Getting Real at the Real Truth Health Conference
A Reality Check for the Vicious and Discriminatory Dallas Morning News

Protect Your Religious Exemption Rights: Call Congress Today

Autism action networkUPDATE:  

Good news. Rep. Joseph Kennedy (D-MA-4) has generously requested a meeting with representatives of the Autism Action Network to discuss his House Resolution, H. R. 5272, the "Do No Harm Act." In a letter received yesterday Rep. Kennedy wrote, "I would welcome the opportunity to meet with you and discuss your legal analysis of the "Do No Harm Act" and how we might work together to advance research and treatments for autism while still protecting religious freedoms guaranteed to each American in the Constitution."

A meeting in his district is being scheduled.  We believe that language in the bill could be used to eliminate religious exemption rights from vaccine mandates. We do not believe the intention of the bill is to threaten vaccine exemptions rights, but legislation can have all kinds of unintended and unforeseen consequences. Our goal is to assure H. R. 5272 is modified so that there is no conceivable threat to rights to religious exemptions from vaccine mandates.

From our friends at Autism Action Network:

Please call Congress today

Protect your religious exemption rights

Religious exemptions from vaccine mandates in all states are under threat from legislation in Your_rightsCongress that would severely curtail Americans' ability to exercise our First Amendment rights. House Resolution H. R. 5272, introduced by Rep. Joseph P. Kennedy (D-MA-4), seeks to limit The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, purportedly to prevent discrimination against one person by another person for religious reasons. But the bill is so broadly drawn that any exercise of religious belief that conflicts with any federal policy, whether based on law, regulation or executive order, could be considered discrimination and therefore illegal. Kennedy's bill in effect repeals the idea that, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

Here's what you can do, first if you are an Autism Action Network subscriber, or support the work we do, please help us to fight this bill by making a donation to our annual fundraising drive here:

Next click on the link below and to send a message to your member of the House of Representative and your two US Senators expressing your opposition to H. R. 5272.

And please call the offices of your two US Senators and your Representative and politley let them know you want them to oppose Kennedy's H.R. 5272 and any other legislation that will weaken our rights under the First Amendment or the Religious Freedom restoration Act of 1993.

In what can only be a perverse pun, Kennedy named the bill the "Do No Harm Act" turning on its head the proscription to physicians associated with the Hippocratic oath to "First, do no harm" to patients under their care.

Among other provisions, H. R. 5272 prohibits using religious reasons as a basis to deny "access to, information about, provision of or coverage for, any healthcare item." There is no reason why this language could not be used to argue that a religious exemption is an illegal use of religious beliefs as a basis to deny a child a "healthcare item."

Kennedy's bill would allow anyone who feels threatened, or even offended, by anyone else's child (or an adult) foregoing a vaccine for a religious reason to claim the exemption is a form of discrimination. The bill states religious freedom "should not be interpreted to authorize an exemption from generally applicable law that imposes meaningful harm, including dignitary harm, on a third party. " "Dignitary harm," we believe this term is so vague that your First Amendment rights could take a backseat to some busybody getting in a snit.

Forty-seven still states have religious exemptions. Rep. Kennedy's bill may provide the grounds to challenge state exemption laws in federal courts as a form of religious discrimination.

Kennedy's bill has gathered 30 co-sponsors so far. No similar legislation has been introduced in the US Senate yet.  You can read the bill here:

Please share this message with friends and family and post ot social networks.



Acceptance vs curing

Can someone do a comprehensive analysis pointing out that any of these no religious exemption laws could backfire on anyone. On all of us? How do we get this across? Stamping on my religious freedom to say that --even though I know God does not want me to further injure my child with toxins I have to do it anyway--is a slippery slope for ALL.

If you at right wing what if some crazy far left-wing person in power decided that global warming could be stopped by forced sterilization--greater good argument .

If you are left wing what if some crazy far right-wing person in body used these laws to get rid of birth control and/or abortion? Greater good argument .

Denise Anderstrom Douglass

Thank you, AOA for posting this. Massachusetts only has the Religious Exemption and the Medical Exemption; some states also have the Philosophical Exemption. It is plain as dirt that there is a huge push coming from the CDC and other Federal interests to eliminate any remaining exemptions anywhere.

John Stone

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)