Dachel Morning Wake Up: Response to Alberta HPV Vaccine Study
By Anne Dachel
July 7, 2016, Edmonton Alberta MetroNews: Alberta study shows HPV vaccine is 'very effective'
By Kevin Maimann
An Alberta study has proven the effectiveness of the HPV vaccination in protecting against cervical cancer, according to doctors.
Dr. Huiming Yang, who co-authored the study that was published this week in the Canadian Medical Association Journal, says it is the first in North America to demonstrate the vaccine’s effectiveness.
“It was what we hoped for, because the clinical trial data years ago basically showed similar results,” Yang said. “And now we basically have proof that this worked with a real population.”
The study tested more than 10,200 women born between 1994 and 1997 who had at least one pap test between 2012 and 2015.
It found the vaccination is “very effective” in reducing cervical cell abnormalities. Women who completed all three doses of the vaccine were 50 per cent less likely to develop hybrid lesions that have a higher potential to become cancerous later in life....
Meanwhile, anti-vaccine sentiment is still alive in Edmonton. The Princess Theatre came under fire from health professionals this week for screening anti-vaccine film Vaxxed directed by Andrew Wakefield, whose 1998 study claiming links between autism and vaccines has been thoroughly discredited.
What the Alberta MetroNews story tries to do (besides slam Andrew Wakefield for "VaxXed") is pretend that the HPV vaccine prevents cancer. Of course they can't really say that, so they allege that being "less likely to develop hybrid lesions" means that a woman won't get cervical cancer later on. This claim is directly challenged by a Duluth Minnesota physician who believes that the possible side effects outweigh the imagined benefits.
July 5, 2016, A doctor's response: Risks, costs of HPV vaccine far outweigh any benefit
By Gary G. Kohls, MD
A commentary in the June 16 News Tribune, written and endorsed by area board-certified pediatricians, oncologists and obstetricians/gynecologists, promoted the universal use of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for pre-teen and teen-age girls (A Doctor’s View: “Simple vaccine can prevent cancer’s suffering”).
The commentary appeared to be a part of a worldwide, billion-dollar promotion campaign to get the world’s young women, even in poor, Third World nations, more fully vaccinated. The huge amount of money behind the massive effort comes from one of the most profitable, price-gouging pharmaceutical companies in the world, Merck.
In 2006, after only three to five years of clinical trials, the FDA approved for marketing the most expensive vaccine in the history of the world, Gardasil, which has been proclaimed as preventative for cancer of the cervix, a claim that was never proved and which has, to date, not prevented a single case of cervical cancer.
The premise that the vaccine could prevent cancer was presented by Merck investigators to the FDA, then to American physicians, and now to their patients. The premise was based on findings made by investigators deeply conflicted by their financial involvement with Merck in that they were employees, had shares in the company or had received honoraria or grants to get the product to market and promote the vaccine any way they could.
Scandalously, the truth of the matter is that neither company’s vaccine has ever prevented a single cancer of the cervix, mainly because cancer of the cervix takes 20 to 50 years to develop, and the vaccine corporations only clinically tested the product prior to FDA approval for less than five years....
Gary G. Kohls is a retired medical doctor in Duluth.
Anne Dachel is Media Editor for Age of Autism.
http://www.naturalblaze.com/2016/07/colombia-will-hpv-vaccinations-be-suspended.html
GREAT NEWS :
Breaking News: The Attorney General’s Office appealed to the Constitutional Court asking for enforcement of a previous ruling issued by the High Court of Cali, requiring the Ministry of Health to suspend the HPV vaccination program in Colombia.
The watchdog said the Constitutional Court must rule on the matter because the side effects of the vaccine are significantly detrimental to the health of patients receiving it. He specifically referred to the court case of a minor in Cali and the complaint filed by the mother of the girl who had health side effects after the application of the vaccine.
Posted by: Hans Litten | July 11, 2016 at 01:43 PM
Gardasil \ Gardakil – a total disgrace from start to finish . A total fraud .
http://www.naturalblaze.com/2016/06/prestigious-cochrane-challenges-the-european-medicines-agency-about-hpv-vaccines-harms.html
http://anhinternational.org/2016/01/20/hpv-vaccine-safety-assurances-collapse-in-the-wake-of-cover-up-allegations/
http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/mercks-former-doctor-predicts-that-gardasil-will-become-the-greatest-medical-scandal-of-all-time/#sthash.6hZ9SLPb.dpuf
“Merck’s Former Doctor Predicts that Gardasil will Become the Greatest Medical Scandal of All Time”
Posted by: Hans Litten | July 11, 2016 at 08:12 AM
http://www.healthnutnews.com/olympic-medalist-dies-of-cervical-cancer-despite-being-vaccinated-for-hpv-years-before/
The only questions in this case are - did the vaccine cause this woman's cancer or did it fail to prevent it?
Posted by: Linda1 | July 09, 2016 at 04:38 PM
How Many Girls and Young Women have been Damaged by HPV Vaccines?
**************
Any one who has received an HPV Vaccine, has been damaged by an HPV vaccine.
In fact, if you removed HPV from the previous sentence, it would still be true.
Posted by: Barry | July 09, 2016 at 01:04 PM
Sounds like the American powers that be are looking for plausible deniability.
Seems like the Italians know better:
https://www.periscope.tv/AutismMedia/1dRKZVlgWRQKB
Posted by: annie | July 09, 2016 at 01:05 AM
The Merck goal is 12 million HPV / Help Pay for Vioxx / doses a year, 3 / $120 doses for each for the 4 million children born every year in the USA.
About 1.4 billion dollars worth...
I understand cervical cancer rates are about 1.5% mostly in women age 45 –55. (Boys do not get cervical cancer)
It will be 30+ years before we know if Gardasil has made a dent in this number.
Such elite BS.
Posted by: go Trump | July 08, 2016 at 11:09 PM
Interesting that just in the news today, the CDC is stating that HPV cases have increased from 2008-2012. So, it appears more vaccinated population = more cancer cases?
Of course, the 2004-2008 numbers may not have been collected properly, but still, you have to wonder how this is good news for the vaccine?
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/wr/mm6526a1.htm?s_cid=mm6526a1_w
And this appears to be in direct contradiction to the fact that the CDC also says that HPV rates have dropped 64% since vaccination started.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/feb/22/hpv-rates-drop-vaccination-cdc-human-papillomavirus
Intirgueing; a decrease in HPV means the vaccine is working and more people should get vaccinated , but apparently an increase in HPV rates since vaccination started also means that more people should get vaccinated?
Seems a pretty ineffective vaccine if it is potentially causing more cancer on a population basis..
But got to give it to the CDC; way to spin the news .
Posted by: Hera | July 08, 2016 at 12:12 PM
Dr. Huiming Yang, who co-authored the study that was published this week in the Canadian Medical Association Journal ... is quoted thus:
"It was what we hoped for, because the clinical trial data years ago basically showed similar results,” Yang said. “And now we basically have proof that this worked with a real population.
Duh .. if one begins with a HOPED FOR CONCLUSION .. IT IS MORE THAN LIKELY THAT "HOPED FOR CONCLUSION" WILL BE REACHED
Isn't this PRECISELY why "epidemiology (population) research" is so widely perceived to be UNRELIABLE???
Posted by: Bob Moffit | July 08, 2016 at 11:07 AM
Last night I was watching the Olympic trials with my 15 year old daughter when I saw the worst possible Gardisil commercials. In them, first a young woman talks about her cancer and how she know that if her parents knew of a way to prevent it with a simple vaccine when she was eleven, they would have done it, "right Mom?" Then it's the same commercial but with a young man. It finished, "right Mom and Dad?" It's so insidious because it made me (ME! a person who knows all about the problems with vaccines and HPV in particular) feel guilty that these two young people had cancer. The commercials ended by telling young people (okay, now they're talking directly to my daughter) to talk to their parents about preventing cancer. Pure evil.
I turned to my daughter and said something like this. "Okay, let's talk about that. So we know that that vaccine has never actually been proven to prevent cancer and it's full of dangerous ingredients, right?" She responded, "yea, like aluminum and it causes immune problems."
A few months ago, she texted me from her health class. Everyone was singing the praises of the HPV vaccine, and she was calling for backup. The class was using the CDC website to research it's safety profile. So I suggested that she uses the CDC website to research the safety of aluminum, one of the problematic ingredients.
I'm so glad that my kids know the truth (because here in CA they could get that vaccine without my knowledge or consent starting at age 12, assuming I'd ever leave them alone with a doctor, which of course I wouldn't), but what about the millions of families watching that damn commercial? Fear and guilt wrapped into one deceptive and misleading commercial.
Pharma advertising on tv must be stopped.
Posted by: Holly Riley | July 08, 2016 at 11:05 AM
http://www.healthnutnews.com/healthy-boy-dies-gardasil-injection/
“An expert hired by the family of a boy who died after his second Gardasil injection has testified that Gardasil likely caused the boy’s death. The case – Gomez versus USDOH: Petition No. 15-0160V1 – was filed by a California law firm for petitioners Adan Gomez and Raquel Ayon, on behalf of their deceased son Joel Gomez. The petition states, in part:
“Joel Gomez received a Merck Gardasil vaccine on June 19, 2013 and again on August 19, 2013, and died in his sleep the following day on August 20, 2013. The death was caused in fact by receiving the Gardasil Vaccine.
Gardasil did cause or contributed to a myocardial infarction in the decedent, and that the second dose of Gardasil finally caused a fatal hypotension in this case on the day of vaccination. There was no other plausible cause for the death of Joel Gomez. . .”
Posted by: Hans Litten | July 08, 2016 at 07:24 AM
https://healthimpactnews.com/2016/did-merck-deceive-fda-about-gardasil-vaccine-research-omitting-data-concerning-ovarian-failure/
Did Merck Deceive FDA About Gardasil Vaccine Research Omitting Data Concerning Ovarian Failure?
Merck Studies did not Examine Rat Ovaries
Merck did not Give Three Doses of HPV Vaccine to the Rats
Merck did not Look at Long-term Fertility
Merck did not Fully Examine Ovarian Function in Girls
Merck Encouraged Girls to use Birth Control Pills
Merck didn’t Properly Measure Menstrual Activity after Vaccination
Merck did not Collect Information about New Medical Conditions
Detergent in Vaccines has Serious Health Effects
Polysorbates Release a Systemic Histamine Storm in Vaccine-Injured People
Polysorbate 80 Damages Ovaries
How Many Girls and Young Women have been Damaged by HPV Vaccines?
Posted by: Hans Litten | July 08, 2016 at 06:59 AM
From above:-
"It found the vaccination is “very effective” in reducing cervical cell abnormalities. Women who completed all three doses of the vaccine were 50 per cent less likely to develop hybrid lesions that have a higher potential to become cancerous later in life.....................The study tested more than 10,200 women born between 1994 and 1997 who had at least one pap test between 2012 and 2015."
How on earth can they make these assumptions based on pap smears taken in only a 3 year window?
Also, Gardasil only targets a small % of HPV strains. In his article, Dr. Huiming Yang attempts to cover himself from future criticisms. He said regular pap tests are important for sexually active women age 25 and older.
“Even for those who are vaccinated, when age appropriate, they should continue to have regular cancer screening,” he said.
Posted by: Jenny Allan | July 08, 2016 at 06:18 AM