Thanks for trying Linda1, but these links don't work either. I am assuming Tribeca does not want comments from countries which will not be showing the film. Hopefully, my comments and other favourable ones posted here will be noted by potential Vaxxed filmgoers.

Most of the Wakefield slanders and bile are about matters which happened in the UK 18 years ago, and imaginatively 'embroidered' by Brian Deer in his subsequent Times and BMJ articles.

Yes, Dr Wakefield DID lose his licence to practice medicine in the UK, following a 3 year ridiculous £8million 'Kangaroo Court', which also 'struck off' distinguished clinician Professor John Walker-Smith. In February 2012, It took Lord Justice Mitting less than 4 DAYS in the High Court to quosh the GMC charges and restore the Prof's medical licence, with some scathing comments by the Judge, about the GMC's 'superficial and inadequate' examining of the mostly Brian Deer supplied evidence against the 3 doctors. Lord Mitting also stated much of this 'evidence' was just plain WRONG! Dr Wakefield faced more than 75% of the same charges at the SAME hearing.If Prof W-S is innocent, so is Dr Wakefield, and clinician colleague Professor Simon Murch, also found 'guilty' but permitted to keep his licence to practice.

There were glaring 'conflicts of interest' on the GMC inquisition panel, and the expert witnesses. One held shares in MMR manufacturers GSK, another had testified as an expert witness for vaccine manufacturers in US vaccine damage litigation cases, with air fares, luxury accommodation and fat fees. This was NOT declared, yet the panel had the nerve to accuse Dr Wakefield of 'dishonesty' for not declaring his own expert reports on some of the 1500 or so MMR allegedly vaccine damaged children, attempting to get justice via UK litigation. Their legal aid was pulled on the orders of another Judge, also strongly conflicted. The fact was - Dr Wakefield was never asked by the panel. It was THEIR job to inquire about COEs - They DIDN'T. Dr Wakefield was not dishonest.

Let's be QUITE clear on this:-
There was NO Fraud.
The 1998 Wakefield et al Lancet paper was effectively vindicated during Professor Walker-Smith's High Court appeal.
The two clinicians dragged before the GMC were simply doing their jobs, diagnosing bowel problems, and treating those affected children at the London, Royal Free Hospital. My autistic grandson (NOT a Lancet case), benefited greatly from their treatment and care. Along with almost ALL the other families of children so diagnosed and treated, we are very grateful to Clinical Lead, Professor Walker-Smith and his excellent team.

Dr Wakefield, it should be stated here, had a PURELY RESEARCH position at the Royal Free, precluded by contract from any clinical contact with the child patients. Technically, Dr Wakefield, should not have been dragged before the GMC at all. There is another organisation in the UK which deals with alleged research fraud.

Jenny,
See if this page works for you:
https://tribecafilm.com/contact

Here is the comment section from Tribeca- I count the comments as 99-1 positive with about 1400 comments in. I am counting the trolls who post and repost as one negative comment per troll, not one hundred negative comments by the same troll as posted.

https://tribecafilm.com/filmguide/vaxxed-from-coverup-to-catastrophe-2016

Hoping Tribeca stands firm-

What comes next are lawsuits. Melinda Wharton, Frank DeStefano, Colleen Boyle- you will have to explain why your co-author is now publicly claiming that you three deliberately omitted statistically significant information showing that African American males receiving MMR vaccine before three months of age are at increased risk of autism.

Jeannette Bishop:

LOL Put the top paragraph on the bottom and maybe they will never get it, eyes will cross, and they push the accept button.

Good one.

"Respectful Insolence" is a "science blog?" I've been hoping it mostly functioned as a bedside manner improvement blog via venting (away from the bedside hopefully).

Pretty interesting "parent blog" (I think) post about vaccine education (linked from NVIC):

http://www.dinnerforthought.com/blog/these-nurses-are-silently-speaking-out-against-vaccines-find-out-why

Who are the "experts" on vaccine risks? Seemingly not most of the people who push them and/or inject them.

I left this comment in response to a question about what Cover-Up meant: Cover-Up refers to the CDC scientist, Dr Thompson, who led the CDC study that claimed the MMR vaccine did not cause autism, who has now confessed that the CDC rigged the study and the study did show the MMR caused autism. I wish people would do a little research before making such harsh statements about the movie or Andrew Wakefield. You should also know that this scientist has apologized to Wakefield for publishing this fraudulent study that was used to make Wakefield’s study appear fraudulent and for injuring all the children who were vaccinated and are now autistic due the CDC publishing a study that said the MMR did not cause autism. This scientist realizes how many children have been harmed and is very ashamed of his part in publishing that study. Thompson said specifically: “I have great shame now when I meet families with kids with autism because I have been part of the problem.”

I hope he (Dr.Wakefield) know how much we parents all love and appreciate him & his courage.

I know that Wakefield welcomes questions so I do hope the panel discussion is videoed so it can be shared with a wider group.

I have entirely lost all respect for Jezebel.Thanks for this article.
Also, I was just reading a review in the New York Times Book Review this morning about two books on eugenics, and how the respected members of the government and society lined up in enthusiastic support of it. The review states that research indicates the driving force came from progressives in academia who had "extravagant faith in science and the state with an outsized confidence in their own expertise." Wow, that's sounds familiar. Of course that is now viewed as one of science and laws most pathetic disasters.

Actually, having read the Jezebel article by Anna Merlan, I thought it was very carefully worded in order to avoid any potential Wakefield Lawsuit. Yes there was plenty of innuendo, but this was innocuous stuff compared to the slanderous Deer articles.

I expect all the bile and profanity was contained within the 254 comments. I'm not sure about US laws on profane or slanderous comments, but in the UK these are actionable. However, apart from a single Mat Carey muttering about the film title, all the rest required another click of the mouse.

Who would be bothered to access this load of anti Wakefield profane rubbish? Only those persons who commented methinks!!

This is your hip, trendy Reddit, Scienceblogs crowd for whom science has become a religion. Orac or David Gorsky, is positively incensed and threatens all manner of protests. Lots at stake here, folks, including money and ego, the latter being perhaps most significant.

I've posted several comments on the site. Haven't seen a one. This is one of them:

England and Wales High Court (Administrative Court)
Decision Between: PROFESSOR JOHN WALKER-SMITH Appellant- and - GENERAL MEDICAL COUNCIL- Respondent.
MR STEPHEN MILLER QC AND MS ANDREA LINDSAY-STRUGO
(instructed by EASTWOODS SOLICITORS) for the Appellant MISS JOANNA GLYNN QC AND MR CHRISTOPHER MELLOR (instructed by FIELD FISHER WATERHOUSE LLP) for the Respondent
Hearing dates: 13th. 14th, 15th, 16th & 17th February 2012.

But following the successful appeal of the paper’s senior clinical investigator – John Walker-Smith – the GMC findings that served as the basis for Lancet’s retraction have since been overturned.
-With regard to the GMC’s false claims that the patients in the paper were not “consecutively referred”: “157. …Thus
construed, this paper does not bear the meaning put upon it by the [GMC] panel. The phrase “consecutively referred” means no more than that thechildren were referred successively, rather than as a single batch, to the Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology.”

-Similarly, the GMC’s rulings that the children in the Lancet paper weresubjects of a research project that did not gain ethical approval also proved unfounded:
“158. …The [GMC] panel’s finding that the description of the patient population in the Lancet paper was misleading would only have been justified if its primary finding that all of the Lancet children were referred for the purposes of research as part of Project 172-96 is sustainable. Because, for the reasons which I have given, it was not, this aspect of its findings must also
fall.”

The judge found only one misleading statement in the paper, but it was not because investigations undertaken were unethical experiments described as gaining ethical approval in the paper according to the now-overturned findings on which the paper’s retraction was based. On the contrary, it was because investigations in the paper were described as being ethically approved when most were clinically indicated and required no such approval, although a few investigations were ethically approved. This may require an erratum, but it does not justify keeping the paper fully retracted.
Read the entire adjudication at: http://www.bailii (dot) org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2012/503.html.

However once you see Matt Cary sleazing all over a comment board, you know people of good conscious and sound minds will never get posted.

Apparently there is quite a distinction between the moral and ethical standards of Jezebel .. which is a sister publication of Gawker .. and .. the Tribeca Film Festival.

Consider:

Recent testimony .. under oath .. reveals that Gawker's "journalistic standard" for "newsworthiness" .. would allow them to present any "celebrity sex tape" involving children .. UNLESS THEY WERE LESS THAN FOUR YEARS OF AGE."

While Tribeca defended their decision to show VAXX:

“Tribeca, as most film festivals, are about dialogue and discussion. Over the years we have presented many films from opposing sides of an issue. We are a forum, not a judge.”

Knowing of the stark "ethical and moral" difference between Jezebel and the Tribeca Film Festival .. I consider Jezebel's cruel attack on Dr Wakefield .. a badge of honor .. testimony to Dr. Wakefield's COURAGE .. while at the same time revealing to all .. the complete "moral and ethical bankruptcy" of Jezebel.

Consider:

The Gawker settlement to Hulk Hogan .. for the dastardly deed of showing a video of Hulk having sex .. (as someone on AoA recently mentioned) .. is a prime example of what is wrong with our country .. which I believe .. for too long a time .. has been teetering on the very same edge of "moral and ethical bankruptcy as is Jezebel.

As evidence of our country's teetering bankruptcies .. consider .. as the former AoA commenter posted (paraphrasing):

If the Vaccine Court rules that a perfectly healthy, totally innocent child DIES .. as a result of a vaccine .. the compensation for that child's DEATH is capped at $250,000. .. as opposed to the $155 MILLION dollars that Hulk was AWARDED by a CIVIL COURT JURY OF HIS PEERS.

Now .. if that is not THE prime example of a COUNTRY GONE COMPLETELY MAD .. having lost all sense of moral and ethical boundaries .. I don't know what would a better example?