Mother Knows Best
Media Heats Up on Vaccine Debate

Baldo Study Authors Fail to Explain GSK Vaccine Deaths Following Puliyel Challenge

InfanrixBy John Stone

The challenge by Dr Jacob Puliyel previously reported in AoA  to explain an excess in 69 deaths from sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) following the administration of  GSK Infanrix Hexa hexavalent vaccine has met with an irrelevant response from the authors of a paper exonerating the vaccine. Elisabetta Franco, replying on behalf of the eight author of the Baldo study writes:

The opinion of all the Authors is that the suggested imbalance in reported SIDS between 0-9 days and 10-19 days periods represents a well recognised bias in spontaneous report reporting, where the shorter the time that has elapsed between the vaccination procedure and the event, the more likely it is to be perceived as a trigger and subsequently be reported.

As Puliyel (consultant paediatrician at St Stephen’s Hospital, Delhi)  points out this would have been alright if we were talking about adverse reaction reports but these are SIDS reports. Two of the study authors are direct employees of GSK and other have a multitude of conflicts acknowledged in their paper. The anomaly of the SIDS  deaths came to light after an Italian court ordered the publication of the data following the regression of child into autism.

The original confidential report  by GSK hid the possible impact of the vaccine by spreading the deaths over a three week period.  Puliyel had written:

However if one analyses the data looking at deaths in first 10 days after administration of vaccine and compares it to the deaths in the next 10 days, it is clear that 97% of deaths (65 deaths) in the infants below 1 year, occur in the first 10 days and 3% (2 deaths) occur in the next 10 days. Had the deaths been coincidental SIDS deaths unrelated to vaccination, the numbers of deaths in the two 10 day periods should have been the same…The decelerating incremental-deaths further supports the contention that there is a clear relationship of ‘sudden death’ to the vaccination episode. 42 deaths had taken place in the first three days after vaccination, 16 deaths in the next 3 days between day 3 and day 5, 3 deaths between day 6 and day 8, 2 deaths between day 9 and day 11, and there were only 2 deaths in all of the remaining 10 days. The fact that rate of deaths decreases rapidly and continuously as time elapses after immunization, makes it clear that the deaths are related to the vaccination episode.

The 16 excess deaths on day 0 is perhaps an even more marked effect because infants are unlikely to be vaccinated at midnight and many of the background deaths will have occurred before administration.  After several days Dr Franco has not been back to defend her explanation or comment further.

In a further answer to Dr Tamás Ferenci of Budapest details another study documenting the problem.

Finally, Dr Ferenci says that active vaccine safety studies are better than passively acquired data. For well designed, managed and executed studies I wholeheartedly agree with him.

The TOKEN study aimed to assess comprehensively a possible causal relationship between vaccination and unexplained sudden unexpected death of children between their 2nd and 24th month of life. The study was supported and sponsored by the Paul-Ehrlich-Institute (PEI) and the Federal Ministry of Health (Bundesministerium für Gesundheit). Unfortunately this large study with a wealth of data has not been published in an indexed peer reviewed journal as yet. It is available here:

Parents of children who had died of SIDS were requested to participate in the study. 37.6% (254 cases) could be included in the study, where parental consent was obtained. Tables 31 and 36 show significantly increased risk of unexplained sudden unexpected death in the first 3 days after hexa- or pentavalent vaccination (1st and 2nd year of life).

So it appears that active studies have confirmed that there are two vaccines which cause 'sudden deaths'. I am grateful that the Italian Court has allowed public scrutiny of GSK's PSUR reports held as confidential by the EMA.

It is evident that European Medicines Agency have been content to sit on this matter with GSK watching more infants die from the vaccine, and even now they fail to respond even though the matter has been brought glaringly into the open.

John Stone is UK Editor for Age of Autism.

Comments

Examination

A couple of points -

"The study was supported and sponsored by the Paul-Ehrlich-Institute (PEI) and the Federal Ministry of Health (Bundesministerium für Gesundheit)."

Page 122

13. Sponsors
Paul-Ehrlich-Institute (PEI)
The Federal Ministry of Health (Bundesministerium für Gesundheit)
GlaxoSmithKline Beecham Biologicals
Sanofi Pasteur MSD

Table 58: Weighted case-control analysis of ever vaccinated versus never vaccinated, number (percentage), univariate and multivariate odds ratios

Number (percentage), univariate and multivariate odds ratios for vaccination within last 72 hours

Never Vaccinated (reference)
Ever Vaccinated Increased risk - 1.58 (0.81 - 3.07)

58% higher risk

go Rand


Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) was "created in the late 60's" to provide an excuse for what was happening in the USA with the DPT vaccine...


Prior to the introduction of organized vaccination programs, 'crib death' was so rare that it was not mentioned in infant mortality statistics. In the United States, national immunization campaigns were initiated in the 1960s when several new vaccines were introduced and promoted. For the first time in history, most U.S. infants were required to receive several doses of DPT (diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus), polio, and measles vaccines.[6] By 1969, an alarming epidemic of sudden unexplained infant deaths impelled researchers to create a new medical term -- sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).[7]

By 1972...SIDS had become the leading cause...of post-neonatal mortality (deaths of infants from 28 days to one year old) in the United States.[8] In 1973, the National Center for Health Statistics, operated by the CDC, created a new cause-of-death category to document deaths due to SIDS.[9,10]

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/042727_infants_sudden_death_vaccines.html#ixzz3Q4Jj5sF8

Michelle F

I no longer need scientific research to understand that death occurs post-vaccination regardless of when it occurs...day 1 - day 10...it's all the same to me. Babies don't spontaneously die without insult.

Joy B

Can't mess with dat stock price nope no way. We are so effed.


Bookmarked. Thank you, Mr Stone.

Louis Conte

John:
Thank you for this.

The reality is that there is a bias - the mainstream medical community wouldn't recognize vaccine injury even if it hit them over the head.

Not being able to see goes along with not being able to listen.

Louis

vaccine.explorer

If the "early" SIDS cases following vaccination are the result of "reporting bias" then how on earth could one possibly conclude the vaccine is to blame? Is there any potential result (negative for the vaccine) that could not be explained away as "reporting bias"?

John Stone

A further study has com to light:

Curr Med Chem. 2014 Mar;21(7):941-6.
Sudden infant death following hexavalent vaccination: a neuropathologic study.
Matturri L, Del Corno G, Lavezzi AM1.
Author information
Abstract

We examined a large number of sudden infant death syndrome victims in order to point out a possible causal relationship between a previous hexavalent vaccination and the sudden infant death. We selected 110 cases submitted to in-depth histological examination of the autonomic nervous system and provided with detailed clinical and environmental information. In 13 cases (11.8%) the death occurred in temporal association with administration of the hexavalent vaccine (from 1 to 7 days). In none of these victims congenital developmental alterations of the main nervous structures regulating the vital functions were observed. Only the hypoplasia of the arcuate nucleus was present in 5 cases. In one case in particular an acquired hyperacute encephalitis of the tractus solitarii nucleus was diagnosed in the brainstem. This studydoes not prove a causal relationship between the hexavalent vaccination and SIDS. However, we hypothesize that vaccine components could have a direct role in sparking off a lethal outcome in vulnerable babies. In conclusion, we sustain the need that deaths occurring in a short space of time after hexavalent vaccination are appropriately investigated and submitted to a post-mortem examination particularly of the autonomic nervous system by an expert pathologist to objectively evaluate the possible causative role of the vaccine in SIDS.

PMID:
24083600
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Jeannette Bishop

How does a vaccine safety trial get away with using "spontaneous report reporting," something we are repeatedly told isn't valid scientifically for establishing causation, so how can this be labeled a scientific safety study (or maybe it wasn't, and if not, what research was)?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)