Just Breathe
Dachel Wake Up: Texas Monthly Goes After DA Nico LaHood

Vaccines: Elimination Mandatory!

AofA Op EdNOTE: We encourage you to share your thoughts on Laura's point of view in the comments and to write your own opinion piece and submit it to us for review.  Do you think no one should ever be allowed to vaccinate, or that everyone should always vaccinate, or do you fall somewhere in between?  Send to Olmsted.Dan@gmail.com.  

By Laura Hayes

Why are vaccines a legally permitted medical option? They shouldn’t be.

In a country whose citizens pay trillions of dollars annually to fund government regulatory agencies charged with protecting the public and policing multiple industries, including the pharmaceutical industry, vaccines should be long gone. It is past time to mandate their demise.

Vaccines are medical procedures that never should have been approved. Here’s why:

  • Not one vaccine has ever been tested according to the scientific gold standard, that of a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Yes, you read that correctly, not one.

  • The myriad combinations in which vaccines are administered have never been tested, either. For an infant at a “catch up” appointment, meaning they missed a “well-baby” appointment at which vaccines would have been administered, that can mean receiving up to 13 vaccines containing 13 different diseases, at once, injected via 8 separate needles. That is the equivalent of taking up to 13 medications at once whose interactions have never been studied. To make matters even more serious, the number 13 does not include the many other ingredients that accompany and worsen the effects of being injected with 13 diseases, such as mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, anti-freeze, phenol, MSG, polysorbate 80, Triton X-100 detergent, food proteins, animal viruses and retroviruses, fetal tissue from aborted human babies, and more. The number 13 also does not include ingredients that are not required to be listed on the label, but which are permitted under the cover of “trade secrets”. Undisclosed ingredients being injected into our children? Unacceptable, unethical, and terribly dangerous. Ask yourself, would you want your baby contracting multiple illnesses, up to 13, at once? Would you want your baby contracting multiple illnesses at once while also being poisoned at the same time? If you are following the CDC’s recommended schedule, you are allowing that.

  • Many vaccines contain mercury in the form of thimerosal. Thimerosal was patented in 1928, and has been used ever since, despite it being tested on humans only once, in 1929…a test in which all 22 subjects died within 2 days of receiving thimerosal. Mercury is a known toxin and neurotoxin, with no safe amount for a human. It can kill when applied externally. With vaccines, it is injected internally. Claims that mercury has been removed from vaccines given to children are false.
  • Many vaccines contain ingredients that have never been clinically approved by the FDA. Defying common sense and violating basic safety and ethics standards, the FDA approves vaccines that contain never-proven-safe and known-to-be-dangerous ingredients. For example, there are two forms of aluminum adjuvants used in vaccines, aluminum hydroxyphosphate salt and aluminum oxyhydroxide salt. Neither has been clinically approved by the FDA, both are known toxins and neurotoxins, yet both are in vaccines approved by the FDA. These are but two examples, there are more.

  • Aluminum is an undisputed toxin and neurotoxin. Its toxicity has been known for some 90 years. The two aluminum adjuvants mentioned above are used in vaccines for the express purpose of inducing toxicity. Permitting the use of aluminum in vaccines is akin to permitting lead paint in government approved toys and teething rings.

  • Aluminum adjuvants (not clinically approved and used to induce toxicity), vaccines (improperly approved and containing unapproved ingredients, including those used to induce toxicity, and containing ingredients known to be toxic and neurotoxic), or a combination thereof are used as the controls in vaccine safety trials. A control is supposed to be a placebo, an inert substance which doesn’t cause harm or therapeutic effect. Neither an aluminum adjuvant nor a vaccine qualifies as a placebo, therefore, no valid safety claims can be made for any vaccine.

  • Vaccine making pharmaceutical companies are permitted by the FDA to do their own safety testing, with no oversight and no verification from a financially independent entity. As mentioned in the point above, they do not use placebos for controls. Nevertheless, when they say that the trial vaccine proved to be no more dangerous or deadly than the aluminum adjuvant or other vaccine against which it was tested, they declare it safe. Is that how you want medical procedures for your children being declared safe? The FDA and CDC accept this current method of testing. They also accept that vaccines are not tested for carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, or impairment of fertility.

  • And the real kicker…there has never been a comparison study of the unvaccinated versus the vaccinated. That is because the vaccine profiteers know that the health, development, fertility, and longevity of the completely unvaccinated are far superior to that of the vaccinated. As a result of that knowledge, they have managed to keep that study from being done for more than seven decades. Without such a comparison study, absolutely no safety, efficacy, or necessity claims can be made.

Let all that sink in for a minute if you will.  Read through that list one more time so you can fully digest and comprehend that our nation’s vaccine program is built on a deceptive and fraudulent house of cards that has nothing to do with scientifically valid truths or the health and well being of our children. 

Yet, these medical procedures, not properly tested, improperly declared safe, known to contain toxic and neurotoxic ingredients, and barbaric as they are, have not only been approved, they have been mandated. That is corruption and insanity at its worst. It is evil, and it is destroying the majority of our citizenry.

For those people who say they just want “choice”…for those people who think it’s okay to have to formally exempt out of vaccination versus simply saying, “No thank you”, and who are willing to beg, plead, and pay in an attempt to avoid or refuse vaccination via exemption…for those people who just want “greener” vaccines, as though it’s ever a healthful or wise idea to purposefully invade, tamper with, and taint our God-given immune systems…for those who just want the mercury removed, as though it is the only problematic ingredient…for those who say we just need genetic pre-screening beforehand, as though any human is designed to have their inner systems and brain assaulted in such a way by so many toxic, neurotoxic, and foreign substances…and for those people who say we just need more “informed consent”, which is not even possible given the unscientific vaccine studies rife with fraud and deception…I contend that those stances are not sufficient or ethical.

In the past, I have called for an immediate ban on vaccine mandates in all 50 states. In reality, however, even that is not acceptable or enough, given the facts of the situation and the complete and utter failure of our government regulatory agencies.

Since our government regulators have failed to require or ensure vaccine safety, it must be assumed, and can be shown, that not one single vaccine is safe or advisable. Therefore:

What is required is an immediate moratorium on all vaccinations, for all people. 

That is what should have happened in 1986, versus Congress passing an Act indemnifying all who make and administer vaccines, at a point in time when vaccines were maiming and killing thousands.

Not demanding an immediate moratorium on vaccinations is no different than accepting any of the following:

  • We know that a particular brand of car has a history of blowing up, harming and killing people, but government regulators say it can stay on the market…and our Congress will indemnify the makers and sellers of that car so victims cannot sue.

  • We know that a particular brand of crib is causing thousands of babies to become trapped between the bars, leading to serious injuries and death, but government regulators say it can stay on the market…and our Congress will indemnify the makers and sellers of that crib so parents cannot sue.

  • We know that a particular brand of canola oil is making people violently ill, causing permanent brain damage, causing immune and nervous system damage, causing severe GI issues, and in some cases killing people, but government regulators say it can stay on the market…and our Congress will indemnify the makers and sellers of that canola oil so that those who consume it cannot sue.

  • We know that a particular medication has a history of inducing heart attacks, strokes, and aneurysms, resulting in disability, mental incapacitation, paralysis, and death, but government regulators say it can stay on the the market…and our Congress will indemnify those who make and administer that medication so that its recipients cannot sue.

Do you see a pattern of absurdity here? Well, that same pattern applies to vaccines.  Government regulators, who regulate many industries including the pharmaceutical industry, should not permit the continued use of vaccine products which they openly admit cause brain damage, immune system damage, nervous system damage, seizures, anaphylaxis, blood disorders, gastrointestinal system damage, paralysis, and death…to name but a few of the health disasters and fatalities that are known and admitted. Yet, these products are approved, recommended, and increasingly mandated for…newborns, within hours of taking their first breath, including those born prematurely…infants…toddlers…young children…teenagers…college students…daycare workers…parent volunteers…hospital workers and those whose business takes them into hospitals…the elderly…everyone…including recommendations for pregnant women. No one now escapes the recommendation of, and for many, the mandate of, these dangerous, potentially-fatal medical procedures.

We need public outrage and criminal proceedings for incompetent, negligent, and corrupt government regulators, and for pharmaceutical company executives who are destroying the health and well being of our children as they rake in billions from their toxic, destructive, and deadly vaccine products. We need steadfast refusal to vaccinate, boycotting of those who administer vaccines, which is in complete and inexcusable violation of their oath to "First, do no harm", and rebellion against vaccine mandates and those who legislate, require, and enforce them.

Are people so “busy” and otherwise preoccupied that the poisoning of all humanity via vaccination is something they are willing to turn a blind eye to, and will mindlessly agree to accept? 

Are our government regulators all so corrupt or cowardly that they are not going to put a stop to that which is causing epidemic after epidemic in our country? And I am not talking about measles, mumps, or chicken pox. I am talking about encephalopathy (i.e. permanent brain damage, the actual and accurate name for vaccine-induced “Autism”), Type 1 diabetes, seizure disorders, asthma, paralysis, SIDS, speech and language delays, OCD, Tourette’s syndrome, attention and behavior issues, life-threatening peanut allergies, food allergies galore, and children who can’t talk, an ever-increasing and tragic phenomenon which originated in the late 1980s in lockstep with the tripling of the vaccine schedule. There is no end to the list of vaccine-induced horrors now plaguing our children and grandchildren, and people of all ages.

Are school board members and school district personnel, including school nurses, who are well aware of the increasing numbers of chronically ill and developmentally delayed students, not to mention the challenges and costs of educating them, going to continue to remain silent? Silence in the face of such obvious student decline is unacceptable and hard to explain. They must acknowledge and publicize this change in the student population in the past 25 years, demand that legislators act on parent reports of vaccine-induced health and development problems, and vaccine-induced death, and refuse to enforce dangerous and tyrannical vaccine mandates.

Are legislators going to continue to set aside upright morals, ethical behavior, and the preservation of liberty as they put their campaign coffers and pharma perks above the health of those they represent and above the well-being and sustainability of our country?

The solution is simple:

To stop the Vaccine Holocaust, we need to stop vaccinating. 

That means an immediate moratorium on all vaccinations for all people. 

Vaccines can no longer be a choice on the menu of medical procedures.  Humanity already faces an extreme uphill battle to try to recover from the horrendous damage done by them to date.

Written by Laura Hayes, mother of vaccine-injured children, including one severely and permanently disabled by vaccine-induced encephalopathy.  She prays this vaccine madness will end on a dime, today…which is not a moment too soon.

Comments

Bob Moffit

@ Ronald .. again ... am I understanding your position correctly .. ultimately .. you are "reluctant" to accept Laura's "moratorium on vaccines because ......

"Today's political and social environment is not conducive to the banning of vaccines, harmful drugs, wireless radiation, glyphosate, fossil fuels, et al."

I would respectfully ask .. do you have ANY logical reason .. to believe our political and social environments will EVER be "conducive to a moratorium on vaccines"?

Indeed .. in addition to the already numerous vaccines in various stages of development .. such as .. Zika ... our political and social environments are only going to get much WORSE after 2020 .. if the National Adult Immunization Plan succeeds in requiring ADULTS be vaccinated as recommended and approved.

In my humble opinion .. Laura is RIGHT .. the TIME is NOW .. POSTPONING A MORATORIUM FOR WHATEVER REASON .. WOULD ONLY FURTHER SERVE TO PROTECT THE "POLITICAL AND SOCIAL ENVIRONMENTS" THAT HAVE PERPETRATED THIS ONGOING HOLOCAUST.

In the know

People who have questions concerning GM (Genetically Modified Foods), and how they increase and exacerbate the toxic burden on our children by the insane vaccine schedule, may want to watch this video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a52vAx9HaCI

AUTISM EXPLAINED: Synergistic Poisoning from Aluminum and Glyphosate. Dr. Stephanie Seneff, Senior Research Scientist at MIT, explains the synergistic role of aluminum and glyphosate in autism. Glyphosate is the active ingredient in Monsanto's herbicidal Roundup. She also discusses glyphosate's role in diabetes, Alzheimer's, digestive system disorders, infertility and birth defects.

Cynthia Cournoyer

Ronald,
Surely breathing toxins in the way we do now cannot compare to injecting the ingredients into a body.

Your control group already exists. People live in the same environment. Breathing the same toxins. Some are vaccinated, some are not. Unvaccinated children are less susceptible to chronic illness.

I agree, we live in a dangerous world and there are many hazards. Because we can't ameliorate all hazards does not diminish the need to eliminate one hazard to infants, whether it is by choice (eliminate mandates) or by moratorium. The end is the same. Healthier children in the unvaxxed population.

rtp

the fact is that there is no such thing as contagious disease.

If there was, doctors would have the lifespan of a fruitfly.

Vaccines are a completely ridiculous and dangerous answer to a question that only a complete lunatic would think to ask in the first place.

Disease can appear to "spread" because it has a common cause. That common cause is either poisoning or trauma (usually the latter). But germs have nothing to do with it and if disease were communicable then nobody in their right mind would ever go to a hospital or doctor's office for anything.

Of course, most people in their right minds would avoid them as much as possible at any rate - but if disease was truly communicable, you wouldn't be able to enter them without keeling over.

Linda1

"I think it's an exaggeration to say that half of all children will be autistic in ten or twenty years."

That's according to the current trajectory. There is no reason to think it will not continue as it has, especially with the CDC adding more vaccines.

rtp

rates of disability have increased tenfold since the widespread use of vaccination.

And life expectancy trends were rising faster before their wide use too.

They don't save lives, they don't reduce our chances of being disabled (quite the opposite).

They are an abject failure.

How anybody here can even think to give them the slightest credit for anything is beyond me.

Let me repeat.

Rates of paralysis have increased since the polio vaccine.

What more do you need to be told before you realise that there isn't a single aspect of the mainstream medical paradigm that isn't a lie?

Danchi

Ronald Kostoff
Your statement about the safety of vaccines not having been demonstrated applies equally well to hundreds (if not thousands) of other substances in the market-place, including wireless radiation, glyphosate, atrazine, myriad drugs, biosludge, fluoridation, astroturf, etc.

The difference is people have a choice and the government and a rabid band of lunatics are trying to remove that choice. This smacks of Nazi Germany, Korea and China to some degree. If there is a risk there must be a choice and parents are the sole advocate for their children and it is their right to make medical decisions based on their own conscious. Considering there is not one Independent study that confirms that ANY Vaccine be it Smallpox, Polio, Measles, Pertussis, Varicella etc is effective and safe so why take the risk. There are no studies that confirm that Vaccines were solely responsible for disease reduction in any part of the world at any point in history. In fact, if you read the data from that is available on line via the CDC National health statics you'll see that all of the childhood illnesses were vastly on the decline BEFORE a vaccine was ever developed. In many instances such as with Smallpox & Polio-the vaccines increased the number of cases. Jonas Salk even recognized this finally. There are many diseases that just naturally abated on their own without a vaccine, Scarlet Fever comes to mind, also the Plague. Nature would have found it's way.

IMHO vaccines have kept these childhood illness in play but in a distorted form. Rather than developing natural immunity you have vaccine induced pseudo-immunity which allows what the CDC likes to call Breakthrough Disease which is a fancy smancy way of saying the child has been infected by the vaccine and vaccine doesn't work. Happens often and the CDC uses the breakthrough disease and the vaccine viral shedding from VACCINATED children to blame outbreaks on the UNVACCINATED. Because they control the media this information never get to the mainstream but surfaces on facebook or those site labled as anit-vaxx. Here's an example of what I'm talking about:
Kath Burke: http://whale.to/vaccines/varicella4.html.
This article went viral on MSM website and facebook. The article is of her son illness with Chicken Pox which she exacerbated by giving him a European version of ibuprofen. She says her Peds said it was fine. Typical of a MD who hasn't read any of the research available. Baby had a horrible reaction and what does she and the media do---BLAME ANTI-VAXXERS. She posted plenty of revealing information on facebook but she didn't realize what she stepped into because "Anti-Vaxxers" ask lots of questions. This child was a victim of vaccine shedding which the chicken pox vaccine is know for. But in the case of the media dishonesty prevails.

I applaud Laura's call to end Vaccinations all together. I have not read one single study that confirms that Vaccines are a benefit in any way. For Gods sake look at the ingredients! Would you put the ingredients of the MMR in your morning orange juice? Read this article which I found to personify the majority of those who vigorously support vaccines:
People just don't always think for themselves. I decided to approach this from a different angle. I decided to being attention to vaccine ingredients without mentioning vaccines to see if anyone would notice the deadly cocktail without all the brainwashing that apparently escorts the word "vaccine". Secretly, yes, I was hoping that some pro-vaccine person in my friends list would bite. And she did. Here is the thread that led to her threat to call Child Protective Services on me:....
This Woman Threatened To Call CPS On Me!
http://www.alabasterliving.com/blog/this-woman-threatened-to-call-cps-on-me.

If Unvaccinated children are a threat to Vaccinated children please explain scientifically how?
If vaccine work as the myth continues to be perpetuated, than what's the buzz against those who chose not to offer their children up on the altar of the pharmaceutical industry? I just read an article that stated that 1 child in 4 is chronically ill. In 2011 it was child in 6. Clearly the medical community is doing something wrong.


susan

Thank you, Laura. I totally agree with you and thank you, also, for keeping up the fight for vaccine injured children and their families.

The continued propaganda that is pushed out by the media is nothing short of criminal.

Tribulusterrestris

I think we should all have the choice to use whatever medication we want. Thalidomide has such a calming effect on the pregnant mom. She sleeps better and doesn't have that aggravating anxiety that might also disturb the developing child in the womb. The drug companies have a right to make a profit. Leave them alone. Not EVERY child born to a Thalidomide mom has missing limbs or hands that protrude from shoulders. They can live a joyful life. Challenges like having no legs build character. Moms should have the right to chose to take Thalidomide or not. Put it back on the market!
As with vaccines, every child does not show overt disability. Never mind that the diseases of yesteryear were nearly eradicated by sanitation, hygiene, and nutrition and elimination of ddt, etc, BEFORE the vaccines hit the scene. What if, just maybe they did work? We should have them on the market just in case. Think of all the pediatricians that would be out of work, out there with a tin cup begging. Have a heart!

 ciaparker

I think it's an exaggeration to say that half of all children will be autistic in ten or twenty years. If the triggers for autism (vaccines and number of doses, and vaccine uptake) don't increase, I don't think the rate of autism will either. When I have gone to my daughter's schools, or scout meetings when she was a girl scout, it was depressing in a way to be surrounded by so many typical kids. Going to her high school, hundreds and hundreds of them in the halls. Autism is brain damage: vaccines can cause it through encephalitis, but I don't think things like GM foods do. We're talking stroke-like brain damage to cause autism.

Cynthia Cournoyer

Ciaparker,
"We see better health in unvaxxed children now because there are no very dangerous epidemic diseases in the US." Nonsense.

I am referring to the better health of unvaccinated children having to do with less autism, asthma, allergies, ADHD, and many other chronic illnesses. I am not referring to their lack of diseases for which we vaccinate. Fear of disease seems to be limited to only those which we vaccinate for, every time we have this discussion.

The desire to believe that vaccination equals lack of disease is very short sighted. Whether or not vaccines have or will deter communicable diseases is not the debate at hand. Whether or not vaccinating causes chronic illness, damage or death is the real issue. Protecting one child against the negative outcomes of vaccines is the road to better health in children over all.

If you believe diseases would come back and wipe out the population simply by not vaccinating, you are promoting fears that are not only unfounded, but fall on the deaf ears of those who witnessed the decline and maybe death of their very own child. That one child's death could have been prevented today, not in some mythical future you predict.

By holding the opinion that vaccines are "sometimes necessary" is to relegate all those vaccine injured and chronically ill individuals to a new class of people who are sacrificial to a greater good that is imagined and unproven.

Ronald Kostoff

Cynthia Cournoyer,

"We don't inject the toxins you mention directly into infants' bodies. Nor are they mandated."

Laura is not asking merely for the end of mandates; she is recommending a moratorium.

For all practical purposes, many of the toxins I mention are going directly into infants' bodies, and are effectively being mandated for a large segment of the population. Don't many air pollutants enter the body of an infant? Don't many forms of wireless radiation enter the body of an infant? Sure, they can be avoided if one has sufficient resources. One can move to a location where the air is (relatively) pure, and there are locations that have relatively low background levels of EMF. By the same token, one can refuse vaccinations by changing locations, or choosing alternate schooling. For many people, however, they are trapped because of limited ability to change their circumstances, and they will be exposed to these pollutants against their will.

Ronald Kostoff

Cia Parker,

"I think a lot of life is balancing risk/benefits to the best of your ability."

Yes, life is almost a continuum of making decisions while balancing costs and benefits. But, to make sensible/rational decisions, one needs to know the costs and benefits to a reasonable level of specificity. I would maintain we don't have a good handle on the real costs/risks of most vaccines, most drugs, most forms of EMF, most pesticides, etc. If we want to follow the Precautionary Principle, we need to understand the potential costs at the front end before implementing any technology full scale.

Tim Lundeen

I agree that vaccines should be banned, they are much too dangerous.

Most people, though, think that vaccines are all that stand between our kids and mass deaths from infectious disease. As part of our message, we need to educate people about what will actually happen to the infant/child death rate if we stop vaccinating: it will not increase from "vaccine preventable" diseases, it will decrease from vaccine-caused deaths, and it will decrease because kids will have stronger immune systems. Net effect will be a substantial reduction in infant/child mortality.

Ted Kuntz

Laura, I agree with you completely. As I have gone through the experience of having a son severely and permanently injured by a vaccine I have gone from being naively pro-vaccine, to a cautious vaxxer, to someone who realizes that vaccines are inherently dangerous and destructive. As you so clearly point out, if this was any other industry or product, the practice would be stopped and those responsible would be in jail.

It is clear to me that vaccination is a religion, not a science. People agree to be vaccinated based upon blind faith and trust in individuals with white coats than in any scientific evidence that confirms safety and effectiveness.

This madness needs to stop. Anything short of the banning of this barbaric practice is immoral and unethical.

 ciaparker

We see better health in unvaxxed children now because there are no very dangerous epidemic diseases in the US. Flu can be dangerous, but rarely is, especially in children. I bought Melanie's Marvelous Measles, and commend it, but it said that Melanie eventually was exposed to measles, but did not get it, because she ate such a healthy diet. It said that children in top health would not get measles. This is not true. Measles is a beneficial disease for almost all children, but it's very contagious, and almost 100% of susceptible people exposed to it will get it, well-nourished or not. Being well-nourished usually ensures an effective immune system which can overcome the disease, but will not necessarily keep you from getting it.

Healthy children can get and die from tetanus or polio. Maybe diphtheria. Definitely yellow fever or cholera. I think it's important to remember how dangerous contagious diseases can be at their worst: being young and well-nourished will not always protect you. Most of those who died of the Spanish flu or the H1N1 flu seven years ago were young adults in the prime of life: it may be that their immune systems reacted too vigorously trying to kill the virus. That's not to promote vaccination, but to recognize that in some cases there could be good reasons to vax. Here and now we live in a privileged period of history from the standpoint of a low rate of death from contagious disease. It would be pretty safe to refuse all vaccines at this time here. But not necessarily in poor areas or poor countries.

Kathy Sincere

Laura,

Thank you for this amazing summary of toxic vaccines and the abuse of mandatory vaccination. As always, you have hit every single nail on the head! I’m sharing your article with the people in our Colorado Coalition for Vaccine Choice, advising them to read, reread and memorize the concise information you’ve provided. Warriors need to be educated and mentally ready for the battles soon to come.

On a personal note – which I know you are aware of – my family, my children, my marriage, MY LIFE has been altered, diminished, train-wrecked by vaccine injuries to my four children. One autistic, one dead, one suffering with Juvenile RA and one ADHD/bi-polar. I will never, ever give up on this fight; the same fight you are engaged with. STOP ALL VACCINATIONS FOR ALL PEOPLE. THEY ARE DESTROYING THE HUMAN RACE.

I continue to hear new stories EVERY SINGLE WEEK of vaccine-injured children and adults, most of whom never knew about VAERS or the NVICP. How convenient for pharma, doctors and the government.

I fully expect in be in a FEMA camp one day if the VACCINAZIS are allowed to continue with this Vaccine Holocaust.

Kathy Sincere CCFVC www.ccfvc.org

Grace Green

Laura, I whole-heartedly agree with your article. As someone with ASD who finds use of language very difficult I am eternally grateful to you for voicing what I would not be able to put into words myself. Thank you again, and please don't be afraid of over stating it!

Grace Green

Ronald, do you think the global economy will survive one out of two people being autistic, not to mention all the other matters you raise as well? I believe there is a Native American saying to the effect that, "You won't be able to eat dollar bills when all the land is poisoned and no food will grow." In my opinion the world economy is only benefiting the abusers.

kapoore

Now that vaccines have no liability to the pharmaceutical companies, insurance companies, and doctors; every new procedure that might carry a risk is being classified as a vaccine. There are vaccines for lung cancer (lung cancer treatment) and so on. I don't know what to make of it.

I have tried to crawl inside the brains of these people as they poison children, as they lie, as they watch children's lives being destroyed in front of their parents eyes. It boggles the mind. Nothing I have ever read comes close to explaining their psychology. I think we have to fight it and I am so grateful to Laura Hayes and the other great warriors for fighting. But we also have to duck and run for cover as much as possible. This is what I am going to recommend to my son and his new wife who want to have children. Don't even enter the system at all, pay for doctors outside the system, and it's not necessary to explain to anyone why you are doing it, or what you are doing. Parents just have to protect their children at all cost and that probably means avoiding standard medical care as much as possible.

Angus Files

Great as always Laura what Kostoff misses is that if you refuse to use astro turf etc your kids wont be expelled from school, kids taken from you and fostered ,end up in jail for harming/killing them,and then die of a broken heart when released from jail as happened to Sally Clark a lawyer in the UK.

Best of it is vaccines are that toxic they need toxic bins to be disposed off..coin dropping any where Mr Kostoff A-G-E-N-D-A

MMR RIP

Autism Mom

If Ronald Kostoff believes that if we apply an immediate moratorium on these substances: vaccines, wireless radiation, glyphosate, atrazine, myriad drugs, biosludge, fluoridation, astroturf, etc. until safety is demonstrated, the global economy will collapse!

Maybe he should consider an economy where we need to apply a lifetime of care to a vaccine injured child whose future is now totally diminished. Or a middle aged person with an auto-immune disease from being exposed to chemicals. Or a senior citizen in the throes of Alzheimer's from a lifetime of aluminum containing vaccines. In addition to the tens of thousands of other people that will suffer from other illnesses including cancer because they have been exposed to chemicals like the ones mentioned above.

In actual reality, the multi-multi-multi-billion dollar BigPharma and BigChem will be the ones to suffer when their vaccine/chemical cash cows are no longer viable, not the people.

How's that working for ya Ronald?

Linda1

Daisy,
Be specific. What particular points are nonsense and why?

Cynthia Cournoyer

Ronald.
We don't inject the toxins you mention directly into infants' bodies. Nor are they mandated. It is not mandated that I astroturf my front yard. I am free to choose fluoride-free toothpaste while my children can still attend public school. And other pharmaceuticals have been removed from the market after lawsuits. Regardless of the vaccine compensation program paying out over $3 billion, we still use the vaccines that were found to cause damage or death.

It's not about "even-handed" it's about saving lives. We already see better health in unvaccinated children. The outright denial of this possibility is why it is not about science, it is about perpetuating vaccination, at the dire expense of our children.

Laura Hayes

Ronald Kosttoff,

In a country with numerous well-funded regulatory agencies, the list of products that never should have been permitted to be made, used, or sold due to their toxic and damaging effects to humans and all that we need to survive, including surviving well versus in an increasingly-compromised state, is at the point of being seemingly endless. That does not mean we don't start eliminating such products one by one, as quickly as we can. The future of humanity depends on it. Vaccines are #1 on my list...but they are followed by many others.

Ronald Kostoff

Michael S,

"Ronald - If we do not stop the overwhelming influx of toxins into our lives soon, the majority of the next several generations of humans will have died of cancers, been neuro-damaged beyond the ability to function, or made infertile. Are you comfortable with that outcome?"

Bob Moffit,

"Correct me if I misunderstand or misstate your position ..
Apparently YOU would be "uncomfortable" following Laura's recommendation that "we need an immediate moratorium on all VACCINES for all people .. because .. according to you ... there are "hundreds (if not thousands) of other substances in the market place .. and .. a moratorium on all "those substances until safety is demonstrated" ... would cause the collapse of the global economy."

Linda1,

"Let me see here. You're suggesting that we shouldn't stop the mass poisoning of everything on earth because that would lead to poisoning the economic structure that the poisoning of everything else depends on? ARE YOU KIDDING? Am I comfortable with economic collapse if it saves life on this planet?
How do I make this in large red font?
YES."

"I have to say one more thing. Do you realize that you're asking the mother of an adult son who has the mind of a 5 year old because of vaccines whether it would have been worth hurting the economy to save him? "

Jenny,

"Nothing is collapsing, ever, Ronald, because a moratorium on all said toxins will never happen in the U.S. at the same time. The FDA and the EPA are two different regulatory bodies working on separate issues, at separate paces, with individual bureaucrats moving in and out of position, while our politicians do the same. Quit being so dramatic. Laura is referring to 1 single product line in 1 industry, that already has hundreds, if not thousands, of other products already on the market."

Let me repeat the SPECIFIC statement I made below:

"Your statement about the safety of vaccines not having been demonstrated applies equally well to hundreds (if not thousands) of other substances in the market-place, including wireless radiation, glyphosate, atrazine, myriad drugs, biosludge, fluoridation, astroturf, etc. If we apply your recommendation of an immediate moratorium on these substances until safety is demonstrated, the global economy will collapse! That's the real choice we have if we want to be even-handed for potentially toxic substances. Are you comfortable with that outcome?"

Nowhere did I state my level of comfort or discomfort with the outcome. I understand Laura's position quite well, and the reasons behind her position. There are people whose families have been impacted adversely by cell phones/cell towers, and they would like to see a similar ban on wireless radiation, or at least a reduction of allowable radiation fluxes by many orders of magnitude. There are people like myself who see the adverse effects on our climate from fossil fuel combustion, and would like to see an outright ban on their use. All I'm saying is that if we extrapolate Laura's position to other potentially toxic substances whose safety for human beings has not been demonstrated, or whose safety for the planet's health has not been demonstrated, there will be consequences. One of them will be the collapse of the global economy.

In a practical sense, if the political and social environment is created that could lead to a banning of all vaccines (if justified), such an aware environment would also be promoting the banning of many other potentially toxic substances. Today's political and social environment is not conducive to the banning of vaccines, harmful drugs, wireless radiation, glyphosate, fossil fuels, et al.

Laura Hayes

Stan K,

In this particular article, I wanted to clearly show that with regard to safety alone, not even one vaccine should ever have been approved, and therefore, their continuance should not be permitted.

Additionally, it should go without saying that no medical treatment or procedure should ever be mandated. Unfortunately, that moral and ethical truth needs to be repeated again, and again, and again.

Thanks for chiming in, Stan :)

 ciaparker

Linda,

I don't think that's a fair way to put the question. My daughter was brain-damaged by an encephalitic reaction to the hep-B vaccine at birth, given without permission and against my express wishes. Those are the grounds for my objection. I would not want the vaccine taken off the market entirely, but think its use should be limited to babies born to mothers positive for hep-B. In those babies it can be lifesaving.

Parents who consented to the vaccines which damaged their children should have informed themselves better, though in some cases it may have been a good idea to get the vaccine, but was a tragic, unforeseeable reaction. I consented to C's getting the DTaP booster at 18 months which erased her only words. That was my fault, no one else's. At that time I didn't know how dangerous the pertussis vaccine was, I thought the acellular version was safe. Or maybe it was just what everyone thought at that time, not long after the introduction of the supposedly-safer acellular vaccine. I should have waited and maybe gotten only the DT after she turned two.

But if a toddler is run over and killed by a drunk driver, I don't think it's reasonable to ban all trucks or all alcohol, but severe penalties for drunk drivers would be reasonable. Extensive information on vaccines given and the diseases they prevent (and their frequency) should be mandatory, but then the parent should be free to decide for or against.

Reader

In a sense I like that the AAP has revealed the true extent of its cavalier attitude toward those it purports to protect. American children have never been sicker and the blood will squarely be on their hands this way. Them and the CDC, pharmaceutical co's.

 ciaparker

Michael S.,

The world population is so large that it would not be possible to feed it even minimally using only organically-grown food. Most people in the US would not be able to afford buying only organic food, and would not want to be forced to do so. I am against most pharma drugs, but recognize that some are life-saving such as antibiotics in many cases, steroids for emergencies, insulin for diabetics, etc. They can all be dangerous or deadly.

I think we'll have to proceed slowly, trying to educate people as to the facts that we know, and offer realistic ways forward. We can't eliminate every dangerous ingredient, pesticide, herbicide, drug, or other chemicals quickly, and in some cases it wouldn't be desirable to do so.

 ciaparker

Ronald,
I was thinking that. I eat a lot of Oikos yogurt, C eats a lot of So Delicious coconut yogurt. We get a lot of organic stuff, but not all the ingredients are 100% safe, and we have to get some things which are not organic, and if you look at the list of ingredients, it's scary. Nothing is 100% safe, and we just have to do the best we can with our knowledge, level of comfort, and what we can afford. I would be very unhappy if we could buy nothing which didn't have anything which hadn't been proven 100% safe. I think fluoride toothpaste prevents cavities, but it can also cause many conditions, including bone cancer in teenaged boys. I went through a scare a couple of years ago when a dentist said that C had small cavities on three sets of molars (from her braces), and wanted to fill them. I didn't think she could tolerate having an anesthetic injected and her teeth drilled, and composite fillings put in (no mercury). It would have had to be under very expensive and somewhat dangerous complete anesthesia. I asked about remineralization of the cavities, and another dentist thought it would be possible. I directed C in brushing with super-fluoride toothpaste every night for a year, and the areas were remineralized and didn't need to be filled. So even though I was aware of the potential danger of super-fluoridated toothpaste, I thought it was worth the risk to try to avoid general anesthesia and teeth permanently weakened with fillings. She didn't seem to have any bad reaction to the super fluoride, but I"ll probably never know if she did or not, or will have a reaction to it in the future.

I would be very unhappy if I had not been able to correct the incipient cavities with super-fluoride. I think a lot of life is balancing risk/benefits to the best of your ability. Vaccines can do good when they prevent dangerous cases of disease. They can also inflict serious harm or death. But if you think about our world before 1988 (the Hib vaccine doubling the routine mercury burden overnight), there were few children with neurological or autoimmune disease. Even giving the DPT, MMR, and polio vaccines universally didn't result in the extremely high levels of damaged children we see now. I think everyone should make this decision for him or herself, trying to seek moderation and use vaccines only for real dangers (in his or her judgment), bearing in mind that extreme disability or death may result no matter what he chooses.

Stan K.

Great article and I agree. However, to truly strike at the heart of vaccine fraud one also needs to focus not just on safety, but equally on the utter lack of scientifically demonstrated effectiveness, both historically and presently.

They have never been show to be effective at reducing or eliminating disease, and this applies equally to polio and smallpox.

So long as the fictitious and unsubstantiated stories of effectiveness go unchallenged, any arguments about safety will always be weighed against false these claims. Why concede such grand and hollow claims to vaccine proponents?

daisy bright

I've rarely seen such an amazing collection of unscientific nonsense on one page. This is simply an appalling piece of nonsense.

 ciaparker

I disagree with making all vaccines illegal. I am in favor of trying to ensure that everyone has a lot of useful information to consider when making the vaccine decision, and of course no vaccine should be mandatory for anyone.

Vaccines are a tool which can be useful. I think it would be as bad as vaccine mandates to go in the other direction and mandate no vaccines. Vaccines do have dangerous ingredients, and always cause an inflammatory reaction which can cause brain damage or autoimmune disease. Everyone should know that and be free to refuse them. But some of the VPDs can be extremely disabling or deadly, and everyone must also be free to choose the vaccines to prevent them if they decided that was the wisest thing to do. Nothing is 100% safe.

There are cases of diphtheria now in Southeast Asia. I doubt diphtheria could come back here because of our almost-universal adequate nutrition and living conditions, but almost universal is not universal and I think it might come back in some areas if no one vaxxed. I'm not saying that everyone or anyone should feel obligated to get it, but that if it came back, many people would want it, and it should be available to them, now and always. It's possible that polio might come back under certain conditions, and tetanus. And the vaccines for them should be an available choice. Yellow fever killed tens of thousands in the US in the nineteenth century. Same there. Wherever there is an outbreak of yellow fever, I think the vaccine should be available, even knowing that it has caused encephalitis and organ meltdown (just like the disease does). Or rubella. I am in favor of deliberately giving rubella (and measles, mumps, and chickenpox) to schoolchildren who have not gotten them. However, there's no short-term likelihood of that happening. Personally, I wouldn't take the chance of getting the dangerous rubella vaccine (I didn't have to, as I had natural rubella as a child), but congenital rubella syndrome is horrifying. Like polio, it is very likely that it was potentiated by chemical co-factors, but for women in a society, the need to make a choice is the same. I think it would be a reasonable choice for a woman to get the rubella vaccine well before pregnancy if she had not had the opportunity to get natural immunity. How could you forbid that she get it? There can be no risk-free option, but in many cases, the vaccine is less risky than the disease, although often you cannot know the risk until you have reacted.

Linda1

Laura,
No namby-pamby "I am resolutely, absolutely, positively, please don't attack me, provaccine, I had all my children vaccinated" disclaimer out of you! GOOD! There is no way to justify the use of these products. They should be taken off the market. Period. Thanks for being a courageous trailblazer.

Jenny

Nothing is collapsing, ever, Ronald, because a moratorium on all said toxins will never happen in the U.S. at the same time. The FDA and the EPA are two different regulatory bodies working on separate issues, at separate paces, with individual bureaucrats moving in and out of position, while our politicians do the same. Quit being so dramatic. Laura is referring to 1 single product line in 1 industry, that already has hundreds, if not thousands, of other products already on the market.

With NO moratorium, that one particular product line will end in the collapse of the pharmaceutical industry because it has damaged human genetic/epigentic expression so severely that people are dropping dead right and left in their 50s and 60s now. Dead people can't buy pharmaceuticals (or any other market products, including those that have other toxic chemicals in them). The folks that currently have lived into their 80s and 90s in the U.S. are about to be a bygone era - they were not subject to the increased vaccination recommendations starting in the 80s and moving forward. Once their numbers drop off the map, we'll see how quickly the average lifespan drops in the new demographics. By aggressively pursuing wiping out vaccine exemptions pharma execs are wiping out their own future markets for all other medications, and the profits and dividends that go with them. It may take a chunk out the chemical industry on the way, too. It surprising to me that the oil and chemical industries have not yet come out against vaccine mandates given the logical long-term financial consequences of keeping them on the market.

Linda1

Dr. Kostoff,
I have to say one more thing. Do you realize that you're asking the mother of an adult son who has the mind of a 5 year old because of vaccines whether it would have been worth hurting the economy to save him?

Linda1

Dr. Kostoff,
"If we apply your recommendation of an immediate moratorium on these substances until safety is demonstrated, the global economy will collapse! That's the real choice we have if we want to be even-handed for potentially toxic substances. Are you comfortable with that outcome?"

Let me see here. You're suggesting that we shouldn't stop the mass poisoning of everything on earth because that would lead to poisoning the economic structure that the poisoning of everything else depends on? ARE YOU KIDDING? Am I comfortable with economic collapse if it saves life on this planet?

How do I make this in large red font?

YES.

Sun~Rose

Why won't tis excellent article paste when I've copied it?

Bob Moffit

@ Ronald K.

"Your statement about the safety of vaccines not having been demonstrated applies equally well to hundreds (if not thousands) of other substances in the market-place ......... your recommendation of an immediate moratorium on these substances until safety is demonstrated, the global economy will collapse! Are you comfortable with that outcome?"

Correct me if I misunderstand or misstate your position ..

Apparently YOU would be "uncomfortable" following Laura's recommendation that "we need an immediate moratorium on all VACCINES for all people .. because .. according to you ... there are "hundreds (if not thousands) of other substances in the market place .. and .. a moratorium on all "those substances until safety is demonstrated" ... would cause the collapse of the global economy.

It's probably just me .. but .. I believe Laura's call for a moratorium on VACCINES to be a "common sense" solution to stop the ongoing VACCINE HOLOCAUST.

On the other hand ... rejecting Laura's call for a moratorium because there are "hundreds (if not thousands) of other substances in the market place" ... seems a complete surrender to those guilty of perpetrating the VACCINE HOLOCAUST .. because .. as you apparently believe .. our global economy it too "BIG TO FAIL" .. therefore .. it would be WRONG to a call for a "moratorium on vaccines" that would hold accountable the manufacturers, distributors and government regulators that PROFIT from marketing "unsafe substances" found in VACCINES.

Will Laura's moratorium stop ALL "unsafe substances" .. no .. but .. it sure as hell would BEGIN stopping at least those recommended and approved .. by government health officials and regulators .. "unsafe substances" in VACCINES.

I would consider that WIN FOR US.

AnneJ

"We need public outrage and criminal proceedings for incompetent, negligent, and corrupt government regulators, and for pharmaceutical company executives who are destroying the health and well being of our children as they rake in billions from their toxic, destructive, and deadly vaccine products."
I've been dealing with the vaccine-injuries of all three of my kids for many, many years now. I'm appalled at the lack of outrage surrounding this issue, especially as evidence continues to mount that vaccines can and do harm far more often than reported . The consequences of our out-of-control vaccine schedule are horrific. It's not just about autism. What will it take to wake people up?
The future of our country is at stake, and the general population remains largely asleep on this issue. Until those who are responsible are actually held accountable and punished, nothing will change. These big corporations should not be able to just buy politicians and their own complete liability protection, then literally get away with murder.

Michael S.

@ Ronald Kostoff - "If we apply your recommendation of an immediate moratorium on these substances until safety is demonstrated, the global economy will collapse! That's the real choice we have if we want to be even-handed for potentially toxic substances. Are you comfortable with that outcome?"

Ronald - If we do not stop the overwhelming influx of toxins into our lives soon, the majority of the next several generations of humans will have died of cancers, been neuro-damaged beyond the ability to function, or made infertile. Are you comfortable with that outcome?

Benedetta

I go around and around with this, that it might be all on purpose.

There might be a lot of people that have set themselves over us, and think they need to control populations. Indeed whether they mean to or not - they have>

They have cleaned out a large area and created the Daniel Boone National Forest. It might have cost more than it will ever be worth morally.

They might be keeping down the black populations -- but look at the misery of maiming so many. The MMR shot affecting them a lot more up to the age of 3 while the rest are only affected to the age of 1 year. IS that correct what I just said? I don't seem how though - So I guess I am wrong. .

Brett Wilcox

This article ranks as one of the single most concise and most powerful write-ups on the vaccine scam ever.

Jesus baby

"Do you see a pattern of absurdity here?"

Yes.

Janet Presson

EXCELLENT!!!!!!!!!

Ronald Kostoff

Laura Hayes,

"Since our government regulators have failed to require or ensure vaccine safety, it must be assumed, and can be shown, that not one single vaccine is safe or advisable. Therefore:

What is required is an immediate moratorium on all vaccinations, for all people."

Your statement about the safety of vaccines not having been demonstrated applies equally well to hundreds (if not thousands) of other substances in the market-place, including wireless radiation, glyphosate, atrazine, myriad drugs, biosludge, fluoridation, astroturf, etc. If we apply your recommendation of an immediate moratorium on these substances until safety is demonstrated, the global economy will collapse! That's the real choice we have if we want to be even-handed for potentially toxic substances. Are you comfortable with that outcome?

Rtp

Hallelujah!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)