IPAK Board Member Josh Mazer's Letter Regarding HPV Vaccination in Maryland
European Medicines Agency Confirmed Gatti and Montanari Findings Last Year in BMJ Attack

JB Handley Continues to Expose the Lie of Aluminum Safety in Vaccines

AluminumNote: JB Handley is writing a book that delves into the astonishing science that proves the dangers of using aluminum as an adjuvant in vaccines. Science moves forward - one hopes.  As mercury as been removed from the bulk of the pediatric vaccine schedule, this equally nefarious metal has been added.  We know for a fact that our children are facing a very different childhood experience.  The CDC term "adverse childhood events" is new to the pediatric lexicon. However, while CDC considers outside events only, we need to look at what is going into our children. As so many of us, including JB, founder of Generation Rescue, have been saying for more than a decade. Thank you, JB.

From JB:

OH MY...GOD. If you ever needed an example of the close-minded, ignorant, safety-negligent AAP, here it is. Aluminum science has gone through a revolution in the past decade. Leading scientists of the world are literally screaming for a re-evaluation of the safety of aluminum and showing exactly how injected aluminum from vaccines can cause brain damage.

And, yet, the best the AAP can do when providing an "expert" witness is to provide the head of the Michigan AAP who thinks ingesting soluble aluminum and injecting aluminum hydroxide are the same thing, despite extensive research showing the dangers of injected aluminum adjuvant.

It would be like a psychologist testifying that ulcers are caused by worrying or an oncologist testifying that we still don't know if tobacco causes lung cancer. For parents, this is confusing as hell. Who are they supposed to believe? The pediatrician who believes the risks outweigh the benefits of vaccines 100% of the time, or the leading neurotoxicologists in the world? (I know who I'm going with!)

I have written extensively about the topic of aluminum in vaccines, which is likely a primary cause of all of this brain damage in children, because injected aluminum adjuvant triggers Immune Activation Events, which, if they happen during times of fragile brain development, can have devastating consequences. Here's an article on how absurd the FDA's aluminum "safety" studies are:

A lone FDA scientist could end the autism epidemic

And, here's an article that summarizes all the recent science on aluminum:

Did British scientists just solve the autism puzzle?

And, here are just a few quotes from aluminum scientists worldwide warning about the DANGERS of aluminum adjuvant. Dr. Teresa Holtrop of the Michigan AAP--you are CLUELESS and RECKLESS.

It appears that six scientists—none American—have stepped forward to sound the alarm loudly about the extreme danger of aluminum, and perhaps initiate a reckoning of the true cause of the autism epidemic once and for all. Dr. Chris Exley of Keele University; Drs. Romain Gherardi Guillemette Crepea of Université Paris Est Créteil; Drs. Christopher Shaw and Lucija Tomljenovic of the University of British Columbia; and Dr. Yehuda Shoenfeld of Tel Aviv University have all contributed to the understanding we now have of aluminum, and the way it appears uniquely able to trigger immune activation events in the brains of certain children, leading to autism. Looking at some of their quotes collectively will help you appreciate how bold their statements really are. This new scientific understanding of aluminum changes everything. For me personally, I feel like I finally have a plausible explanation for what happened to my son.

“Now, because I have seen the same cells that we will see at an injection site carrying a cargo of aluminum into the brain tissue of individuals who died with autism I would now say that we have to think very carefully about who receives a vaccine that includes an aluminum adjuvant. We need to think carefully, is this vaccine a life-saving vaccine or not? If it isn’t, don’t have it with an aluminum adjuvant.” - Dr. Chris Exley, Keele University (England), 2017

“Concerns about its [alum’s] safety emerged following recognition of its unexpectedly long-lasting biopersistence within immune cells in some individuals, and reports of chronic fatigue syndrome, cognitive dysfunction, myalgia, dysautonomia and autoimmune/inflammatory features temporally linked to multiple Al-containing vaccine administrations…In the context of massive development of vaccine-based strategies worldwide, the present study may suggest that aluminium adjuvant toxicokinetics and safety require reevaluation.” - Dr. Guillemette Crépeaux, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d’Alfort (France), 2016

“Thus alum and other poorly biodegradable materials taken up at the periphery by phagocytes circulate in the lymphatic and blood circulation and can enter the brain using a Trojan horse mechanism similar to that used by infectious particles. Previous experiments have shown that alum administration can cause CNS [central nervous system] dysfunction and damage, casting doubts on the exact level of alum safety.”- Dr. Romain K. Gherardi, Université Paris-Est Créteil (France), 2015

“…it is somewhat surprising to find that in spite of over 80 years of use, the safety of Al adjuvants continues to rest on assumptions rather than scientific evidence. For example, nothing is known about the toxicology and pharmacokinetics of Al adjuvants in infants and children…Yet, in spite of these observations children continue regularly to be exposed to much higher levels of Al adjuvants than adults, via routine childhood vaccination programmes.” - Dr. Chris Shaw, University of British Columbia (Canada), 2012

“continuously escalating doses of this poorly biodegradable adjuvant in the population may become insidiously unsafe, especially in the case of overimmunization or immature/altered blood brain barrier.” - Dr. Romain Gherardi, Université Paris-Est Créteil (France), 2013

“Experimental research has showed that alum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. Thus, efforts should be put in clarifying the potential threat of alum-containing vaccines.”- Dr. Yehuda Shoenfeld, Tel-Aviv University (Israel), 2013

“The problem with vaccine- derived aluminum is really twofold: It drives the immune response even in the absence of a viral or bacterial threat and it can make its way into the central nervous system. It is not really a matter of much debate that aluminum in various forms can be neurotoxic." - Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic, University of British Columbia (Canada), 2013



I mean I asked the guy running for state representative of my state. I was satisfied with his answer, and he won. Sorry it has been a very Long day, really long day.


I have done that. I asked your state rep last year his take on vaccines and making them mandatory.

He answered that they did not make the Amish and so he would not vote to change what we already have to make it worse.

I was satisfied with his answer.
However; I see that a pharmacist is running for a state position in the neighboring county. Twice I have asked him what his stance would be if big pharma approached him and the vote to mandate vaccines came up.

Twice he has not responded.

Angus Files

Morag a number of well known local faces for sure never met Fergie that I can recall .
The psyche wards are being closed one by one and not all of them were that bad Lochgilphead for one a Professor Nutt was working from here for a while using cannabis. I don`t believe the med`s help many, and it goes a bit further than just chemical imbalance..

"Who is in charge of the organisational asylums, basic health and safety risk assessments for meeting the "Totally bonkers "criteria?"

The annoying situation is when you have one organisation legally blaming the other and the middle man, person, business etc left with no other avenue.Then the two organisations who you would turn to for redress are quite happy to shift it back and forward between desks whilst sitting out their time until the nest promotion or retirement and the grievance never gets resolved or is resolved with minimal change, CHANGE IS BAD!! they would have you believe. This is the sad situation I am finding more and more ,redress is a dream of the past,, change dream on!.

And as always the familiar fox guarding the hen house...everything is just fine move along now, nothing to see here ...said Mr Fox.

I`ll go back and listen to Fergie now! a happier place.

Pharma For Prison


David Weiner

Boycotts of pharma products might be an effective strategy under other circumstances. But the problem here is that most of the costs of medicine, including pharma drugs, are paid for through 3rd parties (governments and so-called health insurers, mainly through employers).

In effect, we are being forced to support pharma through these 3rd party arrangements. We can abstain personally, but we will still need to pay for a large portion of others' consumption. We cannot really opt out.


Thanks Angus, see Army and NHS Trained Physiotherapist.
The Shinty Referee Fergie MacDonald youtube .

Aimee Doyle

@Benedetta - "How would you tackle it at the root"

I think the first thing would be to raise awareness that Pharma is the cause of the problem. Gather information about Pharma donations to Congress members and Senators - tell your Senators and Congressmembers that you don't want them to be bought. Do this at the state level as well. Publicize it online (since the media is bought as well). Get people to run for office who are not bought - and who can't be bought.

Identify who is ignoring the vaccine issue (e.g. Trump, Government Oversight Committee, Rep Bill Posey, state legislators) and hold them accountable through publicity. Flood their offices with phone calls, letters, emails... I'd include Democrats in this list, but since they're not in power right now, it's not as useful to try to hold them accountable.

Because even if Congressmembers, Senators, and state legislators who are pro-vax are voted out of office, it won't do much good if a new set of bought representatives take their place.

Anyway, some ideas. Just generally blaming "government" for the problem doesn't help anything.

Angus Files

Morag the duplicity of it all very sad. Professor Exley getting to the bare bones Offit as he always does..

"The aluminium adjuvant used in the Gardasil HPV vaccine is a sulphated version of aluminium hydroxyphosphate and is likely, based upon what we know about aluminium chemistry, to be even more toxic."


Pharma For Prison



Thanks Angus, I had forgotten about the Camelford water disaster a genuine accident and a mistake ,with 60,000 salmon and trout killed in the sorounding Camel and Allen rivers .
Scale of fish deaths due to mass hysteria ?? sounds rather more than a little big bit "Fishy"
Available to read online
Toxic Turmoil ;Psychological and Societal Consequences of Ecological Disasters By Johan .M Havenaar .Julie G Cwikel Evelyn J Bromet 2002
Page 24 States Re Camelford water ,Two seperate government inquiries failed to confirm a toxic illness . Mass Psychogenic or Sociogenic illness or mass hysteria are terms given to acute outbreaks od so-called chemical illness .
Sounds like a similar excuse for HPV injury and damage of young people?
see also Guardian newspaper report Grenfell Cladding approved by residents swapped for cheaper alluminium cladding . and FBU warns of Grenfell inquiry" stitch up" - FRM Journal . www. frmjournal.com/news . [FBU]Fire Brigade Union.
The cost of "Jobs for the boys " deregulation of standards in basic health and safety risk assessments .From cosy circle of chums ,between industry ,regulators .and quangos -focus groups .directly impacting all of us with sub-standard criteria and guidelines in health and social care as well ,.Resulting in" Dodgy Dealings Disorder "
Good job Darwin noticed "It is not the strongest of the species that survives ,nor the most intellegent that survives . It is the one that is most adaptible to change "
Who is in charge of the organisational asylums, basic health and safety risk assessments for meeting the "Totally bonkers "criteria?


Aimee how would you tackle it at the root? How would you tackle a company or companies; those pharma companies?

We have laws that are not being enforced, so that is out.
We all could get together (it would take the whole world and agree not to buy from them. That is unlikely.


David Weiner


It would be good if the FBI did what you stated, but it is way too busy trying to make a case that those dastardly Russians interfered in our sacred elections.

It was also way too busy to follow up on leads that some imbalanced teen might shoot up a school.

I think this whole "separation of powers" idea is highly overrated. The truth of the matter is that the whole government is basically on the same team, receiving a paycheck from the same source, the hapless taxpayers. And they have all gotten the memo that the government vaccine program is sacrosanct.


Gosh Aimee;
That gets us back to working on the government to kick out lobbying money.
So, intertwined
But what has been exposed here is people in the government. We all know the faces and stories of those working for the CDC and hate them.

Faces of the pharma companies is less apparent.

Which gets us back to the law and justice departments and FBI. It maybe that this is what is so broken and needs to be fixed.

I mean my gosh, Martha Steward got in some kind of trouble with insider trading. It was such an iffy case of she said, he said, they said, little deal; that she did not go to prison for that, but for some little slip of the tongue - a lie, not totally truthful.

Gerberding bat the destroyer; takes a job right out of the gate, and then sells a bunch of stock and nothing.

Thorsen on the most wanted list (I still think some guy in the FBI is saying; well he got greedy and I did not know he was under the protection of the big bosses. I am sorry, sorry, sorry).

Dr. Thompson reports an out right crime. I mean we should not be going to Congress to look at, but the FBI should be coming in to the CDC and leaving with them in handcuffs.

Aimee Doyle

@David and @Benedetta

You're both right - the government should take leadership and the government should police industry. And from a pragmatic perspective, I don't really see how that's going to happen when government agency leaders and Congress are bought out by Pharma. Let's take stock of what's happening at the federal level. Conservatives are currently in power, but I haven't seen any action.

Trump hasn't done anything except appoint pro-vax people to HHS, FDA, and CDC.
The Government Oversight Committee, controlled by Republicans, hasn't held any hearings.
Republican Bill Posey, who holds the whistleblower documents, hasn't done anything with them.
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia closed out legal options for parents of vaccine injured kids in the Bruesewitz v. Wyeth decision. Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote an appellate decision against the family of a child with autism. The IACC does nothing. At the state level, the situation is more complex, but not a lot seems to be happening in red state legislatures against vaccine mandates.

In my experience, my conservative friends are generally more open to the idea of vaccine injury than my liberal friends. I'm certainly not letting Democrats off the hook, but right now (at least at the federal level) they don't have any power.

So you can certainly blame government, but I don't think you can fix any problem until you tackle it at the root. And root is Pharma money.

Angus Files

Susan totally criminal and they are all complacent and complicit in it ..Objectiveness arguments not needed just subjective..and the moon is made of cheese because they say it is;is where I feel we are these days.

Pharma For Prison


susan welch

Angus, Thank you for the link to the DHSC response re aluminium proven to be in brains of deceased people with autism. Very interesting.

I wrote to MPs etc about this research and copied to Dept of Health and Countess of Mar put a written question to Parliament in December (although I've never seen a reply). 2 others had emailed Countess of Mar about this research too. Just from our very small circle they have been made aware of the dangers of aluminium in vaccines (as well as any correspondence they have had from John S.)

As you say, their response is 'Nothing to see here, no more research planned, move on'. As an extremely 'lay' person, I would think that to refuse to look into this new, compelling research would appear to me to be criminal.

Angus Files

The fix is always in when it comes to Autism.My recent Freedom of Information Request .I have more or less given up writing to heads of departments .Firstly I write a FOIR to the Dept that I think should answer.The reply is on the link below no surprise move on nothing to see folks...

Dear Department of Health and Social Care,

To ask whether the DOH have made or are going to make an assessment of the findings of Matthew Mold et al on aluminium in brain tissue in autism, reported in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology; and if so, whether they will encourage further investigation of the link between the incidence of autism spectrum disorder and aluminium.

recent research on aluminium and autism (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar....

Yours faithfully,

Angus Files

To view the response, click on the link below.





I do blame the pharma companies.
I blame the robbers that break into my house too.
However; I expect the police to do something. Look the place over, look at the pawn shops for the articles I listed, look at serial numbers on the tools in these places.

So, I expected government agencies to do some thing to pharma to protect us, not join them.
After that happened, I expected the justice department to watch and do something if the government agencies go criminal too.

Nothing appears to happen here.

David Weiner

@Aimee Doyle

I think it is worth revisiting the article by Dan Olmsted that Age Of Autism recently republished,"Why Progressives Don't Get Autism"

Here is an excerpt from Dan, avowed progressive. The first paragraph is preface and the second paragraph is what I am trying to bring to your attention.

"At THIS moment, what’s required of progressives is a willingness to listen to literally thousands of these parents, and hundreds of scientists and doctors, who are trying to tell the medical industry – trade organizations like the American Academy of Pediatrics, government public health officials at the FDA, the CDC and NIMH, pharmaceutical companies – that something is badly amiss. The message is pretty simple, really: In creating an undeniable public good, those responsible for taking care of children’s health inadvertently unleashed a monster – epidemic levels of developmental and chronic illnesses in this generation of children.

Not surprisingly, they don’t want to hear it. But while all elements of the medical industry – the medical-industrial complex that develops, regulates, administers and protects the recommended national immunization schedule – are equally accountable, the leadership needs to come from the government. It alone is directly responsive to individuals – citizens, voters – and it alone has the authority to make, not just ask for, changes. Government is not here to make a profit but to protect and serve the citizens who elected it. Its shareholders are the people."

Now, frankly, I do not think that it is likely that government will take the lead on this, but I do think that there is at least a possibility that it will be forced to take action if there is enough pressure placed upon it.

Aimee Doyle

@David & Bob

I understand your being frustrated with government and the inaction on vaccines (by Congresspeople on both sides of the aisle). But I don't understand why you don't blame Pharma. Seems to me they should be number one to blame: they make the vaccines, they market the vaccines, they buy the doctors, they buy the legislators, they operate the revolving door for Pharma/agency executives, they buy the media ads and stories, etc.

Pharma should not be let off the hook here. Vaccines start with Pharma.


A decade ago Minnesota Department of Health legal counsel Patti Segal Freeman snidely commented to vaccine safety advocates that public criticism of Thimerosal in vaccines would be followed by attacks on aluminum. She fretted that every ingredient in vaccines would be used frivolously as a slippery-slope excuse to not be vaccinated.

Segal Freeman's job is to protect government officials, not the public -- hence she perpetuates fraudulent CDC consensus "science." In November she reposted GAVI's offensive Tweet describing the cruelly disrespectful "Vaccines Cause Adults" shirt as "BEST. T-SHIRT. EVER!"

https://twitter.com/pattifree @PattiFree

In attempting to fight disease epidemics, Segal Freeman and her MDH coworkers ignore their contributions to epidemic levels of neuroimmune disorders in children and adults. They cannot claim ignorance of CDC data fraud; they have been given honest vaccine research from a variety of ethically uncompromised scientists.

Shame on them.

bob moffit

@ David

With all due respect .. I would list "government" number two ... as the most dangerous ingredient in vaccines ... to me ... the number one most dangerous ingredient in vaccines .. would be the vaccines themselves.

David Weiner

Good to see that scientists are gathering more evidence that aluminum is damaging.

Still, reducing the mercury exposure did not end the vaccine calamity and I doubt that doing likewise for aluminum will either.

The most dangerous ingredient in vaccines is government.


It's uncontainable that the only "torture" Dr Holtrop can conceive of is the pain of the needles. For the judge however this goes way beyond cognitive dissonance. Considering her behavior when Dr Bark was set to testify its quite clear that she is making a concerted effort to keep the science off the record. This should be called out for the serious ethical violation that it is.


What in the heck ! What is she doing living under a pharmaceutical rock!

Ahhh, when was that meeting held on Aluminium anyway?

You all remember it was held down on some tropical island out there some where around Cuba? The meeting that was held by the National Health Administration, and a very famous, French scientist was invited to speak. Dr. Gherardi spoke when, what year?

How long has that been now?

Ah, geesh; You know what, they have always known what aluminium does. While we flander around in the dark of ignorance trying to figure it out. Don't get me wrong; mercury is just WOW. There was a reason Boyd Haley picked it first.
For them it is so much cheaper, less labor intensive because it takes so little of those microbes or the pieces of those microbes once they hook them up to very cheap aluminium salt .

I guess looking at what they did to the troops back during the Kuwait War they had been thinking about changing it for years. So, that is why they shot up all the soldiers with squalene. Two birds with one stone. Liberate Kuiwat and see if a new adjuvant in the vaccines works better and win the war on microbes through vaccines after all.

It is all just good business with them; isn't it?

Angus Files

Its not just the APP the Pharma Fix is in.The Scottish Goverment here in the UK just do not want to know either nano...Show me any studies that prove Aluminium is necessary for health in humans..still waiting for the Chief Science Ofiicer Miller..YAWN!! shame on them all every last single one of the Pharma Shills.

Pharma For Prison


bob moffit

Despite ALL the scientific evidence warning of the "insidiously unsafe, dysfunction and damage to the central nervous system, unexpectedly long-last biopersistence within immune cells, etc" .....

"the best the AAP can do when providing an "expert" witness is to provide the head of the Michigan AAP who thinks ingesting soluble aluminum and injecting aluminum hydroxide are the same thing, despite extensive research showing the dangers of injected aluminum adjuvant."

I believe Dr. Teresa Holtrop of the Michigan AAP-- is knowingly disingenuous comparing "ingested with injected" aluminum ... which makes her far more dangerous than just being "CLUELESS and RECKLESS".

The question will always be ... WHY?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)