BEWARE of “Standard of Care”
Autism and Cancer? Light It Up... Blue.

Mainstream Media's Concerted Backlash Against VaXxed

Head handsBy Anne Dachel

Where is the name William Thompson in news reports on Tribeca and De Niro?

There is something is truly frightening here.

Consider that the controversial film "Vaxxed" is about a whistleblower, Dr. William Thompson, who works at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and who says that his agency knows there's a link between vaccines and autism. He has revealed that he himself was ordered to destroy data that showed this link, but his conscience has not allowed him to go along with the cover-up. In 2014 he shared this information with Dr. Brian Hooker, a biologist and father of an autistic child. Thompson is even willing to tell Congress about the corruption going on at the CDC, and he is certainly a credible expert. Who better to talk about how the science is rigged than an agency insider?

Congress is aware of the charge of fraud since US Rep Bill Posey (FL) took to the House floor and pleaded with members of Congress to do something back in October, 2015, but our legislators seem to be overwhelmingly not interested in hearing what Thompson has to say.

Posey: "Considering the nature of the whistleblower’s documents, as well as the involvement of the CDC, a hearing and a thorough investigation is warranted. So I ask Mr. Speaker, I beg, I implore my colleagues on the Appropriations committees to please, please take such action,"

This is the background of the documentary "Vaxxed," but you'd never know it from the way the media reported on how the movie was pulled from the Tribeca Film Festival.

What should have been an unfolding high level scandal involving the top health care agency in the US, has been turned into yet another egregious attack on the doctor who first made the claim of a link back in 1998. In the recent press coverage the most talked about person was Andrew Wakefield, not William Thompson. Instead of quoting anything that was said in the film, reporters cited doctors telling us once again that "studies show no link," seemingly aware that the movie calls all the official research from the CDC into question.

In CNN’s coverage of “Vaxxed,” they quoted the CDC endorsing their vaccines. ‘Vaccinations will prevent more than 21 million hospitalizations and 732,000 deaths among children born in the last 20 years,’ and omitted anything about the charges made against the agency.

I can't believe members of the press are this incompetent. Doesn’t anyone at any of the newspapers or networks covering this wonder why the emphatic denials by doctors and health officials have done nothing to end the most heated controversy in pediatric medicine?

I firmly believe that when it comes to vaccines as the cause of autism, or anything about the safety of the schedule, reporters are told what to write. Within hours of the first announcement by Robert De Niro back in March that Tribeca would show "Vaxxed," dozens of news sites attacked the film as "anti-vaccine," despite the fact that no reporter had seen the movie. In fact, news reports told the public NOT to see “Vaxxed.”

Actually the whole thing about “Vaxxed” and Tribeca should have been a minor event in the news, but it suddenly became a major breaking news story.  

First was the announcement that Robert De Niro, co-founder of Tribeca, would show “Vaxxed” at the Tribeca Film Festival. That was followed shortly by the news that “Vaxxed” had been cancelled. Over the next week the stories were non-stop in their mass condemnation of the film as “anti-vaccine.”

Considering what “Vaxxed” is actually about, headlines should have looked like this: "Tribeca film charges cover-up of CDC vaccine study" and "Documentary reveals CDC whistleblower."

Newspapers and TV networks should have descended on the CDC headquarters in Atlanta to talk to the major players. If William Thompson wasn’t willing to answer questions, they should have sought out Frank Destefano, Coleen Boyle, Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp, and Tanya Karapurkar Bhasin, whose names were also on that 2004 study. They should have gone to the head of the CDC, Dr. Thomas Frieden, to ask him why parents should trust the safety claims of officials in the face of charges of a huge cover-up that’s gone on since the first findings in 2001.

Reporters should have lined up for blocks when “Vaxxed” premiered at Angelika in New York. They should have sought out Brian Hooker, Andrew Wakefield, and Del Bigtree, the people responsible for “Vaxxed” for interviews. And since the 2004 MMR study specifically revealed a high risk for autism in African American boys who received the MMR vaccine before the age of 36 months, news people should have talked to leaders in the black community to get their reaction.

These things didn’t happen.

Instead the media buried the real story of "Vaxxed." The film somehow became the story of a discredited doctor from Britain, Andrew Wakefield. Articles talked about his Lancet article in 1998 linking the MMR to autism and bowel disease, and how he had lost his medical license. Coverage was about measles outbreaks caused by non-vaccinating parents who believe there is a link to autism. They interviewed doctors who denied that autism could result from vaccination.

Because most of the public would not see “Vaxxed” for themselves and because many people don’t look beyond the headlines of a story, it was important that news reports on “Vaxxed” label it anti-vaccine from the start. Simultaneously major news outlets in the US and abroad attacked this film "anti-vaccine" in the headline, and they universally refused to tell the public what it was really about. The issue of vaccine safety instantly became opposition to vaccination. It could hardly be coincidence that all the print and broadcast news outlets were talking about this story in exactly the same way. It really began to look suspicious when even Teen Vogue and Glamour covered this story calling the film “anti-vaccine.”

April 14, UK Daily Mail: Robert De Niro pictured socializing with celebrity anti-vaccination squad Jim Carrey, Robert F Kennedy Jr, and activist film maker amid controversy over movie linking MMR to autism at Tribeca Film Festival 

April 13, LA Weekly: Anti-Vaccination Doc Vaxxed, Booted From Tribeca, Is a Tragic Fraud

April 13, De Niro is out of his depth on anti-vaxxer film: “Let’s find out the truth” suggests the vaccine-autism link hasn’t already been debunked

April 13, Sacramento Sun Times: De Niro regrets pulling anti-vaccine documentary from Tribeca Film Fest

April 13, New York Daily News: SEE IT: Robert De Niro defends anti-vaccine documentary on ‘Today’

April 13, TIME Magazine: Robert De Niro Defends Anti-Vaccine Doc: ‘There’s More to This Than Meets the Eye’

April 13, Daily Beast: Robert De Niro Sticks Up for Anti-Vaxx Documentary

April 13, Entertainment Weekly: Robert De Niro defends support for anti-vaccination doc

April 13, Rolling Stone: Watch Robert De Niro Talk Pulling Anti-Vaccine Film From Tribeca

April 5, Anti-vax quackery sees light despite De Niro snub

April 3, Wall Street Journal: Anti-Vaccination Lunacy Won't Stop

April 1, New York Times: Anti-Vaccine Film, Pulled From Tribeca Film Festival, Draws Crowd at Showing

March 30, Irish Times: Robert De Niro withdraws anti-vaccination film from Tribeca

March 30, New York Times: Pulled From Festival, Anti-Vaccination Film Will Run in Theater

March 30, People Magazine: Controversy Still Swirls Around Anti-Vaccine Documentary After Robert De Niro Pulls It from Tribeca Film Festival

Mach 29, UK Guardian: How the scientific community united against Tribeca's anti-vaccination film

March 29, New York Post: Tribeca nixes anti-vax doc, but damage is already done

March 29, CBC (Canada): Robert De Niro pulls anti-vax doc from Tribeca Film Festival

March 28, People Magazine: Robert De Niro Pulls Controversial Anti-Vaccine Documentary from Tribeca Film Festival

March 28, New York Post: Robert De Niro was right to say no to anti-vaccine hysteria

March 28, PennLive: Robert De Niro, whose child has autism, changes mind about anti-vaccine film

March 28, ABC News: Rejected Tribeca Documentary Recalls Debunked Study that Helped Spark Anti-Vaccine Movement

March 28, Fox News: De Niro axes anti-vaccination film from Tribeca after scrutiny

March  28, Christian Post: Controversial Anti-Vaccination Documentary Pulled out From Tribeca Film Festival

March 27, Slate: The Tribeca Film Festival Pulls Anti-Vax “Documentary”

March 27, Entertainment Weekly: Tribeca pulls anti-vaccination doc Vaxxed from schedule

March 27, Newsweek: Robert De Niro pulls 'Vaxxed' anti-vaccine documentary from Tribeca Film Festival lineup

March 27, UPI: Robert De Niro says anti-vaccination documentary has been pulled from Tribeca slate

March 27, Washington Post: Robert De Niro accused of censorship after yanking anti-vaccine movie from film festival

March 27, Rolling Stone: Robert De Niro, Tribeca Film Fest Pull Anti-Vaxxer Documentary

March 27, CNN: Robert De Niro pulls anti-vaccine film from Tribeca after controversy

March 27, NewsMax: De Niro Pulls Anti-Vaccination Doc From Tribeca Film Festival

March 27, TIME Magazine: Robert De Niro Pulls Controversial Anti-Vaccine Film From Tribeca Film Festival

March 26, People Magazine: Robert De Niro Reveals He Pushed For Screening of Anti-Vaccine Movie at Tribeca Film Festival

March 26, Los Angeles Times: Robert De Niro reverses course, yanks anti-vaccine film from Tribeca lineup

March 26, Newsday: Robert De Niro pulls 'Vaxxed' anti-vaccine documentary from Tribeca Film Festival lineup

March 26, CNN Money: De Niro won't show anti-vaccine movie at Tribeca Film Festival

March 26, CBS News: Anti-vaccination film pulled from Tribeca Film Festival

March 26, New York Daily News: Robert De Niro pulls controversial anti-vaccination documentary 'Vaxxed' from Tribeca Film Festival

March 26, New York Daily News: Robert De Niro should take heat for giving Tribeca Film Festival platform to anti-vaccination documentary by snake-oil peddler Andrew Wakefield

March 26, New York Times: Robert De Niro Pulls Anti-Vaccine Documentary From Tribeca Film Festival

March 26, CBS New York: De Niro's Tribeca Festival Pulls Anti-Vaccination Film

March 26, NBC New York: De Niro's Tribeca Festival Pulls Anti-Vaccination Film

March 25, NBC New York: Robert De Niro Backs Choice of Controversial Anti-Vaccine Documentary 'Vaxxed' at Tribeca Film Festival

March 25, Daily Beast: The Tribeca Film Festival’s Dangerous Anti-Vax Documentary

March 25, Los Angeles Times: How Robert De Niro's Tribeca Film Festival sold out to anti-vaccine crackpots

March 25, CBS News: Tribeca Film Festival under fire for anti-vaccine documentary

March 25, New York Times: Robert De Niro Defends Screening of Anti-Vaccine Film at Tribeca Festival

March 25, USA Today: De Niro defends showing anti-vaccination doc

March 25, New York Daily News: Robert De Niro defends showing anti-vaccination documentary 'Vaxxed' at Tribeca Film Festival amid backlash

March 25, UK Daily Mail: Robert De Niro defends anti-vaccination documentary screening at Tribeca Film Festival

March 25, Entertainment Tonight: Robert De Niro Defends Screening of Anti-Vaccination Movie at Tribeca Film Festival

March 25, Glamour: Tribeca Film Festival Will Screen Highly Questionable Anti-Vaccine Film

March 25, Daily Beast: The Tribeca Film Festivals Dangerous Anti-Vax Documentary

March 25, Teen Vogue: Tribeca Film Festival Anti-Vaccine Documentary

Something is very wrong when the press so willingly shuts its collective eyes to the worst charge of medical corruption and fraud in our history.

If the members of the press can be so completely controlled when it comes to reporting on such a critical topic like the safety of a product mandated for every child in the country, what else are they being told to cover up? Can we really trust ANYTHING they tell us? Just as pharmaceutical advertising dollars can influence what we're told about vaccine safety, what other corporations are dictating the spin in the news?

Almost no coverage presented the real story of “Vaxxed,” instead those that mentioned it at all, did it like this:

Fox News:  “According to the Los Angeles Times, the movie alleges that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has covered up the notion that measles, mumps and rubella vaccines increase the risk of autism.”

Vogue: “Vaxxed is directed by Andrew Wakefield, the doctor who authored a discredited 1998 study linking the MMR (measles, mumps, and rubella) vaccine in children to autism. The Centers for Disease Control has long refuted any link between vaccines and autism, but the debate among parents and the medical community has escalated in recent years.”

People Magazine:  “The film claims MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccines are linked to cases of autism, which was a theory presented by gastroenterologist and medical researcher Andrew Wakefield. The notion has since been widely discredited and retracted from the journal it was published in.”

New York Post: “The documentary links vaccines to autism in children; its director is ex-doctor Andrew Wakefield, who launched the whole hysterical movement with a bogus 1998 study.”

ABC News: “The movie reportedly includes interviews with doctors, politicians and parents, and reveals ‘an alarming deception that has contributed to the skyrocketing increase of autism,’ according to the film website.”

Education Week: “The Tribeca Film Festival in New York City has pulled from its schedule this month a controversial documentary asserting a causal link between childhood vaccines and autism.”

Wall Street Journal: “If ‘Vaxxed’ had been submitted as science fiction, it would merit attention for its story line, character development and dialogue. But as a documentary it misrepresents what science knows about autism, undermines public confidence in the safety and efficacy of vaccines, and attacks the integrity of legitimate scientists and public-health officials.”

One has to ask who really controls what we are told in the news.

Anne Dachel is Media Editor for Age of Autism.


Catherine Nichols Pogorzelski

Please, I beg of all parents and caregivers, DO NOT additionally burden your already suffering children with any MRI's with Gadolinium. Tese imaging tsts are often orered to diagnose neurmological as well as other symtpoms suffered with by those with an Autism Diagnosis. Gadolinium is building up within the body in those with NO KNOW KIDNEY DISEASE and causing major medical issues such as Fibrosis/scarring, in not only dermal surfaces, but other internal surfaces, as well. It is also causing pain and suffering etc (see link
Doctors will tell you that this ONLY happens in those with KIdney Disease and this is NOT TRUE, see the link above.
here are some more links to more info:


Read the attached links and contact me if you test Postiive!!!

We have to hold GE & BAYER accountable for this atrocity!

(I have now had a third round of testing done in May 2016 and I am STILL testing HIGH POSITIVE for the presence of Gadolinium in my urine, with SOME in blood!
I have been able to get lab testing done *^*twice, it was POSITIVE and have had 9 dermal biopsies performed SO FAR, from various places around the USA.
I will talk to ANYONE privately about results, if you so choose to contact me on FaceBook
under: Catherine Nichols Pogorzelski

Page upon which "G" catalog tests appear:

Gadolinium, 24 Hour, Urine
Gadolinium, Dermal, Tissue*
Gadolinium, Random, Urine
Gadolinium, Serum
Gadolinium/Creatinine Ratio, Random, Urine
Gadolinium, Dermal, Tissue, will need to be done if and when I test POSITIVE for GADOLINIUM In blood and/or urine.


If you are REFUSING to order any lab studies, I would like to request that you sign a copy of this letter and place it in my medical chart. You will also receive a copy of this letter via registered mail.
Mayo Medical Laboratories: Reference Laboratory services for hospitals worldwide

We aren't doctors but have been to so many in pursuit of our own diagnoses that we have collected this info and made it available for the public. Please share this info with those people whoyou have known to be sick, the more the merrier! (NOT! really we are too sick to celebrate something like this, but want to help others who are in pretty much the same boat! it is nothing to celebrate! We can do chelation whether via IV or oral but once the damage starts being noticed, it will continue unelss we halt ALL MRI contrast, plus it is in our water supply, because the water comanies are NOT filtering it out!!! THEY KNOW IT’S THERE, please check links below too they are also available at the GAD TOX site!)


If you have had your child testing with imagin gin an MRI machine and they have some odd rashes, hardening of the skin or their condition has worsened and theya re exhibiting some rather peculiar bevior that oyu had not seen until now, I beg you to have them tested! DON'T LET THEM REFUSE YOU!

Now that this is showing up in us around the world, I wonder how much of the vaccines MIGHT STILL BE IN US/THEM?! ( I am victim to three vaccines as well myself and I am a 57 yr old woman and disabled! Rubella postpartum, Tetanus I have not stopped spasming with hemifacial spasm of face and Pneumovax, where I had never had penumonia as on e fo seven kids in teh 1960's and NOW I get pneumonia 10+ times, three tiems wtihin one year I was hospitalzed and I even had pneumonia when I had thryoid cancer and Left STyloid bone removed , seen in pre-op testing of chest X-ray, I was STILL operated upon and probably should NOT have been.

PLEASE check your kids' records and let me know if any test POSITIVE for the presence of Gadolinium or are exhibiting unusual symtpoms, IT doesnt MEAN they had NSF or non-nsf as we are calling it, but at elast it is an area you NEED to look into to get HELP for your kids, they deserve the BEST!!


Dr. Kostoff,



Andrew Wakefield is always blamed for causing the "vaccination scare," but vaccines were suspected by alert parents before Andrew Wakefield exploded onto the scene. Consider the following quote from "Genetic influences and autism" by Michael Rutter, a hero of the pro-vaccine extremists. Rutter's article was published in 1997 while the Lancet paper was only published the following year:

"....Families will want to know whether the risks [of autism] in their particular family are greater or less than the overall average. That question rarely has an easy answer. It seems reasonable to suppose that the risks may be lower if the autism is associated with some definite nongenetic cause, but that inference is not straightforward. In the unusual circumstance that such a definite cause can be identified (as with congenital rubella or early encephalitis), a lower risk can reasonably be assumed. More commonly, however, the story is one of obstetric complications, or an onset following immunization or some unknown fever...." [Emphasis added]


Weekend update UK. Got home from shopping and a friend had posted the Daily Mail through door with note, see pages 38 and 39. Two page spread entitled 'Why De Niro is backing the MMR doctor hounded out of Britain'. It is a generally honest piece of reporting and the second to last para 'Or might it provide the 'smoking gun' proving Western governments and pharmaceutical giants are hiding the truth about vaccine safety?' Best mainstream media I've read for years. Hopeful that cards may be toppling.

Mainstream media sucks

Bill meet Judith: controlling media and Aussie news blackout and vaccine mandate extremism. I think Rupert Murdoch is Australian isn't he?

Ronald Kostoff

Tim Lundeen,

"there is a lot of expertise in this group!"

Agreed. AoA is not monolithic. There is useful advice on preventing and treating autism, as well as improved care-giving. But, this is overwhelmed with voluminous posts and comments on how the deck is stacked against potentially removing one of the potential contributing factors, vaccines. We know that it's stacked! There's no virtue in redundancy; the real challenge is to develop AND IMPLEMENT a strategic plan for removing ALL vaccine mandates until safety has been shown by credible science. I'm not seeing such a plan; maybe the opposition is so entrenched that removing the mandates is no longer possible.

Shelley Tzorfas

Instead of reviews of the movie "Vaxxed" we are getting Prefabricated "Cut Copy Paste" explanations. This is not just a vaccine causing illness factor due to the Aluminum, thimerosal, formaldehyde, deadly peanut products, cells of Pigs, cows, dogs, ether and more, but an array of writers and journalists who no longer investigate newsworthy events or conditions. We are churning out non thinkers in our schools. This has become the platform in our gates "Common Core" program. Notice how "Common" the writing on the wall is? Science and journalism without conscience.

Tim Lundeen

@ronald kostoff re "endless do-loop".

I follow this site regularly, and get a lot of value from it:

(1) I share the best info on my facebook page and in relevant groups, to help increase awareness, and generate shares that further spread the news

(2) there is a lot of expertise in this group! I'm constantly learning, and it helps shape my models and the help I can give towards ending the vaccine disaster

(3) it is encouraging not to feel alone, to see that other people are also doing what they can to increase awareness and help our kids

Citizen Scientist Xileen

Astroturf: It looks like the real thing but - it ain't!

See how news is manufactured from an insider:

Learn more about how drug companies operate from an insider:


As a medicial doctor and academic, I find it shocking that the media have effectively stopped doctors from doing research which could link vaccines with autism. This together with journals who do not want to upset their sponsors basically stops us from looking into this issue in a normal logical manner.

One of my aunts knows the Wakefield family and so she tells me how they have been victimised and harrassed and followed and phone tapped for years! Few doctors can come into the open about this now as they do not want their lives to be invaded and runined like this.

I have a child who was vaccinated many years ago and developed what I now know as signs of autism after his MMR vaccine-not the next day but he started to become unwell immediately following his jab when he was one. When he was about 4 no-one could understand him except myself and my family.

It took me years to work out how to fix him (as you will not find the answer in a pharmaceutical pill) but now he can speak 5 languages, including chinese, fluently and is having a whale of a time at University! No-one would ever guess he ever had a problem.

However for future doctors to address the issues of finding ways forwards, they need to be able to identify what causes the problems. They also need to be protected from persecution. As this will never be allowed to happen while the financial stakes are so high, people need to look for the answers themselves as the answer is out there.

Ronald Kostoff

One more group I overlooked in the previous email. The Pediatricians and Immunologists who continue to dispense these vaccines that have not been fully tested for safety, even though many of them know better. Maintaining their careers and not offending the pharmaceutical companies and their government handmaidens take precedence over the health of at-risk children. Check!

Ronald Kostoff


In reading this blog, I feel like I'm being caught in an endless do-loop. The posters and commenters keep re-hashing the same issues ad infinitum. Unfortunately, as time proceeds, the situation only gets worse.

The pharmaceutical companies are pushing vaccines because they are profitable, even though the appropriate safety tests have not been done. Check!

The politicians are completely in the pocket of the 'healthcare' industry, as evidenced by their passage of a vaccine liability waver Act. They will do nothing to investigate and correct the situation, and in fact are doing their best to exacerbate the situation. Check!

The Federal agencies that research and regulate the vaccines do the bidding of the pharmaceutical companies, and their handmaiden politicians, and cannot be trusted. Check!

The mainstream media, and much of the alternative media, have sold out completely to the industry advertisers, and to the government protectors, and essentially lie about the adverse effects of vaccines (and many other toxic stimuli). Check!

The research institutions and performers, for the most part, will produce whatever results are necessary to satisfy their industry and government sponsors, and keep the grants coming in. Check!

Many of the biomedical journals will allow 'manufactured' research to be published, and will suppress research unfavorable to industry and government, in order to please their benefactors. Check!

We know that already. Repeating it hundreds of times more doesn't change the situation. At what point does this knowledge translate into a strategic plan for reversing the situation? I have yet to see one on these pages!!!


In Australia no media reported on VAXXED. The reason? They knew publicity would cause the public to want to see it. The total media blackout in Australia has been very clever. However as most people now visit other sites than mainstream media, it is surprising how many know about it anyway. We need a film like this to start a conversation because we have just been forced to participate in the most draconian vaccine schedule for our children. No vaccine no government benefits.


There are only *6* mega-corporations, which control well over 95% of all American - and MOST Global - "news".... Do the math.... Hello, MEDICAL FASCISM!..........

Jeremy Bowers

I have many friends in south east asia who have never received a single vaccine, and guess how sick these people are...never seen so much health and beauty crammed into on small space before. I actually quite blown away by the fact that the kids are rarely sick if ever, and you can't go down a street corner here in the us without seeing a sickly ill child walking around.

barbaraj pharm connections abound


Dorit Reiss ‏@doritmi Apr 15 San Francisco, CA
@crispybunny3 @JayGordonMDFAAP @DrPaulOffit every study generates spurious results, and not all are included, ever.

Let's grab the thesaurus , "fraudulent, faked, bogus" this the science agreed upon ? This isn't science, this is consensus for "what stays?what goes? dependent on who "bought" the studies .

Jeannette Bishop

Can't have any reporting that might shine a stray ray of light on the wall of silence these outlets put up around Dr. Thompson's release of data as well as the whole history of what could be the biggest man made, media facilitated, medical disaster of all time.

Not belonging in the above list is Thom Hartmann...

"Robert DeNiro, 'Everyone Should See Vaxxed'"

"Callers Talk About 'VAXXED: From Cover-up to Catastrophe'" including Hartmann's personal experience...CDC is coming out with another publication on the 2001 MMR data...

and I really want to thank him for putting Del Bigtree's response to this topic into a separate video:

"Misrepresentations of Dr. Wakefield's Bowel Disease-Autism Paper"


To this day it still blows my mind that during last year's Disneyland media mania measles outbreak not ONE media outlet reports that the one and ONLY measles vaccine in the US is currently under litigation.

It is no longer possible to refer to what we hear and read from
"news" outlets in the US as journalism. It is all just purely propaganda.


Mustn't question the despots.

Bob Moffit

"One has to ask who really controls what we are told in the news

I think it worth knowing that a clear majority of the people no longer trust .. "WHATEVER they are being told in the news" .. for good reasons. Consider:

Gallup Poll in 2015:

"Four in 10 Americans say they have "a great deal" or "a fair amount" of trust and confidence in the mass media to report the news fully, accurately and fairly. This ties the historical lows on this measure set in 2014 and 2012. Prior to 2004, slight majorities of Americans said they trusted the mass media, such as newspapers, TV and radio."

I saw a recent poll that said the media is ever lower on the public's scale of "trust" than politicians. How low can they go from there?

However .. looking on the bright side .. the recent Trump phenomena .. is as close to a "grass-roots movement" as I have seen in my 76 years .. having already confounded the established political opinion "experts" .. who predicted every week .. for months on end .. that his candidacy would fail quickly. Which suggests ....




One has to ask who really controls what we are told in the news.


There's not a person in this weld who ever vaccinated a children, because a review of the science convinced them that vaccines were safe and effective.

John Stone

It is just like the sheep bleating "Four legs good, two legs bad!" in Orwell's Animal Farm. The sheep, of course, were not educated. These people know that they have abandonned every ethical principle, apart from abandoning the very purpose of their trade. Nothing suits the government-industial complex better than "herd" mentality. But at least vetinarians know about the concept of over-vaccination.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)