Dachel Asks Doctors: Thoughts on the CDC Whistleblower
Radio Interview with Laura Hayes RE SB277 and Vaccine Mandates

Flu Shot As Craig's List Ad

Heart-syringeIt's here! Time to save 20% on your CVS (we don't sell cigarettes any longer, they're dangerous!) purchase. All you have to do is submit to a liability free, mercury filled, if it were a car with this fail rate it would be a lemon flu shot!   We ran this post last Fall. But flu shot season, like Groundhog day, happens every year.

LET ME BE YOUR ARM CANDY


MDV seeks GSBWBHAMF for relationship. Could get serious and last a lifetime. Available to hook up anywhere, school, Church, grocery store, community center, drug store, mass merchant store, hospital or walk in medical center. No experience necessary, I'll do all the work. Must appreciate high fail rate, possibility of flu like symptoms for up to several weeks and a bolus dose of neurotoxic mercury.  On the plus side, you might be so injured as to receive compensation from the United States Government. Take a chance. Let me roll up your sleeve tonight, Call (666) 637-2079.

By Kim Stagliano, December 2014

New outlets reported last week that the flu shot is a poor match for the current viruses.   Fox News pointed out the some experts are questioning the CDC's forecasting:

CDC sent an advisory to doctors noting that one component of this year's flu vaccine was only partially protective against the predominant flu virus, known as influenza A (H3N2), which has mutated since the current flu shots were made....

"No one really knows what is going on here with the flu strains and the match using the current methods," said Michael Osterholm, an infectious disease expert from the University of Minnesota.

In a 2011 paper, Osterholm found flu shots only protected about 59 percent of the population. "For all we know, this vaccine may work as well as it does every other year."

Dr. Richard Zimmerman of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, however, said that, while not perfect, the methods offer "a reasonable proxy" for what will happen.

Can you imagine any other product failing to perform so badly and yet being pushed, in some cases virtually forced, on Americans like the flu vaccine?  If this were a car, heck, a a child's toy...  it would be banned for abject failure. 

The war on flu is akin to the American war on drugs. We know it's not working, we know it's creating problems, we know the return on investment in terms of actual health is dismal but we keep hammering away with "Just Say No."  Someone has a good return on investment though - that's American healthcare.



Flu Shot Roulette Deer Hunter A Gamondes (3)In all of the effort to make sure you and everyone you love gets a flu shot, there is never any mention of side effects - the blissful vaccine bubble of imaginary safety remains intact. While every drug has to declare its side effects, vaccines can be sold like Dr. Pepper without so much as a mention of potential problems.

Forbes Magazine covered the CDC advisory, "Is This Year's Flu Shot Any Good?" If you haven’t yet gotten your flu shot, get to it. There’s no down side, and the protection, while not perfect, might still save you weeks of misery, and perhaps even your life.

No down side?  Wow. Talk about glibly misleading readers. But go ahead, per Forbes. Go get that vaccine. You know, in case it sort of maybe might on the off chance work.   "Gut" thing we didn't adopt that attitude after December 7, 1941, ja?

House of Cards 200 pixelsKim Stagliano is Managing Editor of Age of Autism. Her new novel,  House of Cards; A All I Can Handle 50 pixel Kat Cavicchio romantic suspense is available from Amazon in all e-formats now. Her memoir, All I Can Handle I'm No Mother Teresa is available in hardcover, paperback and e-book.




Comments

Matilda R

The flu shot is a hoax. It doesn't target all the strains known to promote flu, U R better off drinking chicken soup and eating raw garlic than the taking the flu shot.

Jeannette Bishop

The flu vaccine bandwagon is one reason why we have Dr. Humphries's advocacy, something major to be grateful for IMO ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJ-t9nCD2yE

but otherwise it is extremely disturbing to behold.

david m burd

Correction: In my prior comment citing Flu Tracking in Australia, I accidentally left out the word "predominately". Here is the corrected sentence with 'predominately' added:

Like the U.S. any pediatric "flu-associated" mortality is predominately among youngsters having very serious pre-conditons, abetted by toxic medical treatments.

Steve

Actually with less caution than Dr. Pepper in some places:

"WARNING: Drinking beverages with added sugar(s) contributes to obesity, diabetes, and tooth decay. This is a message from the City and County of San Francisco."

david m burd

Kim, For over a decade Australia has published its "Flu Tracking" survey of about 25,000 citizen participants; about 2/3 take an annual flu shot about 1/3 do NOT take the shot.

Over their entire flu season, two and 1/2 percent of those taking the shot report having defined flu symptoms, whereas three percent of those NOT taking the shot report the same flu symptoms.

So, out of 200 Aussies refusing the shot there is one more person reporting flu symptoms compared to 200 Aussies taking the shot. AND, importantly, "flu-associated" mortality is a small fraction per capita of the U.S., and is typically very elderly. It is rare year that Australia's Health System has even a single pediatric "flu-associated" death (16 years old or under). Like the U.S. any pediatric "flu-associated" mortality is among youngsters having very serious pre-conditons, abetted by toxic medical treatments.

But, you make a critically important point: Adverse effects caused by the flu shot (that can be very serious) are NOT part of the Aussie Flu Tracking. For instance, four years ago Australia called off their flu shots after hundreds of young convulsing children were rushed to hospitals after getting their shots - of course this MAJOR EPISODE was completely ignored by U.S. media, who merrily and ceaselessly promoted flu shots for all.

Finally, there is a great body of medical literature citing adequate nutrition - particularly a strong base of Vitamin D - is the best deterrent to coming down with Flu or respiratory illnesses during the dark months of late Winter. Our CDC (Centers for Disease Complicity) is completely negligent when they push toxic flu shots - and NEVER mention such as proper nutrition. THEY - the CDC - are a national disgrace in every aspect.

Ottoschnaut

I focused on the flu shot when my county school system in the past two weeks sent home a flyer n my 5th grader's backpack, put out a robocall, and sent a text message to my phone. They are pushing the Fulnase live attenuated inhaled virus vaccine.

I went to the Flunase website to educate myself. From memory:

27% will get nasal symptoms
16% sore throat
9% lethargy
9% loss of appetite
10% or more will spike a fever to 100 degrees or more
2.4% of kids not inhaling the vaccine will contract Flunase strain influenza due to viral shedding, which continues for up to 28 days from kids who take the stuff.

I went to my school board meeting and recited this set of facts. I pointed out that county policy is kids with a fever of 100 or higher must stay home until 24 hours after fever abates.

I was directed to call my county health officer. The county health officer: 1) said the Flunase website is wrong; 2) could not produce a single peer reviewed study showing Flunase is safe or effective; and 3) dismissed BMJ Marketing Vaccines by Marketing Disease May 16, 2013 by saying BMJ is not a medical journal (actually it has an impact rating of 18), and by suggesting that Dr. Doshi, a post doc fellow at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine when he wrote the editorial, is not credible, I asked her if she had read the article and she said no. She directed me to CDC website for information on Flunase.

Here is some back up data for individuals considering this issue:

"Dr. Morris was chief vaccine officer for the Bureau of Biological Standards at the National Institutes of Health and later with the Food and Drug Administration, when the bureau was transferred to that agency in the 1970s.

He argued that research carried out by his unit demonstrated that there was no reliable proof that vaccines were effective in preventing influenza, and he accused the government of basing its mass vaccine programs for flu primarily on claims made by pharmaceutical manufacturers.

The issue came to a head in 1976 when President Gerald R. Ford signed a bill appropriating $135 million to vaccinate 140 million people against swine flu that fall and the next winter. Dr. Morris was outspoken in his opposition to the inoculations.

Subsequent events seemed to support Dr. Morris’s skepticism. The 1976 swine flu vaccinations were fraught with problems, and the government discontinued the inoculations after 49 million had received the vaccine.

The incidence of swine flu among the vaccinated was seven times greater than it was among those who had not been vaccinated, according to news reports. In addition, 12 Americans who had been vaccinated against swine flu died of complications related to Guillain-Barre syndrome, a polyneuropathy affecting the peripheral nervous system. More than 200 were paralyzed, news accounts said."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/obituaries/vaccine-specialist-j-anthony-morris-dies-at-95/2014/07/03/e786b9b8-0228-11e4-8572-4b1b969b6322_story.html

"Closer examination of influenza vaccine policies shows that although proponents employ the rhetoric of science, the studies underlying the policy are often of low quality, and do not substantiate officials’ claims. The vaccine might be less beneficial and less safe than has been claimed, and the threat of influenza appears overstated."

http://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f3037

The flu vaccine is and always has been a naked scam. The evidence is available to anyone who does the most basic research. Parents can and should hammer their local school boards and ask the question: "If 10% of the kids given this vaccine will spike a fever of 100 degrees, what is the benefit? What s the logic behind introducing four strains of live influenza virus into the school environment where the kids are packed together and the likelihood of infectious transmission of a real danger?"

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)