cia, why exactly do you think the numbers are accurate?

How exactly do you propose that the glorious health agencies know exactly how many people at any given time have the so-called measles virus in them?

The reality is that every figure that health authorities claim is an impossible lie because of one word.

"Denominator".

If you don't know the denominator you can't possibly know the ratio.

And the only way to know the denominator for deaths due to measles virus is to know how many people at any one time have the measles virus in their body (we will assume the virus is the actual cause of any injuries whenever its present).

Of course, nobody has ever gone around and tested the general population for measles virus infection. Not since the vaccine. Certainly not before it.

The claimed rates of complications and deaths are completely made up.

I think the relevant wording is - 'Despite more children in the WHO European region being vaccinated against the disease than ever before'. On the WHO website it goes even further - 'The surge in measles cases in 2018 followed a year in which the European Region achieved its highest ever estimated coverage for the second dose of measles vaccination (90% in 2017). More children in the Region received the full two-dose series on time, according to their countries’ immunization schedules, in 2017 than in any year since WHO started collecting data on the second dose in 2000. Coverage with the first dose of the vaccine also increased slightly to 95%, the highest level since 2013.' This is definitely not working according to their vaccinate-the-herd paradigm.

The headline says "Measles cases in Europe tripled from 2017 to 2018". But why don't they talk about Autins cases doubling, tripllng and quadrupling in very country where the vaccines are administered aggressively, zealously and indiscriminately? Measles rarely causes a death, but Autism diagnosis is a life (long) sentence for parents and families. On the top of that, Autism causes deaths in the forms of accidents, family tragedies and drowings. Which is bigger burden on society? People?

@Bayareamom,

That ‘gem’ has been making the rounds among the, ‘pro-forced injections of dangerous products without informed consent or the protection of law’, crowd. In the sense that we have a historical perspective where young men sacrificed themselves to a fascist cause, (NOT as a reflection of any personal attack on this young man) when I first saw that I could not help but think of the Hitler Youth.

An acquaintance had knee replacement surgery. He was in worse pain and had a red swollen knee long after the surgery. After it was determined he was sensitive to the metal in the part that was used, the surgery was re-done using a titanium part instead. When asked why appropriate testing wasn't done in the first place, to rule out the potential metal sensitivity, he was told "because it is so rare." I think this little vignette is emblematic of the autism problem. They know bad reactions happen - it is just that it is more expensive/less profitable to account for those with metal sensitivities. People are left to learn about these issues the hard way. The system is built for profit not health. How many children are exposed to only one vaccine at a time?

Elaine

It a very interesting point - there are many issues here, including whether the bodies are reporting confirmed data (even the position in the U.K. with it gigantic centralised health service is messy), how many unvaccinated cases are infants who didn’t receive anti-bodies from their mother because they had been vaccinated. How many cases were vaccine induced or due to shedding, how many thousands of sub-clinical cases might there be. But the possibility that serious cases we being added to because of recent vaccine history seems quite plausible.