Where is the data demonstrating to so called "safety" of vaccines? Well at the Vaccine Sadety Datalink (VSD)
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/Act...sing-data.html
Is the database open for anyone to look into?
Nope, it is considered restricted data http://www.cdc.gov/rdc/ (even access to just raw numbers without identifications is restricted, so much for transparent science...)

How do you access it? It is based on a 3 step process

1 Submisson of proposals to NCHS RDC
2 Submission of proposal to VSD participating sites Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)
3 Access of VSD data

This is for the old data (before the "epidemic" of neuro-degenerative diseases in children)... how do you access the new one? well according to
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/Act...uidelines.html

"Please note: data for new vaccine safety studies are available only through December 31, 2000. Therefore, the RDC will not accept proposals requesting VSD data after December 31, 2000, for new vaccine safety studies. Access to VSD sites’ data after December 31, 2000 for new vaccine safety studies may be accessed through establishing a formal collaboration with the VSD site(s); however, such collaboration is at the discretion of the VSD site and outside the scope of the RDC data sharing program and CDC authority. "

So much for transparent science... and undeniable proof...

Yes, mumps offers protection against ovarian cancer.

Measles without rash is associated with sebaceous skin disease, degenerative disease of bone and cartilage and certain tumors, in adult life; and, the presence of measles antibodies at the time of infection - as in vaccine-triggered titer - interferes with the common immunological response: you won't develop the rash.

Only since the varicella vaccine was licensed in '95 have babies and toddlers developed shingles, previously reserved for adults and the elderly.

Vaccination's turned immunity on its ear.

In USA Today (and elsewhere), about an actress who at 25 was diagnosed with ovarian cancer. Nowhere is the public told that the antibodies created by a natural (wild) mumps infection has been shown to protect against later development of ovarian cancer - antibodies that are not created by the vaccine.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/people/2015/04/24/cobie-smulders-battles-ovarian-cancer/26301307/

"The epidemiology of mumps parotitis has obviously changed dramatically in the last 40 years. Mumps parotitis was a very common illness in infants and children prior to 1970. With now close to universal vaccination except in the third world, mumps has become a disease of adults who were either born too early for routine vaccination or who have lost immunity after vaccination. For this reason, inferences about the consequences of parotitis on MUC1 immunity based on observations from the specimens tested here may not be generalizable to what might have occurred with childhood infection before vaccination programs began. We point out, however, that the anti-MUC1 antibody response was most robust in younger women suggesting that childhood infection, as would have occurred in the past, might have been the optimum time for engendering immunity against ovarian cancer.

Clearly, mumps vaccination only creates anti-viral antibodies and would not lead to anti-MUC1 antibodies, which we show here require an active parotitis. If it is true that symptomatic mumps protected against ovarian cancer through an immune reaction, a logical consequence is that we might expect an increased incidence of ovarian cancer as symptomatic mumps parotitis infections have decreased through vaccination. In a paper examining incidence patterns for ovarian cancer FROM 1978 TO 1998, RATES OF INVASIVE SEROUS, ENDOMETRIOID, AND CLEAR CELL TUMOR INCREASED over this time period among white females [24]. Endometrioid and clear cell cancers are the types of ovarian cancer that we found were most strongly linked to the conditions we proposed might be mediated through anti-MUC1 antibodies [10]. The above incidence data may be confounded by diagnostic trends, but re-examination of these disease rates with more recent data and a focus on the birth cohorts most likely to have been vaccinated should be undertaken.

Prior to vaccination, mumps was generally a mild illness but could have serious sequelae including orchitis and sterility, meningitis and deafness, and pancreatitis. Nevertheless, our study suggests there could also have been unanticipated long-term ANTICANCER BENEFITS OF A MUMPS INFECTION, such as we have described in this paper."

So, in this push to give multiple doses of MMR to every child and adult, where is the concern about the increase in ovarian cancer that scientist believe this intervention is directly causing?

Have to get that HPV vaccine to theoretically protect against cervical cancer, but ovarian cancer? No one seems to care.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2951028/

@Linda1,

I agree. But the one point I might take issue is that 'it's going to happen anyway."

I'm not so sure about that. Example: The % of special ed students who are autistic is quite high. Those kids are in IEP programs, which 'supposedly' provide them with a FAPE under the IDEA/No Child Left Behind Act.

You cannot take those kids out of these programs and equivocate that their homeschool programs will also provide them with a FAPE. There are state funded programs these students are entitled to, so not quite sure how they're going to address that issue on any legal basis.

This is a very poorly drafted piece of legislature, but one also of which I am certain was 'vetted' by certain state legal authorities before being pushed through.

I certainly hope the ACLU goes to bat for Californians should this horrid bill be signed off by our governor. They need to put 'deed to word.' If the ACLU is so against this bill, I guess we'll see how far they'll go to defend our rights in this state, should this bill land on our governor's desk for signature.

@Linda1:

I like your idea, but remember that many parents just simply cannot provide a homeschool environment for their children for a variety of reasons.

It is enormously expensive to live here in California. I'm sure most of you realize this. Owning a home is out of reach for many. For most, including my family at one point, it requires two incomes to simply keep your head above water.

But having said that, I've been in contact with a former homeschool support group I used to use when homeschooling Ryan. It's called the Tri Valley Explorers. The group is located in the East Bay Area and offers an enormous support base for those considering taking on this option for their family.

I received a lovely email from Christina/TVE today. She encourages all those in this area to contact her via her website. Here's their link:

http://www.trivalleyexplorers.com/

They don't want to hear what their constituents have to say. They had the audacity to mute the microphones when the people they are supposed to be representing dared to speak.

They were annoyed that so many people called them, that so many wrote to them.

WELL FINE. IF THEY REFUSE TO LISTEN, THEN STOP TALKING AND SHOW THEM.

Anyone who can, just take the kids out of school. Call the California Homeschooler's Association to find out how to legally homeschool in California and just do it.

May I suggest that you begin your homeschooling adventure with an intensive, in depth, real world social studies/science lesson facilitated by traveling with the kids to other states to look for new homes and places to do business. Think of all the geography, culture with the goal of getting out of crazy town for good. Think of the social skills they'll gain watching the real estate and business transactions. Washington State is close by. North Carolina is a beautiful state. Both rejected what California is about to pass.

Gut the schools. Now.

If you don't do it now, you'll be doing it later anyway because they intend to pass this regardless of what you want, and what is right.

I don't believe that focusing only on the representatives and registering your opinion is enough. Theirs is a divide and conquer attack, and vaccine rights advocates should use the same technique.

The numbers of vaccine abstainers is a drop in the bucket compared the families who have no clue as to the true nature of vaccine issues and remember, it's not being reported in the media anywhere. Direct campaigning is a must.

When you get off the phone with your rep and the next committee, start emailing information to every daycare and school in your area, every teacher that has an email link that you can find, every school board member, every afterschool activity leader that makes a business off kids, because when they are done with the schools and daycares, they'll take aim at kid based businesses.

They have no idea what's coming down the pipe. They need to know what viable safe alternatives there are to vaccines (ex. the vit. D3 research from japan showing it 8 times more effective than vaccines for influenza A in children, and its positive effects on asthma. How about the WHO's acknowlegement that Vit. A could reduce the risk of mortality from measles in Africa by 70%? Link to studies showing the effects of vitamin C on viruses.)

They need a fast easy history of vaccine shenanigans. Start with basic easy to absorb info and build up. How about the chart showing measles declined before the vaccine hit the market, and any other disease that pertains to. How about the recent UK compensation for narcolepsy, how about the surveys showing unvaccinated kids are healthier. How about the one showing MORE doctor visits occuring AFTER wellness checks, how about the progress being made about HOW the damage of HPV is working in the body, how about the paralyzing people with polio shots in India fiasco, and the countries putting moratoriums in place for the HPV, how about the fact that OTHER countries DON'T mandate ANY vaccines for public school education and probably not for the teachers, either). Is the person you are contacting African American or a minority who has been discriminated against historically for other reasons? Tell the about William Thompson's revelations. Line it up like a story, send an email every day to the same people with a new bit of info and at the bottom of each one tell them who to contact to register their opposition! Tell them teachers are next,and that its now or never! Too shy to aim it at your own kid's school? Send them to someone else's school - any school at all.

When you are done with the teachers, educate the school board members and send to the PTA links.

You may not be able to win reps over with the science, but you can use science to increase the numbers that that stand with you against discrimination.

Find out where those reps live and what schools are in their areas and target them first. They and their wives have to live in neighborhoods with other people and look them in the eye. Let those neighbors know what the hell is going on!

Any of those reps go to church anywhere? Check out their neighborhood churches and start sending information to those pastors and church group contacts. Think they might care about discrimination being perpetuated by their very own member, someone they thought had their back and wouldn't sell out to lobbyists?

Any of those reps part of other groups? Find out and start sending information to those groups, and then let them one of their members just sold out in the biggest worst way possible. Have any of them stood up for African American groups before? Find out and then contact those groups about William Thompson and tell them to register their complaints.
Tell Pan's constituants and the yes vote reps' constituants what he just did. Remember, 97.5% of Californian right now have no idea what is going down and you can't bet on the media to help.

Get on the Asthma support groups and tell them about the timing of the dip/pert/tet shot and that the CDC knows that by altering the sched it would reduce asthma risk in boys by 50%. Ask them if they want to give up the right to decline that booster in the future? Parents of kids with asthma wouldn't wish it on someone else. Then give them the list of committee reps to contact.

Has the gay and lesbian community experienced any discrimination in the school system from bullying? Contact them and tell them about this discrimination. They have a very vocal and active community that doesn't hesitate to pick up the phone and make a comment. Connect the dots for them! If there is a vaccine against HIV, but it kills or maims a certain percentage of previously healthy gay people, should they be allowed to decline it or forced to take it?

Reps don't care if 2.5 percent of California gets pissed, but if you start undermining their support from other directions, you just might succeed!

I get it. Sounds like a good idea but it needs to get coordinated soon. Yes, rip their tax base out. NVIC has a good article up on proposed changes to VAERS reporting. Apparently the poor docs were feeling threatened by having to put their offices to the report. Sketchy as it used to be it looks like they were attempting to make it more so.

I FEEL LIKE HOLDING A HOMESCHOOL SESSION ON THE US CONSTITUTION AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS RIGHT ON THE CAPITOL STEPS TO SHOW THEM THAT WE ARE NOT GOING TO JUST GO AWAY. THIS IS THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT WE NEED TO SHOW THEM, IN THEIR FACE THAT WE KNOW OUR RIGHTS. ANYONE WANT TO JOIN???

Pan is Corrupt,
No, I don't mean playing hooky for a couple of days. That is truancy and against the law. I mean pull them out of school permanently - homeschool starting today.

If the bill doesn't pass and people decide they want to put their kids back, they always can. But for now, I'd pull as many out of the public school system as possible. That will cause an immediate financial crisis for the public school system and the state.

Show these bastards that you are't going to allow them to sell your children. Show them that you mean business.

And any businesses that won't stay in or move to California under this law need to let these legislators know. A petition of business entities against the bill would get their attention. Let them know they will lose their tax base.

Some interesting information was revealed by Kennedy about CDC whistleblower, Dr. William Thompson. Thompson invoked federal whistleblower status this summer and hired leading whistleblower attorney, Morgan VerKamp, to represent him on his claim that his superiors had required him to lie for the past ten years about the connection between vaccines and autism. He has turned over tens of thousands of pages of documents to Congress and has "asked" to be subpoenaed by Congress. The matter is currently before Congressman Jason Chaffetz's Oversight committee. Kennedy related how the chief of staff of Chaffetz's office had said that these documents, when they are released, "are not just a smoking gun, but a wildfire that will burn CDC to its foundations."

Where in the process are these documents? This would be a good time to bring them out into the light.

Barry
Read elsewhere leyva and runner were the 2 no votes, god bless them.

*********

I think you missed my point.

Oppose Senate Bill 277 - Protect Your Rights​

The Health committee has a hotline - 916-651-4111 - you can leave a yes or no vote on SB277 on their recording. Don't tie it up with arguments - just say you are against it. That's it. Apparently they are counting these up and that may influence the meeting. They will stop counting soon, so call now!!! http://on.fb.me/1c6gJw3

@Linda1, maybe that's an idea. Before the end of the school year there could be a day or two designated as a sit out for those who oppose this. No attending daycare or school. And this should include anyone who doesn't agree with forcing the full, on time schedule, even if they have given some. Because they will be forced to comply fully if this passes. 2 days off is a hardship for some but it will be worse when one parent is forced to stay home to homeschool of the bill passes.

Those in favor of SB277 haven't had the enlightening experience of witnessing vaccine injury firsthand. Senator Pan has never held his beautiful baby and watch it arch it's back and scream that high pitched scream for hours on end. Frank DeStefano hasn't changed twelve to fifteen diapers in one day from his child with a distended, bloated belly. Julie Gerberding hasn't left a toddler's birthday party in tears carrying her tantruming, biting, scratching, slapping 2 year-old knowing that was the last one her child would ever be invited to. Paul Offit has never woken up at 2 am hearing the sound of his child falling out of bed and having a seizure on the floor. Someone please find me a pharmaceutical lobbyist whose child has disappeared from the house, walked into the nearest retention pond, lake, or swimming pool and drowned. Hey, Robert Chen, hey Harvey Alter, yo John Coffin!!! Let's see you wake up every day at 4 am prepare thirteen supplements, cook organic meatballs, prep fermented cabbage and coconut, clean up a urine soaked bed, or vomit, or smeared feces while trying not to get spit on then you can get ready to go to work. Not that your health insurance covers your vaccine damaged child's medical needs because according to all of you there's no such thing as vaccine injury. So go ahead, maybe your bill will get passed. Why should you care? It didn't happen to you or your children. Your grandchildren and great grandchildren along with millions of others (who would have otherwise been healthy) may not be so lucky, and they'll have you in part to thank for it.

I just read this article. And nowhere in it, did it say the names of the politicians who voted in favor of this.

Coming down hard on "a committee", is absolute an waste of time. It's like pointing an angry finger at the sky.

If you want to stop this in it's tracks, then for God sakes put some teeth in your protest. Start pointing your finger at the PEOPLE who made this happen. The politicians who are willing to fatten their bank accounts, at the expense of the nations children.

And while you're at it, see what else might be hiding in their closets.

Very sad ! You can't trust politicians for anything.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JSBhI_0at0

Corruption.
More infectious than any disease the Pan-derers claim they are preventing and far more damaging.

I have tried to find some way to view all of this as positive. One thing is: we have found each other. We have built a community. We will need each other going into the future. Even if we are ghetto-ized, ours will be the healthy ghetto. I'm hoping that at some point, the tipping point will be reached (when enough children are sick) and the whole vaccine adventure will fall apart.

In fact, here is another possibility: Big Pharma knows the end is coming. That's why they've pushed these bills -- to eek out just a few more bucks before it just becomes too obvious. Because it will become obvious, when kids are all shot up with the 300 vaccines coming down the pike. Hopefully there will still be enough resisters to create a healthy remaining pocket of children for the future....

At some point, though, this will all come to a crashing end.

Hell is never hot enough for these corrupt Pharma Whores.

My thoughts and prayers are with America.

MMR RIP

I feel like someone has died. That's right.... it's Uncle Sam. RIP

If politics is mostly about money -- and so it seems -- we need to think seriously about what that means for the future of our children.

Thanks Kent. I just can't believe that they have got away with all that deception, especially in a matter to do with children's health. They have no doubt vastly underestimated how many people are concerned by this (both the level of corruption and the issue itself). I feel many parents may have spaced out vaccines or omitted some but this will force the issue.

I cannot even begin to describe the utter contempt I feel for those members of the Education Committee who sold out the children of their state, and voted in favor of this travesty of justice (against the will of their constituents!).
Extreme ignorance, cowardice and/or corruption are the reasons one would vote for this bill, and none of those are acceptable!
Follow the money, as this most certainly is not at all about "children's health."
This is definitely not over!

Thank you so much. Comforting. I love Age of Autism site. This was a travesty today.