Godley ended her article with this chilling summary of what the shutdown by Tribeca means for Americans:

As in America (and globally), it is now believed to be in the public interest to not allow them to view the contents of the documentary and make their own minds up about it. Instead corporate interests are now deciding what is suitable viewing for us all as we are deemed to be incompetent and would not be able to understand the facts presented in the documentary. The premise being that the general population is no longer intelligent enough to make their own minds up about information that is presented to them i.e. we would be taken in by lies, fraudulent claims and pseudoscience and by the babblings of lunatics and guys wearing tinfoil hats etc., That is the image presented in the media and any credibility afforded must be removed and censored for the greater good.

Everyone interested in why “Vaxxed” was cut from Tribeca should listen to what the producer, Del Bigtree, told ABC News in this interview.

Bigtree was asked why he was willing to produce this film. He said that in his experience as the producer for the television show, The Doctors, he was used to getting into controversial topics. He had heard about the CDC whistleblower story, which he said, “led me all the way to Andy Wakefield.” In his subsequent investigation, Bigtree examined the data that CDC researcher Dr. William Thompson had provided. “And it is the most compelling evidence of fraud I’ve ever seen in my life, and I realized in that moment that I was looking at probably the biggest story of my lifetime. And as a journalist, I realized it was a story I had to tell.”

The ABC interviewer showed no interest in the stunning claim of fraud at the agency that regulates vaccines that Bigtree had just mentioned. Instead, she asked about the charges that had been leveled against Dr. Wakefield.

In response to a question about what he hoped people would get out of the film, Bigtree replied with what would seem the obvious response: We need to change the way we regulate vaccines.

My first hope is, I want people to know the truth. I think that vaccines need to be made safer, …More research and study needs to take place.

Bigtree criticized the testing that is done on vaccines, calling it “fraud.” Then he talked his utter frustration over the role of the media in this.

I’d really like a lot more reporters to start getting on this story, getting to the bottom of it. It used to be when something like this happened in the media that we would all jump on it. When a CDC whistleblower, a top scientist from the CDC, comes forward and says, hey, we’re committing fraud in here, I would have expected every news agency in the world to jump on that story. I’m amazed that this film is the only one that is looking at it, so, I want the truth. I want vaccines to be safer for our children, I want vaccines to be tested with the same rigor that every drug we take are. There’s this free pass being given to the vaccines, …

The reporter had no follow-up questions after the incredible statements made by Big tree. Instead, she remarked that the trailer to “Vaxxed” is “scary.” She asked if the film was intended “to scare people, or just inform them.”  Bigtree said the purpose is to educate. “It’s alarming. We all thought that this was over, that the vaccine-autism link had been disproven and we could all move on. I know I thought that and everyone I worked with thought that until new information came forward.”

The ABC reporter moved right along without any interest in what Bigtree had said. She wanted to know how the MMR study in the film was different from the original Wakefield study from 1998. “Is there anything new in this that he wasn’t saying then?”

Bigtree tried to bring the discussion back to reality by saying, “We have the most important health agency in the world, that is supposed to be looking out for the health of children, and they are throwing out data, …and changing numbers on studies to make the vaccine seem safe. That’s nothing like what Andy Wakefield was involved in.”

Bigtree did say that the CDC conducted the 2004 MMR study because of what Wakefield had done, “and it appears they found the exact same thing that Andy Wakefield did. And when they saw it, what they decided to do was hide it and cover it up.”

Once again there was no reaction from the reporter. She moved right along asking about the research that had been done on the picture. Bigtree said they spoken to scientists and doctors from all around the world in the making of the film.  Then he made the riveting statement: “The really sad thing is the amount of doctors I’ve spoken to that say to me, ‘Del, I know that vaccines are causing autism, but I won’t say it on camera because the pharmaceutical industry will destroy my career, just like they did to Andy Wakefield.’ And that’s where we find ourselves, being bullied by an industry that doesn’t actually care about the health of our children like it should.”

Seemingly oblivious to what Bigtree was telling her about the power and control of the drug industry, this reporter could only ask what Bigtree would say in response to critics of the film. His answer: “See the movie, and then you can have an opinion about it.”  He berated the people who condemned the film, and at the same time showed no interest in what an insider at the CDC had to say about the corruption at his agency. He added that this is not a movie about Andrew Wakefield. It is about fraud at the agency that runs the vaccine program.

What ABC News did with Bigtree’s interview was to cut it down to five seconds of airtime. Five seconds where the only thing the film’s producer was heard to say was, “This film is just the truth as we have found it.”

And here we have more proof that the media is the mouthpiece for an industry intent on covering up every aspect of the worldwide nightmare of vaccine injured children.