WalletHub Asks "Should Vaccines Be Mandatory?"
CDC Blocks Testimony of Vaccine Whistleblower says World Mercury Project

The Hill Reports CDC Under Influence of Corporate and Political Interests

Abuse of pwerBy Anne Dachel

There was a stunning story published on October 17, 2016 in The Hill entitled,"The CDC is being being influenced by corporate and political interests," by Carey Gilam.

Concerns about the inner workings of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have been mounting in recent months amid disclosures of cozy corporate alliances. Now a group of more than a dozen senior scientists have reportedly lodged an ethics complaint alleging the federal agency is being influenced by corporate and political interests in ways that shortchange taxpayers.

A group calling itself CDC Scientists Preserving Integrity, Diligence and Ethics in Research, or (CDC SPIDER), put a list of complaints in writing in a letter to CDC Chief of Staff and provided a copy of the letter to the public watchdog organization U.S. Right to Know (USRTK). The members of the group have elected to file the complaint anonymously for fear of retribution.

 “It appears that our mission is being influenced and shaped by outside parties and rogue interests… and Congressional intent for our agency is being circumvented by some of our leaders. What concerns us most, is that it is becoming the norm and not the rare exception,” the letter states. “These questionable and unethical practices threaten to undermine our credibility and reputation as a trusted leader in public health.”…

And the complaint cites as “troubling” the ties between soft drink giant Coca-Cola Co., an advocacy group backed by Coca-Cola, and two high-ranking CDC officials - Dr. Barbara Bowman who directed the CDC’s Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention until retiring in June, and Dr. Michael Pratt, senior Advisor for Global Health in the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP) at the CDC.

Bowman, retired after revelations of what the complaint called an “irregular” relationship with Coca-Cola and the nonprofit corporate interest group set up by Coca-Cola called the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI). Email communications obtained through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests by USRTK revealed that in her CDC role, Bowman had been communicating regularly with - and offering guidance to - a leading Coca-Cola advocate seeking to influence world health authorities on sugar and beverage policy matters.

Carey Gillam is a veteran journalist, formerly with Reuters, who directs research for U.S. Right to Know, a nonprofit consumer education group focused on food safety and policy matters.

First of all, it’s refreshing that a “veteran journalist, formerly with Reuters” can write like this. When was the last time any experienced reporter openly criticized the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention? And if Gilam is troubled by the scientific fraud going on with women’s health and with obesity research, imagine how she’d react to stories on corrupt immunizations practices. Someone needs to talk to her about the one study done on thimerosal in 1930 where all the subjects died from meningitis, and tell her about Thomas Verstraeten, Simpsonwood, Poul Thorson, Julie Gerberding and Merck, Hannah Poling, conflict of interest waivers at the CDC, and most recently, William Thompson.

It is encouraging to learn about the existence of the anonymous group of senior scientists in  CDC SPIDER who are working to expose corruption at their agency. (And if corporate influence has the CDC giving soft drinks a free pass, imagine the power and influence of the vaccine makers have when it some to vaccine safety.)

Robert Kennedy Jr and the CDC (Covering up the corruption)

On April 6, 2015 vaccine safety advocate Robert Kennedy, Jr. spoke at the New Jersey state capital in Trenton in opposition to legislation that would remove a parent’s right to exempt their children from required vaccinations. The room was filled with reporters and he focused on the corruption, collusion and malfeasance at the CDC that had been exposed during congressional hearings.

It was a scathing report about the ethics of the agency in charge of vaccine safety. 

The second half of his 45 minute talk was a chance for reporters to question Kennedy about his claims. Incredibly, during the question and answer session not a single reporter asked about the serious charges Kennedy had made about top U.S. health officials.  Most of them only asked about exemptions and need for herd immunity. It was like they weren't even in the room when Kennedy spoke. When members of the press so willingly close their eyes to charges of fraud and the damage done to a generation of children, they become part of the corruption.  

Kennedy: "The trillion dollar pharmaceutical industry is now the largest advertiser on television, radio and newspaper pages, spending from $3 billion to $5.4 billion annually over  the past decade. Pharmaceutical companies target network news divisions for their advertising buys partially for message control and partially for the demographic; TV news audiences tend to be older affluent pharmaceutical customers .A network news division president told me two weeks ago he would fire a newscaster or program host whose reporting or programming choice lost his station an advertising pharmaceutical company.

"Of course, it's easy for bean counting network executives to sell this censorship to reporters and on-air employees by parroting  the industry/government mantra that allowing debate on vaccine safety will inflame the 'anti-vac' movement and kill babies these factors account ,to some extent ,for the impenetrable Kafkaesque suppression. Journalists are reporting what the government tells them to think instead of doing basic reportorial investigation. The gatekeepers enforce this orthodoxy by avoiding science and facts and instead focus on vilifying and crucifying the heretics.

"In 2005, Dan Shulman wrote a scathing and somewhat bewildered critique of the airtight censorship among media organs of any debate over vaccine safety or CDC corruption. He said that many reporters considered covering this issue to be a potentially 'career ending' hazard. Today that censorship extends not just to the mainstream media but also to the so-called "alternate media" like Salon, Slate, Huff Post and Mother Jones. There is simply no national forum for this debate. We have been forced from the public square."

This is what Carey Gilam is up against.

There is a clear double standard shown by members of media when reporting on vaccine safety issues vs other controversies. A shocking example can be seen in the writing of New York Times reporter Anahad O’Connor. I took a look into the amazing differences in his coverage. 

On Sept 28, 2015, the Times published O'Connor's story, "Coke Spends Lavishly on Pediatricians and Dieticians."  Like a true investigative reporter, O’Connor revealed just what influence corporations can have over what doctors tell the American public. Like Gilman, he wrote about Coca-Cola, but his focus was the American Academy of Pediatrics and Coca-Cola. 

            But when O’Connor covered the safety of vaccines, he didn't bring up anything about competing science, industry influence or conflicted research. On March 4, 2004, in the New York Times piece, "Researchers Retract a Study Linking Autism To Vaccination,"   O’Connor reported on the move by the Lancet to retract Andrew Wakefield’s 1998 article on the link between the MMR vaccine, bowel disease and autism. In his story, O’Connor gave readers no substantial information about Wakefield’s research, nor did he mention the fact that Wakefield’s field is gastroenterology. 

In Feb 2005, O’Connor and Gardiner Harris wrote a piece for the New York Times called, “Health Agency Splits Program Amid Vaccination Dispute.”

“Responding to growing concerns about its ability to monitor the side effects of vaccines, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention decided last week to separate its national immunization program, which advocates vaccination, from its vaccine safety branch, which monitors the potential risks of the vaccines.” 

The story explained that critics were saying the CDC was more concerned with promoting their vaccines than making sure they were safe. CDC head Julie Gerberding was quoted saying, ‘We believe the best practice for the safety monitoring program is to keep it in a separate locus from the large-scale program.” While U.S. Rep Dave Weldon, a physician, praised the change as ‘a step in the right direction,’ Dr. Paul Offit expressed his criticism of the move and the charges that the agency had problems. ‘That's not true. They care as much about vaccines being safe as they care about them working. They wouldn't recommend them unless they felt the benefits clearly outweighed the risks.’

Much of the safety concerns that the CDC was involved in had to deal with the use of the mercury-based preservative, thimerosal.  O’Connor and Harris ended the piece with the reminder that the use of mercury in vaccines was nothing to worry about.  “Numerous epidemiological studies conducted in Europe have also shown no link between autism and vaccines containing thimerosal.” When it was a question of vaccine safety, O’Connor was more than willing to take the word of the CDC and look no further.

On June 25, 2005, in another New York Times story with Gardiner Harris entitled, "On Autism's Cause, It's Parents vs. Research,"  the public was told that all the science was in and the question has been answered: “The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Food and Drug Administration, the Institute of Medicine, the World Health Organization and the American Academy of Pediatrics have all largely dismissed the notion that thimerosal causes or contributes to autism. Five major studies have found no link.”

Is vaccine safety so sacrosanct that the media simply won’t go there? How is it possible that the CDC-Coca-Cola connection can make the news, but the revolving door between the vaccine makers and those who oversee them is never looked at? If health officials can be bought off by a soft drink maker, imagine what pharma can offer when it comes to vaccine approval.

I hope the CDC SPIDER scientists have the courage to back Dr. Thompson and denounce what their agency has done with vaccine research too. What could be more worthy of exposure than what an unchecked, unsafe vaccine schedule has done to a generation of children?

Anne Dachel is Media Editor for Age of Autism.



There was a great Trump moment in a recent speech where he said if president he would push ethics reform in the government. He would essentially abolish the revolving door by making it illegal for lobbyist to work in Congressional offices, or for any member of a bureaucracy or an elected official to move from public service into private industry for a certain number of years...like 10.. Can you imagine laws that relate to the pharmaceutical industry that aren't written by staffers who are also marketers for the same industry. Imagine CDC scientists who could not by law base their careers on using public service as a stepping stone into the big pharma like Julie Gerberding.

I just heard a snippet of this speech but I couldn't believe my ears. Of course the crowd went absolutely crazy with cheers as if all of us have been holding our breaths. What a relief that would be. Imagine an ethics reform that made collusion between industry and the safety agencies that are suppose to protect the public illegal. We are not being protected, not in the banking industry, not in the health industry. Even if Trump is not elected (and it isn't looking that hopeful), he brought up the topic and before we descend into a darkness with no light at the end of the tunnel, will someone else please follow through.


"How is it possible that the CDC-Coca-Cola connection can make the news, but the revolving door between the vaccine makers and those who oversee them is never looked at?"

Because it is probably a sacrificial lamb. It's probably been approved for discussion in order to detract from what else is going on at the CDC, which is much more serious and will have much wider implications. Nobody is trying to remove US citizens' right to drink coco-cola, and their sales have dropped enough and coco cola can point to their shift to flavored waters, etc, as evidence they are not the wolves they are made out to be.

Simultaneously, it makes it appear to the general public as if these "watchdog writers" and by extension the main stream media, would be writing about vaccine damage if it really WAS a serious problem, exactly because journalists are revealing the corporate influence of high rollers like coco cola on a different issue. Yet notice how they all deliberately stop short of asking the question "what else is the CDC hiding" in its other departments, as if they've taken things as far as needed, no need to look any further. Fortunately, any clever reader will be asking that question in their own minds. After all, how many times do drunk drivers get a pass until the judge and jury can't ignore the history any more?


Bob Moffit-I agree with your post 100%!! You have put into eloquent words the exact situation we are all facing in the United States today. I think Ben Franklin is watching us and saying what has happened to the country that I and the founding fathers worked so hard to create? We live in perilous times to be sure.

Laura Hayes

Video of Yates Hazlehurst to go with what Hans Litten posted:


Hans Litten

Have you all seen this most important article :




The thimerosal issue has been spun to tease out the supposed differences between ethyl and methy mercury, with some internet trolls event suggesting that there never was mercury in vaccine because, you know, they say so.

Interesting to note that the vaccine experts at Merck were the first to flag the potential hazards of mercury containing vaccines way back in 1991, as revealed by the internal memo by Hilleman (Offit's posterior occupied, and maybe still does, the Hilleman Chair at CHOP)-

"A memo from Merck & Co. shows that, nearly a decade before the first public disclosure, senior executives were concerned that infants were getting an elevated dose of mercury in vaccinations containing a widely used sterilizing agent.

The March 1991 memo, obtained by The Times, said that 6-month-old children who received their shots on schedule would get a mercury dose up to 87 times higher than guidelines for the maximum daily consumption of mercury from fish.

"When viewed in this way, the mercury load appears rather large," said the memo from Dr. Maurice R. Hilleman, an internationally renowned vaccinologist. It was written to the president of Merck's vaccine division.

The memo was prepared at a time when U.S. health authorities were aggressively expanding their immunization schedule by adding five new shots for children in their first six months. Many of these shots, as well as some previously included on the vaccine schedule, contained thimerosal, an antibacterial compound that is nearly 50% ethyl mercury, a neurotoxin."


Bob Moffit

The sorry state of the mass media in the US is extremely troubling .. and .. a dangerous threat .. to the future of our country .. as Ben Franklin warned would only remain a .. "Republic if you (the people) can keep it".

It is my own personal opinion .. but .. its not just the media .. it saddens me greatly to admit .. during my lifetime .. 1939 thru today .. every institution .. science, political, military, finance, religion, academia, public health, justice, on and on .. as I cannot think of ONE institution that has survived .. ethically and morally .. our two hundred years of "self-government" .. still deserving of my complete .. unquestioning .. faith and trust.

Louis Conte

CDC is a captive agency.

They will protect their silent partners, the pharmaceutical industry, to the end.

It's good that some employees are getting angry and some media is willing to report.

Cracks in the dam beginning to appear...

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)