox, roseola and erythema infectiosum - which you and I call "Fifth Disease." It's number 5. We have vaccines against measles, rubella and chicken pox. And so the media goes wild with every case. We do not have a vaccine for roseola or Fifth disease - to which I was exposed while pregnant with my first child. And so you never hear of cases of these diseases.
Before sanitation, antibiotics, modern healthcare, and nutritional support, many children did not survive their toddler years. Graveyards are full of weathered markers that bear witness to the power of these diseases. What happens when adults contract diseases that have been "put off" by childhood vaccination? Robert Kennedy Jr discusses the problem with adult onset mumps and male fertility problems as a result of vaccine failure.
###
Merck's MMR vaccine, when it fails to protect against mumps, puts males at risk of infertility MMR Vaccine’s Poison Pill: Mumps After Puberty, Reduced Testosterone and Sperm Counts
Across the country, frenzied legislators are responding to the pharmaceutical industry’s orchestrated fear campaign around measles by seeking to impose further mandating of Merck’s measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine. Although ongoing mumps outbreaks involving thousands of at-risk adolescents and young adults completely dwarf the number of measles cases, no one is covering the mumps story—because it will expose the fact that Merck has been in court for over eight years due to scientists blowing the whistle on Merck’s fabrication and falsification of the effectiveness of the mumps component of its MMR vaccine. Instead of punishing Merck for its chicanery, legislatures are rewarding the company by making it impossible to refuse Merck’s profitable vaccine, subjecting a generation of American children to the risk of serious complications from mumps infection at an age that nature never intended.
When younger children experience mumps, the virus is relatively harmless; infected children often exhibit no symptoms. When mumps strikes adolescents or adults, on the other hand, the infection can cause far more serious adverse effects, including inflammation of various organs (brain, pancreas, ovaries and testicles)—as well as damage to male fertility.
Inflammation of one or both testicles (a condition called orchitis) occurs in approximately one in three post-pubertal men who get mumps and can contribute to sperm defects and subfertility as well as impairing the function of cells that produce testosterone. An estimated 30% to 87% of men with bilateral orchitis induced by mumps experience full-blown infertility—a major cause for concern given the significant declines in male fertility observed over the past several decades. Thus, it appears that Merck’s vaccine, instead of protecting children, not only delays onset of disease to later age cohorts but has the potential to cause serious and permanent injury.
Merck and mumps vaccines
Let’s look at a quick history of mumps and MMR vaccination in the United States. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) licensed Merck’s initial mumps-only vaccine in 1967. In 1971, Merck introduced its first combination MMR vaccine, followed by the MMR-II vaccine in 1978 (which repurposed the rubella component) and the MMR-plus-varicella (MMRV) ProQuad vaccine in 2005. Since the initial 1967 vaccine, Merck has enjoyed a unique monopoly position in the U.S. market for mumps and MMR vaccines, with combined sales of MMR-II and ProQuad bringing in over $720 million in 2014 alone. Merck consistently places in the top five pharmaceutical companies globally, and the market valued its stocks at a seven-year high as of late 2018.

This article represents Part I of a two-part series on mumps. Part II will delve further into the mumps vaccine’s spillover effects on fertility.
By Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Chairman of the Board, Children’s Health Defense
Across the country, frenzied legislators are responding to the pharmaceutical industry’s orchestrated fear campaign around measles by seeking to impose further mandating of Merck’s measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine. Although ongoing mumps outbreaks involving thousands of at-risk adolescents and young adults completely dwarf the number of measles cases, no one is covering the mumps story—because it will expose the fact that Merck has been in court for over eight years due to scientists blowing the whistle on Merck’s fabrication and falsification of the effectiveness of the mumps component of its MMR vaccine. Instead of punishing Merck for its chicanery, legislatures are rewarding the company by making it impossible to refuse Merck’s profitable vaccine, subjecting a generation of American children to the risk of serious complications from mumps infection at an age that nature never intended.
When younger children experience mumps, the virus is relatively harmless; infected children often exhibit no symptoms. When mumps strikes adolescents or adults, on the other hand, the infection can cause far more serious adverse effects, including inflammation of various organs (brain, pancreas, ovaries and testicles)—as well as damage to male fertility.
Inflammation of one or both testicles (a condition called orchitis) occurs in approximately one in three post-pubertal men who get mumps and can contribute to sperm defects and subfertility as well as impairing the function of cells that produce testosterone. An estimated 30% to 87% of men with bilateral orchitis induced by mumps experience full-blown infertility—a major cause for concern given the significant declines in male fertility observed over the past several decades. Thus, it appears that Merck’s vaccine, instead of protecting children, not only delays onset of disease to later age cohorts but has the potential to cause serious and permanent injury.
Merck and mumps vaccines
Let’s look at a quick history of mumps and MMR vaccination in the United States. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) licensed Merck’s initial mumps-only vaccine in 1967. In 1971, Merck introduced its first combination MMR vaccine, followed by the MMR-II vaccine in 1978 (which repurposed the rubella component) and the MMR-plus-varicella (MMRV) ProQuad vaccine in 2005. Since the initial 1967 vaccine, Merck has enjoyed a unique monopoly position in the U.S. market for mumps and MMR vaccines, with combined sales of MMR-II and ProQuad bringing in over $720 million in 2014 alone. Merck consistently places in the top five pharmaceutical companies globally, and the market valued its stocks at a seven-year high as of late 2018.
In order to score the lucrative MMR monopoly, Merck needed to satisfy the FDA that all three components of the combination vaccine could achieve 95% efficacy, but the mumps portion was bedeviling. In fact, as alleged in a lawsuit filed by two senior Merck scientists in 2010 under the False Claims Act, the company has known since the late 1990s that the mumps component of the MMR is “far less” than 95% effective. A 2005 study published in Vaccine estimated the effectiveness of mumps vaccination to be closer to 69%, and the authors noted that their results were consistent with other studies.
The two whistleblowers assert in the lawsuit—which is reportedly headed to trial sometime this year—that Merck has “willfully and illegally maintained its monopoly” through “ongoing manipulation” and by “representing to the public and government agencies a falsely inflated efficacy rate for its Mumps Vaccine.”
Specifically, the two scientists claim that Merck executives ordered them to use “rigged” methodologies, including taking antibodies from rabbits and adding them to human blood vials, in order to gull regulators into assuming an antibody response robust and durable enough to merit licensing. When those “enhanced” tactics did not achieve Merck’s “fabricated [95%] efficacy rate,” the whistleblowers allege, the company resorted to simply falsifying the test data and engaging in other fraudulent activities.
READ MORE HERE AT CHILD HEALTH SAFETY
Sorry; don't know where I got 5% effectiveness from, it seems like it is quite a bit higher than that at least initially ; still, it does seem likely that a whole lot of people have been unprotected and spreading mumps for many years, given there is no way there has ever been " 95% herd immunity" if the whistleblowers are correct.....
Posted by: Hera | April 06, 2019 at 07:30 PM
Just a different point of view here; a huge amount of adult mumps may not really be something to worry about.Assuming that the MERCK vaccine was indeed only 5% effective, then probably most of the population has continued to have been exposed to the mumps virus at young ages.
Mumps can be very mild; swollen lymph nodes or a swollen jaw that goes away fast, maybe not even worth a doctors visit when young .
From this site
https://www.aboutkidshealth.ca/Article?contentid=753&language=English
"Signs and symptoms of mumps
swelling of one or both of the parotid glands in front of the ear and crossing into the corner of the jaw.
cough or runny nose.
headache and muscle ache.
tiredness.
low-grade fever.
Basically symptoms that could easily be described as a viral infection, and that is in someone who gets the full blown symptoms. What actually surprises me, given how ineffective the vaccine is reputed to be , is that there is anyone much left to catch mumps as an adult.
Also, the CDC says
https://www.cdc.gov/mumps/lab/overview-serology.html
"People with a history of mumps vaccination may not have detectable mumps IgM antibody regardless of timing of specimen collection."
Funny that. Almost as if the vaccine doesn't work on some people at all....
Perhaps this is more just a chance to push to increase sales of MMR vaccines in adults as well. Mandated vaccines for adults next?
Posted by: Hera | April 06, 2019 at 12:02 PM
That is what we need more infertility, on top of what ever the DPT boosters all did. The DPT messed up the hormones big time bad and now let us all have the mumps after puberty. .
Posted by: Benedetta | April 05, 2019 at 12:37 PM
Priceless article from the Sydney based Science writer for the Guardian.
Smell the desperation ? Absolutely no science in sight anywhere - just pure madness !
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/apr/05/why-people-believe-the-earth-is-flat-and-we-should-listen-to-anti-vaxxers
According to Elfy Scoot (the Hoot) , this is why Vaccines are S&E !
To have a hefty chunk of that skeleton dismantled by an eight-minute YouTube video of one guy with a spirit level on an airplane trying to prove the Earth is flat is a disheartening experience (yes, this was a real thing and yes, he is an extremely handsome conspiracy theorist, which makes the whole enterprise frankly even more annoying).
Posted by: Hans Litten | April 05, 2019 at 11:02 AM
CENSORSHIP has become a top priority of the vaccine cartel .. which includes the industry itself, politicians, medical organizations, public health bureaucracies and the media …. because well-informed citizens like RFK .. one among thousands of others similarly informed .. have amassed incontrovertible SCIENTIFIC evidence proving vaccines are NOT as 'safe and effective' as the industry and public health officials insist they are.
Science is on OUR SIDE … which is why it must be kept out of the public square .. no public debate can be held less the vaccine cartel will be EXPOSED for the charlatans they have proven themselves to be.
CENSORHIP AND COERCION .. these are the final breaths of a DYING DYNASTY.
Posted by: Bob Moffit | April 05, 2019 at 07:16 AM