Albert Enayati, co-founder and board member of SafeMinds, testified in front of the Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC) at its January 2016 meeting, to support SafeMinds' recommendation of forming a workgroup on co-occurring conditions with autism. He stressed that there "is an urgent need for a workgroup to follow promising treatment leads, shepherd existing treatments through clinical trials and facilitate FDA approvals and/or mainstream acceptance."
His full testimony follows:
My name is Albert Enayati. My son regressed into autism after receiving seven vaccines in the space of two days.
Today, I would like to expand on the SafeMinds recommendation to establish a workgroup under the IACC to investigate co-occurring conditions. Many of the most disabling or fatal features that are present in a person on the spectrum are co-morbid conditions. These conditions are amendable to treatment. There is an urgent need for a workgroup to follow promising treatment leads, shepherd existing treatments through clinical trials and facilitate FDA approvals and/or mainstream acceptance. This group would require membership from within the committee as well as significant representation from the broader autism advocacy and research communities. An example is Isaac Kohane, MD of Harvard Medical School[i] who was invited to speak to the IACC in the past and who has the knowledge to advise IACC on this topic. Over the history of the IACC, there has been no coordinated effort to develop treatments for people on the spectrum.
Despite 1.6 billion dollars in spending, parents still have few options that have been proven effective. Risperdal and Abilify are only appropriate for certain symptoms and have significant side effects. We can and must do better. In 2015, researchers at Johns Hopkins University Medical School in collaboration with Massachusetts General Hospital for Children determined that chemicals extracted from broccoli sprouts may help ease autism symptoms[ii] . In another published paper, researchers at Stanford University found that symptoms of autism can be caused by a gene mutation that both blocks the body's natural production of endocannabinoids and also interferes with the way cannabinoids communicate with the brain[iii]. These leads need immediate follow-up and there is currently no mechanism to ensure this.
There are existing medications such as antibiotics, pioglitazone (Actos), and naltrexone that need further study in autism. In addition, there are vitamins and supplements such as folinic acid, melatonin, methyl B-12, carnitine, folinic acid, probiotics and tetrahydrobipterin that have preliminary evidence of efficacy, but need further study. Lastly, many psychiatric medications are prescribed off-label for those with autism despite lack of properly controlled clinical trials and long-term safety studies in this population. A toll-free number and the IAN surveys should be used to collect community input on treatments to be investigated and to report side effects as a way to include the broad community's input. All of these areas need the concentrated attention of a dedicated workgroup to move the research forward. Perhaps most importantly, this workgroup should play a key role in identifying the biomarkers associated with various comorbidities, assessing what treatments might help, and shepherding these treatments through clinical trials. For example, someone with a co-occurring phenotype of PANDAs and tics will have an underlying immune problem (biomarker) and can be treated with an existing and validated intervention (IVIG) for PANDAS. Or, someone with co-occurring irritability and glutathione imbalance can be helped by N-Acetyl Cysteine treatment. We need to investigate broadly what differentiates the biology of people with autism compared to controls and pursue treatments that make sense. Related to all of this, I must draw attention to the fact that the IACCs database of published research in autism is now ridiculously out of date[iv].
Read the full post here.