So far, gsk is still growing and this fact has never been mentioned in the press, even though my company still imports some gsk medicines, which is bad but I have no other way because demand for medication is still too great. eg zinnat 500mg
https://muabanthuoctay.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=151&search=zin&category_id=0

I think Corvelva's analysis of the MMRV is more proof of the mystical magicalness of aluminium.

According to Eindecker, Al makes everything it touches invisible but the MMRV doesn't have Al so you would think that disproves his claim.

But I don't believe it does.

I think that Al is so mystical and magical it even makes vaccine ingredients invisible in vaccines that don't conatain aluminium.

One must always think like Eindecker. And Eindecker knows that no matter what we must always conclude vaccines are safe and effective

https://www.corvelva.it/speciali-corvelva/analisi/vaccinegate-priorix-tetra-analysis-2nd-step-update.html

"It has been confirmed (as emerged in the previous phase) the presence of fetal DNA in large quantities, 1.7 μg in the first batch and 3.7 μg in the second batch, about 325 times higher than the maximum limit of 10 nanograms and 325,000 times higher than the minimum limit of 10 picograms...

"...there are no fragments of DNA inside this drug, but whole strands, with the presence of an entire genome.

"We have also confirmed that there is no presence of the rubella virus genome in the first batch and in the second batch; using a much more sensitive detection, we have found it in 3 reads, equal to 0.00008% of the total RNA viruses...

"...Can 3 reads, equal to 0.00008% of the total RNA viruses, create immunization? If so, then a very serious problem opens up on what you read below....

"Within the GlaxoSmithKline Priorix Tetra vaccine, Proteobacteria, Platyhelminthes worms and Nematoda, 10 more ssRNA viruses, Microviridae (bacterial viruses or phage) and numerous retroviruses including endogenous human and avian retroviruses, avian viruses, human immunodeficiency virus and immunodeficiency virus of monkeys (fragments that if inserted into the database turn out to be fragments of HIV and SIV), murine virus, horse infectious anemia virus, lymphoproliferative disease virus, Rous sarcoma virus. Other viruses like alphaendornavirus and hepatitis b virus, yeast virus.

"Within the GlaxoSmithKline Priorix Tetra vaccine, Proteobacteria, Platyhelminthes worms and Nematoda, 10 more ssRNA viruses, Microviridae (bacterial viruses or phage) and numerous retroviruses including endogenous human and avian retroviruses, avian viruses, human immunodeficiency virus and immunodeficiency virus of monkeys (fragments that if inserted into the database turn out to be fragments of HIV and SIV), murine virus, horse infectious anemia virus, lymphoproliferative disease virus, Rous sarcoma virus. Other viruses like alphaendornavirus and hepatitis b virus, yeast virus."

Just forget the scientific facts that 15 year olds brains who lived and died autism, have more aluminium in their brains than 80 plus year old severe chronic Alzheimer's brains.
According to the pharma double speak Orwellian book of Eindecker Autism,Aluminium antigens in brains,are not to be found because aluminium vanishes its a vanisher. and if found it never ever ,100% certainly never came from vaccines, that`s for sure...Bah Humbug!!

Aluminium et Autisme : la découverte du Pr Christopher Exley

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0TahxmLBnw

Pharma For Prison

MMR RIP

Hera here's an excellent review on adjuvants https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3967670/ the title says it all "Working together: interactions between vaccine antigens and adjuvants" There are several types of adjuvant, the essential feature of all these adjuvants is that they enable the antigens to undergo a slow release, so that the antogens are not rapidly eliminated from the body. In the case of aluminium salt adjuvants the antigens are embedded in a honeycomb type matrix of the insoluble aluminium adjuvant aggregate. So it's hardly surprising that the Corvelva test failed to find anything, the trypsin enzyme just didn't have access to the antigens, the method may work on antigens in free solution but it's almost certainly (OOPS sorry Barry) not been validated for this application with antigens complexed with an adjuvant.

Jenny there appears to be a shortage of the >65 flu vaccine version in the UK, so can’t be that many people refusing it http://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/clinical/immunisation/70-of-gps-unable-to-secure-enough-flu-vaccine-for-over-65s/20037786.article “70% of GPs unable to secure enough flu vaccine for over-65s” I wouldn’t worry about squalene, here’s a meta analysis conducted on flu vaccines using squalene and non-squalene adjuvants https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X09013103?via%3Dihub and no squalene was not in vaccines given to participants in the Gulf war, minute amounts detected in studies were shown to come from contaminated laboratory glassware file:///C:/Users/Family/Downloads/Anthrax%20and%20Squalene%20QA.pdf Also see https://cvi.asm.org/content/13/9/1010 “we demonstrated that antisqualene antibodies are frequently detectable at very low titers in the sera of subjects who were never immunized with vaccines containing squalene. More importantly, vaccination with a subunit influenza vaccine with the MF59 adjuvant neither induced antisqualene antibodies nor enhanced preexisting antisqualene antibody titers.

Angus: Thanks for the lovely music. Best solstice ever!

Page 206 Forrest Maready Crooked: Man-made disease explained

As it so happens, vaccines are administered in such a way they cause both triggers for immune activation in the dorsal vagal complex - and many of them simultaneously introduce the very ingredient you wouldn't ever want to get transported into that area. It seemed like the perfect crime -
as if someone had purposefully designed this event to cause neurological damage.

Nothing to crow or be pro about what says you Eindecker and Chop.

Aluminum in Vaccines: What Everyone Needs to Know

https://www.westonaprice.org/health-topics/vaccinations/aluminum-in-vaccines-what-everyone-needs-to-know/

“Vaccines: What Is There to Be ‘Pro’ About?”

SAFETY STUDIES
If you were to ask the FDA or the CDC which studies they use to determine the safety and recommendation of injectable aluminum, they would refer you to the only study done by an FDA scientist. “Updated Aluminum Pharmacokinetics Following Infant Exposures Through Diet and Vaccination,” by Dr. Robert J. Mitkus was published October 2011 in the journal Vaccine. While the title may sound impressive, this study was heavily flawed. Mitkus tested infused intravenously (rather than injected) aluminum citrate (rather than aluminum hydroxide) into adults (rather than infants). As J.B. Handley, co-founder of Generation Rescue, wrote, “Dr. Mitkus’ study is somewhere between a professional disgrace and a fraudulent disaster. In no other drug on the planet (except for vaccines) would safety standards ever be determined without using the actual product (aluminum hydroxide) administered the proper way (intramuscular injection) into the proper patient population (infants).”

Pharma For Prison

MMR RIP

John/Hera Do you really want to understand what almost certainly is the explanation to the Corvelva results?

*********
Definition of almost : very near but not quite
Definition of certainly: Undoubtedly; definitely

What does 'almost certainly' even mean? Is that the current 'scientific' position on vaccines .... that you know, they're 'almost certainly' safe and effective? Nudge nudge, wink wink.

I don't know how you expect to be taken seriously as a scientist, if you're going to introduce your expertise with wishy-washy language like that.

I can't speak for anyone else , but I can definitely tell you that when I saw you lead with language that... I didn't read another word that you had to say

Nothing to crow about or be pro about ..the pharma crows are not crowing.

Enjoy!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WzCdQbxgkAQ

Pharma For Prison

MMR RIP

If GSK were to sue CORVELVA, presumably for this...

"Proteins solubility and their digestion (i.e. the capacity to divide them into small peptide fragments) are two typical proteins characteristics that not only makes it possible to study them through some specific analysis methods but are also fundamental for the interaction with the immune system to create protective antibodies, because if the protein structure is heavily altered from the original one, the new antibodies result completely different from those that are able to attack the original antibodies causing illnesses.


"Since this polymer we have encountered, derived from the antigenic mix, is not only different for its spatial conformation but it’s chemically different, so we can state that we are not facing antigens similar to the original ones but in the form of a compound with an unknown and unpredictable toxicity and efficacy."

...and not for finding all the contaminants they found (which would probably seem absurd and dubious to all), then would discovery allow the public to see exactly what documents are in the vaults of GSK that establish Infanrix Hexa's safety and efficacy?

John/Hera Do you really want to understand what almost certainly is the explanation to the Corvelva results?

The technique they used for the detecting the protein components (Toxoids, & other protein antigens) was to digest them with trypsin, a proteolytic enzyme, and then look for characteristic patterns amongst the digested proteins that would indicate the presence of a given toxoid, don't take my word for it it's here from Corvelva " to separate the antigens from each other and to be digestible by the enzyme specific for proteins (trypsin). We have found instead a real polymer, insoluble and indigestible, that we supposed to be the set of antigens chemically bound together (has to be defined if this is present as an aggregate of the individual antigens or a single macromolecule), on which we can find in literature partial information regarding the single antigens"

Please note "WE FOUND A REAL POLYMER INSOLUBLE & INDIGESTIBLE" Now look at the eMC for Infanrix hexa https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/2586/smpc and you will see that the various antigens are complexed with 2 forms of aluminium adjuvant, which, by the way, are insoluble polymers

So John & Hera Corvelva were using a technique that may work on pure toxoids, (I don't know), but it is certainly highly unlikely to work on toxoids complexed as insoluble complexes to aluminium adjuvants.

So Fred's point is well made, how credible is the "secret" analytical lab, their findings and methods have not been peer reviewed & instead they go public with this highly dubious result. I do hope GSK sue them!!!

Hi Frederic,
If a product is being falsely described, and is being given to millions of people, I expect the whole issue to make the mainstream news. I expect independent consumer safety groups all over the place to get samples and test them. I expect the company to release lots of data showing all its quality control testing.
Brush it under the rug and ignore the allegations? Imo, very suspicious.

So if y'all don't care who (and by that I mean the researchers' names) wrote this report, what lab(s) they used, or whether their work has been peer-reviewed, what standards DO you require?

It's the same old story of rubbish analytical methods that gave rise to the fairy stories about glyphosphate in vaccines & most ridiculously of all the covert sterilization in Kenya

*********
The most ridiculous fairy tale ever to emerge from rubbish analytical methods, is the well funded conclusion that any vaccine has ever prevented a disease of any kind

Fairy tale indeed..

Fred

Just found your comment in the spam - it happens, including to mine. CORVELVA have published the report and presumably take responsibility for it. And who, by the way, are you?

Come on John, stop censoring the internet. Who wrote this analysis? Do you think if you don't post my comment no one will ask?

Hans/Angus The analytical method was not approved by an external referee and as a scientist the title of the method seems utter gobbley de gook, oh and it's an "undisclosed" analytical lab that's doing the analysis with this unapproved method, lord a mercy but some people are just plain gullible.
It's the same old story of rubbish analytical methods that gave rise to the fairy stories about glyphosphate in vaccines & most ridiculously of all the covert sterilization in Kenya

Not crowing today Chop and Eindecker are we now hahaha!

Pharma For Prison

MMR RIP

Fred - what is your French like because I cant make any sense of this one ?

https://www.ladepeche.fr/article/2018/12/18/2927134-papillomavirus-professeurs-toulousains-contestent-propos-dangers-vaccination.html

Suite aux annonces faites par l’ancien député Gérard Bapt sur les dangers qu’occasionnerait la vaccination contre le papillomavirus, le docteur Jacques Rimailho, chirurgien en gynécologie oncologie au CHU de Toulouse, et le professeur Christophe Pasquier, virologiste au CHU de Toulouse, ont souhaité apporter un éclairage différent.

Dans un courrier adressé à la rédaction, ils se sont dits « choqués » par les arguments avancés par l’ancien maire de Saint-Jean et en profitent pour étayer leurs propos. Ils rappellent ainsi que « le cancer du col utérin est rare, voire exceptionnel, avant 25 ans. Son développement après contamination par un papillomavirus (HPV) est un processus long durant de 15 à 20 ans ».

Les deux médecins soulignent également que « la vaccination HPV n’a débuté qu’en 2007 ». Pour eux, « affirmer que l’augmentation des cancers du col est liée à cette vaccination est tout simplement faux car impossible, les modes de vie (consommation de tabac par exemple) et de contamination (sexualité), très probablement responsables, ayant évolué sur la même période ».

At this time the peer review scientific committees in the field of immunological research related to vaccines are out of the game. They have deliberately blocked the research sector in this field, supported by bigpharma .. No guarantee of safety, vaccines lacking effectiveness and efficiency, very high risks to human health, autoimmune diseases and childhood cancer growing exponentially. We will not stop. Friends of the free world let us join in this long war. You can make a difference.

Coincidentally I've started reading Dangerous Doses by Katherine Eban. It's about counterfeit drugs and drugs that have been tampered with (but in the United States, and I don't see that she mentions vaccines anywhere):

"The counterfeits were not a one-time fluke but rather a consequence of America's distribution system. Our medicine moves through a gray market of middlemen who trade the drugs as they would any other commodity, seeking profits from ever-fluctuating prices. These sales can obscure the medicine's origin and make its purity impossible to guarantee. They also open the door to counterfeits.

Investigators realized by 2002 that felons including narcotics traffickers and those with ties to organized crime had infiltrated America's drug supply. After becoming licensed wholesalers, they poured compromised medicine into our distribution system. Their profits rivaled those in the narcotics trade...."

Dear Frederic or Frederica Chopin .I thought you would have realised by now, that your perception of an "F" sharp ain't ever going to hit the right note, or ever going to be "F" n well competent and capable of doing so, now ,or in the future, ma dear wee chum !

Truly shocking! In which peer-reviewed journal is this published?