New Study Links Lowered Probability of Pregnancy in Females 25 - 29 to HPV Vaccination
Here is an addendum to this post from the study author, Gayle Delong, PhD:
In connection with my paper, the question has been raised: Given that married women who had the HPV shot were less likely to conceive than those who did not receive the shot, were the former more likely to use birth control than the latter? My result that married women who received the shot were less likely to conceive could be explained if those women were more actively trying to prevent pregnancy than married women who did not receive the shot.
The three questions on NHANES that provide insights into contraception are 1) SXQ251: In the past 12 months, how often had you had sex without a condom? 2) RHD442: Are you taking birth control pills now? 3) RHQ520: Are you now using Depo-Provera or injectables to prevent pregnancy?
I seek to determine whether married women who received the HPV shot are more actively seeking to prevent pregnancy than married women who did not receive the shot. I define “actively seeking to prevent pregnancy” as women who at the time of the interview were using condoms at least half the time or taking the birth control pill or receiving an injectable. I find 51.5% of married women who did not receive the shot and 36.6% of married women who received the shot were actively seeking to prevent pregnancy. The 14.9% difference is statistically significant at the 1% level.
This finding suggests that a greater percentage of married women who received the shot should be conceiving compared with married women who did not receive the shot. However, my original study finds that married women who received the shot are less likely to conceive than married women who did not receive the shot. The finding of my original study is not the result of married women who received the HPV vaccine actively avoiding pregnancy more than women who did not receive the HPV shot. I’m happy to discuss details of my results with researchers who are interested.
A lowered probability of pregnancy in females in the USA aged 25–29 who received a human papilloma vaccine injection
Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, DOI: 10.1080/15287394.2018.1477640
ABSTRACT Birth rates in the United States have recently fallen. Birth rates per 1000 females aged 25–29 fell from 118 in 2007 to 105 in 2015. One factor may involve the vaccination against the human papillomavirus (HPV). Shortly after the vaccine was licensed, several reports of recipients experiencing primary ovarian failure emerged. This study analyzed information gathered in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which represented 8 million 25-to-29-year-old women residing in the United States between 2007 and 2014. Approximately 60% of women who did not receive the HPV vaccine had been pregnant at least once, whereas only 35% of women who were exposed to the vaccine had conceived. For married women, 75% who did not receive the shot were found to conceive, while only 50% who received the vaccine had ever been pregnant. Using logistic regression to analyze the data, the probability of having been pregnant was estimated for females who received an HPV vaccine compared with females who did not receive the shot. Results suggest that females who received the HPV shot were less likely to have ever been pregnant than women in the same age group who did not receive the shot. If 100% of females in this study had received the HPV vaccine, data suggest the number of women having ever conceived would have fallen by 2 million. Further study into the influence of HPV vaccine on fertility is thus warranted.
Gayle DeLong, PhD, is an Associate Professor of Economics and Finance in the Bert W. Wasserman Department of Economics and Finance at Baruch’s Zicklin School of Business. Dr. DeLong has published in leading journals, including Journal of Finance, Journal of Financial Economics, Journal of International Money and Finance, Financial Management, and Journal of Financial Research. Research interests include bank acquisitions, regulatory capture, and conflicts of interest. DeLong, the 2013 recipient of the Abraham J. Briloff Prize in Ethics as well as the 2010 recipient of the Zicklin School of Business Teaching Excellence Award, holds a PhD in finance and international business from New York University.
Citation: Gayle DeLong (2018): A lowered probability of pregnancy in females in the USA aged 25–29 who received a human papillomavirus vaccine injection, Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, DOI: 10.1080/15287394.2018.1477640
Del Bigtree on the Highwire
Gayle DeLong talking on 18 minutes with the most seismic revelations since the Thompson revelations.
Posted by: Hans Litten | June 19, 2018 at 07:41 AM
Sorry John,its the refusal to look at the undeniable evidence supplied which makes it a criminal matter being covered up from the very top.I watched a very depressing video the other day on how child grooming is being covered up in the UK.The same model is being used in vaccines world wide.I remember going to the Police with the MMR case the serious fraud dept etc''silence!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAMcVquIe2o&t=2s
Pharma For Prison
MMR RIP
Posted by: Angus Files | June 14, 2018 at 03:29 AM
@ Hans Litten, Please pardon my not knowing the country you are talking about as to being ignored by seniors when you do try. Please tell me (and us, again).
Thanks for such, and your contributions.
Pertinently, I am working on a Paper citing the exact time-line of the emergence of Alzhemer's with perfect correlation/cause of the Alzheimer's emergence and iits accelerated rise, in direct cause/effect with the mercury-loaded annual flu vaccine. In your country - if not the U.S. - could you send me info on Alzheimer's incidence/prevalence?
My email is [email protected] ps: Please keep sending to Age of Autism - much appreciated.
Posted by: david m burd | June 13, 2018 at 08:28 PM
Hans: Horrifying. That clown Rudin was financed by both the Rockefellers and the Nazis.
Posted by: Gary Ogden | June 13, 2018 at 04:40 PM
Angus
We have enough evidence, and we will inevitably have even more - the problem is the ever greater absence of integrity from politicians and governments. However, I do believe in this instance there will be a breaking point.
Posted by: John Stone | June 13, 2018 at 12:57 PM
Thanks Hans so from a point of realising the costs Soros et-al are using the costs to take down countries ..
"He additionally repeatedly drew attention to the financial burden of the sick and disabled.[8]"
HPV is in a league offits own even with the video evidence young girls excelling at school and life up to the HPV vaccine -BUT we still dont have enough evidence to get the ears of politicians governments and the rest of the drunk on money Pharma despots.
Offit never liked it when his space was interrupted unexpected by the VAXXED team ..more of the same needed I think..no doubt Frazer and his conscience sunning themselves on a beach somewhere..whilst the population dies slow kill.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRAJdyPNWnA
Pharma For Prison
MMR RIP
Posted by: Angus Files | June 13, 2018 at 12:34 PM
Posted by: David m burd | June 13, 2018 at 07:08 AM
Every time I think I know it all about these vaccines (complete over confidence I know), I learn of some new and quite frankly shocking to the core vaccine atrocity perpetrated.
A series of old articles from 2009 onwards by quite clearly a genius predicted they had to go after the boys to hide the damage being heaped down on the girls (when the statistics are put side by side along gender lines , Gardasil damage stands out like the Empire State.)
This person was able to see how it was the damage is achieved via histamine
http://www.renewamerica.com:80/columns/janak/080830
"How long is it going to take the FDA and the CDC and all the other organizations around the world to see what is happening here? We already have 9,749 reported adverse events and 21 reported deaths in the United States alone. Do we need to make that number go into the 100,000's? What do they need?
I am begging the FDA, CDC and Merck to please please look at my findings. I am not a research scientist but I was the one to have to put the pieces of this epidemic together for you. Check out the dates of the studies that I have referenced. This information was available pre-licensure of Gardasil. Find out who was asleep at the switch to let all these findings be ignored.
Why did I have to be the one? Why were not these chemicals studied in a setting to see what they would do in a vaccine environment? WHY, WHY, WHY!!!!!!!!! We have girls dying and disabled and you are saying that there is no causative factor with Gardasil. Here it is! All the causation you need. Look into this immediately.
Oh, my dear God. I am sorry but I have to end this article here because I am next to tears and cannot go any further.
Please do your own research into this vaccine and decide if it is the right thing for you.
NOTE: If I have made any mistakes because I am not a research scientist with what I have posted here today please feel free to let me know and I will check out your findings and post a retraction."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And now Suzanne Humphries (another genius) has outlined a nasty male side effect of e_dyfunction in recipients of this abomination_vaccination. Again depopulation aligned.
The crimes with vaccines just go on and on, and we are the only ones who appear to know.
And the worst of it is, try as hard as I can to warn, the herd often laughs at me, and will not listen.
I am literally seeing the demise of the seniors in front of my eyes (I am begging them to listen about the flu vaccine but they believe the lying doctors - & the doctors do know btw).
Very sad. Heart breaking. Endless
Posted by: Hans Litten | June 13, 2018 at 11:20 AM
Posted by: Angus Files | June 13, 2018 at 07:19 AM
Angus you might be interested & pleased to hear this :
"Everything that can go wrong has gone wrong."
Soros on the EU
https://everipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_R%25C3%25BCdin/
The beginning of our current problem started here !
Posted by: Hans Litten | June 13, 2018 at 11:03 AM
Hans I was going to comment then scored it out and then wrote again and scored it out-I thought I am just repeating myself.The only twit bit Is Ian Frazer when you look up Soros/Wiki and you see his Soros achievement accolades.He has obvious skill put to bad use.Where as if the system had been different goodness knows what good he could have done.He has taken the silver and he will pay the price on judgement day a traitor to Scotland and mankind.
Pharma For Prison
MMR RIP
Posted by: Angus Files | June 13, 2018 at 07:19 AM
Hans,
A review of U.S. mainstream media shows a continuing massive number of articles promoting the HPV vaccine while virtually ignoring its terrible (and permanent) effects, including sterility.
The public absorbs this relentless propaganda, while mainstream "journalists" keep repeating it, and mainstream doctors (unforgivably) continue to follow CDC's orders. Incidentally, the originators of this vaccine are on public record that ii was only for females as the only risk of males passing on HPV was between those men having sex with other men, but now even ALL boys are conned into getting the shot(s). Of course, there are eminent scientists on record the HPV viruses do NOT cause cervical cancer, but completely ignored by Pharma-bought off doctors and the bought off media.
Posted by: David m burd | June 13, 2018 at 07:08 AM
Hans
Perhaps it is because there really isn’t all that much to add. There ought, of course, to be a million messages.
I was permitted to post a link to the study in BMJ Rapid Responses, commenting that just possibly it was a matter of public concern!
Posted by: John Stone | June 13, 2018 at 06:22 AM
Only 8 comments on an article as explosive and meaningful as this.
Finally science has put a figure on what is occurring here.
There should be 800 comments on this article.
Does mass sterilisation not concern anyone ?
Posted by: Hans Litten | June 13, 2018 at 04:22 AM
The American College of Pediatricians warned, in 2016, that the HPV vaccine can cause Premature ovarian failure.
https://www.acpeds.org/the-college-speaks/position-statements/health-issues/new-concerns-about-the-human-papillomavirus-vaccine
Posted by: Susan | June 13, 2018 at 02:07 AM
Once upon a time after vaccinating my daughter with a DPT -- as she entered kindergarten; I had a vivid dream that I had gone to the doctors and had her sterilized. I wept, cried about it, and when I awoke I was still disturbed and prayed to God for days afterwards that it was just a dream and not true.
This was back in 1986.
It is not just the Gardasil.
When she was 14 years old I had to put her on the pill because she would not stop bleeding. She has never been able to stop taking the pill.
At age 23 she went from a petit size 4 to size 16. She developed a hump on her back. I thought she had cushings.
It seems that there is also some thing called polycystic.
--- and how about that dream some 32 years ago. I never forgot it.
Posted by: Benedetta | June 12, 2018 at 09:46 PM
It is Inconceivable to think that parents who vaccinate their little girls against HPV (something not proven to have anything to do with cancer) might never be able to become grandparents.
Posted by: Shelley Tzorfas | June 12, 2018 at 12:17 PM
Worst Vaccine Ever? Disease Risk Soars 44.6 Percent
Questionable Tactics Used in Vaccine ‘Safety’ Testing
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2018/06/12/vaccine-safety-testing.aspx?utm_source=dnl&utm_medium=email&utm_content=art1&utm_campaign=20180612Z1_UCM&et_cid=DM213769&et_rid=334649135
By Dr. Mercola
In December 2017, Slate magazine published an astonishing article about the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine Gardasil, revealing how the safety trials for this controversial vaccine actually "weren't designed to properly assess safety."1 Gardasil is supposed to prevent infection by certain strains of HPV virus, which in rare cases may cause cervical cancer if left untreated.
However, trial data from Merck shows that Gardasil vaccinations may actually increase your risk of cervical cancer by 44.6 percent if you have been exposed to HPV strains 16 or 18 prior to vaccination.2 The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has made this document inaccessible, but we've saved a copy of it. In his Slate article, investigative journalist Frederik Joelving recounts the story of Kesia Lyng, a 30-year-old Danish woman who, at the age of 19, participated in a clinical trial for Merck's Gardasil vaccine
Posted by: Hans Litten | June 12, 2018 at 11:32 AM
Posted by: bob moffit | June 12, 2018 at 09:02 AM
Cervical cancer deaths are in very low numbers and occur in older women.
HPV has next to little or nothing to do with cervical cancer anyway.
Nothing justifies a mass vaccination drive like this other than.....
This , for me , was only ever about one thing.
Posted by: Hans Litten | June 12, 2018 at 09:37 AM
It is so sad to me that so many millions of mothers and fathers do not realized the dangers of any vaccines, let alone one was toxic as this. Doctors who complete their training and then clamp a lead allopathic helmet on their heads, not allowing anything else in, are, IMHO, complicit in medical malpractice. Don't get me started on the CDC. Should take it apart brick by brick.
Posted by: Carolyn Long | June 12, 2018 at 09:32 AM
Whether intentional or not .. the HPV vaccine is proving to be very successful at "controlling population growth". In fact, it is probably more effective at controlling the population than it is likely to be at controlling HPV itself.
Either way .. BOTH results are extremely profitable for all vested interests
Posted by: bob moffit | June 12, 2018 at 09:02 AM
Ian Frazer is the name of the infamous person behind this CAH.
This is actually astounding.
Proof (as if we needed it).
Posted by: Hans Litten | June 12, 2018 at 07:58 AM