I've already just posted this link elsewhere on AoA, but looking at page 4 of the letter below and some of the recommendations for market expansion in the report highlighted in this post, I'm seeing potential tie-ins:

http://electromagnetichealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Pall-Martin-Ltr-to-Gov-Brown-092317.pdf

here this is from the WP archives, very interesting.

http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost_historical/search.html

year 1945 - Spraying District With DDT Thought Useless as Polio Gains

A DDT insecticide war on infantile paralysis would be impractical in Washington, local health officials said yesterday following an announcement that eight new cases of the disease had been diagnosed here over the week-end.

year 1945 - DDT Sprayed on City by Plane In Test to Check Polio Spread

Rockford, Ill., Aug. 19 (U.P.). -- A B-25 bomber, on a mission of mercy rather than death, roared down over Rockford today and released 1100 gallons of the war-developed DDT insecticide in an experiment to control an outbreak of infantile paralysis.

Year 1945 - Plane to Spray Town Today In Polio Test

Rockford, Ill., Aug. 18 (U.P.). -- An Army bomber comes here tomorrow to spray this town with the wonder insecticide, DDT, in the first large scale experiment with the theary that the common house fly spreads the virus of infantile paralysis.

year 1945 - Polio Value of DDT Still Experimental

Year 1948 -40% OF 1948'S Paralysis Victims Are Apparently Well Again

GREATER WASHINGTON has had approximately 170 polio cases this year, and doctors estimate that 40 per cent of them have apparently recovered without after-effects.

Year 1955 - 3 Scientists Urge Halt Of Vaccine Production

Three scientists, one a Nobel Prize winner, recommended to Congress yesterday an immediate stop to present anti-polio vaccine making -- until a "safer" vaccine can be developed.

Year 1976 - Oral Vaccine Said Causing Polio Cases

Four medical scientists told a Senate hearing yes terday that oral polio vaccine has caused nearly all of the few reported cases of poliomyelitis since 1961 and is riskier than no vaccine at all. While saying that the oral vaccine should remain available for limited purposes, they urged a return to the injected, killed-virus vaccine that lowered the U.S. incidence of polio by 95 per cent between the early 1950s and 1961.

Eindecker & Freddie (I guess this finishes the NP argument !)

University of California Admits Polio Vaccine Causes Most Polio Cases

https://vaxxter.com/university-of-california-admits-polio-vaccine-causes-most-polio-cases/

“It’s actually an interesting conundrum. The very tool you are using for [polio] eradication is causing the problem,” says Raul Andino, a professor of microbiology at the University of California at San Francisco.

Go on , ask me , am I feeling smug ? The answer is YES !

Hera,

Did you read the methods section of your link on polio outbreaks?

"Only those outbreaks that represented a > 2.5-fold increase
in the incidence of paralytic disease or occurred in the context of
the complete absence of reported cases during the 12-month period
preceding the index case were included in this report."

You're confusing those numbers with worldwide numbers of paralytic polio.

Eindecker;

Thank you for identifying your source,;this does make it easier. Like Pharmster ( thanks for finding the study,Pharmster!) I have big questions about the extremely small numbers of paralysis that WHO has found, compared to what other sources identify as the numbers being paralysed by NPAFP in 2011
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22591873
"Polio programme: let us declare victory and move on."
From the article
In 2011, there were an extra 47,500 new cases of NPAFP. Clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly, the incidence of NPAFP was directly proportional to doses of oral polio received.

Frederick Chopin;
You may also find this interesting.
Outbreaks of Paralytic Poliomyelitis, 1976-1995
https://academic.oup.com/jid/article-pdf/175/Supplement_1/S165/2607164/175-Supplement_1-S165.pdf
From the article.
During 1976-1995, 48 outbreaks of paralytic poliomyelitis with a cumulative total of ~17,000
cases were reported worldwide.

Why were there so few cases of paralysis in India and other third world countries during a time when vaccination wasn't occuring?
Per the article
"Nevertheless, circumscribed epidemics occur
much less commonly in developing countries because of frequent
exposure to wild polioviruses during the first few months
f life, when the risk of paralytic disease is substantially lower
than in older age groups [98, Ill]. High rates of endemic
infection also prevented the accumulation ofthe large numbers
of susceptible persons required to sustain a sudden and dramatic
increase in transmission that has become the hallmark of polio
epidemics [109]."

Compare this with the numbers of NPAFP more reecently
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/135/Supplement_1/S16.2

Although the incidence of polio acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) has decreased in India, the nonpolio AFP (NPAFP) rate has increased. Nationwide, the NPAFP rate is 11.82 per 100 000 population, whereas the expected rate is 1 to 2 per 100 000 population. We examined the correlates of NPAFP to discern explanations for the increase. The incidence of polio AFP in India has decreased. However, the nonpolio AFP rate has increased since 2000. Follow-up of these cases of nonpolio AFP is not done routinely. However, one-fifth of these cases of nonpolio AFP in the state of Uttar Pradesh (UP) were followed up after 60 days in 2005; 35.2% of patients were found to have residual paralysis, and 8.5% had died. This suggests that the pathology in children being registered as having nonpolio AFP cannot be considered trivial

So if we do run the numbers, Frederick Chopin, it appears we comparing 17 000 worldwide cases of polio induced paralysis over a span of almost 20 years, prior to the India vaccination program,with now as many as 47,500 cases of NPAFP in a single year.

Maybe we are better at counting, but the differnece in numbers is tremendous,.

In the end, if a program increases the chance of paralysis in such huge amounts, is there any way that we can call it a success?
(Your assumption of 13 million polio cases compared to 750 cases resulting from the polio vaccine sounds good, but that is not what is happening.In fact, the numbers of paralyzed people is going horrendously the other way.)

Hera,

You're saying you'd rather have 13 million cases of paralytic polio than 760 cases of vaccine-induced polio. But you're not going to admit that. You're going to argue about the numbers.

Eindecker the source for your numbers is below.

I do not think there is a good way to estimate the risks. They rely on reported cases.

The number of total reported cases including non-vaccine ones is just 395 (acute persistent
spinal paralysis) over a period of 5 years for a population of over 500 million.

Then they have a definition that the onset that has a time window of 23 days after vaccination or 2 months for someone who was infected by a vaccinee otherwise it is counted as non-vaccine related.

If the virus spreads in the population there is no way any associated health problems will be counted as vaccine related.

I will say the vaccine safety studies will tend to seriously underestimate the true risks. You always have to look how the safety studies are done and how they collect the data. Just copying from a "reliable" source and believing it is not enough.

One of the ways they keep the numbers low is to rely on reports. We all know that VAERS will miss 99% of cases. Then you have a very small time window in which you allow problems to be counted as vaccine related. Then you predefine what effects are allowed to be associated with a vaccine and use narrow diagnostic criteria.

I will say a lot of these vaccine safety numbers are simply fiction that look nice on paper. People believe them because they have WHO logo come with them or are supposed to come from a reliable source like the CDC.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2491155/pdf/bullwho00071-0060.pdf

Hera this is the source of my information: http://www.who.int/features/qa/64/en/ This ref illustrates the lengths WHO goes to track down and identify possible VDPV http://www.who.int/ihr/polio1993en.pdf . BTW I italicize text to show this is not my opinion but text taken from a reliable source.
Here's one of the original, older, studies on the more risky trivalent OPV quantifying the risks of VDPV infection: Esteves K. Safety of oral poliomyelitis vaccine: results of a WHO enquiry. Bull WHO 1988;66:739-746. "A WHO collaborative study during 1980 to 1984 found that the number of cases among OPV recipients and contacts of vaccine recipients was about one case per 3.3 million doses of trivalent OPV distributed or administered in 8 countries (Esteves 1988). These data are in agreement with other such studies. In the USA the overall frequency of vaccine associated poliomyelitis has remained stable since the mid-1960s, with one case per 2.5 million doses of trivalent OPV distributed during 1980 to 1989."

Freddie & Einey - will you be there ? Too good to miss - See you there !
Julie Gerberding, Woman of the Year Award – Protest Event

The angel of death ?

https://www.naturalblaze.com/2018/04/time-to-expose-md-julie-gerberding-former-cdc-director-for-her-role-in-cdcs-vaccine-fraud.html

Time To Expose MD Julie Gerberding, Former CDC Director, For Her Role In CDC’s Vaccine Fraud

The protest, which has a proper permit to occur, will gather across the street from the NYC Hilton to show Dr. Gerberding, the CDC, the media and the public that SHE is not deserving of such an honor due to the apparent fraudulent work she condoned while at the CDC by hiding and promoting false vaccine research, which CDC epidemiologist whistleblower William Thompson, PhD, pointed out and informed her about. Gerberding, however, neutralized Thompson, the lead researcher on that project, and turned the project over to Dr. Frank DeStefano, who apparently, and obligingly, promulgated the fraud further to Gerberding’s apparent instructions and an observably planned agenda. It was Coleen Boyle, PhD, who reported directly to Dr. Gerberding, who apparently gave the orders to Thompson’s team to discard the MMR data implicating that vaccine’s involvement in Autism in young black boys less than three years of age!

Hera, does this help clarify matters?
Since 2000, more than 10 billion doses of OPV (oral polio vaccine) have been administered to nearly 3 billion children worldwide. As a result, more than 13 million cases of polio have been prevented, and the disease has been reduced by more than 99%. During that time, 24 cVDPV (circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus) outbreaks occurred in 21 countries, resulting in fewer than 760 VDPV cases.
Until 2015, over 90% of cVDPV cases were due to the type 2 component in OPV. With the transmission of wild poliovirus type 2 already successfully interrupted since 1999, in April 2016 a switch was implemented from trivalent OPV to bivalent OPV in routine immunization programmes. The removal of the type 2 component of OPV is associated with significant public health benefits, including a reduction of the risk of cases of cVDPV2.
The small risk of cVDPVs pales in significance to the tremendous public health benefits associated with OPV. Every year, hundreds of thousands of cases due to wild polio virus are prevented. Well over 10 million cases have been averted since large-scale administration of OPV began 20 years ago.
Circulating VDPVs in the past have been rapidly stopped with 2–3 rounds of high-quality immunization campaigns. The solution is the same for all polio outbreaks: immunize every child several times with the oral vaccine to stop polio transmission, regardless of the origin of the virus.

For Beatrice Lorenzin (and your high school diploma)

https://principia-scientific.org/world-renowned-lab-silenced-after-disturbing-vaccine-discovery/

They had touched the third rail of medicine.
They had crossed the no-go zone with the purported crime being scientific research and discovery. By finding nano-contamination in random vaccines, Gatti and Montanari revealed, for the first time, what no one knew: Vaccines had more than aluminum salts adjuvants, Polysorbate-80, and other inorganic chemicals in them, they also harbored stainless steel, tungsten, copper, and other metals and rare elements that don’t belong in shots given to fetuses, pregnant women, newborns, babies and toddlers developing their lungs, immune and nervous systems.”

No Benedetta, you did not have smallpox, you had a vaccinia virus infection, vaccinia is not the same as the smallpox virus variola, if you want to read a good account of the history, and risks, of vaccinia vaccine try https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1069029/ Inadvertent inoculation is the most common adverse event associated with smallpox vaccination. It occurred at a rate of 529 per million vaccinations in a 1968 study.20 Inadvertent or accidental inoculation usually occurs when a person transfers the vaccinia virus from the vaccination site to another location on their body, usually the eyes, mouth, nose, or genitalia.

Eindecker:
I had small pox.
I was given the small pox vaccine starting in the first grade in 1962, when I was six years old..
At the end of the third grade, on a nice spring day; I sat on the top balcony of the gym, and watched all the little kids, that would be attending first grade, the next coming school year; receive their vaccines.

Two weeks later I was in isolation ward in the hospital. I was delirious for several days, and was in the isolation ward for another two weeks. .
I had small pox.
They thought that I would be scared for life.
I was a solid blister.
But I got better with only a few scars, that are still will me to this day, on various parts of my body. .
The three doctors agreed that since my skin cleared up it was cow pox version of small pox used in the small pox vaccine.
There were two types of small pox all along. During Jenner's time there were two types of small pox viruses. Which I am pretty sure our ancestors knew all along. Probably why one town in England back a couple of hundred years ago, refused to have any more of the small pox vaccines, period. Jenner's version might have been worse than what was naturally going around, and worse spreading it.
We know very little about the microbe world, and even less about real history. We know only what we have been told and mostly it is slanted, and twisted.

My own parents did not receive their small pox vaccine until they were 10 years old.
When something leaves a permanent mark on your shoulder; you kind of remember when it was given to you.
In spite of that rather late age of receiving the small pox vaccine, my parents knew of no one that had small pox except some boy in some school off in some far off neighboring community.

As far as polio goes; Why did three stomach viruses that caused no problems for years, suddenly start causing sporadic epidemics in which if they did not out right kill, then would leave ever lasting disabilities?

Worse still: Will it happen again, that another benign virus will turn lethal?

My best friend in grade school woke up one morning, and could not move her neck, or arms. She too was put in the hospital. She too had a polio like disease, not caused by any of the three polio viruses but by the coxsackie virus. In recent years the hand, foot, and mouth disease caused by the coxsackie virus has become very common place in our children. My friend's grandchildren are all getting it.

We have people like Paul Offit that says; vitamins are bad especially vitamin C; and that our babies can take endless numbers of vaccine and be okay. That is simply not true.
We as a human race can not take endless numbers of vaccines for every microbe out there cause if nothing else there is not enough time in the day to do so.

Consider that according to the big, impressive, meeting by the gut microbiome scientists at the National Institute of Health' vaccines are like a sledge hammer to the gut microbiome. A vaccine might not just target the one and only problematic microbe,. but some other microbe that is; if not out right necessary ; will at least fill a niche, and crowd out some unhealthy microbe.

But boy; what a money maker it could be if the powers that be, could make and sell and give a vaccine for every microbe out there, and if that could happen, then there is all those mutating microbes. Endless, until there is not humans left to take them, or give them.

Eindecker thank you for the link but as you know it has no basis in reality.Sadly where Jenners vaccination death cult,visited,death increased.It just depends in who you wish to believe Pharma sales rhetoric or real government figures from independent sources.

"In England and Wales, free vaccination was provided for smallpox in 1840, made compulsory in 1853, and in 1867 orders were given to prosecute evaders, therefore, few escaped vaccination. Deaths from smallpox in England and Wales during 1857-59 was recorded at 14,244; in 1863-65, 20,059; and 1870-72, 44,840.

Between the 1st and 2nd epidemic, there was only a 7% increase in population with an increase of smallpox deaths by 40.8%. During the 2nd and 3rd epidemic a 9% increase of population with an increase of smallpox deaths of 123% with an ever-multiplying number of vaccinations! Deaths per year from cancer in England and Wales between 1857-72 also began to rapidly increase."

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/01/02/was-smallpox-vaccine-really-a-great-success.aspx

Pharma For Prison

MMR RIP

Angus let's cut your blathering, you wrote ".You state from 1943 but there is loads of smallpox records prior to this but hardly any deaths. I gave you reference to some sporadic outbreaks in Scotland in the early 20C that the author concluded in 1943 were brought under control by vaccination>
Since you maintain smallpox wasn't a killer until after the introduction of Jenner's vaccine here's the situation pre-Jenner and after the introduction of vaccination in two London church yards
Smallpox mortality seems to have peaked in London in the 1760s, before declining slowly, and then rapidly after 1800 (both as a proportion of burials, and as absolute numbers of burials reported in the London Bills) (figure 1). The rapid decline in smallpox burials after 1800 coincided with the widespread adoption of Jenner's cowpox vaccination method, and despite incomplete coverage and low levels of re-vaccination, vaccination programmes succeeded in reducing smallpox to a relatively minor cause of death by the beginning of civil registration in 1837.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4373148/

If you can bear it look at Fig 1 Angus, pre-vaccination smallpox accounted for about 10% of burials, it was a major killer in late 18C England.

Frederick Chopin,

If you have been reading the literature about the OPV ( live polio vaccine) I am kind of surprised that you missed the fact that this is what is spreading polio.I am talking about vaccine derived polio and vaccine derived polio viral spread.In fact it is being commonly discussed in the literature, that vaccine derived polio is both causing cases of polio, and spreading and in some cases mutating into more virulent forms through vaccine polio carriers.

The paralysis that is spreading like wildfire in places like India, and that per a study linked in a previous comment, increases with live polio vaccination is almost certainly being caused by the live polio vaccine.

here is the quote again; you can find the study a couple of comments down

"NPAFP increased with the number of oral polio vaccine (OPV) doses used (R2 = 25.02%; P < .001). When effect of cumulative doses over the previous years was examined, the NPAFP rate in 2013 best correlated with the cumulative doses received in the previous 7 years (R2 = 57.16%), with 2012 excluded because data for this year were incomplete. This correlation was highly significant (P < .001). On multiple regression analysis, the number of OPV doses was the only factor that showed a positive correlation with the NPAFP rate. The average increase in the NPAFP rate was 1.31 per 100 000 population (P < .001; 95% confidence interval, 1.11–1.52) with each dose of OPV. The NPAFP rate in UP and Bihar, which had consistently increased each year until 2011, decreased in the 2 states in 2012, coinciding with a reduction in doses of OPV administered."

My previous comment ( which may well have been rambling;sorry!) was describing why your belief that of course they were identifying cases of vaccine derived polio accurately was probably wrong.

Angus ,don't let that pair of Jimmy one wingers Eindecker and Chopin sicken yer happiness whit type of smallpox are they blethering on about anyway [1] modified [2] Discrete [3] confluent] [4] or malignant .
Three articles I'm sure will be of interest to you .
[1] [PDF] Transformational Change in NHS Providers - The Health Foundation www. health.org uk sites transformationalchangeinnhsproviders.cc suppliment
[2] [PDF] Towards a Million Change Agents' Areview https/www.england.Nhs.Uk improvement
[3] The NHS Common Purpose .Towards aMillion Change Agents/Uk by Martin Edwards May 2013
The Pesky Care Quality Comissioners have got a note of their back bumper numbers and cap badges . They can expect to be getting unannounced spot check visits when they least expect them !
Do They Feel Lucky ? go on make ma day and keep ahead of the Industry/political gamblers twisters and lackies who would surely sell their own mothers and grannies in the same fashion as they did during the hitler youth movement of the 1930's

Well not so quick Eindeker- You, Chop ,Pharma talk about “vaccinating whole countries” your Pharma Correct(PC) words not mine. Scotland is part of the UK and would have been included in the whole UK figures and documented as such.You state from 1943 but there is loads of smallpox records prior to this but hardly any deaths. I know for a fact that my granny was “vaccinated at birth smallpox” in 1884 as that’s what`s written on her birth certificate.Back then your talking the real wilds of Scotland.If they reached here, back then, they certainly covered the whole of Scotland not just a selective town here and there.Your argument suggests seductiveness nope it was wall to wall carpet vaccination of the whole UK Eindecker . The various records show the biggest killer in Scotland back then due to the weather climate was TB not Smallpox. On further research I see AOA would have been very welcome in Jenners time,( I am not alone )and anti-vaccination campaigns were a lot more militant than they are now. Why ,you must ask yourself if your of fair mind Eindecker as you project to be? why as below were the population so against Jenner wanting his head snicked off! Prey tell me,was it because some sort of evil he was casting onto populations where there were no deaths from smallpox prior to vaccination but after vaccination deaths were occurring? It certainly seems the case. In the very poor recorded public health records that there are from Jenners time in Scotland ,I also read smallpox was often registered as chicken pox or measles as they had the same symptoms nausea, sore head, dizziness, and at worse delirium .Maybe the people noticed that they were not able to form a type 1 response anymore to the small pox vaccination and with only a type 2 response it wasn’t enough to kill the small word with the big lie behind it, hence making a pesky illness into Jenner cult death syndrom AKA vaccination. You see your argument has been turned on its head there were little or no deaths prior to smallpox vaccination . Where probably there were no deaths before Jenner appeared with his money spinning small name with a big lie.

http://broughttolife.sciencemuseum.org.uk/broughttolife/objects/display?id=5280

“Vaccination was a painful and occasionally deadly process, considered medically unproven by some and state intrusion by others. Were there other ways to protest? Local pressure groups and a National Anti-vaccination League fought the legislation. Rallies and public demonstrations were common. But since your father’s change in views, he would have missed the giant parade in Leicester in 1885, when up to 100,000 people marched with an effigy of Edward Jenner, the father of vaccination, which they hung and then decapitated.”

Pharma For Prison

MMR RIP

P.S.(Pharmascript) the link isn`t Whale your safe to click it.

Re the polio, to follow up, they do send a stool sample to see if there is polio in that ( having already decided that people who are vaccinated shouldn't be considered for a polio diagnosis, so we won't test their stool)..And that stool sample needs to be gathered very quickly, or they may not find polio anyway.

Of course, testing the sewerage system in multiple countries, has revealed the presence of multiple carriers of polio, whose stool shows they are carrying live virus derived from the polio vaccine.

In other less that cheering news, in some cases these carriers of OPV vaccine polio have actually caused the virus to mutate into a more dangerous form. perhaps that explains why people who have "Non Polio acute flaccid paralysis" NPAFP, have worse paralysis and a more likely to die, than those who are actually diagnosed with "Polio"

So we have vaccine produced carriers, spreading polio in their stool. In a country like India, with poor sanitation anyway, its hardly surprising that this is creating many cases of polio symptoms and paralysis.

Hi Frederick Chopin,
You asked Hans Litten about NPAFP, the paralysis that has been massively increasing in India with the oral polio vaccination program.
The thing is per the CDC
https://www.cdc.gov/polio/us/hcp.html
Acute flaccid paralysis is basically indistinguishable from "polio"
"Consider polio in patients who have unexplained AFP. A probable case of polio is defined as an acute onset of flaccid paralysis of one or more limbs with decreased or absent tendon reflexes in the affected limbs, without other apparent cause, and without sensory or cognitive loss. Paralysis usually begins in the arm or leg on one side of the body (asymmetric) and then moves towards the end of the arm or leg (progresses to involve distal muscle groups). This is described as descending paralysis. Many patients with AFP will have a lumbar puncture and analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) performed as part of their evaluation. Detection of poliovirus in CSF from confirmed polio cases is uncommon, and a negative CSF test result cannot be used to rule out polio."

So, how do we rule out whether the paralysis is polio or not? We can't use a lab test, per the CDC, to rule out polio, because it won't always stay in the CSF fluid.

In a ridiculous Catch 22 how we decide whether they have polio or not;

We ask if the person is vaccinated.

"Consider polio in patients with polio-like symptoms, especially if the person is unvaccinated and recently traveled abroad to a place where polio still occurs, or was exposed to a person who recently traveled from one of these areas."

Unvaccinated with paralysis and no polio in CSF = polio

So, vaccinated with the same paralysis and symptoms and no polio in CSF = polio. No. No.

They don't have "polio" because ; (even though they were vaccinated with something that can cause polio), they must have instead "Non Polio Acute Flaccid Paralysis."

And of course we all know that the Oral Polio Virus is a live virus that can both cause polio, and can also create live virus polio carriers for as long, in some cases, as 30 years.
We also know that we do not check for autoimmune syndromes that would result in someone becoming a polio carrier from the OPV vaccine, before we vaccinate, in India, or ( back when we used the OPV in America), we did not test for autoimmune diseases first here either.

So we vaccinate, knowing we are creating polio carriers. In vaccinated areas, there is a huge increase in paralysis. We know polio is hard to find in a lab result, even if it is the cause. So
the theory apparently is that some strange phenomena is causing many cases of polio symptoms at the same time, and in the same communities, as we are spreading the weakened live virus.

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/135/Supplement_1/S16.2

"NPAFP increased with the number of oral polio vaccine (OPV) doses used (R2 = 25.02%; P < .001). When effect of cumulative doses over the previous years was examined, the NPAFP rate in 2013 best correlated with the cumulative doses received in the previous 7 years (R2 = 57.16%), with 2012 excluded because data for this year were incomplete. This correlation was highly significant (P < .001). On multiple regression analysis, the number of OPV doses was the only factor that showed a positive correlation with the NPAFP rate. The average increase in the NPAFP rate was 1.31 per 100 000 population (P < .001; 95% confidence interval, 1.11–1.52) with each dose of OPV. The NPAFP rate in UP and Bihar, which had consistently increased each year until 2011, decreased in the 2 states in 2012, coinciding with a reduction in doses of OPV administered."

By the way, Hans Litten, thank you for cutting and pasting and including sources; it is really useful when people provide the sources of their statements!

Angus,

Intentionally or not (who knows?) you've created a strawman argument. I didn't say "the whole population has been vaccinated". What I said was the common AV claim that only 10% of the population was vaccinated during the eradication of smallpox was a myth.

Posted by: Frederic Chopin | April 17, 2018 at 10:07 AM

And you'll be soon be out of work with the freedom of speech lockdowns in pipeline.
What will you do then ?

EU planning to make it illegal to discuss immigration policy.
CaliforPANia planning to make it illegal to discuss the dark side of Pharma.
Fakebook, Gaggle & YouLie planning to block all content that challenges vaccination.

https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2018/04/09/california-bill-would-shut-down-free-speech/

https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2018/04/12/famous-figures-who-should-immediately-be-banned-by-facebook/

https://searchlight-germany.blogspot.co.uk/2018/04/swedish-feminists-want-to-ban-parties.html

Next thing you know the BBC will refuse to ever write the name William Thompson !
CDC whistleblower (who changed everything !) A damn hero (Brian Hooker too).

Posted by: Frederic Chopin | April 17, 2018 at 04:52 AM (this must hurt too)

http://vaccinepapers.org/high-aluminum-content-autistic-brains/

Accumulating evidence implicates aluminum adjuvants as a cause of autism. Autism is caused by inflammation in the brain during early development (gestation and first few years of life). The specific inflammation signals (i.e. cytokines) that cause autism are interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-17a (IL-17a). Aluminum adjuvants stimulate this specific type of inflammation in the brain.

There have been no epidemiological studies of Al adjuvant exposure and autism, except for one ecological study (Tomljenovic 2011). Ecological studies analyze aggregate, population-level data (e.g. comparing disease prevalence and exposures in a region or country). Ecological studies do not utilize data on individuals. For this reason, ecological studies are primarily for identifying hypotheses for further research. They are not worth much.

If Al adjuvant is responsible for much of the rise in autism, then autistics should have elevated brain aluminum levels. A new study (Mold et al 2017) by Dr Chris Exley’s research group provides the first-ever measurements of aluminum in autistic brains. In this article I show that the aluminum levels in autistic brains are abnormally high. Brain aluminum content is highly nonuniform, in healthy or diseased brains. Adjacent brain samples can have dramatically different Al concentrations. Consequently, many measurements and statistical methods are necessary to determine if aluminum is elevated or normal.

Angus,

You claimed only 10% ("at best") of people were vaccinated for smallpox and now you're talking about polio.

But your argument is if we go back 50,000 years to the dawn of Homo sapiens and start counting what percentage of the 107 billion people who have ever lived on Earth were vaccinated for smallpox we can say it was no more than 10%? That's how you guys come up with 10%?

Hans,

There's no question the NP (which stands for non-polio BTW) AFP rates have risen in India during the polio eradication program. But why do you, Hans Litten, think that's happened? You don't need to copy/paste anything.

Nice Try Freddie - wont work sunshine

http://www.healthfreedoms.org/has-bill-gates-polio-vaccine-program-cause-over-47000-paralysis-deaths/

Has Bill Gates’ Polio Vaccine Program Cause Over 47,000 Paralysis Deaths?

Do you want the link of an infowars reporter asking Billy the Kid directly about it ?
And Billys pathetic sidestep !

Talk about ridiculous comments:) We still vaccinate for polio because it's not yet eradicated (last year there were 22 wild type cases). And you're the UK editor of AoA ? Once it's eradicated we'll stop though, don't worry. Do you also believe we still vaccinate kids for smallpox? Gonna Google that?

Posted by: Frederic Chopin | April 15, 2018 at 04:38 PM

----------------------------------------------------------

And 62,000 NPAFP cases right Freddie ? (or did you forget ? Alzheimers ?)
And who is "we" ?

Now you are being ridiculous, they will never stop , until they are made to !
Or they have wiped everyone out of course (including your bloodline)

Chop when only at best 10% of the world were only ever vaccinated for smallpox how could the vaccine have eradicated it?

Pharma For Prison

MMR RIP

Frederic believes we are living in a land of unicorns and rainbows where the pharmas exist to make people happy and healthy and not to make money.

if this is so how can we explain this:

Merck covers up deadly Vioxx effects while they kill tens of thousands
GSK engaging in bribery all around the world
Pharmas caught in massive price-fixing conspiracy
Knowingly marketing deadly antipsychotics to the elderly
Hiding increased suicides from SSRIs while marketing them for children
Creating a population of opioid drug addicts
Knowingly selling HIV contaminated blood products

It is just a business what else do you think it is?

Go Trump.
We were able to extend the life of our toner cartridge by covering the sensor. Might work for you. All the best.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8xk6S8QxPE

https://lifehacker.com/5863700/get-more-pages-out-of-your-printer-when-the-toner-is-low-by-covering-the-sensor

Fred. Your comments re 'an investment company' sums up your attitude, i.e. 'what does health (both mental and physical) matter, as long as we make money for our shareholders?'

I don't know why you even bother to comment on this site because it is obvious that you cannot understand the distress of families who are suffering from the devastating effects of vaccine injury and we, certainly, cannot understand someone who argues that making a profit for shareholders is more important than health.

I can only assume you comment to relieve your boredom

This piece need to be widely circulated. I have already forwarded to three of my friends who usually donate for “cures” and “walks”. Big Pharma need to be fought at every level.

An analysis in 2010 found that two thirds of American medical research was commercially funded, a fraction that has continued to increase subsequently, and the result has been one of the greatest tragedies in human history.

Jeannette

I recall a talk by Paul Shattock more than 20 years ago in a freezing local church hall in which he complained that genetic research was swallowing all the money to no purpose, and he had every expectation that this would go on - Paul was perhaps more interested in organo-phosphates than vaccines - but it was a hideously accurate prophecy. In 2006 Francis Collins - still head of the human genome project - admitted to Congress that the rise in autism was not a genetic phenomenon but still the waste and distraction continued when he became head of NIH. Today, after three decades of yearly expanding human damage, official science has made no progress either with identifying the causes or finding cures. It might not have mattered if they had simply wasted billions of dollars, but they have wasted millions of lives, and it is hard not to conclude that they did it deliberately.

John, they're an investment company. They invest in and recommend investing in projects that generate the most revenue. They aren't part of the big conspiracy.

@Cia:

"Homeopathy is as inexpensive as vitamin C, and could treat and cure millions, humans or animals, of anything they had. Just another medical crime that allopathy has been waging war on it only to protect its own prestige and profits for over a century. "

I enjoy reading your comments, but to me, this last one is one of the best comments you've ever written. And - I completely agree. Homeopathy literally saved our son.

@Mr. Stone, I assume the business new sources very likely communicate more effectively with you than with my addled brain. I mostly get this something-doesn't-add-up feeling (which maybe should be the telling part) or maybe something-doesn't-add-up-comfortably and it too often drives me away, but taking your advice and looking at this a second time...

"The potential to deliver 'one shot cures' is one of the most attractive aspects of gene therapy, genetically-engineered cell therapy and gene editing. However, such treatments offer a very different outlook with regard to recurring revenue versus chronic therapies," analyst Salveen Richter wrote in the note to clients Tuesday. "While this proposition carries tremendous value for patients and society, it could represent a challenge for genome medicine developers looking for sustained cash flow."

Is the above their way of saying, "you know all the money we've directed into genetics" (instead of environmental research that some crazy autism parents want, for instance) ..."well, it's not going to amount to as much as you were led you to believe?"..."but of course, that's not because there are problems with it or anything...it's because we have to make money...?"

Isn't the discussion regarding concerns about "blended up" DNA fragments in our vaccines (fetal and animal, I think) founded upon the failure to control where the DNA fragments go in gene therapy (or am I mis-conflating, and oversimplifying)? It sounded to me like vaccine safety advocates were saying that they've abandoned gene therapy largely because of this problem (is that another explanation that doesn't add up)?

Also, should we expect for unspecified reasons epidemics of hemophilia, SMA, and "genetic" eye disorders (but not because of any environmental changes GS may be invested in...of course)?

@Tim Lundeen,

Exactly right. That is one of the ways that medical establishment keeps down "disruptive" technologies, such as high dose Vitamin C. Claim that they require more studies. Expensive studies which nobody has the financial incentive to fund. We can't just allow the doctors and patients decide what they want to do, right?

Besides for stalling, in the case of something like vitamin C which can't be outright banned, you have the banning of threatening approaches, prohibitions against advertising competing methods, etc. Not to mention not teaching any of this stuff in medical school. The monopoly is maintained in many different ways.

My gut feeling is this report is not for "us" exactly, more like for the consciences of those who will be employed in a system which may be seeing (if we just let the currently trajectory continue) rapidly falling life expectancy and fertility and "healthcare" depleted pensions and maybe essentially increasing homelessness for most of "us" and possibly more and more cures kept under wraps. This line of reasoning is so one can tell oneself "it just has to be this way," I think.

There could be money in cures if the consumer could be free to demand cures over other options (and demanded the option to choose to try anything at their own risk) and providers free to provide the available options. A free internet would really facilitate this IMO.

Also, there would be even more overall money, some say way more money, from a healthy, productive innovating population for investors themselves, the directions that wealth takes in society might be less predictable/controllable maybe, so I have to assume that GS investors aren't really interested in seeing a rise in overall health, longevity, productivity and wealth, even their own. I think they are interested in a sick kind of control.

@David Weiner -- you are right on the money re monopolies.

For example, here's a fascinating study about using Vitamin C to treat sepsis: http://www.jccjournal.org/article/S0883-9441(17)31059-6/fulltext

After talking about all the failed treatment attempts for sepsis, all of which involved custom drugs that would have had very high prices, they look at Vitamin C.

Small-scale studies show that Vitamin C lowers mortality rates by 5 times (from 40% to 8%), and this is even at lower doses than recommended by Dr Klenner and other pioneers. Using Vitamin C with optimal dosing should lower mortality even more.

So what does the paper conclude? That "Further research is required to prove its [Vitamin C's] value in treatment...".

The reason drug trials use large numbers of patients is because new drugs usually have only small benefits, so you need a lot of patients to see them. But a 5x improvement is obvious with small trials, and is overwhelmingly likely to apply to larger numbers (p < 0.0000001 as they say).

Sane people would think that a 5x reduction in mortality doesn't need more study to become the standard of care. It's just unfortunate (for the medical business) that the treatment costs less than $50, instead of the thousands they could charge for patented drugs. Not to mention that officially using Vitamin C in the mainstream medical business might make people think they should try it for other things too.

This critique of our medical system is very true, but it is important to understand that this phenomenon can only really happen in a monopolistic system such as the one we have now. In an open, competitive system, entrepreneurs who find ways to cure people WILL be able to do so. This phenomenon is referred to by economists as creative destruction. It happens all the time in other industries in which there is more economic freedom. PC's destroyed the mainframe computer market. Netflix pushed out Blockbuster. And so on. Sure, these changes destroyed certain companies' revenue streams, but they created new revenue streams for others. This is how true economic advancement takes place.

And this is why economic freedom is so critical to health care. As long as we have the various licensing laws and regulations, the key players (doctors, pharma, equipment manufacturers, hospitals, etc.) will be able to use our health care system for their own purposes, not for the sake of its customers.

For anyone who wants to get a better understanding of how the laws and regulations lead to the cartels we have today, check out the outstanding documentary "Hoxsey: How Healing Becomes a Crime". It can be found on youtube.

Goldman Sachs is an investment company.

Christ Rock "Ain't no money in the cure, the money's in the medicine...that's how a drug dealer makes his money, on the comeback."

This is why a majority of industries employ a policy of "planned obsolescence" .. defined as "deliberately producing consumer goods that rapidly become obsolete and so require replacing, achieved by frequent changes in design, termination of the supply of spare parts, and the use of nondurable materials."

Happens all the time .. and, nowhere is the policy of planned obsolescence more apparent than the vaccine industry .. which would explain why vaccine manufacturers are ALWAYS "replacing" existing vaccines as obsolete .. requiring "new and improved" .. multi-dose vaccines .. thereby immediately denying public access to choose single dose vaccines.

These "multi-dose" vaccines are simply COST EFFECTIVE .. for pediatricians and manufacturers .. as is the use of Formaldehyde .. a well known toxin .. for providing longer-lasting shelf-life of the vaccines in which it is used. Neither "cost effectiveness" nor "shelf-life" have anything to do with protecting a child's health .. however ... both do a lot to protect the vaccine interests for increasing PROFIT MARGINS.

One example would be the MMR .. which was REQUIRED because the single dose measles, mumps and rubella vaccines that had just been recommended by Dr Wakefield for being safer .. were no longer available .. having been replaced by the only vaccine made available .. the MMR.