Religion and Conscience: Vaccine Rights
Dachel Wake Up: CA School Funding In Jeopardy Post SB277

Contest: The Vaccine-Friendly Plan: Dr. Paul's Safe and Effective Approach to Immunity and Health-from Pregnancy Through Your Child's Teen Years

Vaccine Friendly PlanWe have a copy of The Vaccine-Friendly Plan: Dr. Paul's Safe and Effective Approach to Immunity and Health-from Pregnancy Through Your Child's Teen Years by Dr. Paul Thomas MD and Jennifer Margulis PhD from Ballantine Books to give away. 

Leave a comment to enter!

An accessible and reassuring guide to childhood health and immunity from a pediatrician who’s both knowledgeable about the latest scientific research and respectful of a family’s risk factors, health history, and concerns
In The Vaccine-Friendly Plan, Paul Thomas, M.D., presents his proven approach to building immunity: a new protocol that limits a child’s exposure to aluminum, mercury, and other neurotoxins while building overall good health. Based on the results from his pediatric practice of more than eleven thousand children, as well as data from other credible and scientifically minded medical doctors, Dr. Paul’s vaccine-friendly protocol gives readers
• recommendations for a healthy pregnancy and childbirth
• vital information about what to expect at every well child visit from birth through adolescence
• a slower, evidence-based vaccine schedule that calls for only one aluminum-containing shot at a time
• important questions to ask about your child’s first few weeks, first years, and beyond
• advice about how to talk to health care providers when you have concerns
• the risks associated with opting out of vaccinations
• a practical approach to common illnesses throughout the school years
• simple tips and tricks for healthy eating and toxin-free living at any age
The Vaccine-Friendly Plan presents a new standard for pediatric care, giving parents peace of mind in raising happy, healthy children.

Advance praise for The Vaccine-Friendly Plan

“Finally, a book about vaccines that respects parents! If you choose only one book to read on the topic, read The Vaccine-Friendly Plan. This impeccably researched, well-balanced book puts you in the driver’s seat and empowers you to make conscientious vaccine decisions for your family.”—Peggy O’Mara, editor and publisher, Mothering Magazine 


Tim Lundeen

@linda1 -- thanks for noting this, awful. I posted on my facebook page.

You can email to complain to Jeff Bezos, I'll be sending one shortly.


Vaccine don't work in any case. The Spanish Flu was cause by Vaccines and poisoning the flu victims with massive does of ASPIRIN. Read Eleanor Bean-the Poison Needle and Bayer and Death: 1918 and Aspirin-A 5 part series:

The world has believed for almost a century that a new and virulent virus came out of nowhere worldwide and killed millions in 1918. Two reports, one published in 2008 and the second in 2009, lay that myth to rest for good.

The first report came as a press release on August 19, 2008, from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID):

“Bacteriologic and histopathologic results from published autopsy series clearly and consistently implicated secondary bacterial pneumonia caused by common upper respiratory–tract bacteria in most influenza fatalities.”

People were killed by common bacteria found in the upper respiratory tract, according to research uncovered by F. William Engdahl:

“The 20 to 40 million deaths worldwide from the great 1918 Influenza Pandemic were NOT due to ‘flu’ or a virus, but to pneumonia caused by massive bacterial infection.”

The NIAID press release did not, however, address what caused the bacterial infections, but research by Dr. Karen Starko does. She implicates aspirin, dovetailing with the NIAID research on pneumonia from massive bacterial infection, and goes further in also explaining the extreme rapidity of death:

“Mortality was driven by 2 overlapping clinical-pathologic syndromes: an early, severe acute respiratory distress (ARDS)-like condition, which was estimated to have caused 10%-15% of deaths (sequential autopsy series are lacking); and a subsequent, aggressive bacterial pneumonia “superinfection,” which was present in the majority of deaths.”

In looking at reports of those who died, two distinct groups became readily apparent to Starko, based on a very distinctive time frame from health to death:

1. People who died of pneumonia from a bacteria infection became sick and things deteriorated at varying rates from there to death; and

2. People who died so astoundingly fast that those deaths became a classic part of the frightening legend of the 1918 “flu” – people perfectly well in the morning and dead within a matter of hours.

In both groups, aspirin is now the likely causative agent.

Think about it Cia, the electronic microscope wasn't invented until 1930. How could they know if a virus was present let alone what kind of virus it was.

Polio-we've had that debate repeatably and there is no documentation that the vaccine was effective. Even Jonas Salk had to finally admit that the vaccine was the sole cause of Polio and even today as they saturated third world countries with the Polio vaccine it's not only causing Polio but NPAFP.

In 1976, Dr Jonas Salk, creator of the killed-virus vaccine used in the 1950's, testified that the live-virus vaccine (used almost exclusively in the U.S. from the early 1960's to 2000) was the “principal if not sole cause” of all reported polio cases in the U.S. since 1961 (Washington Post,September 24,1976). The virus remains in the throat for one to two weeks and in the feces for up to two months. Thus, vaccine recipients are at risk, and can potentially spread the disease, as long as fecal excretion of the virus continues ( American Academy of Pediatrics, Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases:1986(Elk Grove Village, Illinois: AAP):284–5.

In February 1992 the Federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published an admission that the live-virus vaccine had become the dominant cause of polio in the United States (Strebel PM., et al. Epidemiology of poliomyletis in U.S. n 1992, one decade after the last reported case of indigenous wild virus associated disease, Clinical Infectious Diseases CDC, February 1992:568–79).

Polio vaccine only SEEMED to work when the CDC changed the diagnostic criteria in 1958. Cases were diagnosed as polio originally if they displayed symptom for 24 hours:
In 1958, the CDC formally adopted the “Best available paralytic poliomyelitis case count” or BAPPCC:
“Cases must be clinically and epidemiologically compatible with poliomyelitis, must have resulted in paralysis, and must have a residual neurological deficit 60 days after onset of initial symptoms. .. the BAPPCC does not include cases of nonparalytic poliomyelitis, of those in which paralysis is more transient.
More than 95% of people who had polio were Asymptomatic-didn't know they were infected. About 2-3 % displayed only a mild upper respiratory distress like a cold. It is estimated that 1 maybe 2% had paralysis that resolved itself within a year and 1% of polio cases were permanently disabled. The number are flux because many people were unaware until years later that they had been infected. If you look at the number of Polio cases where the vaccine was given the numbers clearly demonstrate the vaccine caused a significant rise in the number of Polio cases which is why many countries outside of the US wouldn't use it.

I just read the most remarkable statement about the Smallpox vaccine. Smallpox and Polio are considered the superstars and darling of the Pro-Vaccine cultist. They are the two vaccine that are held up in some sort of divine light as saviors. Here is a partial statement from Dr. Thomas Mack of the USC from a speech he gave in 2002 when Bush was trying to push mandatory Smallpox vaccine on the US. Dr. Mack an expert on Smallpox with extensive research gave this speech at the Meeting of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices held at the Atlanta Marriott Century Center, Atlanta Marriott Century Center Atlanta, Georgia, on June 19 and 20, 2002.

The verbatim transcript has been moved according to the CDC's website and according to Google is : Oops. According to federal laws all CDC/FDA/HHS etc documents are public records so they aren't suppose to be "lost". Fortunately dozens of other sites maintained copies of Dr. Mack's speech.
Dr. Mack testimony at ACIP Smallpox meeting: Atlanta, Georgia, on June 19 and 20, 2002:

I believe it was Dr. Mack's speech that swayed the CDC to not implement mass vaccinations. Here are some pertinent statements but read the paper at the link for context:

-So in my opinion, the propensity for spread in both these circumstances is substantially greater than it would be in the United States today.

- To me, it should be an extremely important consideration in all of your deliberations because in the absence of VIG, any extensive vaccination would be extremely dangerous.

-...but the case fatality is probably less than is usually advertised. And the reason for that is that most series are heavily loaded with children. If you look at the age-specific case-fatality rate, it's much lower among adults. And so I would estimate that if we had an importation today in the adult population, the case fatality would probably be around ten to 15 percent.

-It does have a truly terrifying pathognomonic appearance, and that's one of the characteristics that would make control much easier. Again, as has been mentioned, there's acute illness during a brief period of infectiousness. There are no reservoirs or vectors. There is a finite half-life in the environment.
And most importantly, there's a big -- one to two -- one to three-week interval between generations in which activity for surveillance and containment takes place. And by and large, transmission within social limits is what occurs, not within the population at large. And these, by and large, cannot be sustained.

*****In fact, were there no smallpox eradication program, my guess is that smallpox would have died out anyway, it just would have taken a lot longer.***

-Unexposed community members have negligible risk. There is a substantial risk from a vaccine, as you'll hear in a moment. It is "the single most dangerous live vaccine". We would still need to vaccinate and identify contacts. We would need personnel and resources for surveillance rather than mass vaccination.
That protection will not be maintained. It will gradually wane and we'll have to do it again and again. The informed consent that you would have to prepare to vaccinate somebody in the public, if it's honest, would have to say that the dangers would exceed the benefits. And even if you fudged those words in such a way that you were happy and thought it would be convincing, an awful lot of people who ultimately might be exposed would not be convinced. You'd have to go back again anyway. So I don't think it would work and I don't think it would be beneficial.

*****If people are worried about endemic smallpox, it disappeared from this country not because of our mass herd immunity. It disappeared because of our economic development. And that's why it disappeared from Europe and many other countries, and it will not be sustained here,even if there were several importations, I'm sure. ********It's not from universal vaccination.******** Please read entire speech.

-There are no vaccines for scarlet fever-very contagious, Bubonic Plague-although extremely rare cases do happen, Epidemic Erysipelas, Typhus Fevers, Cholera, Scurvy Strep throat- diseases that simply died out because nothing interfered with the natural decline of the diseases. As Dr. Mack states in his speech the decline of disease has more to do with nutrition, clean water, improved hygiene, development of waste disposal & sanitation systems, government control of the food industry in which laws were put into place to monitor manufacture and sell food items-especially perishables like meets & dairy-all of these contributed to disease elimination. Also, isolation of sick people which was difficult to do in the earlier decades because of the housing situation where entire communities were infected because they lived is such poor and close conditions. This is why smallpox infected more African Americas & other minority groups in the US-living conditions. Read some of the earlier smallpox studies before the 1960's and one of the frequent comments about outbreaks-which were rare was living conditions of the cases.

“The questionable contribution of medical measures to the decline of mortality in the United States in the twentieth century“. McKinlay JB, McKinlay SM, Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1977 Summer; 55(3): 405-28.

Vaccines Did Not Save Us – 2 Centuries Of Official Statistics



I just went to Amazon to look a the book's sale page. Saw an embedded "Related video short" "How to Know When to Get Which Vaccines for Your Child" and clicked on it thinking that it was from the authors. WRONG, although others may not realize that this video is not from the authors, since it is on the page and is supposedly "related". The video is a primer on all the vaccines that children need to get - clear instructions for parents on which ones to get and when - strictly according to the CDC schedule. HORRIBLE. Deliberately planted propaganda on Dr. Thomas' Amazon page. Sabotage. You have to see this to believe it.

Dan Olmsted

Rtp based on my own research I disagree that paralysis increased after the vaccine.


Vaccination does actually work in most cases, the question is whether the disease protection for rare or usually mild diseases is worth the risk of the vaccines, bearing in mind that vaccines depress the immune system and the diseases usually provide some to many benefits. Polio was real and it was terrible, and the vaccines stopped it. I was reading about the Spanish flu this morning, and talk about a terrible disease that swept the world and killed millions in a year and a half! If a disease like that appeared and was killing so many people, I'd take the vaccine for it, no question, and hope for the best. But at this time there is no disease that fearsome, and not vaxxing is usually a safe approach and completely avoids vaccine damage. Think about 1985. They gave the DPT, the MMR, and the polio vaccine, and that was all. I think the tetanus vaccine may be a good idea, but none of the others here and now. Diphtheria was no longer around in 1985 or now, nor were pertussis, measles, mumps, rubella, or polio. There were no large numbers of children dying of anything even without any of the newer vaccines, and pertussis and measles were no longer very dangerous, mumps never was. But if diphtheria or polio came back, nearly everyone would want to vax for them, including me. The vaccines can be very dangerous, and the number given now is very dangerous, but if children on my block were getting diphtheria or polio, I would be grateful to have access to the vaccines for them.


A vaccine apologist that actually admits that EtHg and Aluminum are neurotoxins!

This is refreshing, but there are still fatal flaws in even the theory of vaccination in general. It is a neat idea, but I am not convinced that it is actually works in most cases.


I agree with the "no" comments. Why inject aluminum into a baby when we know that it finds its way into the organs including the brain and causes cell death by disruption of the mitochondria. It interferes with gene expression, opening some bad genes, and maybe closing some good ones. It all seems so drastic and unnecessary when the disease, even whooping cough, is something most babies get over while aluminum poisoning may hang on for months if not years. Of course, my life experience is different than his. I grew up during the Fifties and Sixties when everyone got the measles and survived. Everyone got the chicken pox and survived. I grew up in the height of the polio epidemic and don't even remember anyone who had polio. There were no pediatricians back then. So maybe if no one is there to diagnose the problem it doesn't exist.

But I also agree with the comments that say it's a start, and it's also admitting something is wrong. Still, it seems like the cumulative vaccine load is about the same--way too many.


Rates of paralysis have increased since the polio vaccine.

Ergo, everything we have been told about this issue is a barefaced lie.


Science is pure.  People are corrupt.

Dr. Thomas is just guessing, which is all that can be done in the absence of meaningful research.

George stevens

The fact he is changed the schedule due to aluminum mercury etc atleast does acknowledge there was a problem in the first place. Its a start.


"I have a feeling that Dr. Thomas is trying to salvage an illegitimate profession."

I do, too.

"Vaccine injury is real. It isn't rare. The only way to stop the Vaccine Holocaust is to stop the vaccinating. Instead of endless propaganda campaigns to vaccinate, vaccinate, vaccinate, we need education campaigns regarding the tried and true, risk-free ways, to protect, maintain, and enhance health. We already have that knowledge, and we need to be spreading it widely now."

Agree with every word you stated, Laura, but most especially the above.


Dr. Thomas mentions Dr. Thomson's CDC study, and thinks that it is wise to delay the MMR until at least three years old on the basis of its findings. And it is probable that it IS much safer to get it at that time. I disagree that m, m, and r are such fearful diseases that it's worth the risk of getting the vaccine(s) after the age of three. We are aware of many terrible reactions to it at ages older than three. Dr. Thomas recommends acting on the precautionary principle of avoiding what may cause harm. I agree that rubella can be a terrible affliction to fetuses, and think we should seriously promote actually giving the disease to fifth grade girls at the end of the school year to give them permanent immunity long before childbearing. Other than that, we should just let measles and mumps come back. The precautionary principle would demand this.


Sorry, I should have said that both Dr. Thomas and Dr. Sears recommend absolute avoidance of mercury in vaccines, and both present evidence that there is no safe amount of mercury in the vaccines that still have them, even in "trace amounts." They both think that aluminum-containing vaccines may be all right if other factors indicate they'd be a good idea, but both recommend minimizing the dose by getting the lower-aluminum brand or spacing them out. Again, every parent must inform himself as thoroughly as possible, and then proceed, knowing that there is no absolute safe position to take on this.

Tim Lundeen

I agree that this book is progress; anything mainstream that questions vaccines is progress. I feel the same way about Vaccines 2.0.

But I also agree with Laura Hayes that ALL vaccines are extremely dangerous, and with the concerns raised by ciaparker.

Anyone who reads and understands the science from the site would never recommend vaccines with aluminum adjuvant, or allow them to be given to their children.

Another critical issue is vaccine contamination: how do you know that what your child gets is not contaminated with mycoplasma, retroviruses, and viruses? These can be devastating, and there is no way to know.

Kathy Sincere

Kim -
What is Progress? Moreover, what is "progressive" about this doctor. Because he's a priest in the religion of vaccinology and has altered the doctrine a bit?

I'm sorry to be so harsh, but people with children who are sickened/deceased from vaccines should not accept anything less than honest complete truth. That’s why I read Age of Autism daily. I lost four children to vaccine injury and death in this war and nothing less than complete Truth will satisfy me.

Be Brave. Stand up. Speak out – Del Bigtree


I'm afraid that the young mom might be persuaded that Dr. Thomas was telling her everything she needed to know about vaccine decisions, when that is not the case at all, he apparently having been unaware of the points I mentioned earlier that I think would indicate to most moms that she should decline the DTaP, MMR, Hib, and Prevnar vaccines at any age. Yes, information is good, and I think everyone should read as much as possible on both sides, but I agree that it would have been a good idea for AoA to include a caveat that this is really not a book for those worried about autism and autoimmune disease being caused by vaccines. I agree with those who said here that aluminum is very dangerous in vaccines: Dr. Thomas, like Dr. Sears, recommends caution with the aluminum and mercury-containing vaccines, but not absolute avoidance. Young moms need to know that they need to be very sure that the diseases they vaccinate against are a serious enough threat to their child to warrant taking the risk of a vaccine, whether live or adjuvanted, and walk into it knowing full well which vaccines have aluminum, mercury, formaldehyde, ethylene glycol, antibiotics, foreign proteins from the culture media, and so on, and how dangerous these may be. And walk into it knowing that every vaccine causes a heightened state of inflammation, in some more than others, and that this can cause encephalitis or any one of the many autoimmune diseases. It may be acute or chronic and permanent. And there is no cure for it in allopathic medicine.

The book The Solution gives information about getting and giving homeopathic nosodes to prevent the most dangerous VPDs (though they are available for all of them), and that's a much safer route to take.


I have not read Dr. Thomas' book. I only know him from his youtube presence where he seems like a very nice person who genuinely cares. However, I don't understand how he can recommend any vaccine or schedule as safe or effective when it is clear that none have been properly tested, problems abound even in those he recommends, and there has been fraud within the vaccine industry and government agencies. His report of use in 11,000 patients is not enough to guarantee safety when used in many millions. Although I believe he is sincere, I hesitate to take the advice of one practitioner who may be missing subtle short or long term adverse effects. As but one example, how would he know if his patient population was losing 5 IQ points? He wouldn't, nor would their parents know.

I have a feeling that Dr. Thomas is trying to salvage an illegitimate profession.

Managing Editor

Kathy, it's our job to share news and info - this book is very big news especially since it is from a large mainstream publisher. I learned a great phrase 20+ years ago from a mentor:

Don't Punish Progress

A young Mom to be might see the title, the MD and say, "I guess it can't hurt to do a bit of homework...."

Thanks for commenting. Kim

Kathy Sincere

I’m disturbed that Age of Autism would promote the book of a doctor who still gives shots with aluminum – oh….one at a time. What difference does that make?! He also still gives the MMR and DTaP to all his patients, knowing the side effects of each and how ineffective they are, and that they spread the very diseases they are meant to prevent?! I could go on and on, but Laura Hayes has said it all. Ditto every single word you wrote, Laura.

Here’s information from AoA on aluminum in vaccines, and from Dr. Chris Exley, one of the world’s leading authority on aluminum, especially in vaccines.


I'm reading this book now. Dr. Thomas is obviously a very compassionate doctor. His parents were Methodist missionaries in Rhodesia in the 1960s: an African child his age who was his friend died of measles at five, and the child's sister, who grew up near Dr. Thomas' family and moved to New Hampshire, died suddenly at a young age of a heart attack, her husband having already died, leaving five young children whom Dr. Thomas and his wife adopted without any hesitation.

In this book he offers advice for every stage of a child's development, from pregnancy on, with a lot of warnings about avoiding chemicals ubiquitous in many products. He opens with a description of a one-year old child who came to his office, happy, healthy, active, alert, who, when he came back a year later, was passive, closed in on himself, had lost his speech, and was autistic. He talks about how vaccines had caused autism and other conditions in children in the last few decades, and how concerned he was about them. He leaves the ultimate decision to the parents, and says that he is what Dr. Sears calls a vaccine-friendly doctor.

All of this is very good, of course. I'm concerned, though, that, for instance, he strongly recommends giving the DTaP series starting at two months old. He says it's very safe, while pertussis can be devastating at that age. And that's something I don't understand. The immune system of young infants hasn't developed enough to react appropriately to vaccines, so that it provides no protection to them to give them vaccines at that time. The rationale is that it lays the groundwork for disease protection after the third or fourth vaccine in the series. Unfortunately, it often doesn't work even then. The Manitoba study proved that starting the series at two months old, as per schedule, causes asthma in one in nine American children. Starting at five months old or later results in asthma in "only" one in twenty. Other studies show that not giving the pertussis vaccine at all results in asthma in maybe one in a hundred, and giving no vaccines in an even lower rate of the sometimes-fatal asthma. The pertussis vaccine can also cause allergies, seizure disorder, SIDS, and autism (as in my child, whose only words were erased when she got the DTaP booster at 18 months old, and she was diagnosed with autism two months later).

Yes, pertussis can be dangerous to young infants: it kills about one in every 200 infants who gets pertussis before the age of three months old. The shot does them no good, but does do them a lot of harm. Sheltering them at home would prevent most pertussis infections, and treating them with high-dose IV vitamin C, as per the Dr. Suzanne Humphries protocol), would successfully treat even the youngest infants. To me it makes no sense to recommend this vaccine for anyone at all, ever. The disease is not dangerous in those over three or four months old (it used to be, but the pathogen itself has been attenuated to become less dangerous).

He strongly recommends giving infants the Hib and Prevnar vaccines, and says they're safe, but they really aren't. You can read the sections in Dr. Mayer Eisenstein, Neil Miller, or Dr. Randall Neustaedter on these vaccines and see how dangerous they often are, how many deaths they have caused. The Hib vaccine now causes peanut allergy in one in fifty American children (Heather Fraser, The Peanut Allergy Epidemic). No question. Yes, meningitis is its clinical form is extremely dangerous, especially for young babies. But the germs which cause it are ubiquitous in our environment and most people carry the germs for several kinds in their respiratory passages for long periods of time, without their causing disease. They are common commensals which probably serve a useful purpose. Hib meningitis was rare in the early '40s in the US, but became much more common after the DPT was introduced in 1948, so that the rate of clinical cases of Hib meningitis was four times higher in 1968 than it had been in 1941. This was probably due to the fact that vaccines cause the suppression of the immune system for some time after vaccination, allowing what would have been mild or non-existent infections when the immune system was strong to become dangerous infections when the immune system was suppressed after a vaccination. DPT vaccination was suspended during polio outbreaks for this reason, as it was so obvious that children who had gotten the DPT in the previous month were much more likely to get a dangerous, crippling case of polio. We'd have to see what happened if large numbers of people stopped getting the pertussis vaccine for their children. I believe that it would allow their immune system to develop the way it was supposed to, and there would be very few cases of any kind of meningitis, so vaccination would not be necessary. There would also be no cases of peanut allergy.

To his credit, he recommends refusing the hep-b vaccine at birth and for older babies and children, unless the mother is positive for hep-B, in which case the vaccine is necessary. I agree with that. He recommends refusing the rotavirus vaccine unless the family would have no access to medical care for rehydration in the case a baby become dangerously dehydrated. I agree with that. He recommends refusing the polio vaccine in the US at this time, since we have no polio now. Agreed. He says babies and children don't need the flu vaccine. Totally agree to that.

He says no MMR until the age of three. He says measles causes one death in every 1,000 cases, which is a low risk he's willing to live with, in the rare event of measles occurring here now. I'm surprised he doesn't seem to realize that that is a pharma dogma: that Dr. Langmuir published charts showing that in 1960 in the US, only one case in 10,000 died of measles, In the UK in the 1980s it was one or two per 10,000 cases, In Europe five years ago, three per 10,000. It has not been as high as one in a thousand in at least a hundred years in developed countries. The real risk of death from measles is very low, and lower still if the patient is kept in bed thoughout the fever, kept well-hydrated, given the appropriate two doses of vitamin A, given NO fever reducers, and kept at home for three weeks after the day the rash appears, to prevent secondary infections in the weeks before the immune system recovers its strength.

He gives the basic facts on the chickenpox vaccine and disease, hep-A, M, M, and R, and says that he has changed his recommendations over the years, but essentially lets parents decide. He does recommend the MMR at the age of three or later, which I REALLY disagree with. He saw a healthy eight year old die of chickenpox, but says that such an event is very rare. He recommends the flu shot for children with heart or lung problems or other chronic health problems, and I don't know enough about immunocompromised children to say anything, although I know that vaccines can cause reactions even more often than in typical children.

He has a good discussion of Gardasil, ending by saying that it's a case of weighing the chance of death, autoimmune disease, or thyroid dysfunction caused by the vaccine against the risk of a slow-growing, highly treatable cancer caused by the HPV virus, and says he'd recommend against the vaccine. He recommends against the meningococcal vaccine unless your teen lives near an outbreak of that type of meningitis. And I'd agree with that, although I"d probably go for the homeopathic nosode rather than the vaccine in that case.

This is a good book: Dr. Thomas is clearly very concerned about children's health and the problems caused by our massive recommended vaccine schedule. He is very well-informed on many subjects, and it's valuable to read about concrete instances of children getting severe cases of VPDs. It is understandable that a doctor who had seen children die of chickenpox or measles would have a different take on it than those whose experience has been with their usual, relatively mild course. He really doesn't talk much about tetanus, just very basic information, saying that the incidence of tetanus in American children has been close to zero for many years. And that's true, but that's because nearly everyone has received the tetanus series of vaccines, and tetanus, while the spores are present in the environment everywhere there was ever animal manure, it has always been rare. I think we'd need to see what happened if a lot of people never got the tetanus vaccine before making a definitive judgment on the value of the tetanus series.

He says that those of his thousands of patients who have followed his recommendations from birth have had zero cases of autism. And of course that's impressive. I'd like to know how many got asthma or allergies, or seizure disorders or diabetes, also usually caused by vaccine reactions. And since he recommends the very dangerous pertussis, Hib, and Prevnar vaccines, and MMR after the age of three, I think that it's just luck that his patients have not gotten autism.

Laura Hayes

• a slower, evidence-based vaccine schedule that calls for only one aluminum-containing shot at a time

Wow, from what I understand, there is NO safe amount of aluminum to ever inject into a human being, much less one whose immune and nervous systems, brain, and GI tract are developing.

And "evidence-based" vaccine schedule? The only verifiable evidence I know about is the evidence showing how damaging, sometimes-fatal, vaccines are...and that their failure rate is off the charts.

Here is Dr. Thomas' 1-min. promo for his new book:

Clearly, he has more critically-important information to learn, or he wouldn't still be injecting the dangerous, disgusting, immoral and repugnant, always-damaging ingredients in vaccines (not to mention the ones we don't know about because not all ingredients are required to be listed and disclosed, some are hidden under "trade secrets") into his patients...ingredients that have no business inside the human body...especially having missed being filtered out and hopefully cleared via the respiratory and digestive tracts. Directly injecting vaccine ingredients into the muscle tissue and vascular system is dangerous, destructive, and pure insanity.

Here is the link to Dr. Thomas' testimony in OR last year, and my reply to the person who sent the link to me:

Just because a disease is frightening or potentially fatal does not make the vaccine "for it" safe, effective, or needed. Never are our internal systems to be violated, tainted, and intoxicated in the ways that vaccinations violate, taint, toxify, and permanently alter, for the worse, for life. Never.

Of all people whose systems should not be further compromised via vaccination, it would be people in "3rd world" countries whose nutritional status and health status might very well already be compromised. Talk about a death sentence for these children, and adding insult to injury. What those children need, like children everywhere, is clean drinking water, nutritious food (and not the GMO-pesticide-chemical-laden "food" sent by U.S. "aide" missions, which again, adds insult to injury), and proper hygiene and sanitation in the areas in which they live. They do not need the poisonous and permanently health-damaging ingredients in vaccines injected into their closed systems, where they will remain, wreaking havoc over the course of these children's lifetimes, permanently ruining their immune systems.

In his testimony, he discloses that he still gives the DTaP and MMR vaccines to all his patients, "so they are not putting the immunocompromised at risk." Yet again he shows that he has not read all of the available literature. Both of these vaccines have inexcusably high failure rates, with ever-increasing "boosters" recommended, are incredibly risky, and are potentially fatal. The MMR is a live-virus vaccine, so its recipients are shedding and spreading the diseases for which they were vaccinated. We know recipients of DTaP can be harboring pertussis in their throats and spreading it, unknowingly...not to mention the vaccine has caused more virulent strains of pertussis to become more prevalent, to which the vaccinated have been proven to be even more susceptible. He ends with, "Herd immunity is there," referring to his cohort of selectively-vaccinated patients. There is no proof of that, and in actuality, there is proof of the exact opposite, as I have just written.

On top of that, it is no child's responsibility to protect another child. It is the parent's job to protect their child. How dare he or anyone else put that onus on a child, and a false and dangerous, potentially-fatal one at that...and how dare he or anyone else value one child's life above another's. Has he read Dr. Tetyana Obukhanych's testimony in CA which completely refutes the falsehood that vaccines prevent the spread of disease? He should.

Here is a question for him: How is it possible that my taking a medicine will make your medicine more effective? If vaccines work, the vaccinated should not have any worries, they should feel oh so protected. And if the immunocompromised "can't have" a vaccine (which is hardly ever the case, by the way, according to CDC guidelines), their parents would be better served to ask why their kids are immunocompromised in the first place...most likely, it is from the vaccines they allowed their children to be given. If being out in the community poses a risk for them, then their parents must keep them at home until they feel it is safe for their child to reenter places out in the community.

While it is good that he supports informed consent, it appears that he is unaware that true informed consent cannot even happen with vaccines due to all of the lies, fraud, and deception that underlies them, from manufacture to mandate, and beyond, and that the proper studies have never been done. He actually admits that he is aware of both in his testimony, mentioning the fraud committed on the CDC's MMR-Autism study, and saying, "The process is unfolding. We need the studies." Yet, he continues to vaccinate the babies and children in his practice? That is unacceptable. They are not guinea pigs, and should not be used as unwitting experimental test subjects with medical procedures that carry the serious risks of chronic illness, permanent disability, premature death, and immediate death. The only facts that can be reliably relayed at this point in time are that vaccines are dangerous, they cause grave harm, chronic illness, and permanent disability, they spread disease, they fail, they taint and derail the immune system forever, and they kill.

Vaccine injury is real. It isn't rare. The only way to stop the Vaccine Holocaust is to stop the vaccinating. Instead of endless propaganda campaigns to vaccinate, vaccinate, vaccinate, we need education campaigns regarding the tried and true, risk-free ways, to protect, maintain, and enhance health. We already have that knowledge, and we need to be spreading it widely now.

George stevens

Still waiting on that age of autism melinda gates hillary meeting when she was at the state department and how much the gates donated to the clinton foundation. Along with vaxxeds claim that trump saw vaxxed and gaurenteed to change things.

Jeannette Bishop

I just recently viewed this:

and I was thinking maybe a hardline, all-vaccines-on-the-schedule-or-you're-booted-from-my-practice physician should do the same thing for all to see.


I would love to read this book and then give to my sister-in-law who's still vaccinating my niece and nephew but using the "delayed approach".


Interested to read the risks of not vaccinating...

Kathy Lord

I applaud all doctors and health care professionals who STAND UP to voice their opinions but use medical -factual information to back up the atrocities occurring through the CDC's now-forced vaccination schedule. I will be sharing this book with everyone who is concerned about the health of their child.


This is the only plan I can see that is safe, effective and works. Just say NO!

Tricia Zarro

As a mother of a vaccine injured child with autism, I am often asked advice on vaccinating the children of friends and family. Thank you for creating a resource that I can share and that I know has the potential to save lives.

Lisa Thompson

The Vaccine-Friendly Plan by Dr. Paul would look great on my bookshelf!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)