60 Minutes Reports on Detained Children Given Wrong Immunizations
Cheesecake Factory Honors The Spirit of Christmas for Intellectually Disabled Young Adult

The Emperor Has No Clothes

“One would almost think he had nothing on, but that's what makes them so fine.

"Exactly," all the noblemen agreed, though they could see nothing, for there was nothing to see.

The Emperor shivered, for he suspected they were right. But he thought, "This procession has got to go on." So he walked more proudly than ever, as his noblemen held high the train that wasn't there at all.”

Thank you Ted for helping to "connect the dots." The theme of the naked emperor is universal when the people refuse to acknowledge an ugly reality, despite what is in front of their very eyes.

By Ted Kuntz

Vaccination is not:

  • Immunization
  • Safe
  • Effective
  • Evidence-based
  • Patient-centric
  • Prevention
  • Health promoting

Vaccination Policy is:

  • based on faith/blind trust
  • industry dominated
  • anti-science
  • coercive and fear based
  • corrupted by conflicts of interest
  • eroding rights and freedoms


  • negatively impact brain development
  • negatively impact immune development
  • contain neurotoxic ingredients
  • contain aborted human fetal cells
  • contain animal cells and viruses
  • contain chemicals, preservatives and foreign matter
  • are not tested for their ability to cause cancer (carcinogenicity)
  • are not tested for impact on fertility
  • are not tested for their ability to damage an organism (toxicity)
  • are not tested for their ability to damage genetic information within a cell (genotoxicity)
  • are not tested for their ability to change the genetic information within an organism (mutagenicity)
  • are not tested for long term effects
  • erode true herd immunity
  • cause new strains to emerge

Doctors are not:

  • scientists
  • experts in immunology
  • experts in toxicology
  • trained to diagnose vaccine injury
  • trained to treat vaccine injury
  • held accountable if they fail to report vaccine injury
  • educated of the ingredients in vaccines
  • educated on the synergistic effects of vaccine ingredients
  • honoring their Hippocratic oath to ‘First Do No Harm’
  • honoring the precautionary principle
  • providing informed consent
  • experts in research methodology
  • legally accountable for the injuries and deaths they cause when they vaccinate
  • providing patient by patient, disease by disease and vaccine by vaccine risk-benefit consideration

Doctors are:

  • receiving financial benefit when they vaccinate
  • failing to disclose their financial conflict of interest when they recommend vaccination
  • violating their code of ethics when they vaccinate without informed consent
  • violating their code of ethics when they remove non-vaccinating or selectively vaccinating patients from their practice
  • violating their code of ethics when they bully, intimidate or coerce patients to be vaccinated
  • violating the Nuremberg Code
  • violating the Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights
  • ignoring individual patient variables

The CDC is not:

  • independent from industry influence
  • conforming to standard conflicts of interest policies
  • conducting independent safety research
  • responsibly monitoring vaccine injury and death
  • being transparent with vaccine injury and death
  • being honest about the absence of long term safety research
  • promoting health practices that are largely responsible for increased public health (clean water, hygiene, sanitation, nutrition)
  • conducting valid placebo controlled studies
  • conducting long term clinical trials

Health and Human Services is not:

  • monitoring vaccine safety and providing reports to Congress
  • providing easy access to vaccine injury compensation
  • insisting on a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study
  • providing fair compensation to individuals injured or killed by vaccines

The Government is not:

  • demanding independent vaccine safety oversight
  • demanding independent safety studies
  • holding vaccine manufacturers accountable for vaccine injury and death
  • holding the CDC accountable for fraud and misrepresentation of vaccine safety information
  • holding the vaccine industry accountable for fraud and misrepresentation of vaccine safety and effectiveness information

The Media is Not:

  • providing responsible journalism pertaining to vaccine injury
  • allowing public discourse on vaccine safety and effectiveness
  • telling the truth about vaccine safety and effectiveness
  • telling the truth about vaccine exemptions
  • free of financial conflicts of interest
  • independent
  • without bias
  • acting in the best interests of the public
  • supporting informed consent
  • supporting individual rights and freedoms

"But he hasn't got anything on," a little child said.”




Andrea Withrow

I guess I'm anti vaccine then. I learned about vaccines and their dangers from my dog over a decade ago. Every time he went in for his yearly checkup he would get sicker and sicker. It took seven years for me to see the writing on the wall. I then began researching vaccines and dogs. I found a perdue study of vaccinated dogs versus unvaccinated dogs and every dog that had been vaccinated developed antibodies against their own body, but not the unvaccinated dogs.
I then stopped all vaccines for the poor guy, stopped feeding him kibble and got the help of a homeopath. Guess what? His symptoms reversed and within a year he was healthy again. He never got another vaccine and he never had a health crisis after visiting the vet. He also made it to 15 years old. Amazing to see a did thriving at 10 when he was dying at 7.
Then because there wasn't much else to go for dogs, I began studying childhood diseases. I read literature on how to treat those childhood diseases and I realized that most were incredibly benign, especially if treated early.
Knowledge can certainly waylay fear, and vaccines are based in fear mongering. It's almost been 12 years since I began researching and I read about vaccines and the damage they do on an almost daily basis. I also refuse all vaccines for myself and if I had children would do the same for them. I'm just sad my teacher had to suffer for seven years before I knew better.

Susan Welch


Personally, I prefer not to be labelled

cia parker


I suggested that George not take ANYONE'S word for it, but do his own research, looking at the information put forth by both sides. And he's quite right, a list of assertions with no supporting evidence given should not be given credence by anyone. OK, there may be more info on his website, but there's no link given. It looks as though these were points of doctrine which those with similar views just accept as though they were so obvious that no proof is needed. And I said "including mine." I didn't give any links either, but what I said could be googled or the books I mentioned could be read for THEIR scientific studies quoted.

You've seen that a lot of people are completely against all vaccines ever. They could properly be called anti-vaxxers. Everyone in my family has been severely damaged by vaccines, but my parents told me of people they knew who had died of diphtheria and tetanus. They are all true. What have you gained if you get everyone to stop taking any vaccine and then you have thousands die of diphtheria? You've seen that many people have said that no vaccine has ever been proven safe or effective. Nor could any medical product EVER be proven completely safe and effective for everyone. I'm against most vaccines most of the time. I am completely against accepting the recommended vaccination schedule, as I'm well aware, who more so? of the extreme and permanent damage they can cause. But if you consider how few people suffered overt vaccine injury before the vaccine explosion started in 1990, and how what injuries there were were usually caused by the pertussis vaccine, I think it's reasonable to take the DT series, and, under the appropriate circumstances, the polio and Hib vaccines, bearing in mind the risks.

When I say antivaxxers, I'm referring to those who are completely against all vaccines and deny that any of them have ever had the slightest ability to prevent disease in anyone. Or admit that they are usually effective but are so dangerous that they're still against all of them, ever. We don't have enough terms to cover all opinions on the spectrum. How about someone who had been bitten by a dog KNOWN to have rabies? Is there anyone who would still refuse the rabies vaccine under those circumstances? Although if you really believe that no vaccine has ever produced disease immunity in anyone, I guess you would.

What term do you think would be better? Antivaxxers and pro-vaxxers are easy to understand, although most are somewhere in between those extremes. What should I call myself?

Susan Welch

Good heavens, Cia, who are you classing as 'anti-vaxxers'?

The only ones I have come across are families of children who were vaccinated and were injured as a result. Those family members then went on to research and found out just how dangerous vaccines can be. The more appropriate label would be 'ex-vaxxer'. I would have thought you should be aware that the 'anti-vaxxer' label is one that is being used by media, junk scientists and disgruntled health professionals as a term of abuse.

I realise that some of us could now be called that, but your post indicates that we should not be believed if such is our stance.

cia parker

George Gregory,

You're right. There is, however, a lot of evidence supporting many of these claims. I'd recommend you read Dr. Moskowitz 2017 book Vaccines: A Reappraisal, for an excellent overview of many of the problems. Many others as well. If you look up Dr. Moskowitz' book on Amazon, there will be many other books critical of vaccines, most of them with a lot of documented evidence, including many scientific studies.

And you're also right in being hesitant to just take these claims at face value. The fact is that most vaccines are usually effective in preventing the targeted disease for an uncertain length of time. And most people have no obvious reaction to them at any time (reactions which may not be obvious are another story, which Dr. Moskowitz discusses in his book). The flu and pertussis vaccines are unusual in being extremely ineffective in a large percentage of cases. The next question is whether they are always needed. The vaccine establishment goes to great lengths to try to say that all of them are absolutely necessary for everyone, but that is not true. Until the late '80s, only three vaccines were given in the US: DPT, polio, and MMR, and we did just fine, with few deaths from contagious disease. And pertussis and measles had stopped being dangerous long before. By the '60s, before the measles vaccine was introduced, 99% of American kids got measles, because 99% of army recruits showed antibodies in their blood to measles. Three to four million a year got it, including me and everyone I knew, and there was an average of only 450 deaths, most in those already immunocompromised, often from malnutrition in the deep South. And going through natural measles provided much more effective immune function for life, as to some degree all feverish illnesses do, if you don't reduce the fever. MUCH lower cancer rates in those who have had measles in childhood, 20% lower for each febrile disease, up to a probable maximum of 80%. Measles, mumps, chickenpox, and rubella (in everyone but pregnant women in the early months of pregnancy) are relatively mild, very beneficial diseases to go through naturally. Pertussis is only dangerous in infants less than three months old (and the immunocompromised, but vaccines are the major cause of immunocompromise). Both my 8 month old baby, who had gotten three DTaPs, got pertussis and gave it to me. And it was very tough, ten coughs per breath several times a day for over a month in her case, over two months in mine. But it wasn't dangerous, as it usually isn't. When she got the DTaP booster at 18 months old, it erased her only words and she was diagnosed with autism two months later. She had had an encephalitic reaction to the hep-B vaccine, given without permission, at birth, screaming constantly and inconsolably for four days and nights. That's another vaccine it's criminal to give unless the mother is positive for hep-B surface antigen. The most dangerous vaccines are the hep-B, MMR, flu, and DTaP, although all of them have caused disability and death in at least a small percentage of those who get them.

Over half of American children now suffer from overt vaccine damage, usually neurological damage like autism or seizure disorder, or allergic or autoimmune disease (asthma, all allergies, especially peanut allergy (Hib vaccine), diabetes, bowel disease, and/or hundreds of others. Read Heather Fraser's The Peanut Allergy Epidemic. Read Randall Neustaedter's The Vaccine Guide. Look up Barbara Loe Fischer's "In the Wake of Vaccines," for CDC statistics showing the explosion of cases of several diseases before and after vaccines. Read Vaccine Epidemic and The Age of Autism (book). Denial, also by Dan Olmsted and Mark Blaxill. Read DPT: A Shot in the Dark. Any book by Neil Z. Miller.

Autism rates started exploding in 1990 because the Hib series and the hep-B series were put on the recommended schedule at that time. Going from three in 10,000 in 1987 (North Dakota study) to one in 36 now. Read Handley's How to End the Autism Epidemic for proof of autism figures.

However, the other side is that you also have to consider the danger from the vaccine-preventable diseases. Hib rates increased exponentially in the years before the vaccine was introduced in the '80s, because all vaccines depress immune function for a time after getting them (another reason to minimize them), and because antibiotics had become much less effective in treating bacterial diseases like Hib. One in two hundred babies in the US was getting a clinical case, always very serious (there were many more mild or subclinical cases), one in a thousand was dying of it even with hospital care, and a large percentage of the survivors were left deaf or mentally retarded. The vaccine almost completely wiped out Hib disease wherever it was used. On the other hand, the Hib vaccine can cause diabetes, autism, other conditions (see package insert online), and peanut allergy. After reading Fraser's book I was appalled and totally against the Hib vaccine, but then when I read more about HIb disease and how many had died or been disabled by it, I took a more nuanced stance. I think babies should be taken care of at home, not be in daycare for the first two years, and be breastfed for at least two years, and that would prevent most cases of Hib disease. But parents of babies who HAVE to be in daycare should consider getting them the Hib series starting at four months, not two (the baby has antibodies from his mother for the first six months). It's not necessary after the first twelve or maybe eighteen months. But the parents MUST be aware that their baby is at greatly increased risk of many diseases in daycare and that peanut allergy rates are one in fifty children who got the Hib vaccine.

I think it's a good idea to get the DT series (no pertussis ever, for anyone), after the age of two or three years old, not before (unless, God forbid, diphtheria comes back). They are very serious diseases, often fatal even with advanced hospital care. Tetanus spores are everywhere, and half of all tetanus cases are from a splinter or similar that were so minor or even unnoticed that the person was unaware that he had been infected. Very few get it now BECAUSE almost everyone has gotten many tetanus shots, which seem to protect for at least forty years, not ten. Diphtheria is also a very terrible disease. Diphtheria germs continue to be everywhere. It requires an additional pathogen within the diphtheria germ to cause the clinical disease, which is, fortunately, not always present. Combining the vaccines in the DT results in a less reactive vaccine, and I just think it's a good idea, though I would never mandate any vaccine for anyone. Both vaccines are usually very effective, although no vaccine is 100% effective in everyone. If polio came back, I'd recommend that parents give it careful consideration, for obvious reasons. We don't have DDT anymore, but we have other chemicals in the environment which can also potentise the virus to become very dangerous, crippling or even killing a small percentage of the total number who contracts the disease. But I had a college roommate crippled by polio: she's still crippled, decades later.

I agree with you that it's very important to require evidence and proof. Look at Neil Miller's recent book discussing several hundred scientific studies showing many kinds of vaccine damage. The proof is there. Vaccines ARE very dangerous, both because of ingredients like mercury, aluminum, foreign proteins, etc., and because of the inherent vaccination process, which always causes excessive inflammation to make the immune system react and produce antibodies, which can cause encephalitis and stroke-like damage (because they are mini-strokes), and the chronic inflammation of all autoimmune diseases. Look at Handley's book for a discussion of about ten studies over many years on damage caused by aluminum, specifically aluminum in vaccines. The most recent ones are from 2018. It specifically explains how aluminum in vaccines can cause autism (but, again, mercury, possibly other ingredients, and just plain vaccine encephalitis, which can be caused by any vaccine, can also do it).

I don't like lists like this because they leave out any consideration of the diseases. It is NOT the case that if everyone were well-nourished with a healthy lifestyle, then everyone could just get any of the VPDs with impunity. No. Many would always be disabled or killed by them. We shouldn't forget them. Homeopathy offers many answers. Taking homeopathic nosodes the long, drawn-out way (four potencies taken in an ascending way over a few months) produces antibodies and very good protection (never 100% for anything). But even one pellet of any potency taken once gives short-term protection, as shown in studies carried out in South America, where the governments of many countries have subsidized homeopathic programs to prevent and treat epidemic diseases. The same nosodes can also be used for very effective treatment of the diseases, or remedies which fit the symptom picture can be used, which are also very effective. And safe. My daughter and I are taking the nosodes for protection from meningococcal disease now. Read The Solution and any of Dr. Isaac Golden's books on this.

This is a very interesting subject, very important for everyone in the world. You absolutely SHOULDN'T take the word of your doctor, the CDC, Merck ads, anything written in a newspaper, magazine, or announced on a news broadcast. Some is true, but some is propaganda designed to sell vaccines produced by the medical-industrial complex. On the other hand, don't believe everything you read by anti-vaxxers either, which you have already shown that you do not do. Absolutely look for additional information regarding everything anyone says. Including me

Laura Hayes

George Gregory,

I invite you to watch 2 comprehensive, vaccine-related presentations I have given, both housed here on AoA, both with transcripts included, one with hyperlinks, and one with resources listed at the end.

"Why Is This Legal?" by Laura Hayes


"Vaccines: What Is There to Be 'Pro' About?" by Laura Hayes


I encourage you to watch both, in hopes you will learn to protect yourself and any future children from vaccine-induced harm and vaccine-induced premature death.

You will also learn that our government refuses to commission or require proper or needed studies on vaccines.

John Stone

Hi George

You are actually quite right - it’s just a list of the overwhelming frustrations that confront so many who have researched this subject. You may notice the author has just invited everyone to visit his website and download his free book.


George Gregory

I am a fifteen year old sophomore in high school and this isn't and article. It is a list of claims that could be false or true. No one would know. The only reason I'm here is because I'm doing a speech on controversial subjects. Sir, I would like to see your sources and your evidence. Currently all that is here is a list. If I were to turn this in at my school I'm 100% certain that I would receive an F. And not because of the subject. Because of the fact that there are no sources, no evidence backing up your claims, and no real format to your "article" at all.

Ted Kuntz

Thank you all for your comments and support. In response to Donna L's comment of how each of these statements could be an entire chapter in a book, I have already written this book. It is entitled: Dare to Question - One Parent to Another. It can be downloaded for free from http://www.daretoquestionvaccination.com

Hans Litten

Glyphosate Contamination in childhood vaccines (Samsel-Seneff)


Note to Reader: Corporate Media Has Avoided Reporting the Truth on This Topic Because the Biotech Industry Pays them BILLIONS for Ads Annually. So Please Share This Good News So Humanity Can Celebrate!

Biotech giants Monsanto and Bayer are infamous for their destructive practices. So it’s probably shocking to hear their recent 62.5 billion dollar merger is turning out to be some of the best news of the year for those of us who care about human health and that of the environment.

Ahead of the merger, and even now, most wholistic health advocates and supporters of the Millions Against Monsanto movement wrongly assume this news is disaster. How could the merging of two of the industries “big 6” lead to anything less than a more resilient opponent in the long term? And how could any sane or non-corrupt DOJ official approve this kind of merger in the first place? Just think about it for a moment:

Pesticides + GMOs + Medicines = No Bueno, Right?

Surprisingly there’s a huge light at the end of the tunnel here.

Hans Litten


We have them ! We have them ! We have them !

Leaked emails from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency confirms that Formaldehyde, a key ingredient in vaccines, is the number one cause of Leukaemia

The EPA, under pressure from the chemical industry, was forced to delay the release of a groundbreaking study confirming the cancer risks from formaldehyde, according to confidential emails seen by Reuters.

Reuters.com reports: Top EPA officials have declined to review the study or be briefed by its experts on the findings, the internal communications showed.

The EPA already lists formaldehyde, used in building materials like plywood and foam insulation, as a probable carcinogen. The new report is expected for the first time to detail its links to leukaemia.

The report, an update of the EPA’s existing human health assessment of the widely used chemical, was completed by scientists from the agency’s Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) late last year and must go through a months-long internal review process before it can be issued to the public for comment.

Angus Files

Here here!!

Pharma For Prison




This is brilliant! Thank you Mr Kuntz and AoA!


I realise that John, but I have a pretty good track record of persuading people of this eventually.

John Stone


Very much your own belief - also very much outside the scope of Ted Kuntz’s commentary.

Donna L.

What Brian Nomi said. Each point listed here could be an entire chapter in a book.
There's your next project, Ted!



I know it's harsh, but why weren't we doing this 30 years ago instead of saying "but but but, vaccines are really good we just need to make them safer"? Greg Beattie had already demolished the supposed evidence for vaccines by then.

And can I add one?

Viruses and bacteria are:

Completely ubiquitous - even the ones that we are told to fear - and therefore are not dangerous, let alone contagious.

Brian Nomi

Wow, so much info in a short 1-page article. Each point could be the subject of a few thousand words with detailed citations, etc. All very true. A nice summary of where we are today.


Really good article, in plain English format, which does not miss the point, and hit the wall behind it!

World Health Organisation. WHO. States, "Tuberculosis kills five thousand people every day. The social and economic impacts are devestating including poverty ,stigma,disrimination "
Dr Tedros Adanom Ghebreyesus WHO Director -General

The Chief medical officer for Scotland stated in 1947 With X-ray Machines in George Square accompanied by The Highland Light Infintary Pipe Band "That the end of Tuberculosis was in sight "

Evidence based medicine is worth more than selling itself to the the Magic 8 ball sector surely ?

Uncovering the mystery of the magic 8 Ball youtube

R Prasad

Brilliant summary of Vaccines, Vaccine "Science", Govt apathy, Agencies collusion with very entities they are supposed to regulate, Boughtable media, Monopolistic and hegemonistic medical industry that sets the rules, and the doctors who obey the big pharma for big money. Kudos to Ted Kuntz.

Even some of the mainstream experts are weighing in on Autism being an environmental and autoimmune condition than "Autism always existed, we are just noticing it now" or "Everybody has Autism with varying degrees" kind of outrageous comments.


Jeannette Bishop

Thank you, Ted Kuntz! This well canvasses the failings of the U.S. program.

No clothes and no antigens? (posted a few times already, but IMO important to get at least a minute's look at in case anyone hasn't had time for the report linked in the article below)

For anyone who gets a lot of their vax info from audio (maybe like me while trying to do the dishes): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HIlbbE_H5Y

"The first vaccine they thoroughly tested was Infanrix Hexa – a six-in-one vaccine manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) that is *supposed* to contain the following antigens: tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis toxoids; inactivated poliomyelitis viral strains 1-2-3; and hepatitis B surface antigen. Shockingly, Corvelva found NONE of these antigens in the vaccine, meaning, that NO antibodies to the intended antigens will be created.

"And it gets worse. In addition to no vaccine antigens, they found the following:

- traces of 65 chemical cross-contaminants from other manufacturing lines;
chemical toxins;
- unrecognizable macromolecules;
- various free bacterial peptides that are potential allergens and are capable of inducing autoimmune reactions."

Hans Litten

Africa seems more used to what is happening than we are maybe. Perhaps




Truthful, concise, easy to comprehend.
And rhetorically devastating in part or in whole.

A great list to hand out to state and federal legislators.

Hans Litten

Posted by: John Stone | December 18, 2018 at 08:27 AM

IT is my belief they soon will be held accountable soon JDS.
I hope and pray this biological warfare program can be brought to a halt by our stand.
Science has passed their lies by (Corvela-Gatti sp.)
To continue they will have to start rounding up the vaccine resistance.
Or tying up the loose ends (Bradstreet) - I suspect they prefer this route.


The CDC has lied about vaccines and autism for 14 years. Let’s put a stop to it!
December 17, 2018 By The Weston A Price Foundation Leave a Comment
Mark Green, currently a senator in Tennessee and a newly elected member of the U.S. House of Representatives, publically stated in a town hall meeting that he intends to hold the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) accountable regarding their own “fraudulently managed” data on autism and vaccines.

View Green’s town hall speech here: https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/politics/2018/12/12/tennessee-mark-green-vaccine-autism-cdc-congressman-anti-vax/2288164002/

So so pleased about the Zostavax legal action for blindness. Another nail in their coffin.

Laura Hayes


Nicely broken down list, making it an excellent summary of the issues.

Goes hand in glove with my recent presentation:

“Why Is This Legal?” by Laura Hayes


Thank you for not whitewashing or watering down the truth, Ted!

John Stone


But you are missing the point - they are not liable, and if they were they wouldn't do it.

Mark Wax

May I add just one to Ted's truths:
The Government is NOT providing for due process under the Constitution in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.

Hans Litten

Good article Ted but I don't want their compensation. Too late for any of that.

•providing easy access to vaccine injury compensation

I just want them all held personally to account (in whatever form the public chooses).
May God have mercy on their souls.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)