World Mercury Project on Mercury Laden Flu Vaccines
Perfectly Understandable

Don't Ask. Don't Tell. Just Make Sure Profits Stay Well.

Heads in the sandBy Anne Dachel

Re: Harvey Weinstein story

According to a number of stories in the news, Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein spent over 3 decades groping and assaulting and paying off women, and no one knew what was going on until the current story by Ronan Farrow came out in the New York Times and New Yorker.

Is that possible?

Not really. We're also hearing that a lot of people knew what was happening and did nothing about it.

There are several stories in the news right now that both raise serious questions about a massive cover-up and point out an eerie parallel with what we’ve seen done for years by the media tells us that the DA in Manhattan had a chance to go after Weinstein two and a half years ago. He didn’t.

(*I couldn’t help but think about how the William Thompson/CDC whistleblower story broke in 2014 and never saw the light of day in the media nor was it addressed by elected officials, even after Representative Bill Posey begged the House of Representatives to call a hearing and investigate the horrifying charges of fraud and cover-up of vaccine injury findings by U.S. health officials.)


 reported on “the news industry’s apparent failure to aggressively report on Weinstein’s decades-long ‘open secret.’”

And even though the New York Times published the recent story about Weinstein’s sexual antics, the Times is also charged with being part of the cover-up because they refused to publish a story about it by reporter Sharon Waxman over a decade ago.

(*Who can forgot how the media refused to report on the shocking revelation in 2011 that the federal government had been for decades paying off claims of vaccine injury resulting in autism, at the same time U.S. health officials adamantly denied any connection between their vaccines and autism.)

UK Debriefed  said that the Weinstein story needs to be “a watershed moment.”

“It takes a lot of people to keep an open secret this big. …No more excuses, no more cover ups, no more second chances, no matter who you are.”

(*Excuse me, but things are never going to change. Does anyone in their right mind honestly think that any network news show financed by the “Ask your doctor if XXX is right for you?” will ever honestly and thoroughly cover the controversy over vaccine damage?

“No matter who you are.”

Seriously? When millions of dollars in ad revenue are at stake, the cover ups will go on forever.)

Hollywood Reporter chastised NBC for not being the first to publish the story about Weinstein, considering that Farrow was one of their contributors while he worked on it. The story alleged threats of lawsuits along with claims of payoffs on the part of Weinstein.

(*I couldn’t help but wonder what kind of influence was exerted back in 2008 when the story of Hannah Poling broke in the press. All the networks covered the news about the young Georgia girl whose vaccine injury case resulting in autism had been conceded by medical experts at HHS.

Hannah’s father, Dr. Jon Poling, was extensively interviewed. It looked like the truth about the link between vaccines and autism had been recognized—but no. The story immediately died in the news and the name Hannah Poling was never mentioned again. It was replaced by a return to the traditional claim of “studies show no link.”)

How could Weinstein have spent thirty years mistreating women while the rest of Hollywood and the media smiled politely? The same way the massive population of brain damaged children is “celebrated” each April and represented by a puzzle piece.

All the self-righteous people harping about Harvey Weinstein will wade away, and I can predict that things will return to the same-old-same-old in Hollywood. We’ve seen this scenario before.

Anne Dachel is Media Editor for Age of Autism.



@ - @Linda1 and Bay,

"I've heard the California fires may possibly have been started by directed energy weapons."

I know it sounds unbelievable, but it is true that the 5G network being installed all over the world in mini cell towers 100-200 meters apart is also an "active denial system" which I believe is a direct energy weapons system.

At this link, see the videos on "active denial system":

@Linda1 and Bay

Bay area mom, that was a fantastic link. The complicitness, corruption all remind me of the pharmaceutical industry which sadly is only increasing in money.
I'm sorry but I have a lot more sympathy for the women that shunned this compromising (pictures they would have known crossed the line) for fame. They made a deal with devil.
I'm sure many people don't know what to believe anymore. It's very obvious we're being lied to about Vegas and I've heard the California fires may possibly have been started by directed energy weapons.



Thanks for posting.
I agree.


For Linda1:

Wow. I literally just finished reading this and have to post this link. This is an excellent article and may help to explain just some of the reasons as to why this story is now open news:!


..."Thus his fortress was quarried from the misshapen material of human vanity, ambition, and greed. Writers and journalists—the intellectuals, in his mind—were nearly as contemptible as actors. They wouldn’t dream of crossing a guy who could turn them into culture heroes with a phone call. Hey, I just optioned your novel and I already know who’s going to make the movie. And oh yeah, please confirm that you don’t, like I think I may have heard, have a reporter looking into a story about me.

A friend reminds me that there was a period when Miramax bought the rights to every big story published in magazines throughout the city. Why mess with Weinstein when that big new female star you’re trying to wrangle for the June cover is headlining a Miramax release? ...

That’s why the story about Harvey Weinstein finally broke now. It’s because the media industry that once protected him has collapsed. The magazines that used to publish the stories Miramax optioned can’t afford to pay for the kind of reporting and storytelling that translates into screenplays. They’re broke because Facebook and Google have swallowed all the digital advertising money that was supposed to save the press as print advertising continued to tank..."


A thought experiment: Would the Weinstein story have been published if Hillary Clinton had won the presidency? No, and not because he is a big Democratic fundraiser. It’s because if the story was published during the course of a Hillary Clinton presidency, it wouldn’t have really been about Harvey Weinstein. Harvey would have been seen as a proxy for the president’s husband and it would have embarrassed the president, the first female president.

Bill Clinton offered get-out-of-jail-free cards to a whole army of sleazeballs, from Jeffrey Epstein to Harvey Weinstein to the foreign donors to the Clinton Global Initiative. The deal was simple: Pay up, genuflect, and get on with your existence. It was like a papacy selling indulgences, at the same time that everyone knew that the cardinals were up to no good. The 2016 election demolished Clinton world once and for all, to be replaced by the cult of Obama, an austere sect designated by their tailored hair shirts with Nehru collars. “That is not who we are as Americans,” they chant, as Harvey Weinstein’s ashes are scattered in the wind..."


Can't help myself - one more...

Just found this and had to comment. Very short 'interview off the cuff' w/Larry King and his wife, Shawn, as they're leaving a restaurant.

Listen very carefully to what Shawn, King's wife, has to say:

Shawn King literally states that this issue with Weinstein was (and I quote), "...very well known..." She then 'quickly' states 'she didn't know...'

Shawn also states that it takes a lot of guts for these young women to go up against someone SO powerful in this industry. She states Weinstein has threatened the careers of many of these girls if they don't cooperate, and/or 'tell.'

...I also just read today that France is considering passing a law in their country which would make it an illegal offense to in any way, shape or form, harass ANYONE in a sexual manner. They are in the process in determining the particulars, but are definitely moving forward in that manner.

I would love to see some sort of legislation of this sort in our own country as well. Perhaps this will be taken into consideration in light of what is transpiring...


..."There's definitely a reason he was offered up now."

Absolutely true.

One lesson I've learned (among many others) is that powerful forces are at play in this lovely universe of ours, and it is not always those forces that are seen with a naked eye.

Whatever is going on with this Weinstein scandal is not yet readily apparent, but time will tell just what the agenda is as this issue with him plays itself out.

@Linda1 and Bay

Weinstein is a sexual predator. They've have all his goings on documented for ages. Why now? I believe distraction from the Vegas debacle we are obviously not hearing the whole truth of and they want to broaden the base of this sex abuse to keep going after Trump. There's definitely a reason he was offered up now.



Okay, I'll bite - but seriously, just this one last time:

Take a read:


..."An investigation by The New York Times found previously undisclosed allegations against Mr. Weinstein stretching over nearly three decades, documented through interviews with current and former employees and film industry workers, as well as legal records, emails and internal documents from the businesses he has run, Miramax and the Weinstein Company.

During that time, after being confronted with allegations including sexual harassment and unwanted physical contact, Mr. Weinstein has reached at least eight settlements with women, according to two company officials speaking on the condition of anonymity. Among the recipients, The Times found, were a young assistant in New York in 1990, an actress in 1997, an assistant in London in 1998, an Italian model in 2015 and Ms. O’Connor shortly after, according to records and those familiar with the agreements.

In a statement to The Times on Thursday afternoon, Mr. Weinstein said: “I appreciate the way I’ve behaved with colleagues in the past has caused a lot of pain, and I sincerely apologize for it. Though I’m trying to do better, I know I have a long way to go.”"

You're on the right track, Linda, in that there is definitely more going on than meets the eye with all of this. You're flat out wrong that these allegations are trumped up (no pun intended). Pay careful attention to the above snipped comment from that article...

Weinstein's own brother has put out several statements regarding the fact that he has tried for years to get his brother to seek outside therapy/help. HW's brother has stated, on the record, that he, too, has been bullied and emotionally battered by his own brother. (My husband just pointed out to me that there are statements floating around that Harvey's brother has also been accused of poor behavior with women, but I know nothing about that issue...)

Hollywood, from what I learned after having worked on the periphery of that industry, is a very close knit community. In other words, there are community secrets that are known to just about everyone involved in the industry; OPEN secrets known to everyone, including the issues not just with Harvey Weinstein, but with others as well.

Sexual harassment is as old as the hills; this type of harassment reaches into every industry and outgrowth in our society, but the issue with Hollywood is that it is simply more PERVASIVE in this industry than in perhaps any other. This most likely is but one reason it is ACCEPTED as such within the industry and those of whom have been subjected to this type of harassment are essentially told to keep quiet, get used to it, it's just the way that it is. Words to that effect...

But again, it is interesting that although these allegations against Weinstein are absolutely nothing new, it does give one pause as to why NOW these allegations are oozing out of the woodwork after all these years. I'm glad to see this happening, but my sense is that there is a sort of cosmic universal karmic reaction to it all (w/o sounding too awfully conspiracy theorist about it all).

Perhaps unseen forces are behind this. I wouldn't doubt it.

And please don't forget, Linda, that Fake News, such as it is, does not necessarily mean that every single soundbite coming from our MSM is fake news. When there is an agenda at hand, as there most definitely is with this entire Weinstein scandal, then the powers that be have NO COMPUNCTIONS whatsoever in releasing the truth WHEN IT SERVES THEIR PURPOSE/AGENDA.

There's definitely an agenda going on here, but that agenda does not mean that these allegations against Weinstein are false. Timing is everything. There's a reason these allegations are now being PERMITTED into the public domain, when before, the allegations were being covered up by those higher ups within the industry.

It will be interesting to see how this all plays out...


I don't really want to go on about this either, but thanks for your thoughts. I had to listen to the wire tapped conversation a couple of times, because he kept saying that he swore he wouldn't do anything to her and he offered her water, which isn't exactly an admission of intention to commit a crime. But, it seems he wanted her to accompany him to the bathroom...

Anyway, I still think there's more to this. I could be wrong, but the detailed accounts from all these people, even the wiretap, seems to be over the top for news reporting. Wouldn't they save the bulk of this for a criminal investigation? Or is he being tried in the court of public opinion? Because if there is going to be a trial, don't they usually keep these things and testimonies as evidence? Something seems very off.

Enjoyed this quote from the wiretap article:

"Multiple sources said that Weinstein frequently bragged about planting items in media outlets about those who spoke against him; these sources feared that they might be similarly targeted. Several pointed to Gutierrez’s case, in 2015: after she went to the police, negative items discussing her sexual history and impugning her credibility began rapidly appearing in New York gossip pages."




Audio tape of HW and actress:

I'm finished speaking about this HW issue. Am just glad that this is all coming out in the open now. This is a very sad situation for all parties concerned. Hopefully, this sort of behavior will no longer be tolerated by any one person, but that's probably not going to happen. It's a damned shame what some people will do to become famous and what those who DO become powerful and famous, will do, to stay there.



Just to clarify, we DO have television(s) in our home and on the rare occasion, I will watch it, i.e., weather disasters, or any other major newsworthy event). I have viewed a few programs about the Weinstein issue and that's when I viewed several in this industry acknowledging that this issue with Weinstein has been known for decades.


You can find the audio tape of this young girl online. It leaves absolutely no doubt how predatory this man is.

Again, Weinstein has openly acknowledged that he needs help. I would imagine his statements along this route are not borne out of some heartfelt apologies toward his victims, but rather because he knows that the women he has done these things to over the many years will be coming out and there's no escaping it on his part.

He's finished in this industry, at least for now. It will be interesting to see what else comes out from all of this.



"Really? Where'd you learn about it? From the same bought media that we know has a decades long history of reliably biased selective reporting? It is unbelievable that everyone here who knows how the media works in every other case is eating every crumb of this story up without question and is willing to join the whipped up angry mob..."

First, I would have thought you would have known me better than this by now, given my plethora of comments over the past years. Seriously.

Secondly, the fact that you do not have a television speaks volumes (and not that there's anything wrong w/this...I don't want television myself).

Where to begin:

Linda, Weinstein's proclivities have been a vastly open secret for decades. If you had a television and had viewed just a small portion of the news coming out about all of this, you would have heard MAJOR insiders in the industry, i.e., lawyers, film makers, actors, etc., so forth, admitting that this issue with Weinstein is yesterday's news.

It's just that all of this is coming out NOW, for some very odd reason. And that's what I've pounced on with my own observations with all of this. The fact that this issue, an issue of which I, myself, have known about for years now, find so very interesting.

Additionally, I do have a few friends and a couple of relatives in this business. I also worked with a major entertainment law firm in Westwood, CA for years (where I met my now attorney husband) and believe me, you hear and become aware of things in this business, in this fashion as well. Things you would not normally be privy to, in the public sector.

Also, there is a TAPE of a young up and coming actress (cannot recall her name off hand), which involved her complaint with Weinstein from years ago. The NYPD put a mic on this girl and she willingly placed herself back within Weinstein's clutches, with tape/mic running. The DA on that case, however, amazingly decided there was nothing he could really use off that tape within which to file charges against Weinstein, but it is BLATANTLY obvious that Weinstein's behavior with this young actress was perverse and of a sexual nature. In fact, Weinstein admits on this tape that he had groped this young girl's breast.

I LISTENED to this tape. It's been all over the news, Linda. Weinstein was definitely trying to get this girl to come into his hotel room and she refused...repeatedly. He was practically begging her to; Weinstein claimed that SHE was embarrassing HIM; he told her he was a very famous guy and didn't want people to hear her speaking to him in the hallway, etc.

Years ago, Seth MacFarlane made a comment about Weinstein's exploits during the Oscars. He explains why he did so, here:


"In 2011, my friend and colleague Jessica Barth, with whom I worked on the Ted films, confided in me regarding her encounter with Harvey Weinstein and his attempted advances," MacFarlane posted. "She has since courageously come forward to speak out..."

So Linda1 - NO ONE is making ANY allegation against Weinstein that isn't truthful. He is NOT being persecuted, nor set up, in any way whatsoever.

Further, Weinstein has admitted that he needs help and has not refuted any of the claims thus far, that have now surfaced.

Indeed, this type of behavior on Weinstein's part, is just the tip of the iceberg in Hollywood. It is a known fact that the industry is rife with this type of blatant behavior and has been accepted by those within the industry, as such. Celebs are tripping over themselves, trying to convey the "I just didn't know this was going on," in order to save face, and NOT because they didn't know.


Women have, rather unfortunately, played a part with all of this as well. I am NOT blaming any of the women who have had to suffer emotionally after having been through something like this, but on the other hand, there ARE women who would willingly offer themselves up to the likes of Weinstein in order to further their own careers.

I have known for years now, about Weinstein. Years. In fact, when all of this finally came out about him, I asked my husband how was it that if I'd known about all of this for years, major celebs are coming out and stating they didn't know. That was a rhetorical question, obviously. I knew that many of these big name celebs would try to cover their own asses by declaring, "Oh my. I just didn't know."

That's utter BS. And they know it. And they're not fooling ANYONE with that nonsense.

Also, if you've ever read any of the older celebs' biographies (which I have), many of them allude to this issue, i.e., the rapes of some major Hollywood actresses, and children born out of these horrific circumstances (and adopted out in some cases).

This is not just a Hollywood issue. This type of behavior I, myself, have been subjected to, and is an issue for not just women, but for men as well. Men, too, have been subjected to this type of perverted behavior...

...and it needs TO STOP.

I hope you'll forgive my rather passionate comment about this issue, but other than the vaccine issue, this issue is a huge one for me, given what happened to me years ago. And it's not just one instance or one event which happened to me.

This is a sick society we live in. This issue NEEDS to be addressed. Weinstein belongs in PRISON. I do believe in forgiveness, but in Weinstein's case, his redemption will take a very long time (if ever).


"There's absolutely NO spin to the allegations in this story. The stories about Weinstein's blatant behavior have been known for decades, "

Really? Where'd you learn about it? From the same bought media that we know has a decades long history of reliably biased selective reporting? It is unbelievable that everyone here who knows how the media works in every other case is eating every crumb of this story up without question and is willing to join the whipped up angry mob.

I don't have TV, so maybe that's why I am not getting swept up in the powerful waves being rolled out to catch people's minds. It is a scary thing to witness.

Aimee Doyle

@go Trump

"no concern by the finest medical system in the world"

And apparently no concern either from our President or Congress about the ever-rising rates of autism and other neurological disabilities.


Ronan Farrow has an adopted sibling who was crippled by polio. Therefore understandably that eyewitness experience is enough for him: he gets virulent towards people he has been told are against all vaccines.

Interesting how his experience of living with a disabled sibling, make him less tolerant to hearing stories from the parents of vaccine-disabled children.

Also interesting how someone with such passion for the polio vaccine, and with such obvious connections to India... isn't aware that reports in 2012 showed that in India, vaccine-induced cases of polio paralysis outnumbered wild-type cases by a factor of 3-4

If he's really so passionate about eradicating polio, shouldn't he be angry at the medical establishment, who keep propagating the myth of vaccine-preventable diseases? Which in the end, only serves to ensure that effective treatments for polio are never developed?

Grace Green

Cia, "the police decided to do nothing about it"? I have a theory that the reason why it appears to be only rich men who abuse is because the police accept large bribes to cover it up. If you think about it, even an innocent man would rather lose a bit of money than go through months or years of trying to prove his innocence. I believe that in the UK the whole criminal "justice" system is getting rich on creating culprits.

go Trump

Harvey W. obviously has a number of faults. But, like nearly everything in America, the money and power is always far, far more important than the truth.

There has now been nearly 140 vaccine-SIDS deaths since the Las Vegas event. About 2,000 new Autism cases and 10,000 children have started on ADHD meds.

No concern by the finest medical system in the world, which is what they say about themselves...

Carolyn mcD

Whoa that just happened I wrote a long commen about Ronan farrow and it seemed to disappear . Argh

Carolyn mcD

Editor: when I use my iPhone and press preview it always times out on me after editing so please excuse my typos and Kim if you want me to write this up or anyone else wants to write it up into a longer article go for it or let me know.

Carolyn mcD

Ronan Farrow has an adopted sibling who was crippled by polio. Therefore understandably that eyewitness experience is enough for him: he gets virulent towards people he has been told are against all vaccines. Ronan Farrow has a sister who says she was molested by Woody Allan. Therefore, understandably, Ronan has rejected Allan and written about this with great anger. Ronan Farriw is a journalist. And yet, despite these stories, he will not listen to our community's eyewitness account: of what happened to our babies and children. He is blind to the obvious: people with a story to tell are the best way to find the truth. And . The powers that be do everything they can to protect that power and lie, distort, attack victims, attack truthtellers. He courageously addressed this about hos own possible father . And his life with his sister makes him feel strongly about vaccines. But Ronan Farrow this one isn't black and white. Vaccines may protect against some diseases. But you need only talk to some parents, read package inserts, scour pubmed . To learn that our stores and pain from avoidable vaccine injury are as true as your pain from avoidable illness. And an intelligent look at the truth would save so many infants and babies, including babies from third world countries who are often used as guinea pigs in vaccine safety trials. And babies from families who genetically cannot process adjuvants and microbes in vaccines. Just as you Ronan will always shudder when you see your ex-father chummy up to a very young girl, and just as you will get angry when stars who say he never hurt their children attack your mother as a liar, you attack us when you don't even bother to meet us and hear our stories and let us point you to the science not done from profit motive. We shudder every time a friend tells us she is about to get a round of 6 shots for her infant or an unnecessary hep b shot for her newborn or a Gardisil shot. We shudder too. We could be friends here Ronan if you would only open your eyes and ears and hear us.

Carolyn mcD

Ironic fact:
One reason that creeps justify alllowing continuing harm from shots is their fear that admitting any harm will cause no one to get shots

I fear that if we loudly make people realize that viciousvaxxers went after Harvey we will scare away others from helping get this out--and that's exactly what they want just as trashing Wakefield terrified researchers into silence. We need to find out if Harvey has a child on the spectrum.


I agree that, "The intriguing question is - what is behind this sudden war on Weinstein? As Anne points out, it is not that Hollywood has all of a sudden had a come to Jesus moment. There's something else going on here."

And I agree that DeNiro and Weistein planning a movie about vaccines could be the reason why his protection evaporated.

Not at all condoning Weinstein's behavior nor disbelieving the women. Seems like he's getting his long overdue just desserts.

Most likely we will never know, but it may be that people with skeletons in their closets risk being "Weinsteined" if they threaten the vaccine program.

@Jeanette Bishop

I think you are on the money about all the blackmail. Add in the Las Vegas tragedy that they are obviously lying about, pedophilia...and yes, the vaccine program is one of their most heavily guarded and protected institutions.


..."We don't know where the line is between the truth and the spin in this story."

There's absolutely NO spin to the allegations in this story. The stories about Weinstein's blatant behavior have been known for decades, but such is the culture of this industry (and others as well). This sort of behavior, though, is just more perverse and 'accepted' if you will, in THIS industry.

It is interesting, though, that after all these decades of this 'open' secret, that this all comes out NOW. Why? Why now?

Perhaps unseen forces at work are behind this...who knows. And this is just the tip of the iceberg. The whole pedophilia issue, sex trafficking issue, is also an underlying layer to all of this.

This is a sick and perverse industry all the way around. I'm heartened to see this elephant in the room being exposed, but have doubts that it will cause too much change in the industry overall.

Hopefully, I'll be proven wrong, but won't hold my breath...


What did Rachel Maddow and the New York Times report on Andy Wakefield?

Did we believe them? No. Because we knew the truth. But lots of people did believe the spin. They were very convincing weren't they?

We don't know where the line is between the truth and the spin in this story.

cia parker

Everyone in those circles knew what Weinstein was doing. I didn't know anything about him until the other day, and then I read a lot of articles about him, including one about what Anne mentions, the New York Times had a detailed, well-written story about his abuse of MANY women ready to go, but when Weinstein complained about it, they decided not to publish it. Rachel Maddow said last week that everyone dropped the ball until finally the MEDIA came to the rescue, the New York Times getting the ball rolling with another story about him which it published this time. One girl was abused, went to the police, who sent her back wired, and she got oral statements from him confirming the abuse, but the police decided to do nothing about it.

I saw a clip from an Academy Awards presentation in which the presenter mentions that now maybe these women will be safe from Weinstein, and everyone laughed. So as long as he was playing with major figures in the Democratic Party, and doling out largesse to them with open hands, everyone loved him and overlooked his (criminal) weaknesses. Only now, when he had stopped playing ball with them, did they turn on him, and his erstwhile friends, among them Meryl Streep and Hillary Clinton, are going on and one about how SHOCKED they are at the revelations of his crimes. I read he was planning to abscond to Europe, following in the footsteps of his pedophile friend Roman Polanski.

Shelley Tzorfas

This is a compelling analogy. The difference is that when movie stars were trying to get ahead-sex became a weapon of choice to have them move "Two steps forward or two steps back." As Anne and all the regulars of AoA know, Millions of children and their families have lost their lives to vaccine paralysis and injuries; SIDS-Sudden Infant Death Syndrome ( until age 1) SUDS-Sudden Unexplained Death Syndrome-after age 1 and the Newer Kid on the Block SADS-Sudden Adult Death Syndrome which appears when college kids have to get rounds of vaccines for Universities and other programs. Things like E-Coli Bacteria lurk in some Meningitis shots where you could die if you eat it, but it is fine to be shot with as is done on college campuses. When you factor in all the family members, siblings, grandparents and more, it is a provocative number. The divorce rate is sky high after vaccine injuries and now once again, the courts are demoralizing women and children. They are putting moms who will not inject their children with E-Coli Bacteria, Aluminum, Mercury/thimerosal, Aborted human Fetal Cell DNA, cells of animals with Leukemia, are having custody removed (all or in part) and being thrown in jail like common criminals -who make movies.

Jeannette Bishop

My impression is the whole culture is so unspeakably corrupt that 1) I'm expecting just about anyone "rising" to a position of influence to have something on record that could be used as blackmail against them, maybe sometimes obtained by the vilest means of entrapment, maybe often because these individuals fall down pretty much on their own volition. 2) The system/culture probably does allow and protect crimes, "improprieties" (perks?!?) as long as the perpetrators are going along with the program (a program that includes an entire oligarchy getting rich off of sickening people, in the name of protecting people, via vaccination, which increasingly appears to me to be one of its most protected tools). If a significant number have their own "blackmail file" out there in the hands of someone(s) or other(s) they're not going to be the first casting stones at the very least. 3) The system has no qualms (and this seems to be another of its most prized tools) using charged, divisive subjects/accusations to distract and prosecute in the court of public opinion, never mind due process in a court of law, someone they are unhappy with, maybe often as means to remind everyone under their thumb not to stray and maybe to keep the rest of us from paying attention elsewhere, 4) and the system is also willing to and has completely made stuff up and/or grotesquely distorted events as we've seen (how can we know anything is true when a corpoate media outlet is talking about it?), with all of the corporate media sometimes parroting outright verifiable lies when it wants to distract and shut someone or something important down.

Something like Vaxxed of all things (the CDC whistleblower?)?--it backfired to tell people not to see it--and maybe another documentary out now that might get more curious about Vaxxed--a documentary reviewers are now telling us allows us to "keep our established views." So why go see it, even? Is that the hoped for effect? Many reviewers at least don't want to attack this filmmaker personally or the film itself. What if a third documentary on this topic with higher profile names is in the works or even just hinted as a possibility? How many others trying to make a living at least partially under the wand of hollywood might be thinking they want to be getting off the sidelines, if not off the poisoners team, on this topic?

Any way, it's hard (for me obviously) not to be suspicious that some the most vilest of agendas drive and underlie the use of vaccination, watching all this, wondering if it's related, and it's also hard not to hate myself for any support I've paid into to this system and its "culture..." thank you, Age of Autism and Anne for makinga place that has courageously and unglamorously put out the truth on this topic, as far as can be determined.


Not discrediting the women, but many of them are repeating what they heard. As for the accusers, what ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
This guy has been convicted by the media. That's not right either.


Remember after DeNiro spoke out, it was going around that he was under intense pressure because of it. But we didn't know more than that. He also said that he doesn't want to talk, because then "things happen". What things? We assumed he was talking about the folks who attacked the Vaxxed Tribeca screening, but we don't know if that was all that he meant. He could have received other threats that no one else knew about.

Not only is such a scenario possible, it's probable.

John Stone


It is possible - I don't know but if they were menacing him personally at Tribeca - rather than just withdrawing support the possibility of making a film would not have been an obvious answer.

Another thing, without the DeNiro/Weinstein film we still know what these people have done - you couldn't say there is nothing more to be revealed - but essentially we still know without them.

Managing Editor Kim

As a woman martial artist who teaches self defense - I'd like to make sure I voice my thought. It may be the ALLEGATIONS were covered up for decades - and then exposed when the powers that be decided it was TIME to bring down Weinstein, perhaps because of the vaccine movie. But Weinstein himself loaded the gun and handed it to them by his behavior. Like Bill Cosby - I believe the cover ups happen as part of the boys club - profit club - fraternity mindset - that doesn't for a minute mean I will discredit the WOMEN.



Also to add to my last comment to John,

DeNiro said he wasn't going to talk about the vaccine autism film that he was working on with Weinstein, so it is entirely possible that it moved forward and that the CDC et al were keeping close tabs on the project.



Why do you think DeNiro may have been "jelly-like"?
Maybe he knew who and what he was dealing with and he didn't want to be "Weinsteined"?
Or worse?

John Stone


It is obviously one question that has been hovering in the columns but in my opinion evidence that DeNiro and Weinstein were exactly driving ahead with the project is lacking - and as we have seen DeNiro's performance at Tribeca was jelly-like to say the least, so I am not sure how worried anyone would have been about this. It is true that Ronan Farrow who was instrumental in this episode had a disgraceful hand in the Thompson cover-up but I would be inclined to believe that all this is just indicative of the dodginess of the mainstream media.


Is there any possibility that he is being discredited because he was suppose be making a documentary with Robert De Niro on Vaccines The media tried to destroy the credibility of Vaxxed by claiming the director was a fraud and lost his medical licence. In Harvey's case he had to be disgraced for other reasons before his doco could see the light of day. Since he was not a doctor, what better way to do it than brand him a sexual deviant. This story also suggest the possible vaccine link

Angus Files

They are burning him to protect who or deflect the light away from another.There will be more to follow.

Pharma for Prison



Yesterday I saw an article about a "former Playboy bunny" (not Jenny) who claims that Oliver Stone "groped" her breast years ago.

Now. Oliver Stone. What kind of thorn in whose side has Oliver Stone been? Lots of people. And yesterday People Magazine and other outlets reported how Stone was "defending" Weinstein. Stone is quoted as saying:

“I’ve heard horror stories on everyone in the business,” Stone adds. “So I’m not going to comment on gossip. I’ll wait and see, which is the right thing to do.”

Stone wasn't playing follow the leader and we can't have that. So he was reminded that he too, is a mere mortal and was given a taste of his own demise. Immediately, this was pulled out of someone's back pocket and published:

And then Stone reportedly took his assigned place in the choir.

Sharyl Atkisson lays out how it works:

The reporting is all agenda driven and controlled. We know why the vaccine autism connection has been suppressed.

The intriguing question is - what is behind this sudden war on Weinstein? As Anne points out, it is not that Hollywood has all of a sudden had a come to Jesus moment. There's something else going on here.

bob moffit

Anne asks:

"How could Weinstein have spent thirty years mistreating women while the rest of Hollywood and the media smiled politely? The same way the massive population of brain damaged children is “celebrated” each April and represented by a puzzle piece."


Again .. redundant I know .. but .. none-the-less applicable today as when Malcom X first said:

"The greatest power of the press .. is their power to IGNORE.

Prime examples being ... the life-long sexual predator Wienstein in Hollywood .. and .. the whistleblower Dr Thompson in Congress.

Unfortunately .. the media could not IGNORE anything .. without the complicit help of people in both .. Hollywood or Congress. Shame on all of them.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)