Medical Board Water Boards Vax Injured Child
NOTE: You might think that headline is all wet. But think about it as you read this intense post by Ginger Taylor. She decided to take her pediatrician to the medical board for failure to evaluate him for vaccine injury. She lost. Chandler lost. We lost. Again and again we're subjected to a Niagara Falls of denial, lies, cover up, push back and refusals by the medical community tasked with OUR VERY CHILDREN'S FATES. We're drowning in vaccine injury. Water boarded. There is NO Geneva Convention for us. For our kids. Take the poison. Drink from the "be a good Mommy
bottle" without any idea what's inside or what will happen. Shut up. Roll up your kids' sleeves. Choke.
###
I Brought My Doctor Before the State Medical Board For Failure to Investigate a Vaccine Injury
Ginger Taylor, MS
Two weeks ago, in my letter to the Johns Hopkins Journal, Narratives in Bioethics, I made public the fact that I had taken Chandler's pediatrician before the state medical board for failing to evaluate him for a vaccine injury. It was a journey that started two years ago, and I am just now wrapping up.
Here is both the short version of the story, and the very long version for the true die hards.
This is the question I before the Maine Board of Licensure in Medicine:
What is the duty of a physician to his patient when a parent reports a suspected vaccine injury?
Their answer...
The doctor has no duty to the patient.
Well that is their implied answer. What they really did was just make up an excuse to close the complaint and not answer the question at all. But in their refusal to answer the complaint that a physician had failed in their duty to investigate a vaccine injury claim, they establish the standard of care.
The standard of care for reported vaccine injury is... medical negligence. (also blame the mother, but that is just SOP with autism moms now isn't it.)
Thus again proving my assertion, Mainstream Medicine does not take vaccine safety seriously.
That is the short story. Here is the long version.
I have to report that I was ACTUALLY waterboarded by a dentist pouring water down my throat and refusing to stop. As someone with ME I have difficulty swallowing, all of which she had been informed of beforehand. I informed the IAOMT, of which she was a member, but they just filed the information! Such is the determination of the UK dental profession, both NHS and private, to cover up the harm done by dental mercury amalgam. I'm afraid this battle is really dirty.
Posted by: Grace Green | February 15, 2017 at 08:59 AM
Errata (correction to my prior comment):
My prior comment stated "over 5,000 American babies/children are being damaged each, and EVERY week."
"EVERY week" is wrong, it should read "EVERY day." No excuse for not double-checking, I'm sorry.
Posted by: david m burd | February 14, 2017 at 08:43 AM
Hi Michael,
I meant solely what the doctor would say to inform the patient. I believe it is the doctor's responsibility to do the informing and that patients should not have to read any books or do any investigating on their own in order to be safe in a doctor's office. I know that isn't the real world, but that is the way it is supposed to be, and that is fundamentally what is wrong with this picture.
Posted by: Linda1 | February 13, 2017 at 02:38 PM
Linda 1 "but I wonder what informed consent would look like at this point in time." Short answer to have been reading AoA from the beginning or any of books mentioned @ AoA. Informed Consent for vaccinations takes discipline and a lot of reading. Then you would have Informed non-consent to the CDC's approach to vaccinations.
Posted by: michael | February 13, 2017 at 01:47 PM
At what point does the autism epidemic and its ensuing bufoonery start to get embarrassing for the American pediatric profession?!
*********
When the The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 gets repealed.
And people start referring to this unspeakable atrocity, for what it really is.
Posted by: Barry | February 13, 2017 at 06:16 AM
At what point does the autism epidemic and its ensuing bufoonery start to get embarrassing for the American pediatric profession?!
Thank you SO much Ginger Taylor for all you do! You are one of the most amazing people in the world!
Posted by: annie | February 12, 2017 at 12:36 PM
Paul Thomas, thanks for continuing to contribute here.
Many make a powerful point (that I agree with) there are presently scores of thousands (even millions by this date) of parents with their young infants and children who have declined all vaccinations, and a diligent effort to survey them would yield easily tens of thousands of participants.
Of course, the late Dr. Mayer Eisenstein's Homefirst Practice in the Chicago region still has four (or five) partners carrying on in his wake (no pun intended), and their records comprise tens of thousands of unvaccinated children, ready to be matched to a vaccinated-matched cohort. Also, it's highly likely an additional scores of thousands of like parents around the U.S. could be found to participate IF there was any genuine effort to do so by our Health Leaders. However, it'a a Big IF because these same Health Leaders endorse the rigid vaccine dogma, as you have well stated. and are fighting every day.
Terribly*, over 5,000 American babies/children are being damaged each, and EVERY week. This estimate accrues from 50% of America's children now being listed - even by the CDC - as having serious chronic health disabilities, including serious mental and learning disabilities (from the basis of a consistent, about 4 million babies born each year).
Parenthetically, I would also contend each year at least 3,500 babies die directly from SUID/SIDS purely due to vaccines' toxicities at 2, 4, and 6 months whence they have received a total of 25 injected vaccine doses by the 6 month mark (I am including the first dose of flu vaccine, and count the DTaP shots as 3 doses, all having vast array of excipients, none intended by Nature to be injected in infants). On top of the known toxicities, every shot has to some extent unknown, some inevitably disabling or deadly, contaminants well documented by such as Janine Roberts' book Fear of the Invisible, and other emerging studies.
*Actually, it is beyond "terrible" - we are literally on the road to absolute destruction of our society if this carnage is not quickly abated and/or slowed down rapidly.
(please pardon if this is a duplicate post)
Posted by: david m burd | February 12, 2017 at 04:55 AM
Posted by: david m burd | February 12, 2017 at 05:02 AM
Paul Thomas, thanks for continuing to contribute here.
Many make a powerful point (that I agree with) there are presently scores of thousands (even millions by this date) of parents with their young infants and children who have declined all vaccinations, and a diligent effort to survey them would yield easily tens of thousands of participants.
Of course, the late Dr. Mayer Eisenstein's Homefirst Practice in the Chicago region still has four (or five) partners carrying on in his wake (no pun intended), and their records comprise tens of thousands of unvaccinated children, ready to be matched to a vaccinated-matched cohort. Also, it's highly likely an additional scores of thousands of like parents around the U.S. could be found to participate IF there was any genuine effort to do so by our Health Leaders. However, it'a a Big IF because these same Health Leaders endorse the rigid vaccine dogma, as you have well stated. and are fighting every day.
Terribly*, over 5,000 American babies/children are being damaged each, and EVERY week. This estimate accrues from 50% of America's children now being listed - even by the CDC - as having serious chronic health disabilities, including serious mental and learning disabilities (from the basis of a consistent, about 4 million babies born each year).
Parenthetically, I would also contend each year at least 3,500 babies die directly from SUID/SIDS purely due to vaccines' toxicities at 2, 4, and 6 months whence they have received a total of 25 injected vaccine doses by the 6 month mark (I am including the first dose of flu vaccine, and count the DTaP shots as 3 doses, all having vast array of excipients, none intended by Nature to be injected in infants). On top of the known toxicities, every shot has to some extent unknown, some inevitably disabling or deadly, contaminants well documented by such as Janine Roberts' book Fear of the Invisible, and other emerging studies.
*Actually, it is beyond "terrible" - we are literally on the road to absolute destruction of our society if this carnage is not quickly abated and/or slowed down rapidly.
Posted by: david m burd | February 12, 2017 at 04:55 AM
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17654772
Posted by: g | February 11, 2017 at 07:42 PM
I once upon a time wrote to the Kentucky State medical board and explained how my son had reacted twice and then the third time - the ped was busy trying to reach for the door knob as I said WAIT! He is running high temperatures.
Except that was hardly the issue that I was writing to complain about and I continued to tell them that my son was having seizures and that my son was getting proper treatment or even the proper concern.
It did not a bit of good. I moved out of state a few years later. I swear that though my husband had a great job to move too; the deciding factor for me to move was get the heck out of the area and get some help with the seizures.
IT took an additional two years once we did move, to get help with the seizures and on seizure medicine. Unbelievable.
.
I
Posted by: Benedetta | February 11, 2017 at 02:21 PM
However, just as any physician will provide care and evaluation for an injury like a broken arm they should provide care and evaluation for a vaccine type injury regardless if the physician considers it to be vaccine related.
**************
I think the issue in this case is that vaccines related, also means physician related.
And there's no way to admit one, without admitting the other.
Posted by: Barry | February 11, 2017 at 02:09 PM
Vaccine injury? what vaccine injury? My vaxxed v un vaxxed petition request for a study at the Scottish Government - The naturally obtuse reply- no need for one what's this guy talking about?
The Official Report (a substantially verbatim transcript) of the meeting has been
published, and a recording of the Committee’s consideration of your petition is
available at the following link:
http://www.scottishparliament.tv/20170202_public_pets?in=00:06:04&out=00:09:32
MMR RIP
Posted by: Angus Files | February 11, 2017 at 01:30 PM
Need to find 350 pediatrcians, nurses, doctors, autism groups etc that are willing to sign a letter to President trump to battle the one sent by all of those groups, and sign it and publish it as best you can calling on a vaccine investigation, and link all of the studies that show Brian injury and autism in vaccines.
Posted by: George stevens | February 11, 2017 at 01:26 PM
Maiming babies should be illegal in America.
********
It is .
That's why they call it autism instead .
Posted by: Barry | February 11, 2017 at 12:48 PM
You're right, the pediatricians do miss the chronic injury or just ignore it.
I noticed my son's loss of eye contact immediately, went in for a check up, and was summarily dismissed. As things got much worse I actually filed with vaccine court and was again dismissed.
Maiming babies should be illegal in America.
Posted by: kws | February 11, 2017 at 12:02 PM
Ginger, I suspect that part of the problem is that the members of the State Medical Board likely view yours as a complaint that your pediatrician failed to investigate a problem that, due to articles like this, they believe doesn't really exist:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03781.x/full
Posted by: ndavis | February 11, 2017 at 11:24 AM
@ Paul Thomas
"We must insist on the long term studies that compare unvaccinated to vaccinated populations and look at all health conditions. Only then will we start to unravel the full extent of vaccine injury. In the mean time, informed consent must be mandatory, and as such any vaccine mandates should be illegal."
I wholeheartedly agree on the URGENT need to conduct "long term studies that compare unvaccinated to vaccinated populations" .. and .. that "informed consent must be mandatory".
Having said that .. I would suggest we also need to conduct serious re-evaluation of well-established policies that allow pediatricians to routinely ignore or otherwise avoid reporting "adverse events" following vaccinations ..
and
we also need to conduct serious re-evaluation of the policies and processes that provide complete "product liability protection" .. especially the denial of parents to seek justified compensation in STATE AND FEDERAL courts .. rather than limiting parents to the Vaccine Court .. where parent's and their attorney's are DENIED THE DISCOVERY PROCESS .. as their ONLY avenue to seek JUSTICE for their injured children.
Ginger Taylor .. a mom of a vaccine injured child .. and .. yourself .. a practicing pediatrician .. have made an exceptionally strong case to support President Trump's rumored creation of a commission on vaccine safety and scientific integrity ...where the problems you both have encountered and acknowledged ... can FINALLY BE RESOLVED TO MAKE OUR CHILDREN'S LIVES "SAFE" ONCE AGAIN.
Posted by: Bob Moffit | February 11, 2017 at 10:13 AM
"Only then will we start to unravel the full extent of vaccine injury. In the mean time, informed consent must be mandatory, and as such any vaccine mandates should be illegal."
Dr. Thomas,
Not trying to be snarky, but would informed consent include that the medical establishment has no idea of, and in some cases does know but does not publicly acknowledge the extent of the short or long term harm that this series of treatments does? Would informed consent include telling each patient the list of contaminants that have been found in all human vaccines? Would informed consent include telling the patient about the government's conflict of interest in holding patents for and profiting from the sale of certain vaccines and about how governments across the world have completely different schedules correlated to 1/3 and 1/2 the infant mortality that we have?
I respect you and I am not challenging you, but I wonder what informed consent would look like at this point in time.
Posted by: Linda1 | February 11, 2017 at 10:13 AM
The physician’s response to the complaint includes: “If it is Ms. Taylor's intent to file a claim with the U.S. Court of Federal Claims for a vaccine injury, it is not my role as a physician to be her representative by [but] simply to provide appropriate care and evaluation for her child, which is what I believe I have been doing.”
This response appears to be written to provide protection from legal action under Maine law where the questions for professional negligence are; (1) was a there a deviation from the standard of care, and (2) did that deviation result in an injury? See http://legislature.maine.gov/legis/statutes/24/title24sec2502.htm .
However, just as any physician will provide care and evaluation for an injury like a broken arm they should provide care and evaluation for a vaccine type injury regardless if the physician considers it to be vaccine related. Chandler should clearly present as a child in need of treatment. See https://www.mainemed.com/sites/default/files/content/PGML_2015Updated.pdf p. 140, and also see definitions at http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/34-B/title34-Bsec6201.html .
Posted by: Jim Thompson | February 11, 2017 at 10:11 AM
Wow, Ginger! I thought that pediatricians had, at least, the duty to point parents to VAERS, if you can call that "standard of care." Sigh....
Thank you for sharing both the summary and long versions of your nightmare—one we all share. After all these years of being summarily dismissed/poo-pooed regarding my family's experience with vaccine-induced encephalopathy, and as hard as these stories are to bear to read, it makes me feel like I'm not crazy because I know EXACTLY what you're describing.
I guess if we just keep telling our stories, at some point, there will be enough groundswell to make meaningful change. So, thank you for taking the time to share it with me and others.
Posted by: Sally Rubin | February 11, 2017 at 09:56 AM
The problem I see with our current system of vaccine injury compensation is that it misses most (I would guess 99%) of the chronic injury that develops over time. As a pediatrician, I have never been trained nor read in the journals that pediatricians read, how to recognize the conditoins that are listed as vaccine injury for purposes of the Childhood Immunization Act.
When we repeatedly inject vaccines with known neuron-toxins (example aluminum) an autoimmune phenomenon can occur that plays out over months or years. A cummulative toxic affect can also progress as we continue to inject more and more toxins, adding them to a young body that is already bombarded with the toxins known and unknown in our environment. The current system doesn't recognize any of these chronic conditions as vaccine induced or vaccine injury.
We must insist on the long term studies that compare unvaccinated to vaccinated populations and look at all health conditions. Only then will we start to unravel the full extent of vaccine injury. In the mean time, informed consent must be mandatory, and as such any vaccine mandates should be illegal.
Posted by: Paul Thomas | February 11, 2017 at 09:45 AM