Posted by: Ken | March 03, 2017 at 10:56 AM

I agree Ken there is no assault here but Josh is doing exactly what we should all be doing .
Challenging all our political representatives on camera about the William Thompson revelations . Josh is certainly not displaying me in any bad light .
Josh I salute your valiant efforts .Wish there were more like you .

The BBC has yet to print the name William Thompson , from Aug 2014 to Mar 2017 , the lying thieves at the BBC just pretend the story never happened . This is the way the military misinformation censorship machine works over here . Total news blackout .
The BBC has ceased to some extent its pro vaccine stance , the safe and effective mantra has stopped . They are sitting and waiting to see what will happen next .
The vaccination program has taken a battering in recent times . Those that have followed closely can now be in absolute no doubt the entire vaccination program is a complete fraud .It is the greatest crime against humanity in the history of all crimes .
I believe I have a reasonably good handle on it but I am convinced there is much more to uncover yet . Vaccination is the holocaust that supercedes all others .

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0EsCJZbZKU

I have never had this happen in my life , Can we call the Police !

A UK version of another criminal on the run .

I hate religion - for that very reason I say A frickin men Right side of History!!!!!!

Thank you so much for Your comment!!

From what I understand Josh has an eye witness, and from what was recorded it does seem that Pan confirms the fact that he has a hold of Josh's arm. Assault? Not really, there clearly is no intent to do further harm. Did Josh identify himself as a member of the press? Not sure, but I don't think so. These are two things that don't bode well for any kind of legal argument, however, in the world of political, celebrity, journalism laying a finger on someone with a camera in your face is FOREBODEN! It's the fact that the Pharma front-men are so sure of themselves, are so arrogant that they can't even prevent themselves from managing time-honored traditions of the free-press, largely in-part because the "free" press has not done its job on the issue of vaccine-induced autism. If they would have we would have far-fewer injured people in our world.

I do agree though that I think Josh has played this card enough. He's flagged, and Pharma's next move will be to portray him as some sort James O'Keefe and he should dial it back. Any other citizen journalist out there who wants to stick a camera (or phone) is the face of a bought and paid for by big pharma journalist on the issue of William Thompson, Poul Thorsen, or Merck lawsuit should go for it.
Heck we should stick a phone in the face of the journalists who claim to stand for civil rights, and ask them why the didn't report that the NOI was outside the CDC last October. Ask any journalist who claims she stands for women's rights why they're not reporting the pleas of so many American mothers. Get your phones our people, I think Josh is on to something?

According to Josh's report, and verified with that jurisdiction's police, the building's cameras taped Pan grabbing him. Josh reports that Pan squeezed his arm. That can be legally be considered assault. Pan shouldn't have touched him.

Hi all,
Just another opinion.Pan is an elected official; holding him accountable for his decisions, which have long term effects on his constituents, asking him polite but hard questions on camera as often as necessary; I highly support that.If nothing else it reminds others who may have wanted to go the Pan route, that their constituents will remember, that this won't go away, and that choices to disregard the wishes of some of their constituents have consequences.

However, it always good to play fair when you can, regardless of whether the other side does or not. In this case, based on the video, it didn't imo (absent other information) look as if any kind of assault happened.
Had Josh been knocked to the floor in a violent flurry of camera images, the situation would have been different. I do applaud Josh's polite and non violent approach; it does make it more obvious that he is an innocent party in whatever occurs.
I would guess that if Josh continues to ask hard but polite questions on camera, eventually someone may hit him; if that does happen ( and Josh is evidently a brave man) that is the time to push for legal recourse;this is just my opinion, but this event didn't seem to be what could fairly be considered assault, regardless of the letter of the law.

I despise Senator Pan and the sinister groups behind the scene that prop him up and use him to further their agenda. And he is such a coward for consistently refusing to meet with his constituents. That being said, as much as I appreciate his advocacy, Josh needs to step back for a bit and stop doing these gotcha interviews. He's making vaccine safety advocates look bad. And as much as I am against everything Pan stands for, clearly there was no assault that took place here. Take a minute Josh and refocus.

Several friends not involved in the "vaccine safety issue" commented on my facebook and said they saw no assault. Josh did he turn around and push or punch or what?

I point out my friends that Pan is a nut, and looks like one when he starts looking for a door, any door will do!

When he should and could at least give some politically boring statement that hypnotizes, and puts us all to sleep, and then; only after then, says he has an important meeting somewhere. With that he walks like a statesman with purpose. Yeah, he walks down the hall with purpose like he was really going some where and not just trying to escape.