Dachel Media Update: Autism GroupSpeaks
By Anne Dachel
Dec 15, 2015, AutismSpeaks.org: Top 10 autism research stories of 2015
What did our community think about these advances? To answer that question, here are our most-read and shared autism research stories of 2014.
2014? A little typo here. Autism Speaks obviously means 2015. NO MATTER. It's all dead-end, nothing conclusive science that can't conceivably be considered "advances."
Autism Speaks also lied to us here.
#3 No MMR-autism link in large study of vaccinated versus unvaccinated kids
In April, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) published the largest-ever study comparing autism rates among vaccinated versus unvaccinated children.
This is a comparison of children who received two doses of the MMR to those who only received one and still had all the other vaccines as well.
The only difference between the two groups was that if a child didn't receive the second MMR, they were considered unvaxxed.
Anne Dachel is Media Editor for Age of Autism and author of The Big Autism Cover-Up: How and Why the Media Is Lying to the American Public, which is on sale now from Skyhorse Publishing.
As to Autism Speaks' study finding the 2nd MMR shot at age 4-6 years does not cause autism, an appropriate metaphor would have Infant Cars in a constant "demolition derby" (i.e., all their prior vaccinations) during their first four years, and upon turning four years old have their mangled cars "tap bumpers" (i.e., their 2nd MMR shot).
How could anybody possibly detect what additional damage was caused by the 2nd MMR shot?
I just heard this morning on radio yet another phony Autism Speaks ad citing 1 baby in 110 now has autism, and then soothingly saying "early detection makes a difference." Autism Speaks ranks right there with the criminals at CDC et al.
Posted by: david m burd | December 18, 2015 at 09:04 AM
Why is everyone going around the block another ten times? - why is Professor Andrew Fisher looking into the implications of mercury meeting phosphorous in the brain and its possible link to Mad Hatters Disease over 120 years ago? 'Certain mercury molecules can impact with phosphorous to cause decoherence'!!! Doesn't that sound warning signals about autism?, isn't Mad Hatters Disease and autism almost indistinguishable?
Tony Bateson
Posted by: Tony Bateson | December 17, 2015 at 01:39 PM
CDC whistle blower Dr. William Thompson, Rep Posey is requesting government hearings, CDC is criminals, Autism Speaks Lies that have further hurt a nation of children, they are criminal. The increase in autism coincides with the increase in childhood vaccines, but yet we all continue to argue moot points, genetic epidemics? Harming 1 child should have been enough, but money rules the debate until the debaters with the money suffer the loss of a child, most already know better then to vaccinate their own children.
Posted by: Bella Thomas | December 17, 2015 at 09:30 AM
Danchi,
In my humble opinion, there could be something to the BPA, mother's hormones, and antidepressants. The cell phone research has already been done and is damning. That it is not public knowledge and is being ignored is a clue to it's significance and it is a shame and a crime. There is no doubt that a cell phone kept in a man's pocket damages sperm and decreases viable cells by I believe 40%.
http://news.yale.edu/2012/03/15/cell-phone-use-pregnancy-may-cause-behavioral-disorders-offspring
See especially sections 10,18,19,20:
http://www.bioinitiative.org/table-of-contents/
Posted by: Linda1 | December 16, 2015 at 09:58 PM
Hi Anne,
I realize it's not new but on this.... "#3 No MMR-autism link in large study of vaccinated versus unvaccinated kids...". has there been a more detailed deconstruction or rebuttal of this study on a previous occasion here on AoA? Thanks
Posted by: Art of Autism | December 16, 2015 at 09:47 PM
I do believe the first study that will be done in January 2016 will be Teen Dads and immature parental age and the adverse effects of too much video game playing and cell phone use that causes cataclysmic damage to immature sperm development prior to conception.
******
I wouldn't doubt that you're right .
By the one thing we can say with absolute certainty, is that a study comparing health outcomes of vaccinated children, to completely unvaccinated children…. will never be done.
Posted by: Barry | December 16, 2015 at 09:09 PM
Anne .. god bless you for all you do .. may have given AS a "benefit of doubt" .. they don't deserve.
In my humble opinion .. I don't think AS "obviously meant 2015" .. I think they may have been merely stating the truth.
In my admittedly biased opinion .. it is quite possible .. AS has NO .. "most read and shared autism research stories of 2015" .. that I can recall?
Posted by: Bob Moffitt | December 16, 2015 at 04:18 PM
Posted by: Danchi | December 16, 2015 at 04:13 PM
Anne,
I know you know what I'm about to say, but it's worth repeating here for AoA readers: Per The Immunization Schedule the 2nd MMR shot cited by the Autism Speaks' study is recommended for children aged 4 to 6 years.
Of course the damning truth is The Immunization Schedule mandates 26 doses of single/combination vaccines injected by 7 months; by 18 months the number of injected single/combination vaccine doses rises to 46 (both totals include flu shots at 6 months, 7 months, and 18 months).
Virtually all autism spectrum cases, along with the immense damage to the gut and all the other terrible, chronic damages, occur in temporal lockstep with the injected vaccines, and manifest before the age of 4 to 6 years when the 2nd MMR dose comes up on The Schedule.
Autism Speaks' appropriate name is Autism Speaks Lies.
Posted by: david m burd | December 16, 2015 at 02:55 PM