By Anne Dachel
(Dr. Suzanne Humphries has long been outspoken about her views on vaccines and the health of our children. And if you think that Disneyland and measles, SB277, and vilification of non-vaxxers are just random events, think again! There is a worldwide plan in play here and it's been around for decades.)
Informed consent. We’ve all heard about it. It’s the simple concept that with any medical product or procedure, an individual should have full knowledge of the possible risks and benefits.
Most people would readily acknowledge that it’s the only fair and ethical thing to do.
Webster’s Dictionary defines medical informed consent as: a formal agreement that a patient signs to give permission for a medical procedure (such as surgery) after having been told about the risks, benefits, etc.
The patient’s right of self-decision can be effectively exercised only if the patient possesses enough information to enable an informed choice. The patient should make his or her own determination about treatment. The physician's obligation is to present the medical facts accurately to the patient or to the individual responsible for the patient’s care and to make recommendations for management in accordance with good medical practice. The physician has an ethical obligation to help the patient make choices from among the therapeutic alternatives consistent with good medical practice. Informed consent is a basic policy in both ethics and law that physicians must honor, unless the patient is unconscious or otherwise incapable of consenting and harm from failure to treat is imminent.
So do we have real informed consent when it comes to vaccinating our children?
Dr. Suzanne Humphries explained the reality of this concept as it applies to vaccines in a talk in Copenhagen, Denmark called, “Manufactured Consent,” given in November, 2015.
Dr. Humphries began her presentation by describing how “the medical system attempts to get people to behave and conform." She continued, "You would think, as with other medical procedures, that solid science would be at the core of patient information consent. The reality is that the choices you make medically have never been on the basis of informed consent. In 2015, informed consent is even less likely to happen than it would have been 10 or even 30 years ago.
“In 1997, the World Health Organization formulated a strategy which was put into a book called, The Strategic Plan, which laid out a map to completely change the way people thought about vaccines.
“The plan had key points which were: using the media to structure messages that shaped public opinion to co-opt or persuade key opinion people in all levels of society—medical, lay and entertainment; to get pro-vaccine spokespeople at every level conveying one message, and one message only. This plan emphasized private/public partnership and philanthropy with the aim to make vaccines the core topic in society. …”
Humphries focused on the role of Bill Gates in promoting worldwide vaccination. “In 2010, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation donated $10 billion to make 2010 to 2020, ‘the decade of vaccines.’”
How has this played out?
Humphries explained that in 2015 in the U.S. the goals are: “making vaccines mandatory for all people,… making vaccines a lifestyle event for all people from cradle to grave, and broadening the appeal of live-viral vaccines for their immune system benefits, not just for their disease-preventing benefits.”
This plan by the WHO goes back almost 25 years, with updates along the way, according to Humphries. It involves the partnership of “a computer software billionaire, the pharmaceutical industry, academia, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and the World Health Organization—all speaking and working in unison toward the same goal.” She said that their goal is global medical tyranny. We’ve seen it in the “war against a new public menace: the vaccine hesitant.” Evidence of this includes the Disneyland measles outbreak, SB277 ending personal exemptions in California, and similar bills being pushed in other states.
Humphries cited an article from Forbes back in August, 2015 called, “How Do You Change An Anti-Vaccine Parent's Mind? Scare The Crap Out Of Them,” by Tara Haelle
Humphries: In order to ‘scare the crap of them,’ they have to restrict information, “because when doctors and parents have all facts and make the connections between their children’s sickness and vaccines, they want to know more, and they’ll start looking for themselves.”
“Journalists have to be censored.” Humphries cited Dr. Paul Offit and HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, both of whom called for an end to fair and balanced coverage of the vaccine debate by the media. There have even been articles in Forbes demanding that doctors who speak out negatively about any aspect of vaccination have their licenses revoked and non-vaccinating parents be sued.
What about the people who are coming down with diseases they’ve been vaccinated against? Humphries discussed natural vs. vaccine immunity and waning efficacy. She explained how the vaccine history the public receives is cherry-picked information that excludes serious concerns.
Very disturbing was the account by Humphries of the changes she witnessed in the health of children.
“It looked like sickness normally started in adulthood. In my pediatric rotations decades before, I saw what normal was then, but 20 years later, what’s considered ‘normal’ is a lot sicker than it was back then. …
“Parents notice their kids get sick after vaccination and they’re tired of hearing that it’s just coincidence.”
In her own medical practice Humphries had the opportunity to see unvaccinated children. Their health outcomes were markedly different from the general population. Doctors should be interested in these healthy kids and want to study them, but they aren’t and they don’t want to. She referred to her education on vaccines as “an oppressive form of religion, preached as gospel by leading authorities who act as if their narrow truth is the only righteous belief. Explaining the broader concepts…is akin to heresy.”
Humphries cited Dr. Greg Poland, a leading vaccine expert in the U.S. who actually said, ‘I like to say it this way: You can think of influenza and rubella vaccines as anti-autism vaccines.’ Mayo Clinic doctors like Poland are allowed by Google to determine “what is vaccine fact and what is vaccine fiction.” This is an attempt to restrict the information the public receives on vaccines. She also mentioned that Paul defended the use of aluminum in vaccines as playing “an important role in the development of a healthy fetus,” and he claimed that a baby can tolerate 10,000 to 100,000 vaccines at once. Furthermore, she noted the role of Poul Thorsen, a “wanted health care fugitive,” who’s walking the streets in Denmark. His research on vaccines is used by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to disprove a link between vaccines and autism. She said that an arrest warrant has been issued for Thorsen, but officials don’t seem interested in enforcing it. He has been accused of wire fraud and money laundering but continues to publish medical articles. He’s still doing research with his name on published studies—funded by the CDC!
“Corruption within top governmental institutions”
Humphries described the revelations by the CDC whistleblower, Dr. William Thompson and how he continues to work at the CDC, “just like Thorsen continues to be funded by the CDC.”
Humphries noted that doctors are not inclined to want to speak out because of what has happened to Andrew Wakefield, the British doctor who linked the MMR vaccine to GI disease and autism in his patients, a result she called, being “Wakefielded.”
Humphries ended her talk saying that the facts are coming to light for parents. They’re realizing that phony science is being used to defend medical tyranny when it comes to vaccination, and doctors are using fear to force parents to vaccinate and condemning them if they refuse.
Thus ended part one. (The rest of Suzanne’s talk can be found on the links on the sidebar.)