Tracy Kettering PhD BCBA-D on Increasing Autism Numbers in New Jersey
Frustration Lasts Long After April

Study: Increased Rates of Cervical Cancer in Sweden Linked to Increase in HPV Vaccinations

HPV-test-alone-OK-cervical-cancer-screening-1440x810(Please see addendum)

Study: Increased Rates of Cervical Cancer in Sweden Linked to Increase in HPV Vaccinations


By Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

A new study published in the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics examined cervical cancer rates among women in Sweden and discovered a link between increased cervical cancer rates among women aged 20-49 during a two-year period between 2014 and 2015, corresponding to increased HPV vaccination rates in this population group, years earlier, when mass HPV vaccinations started in Sweden.

Women above the age of 50, during this two-year period, saw no significant cervical cancer increase and were likely too old to have been vaccinated with the HPV vaccine.

Since the study casts doubt on the efficacy of the HPV vaccine, and, in fact, links the vaccine to increased cancer rates, it is highly unlikely you will read about this in the U.S. corporate-sponsored media, where nothing negative about the blockbuster HPV Gardasil vaccine is allowed.

The study was conducted by Lars Andersson, PhD, from the Department of Physiology and Pharmacology at the Karolinska Institute in Solna, Sweden.

Dr. Andersson states that:

…when the Swedish media discussed the increase in the incidence of cervical cancer, the health authorities were unable to explain the increase.

So Dr. Andersson discussed the possibility that mass HPV vaccination rates actually could be the cause of increased rates of cervical cancer:

HPV vaccination could play a role in the increase in the incidence of cervical cancer. About 25% of cervical cancers have a rapid onset of about three years including progression from normal cells to cancer.

Therefore, an increase may be seen within a short period of time.

Gardasil was approved in Sweden in 2006. In 2010, the vaccination of a substantial number of girls started. In 2010, about 80% of the 12-year-old girls were vaccinated.

Combined with 59% of the 13–18-year-old girls vaccinated through the catch-up programme in the same period, one can say that most girls were vaccinated.

Thus, the oldest girls in the programme were 23 years old in 2015; and this is well within the younger age group shown in Fig. 1.

Dr. Andersson points out that even the FDA’s own analysis of Gardasil in 2006 showed a higher risk of “premalignant cell changes” from the vaccine in certain groups that had already been exposed to some HPV strains:

Read more here.


Controversy has arisen around the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics article because the author had submitted under a false name to escape professional persecution. After consideration the the journal's editors decided not to retract the article and made the following statement:-

On May 8, the KI informed us that its department of physiology and pharmacology did not have any person of this name and requested us to remove the name of the institution. So, on the same day a correction was carried out and the name of KI was removed and duly intimated to KI.

Since then, we have investigated and learned the identity of the author. The author has said that he used a pseudonym because he believed the use of his real name would have invited personal repercussions from those opposed to any questioning of vaccines.

This deception of the journal’s editors is unacceptable. The author could have asked the editors for confidentiality, giving the reasons. Editors may choose to publish articles without revealing the true name of the author, if it is determined that the circumstances justify it.

However, we considered the matter and decided to keep the article on the site as the issues raised by it are important and discussion on it is in the public interest. The author’s true name is withheld at his request.




Jeannette Bishop

"Retracted"... more evidence that vaccine risks research is not even allowed... unless you find nothing problematic even if via methods of fraudulentology... then that's just fine...

Hans Litten

Dublin 2018 IFICA conference on HPV Gardasil Vaccination :

Dr. Sin Hang Lee’s responses to Dr. Brenda Corcoran’s comments on the IFICA meeting made on South East Radio’s Morning Mix – Monday 23rd April 2018. As an invited speaker at the IFICA meeting held on 21st April 2018 in Dublin, I felt obliged to respond to the authoritative public comments about mass HPV vaccination of young girls for cervical cancer prevention by Dr. Brenda Corcoran, Head of Ireland’s National Immunisation Office broadcast through South East Radio’s Morning Mix – Monday 23rd April 2018. The radio statements made by Dr. Corcoran are quoted in my responses as follows: Dr. Corcoran’s statement “HPV is a virus that causes cervical cancer” is half-true at best. The accurate statement should be that persistent infection by certain specific genotypes of HPV validated by L1 gene DNA sequencing carries the risk of developing invasive cervical cancer [1]. HPV is not one virus. There are at least 150 genotypes of HPV and more than 40 HPV types or subtypes are commonly found in humans. Most of HPV infections and even repeated transient infections by the high-risk HPV genotypes do not lead to cervical cancer. “HPV is a virus that causes cervical cancer” is a slogan commonly used to market HPV vaccines by the industry. The fact that “every year 90 women die and 300 get a diagnosis of invasive Cervical Cancer” in Ireland indicates a need to improve women’s health care because cervical cancer is primarily a disease among unscreened or rarely screened women. [2] “Cervical cancer is nearly 100 percent preventable”, as testified by Nancy C. Lee, M.D. Associate Director for Science, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, before the U.S. House Committee on Commerce, Subcommittee on Health and Environment on March 16, 1999. That testimony was made before any HPV vaccines were introduced into the market. In Ireland, “6,500 get a diagnosis of a pre-cancer that needs to have treatment - and that is diagnosed on a smear and that may lead to infertility problems or long lasting problems.” For the best women’s health care, each of these 6,500 cases should be reviewed for possible unnecessary overtreatment because more than 95% of referrals to colposcopy for diagnostic workup may be false positive and/or potentially excessive in that they are in fact performed on healthy women or women who have CIN 1 lesions. Under current industry-driven practice guidelines, screening with combined cytologic and HPV testing, regardless of patient age, leads to the highest number of excessive colposcopic referrals. [3] The statement “The vaccine we are offering protects against 7 out of 10 cervical cancers” needs a peer-reviewed reference to support its accuracy. The truth is that there is no proof that HPV vaccination has prevented a single case of cervical cancer in any countries. “The Expectation is that the vaccine will protect against all head and neck cancers and all HPV related cancers which both boys and girls get” is just a great expectation. Since head and neck cancers were not part of the scope of the clinical trials, this claim falls under the category of "off-label marketing" and should not be used as the basis for making health care policies. Dr. Corcoran’s declaration “We know that HPV causes these cancers, so, if we stop people from getting the HPV infection by vaccinating you will stop the cause of these Cancers” is not based on facts. We may not stop people from getting HPV infection by vaccination let alone stopping the cause of these cancers by vaccination. It is unfortunate that a 25-year girl has developed incurable cervical cancer, in Ireland. The question to ask is: Why this girl did not have proper gynecological care before the invasive cervical cancer was diagnosed? Was she unable to pay for the needed regular gynecological care in Ireland? Was the
HPV test not sensitive enough for the screening? Did the Pap smear tests miss the precancerous cells? Incurable cervical cancer does not appear suddenly without a preceding period in the form of abnormal Pap smears or a persistent HPV infection. In the United States, this would be a case of multi-million dollars malpractice lawsuit against the health care providers. Dr. Corcoran may consider initiating an official enquiry on this case, instead of using this occasion to market a vaccine. “There is evidence that the vaccine works, if you look at Australia, they are talking about eliminating or getting rid of Cervical cancer altogether”. Dr. Corcoran is probably not aware that Australian Olympic medalist Sarah Tait died from cervical cancer at the age of 33, even though she was vaccinated with Gardasil at a younger age. Dr. Beller of Israel reported in 2009 that two young women developed invasive cervical cancer shortly after receiving HPV vaccination in a clinical trial and urged precaution about relying on using this vaccine to prevent cancer. [4] Dr. Corcoran questioned the suggestion of “Why not enhance the Cervical Screening program”. I recommend that Dr. Corcoran read the Testimony on Cervical Cancer by Nancy C. Lee, M.D. Associate Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Before the House Committee on Commerce, Subcommittee on Health and Environment March 16, 1999. The then CDC associate director testified that screening and treating precancerous lesions actually prevents cervical cancer from ever developing. There is no evidence that HPV vaccination can replace cervical screening for cervical cancer prevention. Dr. Corcoran’s comment “The speakers at that conference are not regarded by the overwhelming scientific body as having the normal opinions on HPV vaccines” is creating an authority of “overwhelming scientific body” which apparently includes herself to endorse a set of “normal opinions on HPV vaccines” in order to suppress dissenting evidence. However, this strategy will not work in the current informational era because the internet through the widely available personal computers has now given the public the power of knowledge. There is no more absolute scientific or medical authority in this day and age. There is a group of Irish parents whose formerly healthy daughters have developed some serious illness after HPV vaccination. They are looking for answers and help which the overwhelming scientific body cannot offer with their normal opinions on HPV vaccination. It is a medical issue to these parents. They want to know why and how these medical conditions are related to HPV vaccines from any sources, including the speakers invited to speak at the 21st April IFICA conference. These speakers at that conference can be regarded by Dr. Corcoran as irrelevant. But the messages delivered by these speakers may carry the truth which Dr. Corcoran cannot conveniently dismiss. Dr. Corcoran stated “We are looking at facts about the vaccine" and “The vaccine contains a small portion of the virus that causes the immune system to develop antibodies, so in the future if you come in contact with the HPV virus those antibodies will defend you today from developing the cancer”. Since Dr. Corcoran steps into HPV vaccine and antibodies, let us look at the facts of HPV vaccinology: 1. It is well known that HPV evades the host immune system. HPV antibody levels induced after natural infection are very low. Specially designed HPV vaccines are needed to elicit highly augmented immune responses of the host to generate sustained high levels of HPV antibodies [5]. 2. Gardasil is a recombinant quadrivalent vaccine prepared from the purified virus-like particles (VLPs) of the major capsid (L1) protein of HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18. It is not “a small portion of the virus”, as claimed by Dr. Corcoran. Since VLPs without the naturally packaged DNA are poorly antigenic, a special aluminum salt that can loosely bind anionic phosphate Toll-like receptor agonists (ligands) which serve as molecular adjuvant is needed to augment the innate immune response of the host to enhance antibody productions. [6-8] 3. In Cervarix, the disclosed Toll-like receptor 4 agonist is 3-0-descyl-4'-monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) isolated from a strain of Salmonella [7]. In Gardasil, a Toll-like receptor 9 agonist is used in the form of recombinant HPV L1 DNA fragments whose presence in the HPV vaccine has been confirmed by the FDA [9].

Hans Litten

Expert: vaccination can end cervical cancer within 20 years
Creator of HPV vaccine hopes crisis will encourage parents to have children immunised
Marie O'Halloran

Prof Ian Frazer, a co-creator of the HPV vaccine, says it protects against nine strains of virus which are together responsible for more than 95 per cent of cervical cancers. Photograph: Matt Kavanagh
The truth Ian-scoundrel is this isn't it :
Expert: Gardasil vaccination can clear Ireland within 20 years & return the land to forest !

Angus Files

Goody two shoes Pharma complicit in faking trials...aided and abetted by Eindecker

"What the pharmaceutical company should have done is inject one group with the vaccine and the other group with a non-vaccine placebo (i.e., saline)," writes Heinze. "What the pharmaceutical company did, instead, was inject one group with the hepatitis B vaccine, and the other group with a different vaccine. Then they monitored both groups and found that the recipients of their vaccine had 'no significant difference in the frequency or severity of adverse experiences' as compared to the recipients of other vaccines."

Whilst on trials I see that it is possible Eindecker et-al could be prosecuted under Superior orders committing genocide.
"The 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
Further information: States Parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
The pro­vi­sion con­tain­ing the su­pe­rior or­ders de­fense can be found as a de­fense to in­ter­na­tional crimes in the Rome Statute of the In­ter­na­tional Crim­i­nal Court. (The Rome Statute was agreed upon in 1998 as the foun­da­tional doc­u­ment of the In­ter­na­tional Crim­i­nal Court, es­tab­lished to try those in­di­vid­u­als ac­cused of se­ri­ous in­ter­na­tional crimes.) Ar­ti­cle 33, ti­tled "Su­pe­rior or­ders and pre­scrip­tion of law",[27] states:

1. The fact that a crime within the ju­ris­dic­tion of the Court has been com­mit­ted by a per­son pur­suant to an order of a Gov­ern­ment or of a su­pe­rior, whether mil­i­tary or civil­ian, shall not re­lieve that per­son of crim­i­nal re­spon­si­bil­ity unless:

(a) The person was under a legal obligation to obey orders of the Government or the superior in question;
(b) The person did not know that the order was unlawful; and
(c) The order was not manifestly unlawful.
2. For the pur­poses of this ar­ti­cle, or­ders to com­mit geno­cide or crimes against hu­man­ity are man­i­festly unlawful."

Under the Nuremberg trials which then caused the above law to spawn.Leaders right down to school teachers and less were being prosecuted and executed after the war for crimes committed.Their defence was "we were just doing our job" which was deemed at the time no defence so prosecuted and executed mostly.

Since then the above laws came to pass"Standing Orders" but saying, you were just doing your job Eindecker is not going to be an excuse when your day comes for assisting genocide.

Pharma For Prison


John Stone


The two references to substitute placebos leave one wondering whether you have the re