Justin Kanew, I was looking forward to your Seneff interview.
Still coming?

@cia parker

I found Klenner's case-study for treating polio with Vitamin C online. It appears to be effective just taken by mouth, as long as large-enough doses are used. Children were given injections, as were some adults.

He treated and cured 60 out of 60 cases (100%), which suggests that a large-scale study would find its effectiveness at somewhere between 98% and 100%.

http://www.seanet.com/~alexs/ascorbate/194x/klenner-fr-southern_med_surg-1949-v111-n7-p209.htm

David,
Re the possible connection between MMR retrovirus contamination and MMR induced disease: I am in no position to judge the merit of Dr. Mikovits' work and conclusions but do think her perspective should also be represented and discussed. I'm glad that you've shared your perspective. Would like to know more about the other side of the argument.

Dr. Judy Mikovits at 2016 Autism One Conference at 29:37 in response to the question "I'd like for Judy to explain to us how Wakefield's work and how her work and all this is connected and how all these pieces are coming together. It's very complex and I think she can do it":

Dr. Mikovits:
"Simply said, um, the, uh, retrovirus in the MMR vaccine infected the gut. It's just like HIV. It did all of that damage and it literally spread the, uh, the, the MMR viruses because it activated them and literally spread them around. Our work exactly confirmed and extended exactly what he saw and it was the retrovirus driving the disease engine."

From Youtube: "Dissecting the CDC Whistleblower Documents: A Study in Corruption - Dr. Brian Hooker" Published May 28, 2016

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5U4Qoh1-h7c

@benedetta do you have references for "full combat training causes hair line fractures over women's entire skeleton"? I'm curious...

It is hard to believe that epilepsy is now 1 out of 20 - I mean that many kids!!! We are well past the risk outweighs the benefits!

Linda,

I don't know btw how small the risk of seizures is. According to this notice - up for many months - from Seattle Children's Hospital the rate of epilepsy in children under 5 is now 1 in 20.

http://www.seattlechildrens.org/medical-conditions/brain-nervous-system-mental-conditions/epilepsy/

CIA Parker;

LOL - hope the vinegar works.

David,
Thank you for sharing your history and insight. It's interesting to note, too, that in this preemie study, many of the babies were born as early as 23-25 weeks gestation. Only in recent years have babies born that early survived. To refer to vaccinating them as "routine" implies that this is an old accepted practice. What a lie. Not only is the practice not new, but these babies are supposed to be in the womb for another 15 to 17 weeks.

Tim,
Thanks for posting the link to the study!

Cia,
One thing about DDT is that it is stored in the body and doesn't break down. I think it's stored in the fat? I hope you didn't suffer any long-term effects of that exposure in Mexico. The thing about the Indians giving "pulsed" doses of oral polio. I read that in some populations the polio vaccine wasn't working and that's why they were giving more doses. But, if the oral vaccine was working, then additional doses shouldn't hurt because the recipient would be immune (right?).

Dr. Kostoff,

"The study you reference had five authors from the CDC, the same organization that William Thompson alleged omitted critical data to show absence of a link between the MMR vaccine and autism. What would lead you to believe the present study was any more credible?"

I don't think it's more credible! My reason for posting it was to point out how lame these people are. Yes, it is the CDC saying that a vaccine that they've been promoting for adults for many decades has zero safety data and that they are just now getting around to taking a (casual, inadequate) look at the (voluntary, incomplete) VAERS database. You're right. Absolutely pathetic. Completely irresponsible. That was my point, but thank you for elaborating.

@Danchi thanks! Levi Quackenboss led me to this fascinating youtube by Forrest Maready:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5me9QZx8GvU --

well worth the few minutes to watch. Just another case study in astroturf :-)

Tim,

I've read about how vitamin C, especially high-dose IV vitamin C, can successfully treat and cure virtually any disease. I believe it, but, like with the lathyrus sativus, I am not certain that it would solve the problem. I'd like to see large-scale studies done on both of them to see if they would be at least as effective as the vaccines.

The oral polio vaccine is supposed to be more effective because it enters by the natural route. At one time they recommended getting two doses of the injected vaccine, which can't cause paralysis, and then two doses of the oral: the immunity provided by the injected one protected against the extremely rare vaccine paralysis. I don't know why they stopped doing that.

I need more information, I'd love to see large scale studies done on this, and would be extremely happy if either vitamin C or lathyrus or both were proven to be extremely effective at treating severe cases of polio.

Linda1,

"Limited data exist on the safety of the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine in adults."

That's an interesting way of phrasing the paucity of MMR safety data. For example, read the insert in the MMR vaccine package: (http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/m/mmr_ii/mmr_ii_pi.pdf). It states, in part: "M-M-R II has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or potential to impair fertility." If one were to consider using e.g. a skin cream, and it contained the above statement on its label, would anyone in their right mind use it?

Most of the safety studies referenced in the insert, which served as the basis for FDA approval, were both short term and done 4-5 decades ago. Thus, long-term effects were not ascertained, and today's co-promoter effects (e.g., vaccines combined with cell phone radiation, glyphosate, biosludge, astroturf, etc) could not be determined.

The study you reference had five authors from the CDC, the same organization that William Thompson alleged omitted critical data to show absence of a link between the MMR vaccine and autism. What would lead you to believe the present study was any more credible?

The study you reference used the VAERS database as the data source. This is a passive surveillance database. People voluntarily contact the database managers to report an adverse event. I have seen estimates that these types of databases underestimate adverse events by one or more orders of magnitude. Additionally, how representative are the events reported of all adverse events? Is there a bias in the reporting that skews the sampling? Is every event reported to the database managers entered into the database?

A very serious limitation of what gets into VAERS is making the link between the vaccination and the adverse event. The data tend to reflect short-term events. As the time between vaccination and an adverse event increases, making the connection becomes more difficult. If one received the e.g. MMR vaccine, and developed diabetes ten years later, would one report the diabetes to VAERS as an adverse event resulting from the vaccination? Doubtful!

To realize the absurdity of the tracking process and the concept behind the paper you reference, suppose the VAERS approach was used to determine adverse effects from smoking or wireless radiation. From smoking, one might see some sore throats after a few days, or perhaps some coughing after a few weeks. The cardiovascular impacts, the lung cancers and other cancers, would be below the radar screen. Too far into the future relative to the short-term vaccination-adverse event linkage observation.

So, it amazes me that this paper would even be accepted by the medical journal. Where were the reviewers; why is this considered a credible study? Why do we even talk about vaccines and safety studies in the same breath?

Tim
I will ask Levi to post the information he found and pass it along.

@Danchi

Dr. Wakefield on NICU - 30 seconds:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0CY8FhzcPg&feature=youtu.be

Benedetta,
Fascinating history. Re the colic, what was the difference in what your grandmother fed her children and what your mother fed hers? The sister with colic started out premature and with a complicated birth (preeclampsia). Could it be that because she was in the hospital that she was not handled by her mother - instead by nurses - and was not breastfed? All would make a difference in her microbiome. Not sure about the effect of prior vaccination but interesting question.

David,

I agree that most kids got polio subclinically and got permanent immunity to at least that kind (there are thought to be three strains). But for those tens of thousands who got clinical cases and were paralyzed, many for life, it was a terrible disease which the vaccine beat back. I'm reading the book Patenting the Sun now, and it's horrifying to read of polio arriving in a community, kids getting cold-like symptoms, and then suddenly collapsing on the ground, never to walk again. Usually the paralytic symptoms subsided, but not always, and if they affected the lungs, the patient would die unless put into an iron lung and cared for until his lungs recovered from their paralysis enough to breathe again. Which didn't always happen, they eventually learned that you can live for ten years inside an iron lung. I wondered what the patients did all day, especially if they were encased for years. And many thousands died of polio.

I have thought a lot about what I would do if polio came back in the US, and what I would do if I had young children if it did. I know that most people get mild or subclinical cases and recover, and that's the best possible outcome. I don't know if there's any way to predict if any individual is more or less likely to experience paralyzing symptoms. I think DDT and other pesticides/insecticides played a role, but there again, I was wondering how you could tell if you or your child had had excessive exposure to these chemicals or not. We never use chemicals in our yard: I put salt water on some poison ivy plants in our back yard last month, which killed them right away, and I ordered some pickling vinegar to put on a thistle patch (thanks, Benedetta, I got the idea from you). We don't use chemicals in the house either, just get cruelty-free, environmentally correct cleaning products. But how do I know how much we're exposed to in other places? Many of our neighbors use ChemLawn, for example.

I think using homeopathic lathyrus sativus is an effective preventive and treatment, but I've never tried it myself or seen it work.

I think I'll hold back on recommending any course of action until getting information not yet available. But if push came to shove, if I heard about any people here being crippled by polio in a new outbreak, I think I'd have blood titers done on me and my daughter to look for polio antibodies and, if none were present, I probably would get the vaccine for both of us.

Friends, Here is another aspect of the Hep B at birth issue. I think we have not touched on this. I heard a neonatologist puzzling that if the newborn human infant has a diminished immune system in the first week after birth in order to accept all the bacteria that it needs to upload from its mother, how was it a good idea to give Hep B vaccine, which revs up the immune system ? When one hears things like this, you just think, "Well, more insanity; It never ends once humans start meddling with millions of years of evolution"

Is Marco Arturo the prodigy a hoax?
https://leviquackenboss.wordpress.com/2016/06/05/is-marco-arturo-the-prodigy-a-hoax/

{Update 6-6-2016: Walgreens has revoked their sponsorship of the Marco Arturo article on A Plus after a campaign by Hear This Well and hundreds of parents of vaccine injured children.}

Cia, My initial comment cited 1942 (my premature birth), and my brothers were born 1940 & 1945. Way BEFORE the DTP shot(s). And we certainly not have any diphtheria shots like your mother, that was cancelled sometime after your mother's shot, because of its terrible toxicities.

And we certainly did not receive any polio shots during the 1940s (instituted later during the Panic of mid-1950s, because early on my brothers and I (99% sure) in our infant years easily sailed through "subclinical" or "asymptomatic" infection of the polio virus, as been done throughout history for countless generations (well cited by Sirs Olmsted and Blaxill in their books and writings, and many others).

Of course the biggest Practical Joke was the 1955/56 polio shot we did in fact receive (a very bad joke as the new vaccines CAUSED countless misery, paralysis and death to many thousands) - when in fact my siblings and I and our generation were long ago permanently immune because of actual polio infection during infancy.

All of what I've said has been well documented by so many, but it has been cast aside by our Criminal Medical Cartel epitomized by the CDC and NIH who are hellbent to stonewall and protect their Empires.

To Justin: Try to absorb this unadulterated history of health, before the vaccine onslaught.

Every treatment in medicine start out as anecdotal. The first smallpox vaccination and its success was anecdotal. Treating people with antibiotics was possible because of the accidental discovery of penicillin. The fact that it was discovered was anecdotal. The fact that it was made into a medicine was due to the fact that someone believed it.

Most medicine was not discovered because someone said I want to make a medicine. It starts with an anecdote. Medicine has never been pure science. So this idea that the pharmaceutical companies make their medicines because science comes first is not true. There are pharmacologists who scour the earth for herbs that are used in tribal medicines. Those tribes use their meds because of anecdotes.

The only reason why the anecdote that autism is caused by vaccines is not believed is because it is inconvenient. It's most inconvenient for dentists and medical doctors and pharmaceutical companies because believing that anecdote can result in big trouble.

Linda1,

THANKS for your providing the published Study re vaccinating "extreme low weight" premature babies.

I have read several other prior Studies on premature American babies, and their consequent terrible health (if they survived) while being vaccinated as if they were full term. I don't usually provide the actual PubMed references as they take such much time to digest; but you have -- thanks again.

The main point being as you so well made I agree with, and I contend, is the literal definition of indoctrinated medical-mindset insanity. To EVEN CONSIDER or CONTEMPLATE the injection of vaccines into premature babies.

AND, guess what? - these teeny little premature infants, many pounds less than full-term, are injected with the same doses that go into those full-term that get .50 milliliters of vaccine per shot, obviously including all the toxic excipients in the syringe.

These shots are going INTO 2-5 pound barely surviving preemies! AND, as recommended/directed by the U.S. CDC website! RIGHT ON THEIR CDC WEBSITE they direct medical personnel to administer all the vaccines into preemies that go into all full-term infants!!

NOTHING on Earth have I ever seen even remotely approaches such criminal medical behavior, and I've been around since 1942.

I have to point out that on the preemie study I just posted, where it says "Results Most of the 13,926 infants (91.2%) received 3 or more immunizations." The study also explains that combination vaccines were counted as 1 immunization.

"We identified a total of 13,926 infants who received a total of 48,853 immunizations..."

Vaccinations were:
"receipt of at least one immunization (diphtheria, tetanus toxoids, and acellular pertussis [DTaP]; inactivated polio virus [IPV]; hepatitis B [HepB]; Haemophilus influenzae type B [HiB]; 7-valent and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate; combination DTaP, IPV, and HepB; combination DTaP, IPV, and HiB; or combination HepB and HiB) between the ages of 53 and 110 days. This period allowed us to capture most immunizations administered at approximately 2 months (60 days) of age, the recommended age of scheduled immunizations, excluding the HepB vaccine. COMBINATION PRODUCTS WERE TREATED AS ONE IMMUNIZATION. Infants discharged during the 3-day observation window were excluded unless the discharge was due to death."

I like Laura Hayes' analogy highlighting how idiotic it is to count more than one vaccine in a syringe as one vaccine. She says something like, 'if you put 9 shots of whisky in a glass, and drink it down, did you just have one drink?'

I also saw in a published editorial to this preemie study that some NICUs prescribe Tylenol after vaccination to prevent fever. http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=2300374

We know that that is not a good idea. Tylenol is linked to autism. Great article here. This is another one that you have to read, Justin (sorry, but really, as a new parent, you do):

http://www.ageofautism.com/2015/09/tylenol-inflammation-and-autism.html

Duke University PhD recommends that children never be given acetaminophen (Tylenol) and explains why.

Justin,

You have made a significant contribution to getting the truth to the public. Really all excellent interviews. I was thinking though, as I had some trouble following who was speaking when you inserted the other voices on this last one, that transcripts of the shows would enable folks to identify the speakers. I wouldn't change the unique style of the broadcast though. It is fast paced and very effective.

To add to what David Burd wrote today, I want to share with you one of the most important articles that shows the mindset of the medical community with regard to vaccination. The entire article was online when it came out last year, but I think it may have been taken down. If anyone has the link to the whole thing, please post it:

Here is the abstract:
----------------------------------------------
"Original Investigation | August 2015

Adverse Events After Routine Immunization of Extremely Low-Birth-Weight Infants

Stephen D. DeMeo, DO1; Sudha R. Raman, PhD2; Christoph P. Hornik, MD, MPH1,2; Catherine C. Wilson, DNP, NNP-BC, FNP-BC3; Reese Clark, MD4; P. Brian Smith, MD, MPH, MHS1,2
[-] Author Affiliations
1Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
2Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
3Greenville Hospital System, Greenville, South Carolina
4Pediatrix-Obstetrix Center for Research and Education, Sunrise, Florida
JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(8):740-745. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0418.

Importance Immunization of extremely low-birth-weight (ELBW) infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is associated with adverse events, including fever and apnea or bradycardia, in the immediate postimmunization period. These adverse events present a diagnostic dilemma for physicians, leading to the potential for immunization delay and sepsis evaluations.

Objective To compare the incidence of sepsis evaluations, need for increased respiratory support, intubation, seizures, and death among immunized ELBW infants in the 3 days before and after immunization.

Design, Setting, and Participants In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, we studied 13 926 ELBW infants born at 28 weeks’ gestation or less who were discharged from January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2012, from 348 NICUs managed by the Pediatrix Medical Group.

Exposures At least one immunization between the ages of 53 and 110 days.

Main Outcomes and Measures Incidence of sepsis evaluations, need for increased respiratory support, intubation, seizures, and death.

Results Most of the 13 926 infants (91.2%) received 3 or more immunizations. The incidence of sepsis evaluations increased from 5.4 per 1000 patient-days in the preimmunization period to 19.3 per 1000 patient-days in the postimmunization period (adjusted rate ratio [ARR], 3.7; 95% CI, 3.2-4.4). The need for increased respiratory support increased from 6.6 per 1000 patient-days in the preimmunization period to 14.0 per 1000 patient-days in the postimmunization period (ARR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.9-2.5), and intubation increased from 2.0 per 1000 patient-days to 3.6 per 1000 patient-days (ARR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3-2.2). The postimmunization incidence of adverse events was similar across immunization types, including combination vaccines when compared with single-dose vaccines. Infants who were born at 23 to 24 weeks’ gestation had a higher risk of sepsis evaluation and intubation after immunization. A prior history of sepsis was associated with higher risk of sepsis evaluation after immunization.

Conclusions and Relevance All ELBW infants in the NICU had an increased incidence of sepsis evaluations and increased respiratory support and intubation after routine immunization. Our findings provide no evidence to suggest that physicians should not use combination vaccines in ELBW infants. Further studies are needed to determine whether timing or spacing of immunization administrations confers risk for the developing adverse events and whether a prior history of sepsis confers risk for an altered immune response in ELBW infants."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Just a few comments - This study was highlighted last year when a NICU nurse came forward and pointed out the harm that is being done. These neonatologists KNOW that they are harming infants and somehow they rationalize that it's ok because they're performing a "routine" procedure. It's absolute insanity. This study was on infants born so early that by the time they were 2 months old, the average age of vaccination in the study, they wouldn't be full term if they had stayed in the womb. And yet, the doctors decided that they should all be vaccinated *on time* so that they stay on schedule - the current practice (was not years ago) - knowing full well that many of these tiny fragile babies, even though stable before vaccination, would within 3 days of vaccination develop fevers, stop breathing (apnea), have episodes where their heart rate would drop abnormally low (bradycardia), they would require life saving measures, that they would need a work-up to determine if they had sepsis (blood infection). The study poses the question of whether single vaccines are tolerated better than combination vaccines and they conclude that the babies get sick and some die either way (five died within 3 days after vaccination). Instead of saying maybe we shouldn't be doing this anymore, no, the recommendation is to continue with the combination vaccines since switching to single ones won't make a difference! Oh, and they call for more research, as if they are studying mice! What really got me too, is that the article states that the parents of these 13,000+ babies did not know/were not informed that their babies were in this study "because the data lacked patient identifiers".

Here are some quotes from the body of the paper:

"Apnea and bradycardia are also commonly observed adverse events in the postimmunization period. [14] The DTaP-containing vaccines have been of particular concern because the whole-cell pertussis vaccine has been cited as causing apnea and bradycardia in 7% of preterm infants [15], and more recently, apnea and bradycardia have been observed after immunization with the acellular pertussis vaccine component[16]. Several Studies [17,18], have found an increased risk of events leading to new requirements for respiratory support, especially in ELBW infants with significant lung disease, a history of sepsis during hospitalization[17], and preimmunization apnea [18], although other studies [19,20] have found no increased incidence in cardiorespiratory events after immunization among hospitalized infants in the NICU. These studies used much smaller cohorts than the current study....Older infants with a diagnosis of chronic lung disease who were still hospitalized in the NICU at the time of immunization also had a higher incidence of adverse events. [22] Regarding the use of combination vaccines, a 2007 study [22] of the hexavalent DTaP, IPV, HiB and HepB vaccine found that apnea and/or bradycardia occurred in 11% of study infants, demonstrating slightly higher rates of adverse events compared with single-dose vaccines. More recently, a retrospective study [3] in 2008 of 64 infants who received the combination DTaP, IPV, and HiB vaccine and the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine found that 25% of study infants had clinically significant apnea and bradycardia. However, we do not have current information about the use of single-dose vs. combination vaccines in US NICUs. "
-----------------------------------------------------
Please note too that this was not the first study to conclude that babies tried to die after vaccination. They've known for years. They just keep accelerating this insanity.

These babies are not in immediate danger of contracting polio, diptheria, hepatitis, etc. that might justify their being given these life threatening injections. To the medical community that conducted this study, vaccination is a rite of passage. There is no medical justification. This is voodoo. It's child abuse. Infanticide. Infanticide has become routine pediatric practice.

And you know I have to point out that while these babies in NICU are being vaccinated with staff and respirators standing by waiting for them to stop breathing, what happens to the full term babies who get their vaccinations at pediatrician visits and then go home with their parents? Then they call what happens SIDS and then the medical community will say that what happened had nothing to do with the vaccines. It was a coincidence.

Cia brings up a great point that has a tendency to get lost in the for or against narratives : informed consent.
I have been shocked at how many parents have said their child was vaccinated for Hep B in the hospital as a newborn without the parents consent.
In one of the Vaxxed q and a's, an audience member stated that while hospitalized for a surgery, she was vaccinated without her permission. She discovered it in her medical records.
Our military were forced to take an experimental Anthrax vaccine (while accidentally exposed CDC personnel were offered a choice).
And then there is the issue of foster children vaccinated against parents wishes, and the growth of legislation that permits children to be vaccinated in schools without parents permission.
The problem seems to be growing, since there is no check and balance for this.

Not only have the pro-vaxxers thrown in the towel, the towel is nowhere to be found, they're scrambling and their lies quickly fall apart upon just viewing the movie vaxxed, even to those new to vaccine/autism coverup, and really there's nothing they can do about.

"Have the pro-vaxxers thrown in the towel? I am starting to think so!"

I agree , no-one is quite as willing to stick their necks out as they used to be .
And I have to say I think Deer is rattled . He sounded desperate and looking for a way out.

Regardless of which side you are on with the vaccine debate, you have to be stunned at the contrasting quality of the discourse coming from the two sides of late. We have the 'ant-vaxxers' presenting the explosive allegation of CDC research fraud in Vaxxed. The director, producer, and others featured in the film are also making themselves available for Q&A during the screenings, but it appears the pro-vaxxers are not taking up the challenge. Here, we also have Justin in his search for answers, seeking to maintain objectivity, and reaching out to Wakefield's arch nemesis, Deer, for interviews. And the pro-vaxxers? Well, they're countering with a 12-years-old Mexican boy, who is trolling the 'anti-vaxxers' on the Net.

Have the pro-vaxxers thrown in the towel? I am starting to think so!

Justin .. Mary and Lou are well qualified .. both by personal experience as well as self-informed .. to contribute critical information to your own .. as a first time dad .. "search for truth" .. regarding whether or not to vaccinate your now five week old daughter .. as recommended and approved by public health bureaucracies.

There are TWO major reasons why the questions of "vaccine safety" remain so controversial.

The first reason is official .. public health .. bureaucratic SOPHISTRY .. described by Webster's as: "a clever and plausible .. but .. FALLACIOUS ARGUMENT'.

In this interview .. you recognized "semantics" and some "strange lines in the sands" .. such as .. supposed "experts" claiming there was "brain damage but NOT autism .. though all the symptoms of autism are present .. and .. these supposed "experts" know the very definition of autism depends solely upon "symptoms".

THAT IS SOPHISTRY .. A CLEVER AND PLAUSIBLE .. BUT FALLACIOUS ARGUMENT.

The second reason is official .. public health bureaucratic "SOUNDS LIKE SCIENCE" .. presented instead as "SOUND SCIENCE".

In this interview .. Mary, Lou, Barbara Loe Fischer, Sharyl Attkisson, Bernardine Healy .. raised serious question the scientific validity of the numerous epidemiological (population) studies that provide public health bureaucrats and their minions to piously claim the "science is in .. there is no link between vaccines and autism".

The REASON why the link between vaccines and autism continues to FESTER and GROW .. is because .. as Dr. Healy and MANY other simillarly qualified scientists argue .. "the SCIENCE that should have been done decades ago .. continues to remain .. deliberately .. UNDONE.

No better example than that is the absolute REFUSAL to conduct a scientific, independent study of vaccinated v. un-vaccinated populations .. to ascertain once and for all .. if BOTH populations have suffered the same .. inexplicable rise in chronic-autoimmune disorders .. that were far less common in all previous .. LESS VACCINATED GENERATIONS. (Common sense that!)

Justin my friend, you should be aware of "SOPHISTRY" and what "SOUNDS LIKE SCIENCE" .. being argued by those who so viciously attack anyone who dares question the "safety of vaccines".

After all .. why the hell are these people so determined to prevent the SCIENCE Dr. Healy believes should have been done .. or .. the vaccinated v. unvaccinated study .. UNLESS they are TERRIFIED OF WHAT THAT COMMON SENSE SCIENCE WILL PROVE???

Justin--Another clear cut case of the Vaccine Court handing down an award for vaccine-induced autism is that of Bailey Banks. The government removed the pdf of his case that was found here:

http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/Abell.BANKS.02-0738V.pdf (see footnote 4)

I created a meme that quotes directly from the case here: http://www.peakwriting.com/stop-bailey_banks.jpg

PDD-NOS is in the center of the autism spectrum and is/was my son's diagnosis.

Thanks for your continued work.

Justin,

Again, good interview, albeit utterly contrasting in viewpoint to the one previous. Lou and Mary were very succinct in highlighting many of the crucial points, and, as opposed to Deer, employed no such techniques of obfuscation, since such methods are self-defeating if one desires nothing but to be understood.

http://healthimpactnews.com/2016/resistance-to-vaccine-medical-tyranny-growing-in-the-u-s-as-vaxxed-film-gains-wider-audience/

Smiling so Much - WATCH THIS - this makes me happy . I've been waiting for this (I'm white) .

GET OFF THE BUS (like Rosa Parks) _ NO MORE OF THIS HOLOCAUST

RISE UP against the "CDC reich" .