Vaccines, Fear, and the Future
121 cases of the measles
121 cases of the measles that included recovery
121 cases of the measles with no deaths reported
121 cases of the measles that sent our country into a tailspin.
I honestly thought the onslaught of measles articles would have subsided by now. But we’re going into month two of measles mania.
The news coverage hasn’t helped to change the subject nor to reduce the level of anxiety too many are experiencing. Instead of properly reporting on what’s usually a temporary illness, the press took what could have been a simple FYI (Measles has been spotted), to using full-on fear tactics (We’re all gonna die), to encouraging the public to turn on each other (Unvaccinated? Round ‘em up, Nazi-Germany style!).
Pre-measles mania, for the most part, we worked together. Sure we had differences with others and didn’t always see eye-to-eye on every issue, but we respected each other’s points of view. That included vaccine choice. But as the measles mania grew, and as the media and the government bodies that oversee and benefit from the US vaccine program took every chance they could to paint a pretty picture about vaccines, those choosing not to vaccinate quickly became the enemy.
In early December, before the measles was a daily headline, the majority of the public wasn’t vocal that some folks were unvaccinated. Yes, pro-vaccine groups took it upon themselves to viciously attack parents in the past when vaccine stories occasionally surfaced, but the public didn’t. The public didn’t fear the unvaccinated kid next door. They didn’t fear their niece who was up-to-date on shots. They didn’t know if their boss or co-worker, or that stranger in line ahead of them at the grocery store was unvaccinated. They wouldn’t even think to ask the city bus driver if he’d gotten boosters at his physical last year or not either. But now? Oh, boy. Everyone’s a suspect. And the public has been groomed to respond with venom to anyone stating that they are a vaccine choice proponent.
To vaccinate or to not vaccinate is a private decision. That decision is usually based on an individual’s health care needs, not on illogical fear. Sadly, since the latest measles mania began, fear is overriding logic. And it’s fueling an unnecessary and an unfortunate divide. In two short months, it’s become okay to shame someone who does not vaccinate. It’s okay to bully them, to belittle them, and to be ready to turn them in.
Forced vaccinations, despite being contradictory to one’s health and medical issues, are also being discussed, debated and encouraged. To force an unnecessary medical procedure on someone is wrong. It goes against one of the principles that our country was founded – individual liberty. But God help us. I fear that that liberty and the freedom to make our own health care choices, are dangerously close to being taken away.
Cathy Jameson is a Contributing Editor of Age of Autism.
Re the little boy with leukemia, how bizarre is it that his doctors have allowed him to go to school? Dont they know that there are plenty of pathogenic microorganisms for which we have no vaccines.? Dont they know that not all individuals mount an immune response after a vaccine?
Posted by: Cherry Sperlin Misra | February 18, 2015 at 01:10 PM
@David Burd:
That's not 'my' list; it's one compiled by Leslie Manookian back in 2013 (if memory serves). I also noted that Sherri Tenpenny's name isn't on that list. I may write Leslie and ask her to update it...
Thanks.
Posted by: Bayareamom | February 17, 2015 at 12:43 PM
Thank you again to bayareamom and also to David M Burd for your information and equally important, your support.
Posted by: LInda L. | February 17, 2015 at 12:36 PM
Bayareamom,
Two (2) more distinguished docs you can add your list:
Dr. Donald Miller, Jr. Seattle, Washington - Cardiac surgeon (ret.) and author of articles citing dangers of vaccines,
Dr. Matt Irwin - Family Doc; Alexandria, VA, - also author of extensive paper condemning the doctrine of Hiv causing Aids.
Posted by: david m burd | February 17, 2015 at 10:49 AM
@Linda L.:
You may want to show this LIST of concerned physicians and scientists re vaccines. I just found this over at Leslie Manookian's website, "The Greater Good."
Speaking to them about this documentary wouldn't be such a bad thing, either!
http://www.greatergoodmovie.org/news-views/doctors-and-scientists-with-concerns-about-vaccines/
LIST:
Doctors and Scientists with Concerns About Vaccines
Shizuo Akira, MD, PhD
David Amaral, PhD, MIND Institute, UC-Davis
François-Jérôme Authier, Professor, PhD
David Ayoub, MD, Radiologist
Anne-Catherine Bachoud-Levia, PhD
Toni Bark, MD
David S. Baskin, PhD
Denis Bedoret, PhD
Russell Blaylock, MD, CCN, former clinical assistant professor of neurosurgery at the University of Mississippi Medical Center in Jackson, MS. and is currently a visiting professor of biology at Belhaven University, Jackson, MI
T. Bobrowicz, PhD
Kenneth Bock, MD
Marie-Françoise Boissea, PhD
Subbarao Bondada, PhD
Jeff Bradstreet, MD
Pierre Brugierese, PhD
Julie Buckley, MD
Thomas Burbacher, MD
Fabrice Bureau, PhD
Rashid Buttar, DO, FAAPM, FACAM, FAAIM
Stephanie F. Cave, MS, MD, FAAFP
E. Cernichiari, PhD
Pierre Cesaroa, PhD
Lakshman Chelvarajan
T. Chen, PhD
Xavier Chevalierf, PhD
Shiv Chopra, MSc, PhD
Stephanie Christner, DO
T. Clarkson, PhD
John Barthelow Classen, MD
Cevayir Coban, PhD
Maryline Couettea
Andy Cutler, PhD (research chemist)
Jeffrey Dach, MD
Josep Dalmau, MD, PhD
Vicky DeBold, PhD, RN
Jamie Deckoff-Jones, MD
Christophe J Desmet, PhD
Mary Catherine DeSoto, PhD
Richard Deth, PhD
J.G. Dórea, PhD
Peter Doshi, PhD Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
M. Duszczyk, PhD
Steven Edelson, MD, Director of the Autism Research Institute in San Diego
Mayer Eisenstein, MD
(The late) Dr. Frank Engley
Håkan Eriksson, PhD
Christopher Exley, PhD
Carl Feinstein, MD
Peter Fletcher, PhD, former Chief Scientific Officer, at the UK Department of Health
Lisa Freund, PhD
Paula A. Garay, PhD
Robert F. Garry, PhD
Thomas V. Getchell, PhD
Romain K. Gherardi, Professor, head of the department of Histology, Henri Mondor hospital, Paris, Neuropathologic and Clinical activities at the Neuromuscular Disease Reference Center, and is coordinator of the Department of Neurosciences INSERM
Beatrice Golomb, PhD, MD
Jay Gordon, MD
K.S. Grant, PhD
John Green, MD
Boyd Haley, PhD
Richard Halvorsen, MD
Diane Harper, MD, MPH, MS
(The late) Bernadine Healy, MD
Martha Herbert, MD, PhD, Professor of neurology at Harvard Medical
Laura Hewitson, PhD
Robert T. Hitlan, PhD
Amy Holmes, MD
Brian Hooker, PhD
Mady Hornig, PhD
Suzanne Humphries, MD
Philip Incao, MD
Ken J Ishii, PhD
Emmanuel Ittie, PhD
Dr. Jill James, PhD
Bryan Jepson, MD
Jerry Kartzinel, MD
Matthew S. Kayser, MD
Marcel Kinsbourne, PhD
Kouji Kobiyama, PhD
Sheldon B. Korones, MD
Arthur Krigsman, MD
Pierre Lekeux, PhD
A. Lerner, PhD
N. Liberato, PhD
S.X. Lin, PhD
Andrew D. Livingston, PhD
Yushu Liu, PhD
Brian J. Lopresti, PhD
Kurt M. Lucin, PhD
Patrick Maisona, PhD
M. D. Majewska, PhD
Jennifer Margulia, PhD
Thomas Marichal, PhD
N. Scott Mason, PhD
A. Kimberley McAllister, PhD
Jaquelyn McCandless, MD
Susan McCreadie, MD
(The late)Dr. Robert Mendelsohn, MD
(The late) John Menkes, MD, Former head of pediatric neurology at UCLA Medical School. Menkes was also director of pediatric neurology at the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles. In addition, he was a member of the Forum for Vaccine Safety with the National Institute of Medicine.
Joseph Mercola, DO
Claire Mesnil, PhD
K. Meyza, PhD
S. Midha, PhD
P. Mierzejewski, PhD
Elizabeth Mumper, MD, Associate professor of clinical pediatrics at the University of Virginia
Devi S. Nambudripod, MD
Meryl Nass, MD
C. Nelson, PhD
E. Newell, PhD
Raymond Obomsawin, MSc, PhD
Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD
Keiichi Ohata, PhD
M. Olczak, PhD
Dr. Mehmet Oz
Larry Palevsky, MD
Elodie Passeria, PhD
Michael S. Petrik, PhD
Jon Poling, MD
Diana Popa, PhD
Massroor Pourcyrous, MD
(The late) Bernard Rimland, MD
Aviva Jill Romm, MD
Catherine Sabatel, PhD
E. M. Sajdel-Sulkowska, PhD
Bob Sears, MD
Martyn A. Sharpe, PhD
Chris Shaw, Professor, PhD
DD Shen, PhD
K. Vijendra Singh, PhD
Yehuda Shoenfeld, MD, FRCP
Peter Siesjö, PhD
Ken Stoller, MD
Carol Stott, PhD
Arnold J. Stromberg, PhD
Z. L. Sulkowski, PhD
Louise Swarbrick, PhD
Rena C. Tabata, PhD
Sherri Tenpenny, DO
Jaime Tomko, PhD
Lucija Tomljenovic, PhD
Anju Usman, MD
Eva Vanamee, PhD
Chiara Villac, PhD
John Walker-Smith, Professor
Judy Wilyman, PhD candidate
Tony Wyss-Coray, PhD
Margaret C. Wong, PhD
V.C. Yang, PhD
Amy Yasko, MD
Edward Yazbak, MD
Judy Van de Water, PhD, Immunology, UC Davis
Chiara Villac, PhD
Walter Zahorodny, PhD, Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
A. M. Zavacki, PhD
Posted by: Bayareamom | February 16, 2015 at 10:00 PM
@Bayareamom
Thank you very much for the info. I need source information for my representatives. The issue is no longer vaccination, but parental and individual choice. Thank you for helping me.
Posted by: LInda L. | February 16, 2015 at 04:45 PM
Bayareamom,
I knew there had to be a connection between Krawitt and Pharma. Filling a 7 year old's head with fear of measles for the purpose of using him as a political prop, in this case a child suffering from the physical and psychological trauma of leukemia no less, is extreme child abuse.
And of course, while the focus is on measles, no one has the sense to ask, why do so many little kids now have leukemia? Measles infection in the 1950s was mild for the great majority and in those days no one was concerned about measles being a threat to immune suppressed children because immune suppressed children were rare.
Posted by: Linda1 | February 16, 2015 at 03:03 PM
"I don't know the precise basis of Bob's calculation but I don't have your faith in the CDC that 43% undeclared cases are unvaccinated: they would surely tell you this with alacrity if they were. Also, it may be mentioned that infants that are too young to be vaccinated have had their maternal anti-bodies destroyed by the vaccine program. Meanwhile, these same infants - who are too young to benefit from the sites and adventures of Disneyland - have been brought there where they may be exposed to risk (and would be even with full vaccination status for everybody)..."
"The reality is that the vaccine program is a messy business, and is neither as safe or effective as the propaganda would have us believe. And the more it fails the shriller the shills get."
Completely agree with the above statements by John. I don't trust the CDC as far as I can throw them. Why on Earth anyone would believe anything this institution has to say is beyond me...
Posted by: Bayareamom | February 16, 2015 at 12:45 PM
Good try Julie!! But the way the CDC presented the Disney measles cases is an excellent example of how data can be pulled about to misrepresent what's REALLY happening.
Let's do it another way. (Julie's stats are current as of 13-02-15):-
Of the 110 California patients 49 were unvaccinated (known status)
12 of these patients were babies too young to be vaccinated.
Of the remaining 37 patients, 28 were unvaccinated due to personal beliefs
Of these 28 patients, 10 were adults (so were old enough to be responsible for their own vaccination status), and 18 were children< 18 years)
One patient was on an alternative vaccination schedule, (so might have been measles vaxed with monovalent vaccine).
We are NOT given any details about the reasons or ages of the remaining 8 known to be unvaxed patients, so we can only make assumptions here. My guess is these persons were all too old for MMR jabs, but the CDC should come clean about this.
So if we leave out the 47 persons without vax documentation, (since we can’t make any assumptions here), then we have a grand total of 18 children, whose parents did not vax due to personal beliefs.
In percentage terms that’s a rounded 16%
13 persons had 1-3 measles containing vaccine doses, and one had antibodies indicating a prior measles vaccination or dose of natural measles.
That makes 14 persons vaxed or a rounded 13% of the total.
This is a significant percentage of measles vaccine failure, even allowing for some persons having had just one dose, (possibly 1-4 years cohort, not old enough for a booster).
Julie says the 47 persons with unknown status "are highly likely not to be fully vaccinated". I can't imagine how she thinks she knows this, but it's equally likely a fair proportion of these 47 persons WILL have received measles vaccinations. It is not at all unusual for vax documentation to be lost or missing.
Posted by: Jenny Allan | February 16, 2015 at 12:37 PM
@Linda L.:
I found it! The Johns Hopkins patient guide is online; here are the two links (I'll provide the link as well to the page number wherein the statement is made that the patient must not be around recently vaccinated individuals):
Link to Johns Hopkins website:
http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/kimmel_cancer_center/patient_information/
Link to the recovering cancer patient guide document:
http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/kimmel_cancer_center/patient_information/Patient%20Guide%20Final.pdf
Link to Page 113:
http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/kimmel_cancer_center/patient_information/Patient%20Guide%20Final.pdf
AND THERE IT IS:
Can I have
visitors?
•
Tell friends and family who are sick, or have recently had a
live vaccine (such as
chicken pox, measles, rubella,
intranasal influenza,
polio or smallpox
) not to visit.
•
It may be a good idea to have vi
sitors call first.
•
Avoid contact with children who were recently vaccinated
Posted by: Bayareamom | February 16, 2015 at 12:27 PM
@Linda L.:
I just wrote to Aaron Dykes over at Truthstream media. When/if I receive word from Aaron, I will let you know. You may try writing to him as well, but in the meantime, it may be possible to download a copy of that document on the Net. I'll see if I can find it, but with the two of us looking, maybe one of us will get lucky.
I'm going to search for a copy of that document now. If you by chance find same, please let me know.
Posted by: Bayareamom | February 16, 2015 at 12:15 PM
Julie,
I don't know the precise basis of Bob's calculation but I don't have your faith in the CDC that 43% undeclared cases are unvaccinated: they would surely tell you this with alacrity if they were. Also, it may be mentioned that infants that are too young to be vaccinated have had their maternal anti-bodies destroyed by the vaccine program. Meanwhile, these same infants - who are too young to benefit from the sites and adventures of Disneyland - have been brought there where they may be exposed to risk (and would be even with full vaccination status for everybody).
I would mention that a couple of years ago in the UK the authorities and the media made an obscene song and dance about unvaccinated people in Wales (many of the cases fabricated for the media) when they had a bigger out break amid a highly vaccinated population in the North England a few months before, which was only ever referred to in passing. My own view is that health officials (particularly those in Swansea in March 2014 were engaged in Muchausen Syndrome by Proxy). The real message is that we are being given selective information to manipulate us. There is no way in normal circumstances that a few cases of measles would get this level of media attention, with prepared lies about Andrew Wakefield - who was never momentarily in a position to influence popular opinion in the US anyway, but has been converted into hate figure.
The reality is that the vaccine program is a messy business, and is neither as safe or effective as the propaganda would have us believe. And the more it fails the shriller the shills get.
Posted by: John Stone | February 16, 2015 at 11:59 AM
Yes, Anne S, recent polls show 40% in Canada are uncertain about the science supporting vaccines. Obviously many people, especially the younger ones who see and live with the higher autism numbers are not believing the spin. It must burn that all that money and media savvy try (reddit, Scienceblogs...) hasn't worked.
Posted by: Theyrlosing | February 16, 2015 at 11:53 AM
The media blitz is not ending because it's paid-for PR. I would like to know if it's our own tax dollars paying for this - I assume it is. All the online polls are skewed by paid PR people who bash "anti-vaxxers". All the online articles too. They also have robo-posters, software that allows people like Dorit Reiss to post faster than humanly possible. So don't assume the masses really are against us (the pro-safety, pro-choice group). PR just spins it to look that way.
Posted by: AnneS | February 16, 2015 at 11:19 AM
I don't know where you got those numbers Bob...CDC reads this: "Among the 110 California patients, 49 (45%) were unvaccinated; five (5%) had 1 dose of measles-containing vaccine, seven (6%) had 2 doses, one (1%) had 3 doses, 47 (43%) had unknown or undocumented vaccination status, and one (1%) had immunoglobulin G seropositivity documented, which indicates prior vaccination or measles infection at an undetermined time. Twelve of the unvaccinated patients were infants too young to be vaccinated. Among the 37 remaining vaccine-eligible patients, 28 (67%) were intentionally unvaccinated because of personal beliefs, and one was on an alternative plan for vaccination. Among the 28 intentionally unvaccinated patients, 18 were children (aged <18 years), and 10 were adults. Patients range in age from 6 weeks to 70 years; the median age is 22 years. Among the 84 patients with known hospitalization status, 17 (20%) were hospitalized"
50% of this outbreak are not fully vaccinated...plus another 43% unknown (which are highly likely not to be fully vaccinated). If you're going to write ridiculous comments do your research properly.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm64e0213a1.htm
Posted by: julie | February 16, 2015 at 10:53 AM
For Bayareamom
Please tell me where I can find a copy (preferably online) of the Johns Hopkins patient guide for recovering cancer patients. I need a copy of that page 113. I am in the process of making an appointment to see all my representatives to talk about vaccine choice. I know the first thing they will tell me is that small children in school with cancer need the herd to be vaccinated. I intend to show up with my own research, and this page from their guide is very important.
Posted by: LInda L. | February 16, 2015 at 07:42 AM
Well, this just keeps getting better and better.
Remember the little boy of late who has leukemia; he's being used as the front guy (and an admittedly adorable one) for his Dad who is postulating that it is the UNVACCINATED kids who need to stay away from school so that his immunocompromised son doesn't 'catch' whatever these unvaccinated kids have (does it get any more absurd than this?).
Here's the link to this article:
http://www.activistpost.com/2015/02/vaccine-wag-dog-underway-to-take-away.html
SNIP (with a little surprise):
"Enter Rhett Krawitt. His face has been everywhere lately that the measles vaccination controversy has been.
That’s because the 7 year old, who is recovering from child leukemia, is being exploited by his father as a key reason why the vaccinated should not be allowed in schools.
Though Rhett Krawitt is too young to understand it, his image as a vulnerable child is being used to manipulate support for this draconian restriction of medical freedom – even in spite of the facts!
It is vaccinated children – not unvaccinated children – that immunocompromised people like Rhett, who is recovering from chemotherapy treatments for his leukemia, are advised to stay away from. Check out what is written on page 113 of this Johns Hopkins patient guide for recovering cancer patients:
Can I have visitors?
• Tell friends and family who are sick, or have recently had a live vaccine (such as chicken pox, measles, rubella, intranasal influenza, polio or smallpox) not to visit.
• Avoid contact with children who were recently vaccinated.
Here the “adorable” Rhett is referred to as the “what can only be described as the cutest, if not most convincing, call for parents to vaccinate their children.”
Prompted by his father, Carl Krawitt, he is asking the government to restrict parents’ rights to choose whether or not their children are vaccinated..."
Now here's the interesting surprise:
"But what the dozens of prominent stories on the heartwarming – or alternately heartbreaking – case on Rhett Krawitt DON’T discuss, however, is that Rhett’s grandfather is a medical doctor and a consultant to GlaxoSmithKline.
That’s a conflict of interest, no matter how unimportant it may seem.
Vermont gastroenterologist Dr. Edward Krawitt, MD, who specializes in hepatitis cases, has been a paid consultant to GSK for years. It shows up in Glaxo disclosures, and in the fine-print conflict of interest reports in Dr. Krawitt’s scientific papers – but it doesn’t factor into the media debate on twisting arms and forcing parents to vaccinate in California and, perhaps, the rest of the country.
That part is the dirty little secret. Or, alternately, the boring detail not worth mentioning.
But it makes a difference – not just in the public example being made of Rhett Krawitt, but in the Big Pharma-funded politicians who are pushing the bill through in California..."
Posted by: Bayareamom | February 15, 2015 at 11:40 PM
Posted by: Sandy Gottstein | February 15, 2015 at 10:14 PM
Thanks Jenny & Angus (below)
Interesting Alex Jones interview, the MMR package insert is a disaster all by itself...
Sadly, a "7th grade health test" now even includes a UK doctor MMR fraud question...
The correct answer to this question will come out soon.
Posted by: cmo | February 15, 2015 at 09:51 PM
This just proves what a fascist government we have, many of whom are obviously receiving big money from big pharma and big agra lobbyists. To try and vote them out office would be a dream come true. It's an outrage how they capitalize on people's fears, such as suggesting that some murderers may have been autistic, or that parents who choose not to vaccinate their children are criminals, and generating hostility towards them.
Posted by: Margaret R Dodge | February 15, 2015 at 05:29 PM
And not to forget Carmel...
http://www.whale.to/vaccines/wakefield9.html
MMR RIP
Posted by: Angus Files | February 15, 2015 at 02:37 PM
Im seeing different numbers from the CDC's report on California measles cases from Disney is up at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm64e0213a1.htm but it makes the same point.
It shows that of the 110 cases in CA, only 18 of these were unvaccinated children with personal belief exemptions, or 16% of the cases. This hardly seems like strong support for the elimination of personal belief exemptions.
Posted by: Tim Lundeen | February 15, 2015 at 01:27 PM
http://www.jeffereyjaxen.com/blog/dr-wakefield-speaks-puts-critics-forced-vaccination-to-rest
In this Alex Jones interview, Dr Wakefield makes many of the points also recently made in many AoA articles.
Please watch and listen.
Posted by: Jenny Allan | February 15, 2015 at 07:43 AM
"To force an unnecessary medical procedure on someone is wrong. It goes against one of the principles that our country was founded – individual liberty. But God help us. I fear that that liberty and the freedom to make our own health care choices, are dangerously close to being taken away."
We had a similar scenario in the UK, 2013, when a small measles outbreak in Wales, was hyped up and inflated to a ridiculous degree, claiming notified measles cases (>1500) as actual cases (around 250). It was, of course all Andrew Wakefield's fault, and THAT 1998 Lancet paper, for discouraging parents from vaccinating their children, now 'teenagers' whom we were told were coming down with measles in droves. (Jenny McCarthy is unknown in the UK). We had the same manic doom and gloom forecasts from ever more rabid health spokespersons and pharma paid press and media.
The propaganda spewing from the BBC, a non commercial, TV and Radio media corporation funded by UK compulsory licence payers, was particularly vile, culminating in a late evening Newsnight little piece of playacting, involving Paul Offit, on a Transatlantic TV link, extolling the necessity of mandatory measles vaccine- the MMR of course, and of all persons a smirking Fiona Godlee, parroting the non compulsory stance of Professor Salisbury -he who forced through that dangerous Urabe mumps MMR vaccine in 1988. Joining in enthusiatically was that would be thesbian, news presenter Jeremy Paxman, who weighed in heavily on the side of Offit. This 'famous three' managed to denigrate Dr Wakefield, including mentioning the Texas litigation against the BMJ, Godlee and Deer, criticise Salisbury for his stance, and castigate parents who fail to vaccinate their children, against that dire and dangerous measles disease. The whole thing was plainly rehearsed by all three of them.
In response to my complaint, the BBC replied Jeremy was playing 'Devil's Advocate', although there was a fierce denial of any presenter bias or playacting. My advice? "Stick to the day job Jeremy. Your acting is c...p." Newsnight has been reformated with new presenters after an avalanche of complaints about blatant widespread misreporting, and bias in all kinds of news reporting, particularly the Jimmy Savile scandals. Jeremy is still looking for a new day job.
Ultimately this all backfired on the Welsh health authorities, who were revealed to have peddled misinformation and false propaganda, particularly their emphasis on unvaccinated 'teenagers' being blamed for the outbreak. The truth was, most of those teenagers WERE MMR vaccinated and they shunned any extra doses. Wales was left with more than £100,000 worth of unwanted MMR vaccine, and a public angry about how they were misled into vaccinating their 6 month old babies, (contraindicated on vaccine inserts).
Dr Wakefield also got his side of the story published in a mainstream news outlet and publicly offered to debate Prof Salisbury on TV. Salisbury, like Offit, WON'T debate anyone holding opposing views on vaccine issues.
ChildHealthSafety has recently reported much larger measles outbreaks were taking place in highly MMR vaccinated populations in the North of England, at the same time as the Welsh outbreaks;(scroll down for the article). The Welsh outbreak was plainly used as a diversionary tactic.
The UK measles hubris was nasty enough, but was nothing like as vile as some of the US press and media Nazi and Stazi like rhetoric. You all have votes. Please make sure your own congress person knows your views.
Posted by: Jenny Allan | February 15, 2015 at 06:42 AM
As the Chinese say .. "every crisis presents opportunity" .. which explains why .. our public health authorities and their "sock puppets" in the media .. have created a "crisis" where none exists .. and .. have used that "crisis" as THEIR "opportunity" to further demonize parents reluctant to vaccinate their children .. as well as .. osctracize the children of those demonized parents.
It is a win - win .. for them.
Howwever .. just read the CDC has reported that only 16 of the 110 people who contracted measles in California .. were unvaccinated .. which means .. 86% were vaccinated .. and .. still got measles.
If that statistic proves true .. it is no longer a "win-win" for them ..
Imagine a measles vaccine that has an 86% failure record .. in a world where we are constantly being told .. measles is only a short plane ride away ...
Now that would be a "crisis" even the sock puppets will have a hard time turning into an "opportunity'"
Posted by: Bob Moffitt | February 15, 2015 at 06:15 AM